Seriously guys, what in God's name did Hilary do to get all the flak she gets. All I hear is "Warmongering!" "Criminal!" But no one ever explains this shit. She used her personal computer for sending private emails, sure it was stupid but who the hell doesnt do something retarded and goes "Oops?" When it's over? We all fuck up big, get over it, it doesnt mean you arnt a good leader. So either tell me why she is so bad or shut up.
That's what I thought.
>>695875110
Why even elect a president if we're just going to alternate between 2 rich families with an occasional token minority and then bitch about how the status quo is unnaceptable. Appearantly the status quo is fine. Just give me a god emperor already and stop trying to squeeze loosh out of me every 2 years
Instead of waiting for someone to explain it to you, like a small child, do some of your own research and find out for yourself. There are TONS of things. I'm surprised she can even run. So just put on your big-boy shoes and do some research.
>>695875110
have you been living under a fucking rock the last 16yrs? The dumb bitch has never spoken a true word in her life. As a government official who is involved in top secret ops and top secret government agencies the last thing you do is have and pass information over an unsecured network. Her server was vulnerable to easy attacks and therefore top secret info could have been easily accessed. The worst part of it all is she lied about it.
She also changes her views when it suits the American populous. We have no clue what she actually stands for because she is constantly changing her stance on things.
She is the root of all evil in government!
Translation "I lack the willpower and intelligence to do research and come up with my own educated decision. /b/ what do you think?" Fuck off
Well for one she got a child rapist off the hook
>>695875110
search up hillary benghazi, bank and saudi donations, and middle eastern war to learn about her
>>695876453
Literally her job as a defense attorney.
So Far everyone is doing exactly what I said.. Just saying shit without explaining anything. Stop being fucking sheep.
Honduras is an easy place to start
>>695875384
pretty bad when you answer your own thread three minutes after you start it.
Those emails aren't fucking office gossip. Its top secret files and emails.They literally said if anyone else did this they would be convicted. She is the only nominee in history that committed a federal offence. If she can't be expected to handle sensitive information how can she handle the presidency. She fucking lied about it FFS
>>695876850
OK, started a coup in Honduras, resulting in a brutal period of political killings
>>695875110
>used her personal computer for private emails
nigger she used her personal computer and a private, unsecured server to send and receive emails involving information that was classified or more. Not just private, stuff that affects our national security. That's treason, and she doesn't even get a slap on the wrist.
>>695875110
She has flip flopped on literally every policy in the past 12 years just to try and get public opinion ratings up. She has funded her campaign using illegal money from her foundation. She has flat out lied about multiple things (Where she stood on policy in the 90's, the whole email fiasco she kept claiming she never did it over and over again, there was no "oops?") when what she originally said was also on TV and can just be watched again and compared.
She's a two faced fucking idiot that will say literally anything to get elected, anyone who has been about to whistle blow on the clinton foundation or the DMC concerning her has miraculously turned up dead before going on trial. She also signed off on the assassination of Gaddafi and the destabilization of Libya.
>>695877275
>not even a slap on the wrist
The dude called her grossly negligent. That alone should cost her the election.
>>695877275
Jfk reloaded.gif.
Anyone? Where are the true americans at?
She's a woman.
Do you not watch the news?
https://youtu.be/wbkS26PX4rc
>>695876757
wait until you're the victim. actually it was her candor that bothers people.
>Coup In Honduras
>Syria destabilization
>Libya destabilization
>Bombings in Yemen
>Boots on ground in Somalia
>Denies security to Benghazi despite evidence it's about to be attacked for some reason
>Special forces in Ukraine
All under her direction. Hillary is literally a warhawk.
Well OP did we spell it out for your ass yet?
>>695877451
It's not going to. Nothing short of actual criminal charges is going to stop Hillary from being a viable candidate in the up coming election.
>>695878229
Thanks, /pol/
>>695877451
against a literal retard lmao no
>>695878628
Trump is probably the best thing that could happen to you. He will fuck everything up so badly that it will force political reformations
>>695876850
Stop being a fucking sheep yourself and RESEARCH. The information is out there you lazy prick.
>>695875110
How much did you get paid for this post?
>>695878229
>got him off on a technicality
Prosecution shouldn't have let that technicality exist. I don't agree with the whole laughing bit, but it's the defense attorney's job to do their damnedest to protect the rights of the accused and, well, defend the defendant. If she did any less she wouldn't have been doing her job.
>>695878902
Tree fiddy.
She flipflops and lies about her previous stances on every fucking issue you can imagine, from gay marriage, to the Iraq war, to illegal immigration, the Transpacfiic Trade Partnership. Every controversial thing Trump supports, she has supported in the past, and suddenly doesn't because she'd like to gain more votes.
But throughout her entire career she has always been funded by wealthyass donors, usually Saudis now.
Despite taking millions in bribes from nations that practically enslave women, she calls herself some champion of women, when in reality has done absolutely nothing but defended rapists in court and threatening the women who her husband has slept with.
She had 30,000 emails, 110 of which were classified, 8 of which were top secret. She was fully aware of the security breach here, and anyone could've broken in if they were at the right place at the right time. Even if she somehow didn't realize that she fucked up, that doesn't change a thing. I have little doubt that foreigners were able to go through all her shit and can do whatever they want with it in the case she gets presidency. The entire situation she had with the FBI is fishy as all hell, we spend an ungodly amount of time on ALL cases to be sure we have them nailed to the wall, we never make a case we know we can lose, and we did the same exact thing here, only we decided to do nothing about it.
Anyways, having spoke with a guy in the Secret Service myself, I can tell you she treats people in general like absolute garbage, she kicks and screams, and left the fucking White House trashed when she was made to leave, also tried to steal 300k+ worth of furniture from the place. This is all public info.
She's a fucking child, she fucks up and lies about it despite all evidence. She knows she can get away with it and she has.
But hey, at least she isn't as bad as Trump, that guys gonna start World War 3. You guys are fucking morons, fuck all of you.
>>695878779
Kek. Hilarious worst case scenario.
>>695876757
Wasn't her job to laugh about it afterwards.
OP is either an idiot or a troll.
Dear OP: If YOU had a server in your basement with shitloads of official government secrets and emails having to do with the military and all kinds of shit- what do you think would happen to you?
Do you think you would be running for President?
Or do you think you might very well be in jail for a long long time?
Protip: You would be in jail and NOT running for President, kust so you know you dumb fag.
>>695879286
You do realize that it doesn't matter if you've gone to jail to run for president right? The Constitution only requires you be 35 or older and be born or naturalized in us and lived here for 14 yrs.
>>695879475
Yep - a guy from jail got the republican ticket back in the 1870s I think.
>>695875110
I dont care
>>695878229
>this would actually be impactful if actual sources were given instead of hurr durr muh red pill
>>695876334
Aside from the email controversy it sounds like you're describing Trump. I know just because you don't like her doesn't mean you like trump, I just feel like we are genuinely fucked this year. Can we just have no president for a while?
>>695875110
> championed nafta killing tons of jobs
> lied about supporting it
> champions TPP which will do the same thing on a greater scale
> led democrats in congress to support the iraq war when they could have blocked it otherwise
> is therefore partly responsible for killing millions of people and the current ISIL/refugee problem
> lies about literally everything
> was staunchly against gays until 2012 when it was cool
> when she appears on local tv she panders to the regional audience, on national TV she just never picks a side
> fully funded by huge corporate interests
> clinton foundation corrupt as fuck
> id be in jail if i treated classified the way she does
> she acts above the law
I can go on for hours, but she is the worst human being in this country.
>>695875110
in a nutshell:
She has admitted she admires kissinger, and considers him her mentor. This is the kind of thinking that was responsible for the worst parts of american cold-war foreign policy.
It was complicit in the genocide of east timor
it was responsible for the toppling of the democraticly elected government of Chile in 1973.
