What's your excuse for being a poor faggot nigger and not having a 4k tv?
Because 21:9 is the way to go fucktard
I don't use the TV much
>>671889664
kek, not using a 4k tv as a monitor
what kind of faggots are on b?
I don't watch TV.
What's your reason for seeking the attention of poor faggot niggers? Seems desperate
>>671889664
well, i dont need an excuse. Have a 60" 4k in living room and use a 43" 4k as one of my computer monitors
>>671889664
i don't own a tv, it belongs to ppl that prefers somebody else to show them what to watch instead of choosing themselves
>>671889664
I have a life
>>671889664
and yet you don't post a pic of your 4k TV?
fucking faggot
I am not a normie.
>>671890115
my nigga
Waiting for next-gen video cards that can do 4k@120hz, otherwise it's a waste of money to just have a 4k tv and nothing to put on it.
What the fuck. Since when do they shoot anything other then planet earth in 4k? No point in 4k if most things don't even play in 4k.
>>671889664
Content delivery is still an issue. Pretty soon, they'll have the next Blu-ray type format that plays 4k. I'll hop on board then. They claimed 3D would be huge...yeah not so much
Who the fuck watches TV? And any of the current 4k TVs will be outdated since most of them don't even support HDR yet. You're tarded if you buy into 4k TVs right now, especially since there's little content. 4k monitors on the other hand aren't as tarded
>>671889664
I wouldnt know where to look. Also, it's uncomfortable to look at large small naked girls
>4k is a useless gimmick
>Huge and unwieldy
>Name already tarnished by pcfaggots
>Not about to waste my hard earned dough on something that will be cheaper in 10 years
>Already got a 50 inch
Tell me again where the advantage is you fad-loving nigger.
>>671889664
They do not make them in plasma?
>>671889664
I don't watch TV at all.
What the fuck is this then?
There is no fucking content.
ROG PG27AQ monitor if that counts.
>>671890468
look at a 40"+ monitor for a pc in 1080 vs 4 k and tell me there is no reason.
>>671890104
op avoid an entirely valid question to deflect how huge of a faggot he is.
1080p because im not ashamed of my dick size
when did you sell your hummer faggot and are you regretting it now that gas is down and there are no hummer dealerships around
>>671890468
timestamp or fuck off.
>>671890587
>>671890468
>>671890277
>>671890274
>pretending that 1080 in 4k isn't 4x better than 1080 in 1080.
>>671890006
I feel bad for your eyes
>>671889664
Proof of yours, faggot? :)
I rather have a projector with 120" screen than a 4K TV. Movies look perfectly sharp in 1080p as is.
>>671890848
Wow, just like a DVD up converted to 1080p is 4x better? Wow, you're a smart fella
8K will be a thing within the next two years. Ill be saving for that. Technology advances every year paving the way for something better all the time. Its why I dont make huge purchases on something like this, cause ittl be classified as absolite in a few years anyway. Ill stick with my 55 inch Samsung 1080.
>>671890683
>>671890683
forgot to add, the 43" is a Vizio i got for under $500 that has a great picture (better than my $1500 2 year old LG). Can you buy 4 good 23" monitors and the mount for under $500 to make a display the same size?
>>671889664
4k is barely enough resolution to drive VR, it will be obsolete by 2018
>>671891149
A fucking 4k 50" Sanyo is $500 you poor faggot
>>671889664
No excuse. I just bought a 60" 2 weeks ago. And it was worth every fucking penny.
>>671890984
From my experience 65inch 4k TV and going from 48 inch 1080p TV. It depends on the distance and screen size. 120inch 6 feet away would be shit but 10-20 feet away 1080p would be nice
>>671889664
Cuz I already have one
What's you excuse for not having a high end gaming PC and an Oculus Rift on pre-order?
i7 5820k
32gb DDR4 Ram
980ti SC
Asus Rampage V Extreme mobo
>>671891221
We'll all be slaves by 2018 so may as well live while we can.
>>671891596
I have some 2160p TV shows. But I would prefer higher frame rates and higher color.
>>671891682
Because my PC that cost total $820 can do exactly what your absurd shit with your tiny screen can do.
ITT
Moron arguing that
Size of TV = Life quality
The level of being morons are off the charts
>>671889664
I'm actually a rich faggot because I haven't blown a huge wad on a 4k TV when Xfinity doesn't broadcast in 4k, console games aren't in 4k, most videos on the internet aren't 4k and most shows/movies on netflix/amazon/hulu aren't in 4k. What the fuck is the point of buying one? There isn't any content to consume that would use all of those pixels.
It's like that guy that gets a yellow pickup truck specifically for commuting to work, and doesn't use it as a work vehicle whatsoever.
>>671891682
You can't bs the lights in your case mate. Tell me you aint lying. :')
I prefer my CRT, thank you very much.
>>671891118
And your a fart smeller!
>>671892005
I highly highly doubt your pc can come even close to matching the performance of mine. They're different leagues...
>>671891682
Enjoying your $1,400 4chan machine?
>>671891888
My 4k tv has a clearmotion 120 which makes 30 fps shit look 60 fps it's pretty nuts.
