The only reason the new Ghostbusters trailer has so many dislikes is because sexist babymen dont want an all female cast.
http://fusion.net/story/276398/ghostbusters-trailer-backlash-sexist-comments/
>>672660397
>>672660397
that, and also fans of the original are disappointed that this is all that they could come up with. It's just gonna give ghostbusters a bad name
>>672660397
it is the first movie, i can tell from the tralier, thats not good.
>>672660397
The trailer ends on slapstick humor..... it's got nothing to do with all female cast.
I KNOW NEW YORK
>>672660397
Get away Melissa
>>672660625
>implying you can tell from the trailer its not good
>>672660397
Why ruin an iconic franchise with 4 defective sandwich makers?
>a movie has women in it
>negative reviews must be mysoginist!
>a movie has black people in it
>negative reviews must be racist!
>#OscarsSoWhite
Face it: white men are better at everything
>>672660803
YES I DO
>>672660397
>>672660397
fresh bait of 4chan
>>672660924
AAAYYYYYYYYYYYYY WAT DID YOU SAYYYY AAYYYY
Don't mind me, just dumping some dumps
>>672660862
no it's not a good sign
>>672660862
Of course you can. If the trailer contains bad acting, bad jokes and a bad plot there is a high chance that the rest of the movie is not any better.
I know this is b8 but honestly this movie looks awful and hopefully the hype with settle and I can continue living my life pretending it never happened.
>>672660929
YO IMA FUCK YOU UP LITTLE WHITE BOI BITCH
>>672660397
I disliked it because the cast seems entirely bland and painful to watch. The effects are shitty, the jokes are corny, the acting sub-par. I wouldn't even be against an all-female cast, if it were executed well.
The way that bitch words it is incredibly offensive, as if the movie is some kind of masterpiece and everyone who dislikes is a sexist baby-man, when in reality the trailer is just really shitty.
inb4 batman gets a remake with a woman.. of course the fans will go apeshit on that kind of garbage
>>672660397
I'm just glad they convinced Ernie Hudson to come back.
>>672660929
actually the black womans role in the films has been heavily critisied for being racist. some people are never happy.
>>672661137
agreed, it should have been the original script dan acroid wrote where it's in the future and like they jump dimensions
>>672661137
>sexist babyman detected
>>672660397
I am fine with a full female cast. Hell, make them transgender 10-cock/11 vaginas alien furry MLP figures.
What I'm not okay with is that this movie will blow because it will cater to hipster idiots and kids. Awful dialogues, bad humor, over the top tryhard to be funny, dubstep track, full of fucking CGI, bad effects (the plasma puke looked fucking ugly) and OMG, thiese fuckers even introduced the old movie wrong. WINSTON WASN'T A FUCKING SCIENTIST! But we need a black loud and violent Ghostbuster to be funny and original
>>672661120
>>672661137
>>672661215
>>672661225
..and they still call it Batman, despite the fact that she's not a man.
>>672661111
Gud quad
>>672661273
Fortunately they turned that script into Rick and Morty.
1. There are plenty of other movies that we love that have lead female roles.
2.We only hate this movie because changing them all to female is too big of a character change.
3. This is like reamking James Bond with a Mexican Midget and then calling anyone who doesn't like racist midget haters.
4. Your either retarded OP or this bait.
>>672660967
>>672661027
>>672661211
>>672661322
>>672661359
>>672660397
I think its more about this being a butchered and chopped up version of the old movies attempting to focus solely on comedy as opposed to the subtle realness and some scary scenes of the old film.
>>672660397
When any other segment of a population tries to take a great movie and make it their own it's gonna be shit. If this was 4 white men doing a reboot it would still be shit. Reboots are nearly always 100% shit. The least they could do is wait another 30 yrs so most people had never seen the old one.
>>672661453
>>672661401
>This is like reamking James Bond with a Mexican Midget
>>672661137
Just don't watch it. Nothing is going on
>>672661249
So let's make a movie thats just abstract shapes, then no one can complain about race or gender
>>672661188
Threatening with physical violence when faced with a differing opinion? That's not very polite. You should be more tolerant
>>672660397
It has nothing to do with the cast being women. Everything we saw in that trailer was pure cringe and shitty cheesy jokes that didn't even make me smile. The jokes are bad, the delivery is bad, the cgi looks aweful, the actresses have no presence. Could have been 4 men, still would have been shitty.
TL;DR : Shit trailer to unnecessary reboot
>>672661401
Aren't you excited for my sexyness or do you think you won't be able to handle it when I finally come on the big screen ??
>>672661563
Well that was basically what I was saying, with zoolander 2 out it won't be hard to avoid.
>>672661603
Ghostbusters was a pretty good movie.
Ghostbusters 2 wasn't that great.
