> american elections have ended > everyone sayin who
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
> american elections have ended
> everyone sayin who they support
answer like you think and let's see where you really stand
https://www.politicalcompass.org/test
>post results
>here is mine
shameless self bump
>>711703342
heres mine although it may not be fully accurate since i had a hard time understanding some questions. english is not my native language.
so im in the red. what does this mean?
>>711704296
you're a commie
>21
>Cis-Hetero-Male
>Full time college student, majoring in Physics
>Work part time for $1 above minimum wage to help pay for school.
>Don't smoke weed.
I would have voted for Bernie but I voted 3rd party party because I didn't like either candidate and don't like the 2 party system.
>>711703342
>supporting any form of government
>>711704381
nope im not a communist thats for sure
Here's the one I took yesterday. Voted Trump.
>>711703342
For reference.
welcome to 4chan where many are Q3
>>711704296
red is left-wing authoritarian, with means that you would support communism. Maybe you should have googled some questions or translated them
>>711704674
u gay
>>711704860
good boy
>>711703342
>6 pages
i didn't come here to work.
>>711704890
lol'd @ molotov. I have friends in this area on the compass that are saying we shouldn't respect our democracy because it isn't a democracy anyways yadayadaya. Revolution is coming yadayadaya. I honestly want to tell them to shut the fuck up as I know neither of them voted, and they sit in tumblr/facebook echo-chambers all day.
>>711705013
Lol no. Communism is *top* upper left, which is an extreme form of authoritarian socialism.
>>711704674
>>711705044
and thus we sum up why the usa is a two-party oligarchical system instead of being a democracy.
>>711705152
this
>>711704860
>nazi
no shit.
>>711705264
Communism can be Authoritarian or Libertarian.
>>711704923
>>711704674
spooky. im 19
full time phys maj
work part time
dont smoke O.o
>>711705406
How the fuck do you have libertarian communism?
>20
>Didn't vote.
>Employed and Student (Nursing Major)
>>711705013
>>711705264
i found this it gives more info
>>711705478
libertarian socialism is a thing, but yeah no i don't think you can have libertarian communism.
>>711705406
Correct. However, the person in question placed no where near any form of Communism, whether it be authoritarian or libertarian. He's barely left of center, while remaining slightly traditional (authoritarian on compass).
He's actually falls under Social Democracy, even though he is still authoritarian on the scale, this would still be the most fitting category of political philosophy.
>>711705478
>>711705589
Read up on Kropotkin, or Bakunin (Anarcho Communists)
Or any of the Marxist derivatives focusing on Any Authortarian (DeLeonism, Council Communism, Left Communism)
>>711705627
He's basically a slightly more authoritarian Bernie
>>711705589
You should study up before you speak on issues as if you have a clue, as there absolutely is such a thing as libertarian communism. One of the greatest modern political philosophers, Noam Chomsky, advocates and identifies as a libertarian communist.
Hi
>>711703342
ITT: Cucks and liberals
Very right wing indeed.
Check em
I really have no view
>>711703342
I have fairly similar results
>>711704890
yup shure
> be me - OP
>dont smoke weed
>dont own a che shirt
>dont support armed protests
>in the 'watter my weed plant'
lol wut?
![7000704cb213c17b4ac0260cfdcbaee1[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/DyWlGOe.png "7000704cb213c17b4ac0260cfdcbaee1[1].png")
>20
>Irish Male
>Studying Graphic Design
>Have worked multiple jobs
>>711706541
>>711705864
>>711704726
Comrades!
>>711706695
>He's left wing
>He must be a communist
![thumb_COLOURBOX9938692[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/wB3aChl.jpg "thumb_COLOURBOX9938692[1].jpg")
>>711706459
>>711704827
>>711704860
>>711704674
>>711706415
Normal people!
>>711706891
The Bottom left is typically reserved for AnComs and AnSynds, so it is a reasonable assumption
>>711703342
Took this a while ago. I identify as moderate and I'm not crying over the results of the election like the far left.
