Fluffy thread !
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Fluffy thread !
>>713701335
>>713701357
it's an old tradition to post the whole set
btw, if you're the only poster, don't force a thread, you'll get it b& almost instantly. op's post debump it
This has been a nice thread though.
Question: What would you do in this situation?
>>713702157
sure but if I were one minute late with my posts, it would have died. I dug it out from page 9. 4chan punishes lonely ops
>>713702287
incinerator or litterpal training
new batch will be more obedient
>>713702287
1. Put fluffies in an outdoor pen
2. Get a new, normal fluffy
3. Put the normal fluffy in with the freaks and watch it freak out at other fluffies rolling in poopies.
>>713702421
I hate the litterpal idea. I enjoy forcing fluffies to eat shit, but the shitting fluffy is getting away with it scott-free.
I also don't believe even fluffies could be that easily convinced that shitting on someone is a nice thing to do.
>>713701546
>>713701565
>>713701581
>>713701599
>>713701613
got a link to the author?
I don't get why you guys like these threads is it some kind of fetish or some shit?
![41913%20-%20artist%3Asqueakyfriend%20doodle%20safe%20snowcone%20wawa[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/15p17rX.png "41913%20-%20artist%3Asqueakyfriend%20doodle%20safe%20snowcone%20wawa[1].png")
>>713702877
https://www.fluffybooru.org/post/list/user_id=2494/1
>>713703106
>https://www.fluffybooru.org/post/list/user_id=2494/1
thanks
>>713703025
i've seen a lot of memes come and go but this shit is on another level.
well, not really i suppose. MLP got its own board.
>>713703025
>>713703173
>spot the newfag
>>713703025
>>713703173
These threads exist to detect newfags like you.
>>713703025
For the feels. Fluffies are cute, innocent critters made for happy domestic life but end up in horrifying tragedies. By all means you should feel bad for them, but somehow it feels good instead. It's a feeling there's no word for in the english language.
![1474646133864[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/BztNTsj.png "1474646133864[1].png")
>>713703025
>>713703200
>>713703230
makes sense.
fucking fags lol.
>>713703200
>>713703230
Been here for years just never bothered with these threads tbhfamalam
>>713703106
thew woe stores are not there. were they deleted?
I usually hate tragedies where innocent people are tormented by assholes in power, but fluffies don't feel like that because in their case *WE* are the untouchable assholes and *THEY* are the victims!
>>713703268
>>713703339
Thanks anons
>>713703173
> on another level
go watch Happy Tree Friends and call PeTA for virtual abuse, fag
>>713702845
it's fluffyness at its finest.
I like the headcanon about poopie babehs, i.e. shit being the umltimate humiliation and punishment (sorry poopies) among flufies.
there's no need to convince floofies to shit at each other. they will do it on their own if they see a poopeh or a dummeh. it's their instinct to eliminate the weak and inferior. also, there's quite a lot of good works about litterpals in boxes and cut voice cords to make sure that especially foals don't see in them anything more than tools
and to top that, wickie cleanies is a must-do for creatures that hate wawa. mumahs do it for foals. stronger fluffies benefit a lot from having poopeh babehs.
it all perfectly works out in terms of logic of survival. it's ingenious
alas, I don't have much of such one-shot works saved.
Is it a funny prank when you lace someone's blunt with PCP?
>>713703680
>hellgremlinfaggotry intensifies
>>713703680
You're into hellgremlins, aren't you. What you described is literally the opposite of everything fluffies are about. Hell, fluffies are sympathetic to the point of animism, and some stories have fluffies worrying about humans hurting toys like they were alive!
>>713703833
no faggot. that's some fucked up shit, don't be an asshole. They'll be ale to tell too, that shit it's so obvious. They'll think it's coke or meth before they think it's PCP. You're gonna get your ass beat
>>713704266
well, if i knew what hellgremlins are, i might be into it. will have to research it.
i'm definitely not a hugboxer. i prefer to see those little shits in their primal, animalistic nature that deliciously belies their surface appearance.
petting them and hugging is boring, however pure torture is also pointless. their intricate social interaction, the fact that they create herds and social structures... this is the shit i'm into
damn. i wish i had the best pictures to illustrate this approach. i usually save only larger comic sets.
>>713704664
example
>>713704664
another example
>>713704664
and the best example
>>713704664
Hellgremlins are basically a sub-fandom that split off the fluffies like the fluffies themselves split off the MLP fandom. Original fluffies are naive and friendly to a fault, while the sadistic pedophile rapists are called hellgremlins. A good test someone made to define whether a picture or a story belongs in fluffy or hellgremlin fandom is to ask whether an average fluffy in that universe would be viable as a pet, as no one on their right mind would want a hellgremlin in their house.
