Thoughts on this? I want actual intelligent replies as it is quite thought provoking.
What is thought provoking about it? It's obviously complete tinfoil hat bullshit.
cancer is a natural phenomenon that occurs within the body of a living creature. Essentially it's a cell going rogue; abandoning it's programming and multiplying endlessly.
Unhindered by pre-programmed cell death, it produces a chemical called "Telomerase" allowing the cell to restore the Telomere cap at the end of the chromosome and thus multiply without defects.
It's only theory as to what causes cancer. Some people get it without even being exposed to known carcinogens, other people are heavily exposed to cancer-causing substances, but still don't get it.
claiming that there is a cure and that every single scientist and doctor working on a cure is just withholding it from the public so they can make the medical system more money is preposterous and far reaching. It's a claim based on nothing more than "the evil corporation is obviously just withholding the cure for cancer to make more moniez"
Is this even thought of as a secret?
Big pharma won't put much effort into research if they can sell you meds for life.
Its the glorious invisible hand of the market correcting for what's best for civilization! Now back to work drone.
Well that's true.
I'm belgian and my brother is doing his genetic phd here in Brussels.
The lab boss is a gross fat dude, who drinks is weight in beer everyday. But this dude have worked on actives substences that may have influence in cancerous cells in breast cancer context.
He actually had surprising results on test made on mouse and stuff.
The day he went to present is product to the lab CEO they just berried the project saying those won't earn enough money to product/sell.
There's a interview of this dude on internet somewhere, I'll try to find it.
Think of how many billions of people could use the vaccine and how much more fucking money they could make off that to realize how stupid that image is. David Wolfe is the real cancer.
He's half right. There already have been cures to cancer which got developed and went through testing to prove that they work, but money isn't the only thing keeping them from being publicly available.
There are hundreds of different types of cancer, with each treatment having varying degrees of success. Some are relatively easy to treat, some are a death sentence. There's no conspiracy.
>There are hundreds of different types of cancer
The types of cancer mainly refer to what organ it's found in, cancer itself is exactly the same. It's just a clump of cells growing too fast. There have been some chemicals and some metals which have been shown to slow down the cells from multiplying, like gold for example.
It just bugs the shit out of me that we've cracked most diseases, we only a few left and people seem to think thats a sign that there's a shadowy organization trying to destroy the world. I mean fuck, if there was a cure and it was suppressed then you can be sure as fuck some other lab will find it within the month.
Okay so you're apparently a 12 year old.
Here, some medical research to prove my point: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418858/
Now fuck off and go read a book about cancer before you open your dumbass mouth.
You faggots have no idea what cancer is. It is not a fucking virus or a bacteria that you can "cure." It is an unwanted mutation of cells. There is no one stop cure with today's technology.
When people talk about the retards who make up this country's voter base, there talking about you.
No, it's just that healthcare organisations are run by greedy fucks who'd rather sell you medicine on a regular basis than just cure your problem instantly. They also don't care about you dying, the world is overpopulated anyway.
Then they're going to double down profits since Fukushima is still leaking.
Okay so you're a moron. I'm not really going to argue further with you. Go read a book because it's pretty clear you don't know shit about what you're posting about, but hey it's /b/.
Even the private ones, the independent universities or the ones belonging to governments that'd kill to have the bragging rights that come with curing cancer? I understand its impossible for you to be mistaken so the only explanation is impossibly vast conspiracy where there's only one guy on earth who isn't in on it. Thats you?
>there's only one guy on earth who isn't in on it.
There are multiple people who proposed to make their cures for cancer public but got rejected or they didn't really have enough funding. It's all controlled by the greedy assholes in charge of this shit show.
LETS INJECT HEAVY METALS INTO THE BLOODSTREAM TO "CURE" THE CANCER
this is like snake oil all over again.
Cancer isn't just a "clump of cells growing too fast." It's a condition that effects us on a cellular level, and once it effects your cells it's very very hard to get rid of it because it effects the cells around it as well. This is why someone who gets cancer in their lungs may also get it in other places as well, and it's also why it's so dangerous to us.
If the cancer has spread recently it's almost impossible to detect. It could be just 1-2 cells in the liver, or the lungs, or the heart. Skin cancer is extremely common because of our exposure to the sun.
