At this point it seems like it's just a trend/bandwagon to hate brock turner. There's plenty of worse cases all over the place. people just want something to vent their stress and anger at
>be me, le edgy /b/ memer xD
>hate feminininists and SJWs, because they are literally the devil!!!11!1
>find out about rich fratboy who can't handle his booze, said fratboy raped a chick or something
>HE MUZT BE INNOCENT!!1!1 THATR LYING SHE-WHORE IS PROBABLY A FEMINIST SJW
Step back for a second and understand that every person with a lick of common sense thinks the bitch was dumb to go and drink so much that she blacked out, and he was dumb for touching a really drunk bitch. whether or not he was too drunk to know what he's doing is irrelevant because if you get blackout drunk, you probably deserve whatever misfortune befalls you
>mfw le SJWZ, cucks and FEMINIST LIBRULZ are getting btfo by my superior intellect
Support Brock, edgemaster. He's a rapist. It isn't about race, income or anything else. He's a motherfucking rapist. He deserves to die in prison sucking gorilla cock. As does anyone who defends him.
This. People don't dislike him because hes a wealthy white male. He looks like a douche and did something bad that everyone else has the common sense not, no matter how drunk anyone, themselves included are.
Now I dont know him personally so I cannot attest to whether or not he is actually a douche however I can say that it's because of those aforementioned reasons people find it easy to dislike him immensely on an emotional level. "Yeah fuck him that creepy college rapist guy. Probably cant get laid anyway else LMAO"
>girl wants guy to finger blast her behind dumpster
>girl is blacked out as fuck and passes out
>guy is also blacked out and finger blasts her
>2 guys stumble upon him and now its rape because she said so
god bless america
>still doesn't know the difference between rape and sexual assault.
What's it like being 10-years-old?
People are whining about him being punished for being white/rich, etc.
As a law-abiding, taxpaying U.S. citizen and white man who works hard and is well off financially, I say to hell with this curly-haired cuntflap.
True, his behavior is accepted (and even embraced) by many dark-skinned cultures throughout the world, but to hell with those cultures and all the scum who support lawlessness.
Put the rapists in jail, let them get buttfucked, then electrocute the buttfuckers and be done with it. Bunch of pussies.
He got the same prison time a woman would get for the same crime.
Prove me wrong.
I think he did get verbal consent like he says. The girl he fingered was just some feminist who blacked out drunk and consented to it cuz she wanted her rape victim card. prove me wrong cunts.
>still doesn't know the difference between rape and sexual assault.
I bet the job applications go much smoother once you've cleared that up.
Rape - insertion of any body part, unwanted, into the body of another. I.E. a wet willie is technically rape. At least lol that's the UCMJ version. Article 120 is pretty stupid.
lol, no matter what this kid is ruined, his life is over. He will always be "Brock Turner Rapist".
That's because the media blatantly lies to get sheep like >>702978854 to follow their agenda and spread the propaganda.
nope, what happened doesn't matter, the media knows him as a rapeman, hes fucked.
>2 drunk college kids fool around, fingers involved
>OMG RAEP RAEP RAEP
>MUH WHITE CIS PRIVILEGE
>MUH RAEP CULTURE
Shut the fuck up.
An aristocratic American teenager who finger blasted a passed out chick and got caught. He did three months in jail, which many believe was a light sentence which was given due to him being a rich white kid.
yes. would you want to deal with two faggots bullshit? plenty of innocent people would run just for this reason alone. every time i see a cop pull a u turn for instance, i just run away because i dont want to deal with them.
>feel something hard
>remember inside everyone is a spoopy skeleten trying to get out
Nice agenda faggot.
Is what you said true? Yeah.
Is it still reasonable to hate him? Yeah again.
There are plenty of more severe cases out there, but he's still a fucking rapist, dude. I hate him AND I hate the people who do it more severely (admittedly more than I hate Turner).
Some serious samefagging going on in here.
Isn't it only rapists who make that distinction, between the particularities of sexual deviancy?
From what you say I imagine being convicted of sexual assault weighs less (among your circle of friends) than a conviction for rape.
In most of the rest of the world, a sex case is a sex case.
two faggots bullshit or two fellow students who can aid you in providing assistance.
>oh thank god you've arrived guys, this girl has blacked out, i think she's very sick.help me get her somewhere safe
>not reading the thread and realizing there's a bunch of people arguing with each other, thus generating numerous replies and no new posters
>being so fucking retarded that you expect the amount of posts in a thread like this to be reflective of the amount of people in the thread
damn ur smart /b/ good detective work haha xd kill yourself
what the fuck are you talking about? he didnt think he needed assistance, he was trying to fucking finger her. obviously when you are caught doing something taboo (which would be fingering in public) you'd want to gtfo. how is this hard for you to grasp
Cringe: The Thread
>ITT 2 cunts bitch about how theyre the only 2 cunts bothering to shitpost in this cancerous thread
>while insulting each other for remaining ITT to shitpost about shitposting
i see two likely scenarios that explain op's indignant fascination with this story
A) convicted under similar circumstances and is butt fucking mad to see the perpetrator roundly condemned, his own shame writ large
B) actually brock turner
>Isn't it only rapists who make that distinction, between the particularities of sexual deviancy?