>>711706918
that means i wont get gassed?
>>711707154
I'm far left, and most of the far left I associate with are not so much crying over the individual results, but more so pushing for a systematic change away from theis "Two-Party, Representative" System
>>711703342
Bullshit test, I'm much further up
>>711707055
The whole bottom left?
kek
Not in the bottom left? You're doing it wrong.
>>711703342
>>711707480
Well, No, Just from -5 to -10 Economically, and -7 to -10 socially.
This is boring
>>711707413
maybe youre not really as edgy as you would like to be
>>711705406
I know what your saying, but it'll always end up authoritarian. Its human nature, blood.
>>711707746
Maybe, but lets see how Rojava plays out. So far seems to be going quite well.
>>711705753
Lol at this "anarcho communism" meme. If you want anarcho communism their are still plenty of indigenous tribes about.
>>711703342
Half Gandhi and half Stalin.
>>711707746
Can say literally the same thing regarding Capitalism and I wouldn't be wrong in any way.
"But it's crony-Capitalism...." lol.
And yes, i know i am a Nationalsocialist
>>711707956
And ignores the other varieties listed. How typical
Why so many green quarters?
>>711708149
I know you want to be edgy and all, but you're no where near Socialism, and you're actually further left than Hitler and his "National Socialism" was.
>>711704860
Better
>>711706194
too average
Always remember: you can't spell SUBTEXT without BUTTSEX
>>711708300
Kids and leeches
purp master race
>>711709292
Because the libertarian right who thinks it's possible to survive without government programs is totally logical.
Meanwhile internet, roads, phone system, gps... I could go on.
None of which are possible under a libertarian right style of government.
>>711709350
Purple box master race
I get tired of doing these.
My ideal system.
Ideally, the state would be abolished, and the basic organizational structure would be a directly democratic commune. The workplaces in the commune, regardless if creative, manufacturing, or service, would all be run as cooperatives. People would decided to do what ever they feel they are best suited in. Some may like being a cab driver, so they do that. Others may like cooking, so they work in a restaurant. Etc.
Cooperation between communes could be facilitated by a inter-communal assembly. Trade, Mutual aid agreements, etc would be discussed here
Also, by this point, we should have such a surplus of production, that we could community store houses where one takes what they need. (Money may or may not exist in its current form by now)
>>711709686
>strawman
>denying the antecedent
Try again
>>711710045
And no one would every be forced to discover the wonders of being a janitor.
>>711710203
Again, their would be some level of organization.
Like if you are working at a school in what ever capacity, you can be moved to fill in for a vacancy on a short term basis. Also, Janitor would probably merge with general maintenance, which people actually like. Hands on repair of things around the work place. But they would also have to clean and keep it tidy)
>>711710169
You can call fallacies all you want, it doesn't refute the argument.
None such fundamental parts of our society would be possible without government and its programs. These are facts.
Try debating the facts and not the argument next time, it's why libertarians aren't taken seriously.
>>711710482
So, you would be combining a civil engineer with janitorial services?
Why not get machines to do that, what with the potential abundance, if not over-saturation, of engineers and programmers?
And I consider myself monarchist, I just don't care what people do as long at they pay taxes, and are loyal to authority
Far right danish fag here.
Guess that says more about my country than me
>>711710783
Well, true, it would be automated soon enough, but until then, their will be overlap.
But is maintenance really civil engineer in reality? Most of the places I've been in, Maintenance and Janitors were one in the same. One moment they could be cleaning up a students vomit, and the next, they could be installing a new window. Or repairing Automatic door motors.
>>711703342
Mine,
White Male
24
Economics Degree
Voted Trump
>>711704296
you like controlling people you fascist.
>>711711179
Windows and door motors are part of a building. If it is your job to maintain a building beyond appearance, then you are a Civil Engineer.