There's only garbage programs and stupid reality shows on 360p on cable, and (but not last) i don't have a stupid overrated next-gen console
>>671892089
There's no bs here. The red lights are from the Rampage V extreme mobo and my gtx 100i Cpu aio cooler and the white light is from my 980ti
>>671891682
I'm gonna wait till next nvidia graphic cards to comes out. The 980ti stuggles now play 4k games
>>671891682
>Look ma i can waste money on thousands of dollars of bullshit that becomes obsolete in 4 months
>Look ma
>look
>>671889664
>HD since around 2005
>2011-12 most people had HD TV
>even now there is not much HD content in TV (Europe)
Why would I buy newer technology although the old one is after 10 years still not fully established?
>>671892296
Way more than $1400.
if a computer cost 1000$ or 4000$ isnt really a discussion its pretty much the same fucking league
it doesnt make you rich if you blow 5000$ on a computer
being rich is something else
so just shut up! its embarrassing
>>671892174
I highly highly know that my pc can run battlefield 4 in 4k 60fps on my 50' Samsung 4k tv which really I mean what more could you ask for?
>>671890238
I'm not a fool chasing trends. I own two 65" Panasonic Plasma TV's. It doesn't get much better.
4K TV's are cheap LED TV's.
>>671892466
I have about $5,000 worth of hard drives does that make my computer good at games
>>671892826
Colors don't = frame rates or resolution, sorry pal.
>>671890238
>>671892826
Oled makes me get hard XD. The blacks are too good
>>671890848
Your lack of knowledge about how resolution works disturbs me.
Poorfag with a mammoth of a computer and 4k monitor.
>>671893119
Your semantics disturb me. Upscaling, bitch, it looks better.
>>671889664
Because minoritys have 4k tvs from welfare faggot
>>671892885
thats my point
as long as you have a graphics card its a computer 5000$ give or take is not an issue
its still commercial and not a server or a super computer
why even having a thread like this?
>>671889664
lack of funds, I do plan to get that new OLED LG tv in 2 years though.
>>671893228
You need to understand that things are produced to look good only in their native resolution. Playing Wip3out on a an emulator played on a 4k tv will never look as crisp and detailed as on a real playstation playing through a CRT. Bigger isn't better when it comes to resolution if what you're displaying is lowres in comparison you fuckwit.
>>671893737
1080 in 4k = better than 1080 in 1080, just a fact.
>>671890468
>waiting ten years to get anything
>>671889664
I don't even watch tv I mostly use my computer.
>2016
>TV
lmaoing @ your life
>>671893882
>I use a 640 by 480 wallpaper because it looks better in 1080.
>>671889664
what's the point of 4k without enough source material? and don't even come up with blu rays that come out one year after i already watched the movie or the shitty "original" stuff by amazon and netflix.
>>671894097
>>671894099
>Not using a 4k tv to watch shit on your pc.
>>671890006
are you fucking retarded?
>>671889664
>What's your excuse for being a poor faggot nigger and not having a 4k tv?
No 4K content?
r8 my tv /b/
>>671891149
In case you haven't noticed, technology NEVER matures. It is always pushed and never refined. As soon as something starts to be refined, they will add a gizmo or a resolution or a flashy-pully and get you to buy that.
Mature technology for the masses does not exist.
Mostly.
>>671894099
>television
>only used for television networks
>>671889664
because i dont watch tv and i dont want or need a monitor bigger than my coffee table.
>>671893167
you really must have some serious self esteem issues
and also problem understanding proportions
what you are displaying is not impressive at all
almost anyone could get that if they put some effort in
hell most people in this thread could probarbly buy that computer without breaking a sweat
but its about priorities
I don't use TVs for anything, and my laptop is only used for writing and music. Have not been a consumer of shows or movies in some time.
I don't own a TV
>>671894392
australia pls go
>>671894441
get what? what am I displaying?
I am a poorfag, proving that anyone can get a decent set up. I didn't even specify computer specs. I work in the 3d visualisation/games industry, I need a high end computer built for rendering to get the job done quickly. My priorities are in the right place.
>>671894704
Australia doesn't exist faggot
>>671890337
I got a 42 inch 4k in my games room for movies, only gets used maybe once a week.
>>671889664
The fuck is the point? nothing broadcasts in 4k
>>671892959
You're aware that slower frame rates, 24 fps in particular is better for cinema? The "Soap Opera Effect", you're educated?
>>671895506
Maybe for those 5 shows on Netflix that are offered in 4K. idk.
>>671889664
ive already invested all my money into something productive
>>671895650
Fleshlights?
dont watch TV
>>671895548
>24 fps in particular is better for cinema
Not really better, we're just used to it more.
Also shutter speed plays a significant role in the so called "Soap Opera Effect". It's not just FPS.
>>671889664
human eye cant even see 4k monitors
I bought a 55" Sony 4K but made sure it was HDR supported.
Any 4K tvs without HDR support will become obsolete really soon. Within the next 2 years.
And OLED is sweet for the first year. I sell Samsung OLED crap at my job all the time. They all get color wash out and screen burn within a year. I'm not even kidding.
