WHY IT'S OK TO BE A PEDOPHILE?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aq8J83lChgA
>what is /b's opinion
some females below the age of 18 are really attractive and gets people's pee-pees hard
>>677142483
i keked 10/10
Fucking disgusting tbh fam
no thanks b8 and b&
>>677142928
>>677142712
RELATIVES
its really not
>>677142620
pedophilia is being attracted to pre-pubescents, or those less than 13. Being attracted to 13-18 year olds is normal. Ephebophilia is what describes that
>>677142483
Who is this kid
>>677143391
but you agree that ACTING on those feelings is wrong yes
>>677142483
that girl is my new hero and role model in life
>>677143493
Its only wrong because of our legal structure.
>>677143627
this
>>677143627
its wrong morally.
>inb4 moralfag
>>677143984
moralfag
roast this faggot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TK7Efp6rToA
>>677142483
made it through 30 seconds. the fuck is wrong with that bitch.
i remember a glorious time before all you fucking sjw whiteknight newfags started showing up.
CP would stay up for hours instead of a couple minutes.
Fuck you for ruining my /b/ fucking faggot
>>677144405
>>677144405
Why don't you take a seat
>>677144330
>made it through 30 seconds. the fuck is wrong with that bitch.
what, you never heard of Freedom of speech ?
>>677142483
Pedophilia is wrong. Honestly, I think pedophiles should get the death penalty.
>>677144966
checked
>>677144405
>>677142483
She's just acting; calling for attention. Her messy hair, To-catch-a-predator-hat, low voice . . . she's trying to look younger.
18, 17...7..these are just numbers you see
>>677144871
don't have a problem with her message, it's just her awkwardness made me cringe. i'd still dick her though.
>>677143984
depends on the culture
>>677144405
someone said it, thanks
>>677145192
>>677145374
MODS MODS MODS
>>677145615
>>677142483
no, its not. but keep in mind they are people too.. and hurting them does not make it better, get them pro help after a little beating. is my opinion.
also i think she is in a period of her life where she has to think a little bit more about it, then just impulsively laying up an video. but hey i just don't agree with her don't mean she does not have a voice..
>>677142483
because it's a perfectly natural sexual orientation like gayness. thus it must be legalized too.
>>677143984
You think that because you were told to, nothing more and nothing less. You would bang a girl that young if no one said it was inherently bad to do so. It really isn't, mommy and daddy just want to look like old school conservatives that don't let their daughter's fuck until marriage but they forget that those same old school conservatives married off their daughter's at that age too. That is how we got to this sjw bullshit we have today, so git gud.
SPEAK THE FUCK UP WHY IS SHE WHISPERING
>>677142483
I'd love it if she was a pedophile when i was young
>>677145983
acting young, insecure?
>>677144128
He's right though America hasn't fought for freedom since the revolutionary war. Everything we do now is for money. America brought 9/11 on itself and deserved it for thinking that it was big and bad and couldn't be touched. This country needs to burn to the fucking ground.
>>677144966
only a very small percent of people attracted to kids would actually hurt one. i believe a big majority of the population have various levels of pedophilic thoughts, but only psychopaths would act on there instincts and hurt innocent children.
this would explain why she's a bit fucked up.
she probably did something with an older guy and now he's in jail, and she feels guilty.
>>677142483
She speaks like there is someone off camera with a gun forcing her to say this.
>>677142483
diamonds
lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCozh_vbYdM
>am i driving
>no
>i am traveling
>>677144966
>>677146355
>>677146499
>>677146577
WTF IS THIS
>>677146905
love seeing this shit, why make their job hard, no wonder niggers get shot
I AINT NO MOTHERFUCKIN' SPOOBY
Pedo girls are sexy.
that's fucked up
>>677146499
"kek" are you fucking retarded? is it really that complicated to write something like "lol" or "haha" you complete fucking idiot?