You will never "cure cancer". You will only find more efficient treatments as our understanding of the condition grows with research.
It's pretty apparent that you only have a vague understanding of cancer, probably read from Wikipedia one night before school, and now you think you're a fucking specialist.
The tobacco industry is bigger than that for cancer.
Hence, if there was a cure for cancer then the tobacco industry would ensure that it reaches the public as that would lead to their already huge market increase at least 3-4 fold.
I'd say you're a conspiratorial idiot whose weak understanding of science feeds his own pathetic fears. Cancer is not a single disease. There are more than 200 forms of cancer and have to be detected differently and treated uniquely. Stay home.
Those are generally fruit loops who think avocados ripened under full moons cure cancer. Our country developed a free hpv vaccine that's virtually eliminating cervical cancer. Where were the secret cancer police there?
>It's pretty apparent that you only have a vague understanding of cancer, probably read from Wikipedia one night before school, and now you think you're a fucking specialist.
I'm a certified radiologist with a degree, so I know what I'm talking about. Meanwhile all you really posted is a bunch of vague gibberish along the lines of "cancer is 2 compecks u dun understan". You also don't treat cancer by injecting gold into the bloodstream, which further proves how little you know. Fuck off.
Such as gold.
That is why they have treatments and never cures.
So what? Do u have the money to pay for it? No. so stop bitching. Money rules everything. Get a job. Getrich. Geneticly design cancer like they did and make a cure and never sell it to make even more money. Its the game you polish bitch.
Everyone on /b/ is a doctor specializing in cancer, braintumors and female genitalia.
This argument only really makes sense in the US where health care is privatized and thus pharmaceuticals/hospitals can charge you out the asshole.
In the rest of the work where there's no/much less money to be made, wouldn't it be in the governments interest to use the cheapest and most effective method?
its fucking truth , the cheapest solution for cancer are anticancer enzymes , vegetables and such contain them
btw did you notice that rich and important people never die on cancer ?
A fruit in qld Australia proven to cure cancer! I guarantee it wont make it past trials! wonder why....
News post this to make people believe the cure will be released.. More people give more money to large corps to fund them....
post degree with timestamp?
All you've been doing this entire thread is posting gibberish.
What you're telling me is that somehow GOLD reacts with cancerous cells and slows them down, and that, even though you are INJECTING THIS SUBSTANCE into a tumor that is connected to your circulatory system, it will not enter the bloodstream?
Again though, post picture of degree and maybe I'll take you a bit more seriously, but not really. I doubt that someone of your caliber could get a degree in radiology.
OH really? So you're saying that there are never studies found to be simply wrong? So you're saying that the average poster on /b/ has more idea about current medical problems than people who work all their lifes on the subject?
>if you don't specialize in a subject of scientific relevance and still argue about it your opinion is probably wrong
I'm not saying there is a giant conspiracy to keep cancer uncured, but it is very true that lots of money is made off of continued treatment for it. To take the same idea to a smaller scale: some of the biggest lobbyistd against marijuana legalisation are pharma groups and prison worker unions, groups that make a living off problems that would be lessened if it were legal. Consider the reduced number of painkiller prescriptions in Wash. and Co. since prohibition was repealed there.
Again, I'm not going tinfoil-hat over cancer, just stating the facts.
They're already being sold. The biggest anti-tobacco stance is "it causes cancer it's too harmful".
So if there were a cure for cancer, there's basically no huge risk to smoking anymore. You could get cancer, but you just go to the doctor and get it cured, no big deal.
Edmund Pratt spent 20 years at the helm of Pfizer, the largest pharmaceutical company in the world. Total assets worth about $170 Billion, they amass research and development from everywhere, buying up smaller companys, bribing larger ones and playing spy games to get experimentals from china. They have their filthy fingers in everything. Edmund Pratt had access to every drug known to man, every drug unknown outside of the industry and every new rumored experimental drug. If a cure to cancer existed then Edmund was the one man on Earth who could get it. Edmund died of cancer.
Because you're mentally retarded and seek validation, and now you're going to run away because you know that you aren't as smart as you think you are, and you don't want to admit it because your entire world will fall apart.