Ghostbusters 3 is a terrible-looking reboot of a 30 year old movie that won't capture any of the style and presence that made the first movie good.
Even with the original cast, this was going to be a pile of crap. That's why the original cast didn't do it.
So on top of all this, they get a bunch of hack broads to play all the characters in some sort of bid to "fight sexism and oppression" and show that "women can be funny, too!" Fuck that shit. I'm supposed to like it when feminists decide to insert their fucking agenda into shit that I like?
Goddamn feminists raped the Ghostbusters. Thumbs down, bitches.
>>672661659
True. But you said you were hoping the hype will pass and that you can continue living. You can literally continue living right now, ignoring the movie from now on. Close the thread, start your favourite videogame or go to the beach
>>672661603
I wonder how much money I could get for that movie.
>>672661659
zoolander was shit don't see it. i was expecting it to be bad, it was awful
>>672661654
>>672660397
Possibly
My self and lots of others don't care about the casting choice but are mad at the witters for ditching the classy humor or the original for shitty slapstick humor.
Also Ghostbusters was a one off thing, Ghostbusters 2 was really bad so any remake or sequil would also be bad, you can't compare or top the original.
>>672661401
>1. There are plenty of other movies that we love that have lead female roles.
>>672661560
That could be pretty dope. Better than this atrocity anyways.
>>672661753
This isn't funny anymore guys, I mean, they're surely joking
>>672660397
Yeah I don't want an all female cast. What's wrong with that?
>>672661797
I'd watch it
>>672661813
Really? They aren't meant to be good movies to any degree just like the first one, more or less I enjoyed the lame humor in the first one because it was like a slam of YLYL and cringe.
>>672661885
>>672661401
>1
I loved Jackie Brown and she was a strong empowered black woman.
>>672660803
She's just so goddamn ugly.
>>672661401
It's completely different to making James Bond with a Mexican midget.
James Bond is a mans name. Thus it must be a male character.
Ghostbusters is a gender neutral name. It could be anyone.
This is a massive difference and it is why James Bond must never be played by a woman. Or Mexican midget for that matter.
>>672661976
yes i like the first one the second it bad.
>>672662050
Tarantino's a genius
>>672661603
you better hope some hollywood producer isnt reading this thread
>>672662014
>>672662140
Are you seriously that autistic ?
>>672662074
>>672662143
Well shit that's disappointing but thanks for saving me $7 and two hours anon.
>>672660397
what a shit bait article. the funny thing is, after her sexist baby man rant the author probably wont go to the theater and watch that shit movie either.
> Let's build a wall
>>672662050
The sex scene in Jackie Brown is very funny.
>>672660397
the problem is not the all female cast, its that the chosen females simply do not fit in the roles they try to fill
>>672662140
people don't like it because it's a cheap movie.
1) take an old movie because rehashing old movies isn't the trend for like 10 years now
2) make it innovative by replacing cast with opposite gender (which is also over done)
3) be unable to understand remakes are terrible and no one wants to see yet another one of a cult classic
ie: TNMT, karate kid, just fucking google "bad remakes"
>>672662333
Trips don't lie
>>672661654
what an awful Tracer cosplay
>>672662399
>>672662268
You must have replied to the wrong post due to your severe autism.
>>672662399
Dubs trips. Fuck its going to habben!!!!
>>672662140
Holy fucking shit, I'm literally going to have to find a nice big recliner to sit down in while I ponder how someone can be this autistic. How do you live with yourself? How can you go on day by day knowing that you are literally the dumbest piece of shit nigger 90% of the people you've come across have ever met? You know everyone talks behind your back about how you're special and should hang yourself right? You realize you are a living, breathing, shitting joke right? Holy shit, I'm going to go read a book and make sure I never get as retarded as you my friend.
>>672660397
Okay, but what is the point in making the Ghostbusters cast all women? There is no point. And don't say it's to empower women because woman are pretty much equal to men right now. A woman could become the next president.
>>672662374
>2) make it innovative by replacing cast with opposite gender (which is also over done)
Please provide an example or 2
>>672662525
>>672662548
>projecting
lrn2argue
>>672660397
All of the good scenes go into a trailer, imagine the rest of this turd.
>>672662577
Not him but BSG off the top of my head.
>>672662245
Fuck yes Fifth Element was brilliant , Oh yes what else oh Yes the 1st 2 original Alien movies were good lead female roles.
>>672662577
Essentially the new Star Wars was a remake with better CGI and a female lead Kek
>>672660803
Oh man I got a good laugh there. Thx.
>>672661952
I think the sheer "What the fuck is this" Would get people to see it
>finger on the trigger
>pointing the gun at her head
>>672660397
M U M B L E D E B O N I C S
U
M
B
L
E
D
E
B
O
N
I
C
S
I don't have a problem with the 2 in the middle, its just female Adam Sandler and the Token Black Gorrila.
