What are your opinions on the ethics and morality of creepshots, //b/?
>>680152922
it's creepy?
Get caught you fucking Pervrt, and go,to jail.
>>680152922
lets talk law you guys
in a privately owned property, taking photos is governed by whomever owns that property
on the other hand taking photos outside is perfectly fine
on the third hand taking photos that are of someone and then trying to sell those is illegal without their permission
but taking photos of a crowd and selling that in a public setting is fine
if people walk around half naked outside in public its their own fucking fault
if you take a photo of someone inside and they take offence and then the property owner takes their side, even if they're wearing a black trash bag with a slit you can be fucked in the butt
tl;dr take it outside /b/
I don't think taking creeps in a public place is a big deal. The subject is dressed like that in public for all to see anyway. I do think taking up skirt photos crosses the line. You're taking a picture of something that isn't reasonably public. Also taking pictures of children is gross.
OC 1/2
>>680152922
What they don't know don't hurt them
>>680154886
Excellent
>>680154685
>>680154745
Very nice
OC
>>680152922
If you get caught creepin in NY, you end up having to register as a sex offender, so no.
>>680152922
its fine until it happens to you
>>680155117
Really? That's such BS. All creep shots or just up skirts?
>>680155065
Lies
>>680155487
>implying anyone would be aroussed by a /b/ro
>>680154981
Thanks. More OC
>>680152922
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
>>680152922
>>680155749
No thank you
I don't get how people can take these photos, I've tried for a while but I cant get it down.
>see girl I want to creepshot
>walk up to her
>"hey, do you mind if I take a photo of your underwear from under your skirt please"
>they literally start screaming
>cops are called
>I try to explain to the cops tjhat all I wanted to do was to take some pictures
>go to jail
>have to register on some thing called a "sex offender" list
what am I doing wrong?
>>680155749
>>680156002
No, thank you.
>>680154824
Delicious
OC here
>>680155749
Gonna need some moar of dat ass fam
>>680153597
It's not illegal to photograph people in public.
>>680156002
Wasn't a question
>>680156244
>fam
Low class nigger
>>680156320
Forgot a comma
>>680156374
Activate
>>680156002
>>680156105
>>680156320
My bad. Misunderstood you.
>>680156376
Or trendy white boi
>>680156415
>>680156441
Get a room faggots
oc
wanted to bang her so bad
>>680156438
>>680156244
I have more, but not on me. That was the best picture though
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
>>680156255
checked...but in the US some states and municipalities have laws regarding creepshots. Google it...its not hard to find. The whole "no expectation of privacy while in public" isn't quite correct when it comes to unwanted photography or even recording of conversations. Again this varies according to municipality.
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and Youre all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
>>680156647
OC 1/2
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on its recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
>>680155973
>>680156735
Get off my Chan
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
but is it a creepshot if they see you taking the picture?
>>680156983
>>680152922
>>680152922
Dumb and pointless. Why waste your time taking blurry pics of girl's asses when there's a trillion tonnes of proper HD porn on the internet?
>>680156921
>>680156999
Nope. It's a caught shot
>>680156999
bam...checked. and more of these hos
>>680156735
Lol. He thinks he's people.
>>680156693
Amazing
I like it just because I know she doesn't.
Kind of like making a girl choke on your dick. It doesn't feel any better than just getting head. But the choking noise. Her eyes watering up. I like it. Just like I enjoy some botch that thinks she can walk around like a slut and not have some guy take pictures of her smelly ass
>>680156555
I do too
This was years back. The best years of my life, when I nailed a 8/10. She was funny and witty and tiny bit chubby. Perfect. Don't even get me started on how great the sex was. It was mind fucking amazing. She was a beast. Wild as fuck. Was into all kinds of roleplays and shit. One night she would cover herself in blue bodypaint and the next night it would be latex.
So anyway we broke up . She wanted to pursue acting. I was against it. I didn't want her to get with other men even if it was just for a movie and didn't mean nothing. She was adamant and I had to let her go.
