Pull out your tin foil hats. What is your favorite conspiracy?
>sinking of the Titanic
while i realize that conspiracies do happen from time to time, i highly doubt that most of the modern theories hold any weight.
We went to the moon: If you have a strong enough telescope you can SEE the evidence for yourself.
9/11 was much more likely to be a carefully executed attack by radical islamic terrorists than a massive government-wide coverup.
As for JFK: Literally anyone who understands physics and bullet trajectories would understand how Oswald pulled off that shot. it wasn't a magic bullet, he had a perfect line of sight and he was a trained marine.
>We went to the moon
Yep, because if we'd faked it, the Russians, who had all the tracking tech available, would have disproved it in an instant
>9/11 was much more likely to be a carefully executed attack by radical islamic terrorists than a massive government-wide coverup.
Absolutely, it wasn't fucking rocket science. Claiming the Bush had the capability to orchestrate such a massive smokescreen is giving that idiot far too much credit
>Rosewell happened. It was some kind of alien craft they recovered alien body's.
>Watergate who cares.
>9/11 those rag heads attacked us.
>Moon landing happened. We need to go back now and then to Mars. USA!
>Titanic heard this before makes you wonder. I could see this one.
>JFK was a setup. Lee was setup. We all know it and no one cares anymore.
>It was some kind of alien craft they recovered alien body's.
It was a weather balloon. It was disproved decades ago. No aliens were found, because we haven't been visited by aliens - ever
Yes we know this. This is a fact. We stupid as fuck for allowing it to happen.
The government has changed that story and tweaked it. Believe what you want. The newspapers the next morning had UFO crash in the head lines. We know it and many other UFO crashed during this time. But people want to believe alien are fake cause it scares us.
world of differenc ebetween 'lapping up the official story' and looking at the facts yourself and coming to your own conclusion. Who's the sheep?
Doesn't scare me in the slightest, but when you look at the numbers, no-one knows we're here. Of course there is life on other planets, it's just we're too spread out to ever bump into each other
This is a delicious cheeseburger, the perfect stoner food.
>free fall speed
Yes, of course that could happen. The sheet weight of the falling sections caused a concertina effect.
Don;t forget, that Towers DIDN'T have a concrete core, this is a fact that is often overlooked by theorists. If it did have a core, the buildings would not have collapsed in the way they did. They collapsed in that way because of the way they were constructed
It happened over forty years ago and by today's standards of treachery isn't a big deal. Despite that, the word is forever connected with and eclipses anything richard nixon (and to the entire republican leadership to a lesser extent) ever did, and is now the suffix of any modern scandal (deflategate, hillarygate...)
Probably the JFK one, not because I believe in it but because of how ridiculous it is that other people believe in it.
I swear, by the way believers in the conspiracy talk, you'd think that JFK was flying by in a Ferrari and Oswald made the shot from a mile away with a black powder musket.
I have to explain to them that JFK was crawling by at ~8mph and that Oswald made the shot from a mere 80 yards away using a modern carbine rifle, one with which he was intimately familiar.
The shot didn't require a super sophisticated sniper rifle or a stationary target. It didn't require much of anything really. It was a pretty unimpressive feat.
We all know rag heads did it. Now could this dude been their inside man and got the info and resources they needed? Why not. They call would be dead at the end of this. So they could never come out talking about it.
Fire, 10 storey tall hole in an entire corner of the building and a fire fuelled by the explosion of a massive tank of deisel for the generators.
What a few facts between friends?
that apple has sabotaged samsungs battery manufacturer by putting in people to add things into the battery chemicals so that they aren't safe ,thus they then get a better vantage when their new phone goes on sale
this is a new rumour i've heard so i would appreciate it if you kept it to yourselves
kind of, except no. Like, hebrew numerics (Gematriah) dont work that. Vav is used for six, but samech is used for sixty, so samech vav would be used to denote sixty six. This is hebrew's alphabet as well, and hebrew only has 22 letters, so their numbers only have symbols for denote up to 400, so in order represent the six hundred, they would have to do tuf resh samech vav for 666.
Also, because these are both numbers and letters, hebrew words have numeric values also, which certain jewish mystics have magical powers. Including apparently, the writer of the book of revelations. Apparently Nero's hebrew name has the value of 666. The book at the time was meant to be political allegory, and his target audience (other crazy jewish mystics) would have known exactly what he was talking about.
