fluffy abuse 2
lmao what do you mean "this again"? are you seeing this shit? It's like walking in on a huge shit on your floor and not saying "smells like shit"
You could incorporate as much of the canon as possible. Fluffy creation would be very intricate, like spore. The breeding would also be intricate, with actual traits passed down generations.There could be a mmorpg element where you compare and compete with other people's fluffies...
Someone call for the Alice comic?
Holy fuck I forgot the image again
If someone found this shit on my computer, i would be fucked. I'm only this edgy on 4chan not in real life
A happy enfie babbeh doesn't make sense
Riley Reid looks nothing like Laci
Death to Bestest babies and the shitty mothers who abandon their poopy ones
Alice is probably the most pathetic fluffy I've seen
To be fair, most of the shit fluffies think or do makes no sense
This one's hugbox if you ignore the second half of it
>beats the living shit out of a fluffy that broke a house rule
What more do you want??
>Not adopting a bunch of rapists for your kid
This one's also hugbox if you ignore the second half
Thanks. never saw this one before.
The whole story I mean, not just that part
She just looks so sad and pathetic. Just begging for some abuse
>hurr durr you all are autists
>stop liking things I don't like
Look at this shit
Oh well, since no one else seems to be here, may as well post my personal fav
proper representation of a brony.
Nobody bit, for whatever reason. Conversations are still active in the old thread, so if you'd like to talk about it, you could try here or there (>>680042141), though unless somebody else bites it'll be you talking and me silently listening, for the most part.
>Slap i when ever it says dadeeh
>Slap it when ever it dosent use daddeh when it should(Tank you,love you)
>Fluffy goes in to exetensional crisis on how to address daddeh
>fluffy stuck in semi-vegitative state. Can function but clearly isnt in this relm of thinking.
>mindlessly lives its life
i used to cum inside a fluffy bitch
she'd push my load out her axe-wound and make music with the queefs
u ever heard cum queefs make sick beats bruh?
this was her favorite song to queef to me:
Anyone got a comic about a fluffy that rapes one of its foals and the foal has trouble shitting properly? I remember it vaguely.
There was a version about the fluffy eating the dinner the owner made for his date, but there wasn't a follow up (or I didn't see it) so maybe it was hugbox as well
I love the urban feral fluffy thing.
I got some sadbox for you right here my man
Engrished dialog aside, this is one of my favorite renditions of what a fluffy should look like.
If I saw this scratching at my back door, she would have a home. Babies and all.
Do you not understand these are for cathartic purposes?
Do you not think in the entire world that people are killing domesitic animals? Hell multiple countries eat them.
This is the percentage that does.Fluffy is a vermin to the world,they are littler killing crops and killing the streets with a fuck ton of feces.They have no purpose other then abuse them,sure have them as a pet,but the fluffy has a gestation period of 3 days,you'd have a fuck ton of fluffy within a month,think of the people that are breeding these for profit,no all places grind them up,they just throw them out or tkick them till they stop trying to come back.
Sorry for slow posting, my internet is flakey.
Continuing the game discussion from the last thread:
>What actually drives profit, assuming in the game income is a main objective.
You would get profits for fulfilling contracts, which would be delivered every morning by mail. They could be things like "Female pegasus, color blue, send within next 10 days". New contracts would come every day and old ones would expire, and you'd fulfill whatever you can. For that you'd need to have a fluffy that fulfills the parameters, pack it in a box and send it out. The more advanced contracts would require things like "male unicorn, coat blue, mane green, happy and obedient", which would require not only the right colors but also that it was raised happily and firmly enough. The more specific color and type requirements would force you to have a large stock of fluffies just standing by in case someone would want them, taking time and resources but providing a big payback if they're exactly what a customer wants.
For the costs, food, toys and medicine would be obvious. That would also mean that you might feel inclined to let less-valuable fluffies die rather than spending money on saving them.
Sure. I suppose the strictness of the contract would be variable, and could have somewhat more general/complex requests.
Would this be ethical gameplay (mostly), profitable abuse, profitable full-on abuse, or allow full-on abuse for fun?
I don't download this shit. The only thing I'm worried that people will find is my folder full of lord dominator pictures
EVERY FUCKING THREAD
>Would this be ethical gameplay (mostly), profitable abuse, profitable full-on abuse, or allow full-on abuse for fun?
Amoral profit-seeking. Obviously keeping fluffies alive and healthy would be beneficial, but the goal of it all would be to make money. A thousand fluffies dying horribly wouldn't matter at all unless someone wanted to pay for them.
It would be fun to see how people started off with high ideals, but eventually started cutting corners for quick buck at the expense of the fluffies well-being.
I originally envisioned the game as a private breeder working at home, getting contracts by mail and sending the fluffies away by mail. A shop would indeed be nice, but the contract-system would avoid having to model and program the customers.
I don't think there's a comic about this.
They don't have to be both there right away, and primitive temporary graphics are fine. I'm not worried about the actual code behind the customers.
Not sure, I'd have to consider it more closely. I'm interested in making this game, but no promises that I will make it, though at this point I likely will. If I do make it, I won't really be in a big hurry.
