kemono
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
kemono
>>710484004
Which other attributes?
>tfw have had nothing but one night stands
>>710484109
Replied.
>>710484194
I'll send something back soon
>>710484145
Except that's wrong, retard.
>>710484255
Doesn't need to be soon: there's no obligation, I just like helping people orgasm.
Fucking hell, I'm upset that there is a total lack of web comics that I am interested in. Gun Show ended, now all that is left is Back and Hark a Vagrant. Basic Income Please cancelled her comics Pictures for Sad Children and Michael Keaton, so now I have one comic that updates once a week and one comic that updates randomly. Woe is me, who only likes overly specific things and can't enjoy things that aren't that.
>>710484194
From what I have been told I apparently have a nice ass. Take that for what it is, I'm not sure if it's nice or not since I can't look at it.
>>710484332
well it was gonna happen soon anyway~
also my printers low on ink so it'll be on something else
>>710484363
I miss reading webcomics: before high school started, I read so many. What sort are you looking for? Maybe I'll remember a couple I used to read.
I heard Homestuck ended, which means I might read it some day in the future. I like things that end instead of going on forever.
>>710484383
Okidoki~
>something else
Huh.
should I just back away slowly?
>>710484553
ipad?
>>710484569
hey riley
>>710484363
Oh yeah, asses are nice: you can look at it if you use your camera's 10 second timer feature.
>>710484569
From?
>>710484598
jef.
>>710484620
this thread
>>710484598
>owning a tablet
Pleb.
But I'm still excited. Today I fapped to this:
https://e621.net/post/show/917676/2016-anthro-areola-armwear-belly-big_breasts-black
>>710484659
N'aww~
>>710484630
whatcha up to
>>710484553
Gunshow was really good, my favorites were from Basic Income Please. She caught the utter hilarity in the bleak despair of the human condition. Pictures for Sad Children and Michael Keaton were my favorites.
>>710484620
I haven't even taken a picture of my face. I also removed my bathroom mirror. I'm not gonna just look at parts of my body, that seems weird to me, to just look at parts of your body.
>>710484122
No.
>>710484695
if you insist. how are you?
>>710484720
not much, just finished adding more gay to my skyrim install, the usual. you?
>>710484695
well it's real old at this point
also, that aint gay
>>710484767
I got to re-add my gay stuff to skyrim. I'm not doing much, probably play some games in a bit
>>710484799
I don't think you can ever have enough mods for skyrim.
what are you going to play?
>>710484906
the witcher probably. first one
>>710484939
I never got around to that one, is it any good?
>>710484749
Pictures for Sad Children is the only one I recognise. I really liked it.
The only other comic I can remember right now about despair is this one called terrible terrible terrible.
Just read the tumblr from oldest posts to newest posts to get them all. Unfortunately the author posted some of the recent ones on vice instead.
It's about an opossum doing despair/alcoholism shit. I liked it.
>>710484767
I'm doing okay. Didn't expect to be up all night, but I am. I don't feel sleepy either. I've been browsing 4chan all night.
>>710484799
And~?
>>710484959
it's great so far, but I'm working my way through all the side missions before I continue with the main mission
>>710484993
boys are best~
>tfw no one to touch my butt
>>710484993
how are you even able to find interesting content for that long on this site? I can't remember the last time I've seen even 2 threads in a row that kept my interest
>>710485051
is it worth playing if I thought 2 was ok and didn't like 3?
also seconding boys are bestr
>>710485094
cute butt
>>710485094
I like your potato cam
>>710485152
I think so, the combat is very different between it and the others. they'res also a big emphasis on story
>>710485259
alright, is the story any good?
So, how many of you fags are actual zoophiles?
>>710484993
I''m not opposed to anthropomorphic work, my favorite comic of all time is Krazy Kat, I adore the work of Norwegian cartoonist Jason, and Maus was the graphic novel that really got me into the medium (though I read comics as a small boy, namely violent comics about monsters and going crazy), but a comic where that's part of it, the whole, it's anthropomorphic animals, is kind of a turn off. I may check it out though.
>>710485328
I think so, I'm nearing halfway in and I've been hooked by it
>>710485152
/b/ is the board I use least. Today I've used /g/, /n/, /k/, /vip/, /qa/, /soc/, and /jp/.
That's really the thing: once you use /b/ the least, you realise 4chan is a site for intellectual discussion.
