s/fur
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
s/fur
floof
bump
Shark is best
Prove me wrong
>>710415664
I'm not a story teller, and I'm not really in the mood. But whatever.
>be 11
>looking up porn of Midna from TLoZ:TP
>find some with wolf Link, like this one in particular
>think it's hot that she's getting fucked by a dog
That was the precursor to my zoophilia, and I remember fantasizing being fucked by a dog by 12 or so.
>be 14
>get a doggo
>horny and desperate, basically rape her mouth whenever I feel like it
>cut that shit out at 16 because I realize it's horrible
>eventually form a better relationship
>finger her and eat her out every now and then
>she loves it, but doesn't like any actual penetration
>do that occasionally for a few years
>be 19
>this summer
>go to see doggo after moving out of parents' house
>super excited to see her
>turns out she's in heat
>desperate and whining and needing a fuck, I decide to ease it a bit with some foreplay
>she's ecstatic, and even starts kicking her leg while fingering her
>as soon as I stop she runs around and freaks out because it feels so good
>tried actually fucking her, but she wouldn't stay still and was too tight
>just kept fingering her for about an hour
>too tired to keep going so I quit
>she's relieved, and lets out a big sigh while curling up beside me, then we fall asleep together
>never leaves my side anymore when I go to visit her
That's about it.
>>710416763
Cool.
Although, when you said "literal dogfucker" I expected more actual fucking than just the foreplay you describe. It sounds like you got to third base.
>>710417408
Dogs are much tighter than humans. I've managed to stick my dick in her a couple inches, but that's about it. I have cum in her before, but still not truly fucked her.
>>710417498
>have cum in her before
Nice, congrats. That sounds fun
>>710417676
It is. I wish she was bigger though, and enjoyed it. I'd love to truly fuck her one day.
>>710417209
I'll post what I have, but /r/ing more cows
>>710417855
>>710417953
>>710418044
Wasn't that posted earlier?
>>710418147
>>710418198
Probably. Still a good pic though.
>>710416763
That's a really disgusting story. I'm ashamed, that no one called you out on this yet. You sick fuck.
>>710419186
So if I replace the female character of that story with a human then it would be perfectly fine?
better than tinder! plenty of horny sluts of your city on http://bsft.fr/si9o
>>710417833
That's hot anon. I hope you do and regularly pump her womb full of your cum.
>>710419186
where do you think you are, hon?
>>710419345
Thank you, kind anon. I wish the same for you.
>>710419186
No it isn't disgusting you fag. It's hot and totally normal, so fuck off with your projecting your personal hangups on others.
>>710419468
Alright, relax. He's just some fag that doesn't understand. Let him be stupid. It doesn't bother me any.
>>710419186
Would you "call out" a bum on the street with "will work for food" sign?
Bump
>>710419293
The point is, that animals and children can't choose. You are the one, who chooses for them and that is completely wrong when we talk about having sex.
>>710419910
>eyes censored
>>710419468
Ask a random who really belongs to the outside world wether this is considered normal.
>>710419945
>animals and children can't choose
Not even reading past that. If she couldn't choose then she wouldn't growl when I try to stick my dick in her because it hurts her, but she's obviously okay with foreplay. Checkmate, faggot.
>>710419993
To block out the lewdness.
>>710419945
Oh, please, go fuck yourself, hypocrite. While you are waxing philosophical about consent, think about your own hypocricy when you eat a fucking burger, or you know what? Visit your local pound and think about how much "consent" is sought for those feral dogs when they are rounded up and executed or forcefully sterilized if they're lucky.
give me a fucking break you idiot.
>>710420155
At this point she became imprinted on you due to your actions in the past you told us about.
>>710420318
This.
If we want to further prove you this guy wrong, I'll post this for him to read. It never fails to immediately shut them up.
>>710420139
>normal
There's no such thing. Only pansy-ass pussies with nothing but a stale appeal to an authority that doesn't' give a fuck about them, me, or you.
>>710420318
I'm a vegetarian, dumbass.
>>710420431
Sure, buddy. Because she clearly couldn't bite my fucking face off if she didn't want to. As a matter of fact, she actually growled at me last time I tried fingering her which was last week. Wanna keep going? I like proving retards wrong.
