I'm convinced that everyone who thinks marijuana should be legalized is a pot smoker.
>>672075032
Stay retarded.
About 90% of us.
>>672075032
It's never EVERYONE. But the vast majority are I guess
And of course, the Marxist Jew media is always trying to shove pro-weed propaganda down our throats. Only degenerate cucks buy into it. You're not degenerate cucks, are you, /b/?
>>672075032
So what. Its an effect that wears off in 2 hours or so when smoked and causes a mildly pleasant stimulation not unlike a few beers or a couple stong cups of coffee.
Therer's no real legit reason for it to be illegal besides creating a steady cash flow for prisons and police forces. Neither of which need it and could do without it just fine, in fact it might even free up police resources and prisons for the real criminals.
>>672076333
Who gives a fuck? Everyone who who doesn't smoke weed is against it.
I've been smoking for a year now and my class grads casually grew over the time period I've been smoking. now I'm not going to deny you, there are some very very minor drawbacks to the herb but overall 10/10. even if it was illegal where I live i'd still be buying it
>>672076908
How does that change the fact that only degenerate stoners are pro-legalization?
Wrong, I have only smoked once and I am 100% for it.
>>672077055
How many hours ago was that? Or minutes?
I don't smoke pot, but I think it should be legal. It's not like it's killing people or anything.
>>672077245
About a year.
>>672077363
Well, they're killing themselves the same way drinkers and cigarette smokers are killing themselves.
>>672075032
Correct.
Pot smoking degenerates.
>>672078242
Alcoholics and cig smokers are free to choose that. Why is it wrong for a pot smoker?
>I had this same argument with a cop in 6th grade when they came to the school preaching the dangers of drug use.
Even before I smoked Chronic, I was always for the legalization of weed. It would bring in a lot of tax revenue and it does VERY minimal harm to the body.
>>672078242
This b8 is too weak, come back tomorrow with some better stuff.
>>672078242
And this proves what?
>>672078385
Exactly. Supporting legalization should be a crime in and of itself.
>>672078462
>free to choose that
Not when it endangers other people
>>672079043
Fair enough. Explain to me how a person smoking pot endangers other people.
It all starts with a bong kids
>>672079264
Some people are stupid enough to do things like driving while high, which although it may not impair the senses as much as being drunk, is still an issue. I'll admit there hasn't been a solid study done on that though.
From personal experience, (some) people get a little too careless while high. Either that, or there just happens to be a weird majority of pot smokers who happen to also be careless people That's a factor to look into.
>>672078940
So you're against the first amaendment?
>>672079472
thats a crack pipe fo' sho' doe'
>>672079955
Only when it endangers the moral structure of society.
>>672079472
It is not the THC that makes you a looser.
It is because of the bongs and the way people inhale insane amounts of crap.
Only idiots, who want to get cancer, smoke them.
They also almost never clean them.
Seth is that you...
>>672080023
Take your morals to Africa
>>672079930
Seriously, you fag:
In an dark alley, who would you rather like to pass: Some drunk folks or stoned ones?
Your argument is so wrong.
>>672079930
A lot of people live normal, productive lives, while enjoying a smoke every now and then.
i am a libertarian and i have schizotypal disorder so i do not do drugs because i do not want to develop full blown schizophrenia
i even do not drink alcohol, also no cigateres
>>672075896
I hope you acquire severe neurological problems friend. You may have a change in perspective. And if you drink alcohol your a shit tier educated hypocrite
>>672075032
either a potsmoker or a wannabe (mostly 12y.o. faggots)
>>672075032
>does not smoke pot
>supports its legalization
>>672078242
>there you go with your crazy speculations
>>672080219
Considering how personally offended you sound, I'm guessing you're a stoner or an avid supporter.
I'm playing devil's advocate, trying to get some ideas here. I'm not against it really, but I do like to try to consider how safe it is.
>>672080023
What are you a Muslim?
>>672079930
I have drove while high many times, no accidents, in fact I'm even more aware and careful than when I'm not stoned. I know a guy who smokes weed constantly, carries it around in a tobbacco pouch and loads up a pipe without a care in the world, at work, driving, whatever. He's never been in a accident either. Oddly enough he's never been arrested, maybe he's just extremely lucky...
Either way, I'd rather not allow pot and driving, because maybe I'm just a better driver than most or lucky. But I'd rather pass a high driver on the highway than a drunk one. My reaction times and awareness of my surroundings are enhanced while high, am I an exception?
>>672081129
No. Are you a Jew?
consider picrel
>>672080612
>you're
Always use correct spelling and grammar when insulting people on the internet.
eval()▲
▲▲
if this works i will be so happy
>>672078940
>having an opinion that I disagree with should be a crime
I know you'll disagree, but you're an objectively stupid person.
>>672081357
Fuck you're right
>>672081540
nope still newfag
>>672081029
I don't know if anyone told you, but you die at the end whether or not you do drugs and have fun.
