Hi /b/
Wich graphic crard are you using and wich new games can you run in 60 fps
GTX 1070, all of them?
Amd Radeon Sapphire R9 290x
Mainly got it for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided and the new Doom, can play very high settings at 60fps on both
gtx 750ti
gta V in medium
>>702663697
GTX 970, battlefied 1
>>702663697
970x darksouls 3
I own a Dell vostro 250 desktop and I can run world of Warcraft at 75 fps on average if I turn the settings all the way down and put the render scale to 50%
is the 1070 worth?
>>702664628
Somebody buy me a new computer
>>702664628
you remind me of this guy
730gt 2gb.
Pretty much like not having a graphics card.
>>702663783
Same
>>702663697
>wich
980 Ti. I can run Tetris at max, speedy and crisp. like, a billion FPS.
>>702663944
i have 2 290x's, life is good.
>>702664859
can you run minecraft ????
NVidia 770, all of them, some at 144.
>>702663697
gtx 980 can run any VR game at 90 fps
>>702664859
what about runescape?
What ever is in my xboxone and none only 30fps for me :(
gtx 970 and i can run pretty much any game at 60+
>>702663697
Gtx Titan
Every game ever
>>702664943
maybe, but i haven't tried. i don't want to overclock.
960 bottlenecked by a Celeron G1620,games none
>>702664742
Where tf did you get this pic of me in college
>>702665067
i haven't tried. my dial-up is too slow.
Mac fag here, Macbook Pro with AMD Radeon R9 M370X 2 GB and Intel Iris Pro 1,5 GB
Verdun
>>702664931
2 of them? nice man, you running multiple monitors?
GTX970
No Man's Sky at 75 in high.
beat that.
980ti sc+ acx2.0+ I can run pretty much everything at 1080p max settings and get 60 fps.
The problem is that 60 fps is for plebs, and I need to run my games at 144hz these days to not feel sickened at the low framerate. I can run most games at 144fps 1080p with some settings lowered so it's all good.
>>702665234
>>702663697
2x gtx1080 watercooled
Battlefield 1 200fps
>>702665239
nah just 1 1080p tv.
>>702665506
only ?
>>702665047
Not project cars
>>702663697
1080
So I can play cs go at higher then 200 fps
>>702663783
Same same
>>702665506
fuck you
>>702665286
>No mans meme
youre the only one losing here
>>702664204
Same
Gtx 1080 FTW
Witcher 3 1440p Ultra 60fps
CS:S Low 14 fps
>>702665121
>Ever
>>702663697
gtx 970
Can run most games fine and on max settings half the time
>>702664699
if the 1080 is alittle outta your price range then this is the next best thing, Radeon RX480 has absolutely nothing on this. a stock 1070 beats a overclocked 480
>>702665527
honestly the only game i cant seem to play flawlessly even on low settings is Metro: Last Light, im convinced that game was just very crappily optimized for amd or something
GeForce 2xy something.
Runs Quake 3 with 125 fps.
>>702665121
should of gone with the 1080 :/
>>702666810
you must be running something shitty to only get 60fps on witcher 3, motherboard or cpu? have you over clocked your 1080?
>>702663697
>60 fps
>>702667925
1080p gaming is still the most used out of anything so pipe down.
1070 everything ULTRA 1080p 60fps easy.. hell it even runs ARK at 60fps ULTRA hahaahaha
GTX 560 Ti, Unreal Tournament at 1280x1024 with epic settings
2x GTX980
I guess I can run everything
>>702668673
umm no, no it cant.
>>702670311
except for the games which dont support SLI but yeah.
>>702663697
>Intel HD Graphics 5000 1536 MB
>Erm, Day Of The Tentacle?
>>702670353
this
ARK is a fucking cock sucking piece of shit in terms of performance.
>>702663697
GeForce FX5200. Can run CoD 2 in directx9, absolutely rocks quake 3 and serious sam. I can run Half Life 2 pretty well, and cs 1.6 never drops below 35fps.