>>710420518
So you don't pay taxes, faggot? where do you think the money comes from to run the city, county, and state pounds? Go argue with them like the autist you are instead of attacking innocent people here.
Go picket a dairy farm for all the fuck I care you deluded nincompoop
ugh already went through this whole consent argument once today
why is it such a hard concept to grasp that animals can seek out sex on their own prerogative, and are also able to let you know if they don't like something without speaking in fucking english jesus
>>710420819
Because "muh morals" and "muh society".
>>710420892
Oh, and can't forget "muh laws".
>>710420590
Yes, of course.
How do you know it simply bowed down to you? Why do you think it is the same kind of being consent, if you can't properly communicate?
>>710420819
>why is it such a hard concept to grasp
It's not. The people aren't even thinking. They are reacting from internalized brainwashing. It feels good to attack people and that's why people do it so much even for no other reason.
It feeds their ego and makes them feel superior. It's all about reactionary ego. The people that actually think about it, either don't say anything or join the party eventually.
>>710421054
Of course, it was completely ignored. Read this shit because I'm sick of arguing about this topic. >>710420464
better than tinder! plenty of sexy sluts of your city on http://bsft.fr/si9o
>>710420980
>>710420892
yeah, I don't give a shit about any of that.
That's literally make believe. It's constructed bullshit by other people who don't know me and should have no power over me.
>>710421054
And yes, they do communicate. In the form of growling and biting your fucking face off, or panting and moaning in pleasure. Dumbass. Communication isn't limited to words, idiot.
>>710421288
>literally disproves every single argument related to zoophilia
>"yeah, I don't give a shit"
Yep, I knew it.
>>710421054
Just shut up if you can't even think it through logically. Goddamn dude, have you ever even have sex? Do you think people sign a fucking contract or something?
>>710421378
I think I fucked up that reply. Whatever, I'm too tired and don't care.
>>710420464
You know, I don't believe throwing pedos under the bus is the answer to justifying your furry shit, but the fact remains that the "consent" argument against bestiality is entirely fucking absurd because we don't ask "consent" from the farm animals before we slaughter them or forcefully sterilize them or mutilate and experiment on them for our convenience. I think the argument should focus on that and not some shady "Well at least we're not this bad" when it's just as contentious that all pedo is inherently bad or wrong. It isn't.
>>710421564
It's cool man, I could tell it was a mistake. no worries.
>>710421804
Good job, you missed the entire point.
>>710421143
You simply could not regulate it. How do you want to know, wether an animal was actual misused afterwards? Ask it? There may be rare cases when they „want“ it, but it is wrong nonetheless, because there is no way of protecting animals, if that would be allowed.
>>710421945
>protecting animals
Yeah, and killing them en masse and grinding them into sausage is JUST FUCKING FINE, AMIRITE?
can you not feel the tangible levels of absurd hypocrisy?
>>710421945
when poultry farmers are required to get informed consent from their chickens, you might have a leg to stand on in your rant, but as it is you sound deluded as fuck.
>>710422125
I tell you -- once again -- I'm a vegetarian and I think animals deserve the right to be protected from vile humans. Stop that Whataboutism
>>710422258
these chickens should not exist in the first place
>>710422289
It doesn't negate my point at all. You apparently don't' give a shit about protesting animals getting eaten, but heaven forbid someone fingered one at some point while also providing it a long and healthy life with free food, board and medical care.
Or go protest your county pound, fag. Get off your high horse, it's an absurd argument that "they can't consent" when no consent is required for everything else we fucking do to them.
>>710422289
>I'm a vegetarian
Yeah, we can tell. You're all fucking retarded and delusional. Are you also a conspiracy theorist?
>>710422845
I do. Can't you fucking read?
Besided that it's completely wrong to bring this up, because another bad thing doesn't make this bad thing good.
>>710423197
It's not a bad thing though.
anyway, you just don't understand. You're out of your element here.
>>710422960
But a dog fucker is a smart human being, isn't it?
If you don't have any arguments left use an ad hominem.
better than tinder! plenty of horny sluts of your city on http://bsft.fr/si9o
>>710423526
I already proved you wrong, dumbfuck >>710420464
I explained why we can't allow zoophilia. Doing it nonetheless is breaking this moral law.