>>711707363
As someone who wasn't a fan of trump, but sits slightly right, slightly down, this. Anyone with a brain, on both sides, is just pushing away from the Democrats and Republicans, which is why Trump won. If the DNC had done their job correctly, Bernie would have won, and we would have had a different kind of political revolution. I'm kind of glad it was Trump who won though, Bernie turned out to be a bit of a pussy. He's being pretty cool now though.
My compas is really damn weird, I'm an atheist nazi lol
>>711711476
I would say that Bernie was threatened. That would explain his sudden "change" of heart.
But, from what I say, many of the Organizers of these protests are moving to pin blame just as much on the DNC as Trump. And to shift away from the system.
>>711711618
You're no Hitler.
>>711709686
Thats only about as hard core libertarian as you can get. Most just believe is the smallest you can have the government while still maintain certain aspects of society (those that fall under the public domain)
>>711711453
But, my point stands, there is a lot of overlap in what a Civil Eng does in regards to maintenance with janitors. So they could be merged into one job
I'm pretty sure the religion section is what pushed me so far to the left.
>>711711618
At most you are a mildly Authoritarian SocDem
>>711711476
Economist here, nothing Bernie said was actually economically viable. So either he is as dumb as people claim he is or he is a liar.
(He WAS the only one with a soul, turns out even socialists can be bought though)
![e9447312d7d981d6252ba0418f2356a3[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/BWWW9kD.png "e9447312d7d981d6252ba0418f2356a3[1].png")
>18y
>Male
>Studying in college
>Laveyan Satanist
am i the only red one here?
Not a burger, but here's mine. Given the options available I'd have voted Trump.
Did I do good /b/?
>>711711857
Well then I declare myself a national social democrat
That's a thing, right..?
>>711712455
Trump, Yes
Authoritarian, No
Makes sense.
I thought those were good questions too.
>>711712550
Probably. Every ideology exists, though not necessarily with the name we would think.
>>711704890
/thread.
Also:
Anyone at left must die on fire.
>>711711816
You have a point, my religios viewpoints are very left, my chart shows me as centre right even with that. >>711711816
What does this mean?
>>711703342
>all these statist cucks
What the hell are with you, guys?
>>711703342
>Femanon
>Christian
>British
>23
>Scientist
>Limp-wristed hippy-humping loony lefty
r8 my chart
>>711713355
We're not robots.
>>711713726
h8/b8
>>711713557
This is not your blog, go suck niggerdick
>>711713726
>we dont need roads where im going
>>711713726
Nice. Needs pictures.
>>711713809
So why you don't want liberty? Why should you have to obey any order of a ruler, and also force others to do the same?
You looks pretty robot to me.
>>711714038
You do know that Libertarians recognize there are legitimate roles of government, right?
>>711714141
Implying I should pay for roads I dont use, commie
>>711703342
>>711714515
Actually, /b/ is far left now, so:
<<</b/
>>711714417
Highways were originally built for military purposes so that defense assets could easily move from place to place in a country to ensure quick and efficient defense strategies.
Are you saying that you shouldn't pay for a standing military that acts as a deterrent against foreign governments and groups?
>>711705478
Communist economy, everything else libertarian.
>>711705499
>(Nursing Major)
LONDON
O
N
D
O
N
>>711714136
Liberty and Justice aren't possible when you have/give total freedoms. Robots can just reprogram themselves; humans cannot.
Total freedoms includes the freedom to deny Liberty and Justice. Dominating is human nature- being able to curtail that nature can't be done in 2 simple steps. To add, not everyone has the right mind to be "perfect people"... and so, if you make every man who is more equal than others, completely equal across the board, then you end up with a few people who will do more harm than good.
Besides, hegemonic systems don't have to be "evil" either- did you know you can have people who are willing to be governed in exchange for, say, community? For... order? Where in a system of self-governance, without true vigilance, no one will ever avoid crime or drudgery?
There is no one way to run (insert system here). But not every system is immediately compatible with reality.
Baby steps are required when it comes to modifying our nature- which is why we shouldn't ever be allowed to have total freedoms all the time, ever.