Money IS the only thing. Just last year a. Pm tobacco tried to buy a cure that they were selling but it was bought by a kemo therapy and radiation machine company out of thailand. They were backed by 3 radiation machine specialist and another pharmisutical company. Why dont we talk about that?
if the cure is eating organic diet how are they supposed to sell that dipshit
>knowing how a disease works = must be incurable
you shouldnt be here if you're under 18
that includes you op. shit's common knowledge by now
Gold nanoparticles could possibly be used to treat cancer and there are some studies on it.
One of the most common cancer drugs is cis-platin, Which is a platinum atom with 2 chlorides and 2 skins groups attached to it in a cis arrangement
Not quite. Health care is publicly funded, but not unlimited funded. They have fixed budgets that are subject to regular review. And pharmaceuticals can't advertise, or lobby hospitals/private practices to use their brand.
Do people cling to conspiracy theories because they want to feel important? Like someone cares enough to watch their every move? That their lives being shit isn't their fault, its some mysterious external figure pulling strings? When you actually look at the logistics of this shit you realize how impossible it actually is but they cling to it like gospel.
The problem is that you and I have no way to prove or disprove this. You are going on faith that what you are being told is the truth. Obviously finding some natural cure for cancer would be the worst case scenario for big pharma. Second worst case would be some rogue scientists discovering a synthesized cure, a real cure, that would ultimately mean the end of cancer research, at least in the time being. One company works make an assload of cash on it but then the well would run dry. It's just human nature to be greedy and to say that all scientific research is honorable is also in the tinfoil hat category.
worked in genetics. specifically, fred hutchison. the cure for cancer has existed since i was an intern, as far back as 2002. it was very hush-hush but it was sort of known amongst the genetics community in and around seattle back then since everyone thought deployment was "just around the corner" and waiting a few more "months" wasnt going to hurt anyone. that never happened. long story short: the cure would have cost the economy too much money and research showed that the risk of riots and shortages required production to ramp up to levels sufficient to prevent unrest (i saw the studies). think about what would happen if the USA had a cure but only enough to offer it to about a 20th of those who needed it? what would happen if someone's cherished love died before then, how desperate and angry they would be? now imagine every country outside the USA was in the same position? you get the picture. in the end it was decided that "the hard way" would be better as it would be more gradual: brute force targeted genetics i.e.: CRISPR. every patient gets their own customized cure for their particular type of cancer based on their unique genetics. it was thought this would be more gradual to allow the economy to adapt and provide other research benefits, which is all true. but rest assured there is a simple pill you can take that could cure all cancer that has been around for at least 15 years.
If cancer was curable and causable and the companies really were in it for money then why not keep treating people, curing them, and then giving them cancer again? It doesn't make any sense to just do it once.
A more "feasible" possibility is the development of treatments, vaccines, and "cures" for some cancers, but the problem being that even with NO margin for profit, these drugs/treatments will be extremely expensive, and only available to the rich.
"Oh, there's a treatment/cure for your colon cancer Mr. Jones, but it is $50,000 a month for 10 months. Ok?"
Why is this a conspiracy? This is to real for some of you i see. Grow up and learn that if u dont have money u will never get your way. The world is designed like this deal with it or go believe in the flower of life hippie shit and hug a tree. Cures are reserved for war and profit
>cure(s) for cancer
Whenever I see this, I know I'm looking at text from someone who has very little knowledge about medicine and about what cancer actually is.
Short of nanobots, I highly doubt there is any "silver bullet" cure for all types of cancer.
why is this considered a tinfoil hat thing? you'd have to be more crazy to trust that there's no cure instead of doing your own research and realizing that its a DNA-altering issue that comes from consuming DNA-altered foods..... plenty of documentaries where they feed some dying niggers all organic diet and their cancer goes away, go watch
theres no instant cure because its a problem that develops slowly over time. bad food & bad air poison slowly. "this level of ___ in ur ___ is okay because its not toxic levels" ok but just cause it doesnt kill u dont mean it does nothing. get ur heads outta the gutter
That's a gross exaggeration. There are loads of people in research making the best advances we've ever seen on curing cancers currently. Thee are not actual cures being hidden, though there may be some in the notoriously back logged FDA process, & some hidden in the enormous pile of research projects that don't get pursued.