>>702663697
Running 2 970's in sli cause autisms. Everything 90-144fps on max at 1080p
>>702670487
almost all new games support SLI, so it's good for me
>people still running 1080p
lol
Spending half a grand on a video card and $100 on a shitty monitor is about as logical as building a "gaming" PC with a 6800K and a Radeon 460.
>>702671176
Nothing wrong with my 1080p 144hz g-sync monitor that a $650 gpu can't handle :)
>>702671176
depends what you want. 1080 does me just fine as long as its 144fps
>>702663697
R9 280x
>GtaV, DOOM, Etc etc etc on Ultra a 1080p
>Select few at Ultra 1440p like Evolve
>>702671077
I have quite a few games that the second card doesn't use. 1 card is better if you're spending all in one go. If it makes sense to spend half as much now and a second card later, sli/xfire makes more sense
>>702671422
>GTA V Ultra 1080p
>Can compete with multisampling
>>702671176
Lol I spent $250 on my graphics card and $80 on my monitor and I can still play everything on ultra and it looks beautiful
>>702671581
You mean msaa? I have mine set to 4x
>60fps
Please. Theres literally no reason to not have a 144hz g-sync monitor and aim to run at 85fps minimum, 144hz being the goal.
>>702671077
thats complete false but sure, okay. almost meaning nearly all and id says thats no where near true, why i say to people to get one powerful card over 2 semi good ones.
>>702665678
yes, Battelfield 1 is limited to 200fps
Should I get an ASUS VG248QE?
I have something called Geeforce. Heroes of might and magic 3 is working pretty good.
>>702663697
gtx 1060
The other question is stupid, you can run any game at 60 fps even with a low end card, all it takes is to put all on low.
>>702663697
>wich
>>702670760
Jokes aside, an fx5200 should be running 1.6 at 100fps
I'm running CS:GO with a GTX 1070 and an i7 6700k on 450 fps average
Radeon HD 5450
Radeon HD 5450
>>702663697
Mine is a Titan Black.
>>702672731
Never understood why people even care about cs:go benchmarks, that game is just a glorified gmod and runs like cheesecake on anything
>>702667276
Disable phys-x, and your problem will be long gone
>>702672074
perhaps
>>702670760
Have no problem maxing shit out at 1080p
>>702663697
iGPU from 6600k. Haven't bought a card yet, looking for 1070s.
I can run Oblivion on high with +60fps... fuck.
GTX 1080.
Runs modded Fallout 4 in VR with no problems.
>>702673234
>>702671990
still, if game doesn't support SLI, i just can disable one card, and play on one 980. I'm don't going to buy "one powerful" card, cuz imo 980 is still pretty powerful, maybe next year I will buy 1080
>>702663783
Im looking to invest in a 1070, they worth the price?
gtx 960, not too many games, but upgrading to 1070 soon
>>702663697
Gtx 770, Watch Dogs set on ultra textures.
>>702673503
Step up to 1440p or higher refresh rate, you're wasting the potential for all that money you spent
>>702663697
60 fps
>who runs that low anymore ?
>>702663697
nvidia 2
minesweeper low settings
MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X OC
Running games like TW3 and GTAV maxed out 60fps 1080p.
60hz monitor. Best price/performance card for 1080p.
Running 2x 980's in SLI, can run Deus Ex: MD at 60+ FPS on very high. Gonna wait till 1080 Ti's before I upgrade, maybe even later
>>702663697
760
Any, at low settings
>>702673821
I wanted to get >>702672074 this screen, do you think it's worth it?
>>702674024
It's a pretty good monitor. It's a TN panel so you won't get the best colors or contrast ratio or viewing angles, but other than that it's fine for gaming if that's your main purpose
>>702673907
nice
Anyone running a 144 Hz monitor? I could use some recommendations for an upgrade
GTX 960 4GB VRAM. Bottlenecked by my shitty Phenom II X4 Black Edition. Can still play Mortal Kombat X, GTA V, and Resident Evil Remake on High to Ultra with very minor stuttering. Can't complain, I suppose.