>>672662140
You seem strongly autistic. Strongly. I know that doesn't seem like it fits but my god it does. I can only say that you need to stop focusing on small details so heavily and start thinking outside the box. Holy fuck Anon. I'd say I need to sit down but I'm already sitting. My god.
Well why don't we remake cinderella with Carl from fucking Croydon who lost his glass condom at the ball and watch tumblr erupt you can't change things
>>672662548
1. There are plenty of other movies that we love that have lead female roles.
2.We only hate this movie because changing them all to female is too big of a character change.
3. This is like reamking James Bond with a Mexican Midget and then calling anyone who doesn't like racist midget haters.
4. Your either retarded OP or this bait. I said the following above and then he calls me autistic after what he said in reply hahahaha I'm in tears hahaha
>>672660397
I like how the black one is still the uneducated one
>>672662679
>1 female character
>every charcter is female
pick one
>>672662165
Thankyou stranger. Im new here but glad to find out a majority of users here enjoy my work
>>672662643
battlestar galatica? thats not a film.
>>672662944
LET GO OF MY HAND. yea. they didnt need more
>>672662649
This could be argued too.
>>672662268
>>672662548
>>672662868
samefag softer
>>672662632
>>672662467
Okay so I'm assuming you're >>672662140
I'm going to give you a list of some reasons why this comes off as heavily autistic.
>James Bond is a mans name. Thus it must be a male character.
Okay, Wrong. They can call her Jamie Bond and Women can also have the name James even if it isn't a girls name.
>Ghostbusters is a gender neutral name.
Who gives a flying fuck it being gender neutral doesn't matter.
>This is a massive difference and it is why James Bond must never be played by a woman.
Again he could be played by a woman.
>Or Mexican midget for that matter.
Okay so that was a joke and it clearly went waaaaay over your head. Like so far over it that you argued against it even if its a joke. You just take jokes you don't argue their validity.
>>672662944
I said lead, and who else in the movie even mattered?
>>672663019
I'd like to see how they call us sexist now.
>>672662980
Point out where you specified movies
>>672663083
No one because she solved every problem by herself.
>>672663034
You think I have the time to write all that you autistic fuck?
>>672660397
I dont like this trailer coz female cast.. it's just because I dont like Fat people ! Its not the same !
>>672663034
Rekt
>>672661753
talking about something isn't the same as censoring it. The cartoon is political so is designed to provoke so some people are going to moan about it.
>>672663105
>>672663187
She's a
>space ship mechanic (Han solo and chewie don't mean shit anymore plus Hans dead so there's that.
>apparently inherent to using a lightsaber like a pro if she flutters her eyelids (she'll probably end up training Luke or he'll just die anyway.)
>master pilot (see first >)
>a total bitch (runs the show no need for the nigger)
And various other bullshit blah blah blahs
>>672663208
>>672663034
I'm also not that person with the phone. Theres multiple people telling you, you may be autistic.
the comments on the youtube trailer did have a bunch of idiots saying they didnt like it because it was women
which kind of detracts from the fact that it just looks shit
>>672660397
Hey give them SOME credit! The trailer made me go watch the original two movies. That's gotta be worth something.
>>672663411
Dubs don't lie
>>672662399
so many gets
i mean, only two so far, but still. now three though
this trailer is so much better
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z5CJ3-vsjcw
>>672663430
Yeah exactly what I meant idiot
>>672663070
>Okay, Wrong. They can call her Jamie Bond and Women can also have the name James even if it isn't a girls name.
No, his name is James Bond. They can't and will not change that.
>Who gives a flying fuck it being gender neutral doesn't matter.
I was only saying this as it gives them the freedom to do what they want with the characters.
>Okay so that was a joke and it clearly went waaaaay over your head. Like so far over it that you argued against it even if its a joke. You just take jokes you don't argue their validity.
Okay you are clearly the autistic one as I was joking. Jesus.
>>672660397
Realists know that the trailer gets so many dislikes because of sexists AND the trailer just looks awful.
>>672663147
we are talking about movies faggot
>>672663208
>autism in action
>>672663683
Holy fucking shit
>the characters name is James Bond
>the movies are fucking 007 movies
>ghost busters is the movie title
>the characters have individual names
changing one small aspect like what you call whoever the fuck your are referring to does not really matter, please get yourself sterilized.
>>672663411
>if i keep calling you autistic it makes it true
2 can play that game
>>672663756
I'm sexist and is the biggest reason Im not going to watch it. Not a fucking coward to not admit it unlike many faggots here.
>>672663776
And here I was thinking we were talking about replacing characters with the opposite gender.
Am I the only one who doesn't care about the quality (if it was just that i wouldn't waste time with it at all) and thinks the film is sexist?
>>672663683
>You are clearly the autistic one as I was joking. Jesus.
