g/fur
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
g/fur
Hey
>>711787110
Howdy.
Do you guys put objects into your shit funnel?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=on1t6pzubgo
>>711787215
TBH I don't understand bottoms.
Tried it with a finger, kind of felt like a piece of shit was stuck in my ass, not pleasurable.
And ur catto is prolly just sleeping
Who is still around?
>>711787358
Us it seems.
I'm always here :^)
>>711787394
Us and Them?
>>711787400
Yes, but who are you?
>>711787444
Indeed.
I tossed it out already.
>>711787473
And after all, we're only ordinary men?
>>711787513
I wouldn't call myself ordinary.
>>711787513
>ordinary
>>711787537
Me and you?
>>711787586
You seem to know a lot about what is ordinary. Perhaps you could answer a few questions for me.
>>711787686
>You seem to know a lot about what is ordinary.
Yeah, I guess.
God only knows it's not what we would choose to do.
>>711787724
Tell me, what is ordinary?
>>711787686
You and I. Together we fly, in the sky, oh so high.
>inb4 those happen to be actual song lyrics, and my seemingly original and shitty poetry isn't original at all
>>711787764
Things that society deem average dictated by culture, geology, and in some cases, religions and folklore.
Trying pretty hard to explain an abstract concept physically
"Forward," he cried, from the rear and the front rank died. And the general sat as the lines on the map moved from side to side.
>>711787853
It's from opening verse from the song Us and Them by Pink Floyd. It's on their Dark Side of the Moon album, the greatest album ever recorded.
>>711787873
But what is average?
>>711788054
Of course.
>>711787853
Also, don't sell yourself short, your poetry is both shitty and uninspired.
>>711788054
You give me a serial killer vibe
Something that is common among a population
>>711788087
I'm aware.
>>711788108
I think the same. He's a weird dude, but he's cool.
>>711788083
Have you not heard the album?
>>711788108
What is common?
>>711788147
I should have by now, but no.
Cnt believe the sculptor is in fur thred.....wht is up my dude
>>711788147
A certain trait, that if you took a whole population, would show up most of the time.
I don't have a dictionary
>>711788164
I own two different copies on vinyl, an original pressing and a German import that plays 40% slower. I also have two different versions on CD, the original and the remastered. You really ought to listen to it.
>>711788206
Who are you?
>>711788219
What would you call most of the time?
>>711788262
>what would you call most of the time?
What point are you trying to make?
>>711788206
Uh, he's *from* the fur threads, mate.
>>711788262
That's pretty sick, man.
I know. There's a lot I've been meaning to listen to, but I'm so far into the the metal genre and its subgenres that it's hard to escape.
>>711788337
It's entirely possible to be involved in multiple genres. I listen to Progressive Rock, Dream Pop, Disco, New Wave, Postrock, Sadcore, Country, Shoegaze, Stadium Rock, Delta Blues, Modal Jazz, Hardbop, Bebop, and several different genres of rap.
>>711788333
I'm only asking questions. So let's go over the premise that you've established. Ordinary is anything that occurs at least a part of the time in a given population?
>>711788529
Oh yeah, I know. It's just hard to escape once you find your niche. One day I'll sit down and listen to some classic rock albums.
>>711788529
Yeah, pretty much.
>>711788262
fellow sculptor...huge fan of your work
>>711788584
>dem socks
Must... post.
>>711787215
got one in there right now
Who was that guy who had the thing with anon dicks?
>>711788584
I found my niche, it's Dreampop, but I still easily listen to other genres.
>>711788586
So anything can be normal if it occurs at least sometime?
>>711788613
>huge fan of your work
Don't lie to me.
>>711788719
If it occurs very often
uuuuuu
>>711788752
But how often is very often?
>>711788801
i'd say over 40% of the time
>>711788719
r u kidding me...the head is the most important human body prt. your figure and bold features are a love letter to an ancient practice...
>>711788876
But what if something occurs only once every few years? Would that still be considered ordinary?
>>711788887
We get it, you're insulting me.
>>711788956
if it had a set schedule, i guess
someone talk to luna
>>711788988
snufs
hi hello
you are my favourite how are you my love
>>711789018
But what if the schedule was once every 100 years? Would it still be normal?
>>711789025
oh hello darling
my intestinal tract is trying to kill me again
otherwise I'm well, you?