>>711714915
>>711715319
Until you are fired for no good reason, and you are out of a job, and have a family to feed, and rent to pay. Soon you'll be on the street, with only the clothes on your back.
>20 years old
>studying psychology
>wanna have a military career
>used to be a stoner
>my ideology is do whatever you want as long as it doesnt effect me
>free speech for anything and everything is a must
That's what I got. Apparently so did everyone else.
>>711715218
word
>>711703342
French-Canadian
Traditionally socialist, going more to the right as time goes.
Would have voted for Trump if given the chance.
>>711715447
>Until you are fired for no good reason
Well a business who fires their assets for no good reason obviously isn't a business that can sustain itself for long
>and you are out of a job, and have a family to feed, and rent to pay.
If I was truly fired for no reason, then it shouldn't be that hard to find another job considering I was doing fine in my current trade. Plus, I have hazard funds saved away like a functioning and intelligent adult to hold me over until then because I don't live outside my means.
You can stop projecting your own irresponsibility and carelessness onto me anytime.
>>711713726
I'm okay with Lol politics are dumb
>>711709292
Or good people who have never been fucked over.
then again, i'm pretty intelligent and autarkic
>>711715832
Intelligent people don't believe in fairy tales and delusions.
>>711708149
oh wow man ur so cool how many swastikas do you have??
>>711716179
Fuck, pic didn't go through
>>711716005
Intelligent people are still capable of doing stupid. Sometimes that involves hyperbole.
>>711711927
Also economist here. Essentially everything he said was economically viable as he specifically gave how each one would be paid. Even without something to spend it on the 0.1 percent financial transactions tax should be implemented to discourage automatic arbitrage trading and the artificial force it exerts on markets without creating value.
>>711715700
Wow I forgot the picture and am confusing the 2 axes.
Better leave the thread in shame now
>>711711927
Well the guy on /b/ said so boyz it must be legit
MAGA
Sounds just about right.
>>711716005
>get your ideals out of this ideology test
>>711715742
>Well a business who fires their assets for no good reason obviously isn't a business that can sustain itself for long
I've had coworkers fired for voicing concerns with the business. And had others let go for on the job injury, due to the negligence of management.
And then theres my friend, who is routinely fired for stupid shit. hit boss even threw a wrench at his face.
>If I was truly fired for no reason, then it shouldn't be that hard to find another job considering I was doing fine in my current trade.
That is assuming that your field is in demand. For auto mechanics, IT or something, sure you'll have no problem finding a new job. But if it was more specialized, and not in demand, (Forensic Psychologist or something) then you are Shit out of luck.
>Plus, I have hazard funds saved away like a functioning and intelligent adult to hold me over until then because I don't live outside my means.
Only lasts for so long, until those run dry. Then what? Assuming no one is hiring in your field, or theirs an over abundance of potential hires?
>so many damn fascists on here
>>711711759
I'm sympathetic to libertarianism, but am for protectionism and a small government.
>>711716632
Shut up and stop lying, you're given a probation period where they can fire you for anything they deem bad enough. After that it's down to you and HR. Go outside.
It's like you've never worked.
>>711716482
hows the hatred and bigotry working for you?
>>711713726
Spot the autist.
>>711716988
Stop lying?
I live in a "At-Will employment" state, where you can be fired for anything. And stuff like this has happened. I've seen it my entire life. People being let go for no good reason.
>>711715218
>Total freedoms includes the freedom to deny Liberty and Justice
If you deny Liberty, you are against freedom. So you are against everything that Ancap believe.
> hegemonic systems don't have to be "evil"
The government is the only one with power to "legally" deny someone liberty.
Aka, government is slavery.
>Not every system is immediately compatible with reality
Thats is "anarcho"-syndicalism vs "anarcho"-communism. You can't fight government with more government.
>Baby steps are required
Thats why whe needs a right-winged leader first, so after that a libertarian leader, and so a minarchist leader and in the end finally ends this shit.