Okay you weren't joking or at least that wasn't clear because you replied to everyone so far and tried arguing against them and called them autistic for calling you autistic. So this really isn't helping your case because your text tone seemed very serious and it is serious because you still defended your points.
>>672663899
Seems like quite a needless waste of fun to be that way, but in this case you're not missing out on anything.
Honestly I like to break it down to "would I watch the Die Hard series of the lead was a woman" no I wouldn't, because women suck at just about everything and there is no way in hell a woman is about to crawl through ventilation ducts and kill a fuck ton of badass bad guys who are trying to ruin Christmas, fuck this Politic Correct bullshit.
>>672664016
From what I hear it's not politically correct to make fun of kids with autism, we should just let him be special we don't want him to hurt himself.
>>672664100
Checked. Depends on the chick, casting is critical.
>>672664100
Yeah action movies don't work with woman except when they're secret agents or ninjas.
>>672664100
Except there are women who would do this just like there are and aren't men who would do this. The John McClane's of the male population are in the lower percentages where the John McClanes in the women population are probably in the the 1%s
>>672664203
>>672664016
>reading text
>hears tone
whats wrong with you
>>672664322
Valid point dubs
>>672664362
So I'm assuming you never took a creative writing class or learned any comprehensive reading skills?
>>672664362
Even when you type there is a tone to your typing. You can't start off a text with "Serious text here joke at the end" because that just makes that joke seem serious because we aren't you so we don't know what you're thinking when you send that message.
>>672663830
Imagine a world where all autistic people have to get the snip so they can't breed and create more autism. I'm going to hell , I'm a bad person.
>>672661401
I can't say that I hate this movie. I hate this trailer because it was uninteresting and americanised, it was utter drivel - enter the reason that there are so many dislikes.
>>672664474
It sounds like utopia
>>672664495
I think the number of dislikes is 3 fold
1: It's a well loved movie, don't fuck with it
2: Come on, they're not even trying to hide the agenda
3: Lels, jimmy rustling etc
>>672664362
>james bond is a man's name
what is 007?
>>672664016
>calls people autistic
>is clearly autistic
way to go autist
>>672664639
a codename retard
>>672664495
"americanised" The original movies were americanised. You twat.
>>672664581
Why are you numbering your points like a fuckhead?
this movie - the movie that the trailer is about - has not been released so I cannot say I don't like it...
I don't care for the agenda that they have, if it's an interesting trailer or movie - i'll watch it. but it isn't.
my whole point.
>>672664434
>learned any comprehensive reading skills?
>learned any
lol clearly you never did either
>>672661885
>>672662014
>>672662245
you only like these movies because the women are "designed" to be straight guys fantasy dream sex bimbo. name one movie with a strong, intelligent female lead that doesnt just look like your dream sex object. ;)
>>672664733
Man I cannot keep up with the amount of autism in this thread, this should be capped for a cringe thread.
>>672664464
well if you weren't such a braindead moron you might have worked it out but instead act like a edgy 13 year old and shout AUTISM cos thats how you win at 4chinz lol XD
>>672664725
no shit, so why couldn't there be a codename for a female? My point is that James Bond - or 007 - can be a female character, even if it's a different arbitrary number used as a codename.
>>672664773
learned any makes sense. Learned is a word and any can be used after it.
>>672660397
Ill let them bust some ghosts outta my dick if you know what im sayin
>>672664202
>a woman is about to crawl through ventilation ducts and kill a fuck ton of badass bad guys
>Depends on the chick
the only way a woman could ever pull that off is in a different dimension where women have mutant abilities
>>672664773
>green texts something I wrote
>reading skills
I think you have your actions confused.
>>672664866
I might have figured it out based on absolutely nothing but that Anon being serious most of the time?
>>672664790
Ones already been posted for easy reference.>>672662649
To counter your argument, who do you think leads the equivalent male action movies?
>>672664495
There's many reasons I hate this trailer and a lot of it is to do with how Americanised it is and it just reminds me of the rest of all the mind rotting crap out there. Seriously it's scary where the world is headed in terms of intelligence and movies like this don't help. We need movies , music , games etc that make us think again like they use to. Now everythings cheap distracting garbage. Sorry to sound like an old cunt but wow our future doesn't look good.
>>672664881
Well if her codename was James Bond they'd figure out she was a spy pretty quickly seeing as she's be a woman and she has a mans name for no reason. Stop being a retard for being a retards sake.
>>672664917
>woman points shot gun at boss villain at top of building
>pulls trigger
>recoil sends her 90 lbs ass flying
>falls to her death
the patriarchy prevails again
>>672664733
Original ghostbusters - talented actors, rich dialogue, a fable that could be enjoyed by most families in pretty much any society.
New ghostbusters - "ghetto ass black" women, idiot fat women and frustrating slapstick humor that breaks apart the old movies fun-for-all paradigm.