>>710485371
I completely understand. If it helps you feel better, I think the author is NOT a furry.
>>710485393
I might have to give it a download then, I'm sure it's not worse than 3
![[001856].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/qvq39AD.jpg "[001856].jpg")
>>710485344
Do you mean zoophile as in zoosexual, or zoophile as in gets off to animals? Because I would consider myself zoosexual. I truly love animals.
>>710485524
What's the difference?
>>710485419
I only come to /b/ for these threads but most of the boards I actually like have been killed through some form of cancer
![[001873].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/vUfWFI2.jpg "[001873].jpg")
>>710485550
There's a massive difference which is why I asked. Zoophiles just like to fuck animals, but think of them as a zoosexual would. I use the term zoosexual because it's just that: a sexual orientation. It's far more than just a fetish, but a true and deep love for animals as you would see between two humans.
>>710485524
you're awesome. never let anyone tell you otherwise
>>710485524
Just stop
Get some help
>>710485445
I recommend trying it at least
![[001892].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/v5ofFHm.jpg "[001892].jpg")
>>710485667
Thanks, anon.
>>710485683
Already getting it, but not for being zoo.
>>710485419
I really like slice of life kinds of comics, like Fun Home, American Splendor, or Jimmy Corrigan, the really zany wacky stuff like Frank or anything by Robert Crumb, or the stuff that's kind of weird and/or deeply philosophical like A Contract with God, Action Philosophers, or Goliath.
>>710485617
Generals are killing 4chan, particularly many of the boards I like(d).
>>710485665
I see.
I think you're wrong here. The way I see it, there are bestialists and zoophiles.
Bestialists don't care about love or consent: zoophiles do.
That's why I consider myself a zoophile, since I love animals. I think they're beautiful and amazing.
Zoosexuality is a misnomer since only three sexualities exist: homosexuality, bisexuality, heterosexuality
>>710485665
Are you in a relationship with an animal?
>>710485665
*don't think of them
Sorry, I'm tired.
>>710485769
Some people call them different things, but that's just that way I see it. I like to differentiate them in some way at least. As long as it's understood it's fine.
>>710485776
To some degree, yes.
>>710485743
For what dare I ask?
>>710485769
>consent
How the hell does a dog tell you that it wants to fuck?
>>710485838
Severe depression, anxiety, and sleeping problems.
>>710485869
By trying to fuck your leg.
>>710485869
You have to be very delusional and anthropomophisize animals.
>>710485769
You forgot Asexuality. There is currently some psychological basis behind there being Zoosexuality, it's kind of a fringe thing though.
>>710485832
Yup!
Also, don't post so many dogs, I'd hate to have the thread deleted like it was a few days ago. I know where to find cute dogs online anyways.
But yeah, the way I see dogs: I see it not as a sexuality, in the way being attracted to black or asian people also isn't a sexuality:
dogs have nice bodies and personalities, it's a set of physical and emotional preferences.
Dogs are still men and women, just not human ones. Don't worry, I don't mentally anthropomorphise them.
>>710485985
"Asexual" people are just attention whores
>>710485985
Asexuality is not a sexuality, in the same way atheism is not a religion.
Asexuality is the condition of being undersexed, is all.
>>710484122
HAHAHAHAHHAAHAAHAHAHAH
>>710486051
Atheism is very much a religion. There are people out there that feel literally no sexual urges.
>>710486050
Possibly.
>>710486059
>>710485888
This. Or rubbing their pusspuss against you if you're into that.
>>710485995
I won't. Normally the mods don't give a fuck so long as it's not called and a zoo thread outright, but my shit is now all unsorted anyway.
Well, I actually remember reading a study dating back to the early 90's that called it a sexuality as well, and referred to it as I do. The main reason I differentiate the two is because -phile implies it as a fetish which is most definitely not the case for me. I care far less about sex with and animal than I do about love and caring. That form of true love is also why I call it a sexuality: because you can't be in love with a fetish. Animals are creatures, and not objects thus should be seen as such. The same goes for pedophilia. But yeah, all that matters is the implications being understood.
>>710485743
More pics like this pls
![[001984].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6Te56r8.jpg "[001984].jpg")
>>710486135
Yeah, hence the -a part. That prefix implies the lack thereof. Asexuality isn't a sexuality, and atheism isn't a religion.
>>710486377
Just one more. Don't feel like searching through 2k files.