>>711715218
>not seeing the fallacy in law created by the same entity it's supposed to govern
Yes you are right mankind is dominant in nature.
We are also mortal. It's a common misconception that you have any "right to live". If man was completly free then yes, you might get mudered for no reason. However, it's completly unnatural to come up with an agreement we should not.
Society is driven by the collective mindset, which is formed by participation and observation of the community. Murdering your neighbour doesn't give you a nice social status, so it is not in your advantage. Comitting murder would most likely result in banishment. See what im getting at.
A free society will come up with their own morality based upon experience and handle accordingly in the most natural way witouth any recorded obstructions.
>>711715742
> Be CEO
> Enjoy benefits of state educated population and state infrastructure
> Enjoy downward compression of wages due to free movement of people
> Artificially inflate prices for more profit
> Lobby for tax cuts for businesses
> Take huge personal share of the companies profit
> Stash it in tax haven and legal loopholes
> Do not put cash back into the economy.
> Move business overseas when it suits me causing redundancies.
>>711716632
>Only lasts for so long, until those run dry. Then what? Assuming no one is hiring in your field, or theirs an over abundance of potential hires?
Work for youself.
You DON"T need a ruler, in the same way you DON"T need a boss.
Sell homemade icecream, offer you hand services, Use you car/motocicle to Uber/Taxi, you can grow you own shit.
You can even Whore youself, you have no ruler to forbide you.
>>711716247
whats your views anon. we got similair results
FeelsFreedomMan
>>711717803
>Lobby for tax cuts for businesses
Which is why I believe mostly in a separation of economics and state.
>>711717896
>You DON"T need a ruler, in the same way you DON"T need a boss.
I am speaking from an AnSynd perspective.
And yes, I agree that we could just become self employed. There is nothing against that in my book, as you are not exploiting the workers, as why would you exploit your self? You are choosing to do that.
>>711717388
I say this as a straight white dude.
The right wing is, by definition. anti-abortion, against gay rights, against trans rights, against women's rights, against immigrant rights, etc.
Sounds like it's only freedom and liberty for straight white dudes born in the US.
>>711706836
>mfw im in the why cant everyone just be nice section
1776, bitches.
>>711718178
How can this ever happen, since:
> The state is responsible for education of your workforce
and:
> The state requires taxes for public services and infrastructure
> To generate taxes there needs to be employment
>>711718640
Okay, Hillary, we get it, you're trying to appeal to everyone.
>>711718291
alt-rith =/= right wing.
Also, anti-abortion is anti-child-killing acceptance.
Kill innocent human is not a libertarian thing.
I'm a minarcist
Why are there so many socialists/retarded people on this thread?
This is my results
>>711704726
>On the left
>Not supporting any kind of government
>>711706836
That right and libertarian doesn't fit at all - that's the most stupid compass I've ever seen
Consistently get this result whenever I take these.
Not fascist enough :(
>>711718072
Kinda what Trump is saying for business and how its leaving the US for other countries
Pro choice, but women should not be able to just walk in and get an abortion
For legalizing marijuana
I think we need a good amount of reform in our education
We need to invest a lot more in cleaner energies, punish those corporations (To the extent it hurts) greatly that neglect our environment, maybe even a carbon tax but I need to look into that more
Help breakup monopolies and tax the large corporations more
Pro gay marriage I dont give a shit who you marry as long as if they're of age obviously
Religion should be taught outside of schools (unless its private I dont care then), focus more on evolutionary science
Need to remove those on welfare that do not need to be
Deport all those that are here illegally and taking advantage of our country
Government is taking advantage of new technology and spying on us which should be reduced but not by a lot
Spending way to much on the military in my opinion. We should reduce and use that money to rebuild infrastructure and create jobs to those that genuinely need them
More gun control (not like banning certain weapons) in terms of more regulation
Trump is limiting lobbying right? Because thats something that needed to be change years ago
Any more views you want to know, thats all I can think of right now.