>>711789076
>>711789055
>>711789041
STOP AUTODUMPING AND PAY ATTENTION TO ME YOU GOON
>>711789095
Yeah
>>711789122
goon? I resent that
I'm a geezer
Snuggles, hello.
>>711789130
But if it only occurs once in a person's life, could you still consider it normal?
>>711789182
Yes
>>711789109
terrible actually that's why I'm here in the first place
I've been enduring an unending anxiety attack for the last ~17 hours and my last available sounding board just left for work so basically I just want to not feel alone right now lest I make bad decisions.
>>711789164
Sorry, grandpa
>>711789225
So a mass extinction can be considered normal?
Snuggles is younger than I am, and I'm not even thirty.
>>711787317
>Tried it with a finger, kind of felt like a piece of shit was stuck in my ass, not pleasurable.
You didn't stimulate the prostate... You have to be able to ignore or not read the sensation you felt as uncomfortable. Then you have to stimulate the prostate to get the good feelings. Also the outside anal ring can feel good if you are real gentle.
Also, for some bottoms (like me), but not all, the "uncomfortable" feeling people describe actually feels good as well. I think it's actually kindof a neutral feeling, but it feels good to me because i have associated it with sex since a very young age.
>TBH I don't understand bottoms
Also ,you dont have to. Just fuck us. There's too many guys who like it up the bum and not enough guys to fuck all of us.
>>711789274
Mass extinction doesn't have a schedule to it
>>711789435
What about genocide? Or war? Do not both of these things occur quite often?
>>711789182
i really didnt mean to insult you, because i respect someone whos hobby requires a lot of dedication. i learned a lot tonight, and its to be honest. so ill be honest, im not a sculptor nor have i seen your work, or work like it for that matter. i am more captivated by this anonymous avatar you have adopted in this thread that focuses strictly on another art. It really is bold. faces with same features, as if it is the same face over and over. never stop sculptor bro.
Better yet... be switch and do both. I mean.. Nothing like a dick up the butt or dick up someone else's butt. Both are good. =3. Although if the top is good, being a bottom is more fun. Shit top = nopes.
>>711789554
Yeah, I understand, I'm no good and it's annoying that I'm posting these.
>>711789536
They occur often, sure.
However they're difficult to predict and don't have a distinctive pattern
>>711789581
Same. I really like both, and want a vers partner, but i would settle for a top.
>>711789736
So a pattern is what determines what is ordinary?
>>711789675
:( way better than I can do. i find them really really theraputic, if you were selling one i would buy one and put it next to my bed. honestly dont know what to tell you, im kind of tearing up looking at these. its insane and you dont gotta believe me. i came here to look at gay fur, but these little figures of yours are really captivating.
>>711789889
Right, they're shit. You can stop, I get it, we all understand that you don't like them.
snufs doesn't wanna talk to luna...
>>711789839
Not necessarily.
A pattern makes something normal. And everything normal that happens often is then called ordinary
>>711790066
So ordinary is also abnormal?
>>711789953
it hurts you dont believe me but i get it. i hope one day you can look at your creations and feel proud. im proud, sleepy, even, but most of all feel like a jerk for even starting this. dont put yourself down. i really appreciated this talk with you, whoever you are. gn
>>711790143
No.
Everything ordinary has to be normal.
>>711789739
Well... I'm single. :V
>>711790265
But if not everything that is normal has to be ordinary, then why can't anything that is abnormal be?
>>711790389
Because ordinary is by definition a subgroup of normal.
Is it a joke to be a top or switch if you've got a small cock?
>>711790561
Then wouldn't we have to define normal?
>>711790363
Forgot the imagine. `~`
>>711790618
Not really. Some people like smaller cocks. Not everyone is a size queen/king. As long as your partner is happy, everything is good.
>>711790626
We don't have to define it. Every society created their own definition of the term. You just have to pick one
>>711790778
So it's arbitrary?
>>711789388
If I could find someone like you who actually takes care of themselves, I would be happy.
>>711790846
Sure.
From an objective perspective it is.
>>711791079
So there is no such thing as ordinary?
Who here is small and wants to rub dicks?
>>711791244
Small in stature?
Is this shota thread?
i am small and capable of rubbing a dick... close enough?
>>711791305
Clearly it is not.