>>677147721
>>677145262
>She's just acting; calling for attention. Her messy hair, To-catch-a-predator-hat, low voice . . . she's trying to look younger.
does that hat say "ace right on time" ? what is that from?
anyways your theory kinda makes sense
>>677147512
she's just dangerous unfortunately. she clearly likes older men, and judging by the video, has probably got someone into trouble already
after she got b& from here as underage, judging by her youtube channel, she went onto another chan with a far worse reputation than here.
>>677147512
Agree
>>677146905
haha that first cop is alpha, niceeee
>>677145601
not a problem
why the fuck are all these idiots here to begin with?
you wanted the dark evil corner of the web the scream MODS when you see something you dont like
its called leave the webpage...problem solved
i fucking hate all these sjws
>>677147603
Don't get pissy with me fucker, I'll put you in the fucking ground.
>>677147721
zozzle
>>677145601
kill yourself
>>677148287
hold him down whíle i fuck his daughter
>>677142483
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC-TgVW2te0lgT2Xxb5g-8RA/videos here's the girls channel she removed all of her videos after the thread about her yesterday
>>677147721
wow
welcome to 4chan newfriend
>>677148455
What did I miss?
>>677144330
she's clearly getting molested by her uncle, and likes it.
>initiated by the minor.....
not knowing what grooming is.....
>>677148417
forced meme = 14 year old newfag
>>677142483
>living in Europe in a country where the age of consent is 14
>when I was 20 I had a 15 years old gf and I even met her parents, everything was normal
>mfw Ameriburgers lose their shit when that happens
>>677143302
pretty sure im not XD
Roast this faggot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-F1hYq7CJlg
>>677142483
This bait is so bad I will not even post the meme.
>>677148855
checked
If you were an American, you would have been Jailed for up to 15 years, and put on the sex offender registry for life.
>>677148623
only newfags call someone new"friend"
>>677148672
Yeah, this, wasn't on /b/ yesterday and apparently missed fun
>>677148623
he's not your friend, buddy
>>677142483
one of her relatives is obviously a pedophile in jail so this is an attempt to make him/her seem like less of a criminal
Having sex with anyone more than 20% difference in your age is just plain wrong.
If you're 20 a 4 year difference above or below is acceptable, if your 50 a 10 year difference above or below is acceptable.
i think there is too little differentiation between psychotic child rapists, and people who feel affection towards kids.
also, why is lolicon a crime in so many countries - that's the biggest joke, imo
>>677149698
MODS MODS MODS
>>677149629
>obviously
there are two types of people in this world:
_those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
>>677149899
It creates pedophiles, and ultimately ends up with more children being hurt than had it not existed in the first place.
Lol when this girl turns 20 her tone will turn 180 degrees
>>677149890
just because you don't like it, it shouldn't be criminalized. - i like my grannies
>>677150067
so why aren't 90% of the population psychotic mass murderers...everyone watches violent movies.
>>677150067
so why aren't people killing each other after watchign violent movies?
>>677149890
>because my preferences align with society perfectly and therefore it's right
it's all preferences you stupid shit
>>677148855
well thats more or less an aceptable age gap... its not like ur a fucking adult old fuck just by turning 18 as murica sugest
>>677150152
CEEPEE
>>677149930
>retard
>>677150547
Either you're blind, retarded, 12 or all
>>677150067
Retarded argument is retarded
>>677150547
no you dip, that's not a child
>>677151121
not according the the state of maryland
>>677150067
That's wrong and you know it. Studies showed that it actually regulated and decreased pedophilic assaults in Japan. Having material to jerk off to helps with concealing your urge. How do you think 30yo virgins exist ? Masturbation. Seeing naked girls around the net didn't make them so urged that they rape women.
>>677149890
>my preferences are right and yours are wrong
Waaah.
Functioning Pedo here. It's absolutely wrong, but it's no biggie my niggas.
Just because you're attracted to a girl doesn't mean you're a monster, you don't have to indulge in monstrous acts. I'm attracted to little girls, and women alike, I don't go around raping everything I see.
