FEMINISTS ARE TRYING TO OUTLAW SEXBOT DEVELOPMENT
Feminists don't want men to turn to sex robots because it drives down demand for their real pussies.
They want to drive the "cost" of pussy up, making it valuable again.
Simple economics.
The supply curve was damped in olden days, because women were good and chaste.
So men had to marry the pussy to get the pussy. The "price" was marriage.
Now, imagine how little valued pussy will be when millions of realistic sexbots flood the western market?
Will there be a shitstorm over this? Because once women are irrelevant, feminism is reduced to being a joke
Shithead professor in England wants men to stay enslaved to the vagina:
>Maybe it’s time to take misogynistic sexual dysfunction more seriously. Maybe people who want to buy sex robots need to present the agreement of a couple of doctors, before they are judged emotionally restricted enough to need to retreat to such an inhuman fantasy. Or maybe, out of respect for women, this technology should just be rejected.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jun/10/feminism-sex-robots-women-technology-objectify?CMP=fb_gu
If someone buys an unauthorized sexbot clone of a real woman, has that woman become a victim of sexual assault?
I guarantee you that the laws will protect women.
Just watch, it will start with unlicensed celebrity realdoll lawsuit
What about when your sex bot files rape?
>>705801347
If they can they will anon.
Feminists take every right they can, including most of the Bill of Rights.
This article is impossible to read I couldn't even finish it
Who wouldn't want a beautiful sex robot who happens to be cheerily multi-functional?
Frankly if scientists can get a good realistic sex robot to be the price of a car or thereabouts, then men will suddenly ignore biological pussy.
She cooks.
She cleans the toilets.
She recharges in a closet for a couple of hours while you are at work (battery tech is getting more and more amazing).
She will wash your car in your front yard, to the envy of all neighbor men.
And, really, imagine fucking a sexbot much like pic related every night.
All she wants to do is please you and then give you a relaxing massage (and only about half of the women I have ever dated could give a decent massage, or wanted to -- though they loved to get one).
Or a good hot bath where shewashes your back and then hits all the fun spots with a glee indistinguishable from any other girlfriend you ever had. And better than most.
She can come programmed with audiobooks, too, for when you want to lay there in post-coital darkness and bliss and read a book.
AND SHE NEVER GETS TIRED!
They have talking dildos and shit, how is that not classified as a sexbot?
Women have been replacing men with silicone for decades, they need to shut the fuck up, seriously.
>>705801579
It is rage-worthy.
How glibly the feminists talk about taking away a man's rights.
Sure is neckbeard virgins in here.
>>705801047
reply by banning vibrators please
>>705801709
>They have talking dildos and shit
Shit.
I am not surprised that they have those, but did not know they exist until your post.
Women are masters of the double standard.
>>705801875
A-a-a-a-and the vagina tries to shame men.
>>705801889
You just know that the second a tall, hunky, dark-skinned male sexbot with a foot-long dick becomes available, women who can afford it will be all over it.
But no, men aren't allowed to have female sexbots, of any kind, because it's misogynistic and demeaning to women.
Now im not agaisnt the sex bot, i think that we can benifit from it. It would make a great bedroom toy for you and the gf, but what about when your gf buys the black male version and you are getting chucked everyday. What im saying is what if women use this technology to replace men for sex bots that are actuall able to give them orgasums.
Also, it could indulge your fantasies.
Say you were interested in mom-incest fetish.
So you send the factory a couple of pictures of your Mom (fully clothed, of course - the factory will have to do some extrapolation).
Maybe give them a copy of a few of her voicemails.
2 months later you are in your own taboo fantasy world.
>hide the bot from your bio-Mother though when she comes over
>>705802417
>send photos to the factory
>not just use your 3D printer to print some new parts
Come on, man.
>>705802228
If your wife wants a Tyrone-bot, then divorce her.
It's really sad how we've turned our culture so that men's and women's relationships completely revolve around if you'll do enough or be enough for her so that she'll be with you and have sex with you.
I'm bi so I'm just enjoying men lately cause women are too much to deal with.
