I got a few webms I'll post in a sec, finishing the last of this stuff
I've got a mix of tots and regular lolis with diapers, I'll try to find more of the latter (though in the other thread I got requests for more tots, so I'm finishing that up first)
I have fewer webms than I thought. And half of the ones I have are ones that have sound- still don't understand why /b/ doesn't accept them
Yeah thats all the tots I got. I might repost some of the ones from the previous thread just to appease the diaper request
Does anyone know where you can get one of these with a full body/arms/legs/head? I bought a baby doll, cut it open and put a fleshlight in it, but it's just not the same.
My guess would be they would try to avoid making a fully sex baby doll as it would quickly gain unwanted attention from the Western corporate media. I think they're trying to upkeep some kind of moderate form of sexual fulfilment without full blown pedo.
Just a guess.
Here is a whole class
You're just splitting hairs. One shade degree of gray from gray is still gray.
Although it's true that they are certainly more related than they are not, it's not really the same.
Taste and preference are a fine line for everyone. If one's not willing to differentiate a couple years difference, then there'd be no difference between the preferences of little girls to teenage girls, and teenage girls to early adults.
Also, toddler is gross.
I'd like to request some Louise
Taking requests either.
you're sick fucks and i wish i could personally kill each and every one of you
what would your parents think?
die motherfuckers, DIE
>Taste and preference are a fine line for everyone.
Except you're condemning a line that's not much different from yours. You're basically doing the exact same thing normies, moralfags, and SJW's, except for you it's just a slight degree off from yours while sitting high and righteous against something that neighbors your line. I don't expect you to understand this, but don't pretend you're better or superior because your taste and preference doesn't agree with ours when its dancing on the bordering line of difference.
>you're sick fucks and i wish i could personally kill each and every one of you
kek I'd like to see you try faggot.
>what would your parents think?
honestly I don't really give a fuck. Their opinion of me isn't going to change what I like and dislike. Also they wouldn't give a shit since I haven't and wouldn't hurt a child.
i guess ill post some
Isn't it ridiculous that just drawing a loli can put you into jail?
I mean, by the same reasoning, every violent movie or book may do the same as well.
Unless you like to be arbitrary at making laws.
You're misunderstanding one thing;
>while sitting high and righteous against something that neighbors your line
There are two angles to tackle this that come to mind rather quickly
1) A great majority of people are repulsed by others' preference, and
2) Tolerance goes a long way.
As far as the former goes, I have a strong preference for the apparent age-range / body-range of a girl between the ages of 11-14. There's, of course, always exceptions and some degree of variance, but that's where I'd define my preference. I am rather tolerant to the people who are into [apparent] pre-teens, teens, and young adults, but find anything above and below to be moderately reprehensible.
Of course, people who are "normal" find anything younger, and possibly older to be reprehensible all the same.
As far as the latter is concerned, a good portion of lolicons have always been tolerant of the toddlercons because we usually do get lumped together. Any toddlercon and any lolicon would always draw the distinction between them, but people on the outside (or people who have preference for both) don't.
Also, I was being, for the most part, facetious in my last line. Although I do think it's gross, I don't really care if it shows up in these threads.
I could touch on how teens border on the line of "Adults" (18 in the USA), and how... etc. It's really arbitrary distinctions, but there are definite distinctions between toddlers and children, children and teens, and teens and adults. [All apparent, of course]
Yeah, that's why I said "arbitrary"
We are talking about fiction. Wth, even there is and was the same conservative worry about videogames, when people that never ever touched a computer though that videogames could make you violent, but at the same time, teaching a child to use an assault rifle didn't.
>you're sick fucks and i wish i could personally kill each and every one of you
That's some moral compass you have.
>what would your parents think?
Does that question come to mind to every single choices you make or any and every given desire you have?
Wanting to personally kill people you don't agree with on this thread, and you don't see the irony in calling people this?
>die motherfuckers, DIE
In time, sure. We are mortal after all.
>itt: fucking faggots falling for spiderfaggots bait
There's more difference and distinction between anime drawings of any given human and any actual human. You on the other hand have shown actual interest in humans which is now distancing the difference between us, and society has a general consensus of being repulsed by your preference. How are you unable to understand us while being ridiculed by the rest of society for your preferences?