>>672664100
just because you dont know any cool women, doesnt mean there arent any. they probably just dont wanna talk to a little bitch like you
>>672665140
That has nothing to do with Americanised that has everything to do with feminist agendas and PC culture.
>>672660397
This thread summed up.
>>672665083
I think I smell b8, at least I hope so.
>>672664970
who the fuck is max resdefault? some poncy french actor?
>>672665140
>gives an opinion on a film he hasnt seen any of
retard
>>672664768
You made your point and claimed it was the reason there was so many dislikes, I provided some alternatives, no need to get all sore about it anon.
>>672665083
Her codename is 00* you fucking retard. she could be Jane bond. If you argue that having a different main character breaks the movie then you should agree that it will do the same for the ghostbusters - which was only really good because of the stellar actors in the first one.
>>672665159
Lol so you know a woman who would have been able to actually do something that hardcore? I'd love to meet the roided up man lady you let peg you.
Kek
>>672665291
The trailer. you need to stop replying, you're ruining everybodies day.
>>672665140
I just watched the orig. Ghostbusters last weekend and boy has it aged badly. The main cast is a bunch of annoying hipster doofuses. Some good supporting actors though.
>>672665227
That sounds mighty american to me
>>672660397
Did they have a Neanderthal write that article?
>>672660484
god damn she must've been holding that one in for weeks.
>>672660397
i love how she went to page 5 of the comments to finally find some comments supporting her stupid anti wymen theory, while the comments on the first pages clearly state it's just a shit movie
fucking feminism... can't wait for the day this whole shit crumbles under their asses
I loved the trailer because even though it was just 2 minutes long, the blatant racism was very obvious. 10/10.
>>672665461
Yeah because America used to make classic films now it makes this shit that I'm forced to see and hear about.
>>672663019
this movie has been heavily critizied by whining menisists for ruining the mad max series with too many female characters so......this is actually a counter example
>>672665313
You missed the entire point of what I was saying and then I pointed it out.
>>672665537
According to the internet, in real life it was one of the most successful movies made by an Australian director ever.
>>672665405
Right now as we speak there are angry Japanese business men throwing chairs through walls at there big bukaki meeting at Sony HQ.
>>672665566
You attempted to speak for everyone else, I provided some other possibles, nothing difficult there.
>>672660484
Lost it
>forehead vein of fuckshitfuck.jpeg
>>672665372
But you can't change James Bond.
Ghostbusters you can though as gender isn't implied by its name.
>>672665388
id love to meet her too. but show me a man who would do that. you're just fucking retarded for thinking all men are strong and amazing and all women are weak and lame. its just pure stupidity, all humans on earth are indiviuals with individual abilities, and being a man or being a woman doesnt mean shit.
>>672665426
*your
>>672665653
Yeah I wouldn't be surprised if the movie gets cancelled but knowing Sony they will probably push this out to see what happens.
>>672665653
Awesome
>>672665230
Implying any girl whos a feminist looks this good.
>>672665388
Theres quite a few women in the military and security industry who could probably pull something like that off and theres even a few olympic athlete women who could probably do it if they were as trained as John McClane.
>>672660484
the32ndflavor.webm
>>672660397
>all female ghostbusters cast because the men are all fighting real shit like isis
>>672665739
>all men
Well being on here is evident that the precentage of men who could actually accomplish what was done in he movie is close to none but stand a better chance being more physically capable 90% of woman I met would go into shock after stepping on broken glass so there's that.
>>672660397
>all female cast.
I'm pretty sure the black one has a Y chromosome.
>>672663019
>>672663105
>>672665537
>the only way a woman could ever pull that off is in a different dimension where women have no choice but to fight or become (pic related)
actually apart from the eccentric flame-throwing guitars it paints a pretty accurate end of the world scenario, especially for the inclusion of pic related
My favourite thing about all this, is that a thread like this can divulge into such batshit madness, and insecure men will still turn around and say, "3rd wave feminism has gone too far! We don't need feminism anymore!"
Why is everyone so reactionary now. The internet should be a place of progressivism.
>>672665970
The internet is a place for people to let out that little weirdness that they have inside them and for some people like most people on this site theres a lot of weirdness. Theres nothing progressive about it.
>>672665159
>cool women
Are you talking about dead girls? Cause no woman is cool. I used to think Lara Croft was cool but turns out its just the character which is made up, the actress is lame.
Same with every other woman.
Requesting the gif of the girl soldier who starts crying after shooting a gun.
>>672664100
>>672664917
>who is Sarah Connor?
>who is Ripley?
16yo edgelord detected
>>672665937
Yeah but lets be honest without the metal its basically transformers
>>672665776
er hello?
>>672666038
Still such a waste of opportunity.