>>671890277
I remember buying into the 3D hype a few years ago, only watched 2-3 movies. Anyone know if you can order new remotes for LG TV's?
>>671889664
I can't play gamecube on a 4k tv
>>671889664
Because it's too slow for gaming.
32 inch 480 results with component (not hdmi)
Is the best set up for console gaming.
>>671895931
my dreamcast won't work either
>>671895851
Want to reword that pal?
>>671895815
No, it is in fact better. Film has been slowed to 24 fps since black and white pictures existed. The pause in reel speed invokes a stronger psychological response; fear, anger, love, sadness, happiness, joy. All emotions are amplified at slower speeds.
4K resolution is a gimmick, just like 120 hz before it.
A plasma screen TV is and continues to be far superior. The best producers in the world choose not to shoot their movies in 3D, because they understand that 3D is a gimmick to sell tickets to children. Much the same, 4k is quantity of pixels over quality.
People use VR headsets with low resolutions over 4k monitors. Why? Immersion.
I have enough money to buy several 4K TV's. I'm not going to. Just like I don't buy brand new cars. I'm not a fool.
I'm not watchin tv
Because I'm not a retarded that buy every shit that they try to sell you.
Recently at the beginning there was the 3D, now the 4K tv's, then what?
>>671897111
>an alcohol
>>671896688
Let's be clear, anyone who actually finances a new car is a fucking Retard. You either lease a new car and buy out the lease, or you buy a car 1-3 years old with around 20,000 miles on it
>>671890006
You can't fucking see anything
>>671889664
Don't watch tv
Not wasting money on shit i don't need
Op is a faggot
>>671890006
> pixels less discernable
> insane input lag
> higher price coz 'tv'
Are you stupid?
>>671889664
Because with that money I would actually help somebody, so they can eat, you can call me a moralfag, better than a retard that spends a lot of money on shit that will get old next year, good luck sleeping at the streets for an Iphone 7 faggot.
>>671895548
>You're aware that slower frame rates, 24 fps in particular is better for cinema? The "Soap Opera Effect", you're educated?
Frame rate was picked for cost savings. Film was retarder expensive when if first came out. It was actually well known back in the day 90+ frames per second was ideal, given hardware limitations.
>>671896688
>120hz is a gimmick
LOL hahahaha, people who say this, either never seen 120hz content, or have a 120hz monitor or tv and haven't enabled the feature.
>A plasma screen TV is and continues to be far superior.
OLED is ahead of Plasma, and plasma screens generate a buzzing sound when displaying white. OLED also use a fraction of the power, making it easier for any one with a house powered by solar or wind.
>People use VR headsets with low resolutions over 4k monitors.
That actually had to do more with cost point and graphics card power. The developers were very open about this. They actually wanted to use something similar to the 5k format iMacs use.
>>671889664
i only download 720p releases. 4k is meh.
>>671897477
I said "buy", not finance. I would not buy a new car, implying I have the cash to walk into a dealership and pay the sticker price. I would pay cash for a car that has depreciated more than 70% of its value.
The word "finance" implies I would ever open negotiations to mortgage to the bank anything. I would not.
>>671896688
Eh, you're pretty stupid. For the sake of argument, let's just say that ALL movies are better at 24 fps (and it's not even 24, it's usually 23.976).
You've still got sports, and other media specifically designed for real life. Most people would rather watch their sports at a higher fps. There's a reason why 60i is common for sports broadcasts, and since you're pretending to be an intellectual, I'm just going to assume you know the technical reason.
How can 4k resolution be a gimmick? Again, for sports, the news, hell even porn, there's no question that people prefer a higher resolution at a higher fps.
Movies aren't everything. And a majority of people aren't watching movies. They're watching sports, the big bang theory, dancing with the stars, and other shows meant to mimic real life. Not everything produced is supposed to be a work of art, and you can watch a movie on these new TVs and disable the interpolation features and still get better color than TVs from 5 years ago, and obviously all the other smart tv features that come with it.
>>671898077
All of these points are definitively wrong.
Film has continued at 24 fps even with the advent of IMAX due to psychology, not limitations in technology or funding.
I owned a very expensive 120 hz TV with 240 motion rate. The effect was obvious, and so annoying that I sold the TV, particularly one night after watching the film Bladerunner on both it and the Plasma TV. Absolutely no comparison, the LED TV was cheap technology. The difference between driving a Chrysler and a Bentley.
Plasma was discontinued because it was expensive to manufacture. Buzzing is not an issue, and I'm not poor, so spending an extra 6 dollars a month to watch a plasma every day is fine with me. I don't live on batteries, I live in the first world. Just like I have clean drinking water.
You missed the point.
4K TV's are cheap TV's built with as many gimmicks available to sell the consumer. Anyone that knows anything about TV's knows that plasma is a better technology, an expensive technology, and a solid piece of electronic.
Just like everyone else here has said, there is no 4k content.
>>671898146
What the fuck are you talking about dude. You lost me really quickly there. Is English your first language?