It's unfair right. I mean I'm the man and how dare she go on her own ways without thinking about me or our future together. We don't talk anymore not only because we ended on bad terms but because I did something so cruel after. I wanted to hurt her and put her in her place. I wanted her to know the pain I went through. I needed closure more like I wanted the last laugh.
Fast forward 2014
She had gone on to become an actress. A successful one. I mean this bitch was getting movie deals one after the another. So I got to thinking what would be the best way to bring down a well know personality. By ruining their reputation or publicly shaming them, exposing them. You might have already guessed what I did. Yes. I leaked her nudes. It went big. I fucking love it now when people see her the first thing that comes to their mind is her banging tits and shaved cunt. Fucking win. I have all the closure I need. I'm over her now and can carry on happily knowing the world has a whole other perception about her. A dirty slut one. Win. Anyway her names Jennifer Lawrence. You might have heard of her. Lots of mindless sheep look up to her.
>>680156244
How about this one dude?
>>680157207
hope there is more
>>680156555
but instead you took a photo and beat off to the fantasy at home. sad.
>>680156735
Women aren't people therefore you cannot rape them.
>>680156999
I feel like if you're not a 40 year old man and you're actually attractive that this might be a good way to pick up these kind of girls.
>obviously take photo
>insecure girls looking for approval notice
>laugh and kind of make fun of you
>you laugh and make a remark not acknowledging what you just did
>they say some dumb as shit stuff back to you like "haay"
>you reply with some thing normal to get a convo
>fuck
>>680157393
sure is, here's one of them running away...gotta love it. The set was easy to find, check the file name
>>680157341
Works for me
>>680152922
>>680156244
>>680156255
>>680156555
>>680156999
>>680157155
>>680157399
checked, get em while the gettins good
>>680152922
If it's a girl I hate I'll take the creep shot then cum all over it then post it on 4chan
>>680154014
Forgot one important rule: If taking those pictures with the reason for stalking, espionage, or sexual purposes without the individuals permission it is against the law.
>>680156999
>creep shot? More like caught shot.
>>680152922
Who the fuck cares, faggot?
>>680152922
YO old OLL pic?
>>680157908
>caught shot
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
faggot
>>680157908
it was funny the first time in this thread
>>680155973
>"HEY MOM I POSTED IT AGAIN, AM I A GOOD BOY?!"
![32.mp4_snapshot_03.21_[2016.03.04_14.17.06].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/aOvyLtd.jpg "32.mp4_snapshot_03.21_[2016.03.04_14.17.06].jpg")
>>680157802
8.5/10
![cand201308010-013.wmv_snapshot_00.25_[2016.04.18_21.09.30] - Copy.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/2hGpjdv.jpg "cand201308010-013.wmv_snapshot_00.25_[2016.04.18_21.09.30] - Copy.jpg")
![cand201308010-013.wmv_snapshot_00.28_[2016.04.18_21.09.58] - Copy.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/UeYL08o.jpg "cand201308010-013.wmv_snapshot_00.28_[2016.04.18_21.09.58] - Copy.jpg")
![cand201308010-013.wmv_snapshot_00.24_[2016.04.18_21.08.03] - Copy.jpg](https://i.imgur.com/9Jae7YD.jpg "cand201308010-013.wmv_snapshot_00.24_[2016.04.18_21.08.03] - Copy.jpg")
>>680156805
If women don't want to be creepshotted, maybe they should cover the fuck up and stop wearing ass-tight leggings as pants. You can literally take pictures of whoever you want in public, but if they are actually wearing clothes they shouldn't mind being "creepshotted"
>>680158540
Still sexy
>>680158181
>>680158225
Mmmmmmmmm love seeing myself being posted here. Makes me so horny and wet. It's the reason I go out like this.
Are you guys masturbating to me??
>>680158676
>myself
You know the rules.
>>680154886
"What they don't know don't hurt them"
-Bill Cosby
>>680158792
yummy
>>680159064
A little too much booty for me.