>>702673234
>970
>at 1600Mhz
>>702663697
GTX 960 it runs The Witcher 3 on ultra with hair works and all. Feels really smooth.
>>702663697
I run two 970s in SLI. I run everything quite well but it just uses fuck tons of power and makes my thighs pretty warm.
>>702673647
100% worth it, love my asus strix 1070
>>702665506
> not propane cooled OC
Get on my level.
>>702674767
>Gaming
>On a laptop
ISHYGDDT
>>702663697
Got a HD3000 on a dual core macbook 2011. Use it mainly for Photoshop. Tried to edit a 2 min. clip in After effects. Rendering took just a bit over 2 and a half hours... Feels bad man...
>>702674656
Memory is at 8000mhz as well
>>702674722
Lol, liar.
>>702674944
Getting it to display in GPU-Z long enough for a screen shot doesn't make it stable.
8800GT gonna be replacing it with 1070 soon finally
>>702675209
Holy shit that's an unbalanced system.
>>702674832
I look forward to getting it.
powercolor r9 390, can run any game ultra basically
980ti, everything.
>>702674914
AE is a pain in the ass. Had to get a trash can because video editing with vfx is getting ridiculous in terms of processing power required.
>>702665100
970 isn't that great of a buy at this time given Nvidia's habit of gimping previous generation cards to prop up the newest cards.
If you pick one up cheap, sure, but I would rather pick up a 1060 or a RX 480 as they are both in similar price ranges.
>>702675202
Well I'm not going to make a webm of it being validated in Firestrike to appease you. But I can tell you it's my daily driver setting for most everything
>>702675088
What the fuck did you just say about me you little bitch?
Jokes aside, I am not shitting you. It works flawlessly. Could be just my i5 4600 makes it work like that. Also, I play on a 1920x1080 screen, but I have a 1280x1024 monitor connected to the graphics card at all times.
>>702675508
I'll translate
>Well, you called me out on my bullshit, and I'm not going to provide you with any proof of my claims
>>702663697
had to decide between 980 gtx and 1060.
Picked the 1060 because of Future Pascal Technologie
>>702675293
Right now ? yes. Well you see i dont really have money so Ive been replacing like 1 component every month or so
>>702663697
HD 6970
Not many, as my GPU runs at 60 celsius on IDLE ffs
>>702663697
>>702675659
Why not look into a 1060 if you're strapped for cash? They're pretty solid.
980ti and runs everything at max in 60fps
Prob could go higher, but monitors max refresh is 70
>>702675715
Replace the thermal compound and make sure one of the fans didn't die.
>>702675622
Check the core clock m8
http://www.3dmark.com/fs/8674978
>>702675816
I replaced the thermal compound only 6 months ago with some Arctic Silver 5. It's a reference XFX design, so only has one fan: blower style.
>>702675985
Was it running hot before you did it, or is there a chance you didn't get it back together correctly?
>>702675744
The thing is my gf has bought me the cards a birtday gift so i felt like 1070 was the right choice
>>702663697
runs most games well above 60fps and I'm totally loving my new pg279q cause nothing is worse than screen tearing
1070 at 3440x1440. Can pretty much max every game out 60+ fps except for star citizen which gets 40 - 60 fps.
>>702675715
I still have my 6970 in my old case along with my 8 year old q6600, going to give it to my son for his xmas. Will most likely update the gpu before I do though
>>702676075
I have no idea, bought the card preowned and immediately put on new compound because I knew the old compound needed to be replaced.
Dual 1080's, All of them?
960 oc 2 bf1,bf4,ow and any other shitty games is above 200
>>702676404
Take it back apart and make sure the compound looks like it spread properly. Also, if there is a copper block where it meets the gpu, make sure its not bent away from where it will meet the gpu and causing excessive space.
Those old 69xx cards did run warm, so any loss of cooling efficiency will make them run hot.
If you're running dual/multi monitors, they will idle warm, but in the 60s seems pretty warm.