No mind games, no bullshit. If you're bi I recommend you make the switch. We need to stop putting women on a pedestal and make them have more to offer than their presence and their sex appeal. That stuff gets old fast.
What the fuck is even going on with western feminism? How did this happen? These aren't the same feminists my mother and grandmother worked with.
>>705802547
Never been in a relationship like that but I have standards granted its 60-40 but I still expect her to do more than just fuck me everyday.
>>705801047
what the fuck do i care about some eurocuck prof thinks. muslim civil invasion or europe. foundation of londinistan. fuck those worthless twats. they can't even safegaurd their soon-to-be-dead civilization.
who gives two shits about the words of a dead man?
>>705802547
The divorce rate is over 50 percent, anon.
Some say it is over that for millennial. But lets say it is a coin flip.
Do you want to flip a coin for a chance to lose your house and money and sanity?
Or do you want to have the disposable income to afford a pleasant sexbot who makes you satisfied when you aren't out skydiving or scuba diving or driving your new car?
HAHAHAHAHA. MGTOW + Sexbots = end of gynocentrism. Trust it to men to engineer away our need for those utility leeching parasites. A woman's only worth is as a bag to incubate our offspring. The future will be glorious.
>>705802972
But its not the real thing I dont care how far asian science gos they cannot recrate the virgina your body knows its plastic, and if it doesn't have a self cleaning system oh lord lets just hope it dose
Chinese inventor unveils 'Jia Jia', the most realistic robot ever.
>>705803188
>>705803188
>>705803188
Your dubs say otherwise, anon.
With modern technology development rates, sexbots will be available before we are in our 40s, anon.
>>705803188
clone vag. stick in robot with support system to keep vag alive. problem solved.
if they can clone people they can clone parts of people.
or just got the whole Battle Angel Alita status and have a human body run by a brain chip.
this is some dense retard fear mongering, i smell /pol/
these are fringe groups and have no real influence on our policies
>>705803509
It's really not a bad thing it will force women to be more useful and not act like a bunch of spoiled children. They crave companionship more than men. Let them get lonely.
>>705801047
>theguardian.com
>>705803403
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2WkGtjZDpcQ
>>705801047
If all men are craven rapists that need to do things like play video games up dull our urges to rape, why would having an object we can rape at will (other than traps amirite) be a complaint?
Imagine walking in after a long day at work and saying to pic related, "Quiet mode. BLT with a beer then a neck massage while I soak in a hot bath"
>>705801047
Ok.
Women can't use dildos or vibrators anymore, though. Out of respect for men, such technology should just be rejected.
>>705801347
>They want to drive the "cost" of pussy up, making it valuable again.
>Simple economics.
This is the opposite of simple economics you fucking retard, the law of demand states that as price increases demand decreases
This is the issue with society today, growing up if I wanted to see a woman naked I had to steal my dads playboys. Millennials had the luxury of looking at porn when ever and grew up to be insecure doshs that put pussy on the pedistal, now fast forward a few years into the future, sex robots are the norm. So now you dont even have to commit to human interaction to get pussy. Do you see ehere this is going? Eventually humans will be born in test tubes and there will be no need for sexual interaction between a male and a female. Thats going fucking backwards, god allready created the perfect female body for sex, we dont need fucking robots.
Feminists are awful people.
Pic related.
And this is why I fuck escorts.
>>705801047
But sex-bots are literally the only things that are keeping me alive. If I can't have a sex-bot I'll probably have to kill a few dozen people then myself.
>>705804394
What if someone were so masochistic as to make a Lena Bot?
>It is like an episode of Star Trek: TOS
>>705801047
>Because once women are irrelevant, feminism is reduced to being a joke.
I thought feminism was already a joke.
>>705804315
no it doesn't, you retard
little thing called 'coefficient of elasticity', ever hear of it? (obviously not)
sex is a basic human need like food, if pussy is hard to get people aren't just going to decide to jerk it forever because that's ~*economically optimal*~
actually, come to think of it, maybe you would.
>>705801047
Oh the irony, almost two hundred years ago there was this idea that some women were hysterical and they could only be treated by medical sexual pleasure. Now there is this woman thinking that same should work for men. Just what kind of sick twisted mind could think that the one wrong thing we tried for the other sex should now work for the other? That we should treat some "disfunctional" men with some kind of medical sexual pleasuring? Just how narrow minded must one be to even consider this as somehow good idea?