I have no idea. Some people make interesting games in weeks, while the depressed developer trio at the another chan barely makes progress in months.
A pet-fluffy game is what everyone in the fandom dreams of, but the castration game would be a quick little curiosity to finish.
Just finished, inspired by an image of a collection of very brief accident stories, can't remember the author.
Pretends to be ethical. All of the "abuse" options are not readily apparent. The player is even told "don't hit the fluffy! give the fluffy love and hugs!" so just like in the Sims only those with a sense of exploration will try abuse. Once they abuse and see the rewards they will try more. They will take it over the top and kill the fluffy but then try again, balancing the abuse/profit ratio while trying to keep the "wan die" and "smarty" meters from going into the red.
About that, I've toyed with an idea about a fluffy temperature-measuring simulator. Somewhat like lockpicking in Oblivion, you'd have to fiddle the thermometer into the fluffies butt, feeling around and observing its reactions to see which way to push it and how hard.
Anyway, its 5AM here, so I should have been asleep at least three hours ago. Goodnight, and good luck with the games!
This REALLY needs to be posted in every single thread...
they are basically a representation of the worst parts of society bottled up into a package of stupid little creatures nobody gives a fuck about. There is an image that explains it in a bit more depth but this is a general summation of it.
My version of "not in a big hurry" is actually rather fast, but I say it since sometimes I need to stop development for as long as a week, depending upon what's going on in my life.
The castration game is interesting, but I didn't really see anyone else respond to it so I figured there wasn't much interest. If there is interest, I can consider it too, before or after the fluffy shop game.
By pet fluffy game, that would be a different, but similar, game than the fluffy shop yes? I usually write my code to be very reusable, so if anybody else wanted to use my work as a basis or if I did it in the long term, it would be possible too.
That's an interesting way to do it, though I wonder how it wouldn't block more extreme abuse since it might be more difficult to access directly.
Also, should there be any reason to not be horribly abusive other than for gameplay decisions? It doesn't have to be negative to the main gameplay, but some incentive/fun to do otherwise would be interesting, at some more difficulty.
I'm not personally interested in making these things, but it would be cool if somebody made them.
Ive been trying to find this one for ages but didnt know what keywords to search on the booru. I dont like how it ends, but the harsh yet thoroughly effective training is good.
Not new, friend. I just never really got the big picture of it you know? I stopped going on /b/ for a few years and went mostly on /k/ and /v/ and when I came back I found this. It's interesting to look at the pics of how they die, but I still don't get the appeal y'know.
It was originally a reaction to the reams of MLP posters that were here.
That's it. The end. MLP troll idea.
MLP guys ended up with their own chan but the fwuffy faggots never fucking followed them or left or even realized the original idea was a troll.
Now they're all into it because they're a bunch of autistic basement dwellers who don't know any better.
That does not change why we like it.
The actual origin is apparent in the nature of the material. Fluffies possess the intelligence to speak and to understand spoken language yet they lack actual sapience, they have no capacity for wisdom despite having the capacity for individual identity. This is completely impossible, an intelligence that functioned in this fashion could not be genetically engineered nor could it be simulated.
So, you see the real purpose of a fluffy is to direct hatred specifically at human identity while leaving human sapience entirely out of it. Fluffies are a totemic proxy derived from a fad that irritates the community at large, they represent the worst of human tendency and emotion. They're intelligence without wisdom, they are being ritually sacrificed to wisdom in it's honor. Mix in a little body horror and you, evidently, have a fine ritual.
>By pet fluffy game, that would be a different, but similar, game than the fluffy shop yes?
By pet fluffy I meant the types of games that deal with fluffies doing things autonomously, such as eating, pooping, sleeping and hugging. I guess Virtual Fluffy would be a more correct term for it.
>That's an interesting way to do it, though I wonder how it wouldn't block more extreme abuse since it might be more difficult to access directly.
Inevitably, some fluffies wouldn't sell at all. Even a good-colored fluffy would be pretty worthless if it got crippled, so at that point there would be no reason not to do whatever you wish with it, unless you had some kind of friendship mechanics or fluffies teaching others thing in.
>Also, should there be any reason to not be horribly abusive other than for gameplay decisions? It doesn't have to be negative to the main gameplay, but some incentive/fun to do otherwise would be interesting, at some more difficulty.
That's the beauty of it: nothing has any repercussions whatsoever except maybe traumatizing the fluffies that witness it. There would be no reward either, so basically it would be a fluffy care game that just happens to allow you to misuse it if you want to.
I really don't understand this "hate hate hate!" thing some fans have going on. They really do everything they can to paint the fluffies as evil as possible, so they could feel like heroes when abusing them. Not judging, but I prefer my fluffies as innocent cuddly victims who are utterly shocked from the very idea of someone treating them badly on purpose.
To quote the booru: "there's been a trend lately to make every fluffy a furry little shit gremlin. If they were all monstrous little fucks there would be no breeding and selling them and they'd be driven to extinction pretty fast.
