10/10 Human beings.
Humans have incredible range, more so than other species
I don't care if it's a guy or girl, professional or amateur, famous or anonymous. Post your ideal 10/10
The woman in the middle
>>712160836
Looks like a man
Only humans? Or can I post elves too?
>>712160148
>ITT: no niggers / shitskins
poo in loo
>>712160995
Sure but absolutely no gooks
>>712160148
What do you mean by humans have incredible range? And how is it more than other species?
>>712160925
>>712161092
>retards shitposting
at least contribute you losers
>>712161424
i dunno if want or am repulsed
im scared
>>712161551
Lol can you imagine how much her poop butt must smell, lol. Just kidding bur wonder how it would smell if I put my nose in her brown star haha jk, bit ya i mean you think i could have very poop in my mouth, lol jk, but had can I eat poop? Thanks, from my dad
>>712161424
>>712161268
Idk dude, go earn a biology degree
>>712161424
sir the topic is "human beings"
>>712160148
Perfect in every way.
>>712163110
http://www.harpersbazaar.com/fashion/models/g5785/vintage-brooke-shields-photos/
>>712163236
>>712163212
I would fuck her silly
>>712163305
>>712160148
>>712163356
I think you mean: It would be silly to fuck her. ;)
>>712161424
say what u want virgins faggots but her face looks great, if her skin was white ...
about her body i can't say anything cuz who knows how she looks entirely
The perfect man.
>>712163236
when she was pedo material
>>712164137
>>712162015
first 10/10 in thread so far.
>>712163929
When it comes to negresses with pretty faces:
Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
And she hates Islamofaggots, which is a plus.
>>712164187
congratulations, you won
>>712164400
>no tits
>10/10
yeah sure, your taste is the standard. now gtfo and die in a fire.
>>712160148
>>712164882
why is it sideways...?
>>712164875
i was waiting for the obvious trump troll
>>712161424
a hot black chick in des moines??? holy sh*t
>>712161777
Sauce?
>>712160836
Has no breasts
>>712160148
>>712165167
>>712164934
Because he wants to fuck it sideways...
>>712164187
Was that taken at Trump Tower on a party night?
>>712165245
>>712164187
/thread
>>712164967
honestly he looks pretty good for his age
>>712165295
>posting traps
fucking degenerate
>>712164067
You know you'd hit it, in a world with no consequences.
>>712165397
>>712165295
>>712165383
>posting on /b/
no u
>>712165550
>>712165579
>>712165637
Eastern Europe/Siberia ftw
>>712164187
Fucking hell.
How did I not know about that unicorn?
>>712165685
>>712165332
Fat dont crack
>>712165689
>>712165707
10/10 MILF
>>712165754
10/10 GILF
>also free candy
>>712165748
>>712165797
Holy fuck!
>>712165397
maybe one day I'll understand what the fuck was going on in the 70's and how a line of responsible adults could greenlight such a photograph
>>712161777
damn. sauce? hopefully vids
>>712161170
So 5/10 thread then
>>712165988
Cunt bitch slut with fucked up ideas
>>712166052
Wtf is up with her foot?
>>712164000
Checked
>>712165707
Stacy's mom?
>>712166013
The late 70s were an amazing time, anon.
All of Brooke Shields' early movies are basically excuses to ogle a gorgeous 10-16 year old. They barely have plot.
"Tilt" is my favorite. There's a scene where she embarasses a trucker who picks her up hitch-hiking by pretending to be a preteen slut. The whole movie is her hustling at pinball in seedy bars wearing tight jeans while some guy "pimps" her gaming skills.
>>712160148
> if: thread about human diversity
> then: 150 pictures of skinny white girls
Daily reminder starting a thread on /pol/ with pic related (non-old Hillary Clinton) gets you permabanned.
Why?
Ask /pol/
>>712166669
because nobody wants to see a fat nigger
>>712166490
Seriously, watch this scene from "Tilt." All men were closet pedos back then. Not very far in the closet, either...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZlbQcLG0Bls
>>712166699
Because everybody would fuck it then, but bury it now?