The modern feminists are litteraly becoming the men 200 years ago in their thinking. Seeing the other sex lesser and something that should be guided. This combination of sex-positive and sex-negative feminists are creating this weird victorian world of repressed sexuality on the surfice while going wild on the other level, mostly repressing male sexuality while celebrating the females.
If feminism was for the equalilty of the both sexes, as they alwasy say reciting the dictionary definition, then if we ban the sex robots for men then for eqiality we must ban mechanised dildios for the same fucking arguments they are using. But of course they would say that that would be opressing women because fuck men. Fuck this world, guys, let's colonize Mars without women. Utopia of sex robots awaits.
>>705804394
>Look incredible
I'd rather die a virgin than touch those mutants.
>>705804738
Grandpa always said that the pussy you pay for is cheaper than the pussy you get for free.
But dick robots are fine? Fucking idiots
>>705801626
And she won't cheat, divorce you, and take half your stuff that you worked so hard to earn!
>>705805040
This. Sex is really not a want, it's a need. Not having sex fucks with your head.mpeople who don't fuck for a long time get a little crazy. Kind of explains most of the faggots here, actually...
Anyway, yeah. This is a power play by feminists. They know that if they control sex (even more than they already do, mind you), they control men.
We should all pressure our various governments to fast rack sexbot development, and in the meantime, legalize prostitution. It will be a bad world to have a penis if we don't.
>>705805485
Your Grandpa was a wise man.
Would you fuck a fat sexbot?
Hyper-realistic fatsuit exterior, synthetic "fat" stuffing, and re-enforced metal endoskeleton.
If sex robots are banned, will that ban include vibrators? Those are essentially sex robots.
>>705801047
>FEMINISTS ARE TRYING TO OUTLAW SEXBOT DEVELOPMENT
If they want to stop it they should stop being feministss and give us what sexrobots will
Nobody wants to fuck a fat landwhale who does nothing but whine all the time, men want women who behave like women and give them what they want, sexrobots will
stupid cunts
>>705804315
also, just to drive home a little further what an retard you are, there are some goods where the coefficient of elasticity is *negative*. The more expensive they are, the more of them people consume. These are called Giffen goods and also encompass certain kinds of luxury products where what you're buying is exclusivity (no millionaire wants a knockoff Lamborghini)
lrn3economics idiot
>>705801047
The whole sex bot thing is really just social engineering to make us not have kids. I want kids so I dont want a sex bot.
>>705806020
Why not? No consequences to porking a fat sexbot.
>>705801047
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCdfcUSZy6k
>>705803403
I would have sex with that robot
>>705806140
I don't want kids so I want a sexbot.
>>705801347
No more than that woman has become a victim of sexual assault when that same guy pulls off a nut thinking about her while in the bathroom.
So the answer depends on how delusional the person you ask is.
Could they repulcate say a 12 year olds body? But give her the mind of a 18 year old.
>>705801047
The feminizes would go nutz. If they came out with a male sex robot I bet you they would be all for it. Fact is they cry and call all sex rape and you shouldn't have sex unless it is all about her bla bla.
The truth about it that they are most afrade of is that men would in-fact purchase them because they don't have to be worried about tying up with a money grubbing whore that will take most of everything he owns while she is out fucking someone else. This would leave many of them to actually have to get a job and be forced to take care of themselves without a man they can leach off of. It also will lessen the ability to falsely accuse a man of rape because they were both drunk and she wakes up and realizes she fucked someone that they might not normally would, or are embarrassed because their friends know she fucked him and cries rape because she doesn't want to be embarrassed and would rather be a victim regardless to the guy whose life she just destroyed.
>>705806221
Why would you ever fuck a landwhale when you could have a woman who looks literally any way you want?
>>705806460
Because Fat Fetish.
I want a sexbot modeled after a fat Japanese woman.
>>705806607
Well, there's one more benefit to having sex bots. It'll filter degenerates like you out of the gene pool.
