Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]
RandomArchive logo

Why did this building fall down?

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 199
Thread images: 43
File: 1449119778560.gif (2 MB, 320x240) Image search: [Google]
1449119778560.gif
2 MB, 320x240
Why did this building fall down?
>>
jet fuel
>>
>>703395377
Controlled demolition.
>>
>>703395377
Backed up toilets from a top floor Arby's.
>>
>>703395741
pure poetry
>>
File: WTFISTHISANDWHY.jpg (145 KB, 540x960) Image search: [Google]
WTFISTHISANDWHY.jpg
145 KB, 540x960
>>703395377
Money and power. Hope that helps.
>>
>>703395377
because Bush said it had to come down. It's where his families illegal financial transaction records were stored.
>>
Copyright issues with Tolkien
>>
>>703396123
that dude in red aint even ded,he just want hte pussy
>>
Building wanted to join in the fun
>>
>>703395377
Gravity
>>
File: suggesting.jpg (108 KB, 1277x851) Image search: [Google]
suggesting.jpg
108 KB, 1277x851
>>703395377
>>
>>703396278
I think they're homeless man
>>
>>703395377
Trump.
>>
File: SingerBuilding.jpg (2 MB, 3243x4670) Image search: [Google]
SingerBuilding.jpg
2 MB, 3243x4670
Better tell me why this building was demolished
>>
>>703395377
Pull it!

>falling....CRASH!!! BOOM!!!!!

Did you know the man who owned the twin towers had them insured for over a billion dollars in case such an attack took place only weeks before 9/11?

>The more you know!
>>
>>703396131
actually hard copies of the Enron and Worldcom scandals were housed there
>>
>>703397306
I know. that's why I posted what I posted.
>>
>>703395377
Something to do with dirty american halfwits...
Nobody cares.

Onward to a Chinese future...
>>
File: 9-11-2015.jpg (443 KB, 1061x750) Image search: [Google]
9-11-2015.jpg
443 KB, 1061x750
Hope God smites some more muslims this year.
>>
>>703395377
Clinton.
>>
File: Bana.jpg (116 KB, 960x960) Image search: [Google]
Bana.jpg
116 KB, 960x960
>>703398024
>>
File: images.jpg (9 KB, 240x210) Image search: [Google]
images.jpg
9 KB, 240x210
>>703395377
>>
File: 1469421063470.jpg (14 KB, 480x480) Image search: [Google]
1469421063470.jpg
14 KB, 480x480
>>703398838
>>
Read the NIST report, at least.
>>
>>703399992
>(((NIST)))
>>
>>703395377
gravity.
>>
>>703395377
it was hit by a metal ibeam dumb ass.
>>
File: 65WAT.jpg (22 KB, 567x567) Image search: [Google]
65WAT.jpg
22 KB, 567x567
>>703396790
Wat?
>>
File: 1445310353496.jpg (229 KB, 1099x1599) Image search: [Google]
1445310353496.jpg
229 KB, 1099x1599
>>
>>703397294
Renewed the policy, which in conspiracy land means he knew what was coming.

To the rest of us, it is just paying the bills.
>>
>>703395741

You won today sir
>>
Wasnt it controlled so the fire would spread or something?
>>
File: 1446722862680.gif (1 MB, 174x188) Image search: [Google]
1446722862680.gif
1 MB, 174x188
>>703399992
So a total symmetrical collapse at free fall speed into its own footprint because of office fires?
>>
>>703395377
juice
>>
There is a video/audio where the fire chief ordered all the fire crews to evacuate the building because they decided to "pull it"

I don't know why. The building structure looked pretty intact. It was absolutely recoverable, no need to pull it
>>
>>703396790
sew something else could be built there
>>
File: singer.jpg (335 KB, 569x700) Image search: [Google]
singer.jpg
335 KB, 569x700
>>703400384
hwat?
>>
>>703395377
You weren't supposed to notice that one fell down.
>>
File: 1447022093882.jpg (75 KB, 680x387) Image search: [Google]
1447022093882.jpg
75 KB, 680x387
>>
>>703395377
The hijackers got dubs.
>>
You won't belieb how many Americans don't know about this tower. Fucking dumb fucks.l