Tolerance is only as far or close as you allow it to be and the same can be said for open-mindedness. Why are you carrying a personal bias instead of making an effort to have some balance and fairness to us? You understand how ostracized your likes are, why can't you make an effort to let us enjoy our thread without having to point out a splitting hair difference?
I hope you really don't care what we like to lump in perhaps your threads. It might actually lead to having a more peaceful threads without battling people with a degree of different preferences.
She doesn't look like she's enjoying it. This is clearly abusive and inducing psychological trauma to the victim while enabling your desire for a rape culture. Please stop 4chan.
I'm with you fam, and don't leave out how feminists are making efforts to criminalize porn because it promotes a "rape culture" and I'm fairly certain they're using the word culture out of context. They make claims that watching porn long enough will make a man want to reach for having the real thing, by any means necessary, including force.
But yet it's fine for children to watch any and every violent movies they want, but heaven forbid if that kid sees a boob. It's just not appropriate and he'll lead to raping girls in his adulthood.
Seriously, fuck society.
I knew the first point you made would be brought up because I made a few assumptions in our argument; that we are specifically talking about the art/anime-style medium. I hinted at this assumption by using the word "apparent." I am speaking specifically about this medium, and not of real humans.
Also, I see where our argument here takes its root. The original post this began with was some anon with:
>what the fuck. this is toddler not loli, fuck outta here. disgusting
It is a post that contains both fact (toddler != loli) and 4chan-style opinions (that toddler is disgusting).
I'd like to mention at this point that that was not my post. I merely replied to yours.
>You're just splitting hairs. One shade degree of gray from gray is still gray.
It's not splitting hairs though, because there's a definite distinction between toddler and loli, and both toddlercons and lolicons respect that.
The rest kind of just spiraled downward. I think you may believe I'm being hostile towards your preference.
The only thing I'm arguing is that there's a distinct difference; toddler is not loli (as the OP erroneously implied).
My "toddler is gross" bit was no more than a cheeky afterthought (directly influenced by assumed attitudes and meme-like comments brought about by this exact ordeal multiple times in the past).
No one's criticizing you for liking toddlercon.
Well, at least I'm not.
Worst thing that could happen is they saying "ok, let's go full retard. SHUT DOWN EVERYTHING"
But again, that could be applied even to religious books, political books, feminist books. Everything is everything, for fucks sake.
Then, just for comedy, and psycho watches one animal killing another one and thinks "Hey, humans are animals, I can kill humans too". Next that happens is everybody having their eyes plucked out
You're definitely leading to a road of rape and it's clear that you have no moral compass. Please stop looking at this as you're perpetuating a male gender of degenerates.
You don't understand that you're enabling men to a slippery-slope of callousness and apathy to wymen in a patriarchal dystopia of misogyny. This will lead to the next step of abusing and inflicting trauma to wymon and perhaps children for your sexual desires, you chauvinist.
All this whining will just produce more loli threads.
They're still better than your furfaggotry/trap/horsefucking shit.
Also half the reason I like lolis is because cunts like you hate them.
Good. I don't care for real toddlers. At least not sexually. And going back to the roots gives adds another point that saying "fuck outta here" try to strike both offense, intolerance, and a demand others leave.
Even with a distinction between tolddlercons and lolicons, there have been posts that grey between the two. I don't have any examples to post as I can't be bothered to find an unorganized folder of loli and toddler collected by years.
And what you initially said felt hostile even if you didn't intend. Because "fuck outta here" and "disgusting" have elements of hostility in structuring a point. I appreciate that you're not criticizing me for liking what I like, it's usually people who try to distance themselves from liking toddler comes with an extreme intolerance and judgement from them, I felt like it was spiraling to this reoccurring event, you'll have to forgive me if I felt this way as I'm constantly having to defend what I like, especially when I'm not hurting anyone. Or don't intend to.
There's no point in defending the shit you like. You don't have to prove yourself to anyone, especially not on 4chan.