I feel like Ill get a lot of hate like this. If you disagree Id like to hear what you think
Trump
>>711719637
Oh shit right
Pardon Edward Snowden
Punish and break up the huge banks on wall street for housing market crisis
Voted Trump btw
sorry forgot to add this shit
>>711719936
If he doesn't pardon Assange and Snowden I'm fuckin rioting
>>711717388
>Total freedoms
I'm not against Liberty, so I'm not against the concept of freedoms. I'm against the concept of total freedoms.
>The government
Perhaps I believe in natural slaves.
>Not every
Then simply rework the government. You said it yourself at the end... baby steps, as I said before... that's fighting government with government if nothing else. You would be gradually shifting the way things work.
>>711717482
>It's a common misconception that you have any "right to live"
So are morals and societal norms- there are no natural rights. Rights are arbitrary. The only thing that ensures rights, as far as the human scope goes, are other agents that are most likely also human. No one is truly obligated to run with an established society, but it's obvious (most of the time) as to what one can reap from working with society once inside the system.
If you say society is driven by the collective mindset, formed by participation and observation... where is the fallacy in law created by the same entity it is supposed to govern?
You just typed that murder is a social faux pas and will often get you banished or punished in some shape or form. That, on the whole, behavioral reinforcement will not encourage or reward someone who murders their neighbor. If a free society comes up with their own morality, they will have come up with something that does not exist in nature. Something effably unnatural in of itself.
It's all arbitrary if not relative, hence the notion that a free society will not encourage punishment or reward as greatly, due to the abundance of anomie. No one whole entity in a free society, except itself as all people who choose to act as part of the free society, will be driving that incentive to not murder. The only person to have to answer to, are your neighbors- to which you could murder.
>>711719862
>>711718827
I like you
>>711718827
I'm in the green, and I wouldn't mind Minarchy.
>>711720198
The fucks a minarchy?
>>711720053
Does Assange technically need to be pardoned? Him too if he does I didnt know for sure so I didnt say
>>711720394
I believe he'd be charged with the same whistleblower laws that Snowden would, regardless he'd need a public gesture to return to America.
>>711720324
A Minarchy would be a government under Minarchism.
>>711720324
Minarcist
Believes in a minimal state - Military defence of the state (no regime change mission, only defence) and security (police and fire department) and justice system within the nation.
Maybe some soup kitchens for the homeless.
>>711720187
So we have, at least, 4 Minarchists here.
>mfw
>>711720324
Government have no power over people liberty.
They only control few things like roads, courts and police.
Everything else is with the people(voluntary or private bussines).
>>711720701
I agree 100% but I would not riot lol
>23
>white bi-sex male
>small business owner/freelance writer
That being said, I loathe the agenda pushing, thought policing SJWs and I'm glad Trump won, because that postpones the nuclear war with Russia with at least 4 years.
>>711720198
Well, a minachy would mean economical freedom and you don't have that in the green.
Is this a fair assessment of minarchists?
>>711720953
But, why do I need to be against economical freedom if I happen to land in the green?
>>711721104
The left-right spectrum indicates the economical freedom.
>>711721326
But I exist.
>>711721482
Left believes in a less free market. Free market = economic liberty.
>>711703342
maga
>>711721104
By economical freedom he means corporations will be free to dump their waste wherever, exploit workers, create monopolies and oligarchies.
Don't mind him, he's a retard.
Can someone explain me wtf i am
>>711720988
No, this is more precise.
>>711715319
Why are there so many commieshits on 4chan? Fucking subhumans
>>711721714
A socialdemocrat
>>711721714
an apolitical moron
>>711721482
I think you might be cheating yourself, your political compass is telling me other things than you are
>>711721905
>authoritarian leaning
>anything but supreme pleb
I am currently experiencing what can only be classified as "disdain" for you.