It was responsible for the arms for hostages bullshit in Iran.
She represents a return to fucking up shit in other countries for profit. Including genocide.
Shes funded by the Saudis etc to the tune of 80 million dollars (50 from saudi alone).
Domesticly shes funded by big business.
Oh and then theres bengazi and the email thing, but the warmonger accusation is mostly due to her claiming to want to behave like kissinger.
>>695875110
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk
Section (f)
There's your answer
The media doesn't talk about her "experience," only that she has it. Her time as Secretary of State was a disaster. Americans don't know that the rest of the world exists, so they overlook such things as turning Libya from Africa's richest nation into a failed state because she wanted a trophy for her campaign (which is now a blemish instead).
She is a war criminal, and we'll get more war with her as president. Maybe war with Putin if Ukraine is any indication. WWIII, here we come!
>>695875110
Look up Clinton Foundation Uranium
Look up Clinton Foundation in general you fucking retard
>>695880451
She is unironically the biggest neoconservative running. She is also the most corrupt.
The Clintons really took corruption to the next level.
Come on OP you were talking all that shit a second ago. No more sheeple talk?
Politics is dirty business and if you've been doing it for as long as her, you're gonna get dirty. You're gonna have to make friends with people you don't like and you're gonna get shit all over at one point or other.
Hillary is an extremely flawed candidate but I think alot of it has to do with how long she's been knee deep in American politics. With that experience comes shit stains but also am uncanny ability to maneuver in that world. You have to almost admire how resilient she has been despite years and years of the Republicans trying to take her down without success. There are tons of reasons that a person may not vote for her but I personally can't think of one specific thing she's done to make me belive that she would not have the interests of the country in her mind. I could at least say that she knows how to play the game at least better than anyone out there and that counts for something.
Still I'm not voting for her, I'll probably vote Gary Johnson. However I think the Republicans need to move on from their tiresome exercises in bashing her every chance they get and start providing solutions to problems.
>>695881385
You are so detached from reality, it's stunning. I guess there are people who really do believe this though.
>>695881385
I'm voting for GJ too
>>695881911
Attacking the person rather than the argument. Great logic fag
>>695881918
Waste. I'm voting for less wars and less deals like TTP and other legislation our buddies in the big banks want to screw our middle class some more.
Trump is controversial and the corporate media is doing a good job tarring his name, but he has the right core ideas in mind. And he can actually win too.
>>695882173
The Clintons only care about money and power, m8. They give no fucks about the peasants. They are glorified mafia and puppets for the banks and foreign interests like the Saudis.
>>695882708
this
they are just puppets for all the worst people
>>695876334
lets all overlook the fact that it was actually safer then the official government server, which got hacked (her server was never compromised).
=
>>695875110
When you're putting government top secrets and lives at risk, it's a bit different then "Oops, I accidentally shared that picture that had a poop in a toilet in the background!"
Then, she's got the audacity to say stupid shit like, "What with a rag?" after she was asked if she wiped the servers. Bitch knew what they meant and tried to play it off like some stupid joke because she knew she was in the wrong and didn't want to end up in jail over breaking the very easy to follow law.
>>695881385
You're right. Politics is dirty. Look at all the shit it's gotten us with a democratic majority. Borderline race wars.
Don't get me wrong, republicans can suck a fat one too. Too many of them focused on anti abortion, anti gay rights, etc.
Both sides need to be held accountable for the shit we're in. Hillary and Trump are part of the problem, not the solution.
>>695875110
>We all fuck up big
this shouldnt happen until they are already the president.
hillary is simply incompetent.
>>695875110
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Su53RUx3Lw&index=1&list=LL8HKI_AR5y3PtpCEBazRHHA
>>695876960
They literally said nothing of the sort. They said the person ~may~ be fired from an organization. Big difference
>>695883357
Yes it was actually
http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2016/06/15/what-russias-dnc-hack-tells-us-about-hillary-clintons-private-email-server/#2b83513d3b2a
>>695878229
The third item (which is where I bothered to stop reading) is the worst type of hearsay imaginable.
Shes a liar! (according to unsorced, unvalidated, unmentioned people who supposedly "know" her). If thats one of the leading points in the list it is not worth reading.
>>695883486
I do believe that's perjury. Oh well, she's royalty, what can we do?
>>695878779
This. I'll feel disgusted voting for a berlusconi/Mussolini/hitler but I'll take hitler over Mao any day. At least people can see hitler or trump for what he really is. His nomination is the death ell of the republicans, but it won't be the death Nell of democrats till he beats Hillary at her rigged election. In the mean time I'm keeping my guns and ammo close
>>695883758
Totally absolved!
HAHAHAHAHA fucking shit, you americans are a bunch of idiots that like to think youre first world
On one side we have a woman whos responsible for a lot of wars and only cares about money and power. Literally the embodiement of imperialism.
On the otherside we have a rich ass extravagant old man born in a golden nest who only knows how to spout conservative bullshit and is going to cause world war 3
Situate yourselves, fatasses
>>695883689
The article mention nothing of the sort. This about DNC servers getting hacked. So no, actually, it wasn't.
>>695884066
Claims Require Evidence!
>>695883858
not voting her ffs
>>695884168
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/07/us/hillary-clintons-email-was-probably-hacked-experts-say.html?_r=0
>>695884128
Idgaf as long as my taxes don't go up tbh fam.
Then again, my life is pretty awesome and I don't give a shit about eurocuck politics or sandnigger shenanigans.
Hey Libtards,
My name is Mike, and I hate every single one if you. All if you are commie, nu-male, cucks who spend every second of their day jerking it to Hillary. You are everything wrong with America. Honestly have you ever gotten any pussy? I mean, I guess you can fuck your gf after she's done taking Jamal's dick, but that's a whole new level of beta. That's even worse than being a fag. Don't be a stranger. Just hit me with your best shot. I'm pretty much perfect. I'm a famous rapper, and I'm fucking loaded. What do you do, other than "protest about black people getting shot"? I also have shit tons of drugs that I do all the time, and I fuck banging hot bitches (This girl just blew me; Shit was SO cash). You are all faggots who should just kill yourselves. Thanks for listening. Trump 2016.
Pic Related: It's me and my bitch.
>>695884421
Answer me a question, if you please.
If the two nominees are so bad, why didnt the americucks choose someone better when they actually had the chance?
>>695884128
>says the one living in a United states protectorate
>>695884261
You mean the evidence that she was negligent in the eyes of the law?
See >>695880588
>>695884128
You're a moron if you think Trump is more likely to cause a war than Hillary.
Trump wants to speak with world leaders and knows who can and cannot be messed with, meanwhile Hillary has already declared her intentions to start fights with Russia.
>>695884128
Trump's going to start WWIII because he's le loudmouth businessman, pls. I'm more worried about Clinton antagonizing Putin and crossing the line into a thermonuclear exchange.
Americans have no idea how close we were to this when she was Secretary of State.
Bitch got cucked.
>>695884349
Wheres the proof? Do you have any? No? This article throws hypotheticals around like confetti at a ticker tape parade.
Move the fuck on, fight on some real issues if you want. Attack her flip flopping on trade agreements, attack her voting record as a politician, hell attack her forgiving bill and being a cuck.
But the more you push this "probably, maybe, could be, might be" nonsense the more you sound like a fucking moron.
>>695875827
i did my research! hillary clinton has never been charged with any crime despite republicans making finding clinton crime the top priority of congress 1992-2000 and 2012-2016!
>>695884588
Good question. Because Shillary was all but guaranteed the nomination when Obama went into office through deals and underhanded tactics.
Trump is fueled by a combination of unlimited free media coverage, retards who think he's going to "change" the system, and the stupidity of the general population.
I didn't vote.
>>695884617
>https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793#.ViBujn6rSUk
Yep, and the FBI determined she didn't meet the criteria.