Which leads right into this mess
No. It doesn't. They've demonstrated that it was more than possible to fire those 3 shots in 11 seconds, and the trajectory of the bullets were absolutely consistent with Oswald's position in the schoolbook depository once the height of the limo's car seats were taken into consideration.
Three shots in just under 6 seconds from an old and not well maintained BOLT action rifle, one a dead center headshot, on a moving target stretches credibility in the single-shooter explanation to the breaking point
numerology is gay.
He was certainly working with a number of other people and they had all been trained for this purpose, but that was deliberately covered up. As for the second part of your statement, 'he was he stupid fuck you us', I'm going to assume that you had some kind of aneurysm as you were typing.
WTC 7 was carved out on the bottom 2 floors by the debris from the falling towers, and was collapsping from the inside long before what you see in the now-famous gif happened. In the full version you can see the AC housing collapsing inside before the building falls
As for the pentagon, there's no conspiracy, there's hundreds of images of plane debris that ties in with the official record. Confirmation bias is a bitch
How about the balls on Guggenheim:
"Tell my wife, if it should happen that my secretary and I both go down, tell her I played the game out straight to the end. No woman shall be left aboard this ship because Ben Guggenheim was a coward."
Whooo now! This thread is 100% real. This theories are up there with Anicent Aliens. Get over the butt hurt son. Also apple has a group of fags who would do this to Samsung or LG. Those people are fucking crazy.
That's not how the seats were. JFK's seat was actually higher than Connally's. That's the part they didn't take into consideration at first. Look it up, or, if you're lazy, I'll do it for you.
so what if kennedy looked backwards over his left shoulder while leaning a bit over the back of his car?
And yes, bullets may change their direction when entering a body or hitting a bone.
He could have pulled the trigger but been paid off by someone up higher and been like he said, a patsy, jfk was talking about doing stuff for your country and destroying the cia
Each tower was supported by a structural core extending from its bedrock foundation to its roof. The cores were rectangular pillars with numerous large columns and girders, measuring 87 feet by 133 feet. The core structures housed the elevators, stairs, and other services. The cores had their own flooring systems, which were structurally independent of the floor diaphragms that spanned the space between the cores and the perimeter walls. The core structures, like the perimeter wall structures, were 100 percent steel-framed.
Also, in a catastrophic failure of the upper floors pancaking down, there would be a small, but measurable amount of time it would take each floor to collapse. The floor below the collapse would not start to fail until weight/ pressure overwhelmed the structural integrity of the floor being pancaked.
As the weight and speed of the multiple falling floors increased on the way down, that time would be less and less at each floor, but would still be relatively easily detectable.
That sounds like the exact opposite of the captain in the Costa Concordia disaster
>According to investigators, Captain Schettino left the ship by around 23:30. In one telephone call from the Coast Guard to Schettino, Captain Gregorio Maria De Falco repeatedly ordered Schettino to return to the ship from his lifeboat and take charge of the ongoing passenger evacuation. At one point in the call, De Falco grew so angry at Schettino's stalling that he raised his voice and told Schettino, "Vada a bordo, cazzo!" (translated as "Get the fuck [back] on board!", "Get [back] on board, for fuck's sake!" or "Get on board, damn it!" depending on the source). One of these calls took place at 01:46.
uhh - no?
To be fair, i didn't "educate" myself using youtube videos with scary music and emotional bombardments, empty phrases and literally no proof yet, so i might not be up to date with the current assumptions of conspiracy theorists.
because you're obviously not looking in the right places
Do me a favour and copy and paste some credibly-written text from a non-conspiracy website.
The 'cores' of the building were there for stability - they were not the lynchpins of the building - the buildings needed to flex because of their size and if the cores were of the same type as in similar buildings, there would have been no flexibility and the building would have been damaged in the first 60mph+ winds they had.
This is the site that can't count to 5 and you want us to talk conspiracy theories? Well watch the Jesse Ventura show that came on for a while he did a few good ones. The one where all the rich and powerful men go in the woods and fap was interesting. The government controlling the weather. Many more.
To prevent faggot reporters from exploiting the situation because they have literally no sense of pride or honor. They would take pictures of their own burning mother if that'd profit them.
This is not the one I'm thinking of. It's some dumb mishmash of clips a YouTuber made, but I think it gets the point across.