>>671898146
I'm talking specifically about late model vehicles. Not vehicles that have already depreciated by 70%. No one buys a new vehicle with cash.
>>671898820
>Eh, you're pretty stupid.
Actually, I'm the most concise opinion in this thread.
I don't watch sports, other media designed for real life, or porn.
I do not prefer a higher resolution at a higher fps.
Movies are the only thing I watch on a TV, since I sold my PC a year ago. Who cares about the majority of people? The majority of people suck at life.
Dancing with the stars, the big bang theory, shows mimicking real life.... get a life.
You want to go dance, then go dance. You want to be a faggot because you watch TV shows about homosexuals, find a gay bar. You want to mimick real life? Don't.
If you want to watch movies, while fucking a broad on the catch, and doing real life things? Buy a plasma.
Kids these days.
>>671889664
What's your excuse faggot?
>>671889664
Because who the fuck watches TV anymore?
>>671900720
They do, and I could also. You don't think anyone in the world has 100K in spending money....?
I know you're probably 14 years old, but remember, there are many many many people with careers which supply $6000.00 plus a month.
>>671890468
because wielding TVs is an issue...
i always hate it when i cant walk around with my TV.
>>671900176
>>671898820 here
He's just trying to sound smart. Most people into movies are pseudointellectuals. They have no skills to do anything themselves, but somehow since they've watched a lot of stuff about film making, this gives them the right to talk down to others.
I've actually written a colorspace conversion algorithm, as well as a chroma subsampling algorithm, but that doesn't matter, right? He watches MOVIES.
There isn't much 4k content out yet, but it doesn't actually matter since there's pixel interpretation hardware that runs on the TVs that actually tends to make certain things look better (it can also be turned off if you don't like it). There's also a lot of porn currently being shot in 4k, and a lot of cameras (DSLRs), and even phone cameras have 4k. Also, there's a lot of youtube feeds in 4k.
>>671900734
I was explaining why most people would get a 4k TV... Why does the world need to revolve around you? And why not OLED?
Also, most people I know with exorbitant amounts of money, typically make the worst purchase choices I have ever seen. Why not get on your soapbox and complain to them?
>>671901477
The point is you can set it on your cheaply made IKEA entertainment stand and pretend like you're in the now because you have an expensive TV. When the truth is you probably don't own a pair of clothes worth more than $400.
>>671901477
Asperger's Syndrome is a wonderful thing everyone. Just lookie here.
>>671901166
No. You can't. And no. Most people don't have 100 grand in "spending money". You're a fucking idiot who still watches his washed out plasma and drives around in cars from 2004 because he thinks he's beating the system. By not buying new electronics and won't finance anything
>>671901963
Wow, your aspergers is pretty bad alright.
>>671901512
>Why not get on your soapbox and complain to them?
Because I'm on 4chan. Talking to you.
You've written an algorithm, good for you. But, 4k is still a gimmick.
>>671902217
Have fun pretending to be smart. I'm sure everyone thinks you're a jackass.
Hold on. Let me post a picture, too. Here's one from when I went to Japan. It makes me look cultured.
>>671902487
Hard to see, but its 4k AND 3D
>>671902004
Again, I'd agree to disagree that I'm not the village idiot. Cars from 2006, actually. I've never experienced washed out on my Panasonic's. That 120 hz TV had lots of light bleed though.
I buy lots of new electronics. I don't buy new gimmicks. And no, I don't finance things.
>>671902634
were not going to be able to see the 3d from a single perspective...
>>671902487
>>671902808
Of course not. I was just sexplaining that it is 3D capable
>>671902634
I can see the jumbled wires pretty well.
Nigga whatchu talkin bout I already stole one from my loaded neighbors
>>671903126
Yeah. Im too lazy to tear into the wall to hide them and seal it all back up
>>671889890
This
>>671903453
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Unique-Wire-Organizer-Flat-Screen-TV-4x30-Inches-Cable-Covers-Management-System-/141813162823?hash=item2104b92347:g:ah4AAOSw14xWL9wn
Heroine
I HAVE ONE!
U JELLY?
>>671890254
This image hurts my eyes for some reason.
>>671903802
Nice. Ive never seen broad ones before so i never considered it. Thanks, anon
>>671889664
Because I have 40 in/50 in t.v's in every room in both my houses except the bathrooms and 1 bedroom is why.
>>671892826
>>671893050
>TFW everyone stopped making plasma
At least its replacement (OLED) is starting to get down to the not insane level.
LG 9500 series OLED 4K TVs start at $2300 now (55"). Considering just a few years ago it was four times that price for a mere 1080p OLED TV that wasn't even as good, bretty gud price drop.
Because there are no 4k movies and consoles can't support 4k of course PC games need a 10k dollar PC to run at 30fps no thx
Its Amazing :)
>>671904743
Netflix and amazon prime have 4k tv shows and movies, jealousfag
>>671904278
>>671903922
>>671901745
Yeah, they make conduit in all shapes and sizes...
If you're going to spend a ton of money on that gimmick TV, at least spend 2 hours taking pride in mounting it.
This is what I was talking about...