So that means guilty?
>>695884128
And your country will be completely brown by 2050
>>695884914
Amazing!
>>695884979
The FBI added some bullshit that there was no intent. Intent is not a factor in the written law.
>>695884698
>>695884641
Sorry but im not american so i cant be bothered with analysing the two candidates profusely. Anyways, i only thought that because the media portrays him as the most radical while hillary is portrayed as the liberal faggy one. I understant that hillary is a snake but i still think that if trump is ellected he will cause a lot of shit in and outside of the us. Hes a republican after all.
>>695884609
I think youre wrong buddy
>>695875110
FBI director said what she did would have lead to prosecution for anyone else. It was a criminal offense, but he decided not to send it to the AG office because she's a presidential candidate and a Clinton.
Favoritism and cronyism, in the face of criminal neglect.
Plus all the deaths she's associated with.
>>695885018
Niggamy country is already brown
But guess what? There are no muslims and jews here and our country is not the one with the biggest jewish population outside israel!
Oh, and no bombings since like forever.
>>695875110
>never been charged
>That doesn't mean that she and Bilboe didn't commit those crimes.
>It just means that, while Bilboe was governor of Arkansas he had enough power behind him to get away with all the shit they did, there.
>WHITEWATER!
Oh, and that's the fucking weakest argument I've seen in months!
>Try harder, faggot!
>>695885185
>Hes a republican after all.
Means nothing. He made a hostile takeover of the GOP. His foreign policy has been described as "isolationist" (as if that's a bad thing). Hillary is much more of the neoconservative war hawk stereotype you're referring to.
>>695876334
literally said nothing
one long paragraph of nothing
no evidence, no examples, no sources
this is exactly what OP was talking about
you'll literally parrot stale FOX talking points rather than make any kind of reality-supported statement
Hillary's campaign is posting on /b/. I've seen a thread like this once a day every week. This is hilarious.
>>695885544
I know that the two parties have switched sides lots of times during history but right now shouldnt the republicans be the war mongering ones and the democratics the faggots?
>>695885084
So you know better then the fbi?
>>695884588
Because the democratic primary was littered with voting fraud.
>>695876453
>using "reasonable doubt was actually done" as an argument against anything
fuck you Hilary chill.
>>695885185
There's your problem. Do not trust the media. They propagate stories that trump is racist, sexist, divisive, etc. and then give no actual evidence. Or they simplify his words to make them mean entirely different things, such as his taking his statements about *illegal* immigration and applying it to all immigration, or his views on *radical* Islam onto all (partially American) Muslims. It's dishonest and disgusting that these people are supposed to "inform" us. Hillary has done far, far, worse things than Trump and has gotten away with every single of them. The Email thing was just scratching the surface.
Trump is not a Republican, at least in the commonly thought of sense. He is a nationalist that's pretty moderate with his political views.
>>695876724
>hillary benghazi
Whoops, you just lost all credibility right there
>>695885338
>They literally said nothing of the sort. They said the person ~may~ be fired from an organization. Big difference
>>695876960
Remember when Sara Palin did literally the exact same thing? And actually got hacked and leaked goverment data?
And no charges were filed?
When republicans biggest problem is blantently working against an appointed democrat, you know we are fucked. All i ever hear republicans say is we need to get rid of democrats. Fucking cry babies. Go back to your inbred states fucking conservstive hillbillies
>>695885762
Did I say that? I'm showing you a written law. And that there seems to be a neglect of following this law. There's precedence for this type of crime, but for some reason Comey decided to not push it further. Take that how you will. Stop ignoring the facts though.
>>695876757
She did it well. Saying the girl asked for it. Pretty effective obviously.
>>695878012
>Standard US government foreign policy for decades now
>only house republicans ever blocked security for embassies
I wont deny she's a warhawk but wow youre dumb
>>695885731
That's a strange question. Both parties engage in "stabilization" to maintain the American hegemony, which isn't a passive process. The Republicans are just footing the bill for it because Iraq was such a conspicuous disaster. Obama, being pretty much in complete control of the media, has been able to be more quiet about our imperialistic projects.
Then Trump comes in and says, Let's cut back on NATO and other projects, we can't afford it. So, basically, no more American empire play.
The establishment is going nuts, of course.
>>695886079
Palin wasn't secretary of state. If she did in fact leak data then yes, she should have been held accountable for it.
>>695886198
The facts are the FBI did not find that she broke the law. Not that she broke your interpretation of the law. Stop ignoring the facts.
>>695879286
Protip: unfortunately the laws that govern federally appointrd members dont apply to common citizens. Besides, i bet the fucking lunch menu at the pentagon is "classified". That doesnt make it a threat to national security, fucking faggot. Wait til your cuck boy ttump sells us off to russia while trying to reconfigure the economics structure into a business structure. Not to mention trump plans on giving all of his major duties to his VP. What a fucking pussy. I bet youre already on your fucking knees, mouth wide open, waiting anxiously for trump to shit in your mouth. Go Fucking Kill Yourself You Fucking Bigot Moron
>>695886641
Wow. If you're the type of person that's voting for Hillary, then I fear the direction this country will take.
Not a single thing you said in the post was coherent or true.
>>695886578
It's not my interpretation. It's written. It's there. It's law. You're either trying too hard to troll or you have a severe case of cognitive dissonance.
>>695886641
You forgot to cite the Tumblr posts where you got your facts.
>>695886457
>Obama, being pretty much in complete control of the media, has been able to be more quiet about our imperialistic projects.
An example of this would be the refugee crisis, which is a direct result of Obama/Clinton's foreign policy obsession with taking out Bashar al-Assad.
>>695875110
Maybe you should start to do some research on your own, you lazy fuck
>>695887006
Meant to add: And yet Obama doesn't get any blame for it in the media.
>>695885762
it doesn't matter what him or the FBI thinks. The law is the law.
>>695886888
Trips confirms.
>>695886641
You Type Like A Shitskin. You Have To Go Back.
>>695885870
daily reminder that trump never got anyone killed.
>>695886787
So we circle back to you know better then the FBI.
>>695886079
remember when Nixon almost got impeached over 30 minutes of deleted audio recordings?
>>695887363
Take your meds
>>695887006
sure they are bad but putin is even worse, no reason to be ignorant
>>695887254
Yep, and according to the FBI, she didn't break the law.
>>695886115
>"I'll call them hillbillies again! That will show them!"
Hillary has literally no "selling point" other than she's a woman.
She runs that fucking ideal into the ground, making it a big fucking deal.
You want sources? Here, fucking take one: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xlDqptoRR28
You want equality? You want to be on par with everyone else? Then don't make a big deal out of your gender.
>>695887404
Same to you buddy, same to you
>>695886888
As someone told op. Do your own fucking research. Oh thats right, you listen to trump and est his bull shit up. Ya i hope yal realize how fucking retarded he is when he cant force mexico to pay for a wall. Thats coming out of every americans pockets. And he doesnt want us to hold up oir end with NATO. Citing, we will only intervene if our allies do their part. I cant wait to watch America fucking burn when every country turns their backs on us. Have fun sucking trumps dick, fsggot
>>695886578
so is cognitive dissonance a requirement for being a Hillary shill, or does it come with the job?
>>695887322
Spoiler: neither did Hillary
(except all the terrorists and dictators she's smoked)
I fucking hate women
But I also fucking hate rich born bigots
>>695886641
*$0.50 has been wired to your account*
>>695886780
Actually it is. Listen here moron. The only real republican that was at the RNC was Cruz. That man is standing up for his party and not bending over like paul ryan and the rest of you cucks have done. Just you wait, america is going to burn when trump start WW3. And i hopr i get to laugh in your face the moment it does
>>695887449
I'm not saying Putin is an angel, but the US kills far more people than Russia does. Saying he's "worse" is subjective, I suppose, but the death toll is not. The US does more to destabilize the Middle East than anybody. That's to be expected though since the US is the hegemon.