>>702676340
Probably should. The 6970 is SOOOOO LOUD
>>702676669
Third party cards werent bad, the stock blower fan does get loud
>>702663697
> Be a GPGPU engineer.
> Program for platforms from Jetson, to Quadro.
> Have multi CPU, multi GPU workstation at home.
> Don't even play mine sweeper.
>>702667276
>>702673101
what he said. fuck physx
>>702663697
>>702663783
GTX 1080, even more of them.
>>702676669
I only ever noticed it loud when my computer was posting. It's cold here in Scotland so temps can stay quite low
>>702663697
gtx 960 - runs gta v on mostly high at solid 60
I'm not a big gamer and running stuff on medium/high is perfectly fine for me and certainly not worth double the price for higher quality textures flying past me faster than i can focus on anyway.
>>702663697
1080 g1 gaming i can play any thing on 4k with 60 or 50 fps
most games even higher
HD 7950
I play flight simulator and Dayz sometimes and I average 30-45
GTX 660
Pretty much none unless I make it look turbo peasant. Hopefully getting a 1070 at least sometime soon
Which spelling card are you using OP ?
>>702677012
When I play games the fan raches 3000 rpm, but if it is heavily demanding then it reaches 4000. The max mine can do is 6400.
>>702677574
If you're still at 1080p save some cash and just get a 1060, it will max everything at that res
>>702677310
That's the reason I went for a 1440p 165hz monitor, fuck 4k at this point in time, graphics cards aren't ready for it yet and struggle to produce very high frames on ultra
>>702677724
Was thinking about that, but I want to get my triple monitor surround up and running again for new games not just old ones.
>>702665008
my nigga
>>702677806
i dont play on 4k i play 1080
>>702663944
Same same brother vapor here
>>702673488
Ay but how much super sampling can you switch on? Mine GTX 980 TI (watercooleed) boils itself when I get to suparsampling x2 on quite a few games
>>702663697
SLI Pascal Titan X's.
Almost 2.5 grand. I got them in yesterday.
>>702679310
On a 4k monitor or were you just saying it plays everything at 50-60fps?
>>702679695
>Graphics cards to play video games - $2500
>Virginity - Priceless
R9 270x.
Don't know, I don't really play games and when I do, it's old titles that can easily run on a 2012 laptop on the iGPU
>>702679880
no im playing on a 1080 monitor but im going to a new one as soon i get my money from work
>>702680311
Are you going 4k? I've got a friend who bought a 4k monitor and has a 980ti. He plays rainbow six siege a lot but cant even get it to play on highest settings, when he does turn them down I noticed a lot of screen tearing but he seems to live with it ok. Me personally I cant stand it and that's the reason I bought a monitor with gsync and also with 1440p
Gtx 635M. No games
>>702681468
Got a 1080 on the way tho
Sapphire R9 390 Nitro. All games, highest settings at +60 FPS
sapphire hd6870
oc 950/1150
not any decent titles run at stable 60+
>>702681029
first up you gotta tell your friend not to play rainbow six siege because its fucking trash
sometimes i have some screentearing in ark survivle which i hardly never play but i wouldnt recommend him to upgrade the difference isnt that great
i bought it because my gtx 469 was getting a little old
>>702663697
560 ti. I can run bf1 at 30 fps on low with alot of skipped and frozen frames. Guess its time to upgrade.
>>702673647
Here's a very easy formula:
1060 - 60 points
1070 - 90 points = Costs 30% more than 1060
1080 - 120 points = Costs 60% more tahn 1060
All three are accepable, but 1070 is future proof, but the 1080 is the master, but still overkill. If you have a budget, go for the 1070.
>>702682552
*i meant my 460
280x
I run most NES games at a solid 60fps. I have an RX480 arriving in a week. Hopefully I'll be able to handle emulating the blast processing of the Genesis with that.
For all those talking about g-sync - its a lie. there is no need for g sync. I have a 144hz Acer and my friend has the Acer predator g-sync version. There is very little between the 2, and I have yet to experience screen tare
titan x 12gb uber-ultra