Less guns = less gun violence.
sit back and watch the douche baggery commence. :)
shameless self bump
on the side it says Australia, so wouldn't it just be easier to tell Australia to stop making so many guns?
nice meme thread
u won't be laughing when ahmeds and jamals start knocking on your door
OP is wrong, but he's entitled to his opinion.
Only way to stop gun violence is education for those inclined to learn and confiscation from those who cannot or will not. Then you stop production of firearms. Eventually, there will be no guns to use, as the vast majority who still want to use them (mostly dindus) do not have the necessary intelligence to manufacture or jury-rig them.
In an ideal world of course. None of these will ever happen, but it's a fun little thought experiment.
Have a really nice weekend, everyone.
>>709756828
Yes, and less knives = less knife violence
Less baseball bats = less baseball bat violence
Less golf clubs = less golf club violence
Your point is obvious and meaningless. What you really need to prove is less guns = less overall violence, which is an idea that is consistently proven wrong.
>>709758922
you just agreed that less guns = less gun violence. :)
>>709758650
false premise. :)
>>709759204
you're another who agreed that less guns = less gun violence. :)
>>709759330
Yes, I explicitly agreed and then explained why that's a meaningless correlation.
>>709756828
You're goddamn right boy
>>709759435
you agreed, then gave an unsupported opinion. :)
>>709759501
> Unsupported opinion
No, I simply stated what YOU have to prove for your point to carry any weight. The onus is on you to support your own opinion.
>>709759633
why agree with something that is meaningless? you ain't too terribly bright. :)
>>709756828
Less fast food = less heart disease, which accounts for 25 percent of the yearly deaths in America, compared to the laughable 6 percent of deaths by gun.
>>709759256
In a way, yes it does, but also no. It's not that simple. I just gave a more comprehensive answer.
>>709758922
Just another gun grabber.
>>709756828
*Fewer guns = less gun violence (except for govt. officials who still have guns)
Less guns = Less violence but if we ban all guns that doesn't mean that bad guys can't get guns, they can still buy them illegally.
>>709759716
Do you agree that the sky is blue?
Does that have any implication on gun laws?
By the way, 3/10 for making me reply so many times.
>>709759790
>Then you stop production of firearms
less guns. :)
>>709759889
straw man. :)
>>709756828
So what about the criminals they won't obey it in the first place so the civilians are defense less. Dumbass
>>709756828
Less gays = less gay violence
This is kind of a stupid way of saying anything and I'm not sure what point you are making.
>>709759938
your fallacy is: straw man. :)
Identity > Culture > Politics
>>709760035
not the topic. i like how you signed your post as "dumbass" :)
>>709760036
it's ok. just come on out of the closet. :)
>>709759948
I don't understand what you want to hear. Less guns is a blanket term, implying less guns overall. Guns don't do damage by themselves, it's the people without scruples who use them to kill.
A hammer can kill millions of people just as much as a pistol can, but whoever wields the hammer decides if it does or does not.
Less people = less gun violence is a more apt term. Therefore, we should all try to kill as many people as possible so we fix this problem. It's for the good of all!
>>709756828
>no people=no crime
Launch the nukes jarvis.
>>709760175
But that's where I keep my guns...
>>709760218
we're not talking about hammers. we're talking about guns. less guns = less gun violence. :)
>>709760039
If you're suggesting that you weren't trying to make an argument in support of gun control measures that would reduce the number of guns then sure, that's a strawman, but then that brings up the question: what the fuck is your point?
>>709760234
i'd suggest a nice, strong safe. :)
>>709756828
You can replace the word "gun" with any word and see the stupidity in this statement.
>Less lions = less lion violence.
>>709760310
you don't read so well, do you.
my point is: less guns = less gun violence. :)
>>709760403
see? you agree with me. :)
>>709759938
Science tells you that oxygen, hydrogen and nitrogen are colorless gasses. Science also teaches you the blue in the sky is just the way light is bouncing off the atmosphere. So, no, the sky isn't blue. Since you are going to go by just what you see, and there are a bunch of dumb asses like you who wont study the facts, yes, it will have implications on gun laws.
>>709760305
Then you are correct, sir/ma'am.
Just hope you can use these to argue your point clearly and properly to others who claim otherwise. Don't be one of those who wants to take guns away from regular people. Most gun violence is done by criminals and dindus, so target them appropriately.
>>709760414
*Fewer guns
>>709760403
That statement is also true.
Ever since St George slayed a dragon in the UK, dragon attacks have fallen drastically. No one even carries a bow these days in England.
>>709760305
https://www.google.com/amp/www.breitbart.com/big-government/2013/01/03/fbi-more-people-killed-with-hammers-and-clubs-each-year-than-with-rifles/amp/?client=ms-android-verizon
>>709760495
i'm not sure what that has to do with what i posted, but it's a nice straw man. :)
>>709756828
I see you started early
>>709760305
>>709760580
see? you agree, also :)
>>709757750
it says austria you dense cunt
lrn2read
>>709760605
not sure what that has to do with OP
>>709760659
Jesus, Oh Dae-su's been busy
>>709760414
Just to be clear, you're suggesting that your "point" that less guns = less gun violence is not intended to imply anything about gun control legislation and that you are presenting this "point" knowing that it is meaningless in the context of gun legislation, just because reasons, and you have no objective if accomplishing anything by stating your "point?"