>>695887499
>You want equality? You want to be on par with everyone else? Then don't make a big deal out of being a second-class citizen, accept it quietly
....ok....
This
>>695887541
so how's the 8th grade going?
>>695887576
cog·ni·tive dis·so·nance
nounPSYCHOLOGY
the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change.
I believe my attitude thoughts, beliefs, and attitude is consistent. There are laws, there are authorities designate to enforce those laws when broken. The authority designated to enforce the law declared the laws were not broken.
The end.
You lose.
>>695883466
Are you retarded? The Republicans have held a house and Senate Majority the past few years and have done nothing at all with it except vote to repeal Obama care over 50 times. You talk about a party that that is completely useless at governing.
Also, there is no race war. I know trump and company want to scare you into thinking that there is but in reality there's only a few people in the fringe that really want to see it happen. America is not falling apart. There's alot to work on but it's not on the brink of war and mound collapse like the fear mongers want you to belive. Grow some balls anon and stop being afraid of the world. Go outside.
I love how all of the republicans are grtting butthurt. Sorry people. The FBI said she didnt do anythibg worth criminally charging her over. The nobodys claiming she did are just fsggots who cry when they dont get their way. I swear you fucking cucks need a good ass whoopin
"I want to be as good a president as Beyonce is a vocalist."
>>695885084
Fucking retard. Intent is written all over the statute.
>>695887840
Please spin that tired, outdated rhetoric somewhere else. Western women are in no way second-class citizens.
>>695875110
This would be a better question for /pol/. but if you want my opinion, she is a liar. She lied about things with that email and she knew that she lied. She said she didn't send classified information, she said she only used one devise, she lied about the entire thing. Clearly you don't know how to research so you will call me a faggot and ignore the truth. But you sir or madam are in fact the faggot. Go back to your basement you communist faggot
>>695887803
I hope at that point the missiles start flying to shut you the fuck up
>>695887840
>second-class
>woman
Choose one.
>>695887837
Thats a fairly big claim about us vs russia.
Both countries share pretty much equal value since the mideast has basically been a proxy was between russia and the us.
Also are you including domestic? The US doesn't make a habit of killing political dissidents, whereas in russia people have a habbit of becoming mysteriously irradiated.
Voting for Trump because I like the idea of A making America great again or B inadvertently starting WW3 as a response to some major attack that is coming. Which,if we sevive,will bump up humanity. Major leaps of advancement comes from the years after a war.
>>695887847
Benghazi Committee? Oh! You mean the manufactured controversy created as a petty, biased, and openly-acknowledged political tool, which in the end still found Hillary was completely vindicated in her handling of the Benghazi attack
>>695875110
Every scandal since 1973 has involved that bitch. Watergate, Whitewater are a couple. She gets away with murder ( Vince Foster ) like a crime boss wished he could...
>>695888547
The greatest advances in humanity have come during the greatest era of peace the world has ever known. War is NOT good for innovation.
>>695887499
Be happy /b/ro, they are gonna start making women sign up for the draft. True equality is almost here
>>695888516
The US is the one doing the destabilization. Putin wouldn't have been allowed to get away with something like Libya. He's on the defensive in the region, propping up Assad.
>>695888886
You are thinking far, faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaar too recent. The middle east hasn't been stable for a long time.
>>695888052
Not that anon, but I hope you're kidding.
In no way does your post demonstrate cognitive dissonance
>>695887499
>>695888795
I'm thoroughly convinced there's a difference in how much media and people in general will blame a woman for her actions vs a man, and Shillbot is the defining example. There is no fucking way a man could have her voting record and list of fuck ups and still make it this far.
Every single time she's attacked, media wants to play it like "You wouldn't make such a big deal if she was a man." It's a lie. She's only above water in this campaign because no media outlet wants to level all the fair criticism she deserves at her, because they'll be branded sexists by reflex and lose value. She would be rekd over how hard she's flipped on issues, how lax she was about National fucking Security, and how much money she's been bribed with for "speeches".
But she's a woman, she's got money going to the right places, she's rigged the DNC, and has a chance to "make little girls dreams come true, that a woman can be president!1!1!!!!!" [I'm a progressive, and it's really pathetic how easy it is to play the Left, just slap a woman, gay, or POC on it and they'll soak it up. It's as easy as getting the Right to vote against brown people.] So no one points out the obvious glaring flaws with her.
>>695889148
It's fairly stable when there's a strongman in power like Saddam or Qaddafi. Then what happens is that the US interferes and kills the strongman, the glue holding the various ethnicities together comes undone, and it descends into open tribal warfare and terrorism and chaos. Europe then gets a lot of new friends who bring the party over to them and even to us in the US.
>>695888422
I hope your mom gets cancer for raising filth like you. Bitch
>>695889677
The problem is it is "stable" because they are killing everyone, good bad or neutral, who they perceive as a threat (maybe not to Stalin levels, but they certainly aspire to Stalin levels).
>>695888800
>War is NOT good for innovation
Nope. War is what always has been advancing technology for centuries.
>>695889836
That's any country. Political dissidents and terrorists are imprisoned or killed in every country.
>>695875110
They've been trying to show she's bad for 25 years, and it's mostly been them crying shit-wolf.
>>695889966
Thats a bit of a myth. Preparing for war has driven innovation. The periods of actual war and reconstruction afterwards are terrible for innovation.
So what we want is a constant state of pre-war (which we are in)
>>695890100
>>695888474
>>695888394
The U.S. has refused to ratify the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women. The only countries in the United Nations who haven’t ratified CEDAW are: Iran, Palau, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Tonga, and the United States.
The U.S. has yet to pass an Equal Rights Amendment, and many groups actively campaign against it ever being passed
Women are over 50% of our population, yet continue the historic trend of underrepresentation in government
Remind me again how women are equal to men in the U.S. again? because anonymous "meninists" say so online?
>>695890217
You know you can do something criminal and not necessarily charged, right?
>>695885566
Soooo you think she is trustworthy? Kek
FBI: if anyone else did what hillary did they would be in jail. But since hillary sucked my dick and gave us all millions of dollars they're are no charges. But dont any of you normies get any ideas that you can do the same thing.
>>695888422
Seconded. Hope your mom gets cancer
>>695890424
Yes, but that's not what happened in this case.
>>695889702
Underage cruz cuck detected
>only this far cause she's a women
>votes in California went missing
> compulsive liar and flip-flopper
> doesn't want to help the little guy
> is basiaclly a republican
>>695885972
Trust me, your post will be ignored. It's funny how so many dumbasses here think the director of the FBI (a Republican, btw) got on national television and said "A terrible felony worth prison time was committed here, but we aren't going to lay charges because it's Hillary."
>>695890400
because there are no laws anywhere in the entire country that actively repress and prevent women from obtaining the same things men are allowed to have.
We're not going to pick them up and put them on top of the fucking mountain, they're going to have to climb there themselves. if you don't think that's fair then go live in one of those countries who has met your standard for equality, nigger.
>>695890400
>The U.S. has refused to ratify the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women. The only countries in the United Nations who haven’t ratified CEDAW are: Iran, Palau, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Tonga, and the United States.
Why is this necessary to end discrimination? We already have our own laws concerning discrimination based on sex.
>The U.S. has yet to pass an Equal Rights Amendment, and many groups actively campaign against it ever being passed
See above.
>Women are over 50% of our population, yet continue the historic trend of underrepresentation in government
Then more should run, nobody is stopping them. Equality of opportunity does not imply equality of outcome.
>Remind me again how women are equal to men in the U.S. again? because anonymous "meninists" say so online?
They live longer, more are in school, lower suicide and homocide rates, more lenient prison sentences, etc.