But the ultimate $ is in the ip of a cure. As soon as one company gets it, they license it off to as many other companies as possible.
What you're referring to, is the American Cancer Society & other social organizations, which funnel money away from research and spend it on "promoting awareness". Everyone's aware cancer exists, thanks. These organizations do nothing to advance cure research and only detract from it, as well as promote a culture of treatment over cure, and are unfortunately politically powerful in medicine and even government. That's the problem.
Big pharmaceutical definitely awful and out if control, but the pursuit of a general cure is primarily in the hands of researchers and universities and the trouble comes from there being hundreds of kinds of cancers that are all different and a real bitch to figure out.
Speaking as someone who actually knows the folks in the universities studying this I can say you need a good slapping. They don't just sit in a lab waiting for a phone call from some shadowy figure giving them permission to release data. They fucking work hard and if some trenchcoated g man came in to tell them to fuck up their research they'd laugh them out the lab and it'd be all over the media in ten seconds.
Yes, no matter how dependable the source is because 'poor sheeple me' believes the majorety of people who specialize in a subject i don't know shit about for the sole reason that i know that uneducated people talk shit about other things where i'm able to point out the flaws.
If it's so easy to cure cancer then go out there to a hospital of your choice and show everyone how to cure cancer. Inject gold, or anything - sure some people are desperate enought to try. If it works just like you pretend it does you'll be famous within short time and people will not be able to make this public effectively preventing le evil companies to stop people from using it.
but what if the lab that made the breakthrough was that of a private company who spent millions on market and social research to guarantee the most possible gain for the least possible risk?
so basically every research department, the government, the FDA, and all the rich people are part of a huge conspiracy to keep the cure for cancer quiet and down, and not even a single person has ever tried to come forward.
And all of this is based on the presumption that they are doing it to make the most amount of money?
If there was actual cure for cancer, they would just sell it for more money than the meds they are selling today.
It happened with hep-C : Gilead found a cure for it. Before Sovaldi/Harvoni, people had to takes meds for their whole life, now they take 12 weeks of treatment and they are cured. This 12 weeks treatment cost 40k+€ and Gilead is making really good money thanks to this.
So your logic is that because you know a tiny fraction of researchers in the field, this applies to every single one of them? It's not a trench coated G-man, it's a "we've decided to not to continue your funding". Are you 12? Last time I checked, scientists had families to support too, so kinda doubtful they would bite the hand that feeds.
But what if I told you, there even is a machine, that cures most types of C?
And it's quite old. Early 80ties.
.... seriously? you want me to provide you with a link to proof of a secret cure for cancer? you fucking idiot. i worked in the industry and i worked in the lab that discovered, isolated and patented it. i didnt read it on some conspiracy blog, i witnessed it with my own eyes.
Its not, its a government university lab filled with young passionate people who work independently and would love to make a name for themselves. Literally thousands of those, independent, private and public.
it cures C?
Does it cure it to C++ or c#?
Don't tell me it cures C to Java...
that would be a shitty cure.
Tinfoil hat alert. There is "the other" reason.
That being, what if all of the people, regardless of age did not die from cancers. Say, over the last 50 years. Sure, there would be the other causes of death. But what would the population of the world be if there was a "cure for cancer" 50 years ago? Population control.
incorrect. you can argue against it all you want, youre making claims from the outside while i was one of the assholes helping make sure nobody found out about it or got their hands on it. thats what i get to sleep with at night.
As someone who works in Bio/Pharm research it's bullshit. There is no, nor will there ever be a 'cure for cancer', cancer is a complex of so many millions of different abberations of your own cells. They're almost impossible to kill and the best method right now (And likely ever, though refinements to current methods will likely make it less debilitating) is to hit anything growing fast really hard for the shortest period possible so the patient doesn't die. There is no other way. Every cancer is different. Take your tinfoil hat off.
No C. But the man who build it, got into big trouble.
There once were 22 of them. But they were built that way, that they can't be reversedEngineered.
Once opened never worked again. A pretty clever german guy.