Just like you wouldn't steal everything you want.
I grew up with very little parental supervision and fucked around with a lot of little girls my age. I carried that attraction into adulthood, and while it sucks, it's not the end of the world.
If any of y'all niggas feel fucked up because of your attraction, just ignore it. I am a father, I am in a long and successful marriage, I've never touched a single underaged person in a sexual manner. You are the master of your destiny. Just be realistic.
>>677150067
[Citation Needed]
>>677143984
But not wrong biologically
>>677149625
I'm not your buddy, guy.
>>677151703
He's not a guy fag
![image08[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/LR2sLWU.jpg "image08[1].jpg")
dick barf
>>677142483
Some young girls just get their much sooner than others and want more than the boys their age can offer. I would say it's fairly uncommon but if you've ever seen the Vicky videos she's is REALLY into it and doesn't seem to have been the least bit traumatized by it. Apparently she was actually seeking it out.
>>677151865
What's a "guy fag"?
>>677142483
I disagree with a lot of what she's saying.
And I may be a little biased cause I am one.
But I don't think there's nothing wrong with being a pedophile,
any more than it's wrong to be a homosexual.
You don't choose your sexuality.
However, child molestation and rape is fucked up. You choose that.
And if you choose that, you deserve to suffer the consequences.
That's just the way it is in our society.
Even still, I wish pedophiles didn't get lumped into the same group as child molesters.
Can't even have a serious discussion about pedophilia.
>>677151336
/thread
>>677152134
Don't fool yourself. Young girls don't know what the fuck they want and don't have the wisdom and education to make an accurate judgement.
>>677142483
Whats my name bitch?
>>677143627
this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this this
There is no moral, psychological, or biological reasoning against having relationships with boys or girls above the age of 15-16. Absolutely none. Prove me wrong, you can't.
>>677143984
How so?
>>677152524
Believe it or not, they're not mentally ready. Hell some 21 year olds aren't even mentally ready.
>>677152735
The same way some 21 year olds aren't ready some 15 year olds are. The just the way maturation works. Yes it requires time ultimately but some people get there much sooner and much later than others. There are certainly people at the age of 15 that are fully capable of understanding sex and the responsibilities it comes with. Not every 15 year old is some fragile little flower incapable of more "adult" activities.
>>677144405
>i remember
i dont rememver you just heard of it
I remember when the age of consent was 14 in my state. They have even since done a study, and found that raising it had no effect on the number of people who have been mentally harmed by engaging in sexual activities at too young of an age.
>>677142483
Ask jesus
K
>>677153236
>Not every 15 year old is some fragile little flower
Confirmed for a male with a hard-on wanting to fuck little girls.
Choose your words wisely, faggot.
Or you're actually also underaged, in which case you're still a fucking faggot.
Lel
>>677151336
So basically, you have self-control?>>677152436
Ehhh, but like... can that be proven?
And how much of it is "I don't know what I want" as opposed to "I wanted this, but now I don't want this" or "I want this, but I don't want the guilt/shame that comes along with it" i.e. prying losers constantly questioning your decisions
Nigger
>>677153999
lol why are you so angry
>>677153697
clearly they didn't raise it enough. many states are 16 which is too young. an 18 or 21 federally imposed limit needs to be set.
>>677154199
It's a topic worth being angry about. Claiming someone is angry doesn't win you the internet, kiddo.
>>677142483
Sounds like to me her much older boyfriend got busted with her and she is distraught.
>>677154319
Calling someone a faggot doesn't win you the internet either, kiddo.
>>677152298
>But I don't think there's nothing wrong with being a pedophile,
>any more than it's wrong to be a homosexual.
