Solve this
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Solve this
9
>>702822946
1
rolling for luck
I say 1
>>702823103
that's because you didn't pay attention in math class
>>702823090
>>702823024
>>702822947
little einsteins out there
>>702822857
Faggot op
a
g
g
o
o
He answer is 9
>>702822857
use bodmas, answers 9
>>702823222
The
>>702822982
7
DMAS
it's 9 u fucking retards, honestly why is b so fucking dumb
>>702822857
9/11
1+2=3
6/2*(3)=1
6
>>702822857
1+2 is 3, 3x3=9 order of ops, OP fucking retards.
>>702822857
Fuck off with this b8 m8. We've had this discussion many times.
It's 9
1.
Thanks PEMDAS!
>>702823297
you needed help with this?
>>702823359
I love this DMAS it always filters out the retards good job anon you are a smart
>>702823364
wow nearly cut my finger open on the edginess of that post, fuck off newfag
>>702823430
This is where everyone fucks up. The 3 doesn't go in paranthesis. You simplified it as much as you can, so it turns into
> 6/2*3
And not
> 6/2(3)
4
it's funny, got into the same ?? when reviewing my algebra book from high school. what's easy to miss when executing PEMDAS is that you do the "multiplication and division" step from left to right, not multiplication left to right then division left to right.
>>702823939
It's the same
>6/2*3
>3*3
>9
>>702823508
If you used it correctly you'd get 9 retard.
Orders of operation don't really help because different acronyms are taught. BODMAS and PEMDAS are both valid but have multiplication and division in a different order.
If multiplication takes precedence then the answer is 1. If division takes precedence then the answer is 9.
I think that the answer is 1 because the multiplication is implicit. You would always do implicit division (i.e. fractions) first so I think it should be the same for multiplication.
>>702823297
What program or page is this ?
>>702824195
No because people leave the three in paranthesis after it should be eliminated, people give it special treatment like so
>6/2(3)
>6/6=1
this shows how fucking retarded most of you actually are ... golden
THE REASON WHY ITS 9 AND WHY YOU ARE
FUCCCKKKKINNNNGGG UP
IS M/D IS LEFT TO RIGHT.
ITS WHATEVER IS FIRST..
SO
ITS 6/2 * 3
3*3 = 9
GET IT RIGHT FAGGOT.
its still and always nine ... all you nigger faggots should have gone to school instead of getting your asses fucked
>>702824356
Neither takes precidence in either acronym, people are just stupid. They are on equal footing, just as addition and subtraction are. You go from left to right once all paranthesis, brackets, and exponents have been simplified.
You people are retarded. PEMDAS: Parentheses, Exponent, Multiplication, Division, Addition, Subtraction.
>6÷2(1+2)=?
>6÷2(3)=?
Do parentheses first
>6÷6=?
Next is Multiplication cuz there's no exponent
>6÷6=1
Next is division which leaves you with one
You people need to go back to high school math class you autists.
>>702823297
HOLY SHIT SOMEONE TELL ME WHAT IS THIS
>>702823359
The left to right aspect of pedmas vs the propensity to multiply by two before dividing because the appearance of that part "touching". Really, OP is the faggot here, because he presented us an equation that has more than one interpretation. There should be an extra set of parentheses (6÷2)(1+2) then there is no doubt in the order of operations. Mathematics at this level should not have ambiguity. The ruse created by OP here is like the scene in Wayne's World 2 where he orders from the drive through of stan Mikita's, but OP is all butthurt when some of us fell for his faggotry
>>702823771
>9/11
>edgy?
First day here? You might be happier at Reddit where you can downvote posts and feel you accomplished something.
>>702822857
God fucking dammit you piece of low life scum nigger faggot retard hownmaby times do you have to post this stupid fucking question?
THE ANSWER IS ONE
DO NO POST THIS AGAIN GO TO SCHOOL LEARN ELEMENTARY MATH YOU STUPID FAG
>>702824492
>People give it special treatment
Just because they are stupid and need special treatment. It doesn't make them right.