>>695885338
>>695885972
Also said no DA would ever pursue charges...
>>695875110
>>695888641
that's a fun spin you've put on it, too bad it's a fucking lie and hillary is a liar and a traitor to the united states you fucking scum
>>695890614
I disagree.
>Hillary Rodham Clinton has committed a felony. That is apparent from the facts and in the plain-language of the federal statute that prohibits "Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information", 18 U.S. Code § 793(e) and (f). This offense carries a potential penalty of ten years imprisonment.
>It's called a prima facie case: clear on the basis of known facts.
>It's up to prosecutorial discretion by the US Attorney as to what charges may be filed and when. Nonetheless, Mrs. Clinton is clearly chargeable for violation of federal law.
http://dailykos.com/story/2015/08/28/1416309/-Hillary-Clinton-s-Felony-The-federal-laws-violated-by-the-private-server
>>695891755
Daily Kos is wrong. They're not reading the statute correctly.
>>695875110
oh killary
>>695876334
>We have no clue what she actually stands for
Of course we do.
She stands for power, and having as much of it as possible.
>>695875110
god damn hillary
>>695892019
Explain.
>>695876960
Condoleezza rice admitted toddoing the same thing. Why aaren't you calling for her head too
>>695892433
who the fuck said I'm not
WHY DO FEMALE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS GET TO BREAK THE LAW WITH NO CONSEQUENCE?
JAIL, NOW
>>695892433
Fuck her too
>>695875110
Does /b/ remember when she left American contractors and soldiers to die?
Pepperidge farms remembers.
>>695891262
Are you joking or literally that ignorant?
No laws in the US repress women?
Its not like we have laws controlling women's access to contraceptives
then other laws regulating their reproductive choices
laws regulating their bodies (like Cleveland's antiboob law)
or their clothes (some towns require a permit to wear high heels)
or laws that allow women to be raped (marital rape is legal in many states; in N Carolina consent cant be rescinded once given)
not like any of those laws are established and exist, nope, not at al
>>695884486
Is that john Snow?
>>695878955
It was a pro-bono case she was asked to take if I'm not mistaken. As far as I know she took the case knowing full well he was guilty.
>>695876850
This is an 18 plus board, sweetie
>>695875110
You must be retarded. You'll fit right in on this board.
>>695893055
I looked up one of your claims:
>some towns require a permit to hear high heels
And I found out you were full of shit:
>Originally, the law, which prohibits heels taller than two inches, was intended to prevent against accidents on the city's cobblestone streets that might lead to injury (which might lead to lawsuits).
The law is only in one city and is designed for all large heels so people don't trip and sue the city. This would apply to men as well. I won't even bother looking into the others now.
http://www.complex.com/pop-culture/2012/06/the-10-most-ridiculous-united-states-laws/its-illegal-to-wear-high-heeled-shoes-in-carmel-ca-without-a-permit
>>695893055
how the fuck do any of those repess women?
what law restricts their access to contraceptives?
reproductive choices? you mean abortion? that's just as much the father's choice as it is the women's and the state has a right to influence a person's choice to end a potential life, dumb shit
GEE WILLICKERS WE'RE JUST A STEP AWAY FROM BEHEADING WOMEN IN THE STREET WHY WONT ANYONE STOP THIS MADNESS???? POOR SALLY COULDN'T BECOME PRESIDENT AND FLY A SPACE SHIP BECAUSE CLEVELAND WOULDN'T LET HER WALK AROUND WITH HER TITS EXPOSED THE HUMANITY OF IT ALL
kill yourself fuckhead
>>695891755
One of the elements of the s. 18(f) offense is gross negligence, which is a legal term with a specific meaning. The FBI found Hillary's actions couldn't plausibly be characterized as grossly negligent given the meaning of the term, and so failed to prosecute her.
What the FBI guy did say was that someone else who did what she did might face consequences, which I understood to mean an underling that did the same would probably be fired.
>>695885566
4chan wouldn't let me post the links ("spam"), pasted my post in a pastebin /MfCMLpQ4
There's A LOT more, especially her lies and misinformation during her senatorship, but I can't be assed to dig it all up for you, this must be enough to get you a head start on that psychopath.
>>695892278 see
>695894466
>>695891307
>Why is this (CEFDW) necessary to end discrimination? We have our own laws
because ours dont go far enough to ensure equality. Thats why the UN made the CEFDW, to bind member states to meaningful and effective gender reforms. Which the U.S refuses.
>(if women are underrepresented politically)...Then more should run, nobody is stopping them. Equality of opportunity does not imply equality of outcome
More women should run! Yes! How do we encourage that? Maybe with things like Hillary 2016 & other high-profile female political campaigns that dont shy away from gender?
> They live longer, more are in school, lower suicide and homocide rates, more lenient prison sentences, etc
And that proves women are equal to men in the U.S today!? Because women are biologically sturdier & show less lethality through the lifespan? No.
Or because positive discrimination can happen during sentencing for a crime? NEWSFLASH, in an equal world gender wouldnt factor in to sentencing at all. Sentencing disparity is a sign of women's unequal status, not proof theyre somehow "superequal"
>>695893055
Then stop complaining and fucking vote against those laws then. The longer you sit there, the longer it takes to get anything done.
>>695878052
Which is sad because he basically said
>nod nod, wink wink, don't make her president
>>695891737
a fun spin called the literal documented truth
>>695890217
The attorney general is in deep shit right now for doing nothing about it, just so you know.
>>695894812
you mean an Official™ Statement That Is Completely Neutral And Does Not Support Hillary At All (Seriously!)
>>695894655
>because ours dont go far enough to ensure equality
Give an example, please.
>>695894851
The attorney general isn't charging her because the FBI investigation found she did nothing criminal.
>>695894673
Oh yeah I forgot let me run out to the corner voting booth!
Are you literally retarded? I couldnt go vote against these things right now if I wanted to
>>695894466
>legal term with a specific meaning
It means:
>Intent to injure the U.S. or aid a foreign power is not required under Sec 793 (e) and (f). The mere fact of unauthorized removal or destruction of materials the official should have known were classified are all that is required for conviction under these parts of the Espionage Act. Hillary should have known.
Hillary falls under that designation.
>>695895256
Because she paid them not to
>>695894443
>reproductive choices? you mean abortion? that's just as much the father's choice as it is the women's and the state has a right to influence a person's choice to end a potential life, dumb shit
LOL. Forget potential lives, does the state have the right to force you to donate your kidney or your blood or a liver section to save, say, a 5 year old child's life?
Repeat after me, the government does not have the right to compel a person to be the biological mechanism by which another's life is sustained.
I researched for 5 minutes, found she sold uranium to Russia after a donation to the Clinton Foundation, that was enough for me so I stopped.
Im voting for whoever has the best chance to beat her, no matter who it is.
She is bought by other nations, she will continue to sell out the US.
>>695894655
>More women should run! Yes! How do we encourage that? Maybe with things like Hillary 2016 & other high-profile female political campaigns that dont shy away from gender?
No. Voting Hillary Clinton as a symbol of female achievements is retarded. The president doesn't have a gender, the president doesn't have a race. The only thing a president has are political stances and that's literally the only base that should be voted upon.
>And that proves women are equal to men in the U.S today!? Because women are biologically sturdier & show less lethality through the lifespan? No.
In fact it proves that women are pampered, not oppressed. Give any example of female oppression and I'll join any ridiculous feefee movement of your choice.
>Sentencing disparity is a sign of women's unequal status, not proof theyre somehow "superequal"
Sentencing inequality is a sign of women's special status, or as you call it "superequal".
>>695894169
So you looked up one of my claims
proved it was true
and that somehow invalidates my other claims?
>it affects all high heels so there!