>You don't choose your sexuality.
so u define pedo as ur sexuality yet in ur fantasy world of bullshit u dont fuck the thing that defines ur sexuality ever? are stupid?
thats so stupid as saying that its ok to be homosexual as long as u dont fuck any man...
i mean its ur life man u like kids its ur problem.. but dont preach this bullshit like pedos are some inocent celibate shaolin monks or some shit.. in the end u wanna fuck kids period
>>677151336
take a page from this guy´s book u can tell hes no bullshit he tells it like it is and he knows its hard.. but diont come wth ur im inocent celibate shit
>>677154351
if that's the case, then she only thinks he's her "boyfriend", to him the relationship would have a whole different meaning, which is another reason that it is unacceptable.
>>677154319
haha
>>677154049
Think about any time you were younger and realize you are wiser and more intelligent now. Think about every petty thing you were ever angry about and think about how silly it sounds now. While that is anecdotal at best, it's still a very strong case against the young fucking around with the older.
15 year olds fucking 15 year olds is fine.
adults manipulating 15 year olds is wrong.
Lets define the terms, shall we. Pedophilia is the attraction towards children. A child is someone who is below the age of puberty, or whatever the legal age may be (depending on location). So The definition of pedophilia is dependent on the definition of child.
What is wrong with being attracted to a child? Having this attraction is not inherently wrong. It doesn't mean that they will by definition rape or abuse the child. Therefore, on its own there is nothing wrong with pedophilia.
But let us also discuss the age of consent. In the UK it is 16, with some lenience I am guessing. What does this mean? A 16 year old is usually in the middle of puberty, developing their sexual organs etc. The age at which this starts varies from person to person. A 13 year old can have the body of an adult. Does it make you a pedophile to be attracted to that 13 year old? Well, no. If they are going through puberty, then by definition, it does not. The reason for the age of consent is because minors are fucking stupid and impulsive. Being attracted to an 9 is year old is fine. Just don't fuck them. Because then you are a pedophile and a rapist. A rapist is inherently bad.
Child porn is a far more complex issue though. So, I guess 18 kind of makes sense. If you do stupid shit at 18 then you're just a fucking idiot. So moral of the story, don't fuck kids. But being attracted to them is fine, just make sure you don't touch them...
>>677154624
Exactly, because he would be an adult who is manipulating a child, and taking advantage for nothing more than sexual gratification.
>>677152735
>they're not mentally ready
Yeah, [citation needed] on that one boss.
You can't just blanket statement "everyone below 18 is completely and totally incapable of making an informed decision, and everyone above 18 is fully prepared to make their own choices." That's a retarded non-argument and you know it.
>>677154618
He said he's never touched an underaged girl.
So he's never fucked the thing that defines his sexuality.
Are you fucking stupid?
We're talking about the same exact thing.
I'm saying as it stands with the law,
fooling around with an underage person is illegal.
That's just the way it is in our society.
Homosexuals have fought hard for their right to engage in sexual activities with other homosexuals.
Pedophiles have not. And they likely will not,
because as I said,
pedophiles are lumped together with child rapists.
In societies eyes, we're already guilty of the crime even if we havn't offended.
Some may use that as a free pass to do whatever they want regardless of the consequences.
I am not one of those people.
I don't think the benefits are worth the consequences.
In the end, yes I want to fuck children.
But I havn't. And I won't.
There are other ways of dealing with the urges besides fucking children you stunned cunt.
>>677142483
it is ok to bring death to the bringers of death?
>>677143627
Its considered wrong because teenage girls are borderline retarded and easy to take advantage of. Its also looked down upon in general because what loser hangs out with teenagers when they are a grown fucking man.
>>677143984
Dat pussy tite doe
>>677155572
Never said ALL. MOST would be accurate, and the courts don't have time to be cherry picking and arguing who is ready and who is not, so yes the law is a blanket statement to keep things simplified.
I have no idea what she is talking about but that was a nice asmr
>>677155572
Surely it is better to say people who are ready, are not ready. Than say people who are not ready, are ready. If you can decipher what this reply means, you get a biscuit.