The one I'm thinking of was in the documentary JFK: Beyond Conspiracies. They show it on the History Channel all the time. That one had a much better demonstration. I'll keep trying to find it...
oh, there were massive fuckups at all levels, including the guy who gave flying lessons to a bunch of arabic guys who only wanted to know how to 'fly' the plane, not take-off or land. just Fly.
Plus the massive secret service fuckups that allowed these guys onto planes in the first place.
Archaeologists from the Khovd museum were alerted to the burial site in the Altai Mountains by locals who had discovered it, and the grave was located 2803 meters above sea level, which combined with the cool temperatures, helped to preserve the three metre deep tomb.
Most importantly and scientifically, people on the internet feel that the shoes the mummy is wearing are evidence of time travel...
The laces appear a little like the iconic stripes on the German brand's trainers, which of course can only mean one thing - definitive and conclusive proof that time travel is 100 per cent real.
Sandy Hook shooting was a poorly concealed play by the left to scare people into supporting gun bans.
>Barely any emergency services showed up when the attack was called in
>One of the 'dead' children was seen shortly after
>Multiple conflicting testimonies
Actually, the cores of the buildings were designed to allow the buildings to withstand this very type of scenario - a plane flying into them. Those cores were also designed to help in the event of an earthquake.
I could very much believe this one tbf
The entire political system might as well be one massive conspiracy theory at this point, hell it wouldn't even be a theory because everyone's already fully aware of the fact that politics is entirely based around nothing but corruption, just no one does anything about it
No, it isn;t.
Time travel will never be possible. The closest thing we've ever been able to do it transport light photons a few nano-seconds into the future. Try doing that with a human being with no targeting vector and you're fucked.
plus, if it were possible to go back in time, someone would have proved it definitively by now
Yeah looks to be the start to take our guns.
Butt hurt. Aliens have been here get over it man. Your heart knows is true. You can feel the Dark Side calling you. Let go and embrace the hate.
Yes that was it. They made a mistake and the child got caught on camera. Also one of the parents was seen laughing and smiling on camera but the moment he realized he was on camera he started balling like a child. Nice acting
That may be partially true, but they weren't strong enough to withstand thousands and thousands of tonnes of steel and concrete suddenly collapsing in a vertical direction. they may have been designed to withstand a side-on impact - which they did, but then the fire and heat destabilised the building to over and above anything it was designed to repel
I just laugh. You are all so oblivious. It doesnt matter if any of these are real or if any of you believe them. What is coming has been in the works for thousands of years. None of you could ever minutely affect a change. WW3 is here soon and the planets population will be reduced to 300 million. Have fun while you still have time left.
It'd seem you haven't educated yourself at all.
You just have to read the Warren Commission report.
Ain't no bullshit about it.
*That's* the official story.
>the planets population will be reduced to 300 million
I thought conspiracies were only supposed to only be based around doing evil shit? Reducing the global population is exactly what the world needs right now, I hope they hurry the fuck up
This has also been disproved
here's my little story. In 2002 I was accused of molesting a 4 year old girl. I didn;t do it, but I was shitting myself. When i went for my police interview i was smiling and joking with the officers there, but when it came to actually talking about what I was accused of, i fucking crumbled.
It's disassociation. you really think that guy wanted to consrtantly think about his murdered child 24/7? before he had to talk about the subject, he wouldhave seemed fine, but once he knew he had to start talking about it, the emotions would have kicked in. it's just humanity
CIA killed MLK jr. The government was scared blacks and white liberals were coming together because it meant they weren't in control of the direction the country was going. Corruption and politics is why he died, not racism.
correct - i really don't care that much about how some american president was allegely shot
>transporting light into the future...
Is just me or does that sound completely retarded. I transported light into the future today when I turned on the bathroom light to take a shit.
Does slavery explain that the great pyramid is an 8 sided pyramid? Or that it sits in the exact center of the earths landmass or the 100 or so other things slaves couldn't know?
Research just a little before you show the world how fucking stupid you are.
>now widely accepted
By theorists alone.
the rate of collapse is skewed, depending on the POV of the observer, because the buildings were so fucking huge.
This is the ultimate theory:
Romans, Greeks, Acient Egypt, etc never existed.
All of human history occurred during of after the middle ages.
>Absolutely, it wasn't fucking rocket science. Claiming the Bush had the capability to orchestrate such a massive smokescreen is giving that idiot far too much credit
Not that I think 9/11 was an inside job, but if Bush was actually smart and cunning enough to pull of an inside job 9/11, that he would play a useful idiot on national tv so as to not draw suspicion to himself.