>>705806607
>Because Fat Fetish.
So a shit tier reason for a shit tier fetish? got it.
>>705801047
>>Maybe it’s time to take misogynistic sexual dysfunction more seriously.
I don't hate women. I love women. My wife and mother would both agree. However, I wouldn't ask either one of them to keep up with my sex drive.
>>705805040
Wow wow wow, big man with the condescension
Sex may be a basic human need, but its demand curve isn't flat- People dump their girlfriends all the time because they're too expensive. This is even more true in the case of this "market", with real pussy costing X dollars and a sex droid costing Y dollars.
Since the OP decided to make it an economic example, the law of demand clearly proves that if thinking in terms of dollars, people will pay for the sex bot instead of getting a real woman.
Also, there is absolutely no proof that sex has a negative elastic coefficient. In fact, it seems to be the opposite unless you're incredibly wealthy, as seen by people who dump their SO because they were too expensive. Pussy isn't hotter to me just because it's more expensive.
Just because negative elasticity markets exist, that doesn't disqualify the law of demand- it's called a law because by and large it is a safe assumption to make that as price increases demand decrease. That's "basic" economics, as the OP stated.
Enjoy bringing up economic shifters that aren't even relevant in the context to show ~oh how much smarter than me~ you are, though.
>>705806845
>Complaining about Degenerates
>On 4chan
>On /b/
>>705806985
You'd prefer actual fatties get humped?
>>705807304
No, I'd prefer no fat women or fat women sex bots to be around.
>>705801047
Feminists have no sympathy. They don't want to be with ugly losers and they don't want those losers to find happiness elsewhere. They are like the ultimate bully. All betas should suffer for life.
>>705807121
"People dump their gfs all the time because they are too expensive." Says the perma virgin.
>>705806359
What's a 'Homocide' ?..
>>705801047
Has everyone fucking gone retarded? Feminists were always retarded and lived in a fantasy reality so it's no surprise that they're actually trying to pass laws to stop some sci fi shit from happening in the modern day.
But now we have these male equivalent of feminists who genuinely believe that the human race can reproduce by sex with robots. I support MGTOW idiots like this to fuck robots for the same reason I support feminists to have abortions. Because then they can't fuck up the gene pool any worse than it already is.
Back to bashing feminists. Has political correctness gone so far that they care about the emotions of the emotionless? Are the robots quite literally 'triggered'? Should I check my living organism privilege kek. Maybe in the distant future they'll have emotions but today they are nothing more than a bunch of nuts, bolts, wires and rubber. They don't care if you "objectify" them because that's just what they they are; objects. Nothing more. SJWs need to calm down with the sci fi films. They're like children; mistaking films for reality.
Pic related: They never complained about him being sexualized.
>>705807581
Sexbots are inherently "degenerate" anyway. They're a sign males have given up.
So we might as well make our sexbots fit our respective needs.
>>705807817
When you're talking about dating in terms of economics (as we are in this discussion), that is one of the few economic reasons that one would leave their SO. I don't mean literally all the time, but it's relevant to the discussion and it does happen- but I've never ever heard of someone leaving their SO because they didn't want enough.
>>705807581
No one gives a shit what you want, they will make them anyways.
>>705807927
So make male sexbots first and shut the feminists up.
We all get to fuck robots.
>>705801047
Women want to ban these because they'll lose the monopoly on sex that they currently have. Once these are real, the beta male who actually puts up with these insufferable cunts enough to marry them will just save themselves the hassle and empty their balls into a sex robot, removing the aforementioned kind of woman's power.
>>705801347
For every lawsuit of this kind there wil be 10 women looking to cash in. I would gladly lay down hard earned money for the Staci Silverstone model sex robot. Of course I would also like the cooking and cleaning upgrade package
>>705808059
The guy I was responding to clearly gave enough of a shit to ask.
>>705808070
I support that too because that's even less feminists reproducing unfortunately feminists will make up some "social stigma" behind it and complain about that too.
>>705805856
I second this.
>>705801347
You can already buy Emma Watson sexdoll heads on eBay. This will be the catylist.
