Lets see how smart /b/ is. Does 0.99999.....=1 ?
>>674449511
yes
>>674449511
yes.
Yes.
>>674449511
yes
>>674449511
Sure, .33333...*3=.99999... and 1/3=.33333...
Besides, with infinite repetition of the decimal place, the portion remaining is infinitely small.
If lim H->1 then it never actually becomes 1, even though it goes on infinitely
>>674449511
depends if you want an exact answer or not
if you find out x= .99999... and x=1 then no but if you are rounding or have a range that the answer could be in then yes
>>674449598
>>674449604
>>674449637
>>674449669
Proof?
>>674449511
Obviously the limit is 1
>>674449511
No.
>>674450120
0.9 recurring = X
X times 10 = 9.9 recurring or 10 X
10 X - X = 9X / 9
9 divided by 9 = 1
>>674449945
exactly
>>674449511
x=0.9recur
.'. 10x=9.9recur
10x-x=9
9x=9
x=1
easy, easy nursery level maths guys
>>674449511
lim { 1/(1-1/x) = 1 }
x -> infty
At large enough x the term above is essentially 0.999999...
no. 0.99999..... = 0.99999.....
i'm sure of it.
>>674449511
If 7=10 what is the sum of 17?
>>674449511
And if 2=9 does then 9=2?
>>674450544
Fuck you, that is not how math works
>>674450618
>10x-x=9
>9x=9
>x=1
Weird how you dropped the recurring part at that point. What theorem states you can do that?
Shouldn't it be
10x-x=9.9recurr
9x=9recur
x=1.1 recur
>>674451049
>yes it is
>>674451155
Whoops meant
10x-x=9.9recurr
9x=9.9recur
x=1.1 recur
>>674451155
no you retard, 9.9recur, take away the .9recur is just 9.
>>674449511
We define it as 0.9 recurring equals 1
It doesn't equate it, but we define it that way because it's infinitely close.
>x=0.9 recurring
>10x=9.9 recurring
>10x-x=9.9 recurring - 9 recurring
>9x=9
>9x/9=9/9
>x=1
That's why we define it that way.
It doesn't mean it equates it.
>>674450846
AM I CORRECT? I NEED THE ANSWER BEFORE I GOT TO BE BOI
>>674449511
No. 1=1, 9.999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999... =/= 1. It's still off by that very small, infinitesimal amount.
>>674451391
third implier should be -.9 recurring, not - 9 recurring.
>Me being a faggot
>>674451232
Like I said, what theorem is that? I've gone far enough in math to understand they start doing some weird stuff, so please point to me who came up with that theorem.
does 1 = 0.99999..... ?
In math, no. In economics, yes.
If I put 99.99999999999% of my cock into your mom's ass, or I put 100% of my cock into your sisters ass, does it really make a difference?
>>674449511
Is 0.000000000000000000001 and
0.000000000000000000002 the same number?
>>674451358
LOL yeah no. That's not how it works.
>>674451508
Give me a quantifiable amount that separates 0.999... and 1
>>674451681
Underrated post
>>674449945
Infinitely small is not the same as non-existent
>>674451681
Best math ewa /b/ro
No, .99999 is just 9999.../1000.... which is just .9999.... How can you all not see this??
>>674451548
That's the usual way to put a rational number as a fraction.
High school, ladies and gentlemen.
>>674451954
>>674452070
Thank you, /b/ros!!
>>674449511
Yes.
Doesn't matter. There is still a countable number between .9999 and 1.. Even though that number is infinitely long it's still there and accounted for therefore there is a difference between .9999999 and 1.
>>674449511
No, they're different numbers
0.999... != 1, but 3/3 = 1
WHY ARE YOU NIGGERS SO STUPID THIS IS LITERALLY HOW IT IS BITCH ANYONE WHO SAYS ANYTHING ELSE IS STUPID AND SHOULD DIE. BITCH DO YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT "=" MEAN BOI? 9.9999999... ISNT ABSOLUTE AND 1 IS BITCH
>>674450846
>>674452074
1/3=0.33333333333...
0.3333333333... ×3 =0.99999999999...
1/3 × 3= 3/3=1
1=0.99999999999...
>>674449511
Its approximately 1 so i guess.
>>674452576
He sayd it faggots
>>674451807
How is that not how it works?
>>674453369
BITCH THIS IS WHY >>674452576
