Fluffy Abuse. New one.
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Fluffy Abuse. New one.
>>>696093499
Nice, a new thread already.
>>696094726
>>696094879
>>696095015
>>696095198
I forgot to say this is unfinished too unfortunately.
>>696095412
>>696095412
They always are, it seems like.
>>696095601
Both are unfinished
>>696095624
Dunnnnnnnn
Dunnnnnnnn
Dunnnnnnnn.....
Dun Duuuuuuuuun!!!
>>696095786
>>696095624
Yeah, it's quite unfortunate.
>>696096061
>>696096308
>>696096385
>>696096385
>>696096501
Spoiler banco its a bitch
>>696096501
>>696096591
He's a smarty; what do you expect?
>>696097206
>>696097403
>>696096950
What is this referencing? Maze Runner?
>>696097594
>>696097634
I think so.
>>696098082
>>696098464
End
>>696098464
damn bro, i almost feel bad for that thing
>>696094580
never going to be finished.
>>696098634
> no epic fight between knight fluffy and fluffburd
Fluffy runner is by far the best fluffy comic i have read
Come on faggots lesgo
Is thread rip
>>696101682
Newfag here, is the point of these thread amusement, sadism, or sexual pleasure?
>>696102249
Yes
>>696102395
Whoops, wrong image
>>696102334
So, all three?
Fluffy threads are the only reason i come to /b/
>>696102623
To each their own
>>696102623
Whatever helps you sleep afterwards, really. Some people do genuinely seem to get off to these in more ways than one.
I just enjoy watching the entitled little shits get some justice. I skip over roughly half the content because I've read it before, or I'm just not enjoying it.
But when a Smarty fucks up and gets his testicles removed with a sanding belt, fuck the hell yes, it's satisfying to watch.
>>696101033(check'd)
oy vey
>>696103497
>>696102623
Consider, if you will, that you're already familiar with this genre. Possibly, you even enjoy it.
Consider for a moment, the following:
>Young, stupid, sexually charged hedonists
>Imminent violence at the hands of an unknown antagonist
>Usually does not have a happy ending
>Bit o' the old ultraviolence
Slasher films.
These stories mostly are similar to the plots within, or surrounding the main part, of slasher films. Halloween, Friday the 13th, Scream, Saw, Nightmare on Elm Street, Hostel. These films have a cult following, which, considering the basic premise, one could be surprised that they made it past their first movie, let alone entire generations of movies.
Fluffy abuse basically follows the same damn model.
Watching people die has gotten boring over the years, but semi intelligent mlp parodies being killed? Now that's fun
>>696103943
>>696104417
That's the added bonus. Not only can most fluffies be instantly hated, but we all had that seed planted when /b/ fucking _drowned_ under MLP threads.
And I'm sure we all remember "Chickun tread" popping up every 5 seconds.
>>696102249
Hi, I'm the president of fluffybooru.org and I'd be happy to answer your question!
We draw MLP pictures and beat our dicks off to them.
>>696103943
You get it, fam.
I never understood why normies are so disgusted by the killing of an animal when they love such gore films. I actually liked the first saw since it had a good plot, the rest were shit.
>>696104902
I don't mind humans or fictional animals getting killed. They most likely deserve it. I just hate animal gore, so I stay away from it. I don't knock the people who are fans of gore or liking that kind of stuff though.
>>696104902
Well, I only watched Saw and Saw II. I saw an immediate tone shift, it felt like a change to a reality t.v. meets slasher film.
Also, people are huge fucking hypocrites in this regard. Ask anyone to explain why a Cow is cool to eat, but a Dog is wrong, and you'll see pretty flimsy rationale come into play fairly quickly.
>>696105311
Checked first off. Second, Cows are dumb as shit. Cattle have been used for food for as long as humans started to settle down. Dogs are actually for something other than food. Like hunting for example. That's why I don't eat dog. Again, not knocking the chinese for doing it though. I just think it's stupid to kill something of higher intelligence for food.
>>696104841
I hated that damn chickun with a fucking passion
>>696105274
I don't care if that's the kind of movies people like to watch. I love obviously love these threads. I just think it's stupid how they make an evening out of watching people get chopped while they turn their noses at the fact of executing household pests.
>>696105311
>I saw an immediate tone shift
Their certainly was.
The second was bad, but the third was awful.
I know what you mean.
I personally don't care what the meat is if it isn't endangered and the animal was treated well during its life.
>>696105973
you and me both, /b/ro.
I just got into this shit today, /b/. I always ignored these threads whenever I was on this board, but now I'm fucking itching for more.