>>710486135
>atheism is a religion
But that's not true. Atheism is not a religion. It doesn't have a bearing on whether someone is religious or not.
There are atheist religions, like theravada buddhism. Theravada buddhism is a religion with no god.
But most atheists we know are irreligious: they have no religion.
But atheism itself is not a religion.
>>710486310
-phile doesn't mean fetish. While I don't support pedophiles, the ones I've known online certainly weren't into kids as a fetish.
-phile means lover, and traditionally we see this in many words: francophile, japanophile, anglophile.
-phile means a lover of something, which means zoophile is a good, positive word.
>>710486459
True, but I just don't like the implications of it because of the way it is used.
Well, my computer suddenly flipped over and launched a bunch of shit across the room. So now I'm covered in tea and there's cigarette ash everywhere.
>>710486459
Atheism itself is a system of beliefs that people adhere to about the fundamental nature of the universe as well as what happens after death.
>>710486449
But that's literally incorrect. Asexuality means a total lack of any sexual urges, otherwise known as a sexuality characterized by a lack of sexual urges. Atheism is a lack of belief in Theism and all that other stuff, otherwise known as a belief in the absence of those things.
>>710486654
>long brown hair
>green eyes
>tfw me
Hot. Brown hair + green eyes is god tier.
>>710485344
Ayyyy
sure
>>710486703
Whatever buddy. The same can be said about zoophiles/zoosexuals than can be said about atheist and asexuals: as long as it's understood it doesn't matter.
>>710486725
I wanna see your butt now
>tfw brown hair and blue eyes
>>710486553
I've seen the word zoophile improve in its usage lately. I normally see people use zoophile for the good things, and bestiality when they mean the bad things.
http://panpipes.org/
I used to go here, but the people were very authoritarian, freedom-hating, and harsh. But you should try it anyways.
>>710486703
Not really.
>>710486815
This is all you get from me, me in my sister's panties. I need some of my own.
>>710486840
Yeah, I've noticed that. I do like it.
Never heard of it, but I'll check it out. Thanks.
>>710486879
Low quality pic, but looks like a 9/10 to me
>>710486805
But I just said two or three posts ago that there is some psychological basis for there actually being a sexuality called Zoosexuality.
>>710486840
Yes really. It takes as much faith and belief to be an Atheist as it does a Christian. Both rely on faith and belief in an utterly improvable hypothesis.
>>710486974
I really don't know why people like it so much. It ain't nothing special. Though I do think I have pretty nice legs.
>>710486983
Zoosexuality probably does not exist. I think there are either three or one sexualities, but not more.
>>710487016
Legs are good for things like thigh sex.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not by any means a Christian or Buddhist or anything like that, I'm simply making the point that on a purely logical and literal level it is a religion as much as the others since it is a system of beliefs about the fundamental nature of the universe as well as what happens after you die, just like 100% of all other religions.
>>710487180
I think there's an escape from religion, and that irreligion is a real, possible thing.
I think it's possible to not be bound by those nasty things that religions are.
>>710487173
That is true.
>>710487180
Religion means the belief in a God or deities. Atheism is the opposite. You're objectively incorrect.
>>710487309
>Religion means the belief in a God or deities.
You're wrong. I just posted above that there are atheist religions.
>>710487173
I'm not arguing that it does exist, I stated there is some psychological basis behind there being one. There are psychologists out there that do believe that there is such a thing as Zoosexuality after having patients that were zoophiles who not only had absolutely no interest at all in other humans, but who also very specifically are interested in animals.
>>710487277
The only logical thing for anyone to truly be if we are removing faith and belief from the equation is Agnostic. Agnosticism is the only possible way one could escape from religion because it supports nor denies the two hypotheses.
>>710487309
I'm objectively correct though. What about Animism? Which has no sort of God or Deity? Or Buddhism, which also has no God or Deity? Or Confucianism or Taoism? I can not be objectively incorrect when there are religions out there that literally say there is/are no Deities.
>>710484122
imagine how soft those legs must be
>>710487503
Then it isn't truly atheism.
>>710487542
Those are atheistic religions, yes, but are not truly atheistic due to it still being a religion. I guess I could say that I'm kinda wrong for once, but that's just what I believe. See >>710486553
>>710487638
Atheism is also a religion since it relies on faith and belief as much as Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc.
>>710487718
Like?
>>710487542
As for people only interested in animals, they are simply homosexual, bisexual, or heterosexual, and prefer the bodies and minds of animals.