>>705802195
>implying a woman can afford to buy anything on her own
>>705808070
Also forgot to mention
>We all get to fuck robots.
It shouldn't get to that because then the human race would die out.
>>705807880
fucked to death by another man
>>705808606
So thats how we got to extinction.
>>705808374
Complaining about degeneracy concerning fat sexbots is hypocritical. They're sexbots, and thus inherently unnatural.
If we make them, they will be made to our respective sexual desires.
>>705808670
>fucked to death
Also known as getting "Fleeced"
>>705808835
>Complaining about degeneracy concerning fat sexbots is hypocritical. They're sexbots, and thus inherently unnatural.
I never brought up the argument.
>>705801047
>feminism is reduced to being a joke
Isn't it already?
>>705808791
>>705808606
We won't allow ourselves to go extinct.
>>705801047
Enjoy
>>705804394
>feminists
>people
Please choose one.
>>705809647
Sadly, it is thriving on every college campus and every place where a woman can delude herself that she is of higher value and more interesting than she actually is.
>>705808550
Wtf you're not even exaggerating.....although this says it's only the head for a 12-inch doll
>>705809797
Sexbots now, pl0x.
This article pisses me off. SJWs have been pushing a politically correct agenda for years. You can't bully:
>gays
>transgendered
>minorities
>the 'differently abled'
>Mentally handicapped
>etc
So why is bullying betas who can't get laid still fair game? The only people interested in sexbots are people who have failed so miserably with real women that they have given up and this guy in the article treats these men like they are monsters. Ever consider there might be something wrong with how women and society treats men? Nope, if you fail with women you must be a misogynist loser. Actual misogynists have no trouble getting laid. Just let the poor guys have their sexbots, so they can get some semblance of happiness in their otherwise miserable lives.
>>705801047
It would also be a good opportunity for some to make money. You can already buy licensed flesh light molds of porn star pussy.
>>705808564
Homos would be the primary market anyways.
>>705804394
Just threw up in my mouth
Seriously. There will be sexbots for all manner of fetishes; and the more the tech is perfected, the more perverted the designs will get.
>>705809946
>>705804778
I would do this.
>>705809824
Someone posted a 1:1 latex one a few days ago.
>>705810244
I don't get the appeal, either. Assuming there is one.
>>705810123
>You can't bully
Watch me.
>>705801722
>actually thinking any of this will happen
>believing most women wouldn't be relieved to not have to deal with you flopping all over them
you dumb cucks
>>705801626
Dude, if it does half of this I don't mind if it needs a power cord.
I would think women would welcome sexbots. Think for a minute who would realistically spend hundreds if not thousands of dollars for a sex robot? All the creeps that are only interested in sex and controlling a woman. Also maybe the anti-social types that can't figure out dating. It removes all them from the dating pools. You really think a normal guy will spend that kind of money?
>>705810666
>believing Satan, the father of all lies.
My faith protects me from your misdirection, beast.
>>705801047
Feminists trying to outlaw sexbots is like older women making fun of a man their age who dates a 20 year old.
Jealousy, envy and control.
Women are all about jealousy, envy and control.
Sexbots take away their control.
>>705801626
pls when will this come out
>>705811111
>that get
>>705811111
omfg
>>705811111
Nani?
>>705811111
oh my fuck what did i just do
>>705801047
>the guardian
At least once I'd like to be surprised.
>>705805485
Wise old man. After marriage I second to this.
>>705811444
AHHHHHHHH CHRIST I DID IT AGAIN!
>>705811444
IMPOSSIBLE
What Does It Waaaaaaaaaant?
>>705802417
That picture is terrifying. SHE'S STARING INTO MY SOUL! SHE'S STARING INTO MY SOUL!
>>705802515
This
>>705811444
>>705811111
I would play the lottery today if I were you, anon.
>>705811707
couldn't hurt, today was payday
If women are going to outlaw female sex bots, I think men should outlaw dildoes and vibrators.
>>705802228
>What im saying is what if women use this technology to replace men for sex bots that are actuall able to give them orgasums.
If Stacy has difficulty having an orgasm because a baseball bat isn't shoved up her twat, then she needs to close her legs and get her shit together.