Y'all niggas need Trump.
Fuck crooked Hillary.
>>
>>703395377
patriarchy
>>
>>703401041
You obviously don't understand how much a single floor of a building weighs.
>>
>>703395377
because terrorism
>>
Because no dicks out for rombay
>>
>>703401730
too bad trump is only being use to distract us from Hilary
>>
>>703400802
Wrong. The WTC did not have insurance coverage for terrorism. Silverstein took out the policy for terrorism with a double indemnity clause just weeks before the 'attack'.
>>
File: r2009wtc7southview03.png (2 MB, 1183x1688) Image search: [Google]
r2009wtc7southview03.png
2 MB, 1183x1688
I'm gonna say maybe a goddamn fire on every floor.
>>
>>703402018
an office fire, really? yeah right, there wasnt even any jet fuel in that one,,,how can you be so retarded?
>>
>>703395377
>>703395599
>>703395899
>>703396199
>>703397400
>>703400144
>>703402000
Those dubs weight to much. The trips did the rest.
>>
>>703402018
>I'm gonna say maybe a goddamn explosive on every floor.
fify
>>
>>703402018
The fire was a problem, but the bigger problem was the sprinkler system being knocked out and damage to the bottom floors. After burning and weakening, the inside of the building collapsed and then the outside walls went with it.
>>
>>703402000
>unrest amongst radicals in the world
>gets insurance on a building which has already been targeted in a terrorist attack

Sounds pretty reasonable to me.
>>
Obviously it was built on an Indian burial mound
>>
>>703401397
And skrew the cultural heritage?
>>
>>703402143

You know what they say, where there is smoke, there is an secret government conspiracy to cover up the truth.
>>
>>703395741
Kek
>>
>>703401834
but all the weight would get burnt up by the fire dumbass haven't you ever watched wood logs burn up?
>>
File: niggawhats.jpg (77 KB, 607x773) Image search: [Google]
niggawhats.jpg
77 KB, 607x773
>>703400384
>>
>>703395741
>>
Republicans
>>
fucking morons when the first plane hit its wing full of jet fuel flew off and landed in this building and caused it to collapse into its own footprint
>>
File: goyim.jpg (93 KB, 700x777) Image search: [Google]
goyim.jpg
93 KB, 700x777
>>703400562
how u think that
>>
File: MTE1ODA0OTcyMDYyMTgwODc3.jpg (129 KB, 1200x1200) Image search: [Google]
MTE1ODA0OTcyMDYyMTgwODc3.jpg
129 KB, 1200x1200
In 1998, President Bill Clinton couldn't hide a blowjob in the oval office from a fat intern.

How could you think something on this scale would remain secret?

How fucking retarded are you?
>>
>>703401282
If you think a gubberment conspiracy would be so well known that they'd have a bat chief in on it, you are truly retarded
>>
>>703402360
I agree that's not suspicious, but why'd the other building come down?
>>
>>703402960
It hasn't you dumb kike shill
>>
>>703402960
>remain secret
There are people literally talking about it in this thread rn.
>>
File: 1438740893483.jpg (38 KB, 400x440) Image search: [Google]
1438740893483.jpg
38 KB, 400x440
>>703399992
>>
My more moderate conspiracy theory about the World Trade Center is they fell down for the same reason the "unsinkable" Titanic sunk.

If we weren't able to inspect the wreckage of the Titanic and just had to go off the blue prints we would never know how it happened, but because we did we saw they fucked up the construction with shit metal and the wrong rivets. The WTC buildings were designed to withstand hits from jetliners and no steel frame building ever collapsed from fire alone... but do we actually know they built it as it was designed? Sadly, they started hauling away and destroying the metal before they even finished searching for survivors.
>>
>>703395377
internal job
>>
>>703399999
>>
>>703396532
/thread
>>
File: 1473553934498.jpg (87 KB, 953x960) Image search: [Google]
1473553934498.jpg
87 KB, 953x960
Looks like controlled planned demolition. What country is this from is that a rare thing or what?
>>
Burning debree from tower one collapse started a fire on 11 floors of the other building. Because towers one and two collapsed water pressure in the area was nil. Eleven floors burning with no fire suppression let the office furniture create a super hot fire that caused the buildings collapse. BTW, the amount of explosives required for a controlled demolition would cause an explosion of at least 140 decibels. Everyone would have heard it.