I've known people like this.
>two hypotheses
There are many more than two.
>>710487638
It's not irreligion. But atheism simply means no belief in gods.
Some religions have no gods.
Atheism/theism is a very, very simple binary about whether one believes in or doesn't believe in gods. It doesn't imply whether a person is religious or irreligious.
Atheism and theism only make one single point.
>>710487718
Atheism does not imply religion or irreligion. Atheism itself is not a religion.
Or else irreligion cannot exist: as all irreligion is atheist.
>>710487838
Eh, fair enough. I'll just have to agree to disagree on this one.
>>710487575
thicc thighs
>>710484122
KYS
>>710488125
regg'd :vC
>>710487732
Like they had a firm belief in what happens after you die. You die and then there is nothing. That is an improvable hypothesis which Atheists have faith in and believe is correct. I mean, I don't understand how you aren't able to wrap your head around this.
>>710487838
Atheism exactly implies religions because, AGAIN, it relies on faith and belief in an improvable hypothesis about the fundamental nature of the universe as well as what happens after death. Not all irreligion is Atheistic. Agnosticism is a lack of religion, secular humanism is a lack of religion, Spiritual but not religious is a lack of religion. But even then, I would make the argument than any system of belief is a religion in itself. Agnosticism is removed because it is a lack of a system, since they buy into nothing since they cannot either prove nor disprove either hypothesis.
>>710489720
The way I see it, an animal body is a body type. A person is still attracted to men and/or women, but maybe solely of an animal's body type.
>>710489981
But that is incorrect.
>>710490024
But it's not. A male dog is still male. A female dog is still female. Being a dog doesn't make any new sexuality, as much as being skinny/fat/muscular/nerdy/jock doesn't make a new sexuality.
Sexualities are solely based on two genders.
>>710489834
No, he's interested only in X and not interested in Y, and then you get into the subcategory of body type, just like Zoosexuality. And again, remember, I'm not arguing that Zoosexuality is a thing, just that there is some psychological basis for it.
>>710489981
The way that psychologists and everyone else sees it is animals are different from humans and it isn't a body type since it's much much more than just, fat, skinny, height, etc.
>>710490152
You're right. They're fluffy too <3
>>710490146
>Sexualities are solely based on two genders.
But that is completely wrong. Sexuality is based on attraction.
>>710490214
Attraction to those two genders.
>>710490256
Okay, then what about traps?
>>710490214
Attraction is based off reproduction, which requires two genders
>>710490317
So gay isn't a sexuality then? Right, got it.
>implying there are only two genders
I'm not going to say there are the literally thousands of genders that tumblr is trying to put forward, the whole omni, demi, alpha, beta, gamma, cappa, cis, whatever else shit. But there are more than two genders.
>>710490278
Crossdressing males? That's still attraction to males, just feminine ones. I suppose that can get close to being a fetish, if a person treats it as one.
>>710490317
lmao
>>710490463
What if you're straight and like traps? You know, like 90% of people who like traps. That would make them...? Bisexual?
>>710485912
not really. it's pretty normal for pet owners to anthropomorphize their pets. doesn't take mental illness. just because biologists don't do it doesn't mean it's bad for society in any way
you're blowing it significantly out of proportion as a moral argument against zoophiles. let's not beat around the bush here
>>710490563
Yes, they'd be bisexual, and in denial about their bisexuality.
You can't like the same gender and be heterosexual, by definition.
>>710490685
So what makes bisexuality a thing? Your argument suggests that only heterosexuality and homosexuality exist. Why is bisexuality a special case.
Also this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoophilia#Zoosexuality
>>710490496
Gender and Sex are not the same thing. And then what about XXY and XYY. And what about intersex people who have both a penis and vagina or the primary sexual characteristics of one sex and secondary characteristics of another? Or what about males who are born as females because their bodies failed to develop a penis while in the womb, yet still have an XY chromosome?
>>710490785
For once I agree with you. Whether someone wants to think of an attraction towards animals as a fetish or not doesn't change the fact that it could be considered a sexuality in some regard.
>>710490763
Bisexuality means being attracted to all two genders.
My argument actually suggests that heterosexuality and homosexuality may be edge cases related to bisexuality.
Thus, why I always say there is either 3 sexualities or 1 sexuality, but not more. I think three sexualities is most likely.
Okay, I read that.
>>710490785
Those are anomalies. Yes, they exist, but that is what they are.