>>672081584
alt 0129
space
alt0129
alt30
enter
alt30
space
alt30
>>672076802
No way, I think total population breaks down more like this:
10% active, daily smokers want it legal
25% occasional smokers, want it legal but don't give enough of a shit to make noise IRL
25% people that would smoke anywhere from a little to a lot but don't because illegal
20% people that don't give a fuck either way
5% people that legit don't want it legal for moral reasons
10% people that are just jelly and/or had a bad experience with either pot or a pothead
5% people that have a monetary interest in it remaining illegal but probably smoke anyway because rich and will never get busted for it.
And if you added those up to see if they equal 100% you're probably too sober to be having this conversation.
>>672081820
▲
▲ ▲
I have doubts anon
>>672081029
I am inclined towards legalization for recreational use.
The drug is not 100% safe, everyone with a brain cell or two knows that. Especially, if you smoke it. There is also a certain, not too small risk, that you might be predispositioned to have THC trigger some sort of serious psychological conditions, but I can't remember what exactly it was.
The LD50 for THC is something about 10 kilograms.
>>672081791
underrated post
>>672082028
oops put a space after the second alt0129
>>672082241
Newfag :3
>>672075032
I can only speak for myself, but I for one was "pro green" several years before I even tried it.
as opposed to the poor souls who are peer pressured into it.
>>672079930
You've never smoked weed have you?
>>672080048
vaping all day breh
>>672082048
>and the extraordinarily high numbers of social smokers, there are simply no credible medical reports to suggest that consuming marijuana has caused a single death. By contrast aspirin, a commonly used, over-the-counter medicine, causes hundreds of deaths each year.
>>672082552
>causes hundreds of deaths each year
Do you mean tens of thousands?
>>672082741
German doctors kill 19.000 people a year by accident.
http://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/diagnose/aok-krankenhaus-report-2014-19-000-tote-durch-behandlungsfehler-a-944615.html
I dare you to name one person who doesn't smoke weed and thinks it should be legal.
>>672083054
And no, their names are not "Mengele"
>>672075032
I dont smoke anymore. But obviously it should be legal. So there ya go
>>672083151
My father.
>>672083151
I know several such persons.
The names wouldn't help much, right?
Martin, Stefan, Peter.
>>672075032
well that makes sense really
I mean if a person who's never drank in their life came up and said "hey lets ban alcohol because hey look at all these shitheads getting drunk & violent" you'd say something along the lines of "well you've never tried it"
>>672077036
what do you expect when if anyone comes out in support of it they're 'degenerate stoners'
>>672082552
speaking generally, most people who use alcohol don't drink every day
most people who use legal over the counter drugs can still get on with their lives without their abilities being affected by it to an extent where their productivity is destroyed
drugs that are illegal, fuck peoples motivation and ability to work a job, raise kids, stay away from crime to fund a habit
that's why illegal drugs are illegal, to prevent society from descending into total degeneracy
argue if you want, and you can bring up alcoholics or successful drug users,
but the bottom line is it's not about yours, or anyone else's health, its about productivity and moral standards
>>672083054
I was going to read that article, but then it was in German and I said fuck it. There are about 225,000 doctor/hospital caused deaths a year in the US alone.
>>672083151
Bernie Sanders
>>672083407
Spot on.
>needing to smoke to have fun
Losers.
>>672083590
He's a socialist Democrat Jew. Of course he smokes weed.
bait from OP tait
was at a restaurant that's also a pub and brewery, and as my group of friends and I (quite a few who had smoked before heading over) were waiting for a table, a fight broke out between a bunch of drunk people. I don't think that would have happened if they were high.
>>672075032
Honestly, what are the arguments against it? There is literally 0 downside. Unless you're a full on prohibitionist and think alcohol should be illegal again as well, then at least we can have that argument. It comes down to pragmatism, prohibition simply doesn't work.
>>672083407
Alcohol makes people agressive and they hit their spouses and kids. I wouldn't consider that improving a society. Also, there are a lot of pot smokers, who are working in all kinds of jobs. I know a lot of academic folks, who like to smoke. Your argument seems invalid, a study might be interesting.
Also, if you're interested in why Marihuana is illegal: Research Harry Anslinger. The reason was a economical one (to protect DuPont's newly invented Nylon)
>>672084091
To stoners, there is no downside. But obviously there are downsides, or else people who don't smoke weed would support it, too.
>>672083407
>yeah, because this country was built on a strong moral standards, that's why our politicians work so hard to do what the majority of people want them to
oh, wait...
>if the sarcasm flew over your head, this country was built on RIGHTS, not morals.
>>672084216
It's annoying when stoners have to make sure people get that they smoke. It's like the new vegan think.
>>672084263
You failed to provide proof for this false claim. I've heard a lot of professionals advocate legalization.
Also, we could use the money they waste on hunting stoners to hunt actual criminals.