Go put the tinfoil hat up your ass and scrub your prostate till you bleed to death.
>>
Controlled demolition, seriously, you can't say otherwise. Buildings are built to withstand office fire temperatures, only explosions could have done what happens in said gif. Conspiracy aside, that is textbook controlled demolition
>>
File: 1458370127049.jpg (130 KB, 554x600) Image search: [Google]
1458370127049.jpg
130 KB, 554x600
>>703397294
>>
>>703403618
Don't you think that is strange?
>>
File: 1468896597756.jpg (50 KB, 610x416) Image search: [Google]
1468896597756.jpg
50 KB, 610x416
>>703399992
>>
>>703402970
You can use Google, fuck face. I watched it on tv when they decided to pull the building.
>>
>>703404033
People did hear explosions anon.
>>
Domolition crew hired to make it look like terrorism
>>
>>703403010
It was built above an electrical substation and a subway. There was also a large amount of fuel stored in the lowest floor.

The design was not typical. The steel for the floors was smaller than what was in the other towers. Fire at that low of a level going unstopped for as long as it did is a death sentence for a building.

Also 'Fireproofing' is not impervious to heat. It protects the steel until the fire is resolved, which in this case it was not. There was a lack of water and manpower as firefighters were more concerned with saving lives.

So to answer your question: a mixture of terrorism and confusion brought that building down.
>>
>>703403618
The thing about the rivets and metal was disprove. For their time they were perfectly acceptable and even when subjected to massive pressures/stresses many of them remained intact.
The comparison between the WTC and the Titanic ends at the fact they were both destroyed by things they were designed to withstand.
It has nothing to do with shoddy construction, because both were made very well, it has to do with the damage being far more than ever anticipated.
For the Titanic, six or seven compartments being ripped open when the limit was four, for the WTC a 767 hitting it at full speed instead of a 727 or 707 at cruising speed.
The fact both the Titanic and the WTC survived long enough to save many people are testaments to their strength.
>>
File: image.jpg (71 KB, 640x640) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
71 KB, 640x640
>>703401041
It didn't fall into it's footprint. None of the World Trade Center collapses did.
>>
File: 2013wtfacts19fp.jpg (55 KB, 640x400) Image search: [Google]
2013wtfacts19fp.jpg
55 KB, 640x400
>>703404033
>BTW, the amount of explosives required for a controlled demolition would cause an explosion of at least 140 decibels. Everyone would have heard it.
>what is nanothermite
>>
>>703401282
trapped heat from the dozen burning floors eventually overheats the concrete covering the steel beams

this concrete is highly heat resistant compared to them and would take hors if not days to cool down compared to the metal

after a point the concrete essentially become an over for the beams and not amount of water will save the building from collapse
>>
>>703398838
ha this must be what it feels like when a japaneese guy sees a tattoo that says hot and sour soup on some bimbo's lower back or neck.
>>
File: FuckYouAll.jpg (474 KB, 634x778) Image search: [Google]
FuckYouAll.jpg
474 KB, 634x778
>>703401730
I realize that alot of Mark Dice's vids are cringy... but he seemed to be running into random people on the streets of San Diego who...

>Did not know which year 9/11 happened.
>Did not know who osama bin laden was.
>Had never heard of al qaeda.
>Didn't know what the "War On Terror" was.