>>677142483
Pretty sure it's not ok
Idc if someone fucks a teenager but if you fuck a toddler that's fucking sick
I can't stand to be around teenagers personally. They're so fucking annoying
>>677152298
>Don't think there's nothing wrong
>Don't Nothing
Confirmed tard
>>677156310
>Idc if someone fucks a teenager but if you fuck a toddler that's fucking sick
Both are wrong, and both are the same. Both are children.
>>677156442
Because of a typo?
Because I typed nothing instead of anything,
I'm the retard?
Coming from someone who didn't even respond to any of the points I made in my post,
and who merely judges a persons intelligence by typing errors?
You stunned fucking cunt.
>>677154756
You kinda proved my point for me.
Exactly, when you're young, you make decisions and later you're like "eh, that was dumb." And you move on.
For example: when I was younger, I made the decision to eat a fuck ton of cookies and cakes and bullshit, I became fat as a result of it. The adults in my life enabled me to do so. They enjoyed seeing me happy, I enjoyed eating cakes, there was no problem. Years later, I'm fat and I regret it, but I'm not having my parents thrown in jail for giving me what I wanted.
Now swap cake for cock and you can see the point I'm making.
If the kid says she wants a mouth full of your dick and you're okay putting your dick in her mouth, I see no problem.
Note: Rape is still rape. No one should be forced to do anything, imo.
Ok and here's the weird part tho: "Grooming"
I'm not quite sure what could ever be done about that. Some people raise their children to be lawyers and then the kid grows up to be a rich asshole who hates life and an heros. Others raise their kids to bang em. I guess you just try not to let manipulative sacks of shit have kids? Idk
>>677148232
Shut the fuck up, 4chan was never your secret club and white knights have been around since the beginning, this place didnt start as a website for edgelords it started as a website for autistic anime fans.
>>677142483
what the fuck
>>677156835
And behold, the autists are still here.
>>677156828
>"Grooming"
If you just met an underage girl at a party, and ended up letting her suck your dick, that would be considered to be "grooming".
>>677156835
A subject more controversial than pedophilia... How fucking stupid a concept anime is.
>>677156802
>Using incorrect grammar
>calling it a typo
intelligence level nigger/100
>>677157388
>using nigger as an arguement
>>677142483
cultural marxism in action
>>677142483
LYNCH THEM ALL
>>677155735
u still face the same paradox i mentioned before m8
also same shit u didnt brought much to the table on ur response..alredy admited guilt u do want to fuck kids dont come saying u r inocent celibate monks guys get lumped wth rapist cuz in a certain way u are latent rapists
dont like what i said? dont compare ur shit to the homosexuals rights struggle not even the same shit
u so proud ur celibate just dont do it cuz u are afraid of the punishment,. u blame it on society like its ok to manipulate kids to ur sexual satisfaction dont come wth this bullshit crying like ur a poor inocent victim of society cuz u cant fuck kids willy nilly
at least those other pedos taht u call rapist have the balls to admit what they are, go ask pity somewhere else
In response to the youtube video. Yes, statutory rape is unfair in some situations. Assuming the girl is in America, the reason people go to jail if the underaged person initiates or comes on to the pedophile first is because statutory rape is a strict liability law which doesn't take into account the mental actions of the person having sex with the minor (as opposed to, say, murder which takes into account the actions of the person and the mental state of the person). Therefore, as long as you touch a child and the child is underaged you are in violation of the statute.
On the ground, however, this plays out differently. You'll have situations in which an 18 year old can be penalized for touching a 17 year old or where a 16 year old who looks 20 and lies to you to make you believe that she is that age, can still land you in jail if you're too old to touch her.
On the topic of child porn, however, I don't see anything wrong with owning it as long as you're not the one who put the child in a compromising situation to begin with. However, those who own, and worse, distribute these images can find themselves in jail longer than someone who committed first degree murder. While I agree that those who film these girls and sell videos for a profit should get their just desserts, those who merely download them and fap should be blameless or at the very least be guilty of a misdemeanor.
That's just my take on it at least.