>>671903922
Are you seriously sitting on the tile floor?! Jelly, no! Buy a desk!
>>671894166
You're an idiot, that is not what he is saying at all.
640 x 480 wallpaper would look better on a 1280 x 960 screen than it would on a 640 x 480 screen, however a 1280 x 960 wallpaper would look better on a 1280 x 960 screen than the 640 x 480 on 1280 x 960.
We have over a decade of proof of this. In fact, you are one of the contributors of this. You've been doing this for years. It's called a DVD.
DVDs look better on 1080p screens than 480p screens, and guess what? DVDs are 720x480.
>>671891682
>has super computer
>gets windows 10
lolololololololololololololololololololololololololol
Bragging about televisions? Is it 1960?
Please... every household has one. I have a 60" 4K, and use a 42" 4K as my monitor, and would never care to tell anybody, because they are fucking TVs.
>not having a $10K lens
I don't need one, my phone has YouTube music and porn. I'm happy with what I've got. Are you?
>>671905080
I am proud. As proud as you are jealous
>>671905364
W10 is excellent, fag. It's basically 7 again, but with DX12.
>>671905080
He cant, he spent all his money on that crap, I doubt he got something to eat either.
>>671889664
Nothing is streamed in 4K yet...
>>671905603
And big brother holding the key to your files.
Not that I don't think Win10 is the best operating system in existence (Win 7 was hard to beat), I don't like Microsoft's privacy agreement.
>>671905603
tell me when people make anything dx12
tell me when the gov. and microsoft delete all stolen content from your computer
fucking kiddos and their parents cash.
>>671904743
My $1400 PC runs 4k at over 30 fps min (I have a Radeon R9 Nano, retails at $500, got it for a bit less).
You could assemble/buy a PC with similar capabilities for considerably less. I splurged on some thing I didn't need to (really nice case, overkill CPU, overkill heatsink, overkill RAM). The only thing you should actually splurge on is the GPU.
>>671905733
Netflix and amazon prime have 4k movies and tv shows
>>671905420
what's the point of a 10K lens if the current max is 4k?
>>671897734
Tv's are cheaper because of their production scale faggot.
>>671905861
>using default setup
>>671905420
>dat lens tho
>you know exactly which one I'm talking about.
Im siting 2 meters away from the tv and i love it... no i dont want to mount it because alot better this way on that size... 70 zoll.
I spent 3000 Eur on it and i dont regret...
>>671905897
I have a computer, so am a child... stop smoking weed, Anon.
>>671892339
>My 4k tv has a clearmotion 120 which makes 30 fps shit look 60 fps it's pretty nuts
Yeah I got a 70" 1080p TV not long ago (waiting till there 4k content) with the 120/240Hz thing. It's pretty disturbing at first, movement seems too real like your watching a high quality soap opera or Broadway play. I was going to start turning it down like some people do but I've gotten used to it.
>>671906109
Sorry, I must be out of the loop on this. There's a way to defeat the back door?
And thats why i drink rockstar energy? faggot? and have 2500 Eur laptop? :D
>>671899754
> watching 24fps content on a 120hz screen
Whadya think was gonna happen?
>>671889664
>2016
>watching TV
>>671906346
>gaming system
70" sharp 4k android TV in the living room, 55" samsung 4k in the bedroom
>>671906512
if you're a man it's the best way to watch sports.
don't know how you watch your Kardashians programming.
>>671889664
>>671890006
Nothing outputs to 4k, no tv stations natuve to americas do either. Only a few movies are in 4k, playing 4k games on a tv is literally retarded. It hurts your eyes, is expensive and proformance wise It sucks and even 3 titans cant put a constanst 144hz 4k resolution for crysis.
You ar3 stupid and im guessinb was conned into buying a 4k tv. Im going to laugh when next year they release 6k oled for half the price of what you payed. Also I game on a 4k asus monitor. 122hz refresh. Tvs are horrible for gaming, also there are only a few youtube channels and less than 100 movies out that have scaling for 4k resolutions and up.
Yall fuckniggers just got told.
And thats why i drink rockstar energy? faggot? and have 2500 Eur laptop? :D
Im siting 2 meters away from the tv and i love it... no i dont want to mount it because alot better this way on that size... 70 zoll.
I spent 3000 Eur on it and i dont regret...
>>671889664
nothing has converted to 4k yet... so good going dumbass
I have 55" LG OLED 1080p TV (cost around 2000$).
I didn't get the 4K because you enjoy the high resolution only if you sit closer than 2 meters from the TV, which I don't.
4K is impressive at the store where everyone stick their face into the TV and admire the resolution, but many forget it is not a computer screen, it is a TV.
>>671902880
nice way of hiding your cables you got there!
pleb/10
>>671889664
>tv
>implying ppl watch tv in 2016
HAHAHA yuyuyuyuyuyuyuyuy kikike KEK
>>671906649
So, no?
>>671891682
>league
Underage b&
>>671906951
They can have my savegames if they want them.
>implying
>>671906750
The jealousy is strong with this one
>>671889664
because i am a poor faggot nigger
it's not hard to comprehend you mongoloid.
