Prove you're not a dumbfag /b/ros
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Prove you're not a dumbfag /b/ros
1.
Duh.
2
>>674432115
niggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggerniggernigger
>>674432252
retard came early
13
90, the answer is in the question, kek.
>>674432252
holy shit you're an retard
its 12
>>674432115
12
>>674432252
>>674432310
dumbasses
2
the first two rows don't count
21
>>674432115
4 and five sisxths
>>674432430
thats pretty smart, didnt think of it that way
x 0 automatically equals 0, plus 1 = 1.
30
>>674432115
30, counting 11's at ends
>>674432574
check again pal
13
>>674432310
>>674432430
OP here 2 smart ppl on /b/ thus far it also happens to be the answer
>>674432574
This
You all retards.
1 dumb niggers.
0
Did these fags really not learn the order of operations in school?
Anything times zero is ZERO ? Didn't you go to school? I'm a math major but holy shit even 4yo know this
>all these people not knowing that multiplying always comes before adding
>>674432115
1 + (1 x 0) + 1
1 + (0) + 1
1 + 1 = 11
>>674432115
5
5
?=2
nothing binds these "problems" together, so the sum of the first two is 5, the "?" however equals 2. git gud scrubs
>>674432865
Yup. 1 is the only real answer. No prorities shit
From row 1 to row 2 and row 2 to row 3 there is no addition sign, so you ignore the first 2 rows and only count the last.
>>674432115
its 2 cause there are no + signs in the beginning of the second or third line
1
Answer is 30
>>674432115
30 or 2
+12*0+1=?
+13*0=0
1, because all of the 1's before that don't count because they were multiplied by 0. Elementary math
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1x0+1
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1x0)+1
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+0+1
12
2. No equation sign on the first two lines, that means its useless. So the first two lines should be ignored. 3 smart ppl in this thread
>>674433529
Lol nope
If this is the case
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1x0+1=?
12+1x0=?
12=?
If this is the case
1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+1x0+1=?
30+1x0=?
30=?
If this is the case
(1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1)x0+1=?
0+1=?
1=?
If this is the case
1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1
1+1x0+1=?
5
5
2+1x0=?
5
5
2=?
>>674432115
PEMDAS
>>674434600
well done
>>674434600
>>674434984
Is only 1 way to do it
2, there is no operator linking the different rows together, thus only the last line counts for the equal sign.
>le no + between lines
> le question is 1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+11+1*0+1=?
>ez
fuck you all dumbtards, the answer is 30
>>674432395
You're the dumbass.
>>674432115
5
5
2
42
>>674432115
As soon as you reach the (1x0) literally treat that as its own equation, hence parentheses, then add final 1 at end to come to 12
you guys are stupid as fuck
>didn't you all ever play CoD: Order of Ops?
>>674432245
>>674432247
>>674432252
>>674432359
>>674432371
>>674432388
>>674432395
>>674432487
>>674432510
>>674432574
>>674432600
>>674432630
>>674432674
>>674432600
>>674432630
>>674432674
>>674432827
>>674432846
>>674432975
>>674433098
>>674433156
>>674433299
>>674433309
>>674433529
>>674433769
>>674435251
>>674435712
You guys should sue your parents for giving birth to you and your monkey brains.
>>674435750
>CoD: Order of Ops
kek'd
>>674432115
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1*0+1
Order of operations dictates that you read it this way:
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+(1*0)+1
Which is 11 + 0 + 1 = 12. If you disagree, you are wrong.
>>674434600
Note that only the last case is correct since it has no added symbols like the other three.
>>674435750
Me again, looked at the img one more time and revised my answer by looking at it more literally
>40
1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674436342
>>674436082
If you look at .jpg literally, meaning no + sign between last '1' on first line and first '1' on second line then...
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + (1 x 0) + 1 = 40
>>674436110
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674436647
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674436110
You are talking about order of operation yet you added two "+" and you rearranged the three separate lines into one line. Are you from Africa or do you belong to the shitskin race? Maybe you are just retarded...
>>674436342
Fucking gay. Literal reading makes it
4+11+3+11+0+1 = 30
>>674436342
>>674436647
winrar
Anything multiplied by zero is zero. Maybe you faggots should take grade 1 again
?=x
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1·0+1=x
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>-1=x-1
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1·0=x-1
0=x-1
>>>+1
1=x
1=?