This thread does lack loli though.
No, I'm not. I'm creating a society of supporting equality, especially gender equality, and making progress of educating males into being more understanding of their rape desires. You can't stop progress, especially in our patriarchal society that will lead to tolerance instead of your bigoted chauvinist propaganda you men who have clearly populated the fields of science, statistical data, psychology, and neuroscience. Because those are boys clubs who try to distort the truth that all men have urges to repress womyn. You would never understand, because you're too narrow minded to allow yourself to be challenged by accurate ideas that challenge your own. Stay mad.
Lol, same shit again, feminist trying to look like equalists yet they never made campaigns supporting men abused by women.
As a real equalist, I don't support macho attitudes because I despise them, but also don't like to have less rights than women because if not I'm oppresing them.
Anyway, if I ever have a rape fantasy I'll try to remember you in particular as my fantasy object.
You clearly posted this because your thought and ideas are lackluster and don't hold any real power against me. And while I may be from tumblr, I'm just happy I can make valid points without having to be physically attacked by you men when you're losing ground. That's what all males do, and that's why the internet is a great place for feminism to progress society into giving us the freedoms you owe us, and it's long overdue.
That's because it almost never happens. And even your male dominated corporate media stretches the truth or makes shit up against wymen because they fear being subjected to equality. You've been indoctrinated that supporting a patriarchal society is equality and you're too brainwashed to open your eyes to the truth. This thread is disgusting and you all should feel ashamed of yourselves.
>might be illegal
Except it's not you ragless shitstain loser.
>fuck off weirdo some day you will rape and kill a child
I don't like children, never have. If anything, you're going to inflict harm if not kill another person for believing in their right to love whoever they choose.
Name-calling. When you've lost any valid points to support your bigotry.
Lol, male dominated media. hahahah
Seriously, when I'm checking the news, it's hard to find the amount of cases of men being abused, but there are if you look for pages that link to different newspaper's articles in which you can see real news about men being abused.
Near the end of 2015 it was easy to see in tv news the total amount of reported cases of women abused or killed by men, but nobody cared even the least to count the cases those websites were offering for free with links to real newspaper articles.
And from now on I'll stop feeding the troll here. We'll meet in the next internet debate though.
Though I know I won't get a straight answer, I'm genuinely curious if you actually believe all the things you are posting. I can't imagine someone would take shitposting to this extreme, but I could be wrong.
Assuming you do believe the things you are posting, why here, of all places? Sexually-frustrated, whale-tier tumblrites getting angry and sexually-frustrated, whale-tier 4channers? And in a loli thread, of all places?
At least you're better than spider posters.
Also, does anyone have this image in higher rez?
>feminazis still getting mad at loli threads
>it will just make it more satisfying to post lolis
Thanks for wasting your time to make us happier, cunts.
Have you seen that topnotch doujin of her on the panda?
Absolutely fantastic. This page is top-tier.
You haven't left when you said you were, it's not likely you're going to leave now. The only thing you can do is pretend to laugh when you're being challenged and your arguments are easily defeated, and by a girl. Who would've thought? Not you.
You honestly believe the pages that link to different newpaper's articles isn't more male propaganda, you're more naive then estimated.
As per 2015, the amount of news reports of wymen being abused or killed was because feminist, like me, who pressured the media to post the truth for a change, and yet it still doesn't represent the real amount of challenges and oppression wymen face every day. Who would've thought? Again, not you.
I'll be more than happy to debate you when you actually have anything valid to say instead of calling me a troll with and carrying a sense of irony that if really was a troll, you wouldn't be responding to me. The fact that you are coincide the phrase "actions speak louder than words" and your actions to respond reaffirm that. Go ahead and leave because you know have nothing valid to say, never did, and never will.
Feminist's don't really want equality, they want superiority. That's ok though, because nature put the ultimate check on your radical, lunatic desires. You cannot survive without us, males, just as we can't survive without you, females. One goes extinct without the other.
Hello there. I don't think I know you.