And half of the 22 were placebos and didnt work at all. ;-) Pretty clever.
i was never given the patent numbers or the filings, or even the prior art. that was not my job. i knew about it from those who did that aspect of it. i worked in the lab. lab techs do not spend all year compiling a patent submission. the substance of the patent was the method for isolating components of the hormone and the method for assembling it. there is nothing on the patent that says "CURE FOR CANCER"
i get that youre used to playing games with retards so ill forgive you for that but goddamn, this is one of those times you and i were in the right place at the right time. i decided to let this out and you happened to be here. tuck this away into your little mental vault and be satisfied in the knowledge that a little more of the veil over the world was lifted for you today.
And here you are, in all your research scientist glory, raising awareness of it on /b. The bastion of informed, rational discussion amongst the worlds finest intellectuals on the planet. . Just like any well educated scientist with a degree would do.
Creating a treatment/vaccine that will not only be marketable for literally for 6 billion people, but for their kids and their kids for the rest of all time. Yeah, not a fucking cent there.
Here's the 'answer' to your question OP: Paranoia.
A lot of Americans in particular are getting more and more paranoid because their country is run by wealthy people, and that's true. It is in some ways. However, countries with free healthcare use the same treatments as America with the same results, and are still doing better. If you honestly believed that a cure for cancer wasn't being withheld from the public by some greedy, powerful men, you're delusional and ignorant about the rest of the world, and how it works. The greedy bastards wouldn't be doing themselves a favor by keeping a cure for cancer a secret.
Here's a shortcut to facing reality: look up how many people die of cancer each year, and figure out how much they could be earning a country throughout their life instead of either being in treatment or dying young.
You're trying too hard to blame 'them'.
This is delusional. A thought like this is brought out of the idea that humans are all powerful and can fix anything, and that there must be some conspiracy allowing such a dangerous illness to exist. A thought like this is bred out of our extreme fear and denial about death.
If a cure to cancer existed, the fame alone would be reason enough for it to be shared with the world.
Companies and governments suck at keeping secrets, and most liars become exposed eventually.
Cancer is hard to cure because it is our own body behaving abnormally. So anything designed to kill it will most likely kill all our normal cells too. And most people get cancer, but our bodies kill off those abnormal cells. The scary question is why doesn't it sometimes?
My aunt work for a cancer research lab, she also had cancer, she was able to cure herself rather quickly using what they came up with. She was murdered along with her other research partners and is deemed a random act of violence. Their lab was shut down and everythibg taken away and burned. This happenedseverytime someone makes a claim for a cure.
Absolutely retarded logic
Anyone agreeing with this is an utter idiot
People buy cigs because they want to smoke
People don't buy cigs because they don't want to smoke
No one cares about getting cancer
go ahead and pat yourself on the back. yeah this place is mostly neckbeards but there are more normies who browse 4chan than you realize. ive lurked here for so long, ive seen so many of these threads... but this is no joke. its not a conspiracy, its as simple as filing a patent and not writing "THIS IS A CURE FOR CANCER" all over it. basic human biology is patented every year by phrama, you think this is somehow impossible for them to pull off? all you have to do is patent a chemical. so long as you dont say "hey guys this little chemical when administered like this totally cures all cancer...."
Yea, reddit is retarded.
Now fuck off back where you came from.
Fuck off shills.
my aseptic technique will rek u sun
only because there are still wild cases of polio. Granted there is only 1 country left where polio hasn't been eliminated but once it has and polio has been declared eradicated then they'll stop using the polio vaccine. The same thing happened with smallpox and rinderpest
Cancer will always be there because it is not a virus. It will pop up and need treatment or there will be a vaccine to prevent it that you'd need to take every ten years with your dumbass kids.
There was one guy in germany who caught this disease besides beeing on the news quiet frequently.
It was a butcher who drank a soup of boiled cow brains (the most infected part of the cow) for three meals a day. If there was ever someone trying to get it, it was him. It's really not as horrible as the news make it sound...
I'm not questioning the plausibility of it happening. I'm questioning why you seem to think this is a fucking marvelous place to enlighten the world.
"I read it on 4chan.' doesn't exactly exude "holy shit, it must be true then" does it?