>>680156735
First of all, nice degree.. Not.
Secondly, you're only partially correct, the law would consider it stalking / menacing. Both could be felonies, even if the pictures are taken in a public space. In no way is this considered rape because rape implies contact has been made, penetrative or not.
OC time
>>680152922
Most certainly creepy. I guess if you don't show faces and the victim doesn't notice, it's not that bad. If it happened to me I'd be creeped out but not traumatized.
>>680152922
>ethics and morality
>/b/
pick one
Couldn't get close enough to this girl :(
OC 1/?
>>680159243
>Nice degree...Not
>...not
White teen girl detected
![[hnnggg intensifies].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/FoWtZJP.jpg "[hnnggg intensifies].jpg")
>>680158181
>>680158225
>>680159243
this is not correct in any way. Source: PHD in Law
>>680155117
No. It has been established that anyone in public has zero expectation of privacy. By public, we're talking streets, sidewalks, parks, beaches, etc. Not a fucking McDonald's or soe shit.
>>680159747
More OC :D
>>680159064
is this real life?
SkrillGrillz? Needs moar
>>680159830
You're full of shit, you would have called it a JD you idiot. Way to out yourself as not knowing shit.
>>680159322
Only had two of this girl. :(
got a couple more side shots if anyone wants them
>>680156649
yet you are here too, with us, what does that make of you? because no one decides to browse /b/ just to try and 'rescue people from their wrong ways'
This ass @_@
2/?
College is basically the best for this.
>>680159830
also
“Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or
anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without
the consent of the victim.”
Source https://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/recent-program-updates/new-rape-definition-frequently-asked-questions
Government site. Eat shit lying faggot.
>>680160219
>>680159915
OR IS IT JUST FANTASY
>>680159604
nice
>>680156805
I thought rape implies some sort of penetration, besides the lack of consent
>>680158676
proof
>>680160287
Goddamn.
>>680152922
I would recognize this class everywhere, someone has more? OC still owed me that brunette in schoolgirl outfit
>>680160571
3/?
>>680156693
Also, people need to learn the definition of public space. A school certainly isn't one and anyone there is probably under-aged.
>>680155973
4/?
>>680152922
It's a peccadillo
IDK if this counts, but this is from peeping my neighbor's window.
I think that's pretty creepy, but i don't know if it's creepshot material.
>>680160188
please no more of this shit
>>680155973
>>680156649
>>680156735
>>680156805
>>680156859
>>680156921
>>680156983
I have a PHD in clinical psychology and You're all literally rapists.
You're violating these women by viewing and sharing their photos without their consent; it doesn't matter whether or not these photos were taken by them, their lover, or a stranger on the street. A big part of what defines the act of rape is the lack of consent and there is clearly a lack of consent here. These images are even more appealing to you because there is an aspect of "forbidden fruit". In addition, you find a thrill when you do these type of acts in hope that you will see something special. The fact that you have no morals or ethics is a sign that you have a deeper psychiatric issue going on inside your head. This is a form of sexual assault. You don't see it as such because you have been blinded by rape culture.
If I were to punch you in the face, you'd be in pain. If I were to shoot you in the torso, you'd be in more pain. Both actions cause you pain, but one more than the other; the lesser act of assault is not negated simply because you could be a victim of a greater act of assault. Likewise, the act of sharing and viewing these photographs is still a violation of these victims/women regardless of whether greater forms of sexual assault exist. The way these victims/women dress does not warrant any coercion nor negative criticism of their character. Their privacy is an object permanence that does not need to be expressed. With their clothes on it is recognized as a continuous implied "No" and yet you continue on with your acts. Men have been locked up for less than three "No's" in the act of rape by their victim. These people are not asking for it nor would any normal person under the same circumstances.
If you sick individuals have a conscience, you will cease viewing and sharing these stolen/shared photos because you are currently no different than a common rapist.
>>680161053
Aaaand... where's the rest of it?
>>680160966
your taste. it is no good.