>>672084263
>there are downsides because I say so
typical prohibition brainwashing
It would take someone who didn't smoke weed to come up with a valid argument for legalizing a drug they don't use.
>>672083407
Generally speaking, people who use illegal narcotics don't use them everyday.
Most people who use illegal drugs still get on with their lives without their abilities being affected by it to an extent where their productivity is destroyed.
Drugs that are illegal, are illegal because certain companies, individuals, and entities lobbied to make it illegal; usually because whatever drug detracted from their profits.
That's why drugs are illegal, to protect various industries and discriminate against their competition in the vice market. (e.g. why the alcohol industry is lobbying heavily against legal marijuana)
Argue if you want, you can bring up dope fiends or the total permeation of alcohol into every crevice of society.
The bottom line is that it's not about whether or not it kills you, it's about the fact that major American companies aren't producing the products and they're not being taxed.
>>672084486
Are you just hating smokers, because you know a bunch of bad examples? Perhaps change your residence, your neighbours apparently suck.
Idiots will be idiots, THC doesn't cure that.
>>672084585
It is not your body. End of argument.
I'm assuming all the posters here who disagree with my OP are too ashamed to admit they smoke weed, unless they already admitted to it.
>>672083407
>moral standards
not only the irony considering all the legislation that allows companies to be, just the biggest shitheads possible
but pot was originally made illegal since black people smoked it way back when racism was accepted
fucking 'moral standards' is such a bullshit reason with all the immoral shit allowed by govs
>oh you want to raise the price of this lifesaving drug?
>GO RIGHT AHEAD, RAISE IT 10000%
>so you're sick and need treatment or else you're going to die at 26?
>HAHAHA GO FUCK YOURSELF, PAY UP OR DIE MOTHERFUCKER
you can't seriously claim 'moral standards' as a reason to not allow a relatively harmless recreational drug, that also has some medicinal properties, when you implicitly kill people every day through sheer negligence or some misguided sense of capitalism
>>672084263
Misconceived perceptions. People who don't smoke it or never have, do not have the perspective to determine if it is worth having the right to choose.
It's like a permavirgin asexual declaring that sex should be illegal because it's degenerate. Saying all babies should be artificially inseminated by a doctor in a lab with sperm and an egg from the mother and fathers, then placed inside the womb.
>>672084585
I've never smoked weed. Recently I've started to side with the legalization side. Not for my own benefit, but just because the benefits for the country as a whole seems worth it. And I have buddies to do smoke, and there's never really been any incidients. They're annoying as fuck about it though, but yeah.
>>672084216
your post seems to disregard my main point
generally speaking, the majority of potheads are lazy, non motivated man children who play video games all day instead of finding jobs
there may be academics, or entrepreneurs or generally successful people who take all kinds of drugs, but they are in the vast minority.
nobody has ever argued alcohol improves a society, and once again, using common sense tells us, most people who drink alcohol, don't have problems with violence, again your talking about a small minority
try looking at the big picture, people who have problems with violence when they use drink booze, are probably already violent people
just like people who spend their lives being lazy and smoking pot are probably already lazy,
but the point is, we can tolerate a few wife beaters because that is a crime too, we can lock those fuckers up
we can't lock people up for watching family guy and smoking herb all day if we legalize drugs
degeneracy from prostitutes and thieves funding their habit will only get worse if we tell people its no longer a crime to do crack and meth
think about it
>argument seems invalid
>study might be interesting
think about it, a study isn't necessary here, its literally common sense
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2LGv-6p7gGg
>>672083407
>Productivity
>Moral standards
They better ban the fucking internet then.
>>672084263
THC (the active chemical in marijuana) has been shown to encourage new brain cell growth.
sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/10/051016083817.htm?
The National Cancer Institute has conducted research which indicated that marijuana can inhibit cancer cell growth, decrease inflammation, and even cause cancer cell death.
naturalsociety.com/marijuana-kills-cancer-cells-admits-the-u-s-national-cancer-institute/
Tell me again what the downsides are...
>>672084873
>because a random anon knows more about your body than you do
stop sounding like the government
>>672075896
Fuck yeah that's a badass pic dude
>>672085384
I just don't believe that the majority of smokers are lazy. Where do you get your numbers from? In my personal sphere, it is certainly not the case.
>>672085384
and the majority of alcoholics beat their wives
bullshitting's easy when you make sweeping generalizations
>>672085055
That's a stupid argument.
Mostly because this follows if I use your logic:
Anyone who has never had an abortion does not have the perspective to determine if it's worth having the right to choose.
>>672085822
well, yeah, actually
>>672075032
no shit sherlock
>>672085384
>Statistics Source: my ass
>>672085506
Everyone laughs at you behind your back for being a stoner
>>672084216
look what i found:
>>672085482
>>672085384
>we can't lock people up for watching family guy and smoking herb all day if we legalize drugs
Personally, I believe that is a shitty way to live your precious life, I at least accept thast I don't have the right to tell someone that it's wrong if thats what they want to do with their life. Its not harming anyone but themselves and probably not even then so what right do you have to say your way of living is better than the way another person chooses to live?