Its normal to believe in conspiracy theories when you're shocked and scared. Just something to think about
You can only go back to the point were the first time machine was created, and forward to the last one was destroyed. Do you even time travel?
I'm afraid that we've gone far beyond the point where you can claim that evidence doesn't matter because not enough people heard of it. Even debunkers have to accept the fact that thermite was at ground zero, it is provable.
Because "white privledgists" are tired of all the niger twerk videos on Jewbook! Zuckerman was going to use this satellite to connect all of Africa to the internets.
Dude, around the time of the pyramids, some guy used a stick and a hole in the ground 10 miles apart to accuratelty measure the circumference of the planet, and he was only out about by 50 miles. These people were fucking geniuses
Well, i've also seen videos of obama going on stage with a skateboard and ufos flying arround and shit. Video editing isn't even hard anymore, in this video the car was edited out till it cuts off the car driving in front of the car with the camera.
Also some say they swapped it with the Olympic since there was a construction flaw with the sister ship. While you can't fake icebergs their recommended course was many miles south of where they were due to warnings about icebergs.
The guy on the left looks like Sayid's friend on Lost.
>you would probably be one of the people getting rekt
Holy shit really I never considered that
Fucking no shit I'd be one of the people getting rekt, doesn't change the fact it's what the world needs if the human race wants to survive more than 100 more years
Obvious samefagging is obvious. But I'll let you off because both made me lol. Actually thats a flat out lie. Both caused me to smirk with mild amusement but thats close enough.
In the article "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe", which appeared in the Open Chemical Physics Journal, authors Niels Harrit of the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry, Jeffrey Farrer of Brigham Young University's Department of Physics and Astronomy, Steven E. Jones, and others state that thermite and nano-thermite composites in the dust and debris were found following the collapse of the three buildings, which they conclude to be proof that explosives brought down the buildings. The article contained no scientific rebuttal and the editor in chief of the publication subsequently resigned.
Fags that think they'll time travel forgetting the time machine travels through time not space. Chances are the galaxy has expanded/shifted and solar system moved and you'd be in outer space.
>Russian apartment bombings
>1999 bombings were a false flag attack coordinated by the FSB to win public support for a new full-scale war in Chechnya, which boosted Prime Minister and former FSB Director Vladimir Putin's popularity, and brought the pro-war Unity Party to the State Duma and Putin to the presidency within a few months
what i find funny in conspiracy theorist, is that it´s "proof" for them if any people who are "experts" just claim things.
Like some people say that they found "nanotermite" in world trade center, but there is no pictures where you can see it on ground zero, no documents, just some fagots claiming things be like they are.
Second is, that if you try to explain to them, that 600° celsius is enough to reduce the strenght of steal by 50% and the fire in wtc had about 900° up, they dont react to that statement.
I mean i have a quite good education and physical knowledge, so its unfair to call them retards. Also good friends of mine claim the 911 conspiracy theory. I just stopped discussing that topic with them but adviced them to not talk about this topic too much.
The cosmonaut driver was an alcohol
Interesting, but not one of those pages has refuted at all the findings of the University of Copenhagen's Department of Chemistry or Brigham Young University's Department of Physics and Astronomy, and to date, no credible source yet has. If thermite was not used in 9/11, why was it provably found in the wreckage?
"The evidence for the presence of thermite at the World Trade Center (WTC) on 9/11 is extensive and compelling. This evidence has accumulated to the point at which we can say that WTC thermite is no longer a hypothesis, it is a tested and proven theory."
what was that about a minute ago about it not being a theory or something
who comes up with this stuff!
guys the federal government would never lie to it's own people. And if you seriously believe what wiki leaks says about the democrats and republicans controlling the media then you are simply retarded, they are just paranoid and wants attention because they can't make it big in Hollywood
I think I would know about it if the feds ever lied. Go get educated and stop being paranoid on /B/
Clinton can't get his D wet without it becoming front-page news, a secret that only 2 people would have had to keep.
An elaborate plan with holographic planes, rerouted flights, planted explosives, a conspiracy that hundreds of people would had to have been made privy to if not actively engaged in... TOTALLY POSSIBLE. FACT. IT HAPPENED.
again just some bullshit blablabla.
