>>767372175
It makes muslim babies
>>767372175
Nothing.
Your camera however...
>>767372175
biggest problem is it's a muslim who is alive
The fact that it’s on a muslim
>>767372175
Looks good to me I guess?
>>767372175
No clit and no inner labia. Female circumcision at an early age is fairly normal.
>>767372175
Id lick it
>>767372175
I need more, for the science
it tastes like the qur'an
>>767372288
Clit removal is just pure cruelty.
>>767375349
no you cuck
>>767375435
If women enjoy sex (clit plays a big role in this), they will be more passionate and willing, which in return makes the sex much better. How is being against genital mutilation a cuck thing, exactly?
>>767375652
Because you typed this essay
>>767375652
do you only cry for women or do you
understand that forced male circumcision is also
giant bullshit? if so, i revoke my statement
>>767372175
>muslim pussy
That's Jew pussy.
>>767375898
Oh boi we have a meninist over here.
>>767375898
Forced male circumcision is also bullshit.
>>767375775
>essay
That's literally two sentences.
>>767375936
oh goy we have a jew here
>>767372175
I might be wrong, but it looks like her clitoris is gone.
If that is the case, that's whats wrong.
Nothing except YOU REPOST THIS EVERY DAY!
>>767376266
Welcome to /b/ newfag
>>767376212
you might be able to answer one question:
is this thread jewish or russian spam?
>>767375936
> uses leninist unironically.
If men and women are to be considered equals, forced genital mutilation of men is just as wrong as forced genital mutilation of women.
The amount of damage depending on the method will vary, but the lack bodily autonomy in either party is equally wrong.
>>767376212
Kek
>>767376362
>leninist
stupid autocorrect, meninist*
>>767372175
It's attached to a muslim and makes more muslims, it must be destroyed as a weapon of terror.
>>767376404
>>767376465
I was correcting myself.
>>767376574
china has the answer
>>767372175
nice innie vag
the only downside is that it's on a mudslime
>>767376864
they are spreading like rats - thats a
simple fact.
they don't give a fuck
about world population because they lack
of intelligence.
>>767376969
So what is a REALISTIC solution?
>>767377141
realistic is not the global civil war against them
but simply birth control by government - 1 child per muslim "woman".
>>767377233
Why put woman in quotations?
She might be an adherent of a very flawed and dangerous idea, but that doesn't make her not a woman.
>>767377233
And how will such a policy ever be supported, let alone enforced and followed?
>>767372212
/thread
>>767376465
this is what happens when people save le meemay pics and are too retarded to understand when to use them
circumcise yourself please, remove your entire dick in the off chance you may one day have sex
>>767377373
do you call female apes "woman"?
okay, then better "hairy subhuman woman"
is that okay for you?
>>767372175
There is a Bomb inside
>>767375349
This. Unconscionable. Fuck.
>>767377398
in china it worked - but in the EU and USA that will not happen because jews
>>767377539
So it's not a realistic solution at all, correct? What is a true, doable solution?
>>767372175
It's upside down. Problem solved
>>767377498
Well you're technically right in calling her an ape, where you go wrong is thinking that it reflects badly on her, with total disregard to the fact that you are the same species of ape.
>>767377490
this
>>767377811
species maybe but a different race.
"woman" with more body hair then me, i put in
quotations.
>>767377610
1. an hero
2. following the jewish
plan and erase muslims from this planet - but who wants the third world war?
3. don't give a fuck and make a happy living.
>>767377490
You told him
>>767378041
Huh okay, well that is in opinion territory and you're entitled to yours, just don't confuse it with fact.
>>767378636
well it is a fact, that i put hairy "woman" in
quotations.
but in the case of "opinion territory":
- it is considered being not normal is normal
- but it is a matter of Gauß, that being normal
is more normal then not being normal
This is one of your thinking errors, thank me later.
>>767379582
When I look up Gauß I get a reclusive German mathematician who made enemies with other mathematicians.
What are you on about?
Also the fact that you put woman in quotations, has no bearing on whether hairy women would be considered women to the rest of humanity.
>>767379972
dude, your generation lacks in the understanding
of normal distribution. that is because you are getting tricked in your imagination of the term normal. i only wanted to help you to get over it.
the fact that you had to look up gauß makes me leave you underage murifag alone.
"the rest of humanity" - normally men do not prefer their women to look like men - but you cannot understand the term "normal" because you are under educated and probably underage and fucked up by media
>>767380415
I'm 30 and Danish, so something might have been lost in translation while you were summing up an idea to the point of it becoming cryptic.
But good on you for trying to browbeat me by assuming my level of education, age and nationality.
Also normal is a spectrum, what is normal in some places, is abnormal in other places.
You opinion is probably formed from you growing up in a place where women aren't generally as hairy. Don't you think people who grow up in places where everyone is hairy as fuck, would think her being hairy inconsequential and focus on whatever other cultural markers they consider attractive?
>>767372175
there's ISIS in there
>>767381022
okay, in places where women are hairy as fuck - they get rid of it. they don't do it because of western influence, they do it because it is normal for a woman to have less hair than men. you cannot accept the fact, that some things are normal dude.
but i don't blame you, at least you are trying to argument. but please allow yourself to think without fear. that would be a progress
bye mister
>>767381411
Nobody has mentioned western influence but you.
You're persisting in assuming that your opinion is the norm everywhere and that everyone has the quality of life to the point of being hairy, becoming a problem.
Also in what way am I thinking with fear?
You were the one removing the label of woman from other people because of a preference. Seems a bit fearful of difference in others, instead of just going "I prefer women who shave".
>>767381827
fear in the way of being afraid that "women" means anything disrespectful - and yes, it was meant disrespectful. because hating something is normal and having fear to hate is not normal but a form of toxic social justice that is limiting you ability to think.
seems a bit fearful of hating differences in others, instead of just going "i hate hairy muslims "women"
>>767382420
You're projecting an awful lot onto me anon.
I was questioning why you were doing it and you went on about hair.
I'm not a sjw trying to virtue signal on behalf of hairy muslim women, I was just reacting to what basically amounts to saying "unless you like blue cheese, you're not a real man".
You can hate whoever you want, but then say that instead of asserting your opinion as fact.
>>767382703
i wanted to make an implicit announcement about my opinion on muslim "women".
that is the final answer to your question.
have a good evening dane
