>won't get fat
You could have a 10/10 in your bed
>mfw thats everything I desire in a woman
who needs a sex robot when you could have this
Yeah... Scientific ethics committees need to get in that shit real soon.
>You first awaken into the world, full of knowledge but empty of memory
>"What is my purpose?"
>*A fat neckbeards stuffs his cock in your throat*
No true AI in sex dolls.
>know that noone will love me
>decide to go to a third world country and forcefully take a dirty sandnigger wife
>die from 3rd world disease and stds
Fuck that. I would rather have a AI sexdoll rather than a dirty subhuman. Shagging a shitskin is like playing russian roulette with your dick.
I know this is bait, but fuck it.
>have a nagging bitch by your side, telling you what to do, what to wear, etc
>she will never change her state of mind or her personality to please you
>she will become bored of you and vise versa
Shall I go on
You do know that the number of women who consider themselves feminist has been going down over time, right? Especially in the past few years. The minority is vocal, but they are very much the minority.
Your guess is wrong.
People are seeing more and more that 3rd wave feminists are full of shit. If five years ago you made a joke disparaging feminists on a college campus, you'd likely only get a few nervous chuckles at best, and more likely people would wonder if you're a misogynist.
Nowadays you crack a joke at feminists' expense, and people laugh at it, because people know it's all bullshit.
Joke's on you ! I'm already a creep and I don't even own one yet !
Sure, you can say that femenism is reaching a decline. But it still spread ideas to the first world women to be extra needy, gain more weight and change what they like in a person.
So much you don't get from it that a real girl gives though like a cuddle or an unexpected kiss. As well as all the other good stuff.
Although once the technology is there to make a robot that could pass the Turing Test but still being programmed to being the 'perfect wife' then I'd imagine women will become obsolete.
Ok, maybe you just didn't get what I meant. I accept that less people are labeling themselves "feminists." What I am asking is: does that mean that less women are embracing feminist ideals (i.e. they're getting their asses back in the kitchen) or is it just that the meaning of the word "feminist" has changed?
Considering how much the actual feminists insist that anyone who "values equality and advancement of women" calls themself a feminist, I think it's more likely people are just washing their hands of it and backing off.
They got too loud and too stupid, and eventually people wised up.
I gotz mine! At least a part of her.
My girlfriend looks like OPs pic anyway plus she is really smart and likes nerdy things whilst still being sexy with it.
People who buy realdolls are pathetic, me and my gf laugh at losers like that.
DS-Dollsweet under $3,000.
Worth every penny.
Alright anon, I can take you this far, but I dare not go further.
Fare thee well, brave traveler! May your quest be successful!
you call that old school?
That's the thing. They don't want to call themselves feminists anymore because now, when they think of a "feminist," they think of pic related, some loud-mouthed dyke who's constantly triggered by mundane bullshit. They won't call themselves feminists but they still want the same feminist bullshit:
>same career opportunities as men
>same pay as men
>freedom from housework
while refusing to give up any of their other perks:
>guys buy the drinks
>guys buy the meals
>guys pay the bills at home
>guys hold the doors open
>guys do all the home repairs
It's still feminism, they just don't like to call it that anymore.
Wait, you have a problem with a level playing field? I'm not talking about the wage gap shit, that's been debunked, what I'm asking is do you actually have a problem with them having the same career opportunities, not being expected to keep the house while having a job, that kind of thing?
I mean, that shit's just egalitarianism. Equality.
This! This is what I was talking about. Why the fuck do they have drawings in their product gallery?
Also these dolls may be half the price of a real doll, but they look a lot worse.
And I don't think this >>702156005 is one of those ones.
Why is Irish hate everywhere on 4chan tonight? Did they bomb a school or something?
I'd probably get one if it was a great representation of a particular celeb I could never have.
Of course, they'd try to sue the shit out of companies for stealing their likenesses, but what would probably happen is that they just market a "custom" model, and offer the celebs as customs without using their names.
Her tits are about 2 cups too small, and she looks a couple years too old.
Organic chemist baby, working for the devil himself.
Well, as long as you keep it locked up in a box when you aren't home. If I knew someone that had one of these, I'd intentionally break in and fuck the doll just to mess with their head.
I never noticed that Lina looks like a sex doll.
Read the whole post, not just the first part. They don't actually want equality. That's how they try to sell it publicly, but that isn't what they really want. They want everything that men have career-wise while continuing to expect men to pay for everything, etc.