>>672085998
Yeah, it's a stupid argument, or yeah, you should have to have had an abortion to cast a vote on it?
>>672084938
>>672084317
first of all, i'm not an american, i could care less about your politics
secondly
when I am talking about moral standards as a reason not to legalize drugs, your butt hurt shows when you recite all the other morally wrong things going on
i never said we live in a perfect world
my point about moral standards relates to how drug people raise their kids
the same way its wrong for kids to be raised in a family of alcoholics
you would have people going to work stoned, a lot more than we already see now,
mistakes will be made, lives will be put at risk, money will be lost, all because stoners think nobody can tell they are stoned, which is actually sometimes the case
>>672086144
You mean all my employees?
That's fine, they can laugh at me as long as they do their jobs.
>>672086346
Please keep your morals in your pants.
Not everyone thinks the same as you do about what is good or bad.
You sound like a religous person.
>>672086399
Floor supervisor at Wallmart?
never touched it but I do believe it should be legalized.
Reasoning: companies and businesses don't have to hire people if they are smokers and that goes for pot smokers too.
>>672086290
there is a public contract that western civilization lives by
you don't have the right to a western quality of life, emergency services, education, opportunity if you don't agree to the workload and expectation
if you aren't willing to work hard, pay taxes, and contribute to society, you are a degenerate, and most likely a nigger
i don't have a problem with you living like that, just move to a third world country first
most people who complain about western society and the way we live, would have a hard time explaining a better system, or place to live
>>672086668
They wouldn't be MY employees if I didn't own the business, and sadly I don't own Walmart.
Owner/Operator Armada Moving Services
>>672086308
that you should've had an abortion to cast a vote
or at the very least your opinion should be considered higher than anyone elses on the topic
It's the same reason you don't let your green grocer discuss high level rocket physics on national tv, you're just not qualified on the subject
>>672086346
>you would have people going to work stoned, a lot more than we already see now,
In some jobs this would give them an advantage, I find weed makes me think creatively outside the box, and more often than not, they're very good ideas. This can prove very advantageous in certain fields of work I'm sure you can agree. Also, I'm really high right now.
>>672086752
Now that is a bullshit law.
Why would that kind of discrimination make sense?
Are they afraid, people will take cigarette breaks?
>>672086552
not everyone, but most people do, and that's why its illegal, stay mad, stay wasting your life smoking your lies, stay cucked
>>672087025
more-over
how does some random bumfuck getting an abortion effect YOU?
I can tell you now it doesn't & if you think it does then you'd have to be just several shades of narcissist prick
The same goes for pot once its regulated, which is basically the same laws as alcohol & second hand cigarette smoke
>>672087343
>Majority is against legalization
So, why are you currently legalizing it, then?
I think, especially in the US, this would be pretty impossible without a majority
>>672087025
women's body is her property (self-ownership) and her child is built out of women's resources so the child is her property and everyone can do whatever he/she/it wants to do with her/its/her property
>>672086942
So in other words, if a person doesn't make their way in life exactly the same way as you do (or society does) than their methods are wrong?
What if this family guy watching degenerate pot smoker is also a master self-taught horticulturist who grows marijuana plants in their basement sells it and lives off the proceeds? They get free weed to smoke and can sit at home enjoying their favorite mindless television shit.
Make an argument that actually has some merit.
>>672087343
really, most people do because they're told to do so
~5% are militant enough to think it was their idea
>>672087202
yeah, maybe if you are working in the creative industries, it might be slightly more of an advantage to be stoned during the small amount of time you have to think of ideas
but most of the time when you are working on the ideas you came up with and trying to meet a deadline, it is a disadvantage
i was talking about people who work normal jobs, that aren't
>>672087796
I bet that guy would also oppose any kind of social politics or even unconditional income.
>mimimi
>I had it hard, so everyone else should suffer, too
>>672087480
I'm not arguing against marijuana. I'm just saying that limiting input on any issue to only those who have been directly affected by it doesn't make sense. I've never been to war but I have an opinion on sending my countrymen to risk their lives. I'm not a scientist and have never been to space, but I think we should invest in interplanetary scientific exploration.
>>672075032
I'm am not, but I do. I can't handle jail time so no, I don't and haven't. Plus, I'd probably end up trying to buy it from a narc
>>672087883
>i was talking about people who work normal jobs, that aren't
so then they just don't smoke at/during work
or, you know, they'd get fired
do you really believe that people are actually THAT stupid?
do you really believe that you're that stupid?
>>672086668
Somebody's gotta do it you fag other than just sitting in your grandma's basement you bitch
>wants to ban the legalization of a drug that has been proven to cure almost a 100 different kinds of cancer
>im convinced people who thinks like this, do so because a stoner in high school thought they were uncool for not smoking weed
>caring enough about illogical opinions to seriously wanting the cure for cancer to be illegal
>>672088368
Narcs don't sell pot. It's a misdemeanor virtually everywhere that isn't in Asia or the Middle East.