If I made a law banning bras and brassierres, it would still be sexist even though some men wear bras for back support
She has no conviction or integrity. She changes her political positions based on polls like gay marriage more recently
>>695895431
Crying shitwolf again.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3yQqWNv91o
>>695895805
>>695894655
>because ours dont go far enough to ensure equality
According to whom and based on what?
>More women should run! Yes! How do we encourage that? Maybe with things like Hillary 2016 & other high-profile female political campaigns that dont shy away from gender?
This is an ignorant reason to vote for somebody. Very shallow.
>Because women are biologically sturdier & show less lethality through the lifespan?
No, it shows that at least in some way women have better standards of living than men and can be considered "better off" because of it.
>Sentencing disparity is a sign of women's unequal status, not proof theyre somehow "superequal"
It's really distasteful how you make women the victim here.
Nice trolling.
>>695875110
>Seriously guys, what in God's name did Hilary do to get all the flak she gets.
Well, for starters, basically everything she's done. She's trying to get Blacks wiped out. She wants them disarmed and killed by Mexicans.
The Blacks must be armed.
>>695895297
Then perhaps fucking contact your senator, the city mayor of those "oppressive law-filled" cities, hell, just contact someone who either has close ties to the board who brought it in the first place.
It's not just about waiting and waiting for a vote to come up, you lazy shit.
>>695875110
The GOP has investigated her relentlessly for 25 years, and they've never found anything criminal. They found foolish behavior with emails, however.
A couple of generations have now grown up with the background news saying that Hillary is being investigated for one thing or another. This shapes attitudes.
It's a good lesson for those willing to engage in ruthless politicking. If you want to ruin a strong adversary, just keep flinging accusations year after year.
People who fall for this, who believe Hillary is corrupt, have been manipulated by conservatives who would, among other things, shut down /b/.
>>695895256
Have you even read up on what happened?
She met with the Clintons only some three days before saying "Hilldawg dindu nuffin".
She's constantly lying about her inability to make comments on that (have you seen this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86Q-eYXle3c ? It's outrageous.). Just as much of a piece of shit as both the Clintons.
>>695895638
if you're a leech to society with no potential value for the rest of your life (retarded, disabled, unskilled female older than 40) then yeah the government should be able to harvest your organs and give them to more valuable individuals than yourself.
>>695895771
The law doesn't target women. There are plenty of men's boots that have 2+ heels.
The intention of the law is to keep people from tripping not to wear high heels. I also find it highly sexist that you think only women can wear high heels, by the way.
>>695879285
the laugh was added into the audio, it wasn't real.
>>695885338
The FBI director said that nobody would be prosecuted for what Hillary Clinton did, and that nobody else ever has been. If you believe that she got some special deal, you've been paying attention to conservatives, including smart conservatives who know better but find it valuable to mislead you.
>>695895771
>proved it was true
It's not a gendered issue, that's the point, you moron.
>>695896196
>if you're a leech to society with no potential value for the rest of your life (retarded, disabled, unskilled female older than 40) then yeah the government should be able to harvest your organs and give them to more valuable individuals than yourself.
This is what the psychopaths in the party of law, order, and small government believe.
>>695895771
I can guarantee that you'd fall flat on your fat ass if you tried wearing heels on a cobblestone street.
Once you try puling the whole "it's sexist because I skimmed the first page on a google search of 'sexist laws'", you don't have anywhere left to stand, especially if you're in heels.
>>695895204
Just one? ok. Women in the US are not mandated leave from work when they have s baby.
We're one of (I believe) about 5 countries that dont mandate maternity leave. Care to guess the others?
I'm a "moderate" Republican, as is my entire family (Voted for Bush x2, McCain and Romney) but I'll say it:
You're right. She's a deeply flawed candidate but she hasn't done anything that should disqualify her from the Presidency.
So we've done our best to stack the deck against her. Benghazi was a tragedy but not directly her fault (If it was we'd have nailed her for it). The shit that went down in Libya, Honduras, etc. was a mistake but there was nothing sinister behind it. And the emails were bullshit. It was poor judgement but she wasn't selling secrets - She was reckless but not criminal. She flip-flops and she's in bed with corporations - But politicians on both sides of the isle do this shit all the time. She's a shrill bitch but hardly the devil we've made her out to be.
The truth is she scares the hell out of us because we know she has a better than average chance of winning. We've had two terms of Obama and dread another 4 to 8 years of Democrats in the white house and we're desperate to stop her.
The only reason I'm writing any of this is because Donald Trump scares me. And he should scare all of you too. There's no telling what he'd do if he becomes President. He is NOT a Republican. He is NOT a Conservative. He's an egomaniac that will use the office for his own gain.
Imagine the executive orders coming down from President Trump?
He has no political experience at all and business is a different animal entirely. If he runs America like he ran Trump University we'll be just as bankrupt
I honesty dont know what to do. Voting for Clinton doesn't sit right with me but there's no way I'll be a part of turning the country over to a man that will run it like a dictator.
Go ahead and attack me, but it doesn't make any of what I've said less true. We needed a man like John Kasich but instead we gave a con-man the nomination.
>>695896939
Before presidency:
>She dindu nuffin!
After presidency:
>Oh, fuck! What have we done?!
>>695896862
How is that a gendered issue? Are you telling me that women should stay at home and have a family? Are you saying they should be forced into traditional gender rolls, you collossal mysogynist?
>>695896939
Gary johnson 2016
I'm a normal educated American male, and I am voting for Hillary Clinton. She will be an okay President. Not the best ever, but not as bad as the alternative. Even if 90% of this nonsense that the crazy people are shouting were true I would still vote for her. She is fiscally conservative and she has all the necessary connections to be a good head of state in a currently unstable world. It's really unnecessary to try to overthink everything. Her husband did a good job with the economy when he was President, and he will be a good adviser to her.
>>695896939
Trump doesn't scare me. I'm genuinely more afraid of Clinton. Her foreign policy has been reckless and has already had disastrous consequences for Europe and us.
>>695897244
It's a waste of a vote. Stop with that doofus already.
Too lazy to browse through the thread, but this is a good start: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wK2K5v5bm0Q
My own intuition tells me there's not an ounce of genuineness in her words. To me that's extremely off-putting.
>>695884914
It's like the system is broken or something! That's weird because that could never happen in our government!
>>695897470
So is kasich
>>695881385
>There are tons of reasons that a person may not vote for her but I personally can't think of one specific thing she's done to make me belive that she would not have the interests of the country in her mind.
She supports bringing hundreds of thousands of muslim "refugees" into America.
>>695878229
I don't see how that is in the country's best interest.
>>695884914
its almost as if she is protected
>>695897561
I can't stand Kasich.
>gosh, golly, gee, I'm just your average American ex-Lehman Brothers executive who had no hand in the 2008 financial crisis, nope, not me
>>695875110
She intentionally trafficked classified information. It's one thing if say a businessman is selling trade secrets but another if a poltician is trafficking dangerous information. In the businessman scenario the only loss risk is money. Hillary caused lives to be lost. That might not mean a lot to you internet edgelords but she directly killed people through her poor decision making. See bengahzi. She is a warmonger, as are most american politicians, including bernie sander, so she can't be entirely faulted for that. Warmongering is american culture in this day and age. Her biggist fault is her lack of honesty and dignity. She will lie to get people to like her, steal information, give it away, trade lives for popular outcomes. She's not just "warmongering" or "making bad decision", she is killing people. When you have the type of influence that she has you are no longer a regular person making regular mistakes. There are serious consequences to every action you take. If you lack the compassion for your citizens like she does then you are setting up a scenerio destined to cause strife on a large scale. What happens when her personal email gets hacked by iraq and the plans to move troops are revealed? IEDs are set up and American men die. I don't aprove of war but i also don't approve of using soldiers as pawns in a giant chess game. Her "personal accounts" would be much easier to hack by an outside source than a government server. She's a dangerous liar. That's why people hate her.