>>680155973
>>680157207
Where did you get the set? I can't find it
I don't know. This was a tremendous nut I'm going on round 3.
>>680156255
it can be, at least where I live
you are to be informed about it, if you knew you might end up on media you might have avoided the spot, hence why stores etc have to inform you if they are recording their store
>>680156735
I have a PhD in neuroscience and I clean my poop with your pseudo-science.
Apart for /b/ jargon,
try to also consider something more concrete like why women compete with each other to be the sluttiest.
They get more than a thrill in doing that, and men get sexually aroused by looking, nothing more normal than that.
I still thinks it's wrong to take pictures though, some women might want attention but not at that point.
>>680160548
Oh cmon /b/tards
>>680156555
moar?
>>680161702
>>680161844
Go ahead anon
>>680161844
jez
5/?
>>680159860
nice any of her face?
>>680152922
Ethically it's wrong. Morally it can be seen as OK in the eyes of some poeple, or terrible in others.
That's the thing about morality is that it shows the true nature of a person, whether they are a prick or a good person to follow what is ethically right.
I'm actually curious on why people do this instead of just talking to the person.
Unless she's a known bitch then fucking take a picture of inside her colon please.
>>680161905
damn anon you spoil the fun
>>680162396
only niggers start a conversation based on looks
even if you arent black, you're automatically a nigger
>>680156735
Really? Do you know where you are?
>rape culture
>three no's
Do you even know what site you're on?? How did you get here? It's not even summer yet for fucks sake
>>680156735
Go back to tumblr
>>680162830
>only niggers start a conversation based on looks
Okay let me just look up her entire history on earth just to make sure I can say hello.
7/?
>>680160116
hnng... who is that?
>>680156735
The reason that the law states it's okay to take pictures like this if they're outside is because, in the eyes of the law, if a girl steps outside wearing something, she consents to being seen in it. Not that difficult of a concept. This is miles away from the concept of rape, girls don't consent to being raped if they dress like this.
They dress like this to be seen, and they're being seen. They are getting exactly what they want
And you would have us believe this is because of some fucking "rape culture".
Go back to tumblr, feminazi
?/?
>>680163157
have you EVER talked to someone in public after just randomly walking into her, a complete stranger?
if you ever did, you're a nigger. normal people dont do that. seeing someone / and or being attracted to her isnt a basis to start a conversation
>>680163757
So how would you meet someone then?
>>680163757
Nah you're just autistic
>>680163832
at a bar, club, friends + family, dating platforms, some kind of social place in your town or at least someone that I have seen before
>>680158796
Fuck you
>>680164114
>friends + family
Kek
Yes hello there future possible girlfriend this is my mom.
>>680164329
kek
>>680156649
Don't dress up like
>>680156693
This
And don't wear a bikini that barely covers your vag and tits.
Whatever rape isn't even a thing anyway.
All women lie about it
>>680157338
All I got out of that is
Women are whore
Women use sex for successes
And men are right
Faggot
what they dont know wont hurt em
>>680164329
more like my sister has a friend who's single
>>680160019
fuck yes post
>>680165834
Hello I see that you are my little sisters friend.
Look I know you're just twelve but hear me out-
>>680152922
As long as your not touching the person or violating their personal space aka arms length. your ok in eyes. i wouldn't give a shit if some one was taking a picture of video of me neither should anyone else. But does it make you look creepy and weird sure the fuck does and don't expect at some point not to get your ass beat if you get caught. lol
OC
why dont women have class anymore like in the old days. whores everywhere
>>680166583
I am kind of agreeing with this.
>>680166583
You can find the answer at >>>/pol/.
No sarcasm.
>>680155973
>PHD in clinical psychology
even in the realm of pseudoscience, psychology is a joke
>>680152922
>What are your opinions on the ethics and morality of creepshots, //b/?
anything that can be seen by a camera out in public is fine
shit that is done in places considered private (e.g. showering, toileting, etc) = not okay, but still interesting sometimes
>>680156074
no idea, it works for me
maybe you are hideously ugly?