>>705811678
MomBot loves you, anon. She wants to snuggle you the way your ex-wife never could.
>>705801047
Yet they've had vibrators the minute the technology was available. Gtfo
>>705811111
>>705811444
this is now a get thread
i have magic powers
>>705812152
O really?
>>705802547
But you see the problem with feminism and all of this bullshit women empowerment is that it teaches women that they don't need to learn how to cook or clean or do wifely duties. It teaches them to be fucking harpies, and become so foreign that the only use they have is the wet box between their legs. Making them completely useless to any respectable man.
Feminism is a cancer that will ruin this world. Even worse than it already is.
Just think about the revenue these companies will generate. They'll be able to hire the absolute best lawyers and crush any and all feminist opposition. It's just a matter of time
>>705812398
>>705812435
What if they have women CEO - OH MY GOD THAT GET!
>>705806336
Enjoy your party v&, faggot.
>>705812571
If they have a women CEO in charge of a sexbot company that supplies it to men, she's already batting for the male team. And if she even attempted sabotage, she'd get run into the ground so hard she'll go back to the Stone age.
>>705812707
>Implying the govt can control what robot exists.
Have fun trying to prosecute a fucking robot owner.
>>705811111
Quints demands it
>>705801626
Ill take two
>>705801047
>Maybe it’s time to take GENDER DYSPHORIA more seriously. Maybe people who want to MUTILATE THEIR GENITALS AND CRAM HORMONES INTO THEIR SYSTEMS need to present the agreement of a couple of doctors, before they are judged emotionally restricted enough to need to retreat to such an inhuman fantasy OF DEFYING THEIR VERY GENETICS. Or maybe, out of respect for HUMANITY, this PRACTICE OF CATERING TO CONFUSED LUNATICS should just be rejected.
Hmm, don't think this would be well received
watched lars and the real girl recently. pic is realdoll2. we have the technology people. I for one am willing to bear the blame when dolls like this run amok in a frenzy of blood and gore upon the human race.
>>705812993
Its still in the likeness of a minor, faggot.
>>705806336
A woman doesn't really have any depth of personality from late teens to about 30 unless she gets married or has kids. So either go for 30+ or early teens for a personality. Otherwise you just get a vapid, boring girl obsessed with social climbing.
>>705802547
>I'm Bi
LOL, no, you're gay. Embrace your homotry.
>>705813290
Loli is legal and so are sex dolls made to look like underage girls. How would this be any different?
>>705801047
>mfw trannies are making the worst investment in their lives.
The pussy market is only going down from here.
>>705813172
Of course not, anon. What year do you think this is? The current year, of course.
>>705813290
Loli is legal and sex dolls depicting minors are legal as well. What's your argument for that?
>>705813538
>It's impossible to be attracted to both guys and girls
Ok friendo.
>>705813558
Party v& is be gonna watching people who buy kiddie sexdolls.
>>705804315
You fucking retard. Demand for pussy isn't changing.
And cost is more dependent on demand and supply then the other way around.
If the supply of pussy is unlimited then all the demand will be met then some.
>>705807927
>>705804321
Blames everything on millennials. Sex dolls created by X and y tho. Designed by boomers
>>705807938
Degenerate? Or evolutionary? The feminist genes will be weeded out of the pool.
>>705807938
>woman owns a sex toy
"She's in charge of her sexuality, don't shame her!"
>man owns a sex toy
"He's pathetic and has given up!"
Fuck off feminazi, no one likes you or your dried up vag!
>>705801626
Honestly it might be easier to just take a real woman and do some brain surgery to her.
>>705803188
>they cannot recrate the virgina
>>705805324
You fool. Men don't need anything but pussy. Men don't talk to women because they like talking to women, they only want pussy. Thats all there is to it.
>>705801047
just take pleasure in knowing that no one and nothing can defeat the free market
if some people can make money with this it WILL happen
>>705808070
>So make male sexbots first and shut the feminists up.
Except that's not what feminists want from their "men". They want someone they can manipulate and feel power over, while playing the victim card. An inanimate object does nothing for their perversion.
>>705814028
>You fucking retard. Demand for pussy isn't changing.