They are the same, and here is the full version of it.
>6/2(3)
>(6*3)/2 by using the rule a/b*m=am/b
>18/2
>9
Just because people don't know basic arithmetic doesn't mean we should in anyway change things to accomodate their stupidity.
>>702824755
That is the wrong PEMDAS mate. It's setup like this
Parentheses then exponents and roots then multiplication and division then addition and subtraction.
If more of the same level appear you go from left to right.
You just got beaten by an autist. What about you learn your math.
lol so many retarded fucks here that dont know simple math
DISTRIBUTE THE 2 YOU AUTISTS
>>702824744
It's all trivial anyway, in any serious mathematics or physics division is always represented as a fraction which removes any ambiguity.
>>702824851
9/11 joke for the sake of it is fucking try hard that shit has reddit all over it
>>702824755
But 'doing the parenthesis first' only applies to (1+2). Brush up on basic math before calling other anons out.
If you autistically try to follow pemdas rules (or whatever variant you learnt in high school) you get 9.
But in most maths I've encountered since then the ÷ sign is rarely used and this problem is a probably a differently (read: badly) phrased version of
___6___ = 1
2(1+2)
>>702824755
M/D IT DOESNT MATTER WHAT ORDER JUST WHAT COMES FIRST YOU IDIOT. YOUR MESSING UP THE RULE FUCKTARD.
M/D IS LEFT TO RIGHT //// DIVISION COMES FIRST.
>>702824392
>>702824759
Wolfram Alpha
>>702824990
fucking retard
9 and anybody that disagrees is a heretic.
1
>>702824990
It's been posted several times, yes. And yet you still haven't managed to get the answer correct.
>>702825169
No.
a(b) means a X b
So this comes out as 6/(2X2)
>>702825050
Distribute means multiply through. In this case, the multiplication has to be done after the division. Order of operations.
>>702822946
/thread
>>702823588
no i just hav such a low self esteem that i hav no confidence in any answer. also im retarded... c wat i did there bish?
>>702825283
This pemdas bs is so fucking retarded
>>702825464
No it doesn't. It literally says 6/2*3
that program is wolfram alpha
>>702825464
Do you even math?
>>702825464
Yes, a(b) means aXb, as in multiplication. So it gets done after the division, left to right.
>>702825648
That would have been if it was (6/2)(1+2)
See op question its different.There are no brackets separating these two operations so the answer is 1
>>702822857
1 since 2 (1+2) is calculated first, giving you 6 which after that gives you 1 when 6 is divided with 6
>>702825002
Oh no I'm not excusing them for doing it, I've just noticed that every time this thread is made that is the major mistake. They simplify the paranthesis first as expected, but for some reason don't eliminate the paranthesis which is the fucking point if simplifying it first. They're retarded, no doubt about it.
>>702825785
Sorry i meant (2X3)
>>702825339
PEMDAS sir! I'm sorry they didn't teach you that at your school full of mouth breathing morons, but it's what you do first. Yes, you can do it left to right bit with certain problems but this isn't such problem.
>>702825855
>There are no brackets, exactly. First you solve the right bracket, then you go left to right. That hard to understand?
>6/2(1+2)
>6/2*3
>3*3
>9
Seriously...
>>702825855
>>702825464
>>702825283
I think this answers our question
>>702825918
/thread
>>702825993
Of course it's such a problem. It applies to every problem.
>>702826210
Shoot yourself anon
>>702826108
>6/2*3
Ok
But you have to understand that its 6/(2*3) not (6/2)*3
I'm sorry man this much should be understandable.
>>702826198
i think you need basic math
Check em(anwser)
>>702826353
just kill yourself please
>>702826353
It isn't. If you want that you are looking for this expression
>6/(2(1+2)
Which then continues like this.
>6/(2*3)
>6/6
>1
If you look at it and follow the rule a/b*m=am/b it ends up looking like this
>6/2(1+2)
>(6(1+2))/2
>>702822857
>filename
Kek, swedefag?