We're fucked. Fuck everything.
>>
>>703404357
>Fire at that low of a level going unstopped for as long as it did is a death sentence for a building.
Do you have any other examples of fire giving a death sentence to a building?
>>
>>703395596
>steel beams
>>
>>703401282
"pull it" referred to getting the men and equipment out, not the building being demolished. The equipment showed the outer wall was shifting and slowly moving, indicating imminent structural failure.
>>
>>703404455
Are we just supposed to believe those pictures are debris found in the WTC wreckage? You all demand evidence for everything.. except when it promotes your agenda.
>>
File: 1444285294042.jpg (255 KB, 600x636) Image search: [Google]
1444285294042.jpg
255 KB, 600x636
>>703401869
you mean internal terrorism.
>>
>>703402288
are you fucking autistic.
>>
File: 5928896557_ce4da6d73e_o.jpg (337 KB, 1255x1400) Image search: [Google]
5928896557_ce4da6d73e_o.jpg
337 KB, 1255x1400
>>703404168
It's all extremely strange, yes. I used to be a full Truther, but that fell apart after the US's 2003 invasion of Iraq when they didn't find any WMDs. I remember asking why they wouldn't just plant them or otherwise say they found some when they didn't. An anon replied something like "Because they're not evil masterminds, they're incompetent retards."

Common wisdom says to never blame something on malice if it can be explained by incompetence. Maybe 9/11 was just a fuckup of Biblical proportions, and all the coverups afterward were just ass-coverage.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWiusdy1miI
>>
>>703395377
Gravity.
>>
>>703402960
Still butthurted about that I see, long live to our lady reptilian shillary.

$0.15 has been added to your account.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nmj6t51Wz8
>>
http://www.911myths.com/html/wtc7_damage.html

Building actually was damaged.
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iE9LTYHiknE
>>
File: shake.jpg (24 KB, 500x371) Image search: [Google]
shake.jpg
24 KB, 500x371
>>703403618
So you saying they crashed into an iceberg?
>>
File: image.jpg (796 KB, 1680x1050) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
796 KB, 1680x1050
>>703395377
Because you touch your self at night faggot
>>
>>703404689
Yes, but they are irrelevant since they were small structures and didn't have a full collapse. See the Alexis Nihon Plaza in Montreal.

Fire weakening the steel has a significant effect when you factor in the 100+ floors above it.

Also, just because something hasn't happened before doesn't mean it can't. You should really give up that mentality.
>>
>>703395377
It felt sad and had enough of life.
>>
>>703405996
When A happens many times without causing B, but then B happens three times in one day for the first time, it really makes you think.
>>
>>703405972
No, the Titanic was sunk using an experimental energy weapon adapted from alien technology.

Wait, nevermind. That's my brother's 9/11 theory.
>>
>>703401041
yes

for several hours, the trapped heat in the offices overheats the concrete covering the steel beams essentially turning the building into a blast furnace.

The structure weakened from the inside out, enough for a single floor to collapse on it's own weight. Immediately it gets the added momentum of several times it's weight in the form of other floors

result: concrete omelette
>>
>>703405828
What a happy coincidence.
>>
>>703403618
Two or three extremely important men died on that boat, they both/all opposed the Rockefellers and the federal reserve.

Look it up.
>>
>>703404455
>thermite
>explode
have you ever fucking seen a thermite reaction? It makes a lot of sparks, but doesn't really "explode" the way you think it does, and it doesn't cut through steel the way you think it does either.
>>
>>703403618
It wasn't thought that the fire insulation would be so easily blown off the interior metal by the molten ball of hot fury that is a newly exploding jetliner, tough to make insulation that tough ig man.
>>
>>703395377
Looks photo shopped to me
>>
>>703406237
How often does A involve aircraft flying into the buildings? You say it happened three times, but it didn't. Fire alone only brought down one of the buildings. A very large building with a whole lot of fire.

But that isn't the full story. Damage to building 7 was reported before the collapse.
>>
>>703404455
>Tfw those are just shards of human shin bones
What an ass hole
>>
>>703406692
This is what I mean. You're talking about theories on how the fire proofing was subverted, but that's skipping a step. We don't know if the fire proofing was properly applied as per the design plans, or if it was even applied at all. The wreckage was never analyzed so we'll never know.

We know there was asbestos in the air, though, despite there not supposed to be any at all. In at least one area someone took a cost saving short cut thinking they could get away with it.
>>
>>703404689
Fires make buildings fall down every single day on this planet you know.
>>
>>703406692
I work in construction, so I've had plenty of experience with that shit. It is very sticky, fireproofing doesn't just fall off. But when we have to use a beam clamp to hang something, you just poke at it with a screwdriver and it comes right off.