>>713705194
that's the whole point. fluffies make great pets. however >>713705193
it's the dualistic nature of these creatures, thir survival strategies and apparent stupidity that is not stupidity at all is what makes them interesting.
in my experience with the fluffy art so far, i'd say the "sub-fandom" strongly overshadows what is supposed to be the core of the fandom. especially here, and even more on the booru
the author of the comic about skippy also makes a great venture into a fluffy's psyche. too large to post here, but easily found on the booru (tags in picture's name)
>>713705325
>"sub-fandom" strongly overshadows what is supposed to be the core of the fandom
And that is the greatest tragedy of the fluffy genre. Whereas the main appeal of fluffies is abusing their innocence, there were people who just wanted a moral blank check for power fantasies. The hellgremlin genre gradually evolved into one about unapologetically evil creatures not only capable of evil, but behaving well only by necessity or fear of punishment. It has gone to the point where some headcanons about the hellgremlinverse have fluffy ownership illegal and feeding fluffies punishable by jailtime, a stark contrast of the fluffyverse where fluffies are popular pets and shelters exist for homeless fluffies.
>>713705759
tragedy? maybe in the sense that grim blandness took over sweet blandness. torture for torture's sake is uninteresting as playing tea parties with animate teddy bears
some people like to see flufies as shit generators that belong to the washroom. other people want to see them hugged. for me, both of these approaches are completely uninteresting, and should have no appeal for an intelligent human being. while I agree with you on the aspect of brutalization, cant understand why anyone beside little girls would be interested in hugbox either.
fluffies are interesting as suprisingly intelligent DOMESTICATED ANIMALS. In this case, as fandom would have it, apparently artificially created by genetic manipulation. Several advanced mechanisms can be easily discovered in them. Fluffies are prone to imprinting, they have a herd mentality, they can create both monogamous and polygamous relationships, they break the mammal n-1 rule of typical litter size related to the number of nipples of a female (which produces fantastic field for speculation about dealing with this stark shortcoming) etc.
Just look at poopie babehs. It has a perfect rationalization in terms of survival. Feces are among the worst risk factors for survivals, especially for creatures that have fluff for coat. Brown foals are a danger to the whole herd and need to be eliminated in the only way fluffies can do it. moreso, animals in nature are practical. people these days freak out when they are told that their pork comes from real pigs. I see some of this issue in your line of argumentation
all the same, it's the trolling potential of fluffies that got me into fluffies in the first place
>>713706333
Nobody is defending plain hugboxing.
The argument is about the shift of fluffies becoming irredeemably evil assholes by nature, whereas originally they were numb, naive and generally good natured creatures, made to be toys for little girls, upon which horrible shit happened.
The hellgremlins make no sense, because no one would want one as a pet.
>>713706333
>torture for torture's sake is uninteresting
That's torture without soul, and part of why hugbox is so necessary for balance. Good abuse isn't about gore, it's about what the fluffy experiences. Hugbox helps you relate with the things, so when they're treated with malevolence you get the full picture of how wrong it is for them. They believe that huggies fix everything, power of love conquers all and that the world is a simple and wonderful place, so when humans they're created to love abuse them, it's incomprehensibly painful for them. It's not about the pain, it's about breaking them.
Meanwhile, I'd like to hear what's supposedly so interesting about hellgremlin abuse? It seems about as mentally involving as chopping firewood, if the firewood also shat and insulted you.
>DOMESTICATED ANIMALS
Fluffies are biotoys. Their brains, like everything else about them, were designed to make them ideal pets. Doing cruel things just because natural animals do them doesn't make sense, as they didn't evolve and behaviors like that would be a dealbreaker for something meant for children to play with.
>Just look at poopie babehs. It has a perfect rationalization in terms of survival.
Could you explain this again? How are brown foals a danger, and how is shitting on them going to help with survival? Wouldn't darker colors be beneficial in the wild?
>>713707659
Don't forget fluffies were a work in progress when PeTA "liberated" them into the wild. So yes, they are ment for children to play with, but they have many flaws. At least, some of them do.
>>713707288
well, would you like as a pet a creature that forms aggressive packs, murders other packs on their territory, sometimes attacks even humans, and prevents mating of some of herd members and kills off unwanted offspring? moreover, their idea of assuming leadership in their herds includes murdering the old leader by literally tearing him apart? the creature also shits and pisses on your carpet unless it's taught not to, just like hg's fluffies (hellgremlin is quite a burdensome description)
I believe you were able to guess that I'm talking about dogs.