>>711722115
Nice compare to >>711719637
was rooting for Bernie until it became clear he wouldn't win
I voted for Trump because fuck Clitary
>>711722230
A E S T H E T I C
>>711721130
was here about 3 years ago
>>711722385
I was voting for Trump because I realized that Bernie didnt have a chance. Dont you think he lets people walk all over him?
>>711722417
literally the only thing you have going for you
The governments job is not to control the people, but to assist and foster their development ie. science grants, education, roads, not getting buttfucked by a neighboring nation, not getting taken advantage of by economic elite, etc.
Corporations on the other hand, because of the immense potential power they wield over average citizens, must be regulated to prevent them from things like raping the environment that rightly belongs to all citizens.
>20
>Voted for Johnson
Blah blah blah
>>711721616
>>711722113
>pic related
Just going to remind everyone that political compasses and ideologies are hard and fast rules, Zebras don't exist, that there can never exist exceptions to the rule, nor can there exist compromise, or loaded questions, or unique nuances.
t. cookie cutter stereotype
>>711721675
I vaguely agree with the retard sentiment, but I'd much rather invoke the notion that a lot of people are so vehemently partisan, that they often cling to
>muh (color)
more than they cling to their own rationale.
>>711722629
>>711722385
Please don't vote for socialism, it doesn't work.
With love
Denmark
>>711722724
Wanna get real triggered?
>National Socialism is a good economic model
>>711722901
I like you
But your political views aren't libertarian
>>711722941
Hes better than Clinton
In the face of increasing population and increasing prevalence and availability of automation, only two possible futures exist
1. Socialism, or at least a guaranteed basic income with the ability to work in one of the few impossible to automate jobs for extensive luxury spending
2. A wildly stratified caste society with your rich inventors and scientists/engineers owning the new automated factories and designing the things they make, and your poor classes for whom work simply no longer exists.
>>711722855
>The governments job is not to control the peopl...
AHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHHHHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
>Corporations on...
Good news to you.
1)Corporation only exist with Government.
2)Governent IS a corporation
>>711723043
>loses the war
>gets cucked so bad they lose the half of their native territory to commies
LMAO'ing @ ur life
>>711723054
Maybe, but almost all the candidates where awful this election.
I were rooting for Rand Paul
>>711723622
Yeah I see why you were rooting for him, I dont disagree with him on much from what I read
>>711723043
>the years leading to WW2
Gee I wonder... it's as if their industry was pumping out as much as it could, as if they were in preparation for some sort of.. event or something?
China must also be doing something right, huh?! Just look at that massive growth a generation after The Great Leap Forward. Totalitarian communism is totally legit, son.
>>711724171
China made the transition from communism tho
>>711706018
indeed
>>711724109
The only one, whom might be better than him, is his father, Ron Paul.
>>711724555
Nice trips, and I think Ron Paul is much better too bad he didnt make it far
>>711723359
>Socialism, or at least a guaranteed basic income with the ability to work in one of the few impossible to automate jobs for extensive luxury spending
That sounds like the preferable out come.
>>711724731
Yeah, and he's too old now. I'm hoping for Rand Paul to make it in 2024, that would be great.
>>711725271
I wonder if he'll run then. Who knows how different the country will look by then though. His views may change a little too but that can be expected of everyone or most
Anon, im still a fag
I don't understand how anyone could fall on the authoritarian side
>>711726697
They are too interested in policing other citizen's lives.
>>711705540
Til am gahndi
>>711725898
I think he'll keep his libertarian views, their family is afterall quite libertarian. I think he'll give it another go some time. It took Reagan 3 trys to become president, it'll probably be hard for him aswell, but he's still "young".
>>711726697
I don't understand how anyone doesn't understand how anyone could fall on a side of the graph.
>>711724731
Oh yes, Ron Paul the fake libertarian, who railed against government spending, than added tons of pork barrel to bills he knew would pass at the last second before voting against it. Greatest con artist to ever join the senate.
>>711726697
In the same way, how can anyone fall on the economic-authoritarian left side.