I can't even imagine how fireproofing could be made to stand up to any significant impact.
>>
File: lie.jpg (60 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
lie.jpg
60 KB, 600x450
>>703404455
soooo retarded anon, so retarded...
>>
I've been digging for a bit, and I've come to the conclusions that unlike previously assumed by the general public, the Jews are actually not to blame for this one.

If you look at who hijacked the planes, you start to notice a pattern: They're all Muslims. Now, I don't want to make any broad accusations or anything, but I think the Muslims did it.
>>
>>703407470
>Muslims did it
That doesn't stop a determined Truther. People theorize that they were allowed to do it by people who were in a position to stop them. Similar to how interests in the US provoked and exposed themselves to the Pearl Harbor attack because they needed to join WW2.
>>
>>703401397
i see what you did there
>>
>>703404721
can't melt?!
>>
>>703405460
Begging you to have sex.
>>
There was a fire burning on the inside of that building for over an hour at that point. Also you can't see it in OP's angle but a small structure on top of the building collapses first, hitting the center of the weakened roof and making it collapse. The building was designed with a central support structure instead of using the outside walls as loadbearing as well so it collapsed
>>
File: 4L_4KStPH3c.jpg (102 KB, 555x741) Image search: [Google]
4L_4KStPH3c.jpg
102 KB, 555x741
>>703396199
Kek
>>
>>703395377
explosives put into the right place, detonated simultaneously by the government
>>
Just think of how many normies died that day.
>>
File: 1445105481710.jpg (140 KB, 960x874) Image search: [Google]
1445105481710.jpg
140 KB, 960x874
>>703407470
>They're all Muslims
>>
>>703395377
It was drunk desu.
>>
>>703407230
Shity building then. But then that perfect fall..
>>
>>703409802
What makes it a perfect fall? That it fell down somewhat straight? Which way do you think all of that weight is going to go... sideways?

Why would it go in any direction other than down?

>well it all fell at the same time/rate!

That's because buildings are designed to not come apart.
>>
>>703401834
>>703406522
Hard to believe dumb americans actually believe this?

Think you guys need to go to school to see how buildings ACTUALLY work.
>>
>>703401648
didnt this guy also talk about the kennedy assassination being completed by the driver and he even had new footage from the famous video but with the edges of the frames restored by specialists that show the driver shooting him in the head with a .45? that guy was legit and he also was killed.
>>
File: teluwat.jpg (18 KB, 245x214) Image search: [Google]
teluwat.jpg
18 KB, 245x214
They accidently the whole thing I guess
>>
>>703411396
>edges of the frames restored by specialists
ah yes, "bullshit we edited in but called differently to make retards like Anon fall for it".
>>
>>703410960
I have had a hand in the construction of buildings. Steel core, prefab shell, reinforced poured concrete, open web... I know more about how buildings work than you could ever hope to know.

>using 'dumb americans' in a statement and ending said statement with a question mark
>implying you're not a complete dumbass.

You gave no relevant information to dispute my earlier statement. Do you know how much a single floor weighs? Of course you don't.
>>
>>703410864
Controled demolitions tend to fail. It just seems interesting that a fire can demolish a building so perfectly.
>>
>>703411870
You're thinking about it all wrong. The fire didn't pull down the building, gravity did. Gravity is pretty damn uniform.

The fire weakened the structure, and when it failed it pulled everything else down with it.
>>
>>703411870
>Controled demolitions tend to fail.