Or just maybe, for some reason, the law also makes that difference too. But who knows why, maybe because there's a difference between sticking your dick in a girl and not.
>From what you say I imagine being convicted of sexual assault weighs less (among your circle of friends) than a conviction for rape.
presumably, the media loves blowing "rape" cases out of the water with their "expert" coverage.
>In most of the rest of the world, a sex case is a sex case.
What like some sandnigger country? Most of the world differentiates between rape and sexual assault also.
i think you're confused friend, read the nested comments again. i'm not excusing his behavior but poking holes in the theory that both parties passed out during a consensual act. kys btw
If you're a sex case - I don't very much want to hear about how many fingers you used or whether you ejaculated, about how it was a sex assault and not rape.. Your lawyers and parents might care..
To most people there's a cigarette paper's worth of difference. You're a sex case!
>the rest of the world differentiates between rape and sexual assault
pic related. crimes have harsher punishments based on severity. rapists, theoretically, get longer than molesters because of the nature of their crime. differentiation is key.
>o no im losing an argument on the internet
>better throw some buzzwords at him to make it look like im winning!
>you're a rapist!
>that sure showed him! HAHAHAHA
buzzwords? or high frequency words that most 18yo+ have seen many many times before?
>to most people without a law degree
in anons perfect black and white reality, youre either fucked or you got fucked, and no one needs to ask any other questions.
in anons world, people don't accuse each other of rape in custody battles, or try to defame a celebrity with rape allegations just because he didn't call you back the next morning...
Okay my bad, after deeper research I realise he was actually charged with Sexual Assault.
But how are you defending the difference between him finger fucking an unconscious girl and him sticking his dick in?
He's just as much of a scum bag either way.
Im not even that anon and you sound like a fucking idiot. The entire world distinguishes between "sexual assault" and "rape" for purposes of trial, and every country asks the victims about the circumstances leading up to the crime because it's part of due diligence in their legal systems and because its necessary to deduce what kind of punishment is warranted by the crime committed.
The courts care about the details of the crime. I'd say on balance, the public just care about the nature of the offence.
I am part of the "public", and there are thousands of others like me who ask for details first before shitposting about their legal systems technicalities in a newfag b8 thread.
There are people in this world who form their view of "justice" based off their legal systems definitions of the word, and those people look at "court" details to form their own opinion rather than parroting back what they heard on CNN or the BBC.
have you ever been blackout drunk? i'm going to assume not. but let me tell you, you have no idea what your saying/doing.
Also to anyone else who isn't socially awkward or straight retarded can tell you're so drunk you shouldn't be making decisions.
So when a girl says in this state "lets fuck" or however it went down i wouldn't fucking do it because its morally a fucked up act. We can get in a debate about how the victim shouldn't of allowed herself to get that intoxicated and yes that's true. but that doesn't change the fact that he took a girl who was clearly too drunk to make judgements behind a dumpster and sexually assault her.
Was anyone physically hurt?
Move on morons. Emotional damage is completely internal.
>But muh feelings
Grow up and stop listening to your irrational parts of your brain. Emotions are primitive thoughts meant to guide animals.
what if you walked in on me finger blasting your passed out sister and i just leap up and run out the door?
Good. If you have money, and access to sluts that fuck you for your car and bankroll, why are you fingering some girl that passed out next to the dumpster? He's a low class slob, and it's good this happened, as now he will never get to a position where he can rape and hide from it.
Yeah, blame Germany. It wasn't Hitlers fault whatsoever!
Using this logic, everywhere thats outside of your apartment is a "dangerous situation" that women should avoid if they don't want to get raped. The entire world is just one big rape zone, and women are just asking for it right?
Yeah, I'm sure Brock Turner is going to have fun explaining the intricacies of how he's *technically not a rapist.
Not something I'd enjoy but It's an argument made more often out of necessity I think...
>but that doesn't change the fact that he took a girl who was clearly too drunk to make judgements behind a dumpster and sexually assault her.
Which is why he was charged with a sexual assault. Because he didn't rape her by definition. So where are you trying to go with this?
It's just the MSM racebaiting and manufacturing hysteria again for the eleventh billionth time and you people keep falling for it.
Because I know exactly what's going through someone's mind while they're getting raped with a real dick or a fake one. How do you expect an answer to that. Everyone would take it differently. There isn't a textbook answer.
You know damn well there should be no difference, a sex offence is that, and it proves you are a suck faggot that shouldn't be allowed to live. They make sure you get out and tell everyone in the neighborhood you are a creep so you can't lock one of their kids in a sex dungeon.
You have to have every keystroke on the internet recorded. Your every movement accounted for, and you are never off of the list.
If you think this is unfair for people that should be killed anyway, I don't know what to tell you.
The laws seem fair to me.
>got blackout drunk: ie put self in dangerous situation
>smeared myself in meat: ie put self in dangerous situation
See how those two things aren't even remotely comparable whatsoever?
>some more than others
>but ALL for sure
Your shit analogy aside, a man has the self control it takes to NOT force someone weaker than they are to have sex with them. And its a conscious choice that human beings are sentient enough to make.
Not a primal instinct that only happens if the lions HUNGRY, barring the fact that meat can sit inside a lions cage for days without being touched because the lion can, ironically, CONTROL HIS APPETITE.