>>672665313
>>672665566
>being reasonable on /b/
>>672664100
If a woman was the lead in the die hard movies she would have use her powers of passive aggressive to win. And if she lost she'd be all like "this shit is sexist".
>>672665937
I have no idea why that movie was nominated for an Academy Award. It basically didn't even have a story.
>>672666089
You should put that back in the ocean where it came from
1. The movie is a giant failure simply because you can't rework a classic like that just by slapping it with political correctness and calling it a day.
2. You are all lonely, bitter misogynists for waging war on this silly shit. You know you are, and I'm not gonna bother telling you to improve - because you are not going to. Just be aware that you ARE just as bad as the circlejerkers at tumblr.
>>672665906
so you're agreeing with me that watching a man do that shit is extremely unrealistic as well, but you're willing to believe and like it, because then you can feel strong like you could do this shit yourself, but if you'd watch a woman do it, even though its equally unrealistic, you'd feel emasculated like the little bitch you are :)
>>672666089
>>672665776
>looks this good
Its a fucking drawing you weaboo faggot. Go mix with real human women.
>>672660803
i am surprised the SJWs arent flipping their shit that the black one is the scientific illiterate one.
>>672666046
Cool woman - masculine woman
is it weird i am attracted to bi women mostly? Not through choice they just happen to be bi.
Maybe its the subjugation of a stronger cunt
>>672666150
depends what the jews wanna promote that year
they'd nominate miley cyrus twerking non-stop for 2 hours if possible
>>672666063
real life
>sarah connor takes one hit from a dude and it's all over.
>>672660929
Truth
>>672666113
Yeah but the internet lets us waste that potential even further because instead of doing something productive most of us are sitting here on this site(Which is somewhat productive), watching youtube videos, or streaming things. The internet is just a tool of procrastination and satiation for most people.
>>672666233
They are though
this is what i think of it
>>672666257
it's just a general subjective preference, nothing to worry about.
Two words...LOUD NEGRO
>>672666046
honestly angelina jolie is a babe and as cool as it gets, she's a thousand times more badass than 99% of men so......bullshit.
>>672666207
Not sure how you managed to misinterpret that so poorly, I'm saying in general men have a more mental and physical capability to handle extream situations than a woman would. But again this is /b/ so I'm going to chalk it up to you being autistic and not having enough reading comprehension to understand what I just typed even means.
>>672665937
The lastest max max movie was fucking garbage. I'll admit, I haven't seen any of the others so I was like why the fuck are they driving in the desert for 2 hours?
>>672666348
>Big words
>>672666257
>being attracted to masculine women
Youre lowkey gay bro.
Cut out the half measures, just obtain a masculine guy, why go for poor masculinity if you could go full bearmode.
>>672660397
I didnt like it because it looked shit, afterwards I thought could it be the all female cast? But i think if you had the original cast it would still be a shit movie, it just looks dumb
>>672666046
nah there are some cool women. few and far between. but it's the same with men, very few are any good.
>>672666467
Nah i love big asses and dds bruh, its not like ive not considered that, but gay intimacy makes me physically recoil
>>672666567
Youre just bigoted.
>>672662014
this movie wasnt dumb because of a female lead, it was just fucking dumb full stop
>>672666278
Why do you get so insecure at the thought of strong women that you've adopted such a denial to it?
>>672666233
If you made that meme yourself you sir are a legend.
>>672666534
Yeah that was my thought. If you swap the old cast for the new one you get a shitty modernized parody of the old movie.
>>672666635
Have gay friends
>>672666412
men might have a slight advantage when it comes to physical strength and reading maps, but women generally have a bigger social and emotional intelligence and there is no difference in IQ scores.. so it always depends on how you define intelligence. plus its fucking idiotic to think that "women" in general couldnt pull it off, there might be statistic differences between the genders, but that doesnt mean that one individual that happens to be female could be stronger than most males... there are women who are stronger than the average man, there are men with higher emotional/social intelligence than the average woman, so thinking no woman could do something just because she's a woman is just bullshit.
>>672666648
I agree it was that and many other reasons aswell on top of it.
>>672660397
I disliked it because it gave away too many plot points. Typical US-market trailer.
>>672666842
Go back to tumblr you landwhale.
>>672666842
Women can do a lot of things but when they do they usually make things worse and then a man has to step in and repair it.
>>672666920
even on /b/, people like you always look like the stupid one when you do that in situations like this.
Work on your timing anon. Save that shit for when you're talking to actual feminazis or trolls.
>>672666424
>why the fuck are they driving in the desert for 2 hours?
It doesn't really matter why. The desert is just a huge set-piece for a non-stop, gratuitous action movie, which it does a very good job of being.
>>672660397
This thread needs more Kylie.
