1) vice city
2) San Andreas
Any other order is just wrong.
1. san andreas
2. gta 5
3. vice city
You are actually right. Vice City > all other GTA games, both in story and in general feeling (80's Miami full of Scarface referentes? Way better than be a nigger in shit city).
Well, what do you know? For onde OP wasn't a faggot.
“I see now that the circumstances of one's birth are irrelevant. It is what you do with the gift of life that determines who you are.”
It's not about being a nigger, it's about going to Burger Shot with Big Smoke and listening to him order. I think you should replay it with better ideals.
You fail to see the bigger picture.
You control a black man.
You can make a black man kill himself.
In many ways.
Control other black men with respect.
Come on, think harder man.
San Andreas has the most mystery still tied to it.
Explain why you feel it's the worst, or empty.
VC was the best in that generation
San Andreas is better than V and had more shit to do
V is better than IV but IV has the best rag doll physics, particle effects, and sounds
Finally, when is Rockstar going to have GTA games that have combined maps for Gen3 and a combined Gen5 map with Liberty City and San Andreas? I really wished we had combined maps of LC, VC, and SA for Gen3 and LC and SA today
The story is in their lives. Michael has a bullshit family he deals with, Trevor is fucking crazy but still shows a vast array of feelings, and Franklin is a nigger but Lamar cancels out the nig with a funnier nig so he's aight.
Any story is pointless if you don't care about it, and most stories have meaning if you pay the slightest attention. It's probably the most fleshed out story in gta too.
People seem to want a return to vice city in the upcoming games but I wouldn't unless it's set in the 80s. Maybe have a story that spans across not only multiple cities but also multiple decades
Old map was more interesting, the new one is way bigger but it's because they added a bunch of copypasted streets and it hasn't got the same feeling. But you can simply avoid wandering around into random streets and it will be okay so it's not that bad so stick to the main roads and you won't get lost.
>VC was the best in that generation
Wrong. It has the absolute worst gameplay of any 3D GTA. Even GTAIII has better gameplay. Just because you think the 80s is c00l doesn't make it a better game.
The old map had more depth to it, not to mention more cities and towns. The old map was also boat and plane friendly. You could go out side the map for quite a while. Also the fact that LC was playable in SA was a plus
>San Andreas is better than V and had more shit to do
> had more shit to do
>3 full sized cities, 4 if you count LC
>3 military bases
>More boat friendly
>More airstrips to land on
>Mt Chillad was vehicle friendly with 3 routes to drive up it and you could land planes on it
>The mine shaft was a huge hole in the map
>More emergency vehicles
>More military vehicles
SA was ahead of its time
Does anybody else feel like V could be better? It is fun and all, but ever since it came out I feel like it just felt wrong. It feels like a guided tour or something, a look-but-don't-touch environment
Motion blur made me sick
The Flying Tank
>SA had a working LHA that was explorable from the start
>V got a carrier almost a year after release and it is only accessible for a few minutes in one mission
V is a no fun zone
>Entering in cheats to have cops fuck off and spawning a Hunter to get shit done even faster
Which GTA map do you spend the most time on?
I would kill my Guinea pig to have a new vice city style gta. Hell. I'd kill it for a HD remake of vice city. What I'm trying to say is that I like vice city. And I want to kill my Guinea pig.
I wouldn't mind having a boat friendly GTA title again. I would like to see some swamp areas and maybe a Cape Canaveral area. I imagine a reboot of VC would be like Vespucci everywhere
>Does anybody else feel like V could be better? It is fun and all, but ever since it came out I feel like it just felt wrong. It feels like a guided tour or something, a look-but-don't-touch environment
I feel the same way
Dunno, they really put everything into Los Santos and seemed to piss on everything else. What made me even more disappointed was the fact that they didn't expand when they went to PS4/Xbox1/PC. They gave us first person view and a few new vehicles
The map isnt varied enough in V. You got los Santos and the back secluded parts. In SA you had those plus last Ventura's and San fierro, plus the wooded area which was much bigger