>>674436738
>>674436887
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674436738
If there were actually + signs in front of every line, then no, I wasn't wrong at all - and adding the parentheses is just a way to show that that's the operation that goes first.
>>674436659
>>674436700
>>674436961
No one cares about your fucking video
>>674436647
me here, I'm an idiot when i was adding 18 + 11 in my head I kept thinking 39 instead of 29 lmao
>I had the concept
>>674437190
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
DEF 1 LEARN TO CALC
>>674436659
>>674436700
>>674436961
Just because someone made a video about it does not mean they are correct, they are rearranging 3 lines into one line therefore it is INCORRECT, realize this retard.
>>674437115
IF, but you responded to OPs post therefore you answered incorrectly as you changed the actual question
>>674437387
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674437511
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674437565
>>674437565
3.3333333333333333333
>Anon tried to trick us
>>674437565
>>674437741
It's fucking 8 asspie
>>674432430
>the first two rows don't count
Multiplication first, then adding so it equals 12 PEMDAS
>>674437565
7-1x0+3/3=?
7+1=?
8=?
-1x0=0
3/3=1
>>674436932
You damn genius.
>>674437944
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
▲
▲ ▲
▲
>>674438036
>>674437601
>>674437529
>>674437335
>>674436961
>>674436700
>>674436659
>>674436593
is GayTube paying you to spam their shit all over
fuck
>>674432115
Don't know how, but I got George Washington Carver as the answer.
>>674432115
12, you fucking faggot.
>>674438210
>>674432115
12, gotta follow pemdas. Multiply the one and zero first, then add the rest together
>>674438517
>>674438490
>>674438469
>>674436110
>>674434611
stretch the entire problem out into one line faggot
is this what people think math is like? arbitrary bollocks?
>>674438469
>>674438490
>>674438517
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674432115
30, pretty obvious
>>674436932
But the question is:
1+1+1+1+1
1+1+1+1+1
1+1x0+1=?
This means you can rewrite it as:
1+1+1+1+1, 1+1+1+1+1, 1+1x0+1=?
NOT:
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1x0+1=?
Why? because you add two non existing "+"
So then the correct answers are the following
5, 5, 2=?
Time for you to get back to kinder garden little timmy
5
4
2
5
5*
2
>>674432115
F
(hexadecimal masterrace)
>>674438840
You don't add 2 non-existent '+' signs faggot. Allow me.
1 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + 1 + 1 + 1 + 11 + (1 x 0) + 1 = ???
>you are a faggot
>>674438840
lol there are two ways you could have read it, 1+1+1+11+1+1+11+1x0+1, or your way
>>674432115
130
>>674432115
Please Excuse My Dear Aunt Sally
Come draw le doge may mays
http://flockdraw.com/69t61o
KUCK MY KICK
>>674439074
oh really?>>674439067
>>674432115
Get that weak shit out of here this isn't normiebook
>>674439221
the ultimate noob
>anything multiplied by 0 is 0. + 1 = 1
>>674436045
Then what's the anser
>>674432115
see it is 2 because only the bottom line has an = on it.
>>674439261
he/you posted that literally 5 seconds before me, you retard
>>674439182
Kek'd so hard
>>674436045
Pemdas bitch
>>674439393
infinity * 0
>>674432115
It's 12 guys.
>>674439074
No, you are wrong, why? because you still change the actual "problem"
Look here:
1+1+1+1+1 1+1+1+1+1 1+1x0+1=?
that is how you would write it if you look at it your way, why? because there is NO connections between the three lines, otherwise it would be written:
1+1+1+1+11+
1+1+1+11+
1x0+1=?
and then your answer would be correct
>>674439511
5, 5, 2=?
12
>>674436045
Did the short bus run you over after you got dropped off at your foster home?
You are all types of retarded if you think 12 is wrong.
>>674432115
answer's 29 you nigger
1+1+1+1+11+1+1+1+1+11+1*0
30
you are all retarded
>>674440462
dude...........
>>674440097
this
>>674440320
see
>>674434600
>>674440097
and stop being ignorant
>>674439067
>>674438671
>>674436794
These anons have the correct line of thinking, and they are applying PEMDAS
>>674440320
>>674440246
>>674440173
>>674439957
you guys have sort of the thinking but are too stupid to think out of the box and stretch problem into one line
>>674432115
It's fucking 1. All of you are retarded.