I love the fact how she saw the thread and thaught:
> I WILL TALK SOME SENSE INTO THESE PEOPLE
Belive me Spiderman tryed, kawaii tank guy tried, chinese solider guy tryed, fuck even Gary oak tryed and all failed misserably
>You honestly believe the pages that link to different newpaper's articles isn't more male propaganda, you're more naive then estimated.
Oh, that's convenient. You can just dismiss any facts you don't like as "male propaganda" so that you don't actually have to acknowledge or accept anything that doesn't conform to your narrow, flawed worldview.
You can't even form a question right much less a complete thought. And if you didn't care, you wouldn't respond and I'd expect no less from someone completely and utterly asinine as you. I do have better things to do, like collaborate with my sisters on what we're going to do to your misogynistic website composed of autistic neckbeards who literally have nothing but post sexualized content since our society has slowed your kind down from raping. And with that, I can assess you hold no actual power over me or any other forms of authority in society, and that's because there's probably a good reason for it.
Hi, I don't know you either, nice to meet you. How are you?
>bless the pass
I am fine, but fixing to sleep.
I imagine you're not only active on loli threads.
You discord or something?
>giving japmoot jewgolds
Yee I am, I don't use it much tho. Used to be here all the time but then life happened
>guess you win this time
Which other lolicons do you know?
Most of the ones I know don't really bother with threads anymore.
This is my first time on one in months.
I can dismiss corporate media since it's owned and produced by men, for men, and keep the majority of wymen further distorted and blind to the truth. The reason you're here is because you need a temporary distraction from raping wymen. And most "academic research" is a males club that upkeeps a distortion from the truth, when in fact, to progress further, needs to be dismissed entirely in the name of academic justice.
It's sad that men are so brainwashed and unwilling to be convince to arguments that challenge their narrow minded and bigoted views. You might actually have a point, I'll give you that.
You wouldn't know any of this because I can tell you're not a feminist, never attended any feminist conferences, never studies wymens studies, and lack the capacity to comprehend anything that doesn't fit your outlandish views of an inherently evil world of putting profits before equality. It won't be long until the few wymen who are allowed in STEM fields will find a way to allow use to live our lives without you, create eggs without you, and when we no longer need you to populate this planet, it will lead to your inevitable demise.
Pee is a great guy.
I know Nano and Rumia a bit, but not that well.
I talk to dicks semi-daily. I'm the one who brought him into namefagging.
Well, I suppose I'll see you around. I may occasionally join on discord whenever sin invites me to it. I'm off to bed.
>It won't be long until the few wymen who are allowed in STEM fields
Most of the women I know in my STEM classes aren't juvenile enough to subscribe to pseudo-feminist agendas.
But that's neither here nor there.
>Reminder not to feed the trolls
>Most of the women I know in my STEM classes aren't juvenile enough to subscribe to pseudo-feminist agendas.
Doesn't surprise me. But you'll never actually know that for a fact since you can't read the mind of womyn. Females as a whole are better at lying, keeping secrets, and hiding their agendas from you chauvinists. This was probably a biological necessity to survive in an inherently patriarchal planet.
>Reminder not to feed the trolls
That's why you're here replying to me right? Thought so.
>You wouldn't know any of this because I can tell you're not a feminist, never attended any feminist conferences, never studies wymens studies, and lack the capacity to comprehend anything that doesn't fit your outlandish views of an inherently evil world of putting profits before equality. It won't be long until the few wymen who are allowed in STEM fields will find a way to allow use to live our lives without you, create eggs without you, and when we no longer need you to populate this planet, it will lead to your inevitable demise.
Nah, you slutty cum dumpsters ( well, not you personally, my guess is that you've never been fucked in your entire life ) would miss the dick too much to do that.
It's over anon, I already confessed I was a shitposting troll. See >>680358863
I'm just tired and done trolling and shitposting, so I thought you should know. Good insult though!
Oh I read a lot of stupid shit feminist say, because I'm subscribe to anti-feminism on FB, TY, and /b/. I read some news debunking feminism, and all I did was regurgitate all the bullshit I learned from what feminists say.
It was pretty clear to me how easy I could fool people into thinking I was. But yeah, you're right, too many feminists believe in bullshit with no scientific research or academic research to back it up.