>>710490981
>heterosexuality and homosexuality may be edge cases related to bisexuality.
... What? The fuck?
>>710491093
Bisexuality is a broad 2D spectrum, and homosexuality and heterosexuality are two single points on each end of the spectrum. All other points are bisexual.
>>710491177
>>710491214
For example, the kinsey scale has seven categories. One category is straight, one is gay, five categories are bisexual.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heterosexual%E2%80%93homosexual_continuum
There are two sexualities
Heterosexual, and faggot.
Then there's the Samoan third gender that has been a vital part of their culture for centuries.
>>710490962
You're not agreeing with me about Zoosexuality because I am not making an argument for or against it, I'm merely putting forward the reasoning behind some psychologists backing Zoosexuality as a sexuality.
>>710490981
But you still have to consider them when you're talking about gender being directly linked to sex.
>>710491265
I see it as being 0-1 being straight, 2-4 being bisexual, and 5-6 being gay. Having a guy suck your dick doesn't make you gay if you aren't attracted to him. You're just looking for someone to suck your dick.
>>710491338
Yes, I'm aware.
>>710491321
You do realize that is in my favor of zoosexuality, right?
>>710491338
True. I suppose you could see them as their own genders, or as malformed versions of the other two genders.
I take the latter view.
>>710491366
>1 being straight
>5 being gay
But that's wrong. They're bisexuals with very strong preferences for one gender.
>>710491514
Whatever, dude.
>>710491500
It's against it: can you tell me which number is zoosexuality on the kinsey scale?
You can't, because sexuality is a line. When I said 2D earlier I made a mistake, I meant 1D.
Sexuality is a line between heterosexuality and homosexuality. It is not a 2D plane. It is not a 3D space.
I mean, I'm honestly not trying to be a dick here, but I think most, if not all, of you have misunderstood what gender, sex, and sexuality are.
>>710491514
Again, gender and sex are not the same thing. A man with an XY chromosome can still identify their gender as a woman and so on.
>>710491600
>sexuality is a line
Exactly! So why the fuck is it so hard to understand that there may be different lines differentiating between animacy? I see attraction towards humans and animals being on the same scale as the Kinsey scale. The same can be said for age.
>>710491681
So you mean they can lie about their gender? In reality, a MtF tranny is male, and a FtM tranny is female.\
>>710491726
What you just said turns sexuality into a multidimensional space.
I said sexuality is a line.
>>710491600
Alfred Kinsey's work has largely been discredited in the psychological community and is only taught in class because he is the founder of the branch of psychology that studies specifically human sexuality. Just as Freud and Jung are both taught, and yet Freud and Jung have both been dismissed.
There are only two genders
>>710491770
Hmm.
>>710491792
Details please? I'm genuinely interested. I don't particularly care for Kinsey himself, but I think the scale is a useful tool.
I agree that myers-briggs, freud, etc are /x/ material.
>>710491770
Gender and Sex are not the same thing.
>>710491812
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fa%27afafine
This is an actual recognized and practiced third gender.
>>710491901
>Traditionally, if a family had more boys than girls or not enough girls to help with women's duties about the house, male children would be chosen to be raised as fa'afafine. [2]
>male children would be chosen to be raised
>male children
>male
Wow, they're male!
>>710491859
Oh? And what is this right here?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-reproductive_sexual_behavior_in_animals#Inter-species_sex
>>710492107
It's not a sexuality. I didn't say zoophilia doesn't exist, as I am a zoophile and I love dogs in every way possible. But it's not a sexuality. I am bisexual.
I know zoophilia exists. I know interspecies sex exists.
But that doesn't make it a sexuality.
>>710492236
So what about someone who is attracted to only female humans, but only male animals?
>>710492275
Bisexual.
>>710492319
>>710492342
Can you tell me the right answer? heteroanthrosexual homozoosexual?
>>710491888
So, essentially it's that Kinsey saw everything on a sliding scale, from 0-7 if I'm remembering correctly. What it is believed now is more like a huge graph with an X and Y axis that someone can fall anywhere on. Currently I believe that the standard model is the SASO, which measures on a continuum, accounts for changes over time, looks at various dimensions of sexuality, and also measures heterosexuality and homosexuality separately.
>>710492038
Wow, biologically. Again, SEX AND GENDER ARE NOT THE SAME THING.
>>710492386
It sounds retarded, but that's a very direct explanation of it.