Is there something wrong with me for taking pleasure in seeing these little bastards be tormented and killed?
Was feeling like shit, this thread helped a lot not gonna lie
>>696105870
You'd be surprised, Cows are actually both intelligent, and capable of empathy. Do a little research. You're lead to believe they're dumb as mud so you don't feel bad for eating them. You believe they're essentially just meat grown on grass, right?
>>696105870
Do you eat pig?
>>696106254
Not at all. It's the most fucking awesome thing to read when mad.
>>696105311
yeah, the though of water kills them . reproduction officially cannot sustain them.
>>696106346
>>696106285
Yes I eat pig. They can be intelligent creatures at times, and useful. Cows though, don't do much for us. They can't hunt, gather, or do anything except eat, shit, sleep, and mate. And if anything, they're responsible for a high amount of methane emissions killing plant life, and destroying ozone. I can watch a cow get shot in the face no problem. I can do the same with a dog if it's a clean kill, and it needed to be done.
>>696106862
Also, I'll eat any animal that's edible. I just don't like watching them get killed. Ignorance is bliss at times.
>>696106862
Cows are only a problem because we're raising them for food. Wild herds never got as numerous as the agriculture industry provides.
Pigs have actually shown to have a higher intelligence than any species of dog, capable of understanding at least modestly abstract concepts.
>>696106862
Just an FYI, I'm not trying to turn you off of meat, but... there's a lot of smoke screening most people don't even notice.
![fargo liek to play favorite].png](https://i.imgur.com/cMhMUkk.png "fargo liek to play favorite].png")
>>696106254
You know the exact moment you got hooked, don't you?
>>696107363
>>696107510
True. And I fucking love meat. Nothing will stop me from loving it. Hell, I'm going out in the fall to get myself some dear. You know, most assholes on /b/ just make nonsensical arguments against my claims, but you're not an ass. You have presented some good claims here, while being civil. Nice job man.
>>696105311
its just the idea of it.
Theres cow, chicken, pig, and other cattle available for eating. these animals are the best choice since the meat is readily available in any market.
But instead of that, you decide to eat some stray dog. I could understand eating a dog if you were starving and had no other choice, but it just seems sickening otherwise, regardless of the fact of slaughterhouses and how they are operated.
also beef and chicken are the most logical since we also need cows for milk (to make various dairy products) and chicken for eggs, which have important nutrients that our body needs.
either way it doesn't really matter in the end, meat is meat, food is food when starving.
>>696107510
>you will never do this to a fluffy
Why even live
>>696108077
I do try. This sort of thing actually made me go vegetarian, and I've stuck with it since I was a kid.
Honestly, I can respect anyone who can stick to their guns. You wanna eat meat, more power to you.
Quite honestly, I'd rather support hunting wild animals over the practices of the agriculture industries.
>>696106254
It gives me a god complex
Theyre created creatures who look up to us mummas and daddehs for love, protection and shelter
All that innocent and trust betrayed and crushed with zero consequences
>>696108241
Actually, you're not reliant on any dairy produce to survive. There's actually a good chance that you're addicted, however. Cows produce an addictive chemical in their milk to make sure their young won't wander far from their mothers.
Milk is actually disturbingly unnatural as an industry, when you stop and think about it. Again, I'm not trying to put anyone off, but look into the full process required to keep a cow producing milk.
Eggs are... well, you could liken eggs to a woman's period. It's simply material that had the potential for life, since discarded. Don't get me wrong, eggs are fucking delicious, but.. Well, I have no control over what the chickens laying them get to eat, so, I'm looking at cutting dairy out of my diet.
If you're going to make a decision on any matter, make sure it's an informed one. You owe it to yourself.
Also, more fluff abuse.
>>696108493
The problem is people hunt them for sport rather than meat. If everyone ate the 12-point buck they get in the Winter, I wouldn't have a problem with it.
You could say that the Native Americans hunted then for thousands of years and they never went extinct, but they didn't hunt them on the same scale and they used all the parts of the animal. (Fur for clothes, bones for tools, meat for food, etc.)