6/?
>>680161471
Thecandidforum.com
It's in the beach category somewhere and has quite a few views. If you sort by clicks, it's on page 1-3 somewhere
>>680156555
Instead of trying to ask the girl out you want so much you just tip your fedora and take a photo
>>680152922
> discussing "ethics" and "morality" on /b/
> op is a newfag
>>680158676
>bait harder
what about this one i got in class?
>>680159064
10/10
>>680152922
>ethics and morality of creepshots
what the fuck kinda gay shit is this?
>>680167658
are you hiding in a fucking plant?
any of you kids here want to creepshoot your mom and share with us? Ill reward you with steam stuff or whatever you kids want these days
>>680168100
FUCKIT/?
>>680159064
>not asking for it
One of my history teachers got arrested and sacked for going into supermarkets with a camera in his shoes and sliding them under girls' skirts, found a shitload of videos of it on his computer, think shit like that is too creepy he deserved to get arrested imo.
>>680160287
too bad it's blurry
fucking retard
>>680168529
howd he get caught?
>>680156555
There's a seat open right in front of her
>>680168699
>hey there cutie can you please put your phone down for just a second and have a conversation with me like a normal human bean
>>680168997
>human bean
kek
>>680163757
just admit you are an autist that prefers counting toothpicks to talking with women
>>680168997
Yup this. Putting a phone down these days is hard for quite a lot of people.
Also kek.
>>680168624
Some girl clocked him doing it in the shop then told the employees, they got his car reg as he was leaving an told the piggies.
>>680158592
urghh slut shaming fuck you asshole
>>680157059
Because they don't want us to see, but they have no choice. That's the big difference.
Skirts are not full coverage. What happens if there is a gust of wind? What is the girl gonna sue the wind? What if the girl is standing on something and the angle lets you see up her skirt? Is she gonna sue the laws of physics?
you don't want anyone seeing your underwear wear pants.
Rate these fat asses.
>>680173053
more?
>>680152922
If you wear it in public, it's public domain.
>>680173053
not fat / 10
thick fucking thighs tho, moar
>>680174056
>>680173053
9/10 ass, thighs 10/10
>>680169726
Go back to tumblr faggot
>>680174255
Go crawl in a cave you knuckle dragging poster child for abortion
>>680168641
The whale! She be white now!
>>680174770
dude keep going!
>>680160402
As a kid my mom once offered me a glass of water, I rejected as I wasnt thirsty. She forced me to drink it. She abused her authority and therefor raped me.
>>680168641
dude, please stop, green peace isn't thrilled about it, neither any on us
>>680177211
she might have forced you, not raped you, there's a reason why in a sofisticated lenguage are several words that you can use to different cases each one, in some cases some of them may mean the same, this is not the case
>>680157905
This guy knows.
The law is called voyeurism...
>>680179186
noice
>>680179482
She get fucked this night
>>680179771
Story?
>>680180048
not by me but yes x) she was left in the same position
>>680161053
>>680161410
>>680161530
>window creeper
Ma nigga. I always feel immorality with creepshots, but window voyeur is the shit.
What's the opinion of creepshots of your significant other?
>my wife
>>680156693
MORE MoRE MOER?
>>680180609
Shouldn't it be the opposite? Window creeping is invading their privacy, creepshots in public aren't.
>>680157905
>>680179305
but to bypass the whole voyeurism thing could you just claim anthropological/cultural studies
>another of my wife
I'm her stay at home husband. It's relaxing but a little lonely.
>>680163757
Let me guess: you think you're a Nice Guy because you don't start talking to women you don't know? And then you wonder why no woman will go out with you, even though you're a Nice Guy and why they always choose jerks?
>>680152922
as long as the "victim" isn't recognizable, like photo has been taken in a way it doesnt show it, i don't see anything bad in creepin.
>>680181111
damn, nice quads
guys, what's a free, light and easy to use program to make webms in windows?
I used to make them in linux with vlc and arista, but it's so much trouble having to use two programs, is there an esasier way in windows?