But not controlled demolitions of buildings struck by planes and mountains of debris, apparently.
>>
File: 1432428552074.jpg (6 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]
1432428552074.jpg
6 KB, 225x225
>>703412212
BEHOLD THE GUILTY ONE LADS!
>>
File: 1414782382261.jpg (23 KB, 300x295) Image search: [Google]
1414782382261.jpg
23 KB, 300x295
>>703412212
I can't believe this, it was you all this time...
>>
>>703412427
There was no jet fuel involved in building 7. This conversation is above your head. Go read a book.
>>
>>703404252
So you heard some audio and assumed it meant he knew the building was about to be asploded.....yeah you're a fucking genius
>>
>>703395377
Bc your gf lived for a day
>>
>>703411642
if it was an edit it was insanely well done considering this guy made these speeches in the early ninety's/late 80's. anyway that guy was legit and he was killed right after all this.
>>
File: office-with-cubicles.jpg (498 KB, 1280x960) Image search: [Google]
office-with-cubicles.jpg
498 KB, 1280x960
>>703402143
circle the parts not flammable
>>
>>703412567
>The fire weakened the structure
Tell me again, where that fire came from?
>>
>>703412212
do office fires burn at a sufficient temperature to weaken I-beams? never heard of a concrete and steel building falling down from a fire.
>>
jet fuel
>>
I like how none of this shit matters since the pentagon hit is too fake not to laugh so it's de facto pre planned american made
>see that military HQ
>yeah, the one we hittin boss
>don't crash into it, that would cause too much damage
>now I want you to fly around it, thats right
>aaaarooound now go low
>good good
>now crash into that area under "renovation" for minimal damage
>gj. private
>>
>>703395377
The us govt. needed to keep some secrets.
>>
>>703413268
oh you mean the billions of dollars that bush was about to get reamed about until the goldfish at the news outlets forgot all about it and it was never talked about ever again after? funny how it was the day before 9/11 happened.
>>
>>703413102
there was this little minor incident that might of caused some structure damage, something like 150 tons of metal moving at possibly 500 miles per hour

think it just bounced off tho
>>
>>703413081
>>703413102
See
>>703404357

I've already answered both of those questions.
>>
>>703413559
but building 7 wasnt even hit by a plane. did you not know that?
>>
File: 911=dubs get.jpg (84 KB, 620x388) Image search: [Google]
911=dubs get.jpg
84 KB, 620x388
>>703401727

true
>>
>>703413700
Not by a plane, but by a whole lot of debris.
>>
File: 1467095821034.gif (212 KB, 501x585) Image search: [Google]
1467095821034.gif
212 KB, 501x585
WOW SO MUCH DAMAGE CONTROL TRYING TO HIDE THE FACT IT WAS AN INTERNAL JOB

The FJBI and the JCIA must paying you all for the extra job, so you don't stand looking all day for pedos but also like to lie to people, nice...
>>
>>703404610
>> Fuck everything.
I believe the term is 'Fuck All'
>>
>>703414715

I think I hear some gang stalkers outside. You'd better go check.
>>
>>703402960
Bcause it is no secret. Unless u r retarded
>>
>>703402360
Um. Have any other buildings since been attack by terroists?
You're answer is no. Leave the internet.
(And no, The BLM movement doesn't count. Those aren't terrorist, that's an angry mob. )
>>
File: yanah.png (446 KB, 503x335) Image search: [Google]
yanah.png
446 KB, 503x335
>>703414668
whole lot my ass.
>>
File: 911 was a demolition.jpg (92 KB, 500x620) Image search: [Google]
911 was a demolition.jpg
92 KB, 500x620
>>703405485

Jews were the masterminds of 9/11.

Their payoff to Bush was that Bush got the political will to invade Iraq for their oil.

Faking WMDs in Iraq was entirely Bush's plot, and he screwed it up, as you point out. The Jews were OK with this because it made Arabs hate the US even more, taking heat off Israel.
>>
>>703395377
It an heroed
>>
the results are in

controlled demolition
>>
>>703406597
So the Titanic was an inside job too? Hook up an Amazon wish list and I get you a couple boxes of tin foil.
>>
>>703415480
Buildings are being targeted by terrorists all over the world. Do you not read any world news news?

Your ignorance is simply staggering. I won't use your childish statement and say that you should leave the internet. Instead you should explore it. Learn a little something.
>>
>>703404445
... Not sure if bait...
Looks like bait...