Please do not equate the arguments I am putting forward with Dash's arguments.
Anyways, I am going to lie here for several hours and drift in and out of nightmares.
>>710492422
Interesting, I see. Having a separate axis for attraction to men and women makes asexuality and the far end of bisexuality opposites on a 2D plane.
Reminds me of a political 2D plane I use.
Alas, I don't think measuring how asexual/sexual a person is is relevant when judging a person's sexuality.
>>710492474
What about an asian person into black guys and white girls?
>>710492724
Sleep well James, ya crazy bastard.
>>710492733
Homonigger and heterocracker. It's not wrong, but it just sounds retarded. Also, these are literally different animals entirely, not just subspecies of homo sapiens.
>>710492724
oyasuminasal
>>710492889
It sounds amusing.
Well, I like human men, human women, dogs, and bitches
<3
![[000351].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/JjJYvUI.jpg "[000351].jpg")
>>710492961
Good taste, my friend. What about hoers?
>>710493072
I'm not romantically interested in horses, but I'd like to jack off a stallion some day.
I don't think I would have a long term relationship with any horses.
![[000365].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/dWYEU5C.jpg "[000365].jpg")
>>710493203
Interesting. I'm very interested in mares, but not stallions. As for dogs, I prefer bitches but males are nice too.
>>710493388
Ideally, I'll some day live with some dogs and bitches, and be in real relationships with them.
Fun fact! Did you know the male word for dog is dog? English actually is a language with genders, like many other European languages.
>went from inane genders argument to "MAN I WANNA FUCK ANIMALS"
stay classy
>>710493612
That makes two of us.
Yeah, I just don't use it because, as you can tell, I'm a hipster faggot who likes to differentiate to an extreme extent. I don't like ambiguity in terms of definitions.
>>710493761
Because we still are zoophiles/zoosexuals/whatever retarded bullshit, but we're simply arguing about the differentiation in terms.
>>710493766
I think language is beautiful, you can do so much with it to be vague or precise. Hopefully I'll get my PhD in some sort of linguistics or computer science some day.
>>710493926
Neato. Personally, I'm a very precise person, so I like shit like that. And coincidentally, the guy I love wants to do the same with linguistics and comp sci. But I digress.
>>710494061
i'm fine with group relatoinships you want me and him and dogs?? ;))))
Just kidding, but actually not kidding:
Since I don't trust myself to be able to walk dogs at least two hours a day on my own, I will NOT own dogs until I am in a relationship with one or more people first. Dogs should be walked two hours a day and I know I cannot make myself do that every day.
I sometimes barely can handle the fact that I walk my family's dogs one hour every day (someone else walks them the other one hour)
What's he like?
Christ. I just spent 2.5 hours arguing about zoophilia and its definition. I sometimes forgot how much I enjoy arguing about simple bullshit.
>>710494288
I don't into polyamory. I consider animals as my equals, and I would never share a human with someone thus I would never share an animal.
Seems like you really care for them. Good, that makes me glad to see another zoophile.
Oh god, he's just perfect. I could go on for hours about him. I've never met someone I connected with so well, and so quickly. Now that I know he's gay, I really want to be with him.
>>710494522
I see, I see. I know dogs don't have the same Christian mindset most humans have, so they don't know about things like cheating or not cheating, but I hold myself to a few standards anyways.
I want to be in a closed group relationship, not an open one. So I'm not... "sharing" the dogs :s
I mean, the dogs would be an integral part of the group relationship, along with the humans. But you know what i mean by share, when people post online "i'm sharing my dogs ;)" yuck
Since you wouldn't share, doesn't that mean you have to pick between him and dogs?
The reality is I don't treat dogs as equal to humans, since they simply aren't humans, but neither do I want to dominate them! I want to coexist.
>I consider animals as my equals
have you ever met an animal
>>710494830
Oh, I see. I suppose it would be a bit different in that case.
If he is a zoophile, then yes, I would share with him, but no one else.
That's a good way to think. I like that.
>>710494953
Yes?
>>710494953
You're arguing with a dude who thinks children are intelligent and educated enough to make informed decisions about having sexual intercourse.
>>710495068
surely you must've noticed they're not super bright
>>710495121
Yep.
>>710495124
I have, but I still treat them as I would a human.
>>710495124
As much as I think Dash is a fucking faggot, I have been to Walmart and "not super bright" can definitely be applied to a chunk of the human race.