So give us all a break and stop pretending you was in with the people who supposedly tried to patent a cure. You're coming off as a lonely, delusional attention whore.
Try bringing this up on multiple newspaper forums in many different countries and see if it takes a foothold. ITMT, your weak tales about it being patented are already being ripped to shreds even on this board.
Good luck, attention seeker.
Who is reaping these perceived rewards of cancer treatment vs cancer curing? The medical industry. OK, well who is paying all of that money out? Insurance companies.
Insurance companies are NOT making money off of cancer treatment, they are paying for it out the ass. Don't tell me they'd rather pay $190,000 in chemo and treatment versus a $5000 in a series of injections. The amount of money THEY PAY OUT for treatment is equal to the amount of money that you tinfoils think is a $200B a year "industry".
Have you ever tried keeping a secret from your health insurance? Yeah, there's no cure for cancer.
Cancer can be cured through diet. It's the only proper natural way to get rid of the cancer and keep it away, instead of it coming back some years down the line.
Do not follow these quack therapies such as Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy. They do not get to the root cause. The Doctors even allow cancer patients to keep eating awful foods and smoke cigarettes. The Doctors don't have a clue on true health.
I always remember growing up a child and my parents saying things like, "He's a Doctor. He's a very intelligent man.". I've now come to realise that it's a load of bullshit.
>Thoughts on this? I want actual intelligent replies as it is quite thought provoking.
Former Medical Physicist and Radiation Oncologist here (lost my job because I turned into a pillhead alcoholic)....I spent years in cancer research and there is no big conspiracy. The problem is that every cancer is different (even those of the exact same type in a different person)
>medicine companies want to make a profit, therefore the cure for cancer is made secret
That tin foil hat theory is based on the premise that the whole World's medical market in every nation is:
1) controlled by a "USA-model" of capitalism and pharmaceutical companies don't have to answer to local governments anywhere
2) cancer research is exclusively done by said pharmaceutical companies, and never by public/national research
Otherwise that "let's make it secret so we can make money"-thing wouldn't really work.
Some institution independent of pharmaceutical companies would have found one of those "cures" most likely by now, and even if they hadn't, the laissez faire way in which companies can control the prices of medication in the USA doesn't work in most other nations.
Many western nations (and several nations that aren't "western", too) have a more comprehensive public healthcare system than the USA, meaning that the profits from medications wouldn't come from "helpless" consumers, but from governments who can regulate or even enforce bans on companies with "highway robbery"prices on their medications. "You want to rip off our government's public healthcare resources? Fuck you, we're banning your drug ENTIRELY from our nation, so you won't get a fucking dime from here until you make the price sensible!"
Furthermore, MOST of the people in the world are so poor that they can't be "ripped off" by extravagant medication prices. They simply won't be able to purchase them.
Cancers are an inherent part of human physiology, not an infectious disease you fucking spastic. Even if there was a vaccine, it would have to be continually administered to every successive generation.
Jesus fucking christ the people that buy into this shit are painfully retarded.
>die alone in tinfoil lined cabins mummified by tumors and loneliness
Never heard of the epipen?
There was a doctor that went on the Johnny Carson show that completely exposed aids as a government released virus. He died 28 days later of a heart attack
Zika had been fully contained for over 80 years and has somehow been released back into the public.
There's a little more than tinhat shit going on here
Sure, as long as you're ok with every single person in this conspiracy being bad at maths and business. All it takes is one independent researcher to publish their findings and you go from $200b to $0 instead of $200b to some value for selling the cure.
No you dumbass. Several cancers are highly correlated with certain viruses. They are by no means ONLY caused by these viruses.