1+1 = 2
2x0 = 0
0+1=1
fucking eh guys
You faggots are seeing too many + signs
Anyone saying 12 is a fucking moron
Anyone saying anything other than 12 is a retard
OP again I can't believe how much dumbcunts are on /b/ like literally any other answer than 2 is just made up bullshit there is only 1 line with =(equal) sign so that line is the equation/problem
>>674438671
it is 3 problems not 1, see >>674440097
>>674440855
/thread
>>674439687
>>674439182
4
>>674432115
tfw this isn't even a valid problem because you can't break numbers apart across a line you god damn retard.
>HURR DURR YOU GUYS ARE DUMB BECAUSE I MADE A NEW LINE
>>674432115
30 fegit
>>674432115
1
13
>>674441177
checkt & rekt
12 pemdas faggots
It's actually 2. Literally. Do you see any plus signs AFTER the first two rows of numbers? I didn't think so, and there are none before the last two rows either. So, you're left with 1 + 1x0 + 1. Thanks to PEMDAS, we can learn that the problem is basically 1 + (1x0) + 1, or 1 + 0 + 1, so you get two. Do you faggots even know how to do math and how to read?
Stupid bait question, because lines change doesn't mean that in they are added, nor they are multiplied and further more doesn't mean they are one "11". It could be literaly anything depending on each ones judges
ANYONE saying it is something else than two is retarded, why? I'm gonna explain it in an easy way to understand just for you:
you have 3 bananas
1. ===-
2. ===-
3. ===-
what you are doing is chopping off the ends of 2 bananas and split 1 in the middle, so that you get a long banana like this
=========-
and then you say that is the same as the 3 bananas from before.
>>674436045
Stupid faggot. Go to MIT and ask ANY engineer. Dumbass.
>>674442164
forgot to say that you put it together
>>674442164
confirmed autist
>>674442152
The "1" starting on its line are possitive "+", and that's why /b/tards got confused. Anyway it could've been possible. Anything could be possible here
>>674442464
>>674442352
two people got hurt when they realized they were wrong
>>674441177
Dubs of truth
>>674442093
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FKdTkia-L90
>>674442152
>>674442164
so you're only adding the bottom line and ignoring the first 2?
>>674442768
YES.
THAT IS LITERALLY EXACTLY WHAT WE ARE SAYING
>>674442768
you do not ignore the first two, you have 3 answers: "5", "5" and "2=?"
1
>>674442939
There are no equal signs after the first two lines you fucko
>>674442709
>>674442643
I concede
the answer is both 12 and 2
Nowhere in the example does it even IMPLY that all 3 lines must be used to obtain an answer, therefore the obvious solution is ‘2’, as follows 1+(1×0)+1=2. Math is simply nothing but logic and you can’t ASSUME things that aren’t stated. End of story.
>>674443165
I pulled answer (explanation) from here
It explains both theories faggots
you're welcome
assetrover. vom /blog/90-fail-answer-correctly-solution/
>>674443165
typo 12 & 2
meant 30 & 2
>>674432115
Its 12, because PEMDAS, multiplication comes before addition. Therefore, you would first multiply 1 times 0, and you get zero, then add the rest of the ones.
>>674443104
exactly, did you even read what i wrote? "5", "5" and "2=?"
why 5? because either way you slice it 5x1=5, five ones is equal to five!
>>674443165
There's no brackets in the equation. So all factors are consecutive.
>>674443549
assetrover .vom /blog/90-fail-answer-correctly-solution/
>>674443104
what you are saying then is that 1+1+1+1+1 cannot possibly be rewritten to 5?
>>674443720
it's taken straight from the website's answer faggot, fuck off before i make you, my brother is a Navy Seal
>>674443972
your brother is a seal? can he balance a ball on his nose and make funny noises?
srs thats basic math pretty sad
>>674432115
fucking easy
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1*0+1 = ?
1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1*0+1 = ?
12 * 0 + 1 = ?
11 + 1 * 0 + 1 = ?
1 * 1 + 1 * 0 + 1 = ?
1 * 1 + 10 + 1 = ?
1 + 10 + 1 = ?
11 + 1 = ?
1 * 1 + 1 = ?
1 * 2 = ?
2 = ?
fucking retards
Oh yea, pemdas
>>674438840
you have it rigth mate some of the idiots caliming to have a masters in math fuck if it is true. his fucked. every line is a diferent operation .i would really like to punch the creator of that video. fuck him in his ugly jew faces.the logic of theequation is stupid. and its even dumberm that the summerfags dont get it.