>>672087761
clearly you have a twisted view of productivity, and making a way in life
good luck mate, from what you just posted i get the feeling you're gonna need it
who do you think he will sell to? more people who lay on their ass watching tv doing nothing?
growing a plant isn't a trade, if it was legal, large companies would take over
he might work for one of them, but the scenario you just said is literally as retarded as you must be to think it up
working a 9-5 job is a way of making a living,
mass producing pot will stop other people from wanting to / being able to work a 9-5 job
this isn't rocket science, but pot smokers will literally tell themselves anything to rationalize their nonsense
>>672079930
Hurr durr, driving while high
>alcohol is legal
So what is your point? Why should alcohol be legal, if marijuana isn't?
>>672088619
we have a tradition of alcohol using
>>672088754
Thomas Jefferson grew hemp. What's your point with the appeal to tradition?
>>672075032
Never touched weed. Think it should be legal still.
>>672081962
Why do active daily smokers want it legal? This seems silly.
At least I can't smoke it because it is not legal, but I want it legal so I can smoke it. People that break the law anyway should not even worry about what is legal and what is not legal.
>>672083712
More along the lines of you have more fun with.
>>672088617
Ad hominem incoming
>>672088131
An opinion without proper perspective has little value. You might have an opinion that you don't want your boys going off to war, but did you ever consider they might want to do it?
You have an opinion on exploring space but did you ever consider that the money invested in that might be better off spent on literally anything here on Earth, considering the costs of such endeavours for such little reward considering the given alternatives?
>>672075032
I advocate the legalization of Marijuana strictly because of my fathers PTSD. He's a 20 year veteran and has suffered with this illness since the Gulf War.
I personally have a generalized anxiety disorder, and I do smoke myself. I still advocate Medical Marijuana even if it would not be available for my petty shit.
>>672075191
/thread
>>672083151
I do not smoke it and I have not smoked it - but would LOVE for it to be legal. I'm a law abiding citizen for fuck's sake
>>672088617
Hey man, if they want to rot in front of the TV while smoking a billion bowls a day, let em. This is the free world, where you can do whatever the fuck you want, and suffer the natural consequences.
I like how stoners are saying I'm wrong while saying they smoke and without proving me wrong.
Yeah, that'll convince me.
>>672088131
which is why i said they should have more of an opinion, you know like an expert
but in an issue where only one effective person is going to be effected by the outcome, like if a women gets an abortion it's only ever going to effect her then sure, people who've had or are seeking abortions should have a much greater opinion
while an issue that could effect hundreds of thousands of people, to the whole of humanity, like going to war or advancing space exploration, then sure everyone can have some input, but even then its pretty limited to experts
also you can have as many opinions as you want on any subject but not get any actual input, you could protest a war up and down a street but it's not like your inputs going to be seriously considered, if you were a war vet then maybe, though that still proves my point
>>672088472
but they already do
are you that stupid to say this isn't true?
didnt finish typing
that arent in a creative job that people actually depend on, like bank tellers, or truck drivers, or crane operators or many hundreds of jobs that there are,
even a slight increase in the level of people smoking weed on the job will cause more shit to go down
the same way it would for any other drug
so why tempt fate, when there is no reason for it other than you want your stoned, can't think straight feeling without being scared your stinking your place up and evicted, or that you will get fired, or kicked out of college, or caught by police
literally all of your nonsense boils back down to your own petty fear
>>672088959
i am a libertarian myself but i understand a point, some people simply appeal to tradition like defenders of bull fights appeal to tradition- it is "our" culture
>>672089509
it's actually not, the debate is why it should or shouldn't be illegal, at the moment it is illegal
>>672088617
>growing a plant isn't a trade
what is our most important trade in the world
ƃuᴉɯɹɐɟ sʇᴉ :ɹǝlᴉods
>>672089242
Fun fact: It's not even THAT expensive, especially compared to the US military budget.
$610.096 billion for the military, EVERY YEAR#
Mars mission: 4 to 6 billion
Please go and die soon, you war hungry bastard.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States
http://www.mars-one.com/faq/finance-and-feasibility/how-much-does-the-mission-cost
>>672088754
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k76IGLi6jWI
>its tradition that makes it ok
>>672089773
>implying that anyone should have power over another human
>>672087013
Ooh, I reeealy hope you live where it's legal. Your gonna get v&
>>672079930
Pot affect the hipocampus, that short term memory, thats why you seem to forget little things when high. But alcohol has its effect on the cerebellum, thats equilibrium, coordination, etc. Thats why you can drive stoned but not drunk.
>>672089970
Fucking LESS THAN ONE PERCENT of the annual military spendings.