>>711791386
Whaaaaat?!
>>711791342
Do you have a lanky, fit kind of body?
>>711791439
This thread is designed for me to post fucking meaningless objects that I created and for people to get pissed and then insult me about them.
>>711791535
not really, no
I'm like.. average build
I'm in decent shape though
>>711791633
But you're very interested in rubbing small dicks?
>>711791539
ehm...okaay.
F-fuck you, retard-anon.
Thats ok?~
>>711791710
only if i like the cock-bearer a lot
also you keep using "dicks" plural
only one at a time pls
>>711791633
You like small dicks only?
>>711791773
I-I'm not picky... It's about the feelings and the emotions and the love and stuff...
>>711791711
Why not?
>>711791767
You might like me if you get to know me...
(You're probably in freaking Oregon or Wyoming or Alberta or the like, though, damn it...)
>>711791842
I'm in BC and I am in a monogamous relationship... Where are you?
>>711791827
Oh good. Wanna snuggle?
>>711791886
In the U.S. south, alas...
Monogamous relationships are great, though, agreed. Wish I could visit Canada. Really do.
wait am I talking to more than one person? This is confusing...
>>711791985
Normal-sized dick guy wants romantic cuddling while small-sized dick guy wants romantic handjobs. And also cuddling.
>that feel when you sucked off your ex but he never came in your mouth
>>711792115
I wanna give handjob too >_>
>>711792229
>or even on your face
>>711792115
I want to cuddle, but im open to doing more...
>>711792229
why?!
I've never done a hand job though I do not know how...
>>711792229
>>711792238
>>711792267
>>711792358
>>711792426
Having friendly hands on you is a virtue that everyone should experience.
>>711792426
We sadly weren't together for that long, and didn't have that many intimate sessions with each other. For what it was, though, it was magical.
>>711792449
Read some male-on-male erotica? I mean the kind of written by actual bi/gay men and not like straight fan-girls.
>>711792555
idk I don't like erotica...
>>711792484
>tfw ive only been able to cuddle nonsexually with boys
...snuggles still make me diamonds. Its embarassing.
>>711792622
Learn by trying it. The best way to learn is to explore someones body.
>>711792647
Snuggles are fucking based.
>>711792622
Since 75% or more of sex is the emotional intimacy and the nature of the feelings, just have your guy and play around with him.
>>711792691
but I'm lonely and socially retarded I don't have a guinea pig... Never kissed a boy and I'm like 21 now
>>711792745
we... cant
>>711792695
They are, but most people dont appreciate constant dick stabbing.
>>711792784
Kissless? You are 2 pure 2 qt.
>>711792784
In fairness a lot of people don't first-kiss and first-sex until they're in their 20s.
>>711792935
its just cause boys don't like me to begin with
>>711792985
i know. i don't regret it that much. gets to me sometimes, though
>>711793051
I bet lots of boys like you. Why wouldnt they?
>>711792784
Ugh, come to the U.S. babe...
>>711793210
because I push them away and am mean to them because socially retarded and scared of people
every boy I've ever asked to go out with me has turned me down and that number is not insignificant
>>711793295
no pls
>>711793322
Yes, come and be snuggled hard.
>>711791968
The south, excluding parts of Texas, are disgusting.
>>711793322
:C thats a pretty bad streak of luck. Im sorry.
>>711793478
It's hard to generalize: so much of, say, rural Alabama is a wasteland while Texas in the particularly geologically blessed areas can strike you with their beauty.
>>711793545
idk I don't think it's luck
I have issues
>>711793406
probably wouldn't turn out well
>>711793678
Issues make you human. Id hug you regardless.
>>711793678
Just let yourself be all submissive and wanting.
>>711793664
West Texas, out in the scorching hot desert, is the best part of Texas. North Texas, is a literal hellzone of industrial farms and oilfields which have stripped all the land of its natural beauty, Central Texas is okay if you like the woods but does have some wonderful meadows, East and South Texas are muggy swamps. I am in Central Texas.
>>711793783
a disproportionately large amount of issues
>>711793803
on the inside maybe but it can never be that simple
>>711793942
Do you ever think about being breeded?
>>711794198
Often.
>>711793942
Be who you want. We dont care as much about your issues here.
Im going to pass out. Gnight.