>>677142483
hot
>>677154756
At age 15 I was more informed about safe sex and birth control options than most US adults. That's a stupid argument. "Well some people don't know enough about it so it shouldn't be allowed!"
>>677155459
>if a person has sex with someone their own age, it is a consensual relationship
>if a person has sex with someone younger than them, it is manipulation, grooming, etc
So a 16 year old girl is TOTALLY incapable of manipulating a guy her age, but an 18 year old girl is *absolutely* manipulating her 17 year old boyfriend? Get the fuck out.
>>677155837
>what loser hangs out with teenagers when they are a grown fucking man.
Well it happens in most civilized countries in the world (not the US, lol!) and almost every successful ancient society because biology dictated their norms rather than arbitrarily defined rules for sex.
>>677156079
So we say at 21 they're ready to vote and drink alcohol, but at 16 they're ready to drive a 5,000 pound vehicle easily capable of killing everyone inside and anyone they hit? And then in the middle at 18 they just *poof* suddenly know how to responsibly have sex?
The circumstances aren't the problem, my friend. The law is wrong.
>>677156081
Only if the repercussions are a statistically significant burden on society. Birth control, condoms, and termination are all options that are, outside of the completely backwards hardcore republican states, readily accessible. I think the minor, rare case of regret is much better than the *guaranteed* ruining of someone's life because they dated someone 2 years younger than them.
And don't worry, I'm fundamentally against Democrats on other issues.
>>677157274
I'm not disagreeing with you, as I'm sure the courts and juries would lay on as many charges as they can, but how in the *fuck* is that grooming?
>>677158045
>On the topic of child porn, however
Charging teens for creating it for selfies is PLAIN FUCKING RETARDED.
Actual child porn where young children are forced to have sex with other children or adults is fucked up.
I think the definition of said materials needs to be brought into the 21st century.
>>677143493
For real blud
>>677158343
I aint reading all that shit nigga
>>677154756
I'm on and off with this. The only thing that I or anyone else can speak from is personal experience, obviously, but my carnal needs haven't really changed since I was 14-15. I had sex with females that were my age, a little older and quite a bit older. It makes a case for itself, really. I don't condone it, but which sounds more appealing - a fresh, vibrant young girl, or an exhausted older woman?
Not claiming to have the answers, I just shrug at stuff like this and keep livin my life.
>>677142483
whos the cute girl is she legal
>>677158981
tl:dr
americunts have shit age restrictions
>>677158045
>>677158526 , here.
I completely agree with you. I don't think there should even be a penalty for pictures where girls are taking selfies or where they're in some video chat room. It was their decision to do those actions.
But, playing the devils advocate, perhaps the law believes that children aren't responsible for their own decisions until they reach a legal age where their competency is imputed into the law. In other words, above-aged males should know better than to ask underaged girls for naked videos/photos of themselves, whereas young children don't know any better/ are more coerced by peer pressures such that their not competent enough to make rational decisions.
>>677158343
>how in the *fuck* is that grooming?
good question, but the fear mongering, and media hype adds to this frenzy.
harsher and harsher laws are getting passed, making more things sexual offenses (not less), and no politician worth his salt would EVER suggest "hey man, this is getting a bit out of hand, let's dial it back a bit" because anyone running against them in an upcoming election would destroy them with that, saying that they are "soft on pedophiles". It's going to get much more severe before it can start to go back to something rational.
The good news is that WE ARE DISCUSSING THIS.
That's awesome.
It starts off as something you do in the dark, it's bad, no one likes you.. then gradually people understand and even empathize with you, then people start discussing it, trying it for themselves, start really learning about it.. then society reaps the benefits of a more knowledgeable, well informed populace.
It only gets better from here /b/rothers
Why are so many people posting their real names today?
>>677159395
only trump can make america great again
>>677159552
they want to talk openly about this topic.
it's called courage.