>>696108254
I like the idea of getting a smarty good and fucked up
>>696108254
No I would. Those genetically modified freaks have no right to exist on the grounds of the evolutionary playing field. Everything has a right to live because it has survived literally billions of years of evolution. That's what earns respect in my book. But a completely (newly created animal like fluffies) modified animal has no respect from the start. If it can survive long enough to reproduce and add on to local ecosystems, it's a normal animal now. But these things destroy crops, cause sickness (from their shit spreading in cities), act like shit heads, and destroy ecosystems. This makes me hate something so much you cannot believe it. If a fluffy can survive in the wilderness without fucking up the ecosystem and acting like a shithead, it's okay in my book. But when a smarty douche comes in, shits all over the place and demands my time and stuff, that little asshole will get the fucking sander to the balls. P.S. This is >>696108077
Here's where I differ from what seems like 95% of people into this shit: I'm not a huge fan of abuse comics. I love a good abuse story, though. I'm not sure why; maybe it's because comics are typically shorter (or get canceled before completion) and don't leave me as satisfied. Especially one-off, single panel affairs.
Now, wierdbox, on the other hand...
>>696109295
Yeah, that's part of the problem, really. I can't offer a better solution. So, I don't go trying to convert. I'll share my viewpoints, my research, but.. Everyone has their own ability to choose. I've made my choice, and I'm happy to stick with it.
>>696109295
I use all the animal I can carry. An elk weighs too much to drag, so I take some, and leave the rest for the natural wildlife to feed on its carcass. The cycle continues, I have 60-150lbs of shit to carry and use, and the meat lasts for months.
>>696109366
No you won't. They aren't real. That's what I'm lamenting. You will never abuse a fluffy for the sheer fun of it. Why even live?
>>696109735
I'm saying if they did. Why live? To help expand the fragile flame of life in this universe.
>>696109143
For what purpose?
>>696109699
That's good. I only hunt Turkey myself. But I've helped my buddy with quartering and hauling White Tailed Deer. I give the feathers to my artsy friends and they make shit out of it. I use a small caliber rifle, so with a bit of mixing and matching from a bunch of different skeletons to account for the bones destroyed by the bullet, I've made two full Skeletons that I sold online. I was working on a third, but my woodshed god molotov'd by some asshole. B (
>>696110156
Eating, most likely
>>696110516
But then why wast the time amputating the legs if their going to be racked anyway?
>>696109237
Sauce on a dairy addiction study?
>>696110769
Because we are assholes.
>>696110445
That pic
My fucking sides
>>696110445
Nice. Any fat that I find on the animal is used to make crude Bio-Fuel for whatever.
>>696110769
Because they aren't at time management like you anon~~~
>>696111015
>>696110156
>>696110516
According to the artist, it's for collecting their shit to make into fertilizer.
>>696111169
>>696111299
>>696111502
>>696111502
These ones are good. 1/5
If you're lurking, contribute.
>>696112148
>>696112236
As far as I know this one is still unfinished.
This is some SAW shit here. This concept wouldn't make a bad spin-off movie or story. With humans of course. The normies won't pay tobsee horses abused like this.
>But I would
Bump
>>696110857
http://www.zmescience.com/other/science-abc/dairy-addiction-real/
I've not read up on the effects on human biology, but it seems possible. Actually going to read now, this was the first artivle I found on the matter.
>>696113137
hmm, Apparently not. interesting to know, though
>>696112808
holy shit these are fucking gold.
>>696094181
Fuck, why is this still a thing?
>>696113709
What artist/series is this?
Does anyone have the 3 info graphs of the fluffy family as it goes on?
>>696114110
>>696114671
holy fuck
A U T I S M
U
T
I
S
M
>>69611467one
Seriously? I see this shit everywhere else, why here? No, I don't count this as a direct response but fuck you you fucking fuck. Those posts are garbage and you deserve to die in a pile of your own shit after being skull fucked by horse cocks.
>>696114671
And now this cancer's spread to here. Is nothing sacred?
>>696116357
Learn the rules
Best thing to do is not reply and let it die but there will always be people that reply.
>>696114671
At least you properly made it fluffy
>>696114671
FUUUUUUUUCK YOOOOOUU
they need your help
>>696114671
gave me a mild chuckle
>>696117400
You do. Format c:
>>696107529
post original?
>>696119276
You might as well to keep thread alive but it is nearing image limit
>>696119492
It's not that near yet.
>>696114671
Thats a new one
>>696121833
>>696119326
>>696118024
>>696117881
>>696117636
>>696117542
>>696117470
>>696115433
This is some good weirdbox, fampai.
>>696122363
Just trying to keep the thread alive and on topic.
>>696122725
Well, good on you!
I'm afraid I'm mostly out of pics, aside from a bit of hugbox, myself.
>>696122755
nice
>>696123087
Nothing wrong with hugbox. Variety is the spice of fluffies.
>>696123673
forgot pic
I love the ones where the fluffy is especially deserving of abuse.