>>672666842
Women are inferior creatures, their sole purpose on this life is to fulfil men's sexual needs, a living (and annoying) cock sleeve, there's no way in hell that a woman can beat a man a 1 on 1
>>672660397
SCREW GHOST BUSTERS THIS OTHER MOVIE IS GOING TO BE EPIC
>>672667064
>Moby dick detected
>>672667234
the edge
No more
>>672664790
Mike and Molly
>>672667334
The harpoons, man them!
>>672667218
instant boner,
who is this beauty?
>>672667434
you're right, great action movie aimed at straight male menistÃsts :P
>>672667234
Who broke your heart?
Oh no were getting another version of GB3 aswell
>>672664790
Stfu female cunt.
These are all good movies with many others people posted with good female leads.
I hate you.
>>672667636
Cis scum
>>672667625
KylieGriffin from Xtreme Ghost Busters, first childhood fap
>>672664790
>implying uma thurman's character from kill bill isnt strong
>implying women can't be independent and attractive
>implying men want to have sex with "objects" and not rational human beings
Yes I took the b8
>>672666089
>bait
Saging this thread now, just baiters.
>>672664790
Forreal fuck off. Most strong intelligent females who are actually strong and intelligent are physically fit and very attractive because they take care of their bodies and themselves. If you're a woman and you think you're strong and intelligent but don't have a high school diploma or have a useless degree and aren't physically fit you're actually a dumb cunt.
>>672664790
A League of their Own
>>672661478
This.
It's like a silence of the lambs remake starring Will Ferrell. I wanted some decent sci-fi.
>>672661603
You forget the shapekin Tumblrina snowflakes. They will somehow find it offensive and oppressive.
We should ban humor and happiness
>>672667218
Also probably why i am only really attracted to goth girls.
>>672667672
>>672667804
i didnt say the movies arent good, i didnt say women cant be strong AND sexy, i just pointed out that these female characters are most likely accept by a straight male crowd only if she is a hot babe and not just an awesome person they dont want to fuck.
>>672667242
Lol nice meme Xd
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=55okc5XM6Uo
>>672667242
who watches ghost busters ... thats for oldfags
the new and exciting movie is this
>>672667804
you're on /b/
Most people here prefer to have an objectified woman because rational human beings don't want them.
(neither do women the way they want them to be actually exist, but that's beside the point)
>>672664790
Trust me Sigourney Weaver as Ripply in Aliens is not attractive and She did a great Job I couldn't see anyone else but Sigourney Weaver playing the part as well as she did, neither do I find myself attracted to Jackie Brown but none the less great character. There's plenty of other good movies T.V show's etc with females that we as men think are brilliant entertaining funny smart etc so stop this feminazi bullshit.
>>672668110
So would you rather eat a sandwich with tasty filling and shitty bread, or one that's good all around?
Movies are a visual experience, surely men want a movie that's pleasing visually as well as intellectually; as long as the character's thoughts and motivations take some priority there's nothing wrong with that
>>672660397
this is the main problem tbqh
>>672667850
this just proves that you see every woman as a sex object and not as a real person with a value beyond how fuckable she is...
>>672666233
Yes, they are
>>672667769
shit you get a disease when you touch her ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a7LBo8sr6Oo
instant boner kill...
>>672668289
then why are most guys in movies so ugly? thats right, so losers like you can identify with them. the point is most hollywood movies are made by straight white men, for straight white men, and it just gets boring.
>>672668330
Men don't want sex with objects, a grand majority of people would rather have sex with some sort of human beings
I don't get this feminist bullshit, being attracted to someone doesn't dehumanize them at all
>>672664790
Female lead from (500) Days of Summer.
Female lead from Blue Valentine.
Deborah from Everybody Loves Raymond.
Female lead from Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind.
Ellen Ripley from the Alien franchise.
Female lead from You're Next.
Sarah Connor from Terminator 2.
Female lead from Edge of Tomorrow.
Furiosa from Max Max Fury Road.
Female lead from Don Jon.
Pan from Pan's Labyrinth.
Each and every one of these are either incredibly realistic portrayals of women, or represent them as strong, independent and clever, without accentuating their sexuality beyond recognising them as beautiful.
That's just from the top of my head.
>>672660484
This is fake. They pumped fake shit into her ass. Notice how its all the same consistency/color, and it comes out like it was playdoh and her anus was the mold.
they do it a lot in japanese porn
>>672668311
>Checked
Honestly this, replace the fat chicks with 10/10s and ill go watch it
>>672666838
and you dont have sex with any of them?
Bigot
The only reason I'm gonna watch it is cause that big burely black woman
>>672668539
i have sex with what i want fag
>>672666842
>emotional intelligence
You dont even know your own emotions, let alone anyone elses, besides, how is that gonna help you in a fight. Some guys swings a fist at you, you analyze his emotions and see that he had a tough childhood.
Useless skill to have.