>>677158045
>>677158526
agreed to most of ur comment
also as example of what u said in some europe countries u cant get charged wth statutory rape just cuz ur 18, courts take in consideration the age gap and the fact that there may been a relationship, consent etc
instead in the USA if u have a 17 or 16yrs old gf and u turn 18 ur gf´s parents cant get u in jail charged wth statutory rape and u get listed as sexual ofender basically no mater what, u can also get in jail for fucking a minor that lied to u about her age.. usa is kinda fucked up
>>677159348
>But, playing the devils advocate,
I am saying when a teenager takes a selfie, and is charged for "production and distribution of child porn".
Who's the victim? The state is believe it or not, and the teen gets charged and put on the sex offender registry.
This is seriously fucked up, and is in an entire different league than lester taking the neighborhood kids into this basement and filming them. These are not the same thing, but under the law they are.
>>677159660
tru
>>677157388
Nothing involving niggers should be measured x/100 unless it's the number of their illegitimate children.
>>677142483
>Harry Moss
Kek
>>677158526
>I think the definition of said materials needs to be brought into the 21st century.
This is the fundamental problem with a lot of these discussions. People foaming at the mouth to "PROTECT KIDS AND KILL ALL PEDOPHILES" are referring to literal pedophiles who have sex with literal children, ie ~13 and under. "KILL ALL CHILD FUCKERS" because that's what they think of when they hear the word pedophile.
People supporting a lowering of the age of consent, changing the (fucking backwards) laws about "child" pornography, are in 99 cases out of 100, not talking about children. They are talking about 16, 17 year olds who are clearly sexually mature and capable of making decisions. These discussions usually can't get anywhere because of this complete disconnect between righteous guardians of children and people who understand biology and are capable of entertaining contrarian ideas.
>>677158981
this guy: >>677159341
>>677159395
I agree with you there. That's part of what motivates me toward success, so once I've made my money I can say to my (hopefully many) followers: "hey guys this whole hypersensitivity about sexuality in the United States is really ruining a lot of lives. Calm down."
Just to see the white-hot rage filled, totally impotent responses would be lovely. I can already see a few people ITT who are just foaming at the mouth yelling "STOP THINKING THINGS I DON'T LIKE!!!!!"
>>677159543
That's the way it seems, at least.
>>677159873
>u can also get in jail for fucking a minor that lied to u about her age
This is the thing I'm most worried about personally. Because I know for a fact that if you literally see her ID and it says she's 18 or 19, and she tells you she's 18 or 19, and every verifiable piece of information you have about her says that she's 18 or 19, the courts will just say "LOL she's underage! Your life is over now because you did something that literally didn't hurt anyone and caused no damage."
>>677159660
Trump? America is so fucked. Why can't they be more like Canada.
>>677159873
Well, to be frank, each state has its own laws. I'm only citing from the federal statute. For example, in Florida, we have a "Romeo and Juliet" law which allows someone who is 23 to legally have sex with a 16 year old. So there are exceptions.
>>677159948
I agree that its definitely not a good result when a teenager, at the behest of her own thought processes or of someone in her age groups' coercion, takes a photo of themselves and is put on the sex offender registry.
But this is a reason why I push so much for more state power as opposed to federal power. The only reason this would be a federal case (and as such subject to stricter statutory requirements) is because sending a picture utilizes cell phone towers and/or internet lines which run intrastate this allows congress, through the commerce clause, to regulate solely.
>>677159330
>is she legal
How can you miss the point this fucking hard?
>>677143984
NOT IN LIKE HALF THE WORLD FAGGGGOTTTT :DDDDDDDDDDDD
>>677157997
I'm not proud I'm celibate. I was just stating a fact.
There's more than the fear of punishment holding me back.
I have a conscience.
I wouldn't be able to live with myself should I act on my urges.
So I don't. Simple as that really.
This is my struggle and I own that.
I refuse to make another suffer for something that's plaguing me.
I know what I am.
The only reason I don't admit it is because of the fact that
merely having an attraction to children is no different than raping children in the eyes of society.
This is not a cry for pity. It's a cry for sanity.