>>710495121
this is the end point of equality doctrine
>>710495178
that is patently absurd
if you put the same input into two different machines, you will achieve different outputs
humans and animals are different machines and should not receive the same input
>>710495253
sure and I don't treat idiots the same way I treat sages
>>710495320
I know, but that doesn't change my love for animals. I really only see that about the more intelligent and domesticated ones however, like dogs and horses.
>>710495320
Yeah but do you treat retards like you would a dog?
Cause idk about you but I am more forgiving to dogs.
>>710495392
right got that just loving doesn't equate to treating them the same, dogs have to be treated like dogs
>>710495525
no, I avoid retards like the bubonic plague and mostly wish they were just gassed
>>710495613
And I do treat them like dogs, but I also treat them with love as I would a human.
>I consider animals as my equals
>"You guys are still rotting in here~?"
>"Would have thought that you would have moved on by now honnestly, done something more fruitful with your lifes and left these mentally unstable dog degenerates to wallow in their own insanity"
>>710495068
I see. That makes sense!
Basically I agreed with subjectivefag a little in that animals aren't human and to treat them as human isn't quite right. You can respect them and treat them well: as dogs! To playfight with a dog playfighting with you is to already not treat it as human by playing with it like another dog would.
Treat them like dogs you love and respect, is what I mean to say.
>>710495679
I've nothing else to do between 10pm and 6am if I am not working.
>>710495613
Exactly
>>710495679
>you guys
>he comes back every time he gets his ass off his goddamn boat
don't forget, you're here forever
>>710495661
gotcha that is clarifying
>>710495767
I feel the same way about retarded dogs, to be fair
>>710495750
Precisely. That is exactly what I mean when I say I treat them as equals.
>>710495679
>>``~''
YES
>>710495795
What, like pugs?
>>710495767
>"That's not exactly true now, is it? You could quite literally be doing any number of more constructive things with your time, you could even work a night job if you so desired"
>>710495795
>"I haven't been on a boat for four months matey, won't have the certification to until December 7th"
>>710495915
Pugs are merely retarded looking.
>>710495922
why'd you get landlocked? Suck too much dick and inadvertently convince your crewmates you're a wench?
>>710495922
I DO work a night job. That is why I am awake at these god-awful hours.
>>710495985
They're inbred enough that they are probably fairly retarded as well.
>>710495985
>" Company was going through a rough patch. Last in, first out. Just so happened they didn't give me my marching orders until after my certification expired"
>>710496073
>"Have you considered working a second job to fill in the gaps, something menial and flexible?"
>>710496127
What exact job are you getting, swordy?
>>710496073
Every pug I've ever interacted with has been pleasant. I've got more beef with the incessant pitbulls populating philadelphia that idiot hipsters feel obligated to adopt because "muh underprivileged doggos"
literally the niggers of dogs
>>710496127
Being laid off is a very boring explanation so in my head I'm just gonna go with sluttery.
>>710496127
Not particularly. There isn't a lot going for this time of night, especially work that would be happy bending over backwards to fit in with my endlessly changing Casino roster.
>>710496191
>Every pug I've ever interacted with has been pleasant
That has nothing to do with them being or not being retarded.
>I've got more beef with the incessant pitbulls
Yeah I hate his music too.
>>710496165
>"I'll likely go for a deckhand position again, though idealy I want to make use of my AEC ticket so I can start accumilating time for the next level of certification. That said, when QT finishes uni towards Summer I would really like to do some sea fishing again"
>>710496191
>"On the bright side, my Ark game is fire now!
>>710496191
You see this cutie? She's part pit bull.
>>710496391
I see. Googling those acronyms didn't get me anything, though.
>>710496353
well I mean they were non-stupid to the extent that they could obey commands and shit, that's pretty much the delineation for doggos
>>710496395
great, and one of my best friends is a nigger, but as a general rule I don't trust the damn things
>>710496391
Ark in the noah sense or is this something else
>>710496495
Can't basically all doggos obey commands if taught?
Honestly all you're doing is convincing me that retarded dogs are smarter than retarded humans
>>710496353
>"No possibility of getting extra shifts at your current job then?"
>"How about distance learning; upskilling to a blue collar trade like welding or plumbing?"
>>710496492
>"The AEC is a basic level engineering certificate. It basically means that I have a base understanding of deisel engines and can, in theory, fix them!