>>680181111
The quads speak truth
>>680181581
"webm for retards"
>>680180923
Well, if by "window creeping" you mean actually sneaking into someone's property and deliberately peeking into their window then sure, there's an actual privacy violation there. That's not what I mean though, I was actually thinking more of an apartment Rear Window-like thing. Y'know, just chilling in your floor looking out your window into the others.
>>680182337
ok that really helps, you wanna just be a jerk, or want more creepshots?
>>680183225
fake, who change his/her clothes with the car door open?
>>680155749
I need moar, anon. This is serious.
>>680163757
>Said the beta permavirgin
Kek
If I can see it with my eyes then a picture for private use should be legal. Like fucking recording on tapes off the radio or TV was
>>680163250
moar like this?
>>680153395
>>680153597
>>680154478
>first posts are in support of respect and decency
And here I thought I was going to be the only moralfag ITT again.
>>680155973
So it's rape everytime I look at someone without their consent? Get fucked. Not everything requires consent. Do I need consent to call you a faggot, faggot? Whoops guess you just got raped then
>>680152922
depends on the angle. upskirt is a pretty shitty thing to do. taking pictures of people in public showing off what is clearly visible at regular eye level is fine.
>>680159850
You expect privacy in mcdonalds? Are you retarded?
Hot alien chick
>>680180829
>UGG Boots
>Being worn anywhere but at home
>>680170311
This makes a baffling amount of sense. As a man if I was wearing a towel or a kilt or anything skirt-like and someone saw my ass I'd think it was my own fault regardless
If every monkey had photographic memory of every monkey ass- would it be okay, to slip roofies into every drink to ease the kink?
>>680178558
She put something in his body without his consent. Rape
>>680183332
omg its more of the girls at the bean. I have that short webm, but do you have the full video of this? or moar of the pics?
Google invents smart contact lens with built-in camera.
>>680180829
Why the fuck would you need or want to do that you autismal fuck?
>>680186186
one, water helps you live, two, penetration is not the same as putting something in a body, three, if you are underage or a kid, your parents will put a lot of food/water/medication/clothes without your consent cause you know shit about anything
>>680186348
now i just have to put these little fuckers in everyday
>>680186350
cuckold maybe?
I think the same way as you, I love my gf, even if she's hot and I'm proud of her cause I'm fucking her and not so many other that want to, but I still wouldn't do that to her, she's not a random slut, she's my gf
>>680155973
I hate to add validity to your post by disagreeing with it, but you're wrong. Consent is implicit in the fact that these people are out in public looking like they do. If you don't want to be seen dressed sexually, then don't leave the house when you're dressed sexually. This is obviously not the case in upskirt/changing room creeps, but they're the exception, not the rule.
Basically, if you didn't want people to look at your ass and nudge their friend and say, 'look at that ass', then you shouldn't have worn clothing that accentuated your ass. Just because the nudging is happening digitally doesn't change the essence of the interaction.
>>680183178
im not joking, its a program for windows, the google result should be on github
its a zip to download, can anyone confirm? A lot of people use it.
>>680160883
A school certainly is one, just one with special conditions based on the fact that most of the individuals in schools aren't actually people in the eyes of the law.
My gf has a decent ass and wears denim short shorts pretty often.
Once caught a guy taking a creep shot of her while we were at the market and ended up giving him a bit of a show by kissing her and grabbing her ass, spreading it, pulling her shorts up and stuff.
I always wonder if I'll ever see them here some day, I hope so!
>>680187658
>>680186975
>>680186014
>>680185622
>>680185176
>>680184806
>>680183352
>>680180780
>>680176708
What the fuck are you guys doing? Did you read the fucking title? This is a CREEPSHOT thread!
>>680161826
>>680160548
Still there?
>>680188056
This is not a creepshot thread. This is a thread about opinions and morality of creepshots. The photos are irrelevant I was just getting people horny.
>>680188384
>I was just getting people horny.
That sounds genuinely gay