>>709760717
good job. want a biscuit?
I agree, less gun means less violence, take Brazil for example, after the gun grab the violence ended almost instantly and is now the most pacific country to ever have existed ever.
>>709760717
BAN ASSAULT HAMMER NOW
>>709760811
no one mentioned gun legislation, except you.
you're displaying the douche baggery i suggested would happen in OP :)
>>709758650
I wouldn't be laughing, I'd usually just hand them the money and take whatever food I ordered from them.
>>709760835
"gun violence" you fucknut :)
>>709760907
Alright, have fun trolling.
>>709761009
i am.
you took the bait. :)
>>709760791
I'm just pointing out how some faggots are all scared of guns when they have bigger problems. With heart disease and hammers doing more harm, it seems that the only reason to go after guns is to keep people from defending themselves.
>>709756828
You're correct. :)
>>709761092
nobody mentioned any fear of guns. why did you?
>>709760828
I want you gun grabbing faggots to give it a fucking rest. Go shut down McDonald's or something.
>>709761206
what makes you think i'm a gun grabber?
>>709760845
I have a fully automatic hammer.
>>709761191
When you liberal types start spouting shit like less gus = whatever bullshit, it's usually some pansy who got pts from watch a Rambo movie. Don't let your fear rule you, fag.
>>709761255
Your blanket statement gives you away.
>>709761607
why so much anger?
i'm not a liberal
i'm not a pansy
i've seen Rambo several times
nobody mentioned fear, except you. telling. very telling indeed. :)
>>709761677
you assume facts not in evidence. :)
>>709760951
Does it matter if you're being stabbed to death or shot to death?
>>709761867
say, that's a nice straw man. :)
>>709756828
>>709756828
Ban guns = High crime rate involving possession of illegal firearms.
>>709762002
second has already been infringed. nothing to do with OP :)
>>709762095
less guns = less gun violence. :)
>>709762078
not sure what this has to with OP, but thank you.
>>709756828
Criminals break laws. They're not going to listen to gun laws. They'll be able to shoot up a crowd and nobody would b able to defend themselves
>>709762336
nobody mentioned gun laws, except you. :)
>>709762382
Fine less people with guns the more the insane people would get to shoot regular people unable to defend themselves
>>709762468
that's your unsupported opinion. :)
>>709762501
No that's just obvious
>>709762505
excellent idea...just don't leave too big of a mess for someone else to clean up. :)
>>709762609
with less guns, less likely "insane people would get to shoot regular people"
be less dumb, please. :)
>>709756828
I ll cut your fucking throat with my butter knife
>>709762738
no you won't. you're a pussy. :)
>>709762717
The few who do would be able to shoot anyone they please
:) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :) :)
>>709762865
prove it
>>709756828
>>709762952
Thats just obvious logic and common sense
>>709757750
we need em for the bloody drop bears
>>709763136
>but anon, we're talking about gun violence! Not actual crime rates!
>>709760835
NOT A PACIFIC COUNTRY DUMB FUCK
>>709763265
you're arguing that you're more likely to get shot with less guns in circulation and less likely to get shot with more guns in circulation.
you really want to talk about logic and common sense?
>>709763136
does that graphic account for armed robberies, muggings, or any other crime committed while using a firearm that doesn't necessarily result in a homicide?
>>709756828
For those of you who don't speak pidgin English, the OP is soliciting debate on the subject:
'Fewer guns = less gun violence'
>>709763388
Guns in the hands of the public is the ultimate form of a nation's checks and balances. People will get shot. Deal with it. It's mostly just niggers shooting each other anyway.
>nice bait tho, I like discourse
>>709763388
If someone were to shoot anyone in a crowd everyone around them would be able to shoot them right there before they kill more people. Less guns and the public wouldn't be able to defend each other like that
>>709763604
LOL! nice straw man. :)
>>709763656
nope, dope. try again. :)
>>709756828
as long as criminals can get guns from other sources than the official market there can be no such simple thing as less guns = less gun violence.
>>709756828
Less niggers = less gun violence.
>>709763363
they swapped sides with peru
>ITT: Op is a dense cunt
>>709759204
fuck look at this this guy wanting to ban everything kek ban knifes and golf clubs fucking democrats, whats next?
>>709763781
>as long as criminals can get guns from other sources
that's why i suggested "less guns = less gun violence" :)
>>709763837
but enough about your mom. :)
>>709763660
You're trolling isn't that good tbh
Your logic is less guns = less gun violence QED :) :3
If you look at cities like Chicago with (last time I checked) over 550 homicides this year and some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. If people don't like guns move to The People's Republic of Kalifornia.
>>709763763
I just proved my point are you 11 just saying some dumb shit again like no you're wrong and continuing to stay chained to your ideas. Forget it even if I obviously am right you're just stubborn
>>709763898
:):):):):):):):):):):):):):)
>Less guns = less gun violence.
wrong, it's
Less niggers = less gun violence.