>>696124070
You know that if a little shitrat called you a cunt, it's suffering would be far beyond legendary. It would beg for death before the end.
>>696124539
>implying there would be an end
i would make it suffer for months if any of them tried to call me a cunt.
>>696107529
Does anyone like flugbys? I get they're supposed to be parody, but just plainly repeating the fluffy tropes (or the major events of one story in this case) have never been funny to me. Anyone here enjoy them, and if so, why?
>>696125213
I think they're funny
>>696124070
>>696125148
Post the rest
>>696125213
>flugbys
I admit the guy's good at summing up a story, but the fact remains that his art is intentionally crap.
>>696125213
I like them because they are so bizarre. Their erudition, rationality and self-awareness are entertainingly surreal.
>>696098082
They killed literally the best character. Fuck.
Anyone got the rest of that immortal fluffy comic from the last thread? Last I saw, he crushed it.
>>696099276
yeah, i never understood what exactly these things were. Someone wanna explain what they are and what they do?
>>696114145
Dust collector. Great artist.
>>696125333
>>696125678
Thanks for explaining, guys.
1/3
>>696127793
2/3
>>696127863
3/3
>>696122725
Can someone tell me what these greyscale images are about?
Can someone explain Jellenheimers to me? I never understood what they are
>>696128022
Some people like drawing weird shit.
>>696128108
part of the horror / weird stuff.. like a boogeyman for fluffies.
In all seriousness would you own a fluffy? I can see them being super popular with the elderly.
>>696128022
Atmosphere. And also - I am just not very fond of colour, I guess (though I do occasionally use it, pic related).
>>696128446
do you have any good jellenheimer comics to recommend?
>>696128741
>>696128810
>>696128729
i personally dislike the character and know of no comic with it in it. everything ive seen is single frame
>>696128682
of course. i have a cat i own so it would be like owning a second pet.
>>696097634
>>696097941
very very loosely the first one, also it was missing page one i believe, which might have explained
>>696128446
I get that, but why make them about fluffies?
I thought there was some joke that I wasn't getting.
Also, what are Jellenheimers?
>>696128182
I get that, but why make them about fluffies?
I thought there was some joke that I wasn't getting.
>>696129282
>>696128182
I also really love that art style for foals, do you have anymore?
>>696129072
Page one was on the last thread before image limit
>>696128701
Atmosphere of what?
If you're aiming for a spoopy feel then it works well, but how does that mesh with the the "wuv and rainbow" world of fluffies?
>>696129282
there's no "joke" its like a ghost story for fluffies. i guess the joke is that a story a fluffy would tell would be scary or funny to anyone other than another fluffy.
>>696125213
The sharpness of the parody amuses me. Especially the one where the foal says "charp."
>>696126514
The jellenheimer. Some kind of fluffy mutation. They are ... beyond. You never see a jellenheimer DO anything except exist with an eerie smile. It never eats or sleeps. It just smiles.
Perhaps fluffies are terrified of them for a reason.
>>696128986
I think I would enjoy having a second pet that talks to you and unconditionally loves you. It'll be like having a child that never grows up and never hits that annoying rebellious teenage stage.
>>696129766
Oh, the images seem so fractured that I didn't knew there was supposed to be a story.
>>696129758
Good point. But I don't think you need colour for hugbox or comfy pics. And, after all, the world of fluffies is a many-faceted place. I just tend to stick to creepybox more than anything else.
i have an idea for a fluffy that i really want to see somebody make
1 out of every 10 million or so fluffies, theres a floating fluffy with an equivalent of a 200 human IQ, who can explode people with his mind and shit.
these fluffies are extremely dangerous, except for the fact that they can just be swatted out of the air and smacked against the ground
>>696130202
>annoying rebellious teenage stage
They don't do that if you raise them correctly, like a fluffy.
>>696131204
There already was a mind-exploding fluffy, but it was a genetically-engineered satyr, I believe. Drawn by one of the Russians. The Russian hugboxer, I think, though I might be wrong.
>>696131204
kinda wanna do something with this, actually.
expect it someday.
>>696132484
cool man. i just think it would be great to see a fluffy turn the tables on humans.
and then get fuckin bitch slapped with a bat at the end of course.
does anyone else prefer it when fluffies are like pig sized instead of being small
>>696132950
dude, pig-sized fluffies are the best. i can't imagine a fluffy that could be smaller than a cat or dog (besides micro-fluffies, of course).
>>696103497
kek
>>696114671
Really....
>>696103497
lol