So yes, it is a bad thing.
How do you think, we should protect animals from misuse otherwise?
>>710423872
Morals are made up bullshit by people who want to feel superior to others. Get off your moral high horse, faggot. Or would it be hurting it to be riding it because you're an evil human on a weak, vulnerable animal?
>>710423872
By the way, you didn't mention shit about me calling you out on being a conspiracy theorist so I take it I was correct. Do you also think you have a "gluten allergy" and dislike GMO's?
>>710424040
Morals are the reason, why people like you are not immediatley killed.
>>710424288
No because I carry a fucking knife everywhere I go, and will carry a gun as soon as I turn 21. And who's going to kill me? The police? Because I'm 100% you're a dumbfuck "liberal" (i.e. fascist) who dislikes guns. So go ahead, fuckboy. Try me.
>>710424277
Whataboutism and ad hominem at once! You outdone yourself.
These things have nothing to do with this discussion, but if you feel better: No I don't believe in these things.
>>710424424
I don't want you to be killed, because I like morals. You should simply be grateful and start accepting that not everyone can do as he/she likes.
>>710424517
How many times do I have to direct you to this image before you stop saying "AD HOMINEM! AD HOMINEM!"? I've already proved you wrong, so the least you could do is argue back on that topic as well.
>yfw
>>710424731
>I don't want you to be killed, because I like morals
>Morals are the reason, why people like you are not immediatley killed.
Good God you're one idiotic human being.
Any more Animal Fuckers ITT?,if so please post your stories.
>>710424749
How did you do that? With that strange youtube comment?
>>710424942
You mean the one crafted by a well-respected man who is smarter than any of us, and has a fanbase of 500k, and makes YT videos explaining objectively what is wrong and right with a movie? Yeah I think he knows what he's talking about.
>>710424749
>>My morals are superior to yours. I proved it to you.
>>Morals are not real
Pussy!
>>710425130
By the way, this is his channel.
https://www.youtube.com/user/YourMovieSucksDOTorg/videos?sort=p&view=0&flow=grid
Dude is clearly a pretty big deal, and is pretty fucking smart, so I'm going to take his word over a dumbass that can't even answer a simple question.
>>710425602
He hasn't give an answer on how to overcome the problems of the legalisation though. That means the point is still valid.
>>710423872
Buttplugs.
>>710426098
>ignores every single thing mentioned
>"b-but he hasn't mentioned this one thing"
Whatever, buddy.
And this is my favorite one right here. Did you know that fucking a dead deer is 100% legal? That's right, I can hit a deer in my truck, throw it in the bed, take it home, and fuck it, and there will be no legal repercussions because a dead deer can't be classified as an animal due to the fact that it isn't animate. So what about that law argument?
>>710426489
Just because the law is inconsistent (it is) that doesn't mean certain things became magically ok. The point is still valid!
No meat, no fur, no animal fucking! They are all bad, the only difference is that the last one is not allowed (yet). Would be better if all are prosecuted.
>>710427027
No it isn't valid. I've proven you wrong on every single account, so I'm done here. Enjoy being a retard, fucking cuk.
Oh right, I always forget that sex is inherently evil and only traumatizes those things which are subjected to it
puritanism
is
an
outdated
system
of
morality
FUCK
it was outdated as soon as they thought it up, it just doesn't make sense
sex is a necessary part of (much of) multi-cellular life
it feels good
there is nothing wrong with it
most animals seem to have that figured out
why haven't you figured it out yet?
the entire point of suppressing sexuality is for political control over population dynamics
read a fucking book, jesus
>>710427664
Thank you. A round of applause to you.
>>710427252
Ok, you need a repititition?
>>710421945
>You simply could not regulate it. How do you want to know, wether an animal was actual misused afterwards? Ask it? There may be rare cases when they „want“ it, but it is wrong nonetheless, because there is no way of protecting animals, if that would be allowed.
You did nothing, to prove me wrong. Your youtube guy doesn't gives us an answer to that, he simply avoids the question.
The statement "I proved you wrong already" doesn't came true if you only repeat it again and again.
>>710427664
I did.
Do you know Kants Categorical imperative from Critique of Practical Reason?
I like to extend it to not only people but every living being.