Where is pictures of thermite?
WHY IS THERE ALWAYS SO MUCH BLABLABLA IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES.
Cant you just speak with common sense?
Its more awful than hearing a atom physicist talking about his subject.
The main problem about oscar is that he dies soon after beeing put together - there have been successful tests in applying brain-electronic interaction, and some muscle - electrics interactions, but they all have in common that we can't replicate some chemical processes that happen within the body and the body dies due to this.
It was hit by massive amounts of debris. It even looks crooked in this fucking picture.
He's right though. If you can't explain it without resorting to these kinds of words in order to appear more intellegent you might aswell stop. They don't add anything to the argument.
i don't recall that you said that. i only recall that you linked an article that proved the point that you argued against only minuted prior, which leads me to believe that you linked it without even reading it.
what was it going to collapse from, the '' terrorist '' attack or old age? i'm not very well informed on 9/11. but WTC 7 makes absolutely no sense and makes it hard for me to believe the rest of the official story.
not to mention that false flag operations are not a new thing.
I seriously believe that everything (including you faggots) is only a dream in my mind.
>You need to keep pace with the rest of the species
Hey, i'll admit - my english isn't perfect, and yes, i have to check a word here and there to get what peopl mean, but i do think me speaking three languages qualifies as "keeping pace with the rest of the species". But yea, enjoy your pointless cocky attitude and refusal to adress the actual issue.
I have no problem with you spelling words wrong or having trouble understanding the language. What I have a problem with is when you believe that it's my responsibility to educate you. If you don't understand part of my argument, Google can teach you, but you can't actually tell me that you being unable to understand my argument makes my argument weaker.
as i said. conspiracy theorists are so caught in their own world, that they refuse any logic arguments.
Its just about denouncing people who think different not about letting the different theories compete against each other.
Its really sad. I mean I love to learn new things and if i find something i fought was true is acutally wrong I am happy that i know more now. I dont have to identify myself with some theories, i have more going on in my life than hating the western world.
Did they? Did they also say the nature of the damage inflicted wasn't enough to cause a collapse? Because I'll bet they didn't.
Wow. I had no idea! Thanks, Anon! You sure are smart!
In all seriousness, there's only one "conspiracy theory" that I actually believe in, and frankly, it's not one I care an awful lot about -- at all.
Marilyn Monroe was killed. She was too close to the Kennedys, and the Kennedys were smart enough to know what Clinton seemed to overlook -- scandalous bitches be scandalous.
It would have taken one guy to go in there, pop her in the arm with a lethal dose of her prescribed sedative, hold her down for a minute, and it's goodnight, Marilyn. Done.
In the reality we currently reside in, the 'facade' in terms of architecture is the part of the building that sets the tone for the rest of the design, meaning the outward, aesthetic parts that are most visible to everyone. Meaning not the parts that hold the building up.
How did the researcher get the material to test in a paper published 8 years after the event
How significant is the qualitty they found versus the quantity you might expect to find in the aftermath of an explosion to bring down two buildings of that size
Also, how was the building rigged with so much explosive without people knowing?
I'm not sure how they got material to test, but considering that it's never been scientifically debunked despite many trying, I can only assume that their methods were sound ( I have not actually considered the study at hand myself, though).
As for the other questions you propose, those needs to be investigated as well, but the first step to that is to accept the fact that Thermite was found in the ruins. It could be that the thermite was there for a completely unrelated reason, but it was there nonetheless.
No doing your homework for you since you are so well read on the subject."they have" sure is a credible source... You would have to be a blithering idiot to believe Oswald could have done this alone...
You know there is a rover on mars right?.... and we have never been to mars.... So your "evidence" is not actually evidence of anything except that we can drop things off on planetary bodies and moons...
>still not posting anything to contradict the points I made
This is the first post I've read that is actually made by a thinking person... The solar system is moving.. the galaxy is moving the supercluster we are in is moving....
A time traveler should bring a lot of oxygen because they would end up floating in space...
>Meaning not the parts that hold the building up.
I want the citation that says it was only the facade that was damaged. I also want the citation that says the multi-floor fires inside in conjunction with the imapct damage wouldn't have brought about a collapse. I want the NIST citation that says the damage inflicted on the building wasn't enough to bring it down. Because if NIST says the building fell down because of factors involving the damage inflicted, and not a controlled demolition, your position is worthless.
i think youre allright. Everyone has his problems. I for myself now started boxing and spanish lessons to get out of the house more.