>>695897244
I am considering voting Libertarian. In fact he'd make a fine President - FAR better than either Clinton or Trump. But he has no real chance of winning so I would just be voting my conscience. I dunno, maybe that's enough.
>>695895739
>Voting Hillary Clinton as a symbol of female achievements is retarded.
I never said you should vote for Hillary because she's a woman. I said having gender as a salient aspect of her high-profile political campaign is actively going to encourage female participation in government. Can you read? Can you comprehend what you read?
>women are pampered, not oppressed
Pampering is oppressing, shitlord. When we treat women as oh-so-delicate frailties men must protect we're disempowering and objectifying them
>
Sentencing inequality is a sign of women's special status, or as you call it "superequal".
No. Sentencing inequality is another form of that "pampering" you claim makes women equal. Sentencing inequality is a femimist issue for this reason
>>695897824
The original guy i responded to with gary was in support of kasich
>>695897733
>She supports bringing hundreds of thousands of muslim "refugees" into America.
Does she? She supports bringing hundreds of thousands of high risk refugees without any screening or plan? She said that?
>>695897917
If gaty had a chance at winning, I'd vote him in a heart beat. Since he doesnt trump>hillary
>>695897969
>Pampering is oppressing, shitlord
Why then, are feminists pushing for less personal responsibility? One example being mandatory maternal leave, for example.
>Sentencing inequality is a femimist issue for this reason
It's a feminist issue in the sense that feminists defend the inequality by making up terms like "toxic masculinity" and similar bullshit. Stop misrepresenting.
>>695896939
I was unaware that candidates who commit treason are allowed to be the highest position of power in the united states.
>>695897226
lel retard troll
>>695897349
I do think Hillary would be a bad President but just not worse than anyone before her.
Trump is a total wildcard. He'll be the guy that gets insulted over some personal slight and declare war because his ego demands it. If nothing else he'll get caught on a hot mic saying Angela Merkel has nice tits or some damn thing.
>>695896862
Men aren't mandated paternity leave either.
Therefore, we're equal and it's not a gender issue.
>>695898713
>He'll be the guy that gets insulted over some personal slight and declare war because his ego demands it.
Trump is a wildcard, but this is just pure fantasy. That's not how it works. There have been plenty of narcissists in office. Heck, it's pretty much a prerequisite. Trump is just more flamboyant about it.
>>695898519
What treason?
And if you're unaware that treason isn't a disqualifier - that's on you.
Because it isn't'
"35 years of age, a resident "within the United States" for 14 years, and a "natural born Citizen"
That's it
>>695875110
I think the biggest problem for Hillary is that she spends most of her time defending herself from Trump attacks.
I'm not voting for Trump, but his strategy has been the better one for shaping all your feeble minds.
>>695883357
>the fact that it was actually safer
thats not how it works
lets say we have 2 doors. one is unlocked (shillarys door) and the other has a simple bolt (government door)
just because somebody finds and goes for the easy target of the government door, does not make shillarys door "safer"
>>695899108
I hope you're right. Really I do. But he's been incredibly reckless and there's no telling what he'd do. Oh, he might not be obvious about it but I dont put it past him to find some way to use his position to punish those that insult him personally.
>>695895875
>According to whom and based on what (are US laws not doing enough to ensure equality)?
According to the UN, the actual academics studying feminism and women's studies, women living in the US, and literally dozens of advocacy groups. Based on scientific research and comparative analysis
> at least in some way women have better standards of living than men and can be considered "better off" because of it
And thats not equality. In some ways (free food, shelter, the legal protections of being property) blacks were better off as slaves than as freemen after the Civil War.
That in no way implies it was more preferable to live as a slave.
>>695899991
>some way to use his position to punish those that insult him personally.
Yes, they all do that. Obama most assuredly does it too.
The reason why Trump comes off as reckless is because he says so many things off the cuff. He doesn't run his rhetoric through a committee or a test audience or whatever. That's part of his "authenticity" and appeal.
>>695899272
Because "treason" is debatable and changes in definition as time goes on.
Just being a communist was considered "treason", now you can openly hold communist views and be elected (in jurisdictions where that is approved)
>>695896746
>law regarding heels over 2 inches
>not a gendered issue
>in California 2016
I somehow still feel this law is mostly affecting women...
>>695899272
>What treason?
The treason they imagine her to have committed. They have so much irrational hatred for her that they feel she must've done something to justify it all. Leads them to cry shitwolf.
>>695898755
Men arent mandated paternity either, pleb
>>695875110
Amerifag here. The right wing has been demonizing Clinton since she was the First Lady and tried to get a health care plan together.
Take it from there. She's a no-nonsense woman who doesn't just take it and roll over.
That's enough to piss off any right-wing control freak misogynist Republican.
>>695898611
>lel retard troll
It's hard to be confronted about your low view of women, isn't it?
>>695900129
>According to the UN, the actual academics studying feminism and women's studies, women living in the US, and literally dozens of advocacy groups. Based on scientific research and comparative analysis
Yeah, I would like to see this so-called research. It's probably a 50 person sample survey if even that. The UN says a lot shit that I don't want implemented here. They're pretty much a rubber stamp for US foreign policy anyway.
>And thats not equality. In some ways (free food, shelter, the legal protections of being property) blacks were better off as slaves than as freemen after the Civil War.
I'm not convinced of that.
>>695900669
That's exactly what I said?
>>695899272
>>695900558
She stored classified state secrets on a private email server. If she wasn't a rich white vagina she would have been burned at the stake.
Where's the justice for General Petraues? He did the same thing.
>>695900538
>I somehow still feel this law is mostly affecting women...
So? Any regulation on, say, high income is mostly affecting men. Would you suggest that is a gendered issue, then?
>>695900989
>If I actually had proof that Clinton broke the law
>she'd be charged
fixed
>>695901240
... A small shooting in Germany doesn't match what Obama?
>>695901200
The FBI director admitted she was grossly negligent. If you think she wasn't complicit in what happened you're sticking your head in the sand.
It's a rampant thing actually. Many departments store stuff on private servers to avoid FOIA requests because the server is "at their sister's house." There was a recent court decision to over turn that precedent.
>>695901142
Absolutely, yes! Income inequality is absolutely a gendered issue
>>695901444
figure it out nigger
>>695901512
Show me where the FBI director charged Clinton with any criminal wrongdoing, or recommended any charges be filed.
I'll wait.
>>695900989
You said "men arent mandated paternity leave"
I responded "men arent mandated paternity"
Not the same thing at all
>>695900362
Know when I stopped believing in Trump?
When after he stood in front of us for a year declaring that he was self-funding his campaign to show that he would never be influenced by special interests - Then went back on his promise and started begging for money in the end anyway
>And dont even get me started on the hypocrisy of a BILLIONAIRE begging for money from MILLIONAIRES
I'm honestly doubting he's even a billionaire now. He has no political record for us to judge him on so we have to judge him based on his business record - But he refuses to release his tax records th way all Presidential candidtes have done for decades.
>Either he's not as rich as he claims or he's concerned because his records would show that he hasn't been contributing to veterans the way he's been bragging that he has. Either way he's a fraud.
>>695901659
>B-b-but she wasn't charged!
>The system is perfect, it never makes mistakes or is influenced by outside people!
Keep on licking that boot, lackey.
>>695901832
They're liable for child support.
>>695875110
With everything said in this thread (And this is coming from a Canadian), I feel like Hilary has no "presence".
She's fucking AWFUL to listen to. She's terrible at speeches.
At least Obama sounds like he can command and move a country. Hilary? Not at all.
Trump may be politically incorrect, but that's fine. He has a tough, blunt, and honest (For the most part) opinion/presence, and that's what people want right now, I think.
If Hilary gave a speech about literally anything, I picture her holding back a laugh because she either caused the issue, or thinks everything is a big joke that she can just use, abuse, and lie about.