In the context of this thread, which is sex robots, yeah. It would be.
>And cost is more dependent on demand and supply then the other way around.
true but OP's statement is still backwards
>If the supply of pussy is unlimited then all the demand will be met then some.
yes
what is your point? I was just pointing out OP's statement of "They want to drive the "cost" of pussy up, making it valuable again. Simple economics." as being retarded as he's using economic terms when he obviously understands absolutely nothing about even the basic concept of demand.
>>705810380
This is clearly a wooden chess piece polisher.
>this thread
>>705805805
Sex is a need like food that is true. However the sex bots are like creating the technology to instantly create artificial meat through cloning. Steaks that cost 40 dollars are going to cost 5.
>>705803188
>gos
>recrate the virgina
>dose
you have to be 18+ to post here
>>705813288
You know there's a fan theory that the Terminators are sexbots that turned on their masters. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2kRiwGUxfI
>>705810666
>implying
But this means that women will actually have to work to live.
>>705814825
Part of the feminist ad campaign, maybe lol?
More MomBot.
>>705802750
Replace feminist with Autists then you get your answer.
>>705802972
Had me at new car.
>>705803188
>never tried a fleshlight
Dude, shit's pretty damn close. And it beats a caterwauling feminist all day, every day. The only thing it doesn't beat is a women who knows how to screw. Which once we get AI sufficiently developed to where your fleshlight can fuck you, all bets will be off.
All the critical technology items exist independently at the moment, all it takes is some good systems integration and investment and product iteration.
Do feminists show this much outrage toward gay people? I know I've seen at least one article, but it seems they should be freaking out over the rise in homosexuality.
>>705815528
And a robust test program.
>How would you like to be in system test for sexbots, anon?
Imagine that resume entry
it would be easier and cheaper in the long run to just install attitude adjustment chips in females at birth.
>>705815642
They hate gays. Plain and simple, and only because gays take men they can't manipulate.
>>705815642
There are some that are (i.e. tumblrites), and many freak out over Milo's antics. The true misandrists that hide in their ranks hate all men, gays included.
>>705807979
Eg. My insanely hot girlfriend flunked out of college and doesn't have a job. Pussy was fire. Couldn't deal with her having 0 money, so I moved to across the country to CO to ski and poke legal smot.
>>705815703
>Yeah, so just fuck this robot and make sure to give good haptic feedback.
If you encounter any problems be sure to let your operator know.
>>705813961
Hate to break it to you, you're already being watched.
>>705816279
this all day, shaggy-poster btfo
>>705801875
>>705807817
>>705805856
I third it.
>>705814574
No one? God damn, y'all need some help
>>705802228
>What im saying is what if women use this technology to replace men
the difference is, women rely on men for everything
men rely on women for sex
so its a false equivalence
>>705804394
>look incredible.
they look drunk and contemplating suicide.
>>705805485
Yep. I worked it out:
6 years of marriage,
>after divorce, alimony, "half" the assets of the marriage:
$2600 per fuck
Women have an odometer in their brain, they price each and every fuck session. So why shouldn't we?
Can you imagine the Platinum grade escort I could buy with twenty-six fucking hundred dollars?
Honestly, feminazis can't stop the sexbot train. Oh sure, they will complain about it for page views and attention, but its all just talk.
Japan already had robots, they just need to get smashed together with RealDolls and it's done. And the fact of the matter is robots will become household objects not because of the sex, but because they free us from chores (aka menial labor).
No more hiring maid services, butlers or cooks when you have have a handy robot do all that shit for you. Just look at the Rhoomba's success for proof.
>>705814825
What if its the feminists that are sexbots that turned on their masters?
>>705814825
>You know there's a fan theory that the Terminators are sexbots that turned on their masters
wat
>>705814825
>4 borderline anorexic skeletons with skin
>implying the top row isn't already hotter
top kek, or is it supposed to be sarcastic?
>>705806359
How can you look at this graph for 2 seconds and not realize that it proves nothing?