>>711794264
Would you French kiss your dom and snuggle tightly after he empties out himself?
>>711794364
idk I'd probably be busy having a panic attack and/or crying my eyes out
>>711794296
I know. That's why I come here. Nobody ever judges unless it's for no reason.
Have a nice sleep lovely. Thank you for talking at Luna. <3
>>711794198
The word you are looking for is bred.
>>711794615
I like both.
>>711795371
Breeded is not a word.
we have the best words, folks
I sort of want to stop going to the only 24 hour coffee shop in town because there is a group of people who are always there that talk loudly about stupid things. They think being populist leftists is radical and dangerous. They also say extremely stupid bullshit. No, being angry at your parents does not constitute an existential crisis. No, hip hop did not start with The Sugar Hill Gang. No, The Big Bang Theory is not a brilliant show. No, saying you don't believe in God is not controversial.
>They think being populist leftists is radical and dangerous
yeah this is basically every single human being I interact with on a daily basis, college students are unspeakably naive
They are not college students. You can tell the college students from the people who aren't. Namely it's the books and computers, but also the conversations are about whatever class they are taking.
I was talking about my "radicals", not yours. I don't really know the non-college type that well.
There are real radicalists out there. Populists are not radicalists.
I don't interact with enough real ones. None of my contemporaries could concoct a good molotov with a fucking grant.
Being a radicalism is not synonymous with violence.
Sure, but that's the FUN part of radicalism.
*Being a radicalist
I vehemently disagree. Violence is not fun. It's not even necessary.
>not fun
We'll agree to disagree there. Maybe I grew up on too many video games.
>not even necessary
Categorically false. If two parties with differing interests come into conflict, and one party is willing to use violence, that one wins. End of story. It's the lowest common denominator of the universe.
>>711787317
As someone who is pretty much just a dedicated bottom: I get off on guys using my ass for their pleasure. You learn to like getting fucked if you're just a tiny bit masochist.
>>711797618
With the exception of the various non-violent protesters that got civil rights for African-Americans, the passive resistance of the Indians under Ghandi that got independence for India, the various non-violent movements throughout history that were able to enact change. And what of the groups willing to use violence? Did the Anarchists achieve their goals? Did the Klan? Did the Nazis or the Imperial Japanese?
>>711797618
> If two parties with differing interests come into conflict, and one party is willing to use violence, that one wins.
The British occupying India were willing and did use violence against Gandhi and his supporters yet his endeavor was instrumental in them withdrawing their presence.
>>711797841
African american civil rights protestors were bolstered by the federal government's willingness to muster massive force in their defense. I mean, what would you call johnson ordering the national guard to selma?
Indian independence, conversely, succeeded because the british were no longer willing to use violence.
>>711797922
See above.
>>711788647
anon........moar
The British were not willing to use violence because they were not only not achieving their goal, but were also being pressured by the international community. Ghandi completely achieved his goal without firing a gun or raising a hand in anger. The American Government did it for the exact same reason. You're acting as if they did these things out of the kindness of their hearts, not because of the overwhelming pressure from the community to treat the non-violent protestors with the kindness and respect that they deserved. Furthermore, even if Johnson didn't order troops to provide security, the Civil Rights Movement would have achieved their goal. The Klan wasn't capable of stopping the movement once it started. You are talking about people who, though are not willing to use violence to achieve their goals, were willing to give their lives for it, and no matter how hard you try, you cannot kill the idea. Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol Pot, none of them were able to stop the spread of ideas. You are an idiot if you think otherwise.
Violence begets violence, as Dr. King once stated.
>>711797966
The federal government were not the participating party- The clash of interests was between the civil rights protestors and a select facet of the population who were willing to use violence.
And if the British were no longer willing to use violence that means there is a trumping power in the opposing side not doing so- If public opinion and perception were not a thing you might be on to something, but physical confrontation cannot destroy an idea. The British would literally have to kill every single Indian who sympathized with Gandhi's goals and even then history tends to inspire the next generation. I'm all for pragmatism when push comes to shove and backs meet walls but what you're claiming is asinine. To be contemporary, the "notmypresident" types out rioting are willing to use violence, but they haven't done anything for their goals. There's the BLM protestors burning shit down but I'd say that only galvanized the public to elect a president they pointedly opposed. You're talking crap.