>>671905972
Not just that, but also chroma subsampling and shittier scalers.
There's really two things that differentiate a TV from a monitor (and these can vary):
1) a tuner
2) 4:4:4 chroma subsampling
100% of all PC monitors have 4:4:4 chroma, but very few "TVs" have it. It's kind of a big deal even at 4K. If you sit close to your monitor, which most people do, you'll notice even a 4K TV has kind of shitty text output compared to your "real" monitor when using any normal desktop OS: it's because the lack of 4:4:4 chroma. (Console game-makers know this and compensate, hence why a lot of console text is fat, generally ugly, fonts.)
In some cases this is a lot less of a big deal, depending on how the manufacturer design the TV, or if it's 4:2:0 or 4:2:2, etc.
Some high end TVs do have 4:4:4 of course, like all OLED TVs I know of, generally every brand's top end monitors (LG's 8500 and 9500 series for instance, and I think Samsung's 9500 series).
>>671906866
Didnt realize the made wide conduits. Getting some on ebay now cause i can AFFORD it, unlike you.
>>671907110
Thank you for making my case. You can't use your computer for anything else, securely.
>>671905420
>no timestamp
Fuck off.
>>671905420
Found the Creepfag!
>>671907513
>2016
>not having dedicated gaming PC
Please, faggot. Win 10 is awesome.
If you want to whine about security and rights being stripped away, go picket the NSA or White House.
>>671907762
Why would a creepfag have a 10mm?
>>671892296
>>671892463
Yeah, mine is $1400 and all my components are cheaper than his. 2/3rd the cores, half the RAM, GPU $150 cheaper.
Mine is ITX though, so I spent a bit more for the form factor, which means an equivalent mATX or ATX system would be slightly cheaper.
>>671891682
>windows 10
>razer
>shitty mousepad
>>671891682
>league
>csgo
>minecraft
>undertale
Nice, you really needed those specs to be able to play those games.
Also,
>actually ordering an oculus
jesus, at least get the vive you fucking retard.
Have fun with your useless VR gimmick hardware when literally nothing supports it in half a year.
>>671907858
for creeping.
>>671907961
I'm this fag:
>>671905603
Also getting Vive.
>>671889804
Wow that's a stupid comment
21:9 is literally shit tier aspect ratio
Ideal is 8:5 due to perfect golden ratio all other ratios are stupid
>>671908079
Like 3cm away from the subject?
>>671907780
Or just don't use windows 10....
Which is awesome. Except you have to surrender rights to anything on such an awesome operating system.
>>671905958
jesus christ
you're so fucking retarded
>>671907961
give the guy a break. He has a Pollos Hermanos shirt and a Katana hanging on the wall there so he might be a swell guy.
>>671890848
4k isn't what you think it is
>>671908126
Piss off faggot, no your not getting two fucking VR headsets
>>671908135
>Ideal is 8:5 due to perfect golden ratio all other ratios are stupid
That's not a perfect golden ratio. It's still rounded off.
Also even if it were, it wouldn't matter as there is no content that fits it well, so you would have black borders on just about everything from TV to movies to even many games.
>>671893228
>Semantics
>Literal facts
>Words
I know, right? What does anything really MEAN anyway...and how would we convey that...
Idiot.
>>671908186
Subjects are very cooperative for those closeups when they're unconscious.
>>671905420
>2010+6
>Shooting Nikon
>Not shooting Sony
Enjoy not ever enjoying the lust that is the A7SII
Because I worked for LG and Philips and I know that TVs are a useless commodity that we are just pushing on the market because they're visible on shelves and therefore are needed to promote electronic brands.
Nobody in their right minds would spend $5000 on a device which is technologically outdated within a year, and with no support after 2 years, with software written by monkeys in India breaking before the TVs are even fully out on the shop shelves and a service chain that rejects repairs when they don't know what is causing the long list of rebooting issues.
Good luck buying our crap, drone.
>>671889664
There are a lot more important components to a good image.
The human eye has limits. If you need 4K you are sitting to close
>>671908750
>implying I'd ever buy a LG or Philips tv
Because, unlike you, I am not a consumer whore.
>>671891682
Coz get sex.
My money goes in clothes, dinners, drink, events and cocaine.
Because my smartphone is already. And I don't watch TV because I use my PC and phone all day anyway.
>>671908135
>golden ratio
>ideal
Dank meme there kiddo
>>671889664
hey you dumb stupid nigger when they start producing shows with 4k quality then we will start talking
>>671908193
Broski... I have Win98, WinXP, Win7, Win8.1, and Win10 PCs.
All but Win7 are dedicated to games.
>>671891682
>not having a 6th gen i7
>not having 64gb of DDR4
>not having SLI 980 ti
fucking pleb kill yourself and throw your console-tier pc out the window
>>671908512
No, faggot... I'm not the retard you're arguing with.
I'm this guy:
>>671905603
and I'm getting a Vive.
>>671908891
Samsung's support office was right next to ours. If you think they're any different then you're an idiot. Hell. EVERYONE on the market uses the same electronic parts. LG, Sharp, Philips, Samsung - 90% of the LCD screens come from the same factory.