>"The next level of certification, the AEC2, covers all other boat systems, such as plumbing, sewage, refridgeration, air conditioning, electrical systems, the works"
>>710496495
>"Ark is a survival sim with dinosaurs and AR15s"
>>710496655
Probably, but some retarded doggos are real fucking violent (pit bulls). Again, like niggers. I probably prefer retarded doggos to retarded people regardless.
>>710496681
>dinosaurs and ARs
how'd you know about my fetishes
>>710496756
>"Would you like to join my clan on Steam? It's a PvE server full of Dutch ladyboys"
>"The base game costs £22.99"
>>710496655
Disobedience in humans is a trait of intelligence though. Only slaves and wageslaves do as they're told.
>>710496681
Ahh, neat. I turn twenty this month, and I don't have a licence or permit to drive a car.
I will, however, in December or January, get a certificate in system administration.
Good luck! Is the internet shit on the boat? How many books do you bring with you on the boat? How much reading time do you get?
>>710496848
maybe later, I haven't had an internet connection that appreciates online games for a little while and I've got melee to play
I'll keep that in mind though
>>710496681
Because frankly, I don't really need the money. My capital is around half a million and I don't pay interest on my mortgage. The only reason I ever lack cash is because I insist on keeping mortgage payments consistent despite there being no need.
I'm actually learning Accounting, but that's during the day.
>>710496906
>Disobedience in humans is a trait of intelligence though
If you're literally eating your own shit after being told not to eat your own shit, that is not intelligent
Selective disobedience sure. But disobedience in general no.
>>710496906
>"Internet reliability depends on where we are. It can be decent in many ports"
>"I don't bother bringing books with me since I have to carry all my gear to international destinations, even other boats if there's a transfer mid-rotation"
>"Days are typically 12 hours long but you're essentially on call throughout the whole month"
>>710496943
>"Wanna add me on Steam regardless m80?"
>>710496681
>Sword can in theory do diesel repair
Well blow me down.
yeah disobedience is not correlated to intelligence at all in humans
if it were somehow I think prison wouldn't have an average IQ of 80
>>710497120
don't see why not
id/subjectivef
>>710495750
>11/0/9
wat...
>>710497058
>"Fair enough then."
>"How about a productive hobby, like bodybuilding or a combat sport like boxing or fencing?"
>>710497150
>"Had the same reaction with many of my work colleagues on the job. They expect some dress wearing sissy when they hear you're a homo, not a 6ft tall man with a muscular/chubby build"
>>710497175
>"I'm humberseawolf "
>>710497175
>"What's your icon, there are two in the list, both furries"
>>710497405
got it, neat
>>710497480
cat with a MAGA hat, but if you go straight to the url it should be easier
http://steamcommunity.com/id/subjectivef
class is over goodbye lads
>>710497405
Well, that's out of the question at the moment cause I've kinda got a spinal injury right now. At the moment my physical capabilities involve shuffling about at old-people speed and wanking.
I do paint sometimes and I USUALLY keep fit, I do plenty of cardio and weights. But that doesn't cover the full 10pm-6am or so where the world is sleeping and I got shit all to do.
>>710497405
>your colleagues have never heard of a bear
I mean that's bullshit but I believe it- Balking at your learning how to spin a wrench despite being a queero would be hypocritical since that's kinda my bread and butter. I more balk at a young people being able to learn it since I was of the mind until now that wrench spinning was a dead art. Pleasantly surprised!
>>710497526
>"Added~"
>>710497636
>"Oh well"
>>710497813
>"Sockets and ratchets are going to be in high demand over the next 20+ years. I would be silly not to take advantage of the coming wage inflation due to low numbers of skilled workers"
>>710497971
I should just take a little time in the coming years and get most of the ASE certs and a few welding certs too, just so employers stop looking at me like I'm some kind of grade A bullshitter when I put down extensive experience in auto diagnostic and repair + oxy/acetylene, MIG and TIG welding + general knowledge on a manual mill and lathe. But that costs money.
>>710497120
What do you do, then? If you're not reading, there must be nothing to do but daydream, think, and sleep.
>>710498317
>"Money you'ss quickly make back hand over fist. It's well worth the initial investment if you can manage it"
>"Still single?"
>>710498411
>"I tend to cook when I'm not working"
>>710498570
If I wanted to hitch my cart to a welder/machinist/mechanic gig immediately- But I'm dead set on engineering proper for the time being since I'm a glutton for punishment like that.