>>672668479
>ad hominem
>all men in movies are ugly
>made for straight white men
You're entirely wrong. I can name tons of movies not made for men (because in the western world moviemakers do have to cater to the women that make up half the population) or made for everyone, and there are as many attractive men as attractive women (and ugly men as ugly women) in film
>>672668519
yeah so? i know that movies that arent sexist exist in the world you retard, would be pretty fucking depressing if they didnt, but that wasnt my point.
>>672668701
>name one movie with a strong, intelligent female lead that doesnt just look like your dream sex object. ;)
I named eleven.
>>672664790
I love movies about a talking dog as much as the next guy, but dogs don't talk and are therefore unrealistic. If the movie strives for realism then the female lead should not be strong, independent or intelligent because these are three traits that women are not.
>>672668652
we dont live in the stoneage anymore, physical strength actually has no meaning in a civilized society, understanding the emottions of other people on the other hand is extremely important.
>>672668701
Idiot, you asked to name one movie without a "sex object" so he named a ton of them
>inb4 mansplaining
>>672668745
we were talking about action movies aimed at straight guys..
>>672662525
Hitler will grant me dubs
>>672668795
>physical strength actually has no meaning in a civilized society, understanding the emottions of other people on the other hand is extremely important.
You're outgrowing this place
>>672668795
Then obviously action movies arent for women, since youre not fitted for action. Your domain is gossip and being a desperate housewife.
>>672668526
If they had ONE funny character, and didn't turn the black chick into into an offensive racial stereotype, the trailer may not have been so bad.
>>672668868
There are action movies named at straight guys, and tons of movies (fifty shades of grey for instance) aimed at women
What the fuck is wrong with having a target audience?
>>672660397
I'm all for mostly female cast, just don't include that fucking whale Melissa.
She's a no talent bitch.
All this is really is a female power movie. I guarantee at least one of them is gay.
Having a gay character is apparently the cool thing to do in Hollywood.
Christ they made like a big announcement that a character is queer in the next Star Wars.
Next step is a retarded Porkins yelling "potato" as he fires torpedos at the next Star Destroyer, hell he already has the helmet.
The only redeeming thing about this trailer is that Ernie Hudson is reprising his role.
>>672668868
>Ellen Ripley from the Alien franchise
action/horror
>Female lead from You're Next
action/horror
>Female lead from Edge of Tomorrow
action
>Sarah Connor from Terminator 2
action/sci-fi
All attractive, all smart, all strong, none sexualized.
>>672668519
Well put , Infact as a man I find it more attractive in a women if they are smart funny , intelligent and have a good personality. If they only have looks and are a complete bitch we don't respect those ones at all. I'm sick of all the stupid feminazi's that call us sexist for literally everything and assume that all men are pigs , that's pritty sexist if you ask me. W wouldn't even count feminazi's as women because Women have a brain in there head.
>>672660397
Four women, doing strenuous exercise and making sensible well reasoned decisions to fight ghosts.
This is a retarded pitch for a movie.
>>672668962
>>672668962
This. No civilized person has an issue with an all-female case. We have an issue with it being marketed as a female power film that aims to replace or belittle men.
If you want good female characters, create them. Don't gender-swap amazing male characters and films.
The shittiest part is that most progressives don't understand that they're being used as a marketing device to promote an incredibly discriminating Hollywood. If putting a token faggot/nigger/woman in their movie guarantees a whole audience will talk positively about it, they'll do it.
>>672669160
>quoting a movie character who only says that stuff because he's lonely and miserable, and stops doing that when a woman helps him out of it
>>672669360
Don't know if you agree, but I did find Aliens and Mad Max a good exception.
Force Awakens on the other hand annoyed the shit out of me
>stop grabbing my hand
>I can take care of myself
>omg such strong woman
>>672669360
You see the problem is we're expecting people to think and use reasoning and logic rather than lunacy and political correctness.
>>672669399
>Implying he changed his opinions on women
He wanted sex and female companionship. But he most definitely didn't change his views on women lol
>>672669514
Because Alien and Mad Max was written and directed by sensible human beings who understand the world isn't some fucking tug-of-war political dribble.
Alien and Mad Max was targeted to an audience without gender in mind, but rather just people who might actually fucking want to watch a good horror/action movie. Just think of Fury Road. You could swap Max and Furiosa's gender and the movie would essentially be the exact same.
Star Wars is pop culture phenomenon, and it's being produced by Disney. They know their main audience is now <25 left-wing progressives who live to promote some weird, aggressive state of equality. So when something isn't a white man in a lead role, they adore it.
>>672669874
Is that seriously how you interpreted the movie or was that just you really wanting to see it that way?
>>672669939
>So when something isn't a white man in a lead role, they adore it
What made that part funny is that his character's role was nothing different from being the R2 of this episode.
Literally the only relevance he ultimately had was knowing a map.