Won't tell me I'm handsome
Won't tell me I'm important
Won't tell me she loves me
The goddess that resides within is a fake....just like the dolls
Yeah I'm just saying if this is really a problem for you, you're a pussy. Simple as that. Yeah, A lot of the time I'll pay for a first date, but if a girl gets too pushy about me paying for her shit, I'll tell her no, and if she has a problem with that, you just leave.
This isn't a feminist issue, it's just a human issue. Some people are cunts.
Do feminists say that men should pay for everything? Is that something feminists espouse? I don't recall ever seeing that, though I could be wrong.
Not op, but I used one of these before and it pretty much feels like how a woman would tighten her throat to grip your dick better. Just lube it up and its like 80% close to the real thing.
>if she tries to make you pay for everything, tell her to fuck off
No shit, faggot. I'm not saying that men SHOULD pay for everything. The point is that too many women expect it.
Yeah, but if you tell them to fuck off, why does it affect you? I just don't see why this is even a problem, or how it's a feminist issue for that matter.
Sure, some guys are going to get pussywhipped into paying for girl's stuff, but if that guy isn't you, why does it matter?
still saving money to get one
tfw you aint rich
>I just don't see why this is even a problem
Because it's so prevalent, especially among American women.
>or how it's a feminist issue
Because it's a direct result of the feminist movement. They got their equal rights in all of the areas where women previously had less (career opportunities, wages, etc.) but have no interest in equality when it comes to areas where men have less.
bought this at spencers fucked it like 3 times then it popped
It's a direct result of feminist? Dude, go back to when we were fucking cavemen, you think it was the women killing sabertooth tigers to bring home the meat? Men being the primary providers within a relationship is not at all a problem started by feminists.
Hell, first wave feminists actually made the world a lot BETTER in that regard, by getting women into the workplace.
The wealthy are already making these and calling them art...
You seem to believe that feminists are required to fight for men's rights as well as women's. If you feel like men are underprivileged in various ways, then try to create an actual men's rights movement.
>go back to when we were fucking cavemen
Ok, let's do that. Men were the providers, yes. Women took care of the home. Worked well.
Now, thanks to the feminist movement, women want to act like providers, without actually providing. And no one wants to take care of the home.
Okay, I think I get you. So you're saying that in the modern day, women have the same economic opportunities, basically being level with men, but they're taking the good without the bad, and still expecting the perks of being a woman in that classic male female dynamic. Is that right?
>then try to create an actual men's rights movement
Every time this topic is brought up, that's the typical response. Don't fault women for their hypocrisy and entitlement... nooooo... it's men's fault for failing to establish their own rights movement. Fuck that.
>they got what they wanted
>everything turns to shit
>from the ashes people return to the old ways
>still great to be a man
So what do you want to do about it? The way I see it is not really as a problem with feminists, just that it's a problem with people being cunts.
Feminists DON'T say men should pay for everything. Paying for a girl's date? Buying her pretty things? They call that a microaggression, asserting your financial power and male privilege over her.
Feminists don't like that stuff any more than we do.
Now, personally I think they're actually wrong about this, and people should be able to spend their money however the fuck they want, but that's just my opinion here.
It's brought up each time because it's a legitimate argument. Feminists aren't responsible for helping men out, they're focused on women. That's why they exist. If you want a group focused on men, try to create one. God knows that the current MRAs spend waaay more time complaining about feminists than they do actually trying to improve men's lives.
>things that are not equal
>should be equal
Here you go: only women can bear children. From the very start it's impossible for men and women to have exactly equal roles. And that's only one of many differences.
Putting women in colleges far more than men has been a colossal waste of time and money since they effectively nearly double the labor force (thus reducing wages), contribute or innovate little (can you name any inventions by women?), and generally quit the workforce within ten years.
Western birthrates have never, ever been lower. As a result Western countries are imported third-worlders by the millions to repopulate them, and we owe it to feminism for telling women to stop having kids and join the workforce.
nah fag, that just means you're her bitch and instead of paying with your money you're paying with your time, and since time equals money, you're not only a poor fag but a whipped fag
So you take a kind of utilitarian approach to gender roles? You see it as, men do this better, women do this better, for the good of all, we should do these things?
I also note that you mention immigrants as a bad thing.
So your ideal country would be an advanced, western nation, with tight border control and heavily controlled immigration, and rigid gender roles?
(this isn't as loaded as it sounds, I really am just asking).