Even then, there are literally thousands of different types of cancers. The vast, vast majority (maybe all) have no singular cause. There is no such thing as a "vaccine" for all cancers and there likely never will be.
actually there is a cure for autism but the illuminati is keeping that a secret too for obvious reasons it's a brazillion dollar a year indistry and i have it on excellent authority that all of the cures to all ailments and diseases are kept in a secret underground bunker right where they faked the moon landing which is on the underside of the flat earth. you dint hear it from me though, good luck 2u gmen im behind 7 proxy with spoofed mac on a free mcdonalds wifi liking my cheeseburger
I'm not sure I see how that relates to whether or not there's a secret cancer cure being held back by illuminati/lizardmen/big pharma/whatever other group supposedly has their shit together so well that they can actually keep things secret for decades when literally nobody else has ever managed that.
same with aids etc they don't want a cure
they are not looking for a cure their only looking for better treatments. WAy to much money to be made, unless they can sell the cure for millions per dose #itsnotgoingtohappen
My initial comment was replying to someone suggesting that vaccines will eventually stop making money. He then replied to my comment, so I assumed it was the same person.
I'm not the idiot because you can't follow a basic conversation chain.
id gief you's the link but it on deeperweb custom nodes. found it on flashdrive on a rothschilds dumpster dive. it blow ur mind, need to go into hibernation after reading. a real whopper
it's still retarded to believe in things that are objectively speaking wrong
Well, hey guise, at least if it is true we can trust one of these fine, honest individuals. Cuz they care about us.
As someone who is a pharmaceutical researcher, the amount of money it costs to develop a drug, before trials begin and then the amount of money the companies would have to pay to researchers/lab technicians/associated research staff and so on just to keep them quiet.... no, such cures have not been developed. Think of then money a company could make selling a cure for even a relatively obscure for of cancer. There is no cure all for cancer anyway, there are different types of cancers and each type would require a different cure.
wow, when I was in hs I used to pose with road kill and stuff to be edgy, but im a neckbeard spergking, them bitches are fucked in the head and I bet they would all partake in ass2mouth
Ah, so by "sell to the rich", you mean "sell to the people who are the most likely to own the companies making the cure in the first place". I don't think you know what selling is.
of course you fucking idiot, but he was referencing the fact that smoking would appeal to a larger market if it didn't have negative connotations. Also, how many people do you know that have quit smoking/ discouraged others from doing it because of cancer? obviously without consequences smoking would be way more attractive.
Go shove a broken glass bottle up into
your colon anon.
Exactly. Thats why a secret would never exsist. They would fund an unaccounted project for the indiviual involved. Cure and dispose of the product. Is it so crazy to believe these people to use there means to make a cure ( for the short term)
>Hollywood assholes leak for lulz sake
>offshore scandals are discovered by bypassing journalists
>sceintists cannot dump cure for cancer into the internet because of muh establishment
steel memes can't melt cancer beams, gub'munt against us all, lerminati! line your hat with tin foil and don't brush your teefus's cause ah flooride! '
WAKE UP SHEEPLE. I AM FUCKING NEO FROM THE MATRIX AND EVERYONE IS STUPID BUT ME WHY DOES NOBODY GET IT?!
If there was a cure that was somehow "blocked" then pharma companies wouldn't still be dumping billions of dollars into research and development for it. They'd have given up knowing that if they found something that it would be blocked also. Proof that if they are still searching for it - it hasn't been found yet.
Cancer is such a broad range of ailments, saying there's "cures for cancer" is practically meaningless. Differnt treatments are effective for different cancers, just like different anti biotics are better for other infections.
Researchers and billionairs still die of cancer, or lose friends and families. I medicine profitable? Yeah, it can be. But hell, if one pharmaceutical company unlocked a cure for all of them they'd knock out the market and leave the others in their dust.
This line of thinking is common amongst anti-vax lunatics.
>there are multiple cures for cancer
Well, yes. Doesn't mean they're being suppressed - hell, there are lots of people who get cured of cancer these days. There just isn't any magic bullet that will cure any cancer, because it's not a single disease. Each type of tissue has different kinds of cancer that can afflict it and even within the types there's a lot of variation that comes down to your own genome and which specific mutations are causing it.
Anon with a brain tumor. I don't know if you're telling the truth but you're trying to make life easier for people like myself if you are. Even if nothing gets done in my lifetime it's just nice to know people are putting in the effort
>Thoughts on this?
Do dich people die from cancer? Steve Jobs did.
So no, there is no cure for cancer and there is no conspiracy.
>cancer itself is exactly the same
It's not, though. Even within the same tissue there are often multiple different kinds of cancer, and even within those kinds there may be different mutations at work.