>>702826859
PS: In this case a=6, b=2 and m=(1+2)
>>702826353
>>702826353
No it isn't. The only time you distribute through paranthesis like that is when there's a variable in the paranthesis. If no variable, you solve the equation in the paranthesis, and eliminate it, which leaves you with:
6/2*3
3*3
9
>>702826859
>6/(2+(1+2))
That is unnecessary anon.The 2(1+2) already means it should be solved first.
(2(1+2)) is the same thing in this context
/thread?
>>702822857
I hope people saying 1 is trolling. This is BASIC math. I'm losing faith in humanity.
>>702827041
Not really true. The rules don't change just because a variable is present.
>>702827150
You are pretty dense. Here we go
The equation 6/2(2+1)=6/2*(2+1). In the first the multiplication is implicit, in the other it is directly noted. Just different notation. With me so far?
The notation 6/2(2+1) simply means you multiply the whole fraction (in this case 6/2) with the factor (in this case 2+1).
It follows the simple rule a/b*m=am/b. When you are using variables you can also have implicit multiplication, but that means they are part of the same segment.
And I know some people use the ":" or "/" as implicit notation for "everything after this is the divisor" or some shit. We simply follow the rules and don't use it as implicit notation to be precise. The only time where we use it is with multiplication because it shouldn't confuse anyone... yet here we are...
>>702828029
>a/b*m = am/b
Agreed
But here the case is
>a/b(m)
Which is a/(b*m)
Or a/(bm) whatever notation u prefer
Also I tried using a calc
>>702827439
Anyone who passed the 7th grade should fucking know this by now.
>6/2= 3
>(1+2)=3
>3 X 3=9
If you say 1 youre actually autistic
6/2*(1+2)
6/2*3
3*3=9
Harambe
>>702828506
>Not realising a/b(m)=a/b*m since the parenthesis is redundant
Even Wolfram knows basic notation
enough now !
>>702828992
>a/b(m) is a/b*m
Wrong
a/b*m is (a/b) * m because pemdas
Whereas a/b(m) is a/(b*m) because brackets solved first
basically you faggots are saying 3(3) is fucking 1. THREE TIMES FUCKING THREE. did you fail math class? or are you fucking around? either way, 3(3) is fucking 9, you dumb shits.
>>702822857
thats 9 nigger.
The answer is 9.
The fact that some people get it wrong is not so bad.
The fact that they persist it's not, when they have the power of the fucking internet to verify it, is that bad.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=6%C3%B72(2%2B1)
>>702822857
nein
>>702829438
Seriously...
>a/b(m)
>a/b*(m)
>a/b*m
How fucking dense are you? Remember the multiplication is implicit...
>>702829689
Literally the first link says that google considers brackets a bit differently
https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/websearch/kZkTv_WTSxA
>>702824851
This guy apparently takes "edgy" to mean "genuinely shocking".
It's edgy because it's meant to be shocking but comes off more autismo.
>>702829977
>a/b*(m)
Do you even know what the parenthesis are used for?
It literally means multiplication but given first preference while solving.Seriously consider taking elementary math again.
>pemdas
>bodmas
>fuckmas
>mfw americans are so stupid they need to invent words for calculation order
its not fucking rocket science, lard balls
>>702830272
>You start by solving what's in a parenthesis
>(m)=m
Top kek m8.
>>702823222
Wasted bait and trips
>>702830444
>(m)=m
What?
>>702823297
How can you be so deceived
>>702830666
I solved what is in the parenthesis, therefor I can remove it. Simple.
You are too dense to understand simple arithmetic.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPe1aBW_YCg
>>702830907
Ok what's your answer to this?
(6/2)/(1+2)
>>702822857
Hmm lets see... Well first we start with the parentheses...pic related
>>702831262
Then we solve for the denominator...
>>702831373
Then we subtract one twin tower.
>>702831529
And then we get our answer!
>>702831725
Kek
>>702831129
>(6/2)/(1+2)
>3/(1+2)
>3/3
>1
>>702823297
P E M D A S
E
M
D
A
S
>>702831129
If you want it another way
>(6/2)/(1+2)
>6/(2(1+2))
>6/(2*3)
>6/6
>1
And to note 6/2(1+2) is not enough. Try wolfram again that uses normal computation.