>>712166490
I know that
what really interests me is why and how
what kind of general mindset was it that some mainstream heavy metal band could say "Hey let's put a naked 10yo legs spread on our next album cover!" and then their label say "Good idea guys!"
it just puzzles me
>>712166884
http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Loliticians/1
>>712165331
>>712165284
>>712164563
>>712164187
>>712165748
>>712165804
The only sullying part is that she's Jayden smith's GF.
That pic is from some ugly tower a few blocks down from south street seaport. Her instagram is a cringefest though, if you just don't read any of the captions and look past how infatuated she is with herself and putting on a show as if she herself were wealthy, she's still a world class fucktoy.
I've spent years carefully curating a 'perfect for various reasons' folder that my girlfriend regularly pores over for her silly little 'motivational collage' things she hangs in the gym.
I guess it's a pretty good system.
>>712161754
>poop but.
What?
>>712166890
There was just no idea that it was wrong or bad to even look at or think of young people sexually yet. Some girls can be beautiful at any age, even 10 (like Brooke was). So, why would it be bad to look at attractive girls? Touching might be bad; but looking? Everyone enjoys looking.
The idea of "sexualization" didn't exist yet in the mainstream. The mainstream idea was the opposite: that all people are sexual; that even young children naturally touch their genitals and "masturbate," and it's only oppressive society that forces young people to stop touching themselves and turns them into unnaturally asexual children.
Read the pop psych of the day; it was all derived from the 60s counterculture, and emphasized sexual freedom. The late 70s were the height of it, where the same mores started to be applied even to kids. Playboy and Penthouse issues from the late 70s talked about attractive kids like Brooke or the young-teen cast of "Little Darlings" (pic related) the same way they'd talk of any sex symbols. There was pushback, as in the People cover about the controversy over Brooke's nudity in "Pretty Baby." But, it seemed like a natural extension of the 60s freedom movement to treat kids like young adults with as much autonomy and respect for their natural tendencies--including sexuality--as possible.
And then the 80s happened. Reagan and the Moral Majority attacked not just porn, but the whole foundation of 60s "free love" counterculture. Feminists pushed "patriarchy" and "sexualization" of women and girls. The party was over History started moving in the other direction...
I can't wait for 4chan to go out of business.
For the sake of FUCK, I've been posting on here since the beginning and ever since 2014 it has degraded STEEPLY. It used to be you could go through ONE thread without shitposters or /pol/ fags taking over.
And every month it just gets worse and worse. The quality of pics aren't as good and no one even tries anymore due to the overwhelming shitposts. Shitposts used to be 50% and creative. Now they're 90% and derivative.
All these fucking ads everywhere? That's because traffic is falling and the owners are desperate
Congrats fucktards. You killed this whole fucking website
>>712168148
>since 2014 it has degraded
try 2012 newfag
>>712167053
>http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/Loliticians/1
There is no God...
>>712168148
>It used to be you could go through ONE thread without shitposters or /pol/ fags taking over.
That hasn't been the case since 2009 but nice try fag. The fact that you don't like OC over "quality" instagram model pics condensed into one gallery for you shows that you haven't been here since summer because 4chan has always been about the rare gems and going through tons of weeds to find them. You're the type of cancer killing the board so stop posting until you've lurked long enough to understand such fundamental things as board culture and memes
>>712168148
That's a nice raptor.
Do you have any pictures of it eating that girl?
Did I just invent a new fetish, or has that been done??? Gotta research...
>>712168330
It was shitty during election season and for a little while after that it got better. But since the alt right bullshit and everybody picking a side on the internet culture war really taking off in 2014, there has been no looking back. You can't even come here to NOT talk about retarded political opinions anymore
>>712168837
>>712160148
>>712168522
>4chan has always been about the rare gems and going through tons of weeds to find them
What a fucking myth. You absolute faggot. For most of 4chan's history 40% of the porn was mainstream, professional models, 40% was cam girls, 10% was creep shots and 10% were "rare gems like Jessica Lynn Valerio who I bet you've never even heard of until now
4chan has ALWAYS been about the best stuff you could find without too much effort. Now it's about 150 pictures of my overweight girlfriend with bad lighting and fucking CUCK captions
Fuck this place and fuck you you fucking poser
>>712168997
Nudes/more