1. While suicide victims are mostly men, women are much more likely to attempt suicide.
2. Men commit more violent crimes, obviously the average sentence is longer.
3. Men commit more homicides*. Women are much more likely to be victims of domestic abuse.
4. Obviously there are more male combat deaths. Barely any women enlist! Saying that men have it worse because they have more deaths is meaningless.
5. etc.
If you're gonna bash on feminism, at least use sound arguments.
>>705814985
You think sexbots are coming onto the market before workbots? Kek
Blow-up doll are next
then fleshlights.
>>705813290
likeness of an (actual) minor.
You forgot that part. Unless it's depicting an actual person, it's legal.
>>705820854
Found the femenazi
This is a gross exgeeration of the real argument. Fuck 4bsll.
>>705815703
yeah except the first round of test subjects will probably have their dicks ripped off by it or electricuted. in the name of science!
>>705815807
I dont think they really hate gays, if you disagree please do explain
>>705820854
1-Attempt suicide, get all of the support
2-What about fake reports? A man was sentenced to jail beacuse a woman dreamed that he raped her.
3-While the other part of women are Gold diggers and puppet masters of their husbands and use them.
4-Male soldiers fought so you could talk shit on the internet, women won't enlist cause priviliege of being physically weaker and the average women couldn't bear the average 100 punds men carry on them
>>705820854
>women are much more likely to attempt suicide.
When women attempt suicide, they don't plan on succeeding.
>>705820854
It will only be outlawed in America. Just like sexy video games, the entire world can have them but the US
>>705820854
women are actually more likely to be the abuser in domestic violence. men just dont report it because they arent pussies, or because theyre afraid of being seen as pussies, or its down played because theres noooooo way that the woman could do any real damage right?
you all are complete fucking idiots
>>705801626
Nigga I'm onboards, she don't have that crazy outburst right, she wakes every morning like a queen all majestic and shitt?
>>705821349
>FOR SCIENCE
>>705822409
no u
>>705822409
this is correct
>>705810899
>>705801047
They can just make their own sexbots, that way no one will see each other ever so harassment will be impossible, they will have their perfect man and vise versa, everybody wins.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IDv3p2h8jvM
ROBOT GANGBANG!
>>705801047
> bullshit I made up
Pls. I don't gaf about the ramblings of 3 idiots no one but you listens to, to complain about on 4chan
Sooo chobits is becoming reality?
>>705822409
You seem like a cum guzzling retard who should have had an ice pick lobotomy, but that's beside the point faggot.
Damn hot caprica
Anyone check out that thread a week ago where anon dumped that comic about an irresistible fuck doll?
>>705824909
YES
Hah, you really think corporations are just going to sit there and take it at the risk of losing trillions in profits?
Can't wait for affordable sex robots. At first they're gonna be expensive as balls.
No one else would be scared of having a robot in the house after you're sleeping? Not sure. I'd probably have to lock it in a safe or a shed after I was finished with it.
>>705826651
Just turn it off
>>705808606
Good
>>705801047
I would give my right leg for a cylon sexbot...
>>705827219
You wouldn't. Fucking would be pretty difficult without a leg.
Just think about China man. There are like twice as many men as women which means that half of them will never get married or quite possibly never even get laid.
Now let's say America buys a Japanese robotics company and starts selling sex bots to Japan. That's like a billion fucking robots and that's not including upgrades and repairs and new models.
Singlehandedly fix the American economy and the gender gap in The People's Republic.
>>705827893
>>705801047
Why dont any of you make some?
Yall keep about it and do nothing
I'd totally buy an XJ9 bot with the original sound , anyone else?
>>705821752
Preach brother
>>705801047
And this is how Bladerunner begins.
>>705801347
That's actually an Intellectual Property issue. You don't need fancy feminist crap like psychic rape to get there.
Name, Image, and Likeness are understood to be property with real economic value. You can't sell an unauthorized sexbot clone for the same reason that you can't slap their face on a billboard to sell your product.
>>705828296
I can't be the only one
>>705827559
Doable.
Worth it.
>>705812435
Amazing get progression. Truly Kek has smiled upon this thread.
>>705801998
kek.gif
Once they fail to outlaw sexbots they'll focus on making those same sexbots fatties because 'real woman have curves'.