>>711727552
Easy, by not wanting to replace powerful government with powerful corporations.
> 28y
> White straight male
> Catalan separatist
>Think leftie scene aren't enough manly an full of posers
> Hate anarkonerds cause they ruining all important things for ridiculous motto.
>Actually more lefty than, practically, all of t'hem.
>>711712412
quality bait
>>711727550
Sorry, I haven't read much up on that and I probably should know that. Based I what I know I liked him. Thanks for informing me Ill have to look up on that. If you having any reliable sites you can refer me to that would be helpful. Id like to know more about this
>>711727043
Yeah he would be a decent age to run. But again I have to read more up on him, before I could make a strong judgement. I appreciate your view
Meh
I voted for the God-Emperor.
>>711727960
government is a corporation. Nothing change, mate.
>>711728104
Yous one of them poser kinds.
>>711704890
Your politicians for reference. In case you missed it, you voted for sociopaths with huge sticks up their asses. Muh freedumz!
>>711705540
That looks like my filename. Hmm.
I like drinking vodka
>>711706695
The anarcosyndicalist flag. Haven't seen that since the Spanish Civil War.
>>711728104
>catalan
>white
Kek
>>711731376
I've seen them flown at quite a few Anti-Trump rallies latel, along side various AntiFa flags
>>711709899
You and me and the Dalai Lama are within a tick of each other. Namaste!
>>711731413
Fair skin, green eyes, chesnut-brown hair... Too white for you, nigga.
>>711731584
The people at those rallies are facists and they don't even know
>>711703342
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdRTm5Lw57o
>>711719637
>Deport all those that are here illegally and taking advantage of our country
Hope you like picking strawberries and flipping burgers, gringo.
>>711731698
>I didn't notice this
>this is new information
I'm going to just let that one sink in.
>>711732004
both of those jobs will be replaced by robots very soon. get the fuck out of here.
>>711732004
Doesn't matter when you have a law and psychology degree and no debt
>>711728104
Para tí, compa.
https://youtu.be/AehZ6EAxlMI
>>711731941
No, they are not. They allow everyone to speak their mind, except for Fascists, as they can't be allowed any ground.
Fascists are always dangerous. Their ideology must be fought in the streets, in the media, everywhere.
i somewhat consider myself a fascist
>>711731413
Don't know much about Yurrup, do ya son?
Wealthy white christian conservative male 18yo
Well then
>>711732944
hi twin
>>711732472
Monsanto will take care of your nutritional needs, gringuito. Just don't ask how they make their Soylent Verde.
>>711732784
Those people have assaulted people because they voted Trump - so yes, they are facists
>>711703342
Here's me OP
>>711733522
And Trump supporters have assaulted minorities because of their skin colour, so yes, they are fascist.
>>711733884
>[citation needed]
>>711733522
9/11 was the burning of the Reichsstag. Now the new Krystallnacht has begun.
>>711733884
Let's not forget about those shillary supporters who went out of their way to start shit after the election results...
>>711728147
Ron Paul actually wrote in Rand Paul on the ballot
https://wwwDOTfacebookDOTcomSLASHronpaulSLASHvideosSLASH10155156810546686/
>>711734107
Can you explain the significance?
>>711733884
Never said some Trump supports isn't facists. I'm just saying both sides have Facists. And no Trump supporters have assaulted homeless people or made up stories about being assaulted by the other side. Trump supporters haven't done much wrong.
>>711710169
not even a strawman you fucking inbred. that's exactly what a lot of libertarians on this website want
Canada fag here
>>711734021
>>711734747
Not necessarily supporting attacks on Minorities due to skin colour, but same idea
http://usuncut.com/news/trump-supporters-brutally-attack-gay-man-california/
Also part of the reason we see little wrong, is that the media is so focused on preserving the status quo by portraying all protestors as the same violent types. While in reality it was only in a few cities.
>>711734098
95% aren't even Hillary supporters. Most are Bernie Types, Socialists, or Anarchists.