Not even considering the technological advances, this would bring
>>672089242
The sole and glaring problem with that line of thinking is that there is no all-knowing arbiter of who has the relevant experience and perspective. And even if there were, simply having experience in a field does not guarantee a correct, or even sane response.
>>672089847
and who controls farming?
that's right large companies who employ farmers
retard
they are still working 9-5 or probably 8-8 jobs, nothing is free dip shit
your point is still nonsense, and so is the rest of your reasons why it should be legal
>>672089997
it is a fiction...
>>672075032
you are an idiot.
Yes, almost all pot smokers are for legalization but if you think it is confined to just them, you must either live in the bible belt or be a complete recluse.
Gay
>>672090001
keep your jewish, nigger loving hippy bullshit to yourself the grown ups are talking
>>672090124
That's all Americucks seem to care about is weed. Our country has fallen hard.
>>672088524
THC does not cure cancer you stupid fucking dipwad faggot
>>672089614
>literally all of your nonsense boils back down to your own petty fear
how can people be this oblivious? how can you be so ironic?
I bet you're a trump supporter too
also explain to me how people aren't just drunk all the time on the job since apparently just a slight increase in people imbibing a drug results in some massive chaos
>>672089614
You seem to be under the impression that pot effects people in a negative way and therefore reflects poorly on their ability to perform a job, specifically menial tasked jobs. I can assure you, this is a very uneducated stance to position your argument. I can see all your pillars of logic tumbling around you crushing you and you don't. I can't understand that.
>>672089079
If it's legal people are not shunned because of it. I want it legal so that good old American capitalism will take hold and my topshelf will go below 5 dollars a gram. It will be cheaper and safer if it becomes legal and might even be considered a legitimate medicine by those who still view it as and illegal drug for niggers.
>>672090105
I do live where pot is legal, but even if I didn't why would I be arrested? I don't use or allow use of any drugs during work hours.
>>672090346
Ad hominem landed
>>672090292
Prove me wrong then.
>>672075032
no shit
>>672090405
While it doesn't cure cancer (there actually are studies which indicate possible benefits for fighting cancer, studies are inconclusive), it helps radiotherapy patiens cope with the side effects.
The drug also helps with a lot of other conditions.
I can also guarantee that everyone who doesn't smoke weed hates people who do. This isn't really about legalization, this is a culture war.
>>672090408
never said massive chaos
but unnecessary damage will be caused
its not necessary for you to be stoned, you want to be, but other than that there is no reason
so you can twist it whichever way you want but, more people intoxicated means more mistakes made, means shit has gone wrong
its astonishing how slow you fuckers are
i almost forgot you literally poison your own minds until all thought goes through a retard filter before you speak
>>672090405
Yea, cannabinoids inhibit cellular growth in cancer cells and interrupts the over abundance they provide keeping the cancer from growing. While it doesn't cure cancer, it does indeed help to control and fight it.
>>672090405
>shutting your eyes to scientific research and hard data because someone does something he doesnt like
the american educational system everyone, give a round of applause
>>672090818
This is an unfounded belief.
Show us credible numbers.
Just because you live in a shithole, doesn't mean, that the rest of the world is as shitty.
>>672090427
I used to smoke pot
I used to sell pot, large quantities, not small bags, I'm talking kilo's
i know what I'm talking about, I used to be on your side of the argument
it's only when you reach rock bottom that you see things for what they really are
>>672090346
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BD8TJ9gD6F0
>>672090446
I just want to walk into a gas station and buy a pack of joints, is that so much to ask?
>>672081962
>too sober for this discussion
Maybe that's like, the problem, maaaan. Always too fucked up to fix the problems, or too sober to see through the bullshit to find how or what needs to be.
>>672091102
Backward rednecks will ward back.
>>672090818
That is utter crap. It's literally not possible. You're saying that 62% of the state of Colorado's electorate were smoking pot before it was legalized.
>>672091276
wut
>>672075032
Agree fully.
>used to smoke pot
>"Legolas smonk!"
>no longer smoke pot
>found the light of being fully conscious of life around me
>fully against marijuana
Only pot smoking degenerates want pot legalized. Stay lazy, peasants.
>>672091309
Obviously so.
>>672091046
>rock bottom
What happen anon? Get arrested?
>>672091412
>lying on the internet
>>672091309
guess that depends on how many people voted
(not the guy who said what you were replying to)
continue your debate
>>672075032
Of course, why the fuck would you want something you've got no use for?
>>672091569
Because people should be about the greater good.
>>672091451
don't wanna get into exactly the hows and why's
too much typing of things people on here just won't accept because their mindset is so firmly set to defend cannabis at all costs
say anything and everything to disagree with anyone who calls it out for what it is
there is no point in me telling you, you simply won't see reason or believe
>>672091669
Agreed.
>>672091412
Smoke weed. Start company. Smoke weed. Run company. Smoke weed. Hire effective management and employees. Smoke weed. Get paid. Smoke weed. Get paid. etc...