Everything you're talking about apropos India happens under the auspices of international force conglomerates, it's just abstracted enough that it doesn't feel like force is relevant to you. It still underpins every interaction.
>Furthermore, even if Johnson didn't order troops to provide security, the Civil Rights Movement would have achieved their goal
Absolutely false. American states and municipalities are actually autonomous enough to ignore random shit that the rest of the country wants in the absence of severe repudiations like the strategic application of military force. The greater force of the federal government relative to southern states is an inseparable part of the accomplishments of civil rights.
Also, Stalin was pretty damn successful in his life time, Maoist China is still a superpower today, and Hitler LOST A WAR, which proves my point.
>>711798543
>The federal government were not the participating party
They're a participating party if their army shows up to enforce the position of one side or the other.
Poorly directed violence as with the BLM, the trump protestors, etc, is irrelevant since they're mostly smashing their own neighborhoods, meaning their political opponents are profoundly unaffected by the whole process.
It's true that physical confrontation can't destroy an idea, but it's also true that sufficient martial force can make an idea absolutely irrelevant. Gandhi was smart enough to realize that the British thought better of themselves.
Or as Christ said in the Sermon on the Mount:
Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also.
And whosoever shall compel thee to go a mile, go with him twain.
Give to him that asketh thee, and from him that would borrow of thee turn not thou away.
Jesus cheats since he can come back to life, the rest of us aren't so lucky. I've got to go, good talk lads.
I can't come up with an idea that's been made absolutely irrelevant- Even ones that are considered outright evil and have state mandates against them. Nazism has been run into the ground since its inception and even so much as mentioning them in Germany gets the government to come set your house fire but there's still Nazi movements in Germany. "Irrelevant" is real strange to qualify since it is a relative term insofar as who the idea is "relevant" to or what it is relevant to. I would also say it doesn't matter if the British "thought better," exploitation of the opposition's morality through non-violent means demonstrates that a willingness to use violence doesn't guarantee success and can even work against your own ends.
Congratulations on literally not making a point. No, England wasn't pressured through the threat of invasion, other nations saw Ghandi's movement and pressured the British through the economy, not by means of the military. Ergo, Ghandi successfully gained Indian independence via non-violent passive resistance. The Federal Government did not participate in the movement, they were only there to preserve law and order. They protected the civil rights workers as much as they protected the whites of the towns and cities. Furthermore on the issue of American Civil Rights, the movement would have been successful despite the Federal Government's involvement specifically because they were changing the hearts of the current generation as well as influencing directly the younger generation. Stalin was by no means successful, Maoist China wasn't a superpower, China is, and China is by no means Maoist anymore. Hitler was alive at some point, no? During his life he was wholly unsuccessful in stopping the spread of the idea of resistance towards the Nazis. There were constantly people smuggling banned books, printing news papers secretly that spoke out in protest of the Nazis, distributed materials that were counter to the prevailing Nazi ideology, and hid Jews. Hitler wasn't successful in his life, Stalin wasn't, Mao wasn't, nobody is. Ideas can't be stopped, you can't erase history, the Egyptians came the closest to being able to, but even they failed.
That was directed at Subjectivefag, not you, Clint. But you probably already knew that.
Also, way to dismiss The Sermon on the Mount outright instead of addressing it directly, Subjectivefag.
Yeah I gathered as much. I was largely airing my thoughts to no one in particular, seemed like it would be a waste to just drop it after had most of it typed up.
>>711799566
'lo there
>>711799711
I just woke up a bit ago so I'm out of it.
Sup with you, Dallas?
>>711799744
Took a break from some technical reading before the rest of my obligations today come around. So not much.
>>711799847
Sounds gay as shit.
I might pass out for an hour.
>>711799902
You know me, gay is my way.
>>711799970
i want to buy nekomimi gear and clothes (headphones or a helmet) but idk where from help me /fur/
I want to get a cactus just to put googly eyes on it.
>>711800364
i had a cactus that i found in a trash can
i had it 2 years then i threw it out
>>711800520
Must have been a real bastard to be thrown in the trash twice.
>>711799970
do the ears ventilate the helmet, or are they just stuck on there?
Though personally, I love the trash. I am always eating from the trash can all the time. The name of the trash can is ideology. The material force of ideology makes me not see what I am effectively eating.