The feral nature of fluffies doesn't rob them of their positive values. Their whole value as an interesting concept lies in this duality.
Damn, I must find time to write something bigger. About a pair that is forbidden to have offspring, runs away, eventually joins a herd, and is faced with hard survival choices. they meet some good and bad people on their road, and while they get disillusioned about "new fwends", they also manage to survive and build a future for their foals.
This shit would make it to HBO one day.
>>713704334
the one where he is high is better
>>713707984
This has been discussed before. Pic related.
>>713707659
>Could you explain this again? How are brown foals a danger, and how is shitting on them going to help with survival? Wouldn't darker colors be beneficial in the wild?
Even if a creature was created artificially, it's still an animal that comprises of instincts that were developed as an effect of natural selection. The canon that says that fluffies are perfect toys made for love and hugs, i.e. animate teddy bears, chases me away from the whole concept instantly.
Real animals have color-based instincts. Yellow and black is a signal of danger (wasps) and animals stay away from it. Red and white is a signal of poison (some mushrooms) and animals will leave them. Green fruit are almost always not yet edible, and animals will choose them only as the last resort and in most cases will leave them be until they are ripe. Brown is a color related to mud and feces. Two things that would be lethal to fluffy creatures that also strongly dislike water. Being dirty would be a disaster for them. Fungus would grow all over them after first rain. It's a huge adaptational (is that a word in english?) disadvantage.
From naturally evolved canon we know that fluffies have strong dislike of bad smells and poop itself, which is perfectly natural and sane. How would such creature be able to identify such danger? By smell and by color. One of their most important survival instincts would tell them to avoid filthy members of their own species. And that's how we come to the idea of permanently filthy fluffies who are rightfully rejected by other fluffies, rightfully at least according to simplistic fluffy logic.
Another point makes itself. How would a fragile fluffy fight other fluffies? Teeth? Nails? Hooves? No, biological warfare. Shitting on a creature like a fluffy is extremely detrimental to its survival chances and would make the best, and if we were to accept the canon about fragile bones, only real tool of fluffy warfare.
>>713708216
Smarties are an unwanted MUTATION. Most fluffies are supposed to be nice, and they were. But smarties used to run herds beacuse there were few of them and normal fluffies, being submissive, just obeyed them. Which led to feral mares only/mostly mating to these "rare" mean mutants, making them more and more widespread and turning the ferals into bad fwuffies.
And btw loose bowel control is about anus muscles, not just the brain. Scientists figured out the brain, but the incident happened while poopie place control was still inperfect.
>>713708060
Fluffies are nearly too dumb to live. Why would they become smart and evil as ferals? I still think biotoys designed down to their spine to love everything and try to fix things by hugging wouldn't suddenly develop a dictatorial caste system and start torturing for fun.
Not to mention the main keys to why feral populations survive at all have always been their fast breeding and co-operation. Especially since the dams are so helpless when pregnant.
>>713707984
>>713708216
well, assuming that we're obliged to accept any canon that already exists, in terms of genetics, when you make fingernails longer, you also make your ear lobes pink.
genes don't produce traits or behavioral patterns. genes produce proteins. if we were to assume that those scientists were not omniscient, it's much more plausible that they were able to produce colorful fluff, but making animals that are no longer animals is really a grasping concept
all in all, it even strengthens my original point, i.e. fluffies are still animals and have a wide range of random instincts typical to animals.
And one more point: we're talking here about sentient animals capable of naming themselves that talk, and form complex social structures. They are not dumb. They are extremely intelligent as for animals, but their instincts and physical traits make them prone to certain behavioral patterns.
Hugboxers see fluffies as children with fluff that are supposed to follow advanced human morality. For my private canon, I reject this notion. HG-ers see them as malfunctioning objects that need to be brutally exterminated, and while it's much more like my own headcanon, I also reject such notion. for me, when morals kick in, fluffies are no different than pigs. People even keep hairy miniature pigs as thei pets and slaughter them for christmas diner.
>>713704266
One word
>stupidity
These things are stupid to the point they can't count past 5. Paired with "human emotion" they are just selfish little shits that do nothing other than ruin everything they touch.
>>713709116
well, look at real herds of real animals.
what you call "dictatorship" is usually described as "alpha-male" system.
fixing everything by hugging is no different than fixing everything by licking.
not to mention that "torture for fun", as you describe it, is a standard practice for almost all animals that live in nests and fight for food brought to their nests. lions, e.g., will kill off offspring of former alpha male, if the cubs aren't old enough to run away and live on their own
it's just a matter of nomenclature, as I hope you see now. animals are not the saint rays of sunshine as the modern popculture is painting them.