And when it comes to small electronic components? Nothing is made by the brand companies. NOTHING. They're all the same components of outside companies.
The only difference between brands is their marketing approach.
But I do have one. 65 inch.
>>671905897
>gov. and microsoft delete all stolen
you mean track everything you do say or post on the internet.
Ill just leave this here
>>671889664
There's no need to have a 4K tv yet
Congrats on being a sucker for wasting unnecessary money
>>671908800
the human eye can't see past 24fps and 900p
i have 4k
>>671908543
> implying there is any content for 21:9
It is the closest to golden ratio you can get on a monitor
Also most content is produced in 256:135 (4k DCI) then cropped to 16:9, they can do the same for 16:10
>>671909335
>>not having a 6th gen i7
Obviously a troll, and I'm not that guy, but X99 LGA2011v3 is a superior platform to Skylake. The 5820k far outclasses a 6700k and you have double the RAM bandwidth due to quad channel on X99 vs. dual channel on Z170.
The only advantages of Z170 I can think of is you have a native USB type C controller instead of having to put up with that shitty USB 3.1 ASMedia controller, and there are actual ITX options for Z170, whereas X99 has exactly one ITX board (and it's kind of dumb to get it, because ITX is so small it cannot support the extra PCIe lanes or quad channel RAM).
All these fags with their 65 inch TVs lmao nice dumping 2500 on a piece of shit tv when you could get a decent projector, 100" screen, and sound system for half that price.
>>671909637
900p in what screen size? The human eye can't see below a certain angular size, not a linear one or a number.
Also, you actually can tell the difference between 30 fps and 60 fps. Even though you don't see the separate frames, there IS visible difference.
>>671910066
>dubdubs speaks the truth
Really though, you're responding to a meme, Anon.
All these poorfags would buy a 4k tv if they had money like the rest of us. Damn. Cant you be happy for a nigga? Jealous as fuck...
>>671904642
I picked up one of those OLEDs for $1500 about a year and a half ago. I've yet to see a better tv. Very happy with my purchase, and it'll be a much cheaper upgrade to go 4k OLED in a few years.
>>671909820
>> implying there is any content for 21:9
Oh I guess 661 movies isn't enough 21:9 content for you:
http://www.imdb.com/list/ls073624685/
>>671910066
I'm being sarcastic to the nigger I replied to, replying on my portrait 21:9 29" LG while I have BF4 opened on my 144hz BenQ and it's pure sex.
>>671889664
It's 4k upscaled faggot.
>>671909989
troll here, thanks for not being fucking stupid and knowing your hardware. <3
>>671909820
>no content for 21:9
Let me just open any fucking game on my computer
You make me mad as hell anon.
>>671910172
>>671910357
I got baited when there was no bait. It's really time to go to sleep for me, I guess.
That or seppuku to salvate my honor.
>Samsung 65" curved; Fall 2014
>ASUS ROG 980m
Working my tower with my 980ti
Don't watch LOTR, bluray... it'll ruin your day.
>>671909575
>37" HDTV, 9' from couch
>implying I can't tell my 720p is shit
>>671910014
>All these fags with their 65 inch TVs lmao nice dumping 2500 on a piece of shit tv when you could get a decent projector, 100" screen, and sound system for half that price.
>decent projector at less than $1000
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Wow your standards are... not that high.
Although I do agree people don't look into projectors enough. It's pretty cool having a home theater with a projector instead of just a TV. Of course your environment is super important and I understand not everyone can have some perfect home theater/projector room.
They're super fun though.
The human eye cannot pick up all 4000 pixels. Why waste money on shit you physically cannot comprehend?
>>671889664
Because the martian is the only 4k blu ray available.... in limited quantity. And the 4k blu ray players (unless your using a computer) are $400.
cheapest 4k tv available $500
4k blu ray player $400
4k blu ray $29.99 - $39.99
ill wait.
>>671910865
Yeah I have the BenQ W1070, I know it's not top of the line but it's pretty fucking great for $700 my full setup was $1200 w/o cost of painting my theater room or chairs
>>671910928
Cause we're rich, dumbass. Go work hard for your measly pay, loser
>>671906750
>Thinking missing years of superior entertainment is worth the marginal reduction in price
Yeah, you're broke. Don't be jealous...though your anger is delightful.
>>671911108
lemme guess, your "sound system" is a 2.1 soundbar, right?
>>671911032
The Martian, Kingsmen, Fury Road, Sicario, Ender's Game, and some other shitty movies.
>>671906750
Have to use a display port
>>671889664
Not even used a tv since internet
>>671911431
Nope, Onkyo receiver with Yamaha speakers, 5.1
Amazon sales bruh, be patient, and fuck that insult hurt. I'd never recommend a sound bar.
>>671911444
I take it the martian isnt that good? I havent had a chance to rent it yet.
>>671910515
Ironically I went with a 6700k anyway. :)
But again, it was due to wanting an ITX system and epeen. Ironically a 5820k system would have been about only $50 more expensive than my 6700k system.