>>702831262
I need to talk with your parents, Billy.
>>702832001
>>702832240
Ok last question
What's your answer to this
(6÷2)(1+2)
>>702832416
>(6/2)(1+2)
>3*3
>9
I see what your gameplan is, but you forget to realise that 6/2(1+2)=/=6/(2(1+2))
>>702832256
Please don't. I promise I'll stop drawing dicks.
The answer is 9.
PEMDAS is *sort of* correct, but it doesn't explain that multiplication and division hold equal priority when solving and so you do whichever one comes first when read from left to right, NOT multiplication and then division.
>>702832728
Ok but is (6/2)(1+2) = 6/2(1+2)?
Its not
6/2(1+2) is
6
----------------------------
2(1+2)
>>702833066
No it isn't.
>(6/2)(1+2)=6/2(1+2)
I divide with (1+2) to reduce the equation
>((6/2)(1+2))/(1+2)=(6/2(1+2))/(1+2)
This gives
>6/2=6/2
And it works the same way with 6/2*(1+2) because the multiplication sign is implicit.
>>702833650
How can you assume 6/2 as (6/2)?
You can't just put parenthesis wherever you like.
6/2(1+2) brackets first
6/2(3) then multiple or divide, in the order they appear [division]
3(3) then multiply
3x3=9
>>702831529
>>702834239
>>702834274
>>702834043
right
>>702833066
no. you go in order. firs you take the 6/2 = 3 then you take the three and multiply by whats in the parentheses. (1+2)=3 so you have 3(3) which = 9. moron
>>702834302
>>702834346
>>702834043
I don't.
Look at what I said in the end
>the multiplication sign is implicit
Which means
>6/2(1+2)=6/2*(1+2)
>(6(1+2))/2
>(6+12)/2
>18/2
>9
They are the same...
>>702834346
>>702834413
fuck.. missed one..
>>702822857
Lator dont lie
>>702822857
And also the other way is still 9
>>702834464
Your second step
>(6(1+2))/2 would have been if the question was
>6/2/(1+2)
Which is actually 6÷2/(1+2) which is
(6*(1+2))/2
Did you see my calc post?
How can calculator be wrong bro?
As for the google answer which is gives 9 see this
https://productforums.google.com/forum/m/#!topic/websearch/kZkTv_WTSxA
>>702834969
>a/b*m=am/b
>a/b/m=a/(bm)
Try again
>>702835519
>a/b/m=a/(bm)
Oh for fucks sake u can't be serious.
>>702835847
Here is all the division rules
>a/b*m=am/b given b=/=0
>(a/b)/m=a/bm given b=/=0 and m=/=0
>m/(a/b)=m*b/a=bm/a given b=/=0 and a=/=0
To note, this is using fractions. (a/b)/m=a/b/m
>(a/b)(c/d)=ac/bd given b=/=0 and d=/=0
>(a/c)/(c/d)=a/b*d/c given c=/=0, d=/=0 and b=/=0
>a/b=ac/bc given b=/=0 and c=/=0
(a/b)+(c/d)=ad/bd+cb/db=(ad+cb)/bd given b=/=0 and d=/=0
And to note, (a/b)+(c/d)=a/b+c/d
>>702835847
I'll leave you now. These rigorous rules are used to teach and have been seen by many people. No problem has been found by them at all. They are rigorous.
I need my sleep. See ya
>>702822857
1. BODMAS.
>>702837421
Ah I need sleep to.I guess we part ways in disagreement
9
>>702824799
It's not ambiguous; you're just an idiot.
>>702822857
6:2=3 (1+2=3) answer = 33
Can't tell if all the retards in this thread saying it's 9 are just b8 or legitimately retarded. If we rewrite the equation with the 6 in the numerator position and the rest of the equation in the denominator, will you still agree the answer is 9? Pic related: it's what you are all doing to me right now.