Yeah, the whole COO lifestyle is super difficult. The most profitable company on Earth (Apple) was founded by pot smokers.
What you basically said was:
>I'm a lazy piece of shit that doesn't have the willpower to smoke and work. And because I suck, you all must suck too.
>>672092153
Who cares? Everyone hates Apple.
>>672076802
>Everyone who who doesn't smoke weed is against it.
so why are people who are not affected by something against it?
do you really sit at home and are angry that someone somewhere else smokes weed?
I feel like a lot of stoners would be against it if they knew what legalization really meant.
>>672092153
this
I've seen my share of looser stoners, but most of them were loosers to begin with.
>>672092303
>most profitable company on Earth
>everyone hates them
What.
>>672092316
Yeah, and so do all other non-users.
>>672091792
Ok, well then I'm just going to assume you are a massive fuckup cause I have a grow op here in BC and I make about 100K a year off it with nothing more than 5 lights in a 10x12 room for the past 4 years and I have no intention of working a shitty normal job. Now excuse me while I play my video games all day and smoke my weed, which by the way, is exquisite.
>>672092398
wat
>>672092483
>people who don't use apple hates them
I'm sensing a theme here
>>672078242
>the same way
Go back too school/Stay in school
>>672092153
Feels good to be literally doing this.
>tfw the exponential growth has started
>tfw i'll be a millionaire within a year if it keeps up
>tfw i now grow the greatest weed because i can afford to pamper my plants like fucking babies
Fuck i love being better than autistic people
>>672092512
and you call me the fuck up
it's only a matter of time and you will see why smoking weed all day fucks your life up
How can this site be anti-degeneracy, yet support a degenerate drug at the same time?
>>672092424
There are a disproportionately high number of drug users at both ends of the bell curve. Both highly intelligent and miserably stupid people tend to indulge in drug use and experimentation and much higher rates than the average person.
>>672092495
holy shit, your life must suck
>>672080447
What does anything, that you have posted, have to do with the general topic of this thread?
If it makes you feel any better, order a pizza.
>>672093028
No, my life is great, because I don't smoke weed like the rest of you.
>>672090382
What do you care about anon? I am genuinly interested.
I don't care, I don't smoke pot simply because i'm sure any sort of smoke inhalation isn't healthy and i'm happy enough already.
But I literally see nothing wrong with legalizing weed except people might be more aggressive when it comes to getting it
>>672093045
Will you buy me a pizza? You'd be my personal hero for the day.
>>672091102
joints would be taxed then
now you have tax-free (illegal) joints, support contr-economy,
AGORA
ANARCHY
ACTION
>>672092814
I exaggerate, I don't smoke all day or even everyday. I've been smoking it for years, no health problems here but I eat right, excercise and don't drink so... there's that going for me. By the way I also donate hundreds of dollars a year to local charities here so call me degenerate and tell me one more time how weed fucks up my and others lives. Please.
>>672093419
What if you worked at dominos and hid LSD under the Pepperoni's on someone's pizza. For like, a school lunch thing.
>>672093374
You'll probably have to deal with a lot of secondhand smoke if it were legalized. We all would.
>>672093106
and yet you are the one hating other people, while they have fun
sounds like a really fullfilling way to spend your time
also: i dont even smoke weed
>>672091569
your son has epilepsy and youre tired of his shit
>>672093717
you mean like with all that second hand cigarette smoke we all have to deal with every day
yeah..
>>672093745
>and yet you are the one hating other people, while they have fun
it is called resentiment, common to all statists
>>672093419
If I could actually afford pizza, I'd just buy more weed. I just can't stop smoking.
False. I'm in recovery, been sober for two years and I still think that shit should be legal.
>>672093596
Except everything the world has learned about criminalizing drugs. Production, demand and potency will all rise because of it being illegal, but by decriminalizing it, you save money on enforcing laws, pull in money from taxes and people who will treat their illness' with it who wouldn't buy it on the black market.
This information is not hidden from you in some weird conspiracy, you can literally google your way to everything from the scientific papers and the economic changes that has happened in the states were its been legalized.
>>672093596
I am aware. I can buy very good weed from my old grower for $100 an ounce. I can buy any strain or type, organic only or synthetic enhanced, soil or hyrdo, whatever really...from a dispensary for $300 an ounce. Yeah taxes, but once the market is flooded with dispensaries at the same concentrations as liquor stores, the price will drop.
>>672093717
Good thing the only reason i go outside is to go to work then. I don't know why people would smoke it in public though, they'd probably get it stolen or some pothead will come up begging them for it
>>672093691
Heat deactivates LSD.
Wouldn't work.
>>672093374
>aggressive
This guy clearly never smoked weed in his life
I love weed, but I must say, if you're happy without it, this is a good thing.
>>672094074
>if I could afford pizza, I'd just buy more weed
I can't argue with this.
Just made infused Rum and tried it.