>>695901832
yeah if they choose not to be the dad they just have to pay an incredible portion of their income for the next 18 years or face jail time and if they decide they want to see their kid after a few years that's just too fucking bad too
>>695901918
>asked to prove point
>fails
>calls anons "lackeys"
kek
>>695875110
>did Hilary do
-She's a she
-She's fat
-She's old
-She's a baby boomer
-She's a member of the wealthiest 1%
-She's the face of establishment politics
-She's a globalist neo-con
-She's of, by, and for the collusion between big govt and big corp
-She's a shameless liar
-She's the most non-transparent politician in history
-She has stroke-induced brain damage
-She's a cuckquean
She is literally every reason not to vote for a politician rolled into one person. But wait, there's more:
-She was fired from the Watergate investigation for lying and being unethical
-She lied about being named after Sir Edmund Hillary
-She lied throughout her Whitewater scandal
-She lied about taking "sniper fire" when visiting the Balkans during 90s
-She lied about Benghazi
-She lied throughout her email scandal and continues to lie about it
-She lied about being broke after leaving the White House
-She described blacks as being "super-predators"
-She hired a VP of Goldman-Sachs to be her 2016 campaign manager.
-She received millions of dollars from Goldman-Sachs for speaking engagements
-Her "charity" received tens of millions of dollars from Goldman-Sachs, JP Morgan, Citigroup, and UBS
-Her "charity" received tens of millions of dollars from China, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Yemen, Qatar, and the UAE
-She supported the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Turkey
-She voted for the Patriot Act twice
-She was "adamantly against illegal immigration" before she was for it
-She was opposed to gay marriage before she was for it
-She was a lawyer who defended a rapist and laughed at the plight of the 12 year old rape victim
-She approved the sale of US uranium to Russian nuclear corporations in exchange for millions of dollars in donations to her "charity"
-She gave out eight Secretary of State's Awards for Corporate Excellence, and seven were to corporations that donated millions to her "charity"
She is literally every reason not to vote for a politician rolled into one person.
>>695901832
Women aren't mandated maternity under that logic.
Ever heard of the "no questions" baby drop zones?
Free birth control?
Abortions?
Women have absolute control over their maternity.
>>695901895
>When after he stood in front of us for a year declaring that he was self-funding his campaign to show that he would never be influenced by special interests - Then went back on his promise and started begging for money in the end anyway
Nobody was assuming he would self-fund his general election campaign. That isn't really feasible.
>>695892433
You may want to read into that one a bit further. Rice used a personal email for NON-CLASSIFIED government business, as well as still used the private email on the official government server. Hillary used her own illegal server and email for handling classified information. Her negligence was light years away from anything that you could claim against rice.
>>695900966
>pretends to understand social science
>thinks you'd survey individuals to compare legislative effectiveness between countries
lel
>>695876334
>She also changes her views when it suits the American populous. We have no clue what she actually stands for because she is constantly changing her stance on things.
Said someone probably voting for Trump xD
>>695902063
>thinks that because Hillary finangled out of legal charges she is somehow completely innocent
And before you say innocent until proven guilty, she was proven not innocent by investigation.
>>695902090
>I'm fat
>I'm a paranoid conspiracy fag
we know
>>695876453
If he wasn't convicted, how do you know he was a child rapist?
>>695902390
So it should really be easy for you to post the FBI Director's recommendations to charge Clinton with even one crime.
Still waiting.
>>695902300
Do sociologists not conduct surveys? Would that not be something that could possibly relate to research concerning gender equality in different countries?
http://www.nytimes.com/1996/01/08/opinion/essay-blizzard-of-lies.html
>>695902438
anon'll be right back
he has to go up to /pol/ to search for the post that tells him how to answer that
>>695902575
>opinion
kek
>>695902391
Not him, but none of that is conspiracy theory territory in the least bit.
>>695900989
>Where's the justice for General Petraues? He did the same thing.
No he didn't. He didn't just mishandle government secrets - he PURPOSELY gave them to a person who didn't have the clearance to see them (who was also his mistress btw) and then admitted to trying to cover it up.
>>695876334
>The dumb bitch has never spoken a true word in her life.
Checked this with polifact.
She was the most truthful candidate of either side in the democrat and republican nomination games.
So no, your statement is as false as you are claiming her to be.
>>695902935
sure faggot
Clinton got us into Libya and destroyed a nation that highest GDP in Africa.
It's now a failed state and sanctuary for ISIS
She then turned on Syria and her and Obama were warned that the opposition were extremists and this could result in AQI returning to it's pockets of resistance in Iraq......the DIA memo predicted the rise of the Islamic State.......they turned a blind eye and kept pouring in funds and weapons to extremists until we got ISIS.
>>695903075
>Clinton did bad stuff
>because I say so
kek
She Has had 20% of her funding come from saudi arabia http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-13/saudi-arabia-has-funded-20-hillarys-presidential-campaign-saudi-crown-prince-claims a country that follows sharia law. she deleted 20,000 emails, she is above the law, she is owned by the big banks, she lies constantly, she voted for the war in iraq witch helped isis come to power. she sounds bad yet?
>>695902830
Written by her once friend and Clinton campaign donor!!!
>>695901918
>>695902003
>>695902124
Many men dont ever pay child support or even know they have children.
And they're certainly not judged for not raising a child the way a woman is.
Not that patermity leave isnt important. It is! Feminists fight for paternity leave too. But maternity leave is much more critical, because many more mothers are raising infants alone than fathers. Which isnt even to mention that women can face a range of health issues to recover from after pregnancy)
>>695903142
>//www.zerohedge.com
sounds legit
>>695903177
that's nice faggot
>>695903191
pointing out biological differences between genders and suggesting compensations be made for them is sexist. get out of here you bigot.
>>695888641
>we investigated the person we have a vested intrest in and found she was guilty of no wrongdoing
>>695901537
Except it's not and there is literally no evidence to the countrary.
>>695903130
That post is correct. Even Sanders gave her shit for that stuff and she didn't deny it.
>>695902124
>Women have absolute control over their maternity.
>America 2016
you're either high or trolling. Women have less reproductive control now than they did 10 years ago
free birth control? abortions? Good luck getting access. Remember we're talkimg about the whole countrt here, not whatever pampered suburbia Mommy set you up in
>>695903438
Actually most of that list is cringing butthurt conspiracy bullshit like most disinformation so no
you're a faggot for even reading it
>>695903130
You're an ignorant fuck and proud of it.
>>695903142
>voted for the war in iraq witch helped isis come to power. she sounds bad yet?
Good thing no Republicans ever supported the Iraq war.
>>695902090
>-She described blacks as being "super-predators"
Checked just this fact.
It was talking about a type of criminal; someone who do not feel what thy do is wrong. She does not, at any time, say she's talking about african americans. The problem is that the term was used by republicans only about african american criminals, and so they can't fathom that she wasn't talking about niggers.
>>695903529
It's really not, actually.
>>695903565
>can't prove points
>triggered
kek
>>695903610
because you say so
k
>>695902390
You know Trump was charged with colluding with the mafia, right.
Do you use the same logic then?
>>695903721
No, because it's true.
>>695903684
Can't refute points, just says kek and faggot
>>695903528
companies should lose money because women want to be sluts and sleep around with no consequence come back when you wake up from your utopian fantasy
>>695902516
>>695903820
>still replying
>doubling down
k
Lots of Hill shills came out of the woodwork all of a sudden. Very odd. I wonder how much they get paid?
>>695903834
can't refute points that can't be proven Professor Debatefag
>>695903941
Yes, I am.
>>695903684
I knoiw you're too dumb to actually read it ,but for the others who are willing to read something.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/document-archive/pgs-287-293-291-jw-v-dod-and-state-14-812-2/