Getting a good cooler on a 5820k to fit into my tiny ass case though would have been... a challenge. Or I would have had to resort to water cooling.
I mean a Haswell CPU would have been just fine really, and for hundreds less. But my job pays me well and sometimes I like to have toys because I like to have toys.
I mean, did I really have to get a Samsung 950 Pro m.2? Fuck no. In what world would I need 300,000 IOPs and 1500 MB/s read/write? But I did. For reasons.
>>671889664
I dont have an excuse because I have that exact same tv
Because I work in entertainment with no overtime
>>671911880
Oh no it's excellent, I only listed the decent movies in that little list.
>>671890848
4K doesn't mean screen size.
It actually looks worse when you upscale shit.
>>671889664
>2016
>watching TV
>>671911902
I feel you fam, here I am stuck with my shit 6300 and 970 but you know what, it works for me for now. Will be upgrading soon and tossing this hardware in towards a living room gaming machine. Got friends who come over wanting to play Rocket League on that projector I mentioned up in the thread.
>>671911952
Ah ok, I really should upgrade though im running on an old sylvania 37" 720p made in '05.
>>671897477
Wish I could find that here.
1-3 years... 40kmiles average in my area. Everyone does alot of highway. It's also why leases make no sense to me with their limited mileage bs.
>>671905080
What tv takes you 2 hours to mount?
>>671889664
TV? why the fuck would I want a TV?
4k looks great! ... When you're sitting 5 feet away from it.
Resolution is like 1/10th of the overall picture quality IMO. I miss plasma screens. I'm excited for OLED to go down in price.
>>671912466
To be honest if you just want to make the jump to 1080p at least check out an Insignia tv. It's a Best Buy generic tv with frankenstine internals but the panels are usually pretty nice. Most of the ones I've opened up are Samsung and Sony panels. Although if you plan on going all out on a 4K tv go with a Sony 850C. Can't beat it man.
>>671889664
I don't see the point in buying one while my tv still works
>tfw 10k masterrice
>>671905420
>Nikon
lel
Pentax ftw
>>671913321
Fix your DPI scaling: >>671907192
>>671913857
filename gives it away
>>671914164
fuck you buddy
>>671909575
What a fucking stupid graph
What the fuck does "full benefit" mean? You can easily tell the difference between a 4k and a 1080 60inch from 20 feet away
>>671889664
thinks 4k is richfag shit. you can get one for $600 bucks man thats the standard price for a tv since forever.
>>671913857
Pentax is a joke, dear hipster faggot.
>>671915180
lol sure if you can find content to watch at 4k.
>>671915363
never heard anyone ever in the history of photography say that. what are you some kind of console faggot?
>>671910635
The same fucking thing can be done for 16:10 you dolt
>>671915527
No FF bodies, no FF lenses, shit autofocus, shit high ISO performance, shit dynamic range.
Pentax was great back in the 25mm days. Now it's a hipster meme.
Cameras accurately rated by quality:
http://www.dxomark.com/cameras#hideAdvancedOptions=false&viewMode=list&yDataType=rankDxo
>>671911032
Get a Netflix subscription and a fucking smart tv
>>671915841
*35mm
Fucking phones...
>>671915527
What is YouTube/Netflix
It's fucking everywhere
I spend on my dope fits
>>671915955
Enjoy your bitrate starved streaming.
>>671915841
you can still use the pentax lenses you dipshit I'm not going to argue about cameras with a /b/fag though.
>>671913857
>arguing with someone who is clearly a professional photographer
Check out the press pool, kiddo... see Pentax anywhere?
>>671915955
Don't forget the shit-scaled 1080p!
Whats the point when there arent even 4k videosources out thete ... Also you dont see much different between a fullHD and 4k when the screen is smaller then a fucking cinema
>>671916261
Why would you want to use Pentax lenses? Nikkor is far superior in quality and performance.
>you're not going to argue because you don't know anything
>>671915363
>>671915841
"Pentax is shit"
>Owns a Nikon Coolpix
I have a Nikon D3300 and even I know Pentax is better for more serious photographers
>>671916426
because I already own a fuckton of those lenses.
>>671916261
>Pentax lenses
Are we in the early 90s?
i have a 4k tv @ 4096x2160, which is the bigger version of 4k sometimes called "Cinematic" or something, and i only have it connected to my comp as a 3rd monitor.
No netflix or channels, but i move my movies over to it to watch.
its normally 1300, but i got on sale for 1000.. LG.
Its nice but most things arent in 4k yet.. Bluray and most netflix shit is 1080 tops.. so there arent even 4k versions of stuff released to the public.. Tried lookin for mad max or guardians of the galaxy but it just doesnt exist yet i guess
Yes, you see a huge diff tho.. ive watched a few things in 4k and even at my resolution you can toss a pic or vid up there and compare 4k to 1080 and holy shit 1080 looks like shit.. but thats cuz i got the size to see the detail.. 65" screen..
>>671889664
whats ur excuse of still watching tv
>>671889664
I would have enough to buy one if I didn't spend it all doing blow of your mom's ass. Also, student loans but mainly the blow thing