>>709764057
Pretty much
>>709763980
>>709763898
Definitely 11
>>709763942
we're talking about the number of guns in circulation...not gun laws. if there aren't any guns in chimpcago, how is there so much gun violence?
nobody said anything about not liking guns
>>709763980
the only point you have is atop your head.
do you often fantasize about 11 year olds? :)
>>709764057
>Less niggers = less gun violence.
wrong, it's
Less white people = less gun violence
>>709764057
It's fewer for fuck's sake, why can the average Ameritard not speak even one language fluently?
Fewer guns , fewer niggers, etc.
>>709764233
it's an informal board. lighten up, francine
>>709756828
I psrtially agree with you OP.
1.
Take guns out of the hands of people who commit gun violence, and there will be less gun violence. The most practical way of doing this is longer prison sentences. Build more prisons. People need to be put away for life. They can't commit more gun crimes when they are in prison.
So yes, less guns (in the hands of criminals), means less gun violence.
2.
But, I own a lot of guns, and I am not finished buying them. Most gun "nuts" like me own multiple guns, yet we commit the least crime. Every time we buy a gun, we actually decrease the percentage of guns used in gun crimes.
>>709763136
why the fuck does greenland have so many homicides
>>709764303
1. you agree with me
2. you can't prove any of that. :)
>>709763660
>straw man
Black people account for 12.6% of the US population, but commit more total crime against their own race than white people do against white people.
I.E. niggers killing niggers.
Are guns the problem, or black people?
>>709763876
so no legal drugs led to no drug abuse or drug related crimes or death ? because if less guns = less gun violence that should mean No drugs = no drug related crimes right ?
>>709764233
It's speak good, not fluently.
Also, your punctuation is wrong in that sentence in which you asked your question.
>>709764439
nothing to do with less guns = less gun violence. :)
>>709764475
straw man. :)
OP here....it's lunch time in my neck of the woods.
you girls have a nice afternoon displaying your douche baggery. :)
>>709764535
hey answer me, you can't just row back as something uneasy comes up
also why do swiss people have no gun related crimes, but a huge part of the population posesses guns ?
>>709764652
i said "less" you said "no" you're a liar and you love your straw man fallacies. have a nice day. :)
>>709764439
>mfw nigs make up 13% of US population
>mfw when they commit almost half of the murders
>>709756828
>>709756828
Hilary is gonna take away our guns. Rip usa
>>709764439
neither it's overpopulation, i say give everyone a gun and cull the human population
>>709764490
Oh it has everything to do with gun violence. In fact, it's relevant to rape, beatings, and robbery. OP's statement is a hyperfocused, context-lacking idea and is useful only in a shitpost on 4chan.
>Enjoy your lunch cocksucker
>>709764788
same thing was said about Obama. hasn't happened yet.
>>709764793
and this is the reason we need more gun laws
>>709764847
>>709764788
Obama didn't have the power Shitlary will have with the SCOTUS being tipped pretty liberal.
>>709764705
calling me a liar for telling the truth is rude an a ad hominem.
also what about the swiss how did it fit in your argument ?
>>709756828
>Anon: *brings up valid point*
>OP: Prove it
>Anon: *proves it*
>OP: *completely disregards point to say some autist shit with a sarcastic smile to try to piss people off*
>>709764484
Troll harder.
Can't wait till all the cucks actually turn their guns in and I can just become ultra nigger
>>709764891
>implying that anon would even pass the NICS check.
>>709764927
Obama did have the power, but just proved to be a more lame-duck president. He did introduce some import bans related to firearms however. But yes, you are right. The most important issue is regarding the supreme court appointments that will be made in Clinton's term.
>>709756828
Dense op= obvious bait
>>709756828
I end everything in a :) too, because it is smug and makes my point somehow seem more valid. :)
Yeah OP you're right. It definitely comes down to the age old argument Safety Vs Freedom. The more free you and your countrymen are, the less safe you will be. The safer you want to be the more freedoms you and everyone around you must sacrifice. Everyone's preference will lie somewhere on the spectrum and it so happens that I'd rather have guns than have the increase of safety that comes with all or most the guns being removed. This is why you're allowed to vote for what you want.
>>709765106
I am agreeing with you. I may not like Trump but having a Clinton presidency will be detrimental to the SCOTUS
>>709756828
less niggers = less violence in general
/thread
>>709756828
OP delivers
>>709765388
Clinton will be four years of Ultra-Obama. She'll put him on the Supreme Court and make Biden SecState. We will be so fucked.
>>709765388
Absolutely. Personally I think Trump is retarded in both his slogans and demeanor. But still, Clinton wields the power of actually fucking the nation up royal. Trump takes my vote in November.
>>709765551
>>709765477
I early voted for Trump already. Glad to see this board isn't all assholes and we can have civil conversations.
I laugh when people tell me that hilary is best because she has. "Experience " doesn't mean it's good experience
>>709765551
Unless you're arguing with op because op is an immature faggot that learned politics from his autist parents
Less guns = less gun violence = more alive nigger; therefore less guns is bad.
Come get 'em, liberals
>>709759771
Not all.heart disease is from fast food, stupid fuck