Did... Did you even watch the towers fall?
How old are you anon...?
>>
>>703415495
Bomb vs fire. Also you aren't taking scale into account. If building 7 had suffered a scaled amount of damage, it would have crumbled. 7 was so much larger than that building.
>>
>>703415675
>1.-usans created Alquaeda
>2.-Alquaeda goes rogue biting their hands
>3.-"Alquaeda planes two buildings"
>4.-usa blames Alquaeda for a terrorist atack
>kikes demands for the insurance for the two buildings
5.-Profit.
>>
building 7 was an hero. bush did cheney in the bathroom with a candlestick holder
>>
File: England.jpg (1 MB, 1841x1227) Image search: [Google]
England.jpg
1 MB, 1841x1227
>>703414961
That how the brits speak. Not british.
>>
>>703415480
>Have any other buildings since been attack by terroists?
>You're answer is no. Leave the internet.

holy shit condescending 13 year olds on /b/ is getting pretty condescending

ever heard the word "benghazi" you stupid ass fucking kid?
>>
>>703416248
something I dont know is if these buildings had sprinkler systems. do you know if building 7 had a sprinkler system.
>>
File: RussiaNO.jpg (257 KB, 1180x664) Image search: [Google]
RussiaNO.jpg
257 KB, 1180x664
>>703415480
What the christ is happening here?
>>
>>703404397
wasnt a part of the titanic also being that the flooding compartments were built with gaps at the top, so water could just flow over them and flood everything?
>>
>>703416875
I'm sure it did, but there was no water in the area. City pressure was nil. Those sprinkler systems work by pumping city water to increase pressure.
>>
>>703406669
thermite burning is an explosion
>>
>>703417091
the water pressure was gone one 9/11?
>>
>>703415947
What buildings? People inside buildings are targets.
Who, in their right fucking mind, would target a fucking building.
Jesus christ.
It was a flashy show and specticle to move your train of thought away from the fact that all the important targets of a would be 'true terrorist', where not at the twin towers that day.

Who throws their life away, to hit a target, that isn't at the target destination!

You don't just attack a building.

That's retarded. And you certainly don't steal planes, to crash them into buildings. Bombing them is much fucking easier.
>>
>>703417615
Between all the hydrants being opened, and the destruction of underground infrastructure when the buildings fell, water pressure was essentially 0.

NYU Downtown Hospital, located 5 blocks from the WTC, had to go into conservation mode because of fears of completely losing water.
>>
Because you need to read this, as this was designed and thought out by the same men who came to power months later. See who authored it and what it says aboutaerial needing a "new Pearl Harbor" by 2010 so that we can keep the war machine going and turn the country into a Soviet gulag.

http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
>>
>>703418243
About America**
>>
>>703418161
please enlighten me I want to be done with this crap forever can you source me this info?
>>
Ya'll retarded.
This bread is about building 7 falling, right?

Well listen up sprouts, building 7 fell, because the Goverenment needed to hide their money laundering. Billions of dollars!!

Has anyone hears of wikileaks?
I'm sure you have!
Anyone take the time to read through the website?
Probably not.
Too much dense material for your "overloaded" american brain to handle.
>>
>>703418360
http://web.archive.org/web/20050215113515/http://www.unbr.cz/groundzeroen.htm

Old archived page. Interesting read. There's not really any opinion in it, just a timeline of events. They talk about the water pressure in the utilities section.
>>
>>703418848
Claims without a shred of evidence. Such is the real tactic of the truthers.

Are you seriously implying that wikileaks is never wrong? I have seen false information on there in the past.
>>
>>703406669
thats the same most explosives
if you ignite them in air, it just burns, but put it in a pipe and the pipe will blow up, because of the expansion of the explosive
>>
>>703395377
nerve gas
>>
>>703420483
thermite has too slow of a reaction to be an explosive son.
>>
>>703422566
I dont know why I quoted you I meant to quote >>703421490
>>
>>703420483
Julian Assange prides himself on having a perfect track record when it comes to the documents and information that has been published by wikileaks.

There has never been any wrong, or misleading information, posted on their website.

Go watch Redacted Tonight on youtube.
Learn some shit. You plebs.
And then check their sources.
Do the work yourselves you lazy bigots.
>>
>>703423702
when did wikileaks prove 9/11 was an inside job?
>>703418848
Wikileaks has been nothing but fundraisers and articles about Assange for years now.
>>
Ok
Thread replies: 199
Thread images: 43


Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]
Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.