>>672094189
I know a lot of people who wouldn't mind to share.
Well, I have even seen it happening.
Quite nice way to get into a conversation with strange people.
And since it is stoners, I wouldn't be too worried about getting mugged.
They are probably too slow to be a real danger.
>>672094050
so why would anyone want to be a statist?
the anarchist side looks much more comfy and fun
>>672094521
and?
>>672094689
I'll bet all anarchists are potheads.
how can you slow dry your weed in the best way and how long should you dry it? i need help
>>672094255
I literally fucking said i don't smoke weed how much more illiterate can you get. Thanks for reminding everyone
>>672094639
kek
whatever rocks your socks, anon
>>672094839
This one is, but I was before I smoked the first time.
>>672094868
Put it in an open cup for 8 to 24 hours in the dark
>>672094883
You are the illiterate. I did NOT oppose you.
I was saying your not smoking is obvious.
>>672095330
I achieved that without the use of drugs. TV and the media in general has hooked generations of people on legal and illegal drugs.
>>672080421
I am not a fan of this argument because the same thing can be said about heroin. Of course they are two very different things. But people fuck up there lives because of weed as well. It's a fair point but doesn't further any argument
>>672094868
http://www.growweedeasy.com/curing
i'll convince you otherwise
>>672094839
At least one is
>>672094706
It's pretty good. Slight buzz after a couple of minutes already.
>>672095784
But it is their choice to make, if they fuck up their lives. Let Darwin sort them out. I am not for young people smoking, though. Mainly, because it apparently influences brain development in a negative way. Another pro argument would be the fact, that having a drug culture provides certain safety net, because everyone is well informed and there are also rituals that help with proper usage. Drug users can't benefit from that kind of cultural safety net.
>>672095689
Congratulations. But how does that relate to the current trolling session?
I'd rather not have spics and niggers with more money than most governments, so I think all substances should be legalised.
Tax it, put warnings on it, but if people wanna get high, dont make em support cartels in doing so.
>>672096003
How much weed was it infused with? And what kind of rum?
>>672096345
Yeah but I would rather have spics and niggers in jail forever.
I used to smoke weed, i still do but i used to too
Calling everyone who smokes weed a "pothead" or "stoner" is like calling everyone who drinks an alcoholic. Fuck ur puny logic OP bitch lol
>>672096553
Mitch Hedberg, I wish you didn't have to have sex with women who've saved someone's life.
>>672096750
What else would you call them?
Let's get back to the main focus of this thread, which is the fact that only stoners support legalizing weed and none of you stoners can prove me wrong.
>>672095552
>>672095801
thanks :)
>>672097352
People. Maybe their names.
>>672097352
A .... cannoisseur XD
>>672076802
>Who gives a fuck? Everyone who who doesn't smoke weed is against it.
Not true. I dont smoke weed and Im all for it, even for recreational use. I may acutally try it once its legal or if i move to a state that its legal in.
>>672097578
It's funny because it's a play on "cannabis".
what way can you make the THC level get higher than CBD?
>>672093745
>also: i dont even smoke weed
I call bullshit on this.
>>672098087
Don't let the Weed get old. THC decays into various CBD derivates.
>>672098618
>You support weed and say you don't smoke it.
>I call bullshit because my premise is that people who don't smoke weed hate it.
And round and round it goes, where it stops everyone hates weed.
>>672075032
I don't smoke it, totally for legalization.
>>672078242
Oh look it's a straight edge fag... "stop liking what I don't like"
>>672075032
I support pot legalization because I hate Mexico. I have never tried it and never will.
>>672099612
I don't like law-breaking degeneracy. What's wrong with that?
>>672099758
What does Mexico have to do with anything?
how can you tell if your seed is a femail or nah? so i don't waste money and time for nothing
>>672101452
you grow it first
>>672101452
>femail
God damn it, that's hilarious. Maybe you need to get high on some literature.
>>672101593
btw, this is if you had more than 1 seed. You grow several at once, and they grow a bit, you can tell if they're female or male. You discard the male seeds and clone the females.
>>672086346
>hey guys, I'm saying all these words I heard, but because I have no idea what I'm talking about, I'll continue to ramble on and on about how they're wrong for whatever reason I can grasp at!
yawn
>>672099760
What about people that legitimately use it for Medical purposes? Are they law-breaking degenerates.
>>672102119
hahaha i just typed i didn't chek for miss spels
>>672102553
They are if they get high from their "medicine".
>>672087883
>look, another downside I created! good thing I have sources to back up my claims.
oh, wait...
>>672102926
Why though.
>>672099341
Sure you are.
>>672089614
>didn't finish typing
>t-the post b-button pressed itself, guise
>>672094116
>Dispensary
>$300 an ounce
Uhh what? An ounce at a dispensary is usually around 200
I'll bet those who say they don't smoke weed but are pro-legalization are lying. Nobody can be that stupid.
>>672104814
im not lying you fucking communist moron