And that's the root of why a lot of women no longer want to call themselves feminists. They got what they wanted. They never really wanted full equality. They just wanted equality where they had less; they don't want to give up anything where they've always had more.
>So what do you want to do about it?
Continue to call them out on their bullshit. If you're both working equal hours for equal pay, you both should be paying equal amounts toward the bills.
Okay. so the solution is don't be a bitch?
Wow. Stunning insights there. It's not like I was saying that earlier. Glad we talked this out.
>Feminists aren't responsible for helping men out
Yet men are expected to help women achieve equality in other areas. Ok m80...
If women want equality, then we all need to work toward full equality. Otherwise, I welcome the day we see this: >>702167494
Nigger, think for two goddamned seconds before you hit "Post," will you? Of course it goes beyond "not being a bitch" or telling bitches to fuck off if they tell you to pay for everything. This shit needs to be brought up every time some bitch starts whining about equality.
>MUH EQUAL CAREER AND WAGES
>Ok, let's talk equality.
>Do you pay half the rent?
>Do you pay half the utilities?
>Would you say you do half of the work around the house?
>How often do you expect your man to pay for meals?
Shove it down their goddamned throats. Make them listen to it as much as they've made us listen to their feminism bullshit for the past few decades.
>So you take a kind of utilitarian approach to gender roles? You see it as, men do this better, women do this better, for the good of all, we should do these things?
Yes. Women are excellent at nurturing. Men are better at... well just about everything else. People should stick to their strengths. The statistics about career women, while not definitive, are telling.
>I also note that you mention immigrants as a bad thing.
A population that cannot replace itself is inherently unsustainable. This is especially evident in Western welfare states where lifespans are long, government benefits are high, and the reproductive rate is low, so there are far more people not working than working.
Western countries are essentially replacing their populations with third world populations because their own women won't have children anymore.
It's about sustainability. Egalitarianism is inherently unsustainable because only women can have children, so they MUST.
By and large I agree with you, though I'd never tell women they couldn't pursue careers. Women HAVE made massive contributions to science, technology, mathematics. Perhaps not the majority, but still significant. Plus there's the human rights question of enforcing gender roles, which we would have to do if we took that kind of utilitarian stance.
I'm not saying you're wrong in principle, but you'd have to apply the idea with a gentle hand, for sure, or you're just straight up oppressing people, and the patriarchy they all scream about is suddenly real.
It was never written into law that women must be homemakers, but it became the social norm anyway. It wasn't until they began to loudly and consistently bitch about it that things started to change.
>Women HAVE made massive contributions to science, technology, mathematics.
It's never been illegal or anything to pursue careers, society just pressured them not to. Gender roles have always been enforced by society, they just aren't anymore.
Applying this idea? Hahaha. I don't think any society has ever just reversed course like that. I'm just gonna find a girl with traditional values and raise a family with. Not hard here in the deep south.
Yeah, but the people loudly and consistently bitching about it are now trying to get women to quit accepting it when guys pay for their shit. You and feminists seem to be on the same side of this issue, because the feminists also don't like it when guys pay for all a girl's stuff.
Yeah, yeah, it's almost as though individual choice can supersede societal norms! You can find your traditional woman. Women who want to get involved in the workforce can still do that.
This is a terrible idea. Look at studies about the effectiveness of women in combat. It's not good.
I didn't say it was a good idea , of course it's a bad idea . I was just pointing out that the reason women complain so much is because they have it easy now and need something to complain more about .
What a fucking thread.
Each following post is more retarded than the next. I congratulate you stupid fucks.
I haven't been talking about the individual this whole time but society as a whole. Besides the birthrate, one other horrifying effect of feminism on America is the out of wedlock child rate. Around 40% of kids today have no father. This includes 73% for the black community, which I think has very much today with the state of that community. While it doesn't affect me individually it's still important to me.
>This is a terrible idea. Look at studies about the effectiveness of women in combat. It's not good.
Agreed, which is why we must do the opposite and stop caring about gender equality. Women in combat is idiotic so them having some concessions elsewhere is fine.
>won't share interests with you
>won't conversate with you
>won't care for you
>won't massage your back
>won't warm you at night when you're cold
fuck m8 you don't know what you're doing. No serious woman will stay with you with that shit lol
The draft in general is a terrible idea. We learned that in Vietnam. It creates a fuckton of dissent among the general population and produces soldiers that are more a burden than a benefit to the military.
The fact that women are ineffective in the military is just another example of why gender equality is a ridiculous idea.