I really have to get out more.
I recently read that google wants to put a tool online for blind people to tell them whats to be seen in a picture. Could it be, that we are helping to create that tool with the captures?
How does a multi-floor fire start inside of a building hit with a small amount of debris on the outside, and how does it burn hot enough to cause that building to not fall over, but to collapse? What makes the NIST a reliable source?
Maybe you could enlighten me as to my 'position'. I don't have to prove that it was a controlled demolition, I just have to display how essentially unprovable it is that the building collapsed because of fires caused by external damage. In fact, it's the only steel bar reinforced concrete building to ever collapse due to a fire in human history. Now ain't that just quacking crazy, jimbo?
It's common knowledge to firemen that even after a fire was "stopped" that the burning inside can go on for a long period of usually up to a week. This assumption goes for average buildings, therefore the time the wtc would keep burning internally would increase because it's much larger than your average building. That also means that the rubble has a much larger temperature capacity and comparably less surface of stuff that can heat up and conserve the heat.
The generator in the basement was deisel powered. The debris hitting the building could easily start a small electrical fire. Fire moves. Deisel tank ignites and there you have it. Raging fire.
Nah, you can see it with a telescope. We have telescopes that can get a decent glimpse of a planet in the next solar system over, you don't think we can still see those bootprints? I'm sure that you won't actually believe it until someone actually sits you in front of a telescope, though.
Go smoke more weed bro!
Its the only way to protect from the Illuminati, they've created a laser that controls our thoughts, it was funded by Rothschild family using alien technology
That's possible, but it's a long shot. Considering the damage was only to the facade of the building, a small electrical fire is not out of the question but how exactly does it find its way to the basement in a timely enough manner to allow these fires to burn all afternoon? And how does a diesel fire get hot enough to melt the concrete reinforced structural support beams of a building so as to not cause it to fall over to one side as expected, but to collapse perfectly into its own footprint in a timely manner?
Diesel isn't flammable .
Plus solid steel columns
Plus did I mention WTC7 was the Emergency Command Bunker designed to survive....well more then some rubble smashing a few windows .
Yes... offices are full of burnable things...like fireproof carpet...and paper inside of steel cabinets oh and drywall.... big fires from drywall...
fucking kids... believe every spiderman episode as fact...
Diesel fuel is flammable. Their excuse for the sprinkler system not putting the fire out is that it had extremely low water pressure, which is possible. However, a diesel fire could not burn hot enough to cause the type of damage exhibited.
>We have telescopes that can get a decent glimpse of a planet in the next solar system over
We don't actually see those planets though. We measure the light intensity of the star and record it. If it gets a little (we're talking about extremely small variations here) darker in regular intervalls you've found yourself something that's rotating the star. Depending on the changes of the composition of the light we can assume what the mass is made off and therefore calculate a mass and a approximated path of the planet.
laugh it up idiots
u thenk its funny now but ur btfo when shit hits the fan and the truth comes out.
theres a mysterious life form thats been here for the past 30 years it watches us and interacts with us but ur all to dumb to notice
>What makes the NIST a reliable source?
So you're saying dude shouldn't have relied on NIST to establish there wasn't enough damage of the right kind to cause the building to collapse?
>Diesel isn't flammable
It's not nearly as volatile and explosive as gasoline under normal conditions, but it's extremely flammable. It wouldn't be used as a fucking fuel if it wasn't flammable...
No I work with petroleum products...it's not flammable . But please explain YOUR THEORY how fire from a collapsing building 600 ft away managed to get fire into the basement of WTC 7 and make a diesel tank ignite?!
>dis is gonna be gud
REALLY fucking far. Earth orbits at about 60000 miles per hour and the solar system moves at about 500000 miles per hour so in just one day the distance the planet has moved relative to a stationary point in the universe is mind-bendingly huge.
>Now ain't that just quacking crazy, jimbo?
Depends on what actually occurred. As far as I know, no building had ever been so close to the chaotic collapse of a 110 story building before either.
please... show me where your "friends" can burn drywall.. its ok..I'll wait..
what exactly burned in those "office fires" that lasted 6 weeks?
My friend the chemicl engineer says your friend the volunteer at the handicapped home is full of shit..
>GU Piscium b: 11±2 jupiter masses, 163000 years rotation period