Also you're very right, the whole charm is that they are happy, loving little guys who honestly in their hearts think hugs and love make things better, everyone should be friends, and every human (god-giants with magic powers to them) is kind and loving. That's exactly why the real world hits them so hard. They can't fathom deception or betrayal so when "nu daddeh" crushes their foals infront of them it's like fucking cuthullu burst out and raped everything they know about reality."
Well, look at all of those awful breeding conditions involving milk fluffs, aphrodesiacs, rape, etc. Plus, pillowfluffs and similar fluffies could be included as actual products. I'm sure I'll add some sort of friendship mechanic, though I don't have time to detail, see below.
I don't actually have an account right now, so I guess I'll make one later. I don't have any good ideas and don't want this to be associated with my regular identity, so I guess I'll do a boring name, "FluffyShopDev", for now at least.
Agreed, although I like some of that, it's a bit excessive. I like some innocence and hugbox too.
I'm going to go for about 10 minutes. If the thread's still here when I'm back or another thread has been made, I'll continue discussion. I'm leaving auto-update on, so I'll get any messages everybody sends.
Your stallion wants to make babies but it is not time yet! WDYD
>ask him not to give enfies until you say so
>tell him there will be consequences for enfies
>gently flick his no-no stick and say "no"
>purchase an expensive fluffy chastity cage
>plug up his urethra with the nearest toothpick
>purchase a male "enfie box" fluffy for him to rape
>wait for him to give enfies then castrate him
Needs more hugbox options, and all the abuse ones should be "unlocked" more and more after the "gentle flick"
Yes, they are basically an evolution of the burping, peeing, pooping baby dolls meant to educate little girls on how to take care of a baby and as such only little girls or grown men who like little girl stuff can stand them. Just like MLP
I have no idea why I do it. I don't even like scene girls.
Actually, I wouldn't mind having to download it, it kind of reminds me of when I used to download 100~250mb games to spend some time.
Have you thought about using unity? I've never used unity, but I'd like to try it one day
I've got a thing for bad guys. Especially one's that do it for no reason.
looks nearly identical to a character drawing from south park
>That's the beauty of it: nothing has any repercussions whatsoever except maybe traumatizing the fluffies that witness it. There would be no reward either, so basically it would be a fluffy care game that just happens to allow you to misuse it if you want to.
Perhaps the player has an empathy meter. The empathy meter pays for the hugs, sketties, love, etc that he gives. The more abuse you give, the lower your empathy meter is (maybe you can give hugs and love but not sketties in the same day) but your discipline meter rises and you gain more abuse options under the guise of discipline.
Playing on hugbox is the end-game but also like playing on difficulty. The real goal is to get a good fluffy and raise him into a happy fluffy who obeys.
Forgot the file apparently?
Stop being a newfag an dlurk moar, this is several years old
I have no idea why it saying "Ifunny.co" at the end fucking got me.
That would work, obvious in hindsight.
Sure, but would most people agree?
I also like that take on it, though I don't know if I want to restrict hugs in response to abuse. Plus, abusers might want to have favoritism mechanics or something.
thinking of an old RPG called cyberpunk. the more cybernetic enhancements a person got, the lower their empathy got, which affected their ability to relate to other people in a positive way. In this case it would only relate to fluffies though. The top-level abuser, let's call him "Phil" would be a sociopathic Dr. Frankenstein (basically think light side vs. dark side in Star Wars RPG games)
So, if evil bar goes up, more abuse is unlocked. How do you propose the empathy bar works though (aside from being the opposite of the evil bar)? I understood that as a cap on huggie options, which I don't want for psychological abuse reasons. What would it do?
CLEAN MY POOPIE PLACE YOU FLUFFY SHIT!
>>secure your stuff
You want to encrypt your stuff, not just hide and "password protect" it (see bitlocker on windows). The password will be in plain text on the bat file you created to unlock the folder
Does anybody have the one before this one where he gets mad cause there's a hair in his pizza and he shaves the fluffy?
All my stuff is SFW
So, since game ideas have died down, I think I'll do it, starting soonish (assuming I keep getting some, and positive, feedback). Unfortunately, I'm a developer, not an artist/sound person, and while I can put forth good art, I am rather slow at it, which would make development take vastly longer. Is anybody interested in working with me there? You don't have to commit right here, of course.
I'd like to think that more hugs slowly increases the empathy cap, and high empathy can unlock things abuse can't. For example, the absolute highest power of empathy would be the near-impossible cure of smarty syndrome. Lesser abilities would be teaching a mummah or fluffy not to see alicorns as monsters, or rehabilitating an abused fluffy you wanted to keep because of its colors.
On the abuse side, one would unlock pillowfluffing, milkbags, litterpals, etc. The highest level of "discipline" might be fingerbanging foals for correctional purposes.
Ah, good point, I wasn't thinking about that. Yes, I think I will do this.
I'll likely start within a week, or not much over, though there won't be much to show for a while. This will be a fun project.
If this had an empathy/abuse rating, I would put it dead set in the middle, or neutral. Sending a fluffie into the harsh life of an adult is abusive, but could also be viewed as absolutely necessary. Of course a HugBox master would never do this. And if a viable balance never presents itself (in the actual comic there are darker abuse tactics) as an option for the fluffy to be good and be redeemed, it would be on the dark side of the meter.