A plea that maybe we can have a serious discussion about pedophilia,
without illiterate retards calling us latent rapists.
>>677142483
Topbabe.in have fun reporting it to the fbi moralfags
>>677159948
ur right its fucked up but its kinda simple in my opinion
since revenge porn is a crime now... that means the law understands selfies, naked pics vids etc form part of normal relationships and are shared even wth friends etc; now, in that case nobody should be charged for a selfie given to u by anybody, if u can prove it was given to u willingly.
however u should be charged if u distribute it and anyway tho
else u can take an extreme aproach (like usa always does) and charge the kid who took it for creating cp and distribution, the parents since they are th children´s legal wards, the kid or adult that got it wth posesion of cp algong wth the kids legal wards as well and anybody who may have touch it seen it or come close to the kids phones... everybody except the prosecutor and the fbi agents who fapped lloking at the pictures
>>677161851
>merely having an attraction to children is no different than raping children in the eyes of society.
Mind rape
April fools!
Anyways, its perfectly legal to fap to loli in America. So that's your guilt-free way out, if you need one.
>>677163389
>cartoons
>fapping
>>677163616
what are you fucking gay
>>677163696
i like real females or males (bifag here).
not shota, loli, or traps. couldn't even get it up to that shit if i tried.
>>677163389
>h
In some states it is. Make sure you're in the right one.
Test
>>677161851
well sir my point been.. its ok u can like whatever u want dude.. its ok i dont even mind unless u touch my kids
im just tired of this its not fair boo-hoo bs asking for sympathy and shit...
btw now u talking real shit, i can only imagine it may be a struggle, again take a page from the other pedoanon´s book he seems to have a happy life.. hope u can overcome the struggle too
>finally i apologize if a was very rude, i kinda got triggered... again i hate those arguments asking for sympathy, saying society this and that.. i guess for me things are what they are and thats basically it dont mask it or anything
for real good luck wth the struggle man and carefull when u watch cp Tor is now very vulnerable (one would hope the fbi let u guys fap alone in peace)
-Sincerely, yours:
a "illiterate retard calling us latent rapists"
>>677164316
At least post a short comment or reply, you dip.
>>677164267
It doesn't matter what state does or doesn't, anon. After Ashcroft was decided by the supreme court you have to have an actual picture of a minor to be convicted.
All you'd have to do if arrested under state law is to place venue in federal court or appeal to the same.
>>677164988
u sure? like a physical picture? cuz youtubers been getting raped by jamal cuz they haad pics of grill that got flrty wth em
That is not paedophilia, that is love for retardeds.
What the fuck happens in her brain? xD
>>677164988
Most people can't afford that.
It would go to county level first, then superior court, then state supreme court, then fed. By then most of you would be broke, and just take the plea agreement or get stuck with the lower court's ruling.
So federal won't usually matter in these cases where the state wants to prosecute someone for loli.
>>677142483
>>677145715
>>677153999
I banged a 15 year old and she was much more rough and ready than my currently 23 year old gf
>>677149930
I'm the only one who thinks that girl have psiko problems?
>>677165391
No, a digital image of an actual child will get you arrested.
>>677165523
You don't have to exhaust all options if you file for removal to federal court under original jurisdiction. As long as the claim can be properly brought under a federal statute this move is proper under 28 USC sections 1441(a) and 1332.
This is why you need a good attorney lol.
>>677166266
retards dat btch is old google victoria justice
shes one of Dan the man´s btches, like miranda cosgrove
>>677144046
Nope he said inb4. Post doesn't count sorry fag.
>>677165523
Got it in one. I really hope nobody here is so deluded to think that some public pretender is going to get you off on a loli charge, should you be charged.
You got dosh? yeah, you might be alright. Welcome to the American justice system. I love my country, and I believe in capitalism, but fuck, man...
>>677166439
You are virgin and you know it.
>>677166598
That's not how inb4 works, you fucking sped.
>>677166600
>>677166888
also checked
>>677166888
right back at ya