But let's just cut to the chase: headcanons are headcanons and the real question is *why* people like classic fluffies or hellgremlins. If you don't want fluffies to be naive victims in an uncaring world, no reasoning of why they'd be like that is going to make you like them. And if you don't like fluffies as evil hellgremlins that should be destroyed as a civic duty, you're not going to like them even with any explanations behind them. That's why there are basically two sub-fandoms: People who like different, mutually exclusive creatures and content related to them.
>>713709349
can your dog count past five? we're talking about animals here. if fuffies were real, they would be the smartest animals in existence, dwarfed only by humans
their ineptitude is a mix of insane expectations some people have towards tiny animals, and their ill adaptation to their environment. These little bastards can be creative when they need to, and they can use tools, build shelters, find shelters, locate food sources, cooperate etc.
What a bunch of retarded faggots
>>713709623
join me in the middle. I'm lonely
>>713709349
Nigger, you realize that most animals on earth can't count at all.
Calling fluffies stupid is retarded. They are dumber than humans, sure, but for an animal, they are friggin geniuses intellectually.
What they are lacking is sufficient survival instincts to figure out how to live in the wild, and their bodies are shit for living as anything other than a pet, because they were made to be friggin pets.
>>713709833
for you <3
>>713709886
this anon gets it
>>713709892
>>713709839
No, I enjoy fluffies as archetypes of naivety. When I see a sad fluffy on a street corner, I like to think it's sad because it's struggling to understand why no one wants to be its new daddy, not because it lost a fight for dominance like an animal. If they were just multi-faceted little people with fluffy bodies, there would be no point in abusing them.
Speaking of which, why *do* you enjoy fluffy abuse? It must be something fundamentally different from why I like it.
>>713709892
Glorious autism right here. Holy shit this cracked me up so much.
OC. Opinions?
>>713712231
>image being white as fuck
that image is blindingly racist, respect images of color.
>>713712231
Looks promising. A bit slender for a fluffy, but you definitely have the skills for drawing fluffies.
Are you going to draw a background to give it more context? I think some massive furniture for scale would look nice.
>>713712922
No it's only a sketch
>>713710972
>Speaking of which, why *do* you enjoy fluffy abuse?
Now I'm curious too. Wouldn't that be just like abusing hoboes if they were helpless to defend themselves?
>>713701192
visual representation of autism
![1478105859917[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/khkh9ih.jpg "1478105859917[1].jpg")
>>713715803
>>713715885
More of this sort of shit.
>>713703680
Wickie cleanies for everyone! (Except poopie babbehs)
>>713718595
Why do you like this comic? The assholes get away scott-free so at least it can't be justice like some hellgremlinists claim.
>>713718705
>>713718722
Retarded hellgremlin wank.
>>713718995
Indeed, and to what degree! I avoid using autism as an insult, but this isan outright impressive amount of effort put into hating an imaginary enemy. It's like a microcosm of desperately needing an enemy to oppose, an immense potential of impotent rage directed at the most desperate power fantasy imaginable.
Whereas most people dream about fighting crime, nazis and communists, this guy wishes for tiny, helpless retards to oppose. I can't begin to describe how pathetic that is.
![1480527064165[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/t5y0Huo.jpg "1480527064165[1].jpg")
>>713723140
A book where the story is going to take place on the beach, poor fluffy is going to drown.
What are your opinions on amputations?
I enjoy genital mutilation, but not limb removal as it makes the fluffies too much of objects to simply do things *to*.
>>713724800
Good if done correctly, for example if a smarty is trying to impregnate your fluffy or if he is trying to get with to many mares in a herd.
>>713724800
I like both of those things depending on the story.
If it just happens because the antagonist in the story just decides to do it, it is not as satisfying as when it is a consequence of the fluffys' own actions.
> the look on the foal's face
>>713726229
Do fluffies have no concept of size difference?
That foal would never be able to eat all that crap.
>>713726618
>>713726618
Maybe they believe since they can produce a near infinite amount of shit, they can intake just as much too.
>>713702421
Don't post this CD faggot his shit sucks.
this is the best of fluffy in my opinion, innocent childlike little things dropped into the wicked world. More interesting i think than "every fluffy is a shitdemon from the SECOND it's born because it makes over the top abuse more palatable".
This mummuh honestly doesn't understand, and were the situations reversed she would share her food with a human because friends and wuv and shit, THAT'S what i love about fluffies, they're trying to be carebears in a world that plays like Fallout.
>>713727641
I approve 100%
>>713727641
+1
>>713701192
>Future serial killer thread
ftfy
