Show me how bad you are
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Show me how bad you are
1
yeah, elementary school math:
=1
its 7 if you follow BEDMAS you retarded bonobos
>>701949328
>>701949332
>>701949345
>>701949420
American math lvl
9
>>701949273
When you divide by a fraction = multiplying by the reciprocal. 9-9+1=1
>>701949273
3
>>701949449
Only the last one got it wrong m8
>>701949273
90000000
>>701949273
>>701949420
I was taught Bracket Indicies division multiplication addition subtraction
and I got 9
> 3 ÷ 1/3 = 3 x 3 = 9
> 9 - 9 + 1 = 1
nigger
>>701949605
That's cause you don't know how to divide. 3 divided by 1/3 is 9. You did 3 divided by 3. Fuck your bitchass Bidmas.
>>701949328
>>701949332
>>701949345
>>701949462
>>701949601
>>701949605
>>701949632
>>701949685
American education.
>>701949494
3÷1/3 = 1
So 9-1+1 = 9
Good luck in your life.
>>701951082
Haha you dumbshit! Fail on the first step. Get a calculator you retard
>>701949703
No.
3÷1/3 = 1
Look : 1/3 = 0.3333...
3÷0.3333 = 0.9999...
Or if you want :
3÷3 = 1
1÷1 = 1
Where the hell did you learn math ?
I don't know but I bet its over 9000
>>701951278
holy shit, how can you fail this bad?
>>701951278
You are either seriously retarded or baiting.Either way you are a faggot
>>701949273
Keep getting 9.
>>701951278
>3÷0.3333 = 0.9999...
Get a calculator, type this in.... then kill yourself
>>701951459
Not the guy you were replying to but let's try something else, let us see how stupid you are. What is 3 divided by 1/2? Maybe this will solve the stupidity in your brain.
>>701951567
6 faggot
>>701951488
you are now on the list
>>701951471
7
>>701951603
so 3 divided by 1/3 is 9, minus the 9 on the first equation then all you have left over is 1. So 1 is the answer to OP's problem. I hope this logic will help you in the future you blockhead.
>>701951567
You've gone very quiet dude.... found yourself a calculator?? haha
>>701949549
9-3=6
6÷1/3=2
2+1=3
>You are correct! You win the KFC secret recipe
>>701951679
I totally agree with you. The post I was slamming said 3/ 1/3 = 1!!
>>701951278
I honestly can't tell if you're trolling or stupid. Congratulations.
Here's a question for your dumb ass.
If 3/0.3r = 0.9r, then what is 3x0.3r?
>>701949273
9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
= 9 -1 + 1
= 9
by convention, division takes precedent
the operations of the same precedent (+ and -) are then evaluated from left to right
>>701951856
fuck
1
9 - 9 + 1
= 1
>>701951856
3 ÷ 1/3 (1/3 of 3 is 1) therefor 3 ÷ 1 = 3
9 - 3 = 6
6 + 1 = 7
>>701951853
>>701951856
I hope you morons end up with dish washing jobs, or just mopping. You can't handle 4th grade mathematics, the fact that you are out there driving scares me. You are both seriously retarded.
You guys are such retarded faggots. How can 3÷1/3 = 1 when 3÷3 =1 ?
The answer to the whole calculation is 1 because 3÷1/3=9 you Idiots. Or to explain it in retarded: You need 3 thirds to get to 1, so you need 9 thirds to get to 3.
You stupid monkeys.
>>701951987
retard alert
>>701952051
how to trigger 101
>>701951987
Dude 3 × 1/3 is one. You divide here tho, so its 9, you fucking faggot.
The answer to the calculation is 1.
>>701952014
Well said sir. They should get back to rating their cocks.
>>701951531
K... Now what?
>>701951987
this guy gets it!
anyone saying 1 or 9 needs to go back to school
>>701952127
how to trigger 101
9 - 9 + 1 = 1
Easy peasy lemonsquisy
>>701952202
try harder kid
>>701949273
9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
= 6 / (4/3)
= 4.5
faggots
>>701952286
top kek
ITT: % = *
>>701949273
This isn't even an ambiguously formatted problem
9-3/(1/3)+1
9-9+1 because dividing by a fraction is the same as multiplying by that fractions reciprocal
0+1
1
>>701952193
>press equals
>set up live stream
>post to /b/
>kill self
I had to watch a tutorial
>>701951856
>9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
>= 9 -1 + 1
You understand division doesn't work that way, right?
Here, I'll break it down for your poorly educated ass.
When you are dividing a number, you're essentially asking the question "How many times does this number go into that number?"
So, 4 divided by 2 is asking "How many times does 2 go into 4?" The answer, of course, is 2.
So, right now we're asking "How many times does one third go into three?".
Let's take it step by step. Stick with me, dumbass.
How many times does 1/3 go into 1?
That's right, 3 times. Because three thirds make one. You follow that logic? Yes?
How many times does 1 go into 3?
That's right, 3 times.
So, if 1/3 goes into 1 three times, and 1 goes into 3 three times, how many times does 1/3 go into 3?
That's right! 9 times!
Congratulations on following basic math, you useless retard. Continue to dig ditches, as it is your only worthwhile contribution to this world.
>>701951796
>offbyone.jpg
9-3=6
6÷1/3=3
3+1=4
>y'all are giving retards a bad name
>>701952286
almost there
it is actually
9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
= 9 - 3/(4/3)
= 9 - 2.25
= 6.75
see it is only the 3 divided by (4/3) not the 9-3
>>701949273
-7.88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888repeating
Ok, serious question to all of those answering other than 1. How many of you are trump supporters? Let's take a quick /b/ toll
3
so many stupid people here,
look it is easy:
9-(3/(1/3))+1
by math rules you have to turn this into:
9-(1/3*3)+1
so the answer is
9-3+1 = 8 you retards
>>701952286
>>701952429
ah, thanks - you're right it is 6.75
Instructs unclear: dick caught in ceiling fan.
>>701952409
>>701952429
>>701952471
>Samefag trying too hard, obviously knows the answer is 1.
9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
3 / (1/3) = 9
9 - 9 + 1 = 1
gg ez
>>701952371
you think you're so clever but really you're making a complete foll of yourself it is 6.75, explained much more concisely than you could right here:
>>701952429
seems it is you who will be wearing the name tag to work, mong.
>>701951605
I am a retard, I failed AS Maths.
The answer is 1
Im am an engineer
>>701952471
This has to be bait. No one is his stupid. Quick question though. People who don't answer one did you graduate high school?
>>701949273
top kek as all the Trump supporters answer with '1'
:D
>>701952631
You're are an engineering? I also.
>>701952631
see, even an illiterate moron can understand it is 1.
>>701952631
>Im am an engineer
No one gives a fuck what you are. You'll make 120k max, you fucking gypsy.
>>701952683
me two
Is it 9-3 (6) ÷ (1/3) (2) + 1 = 3
or 9- (3÷ 1/3) (1) + 1 = 9
?????????¿??????????????????
I AM STUPID
>>701952643
I think all trump supporters answered 9.
>>701952612
Fool!
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders!
The most famous is 'Never get involved in a land war in Asia,' but only slightly less well known is this: 'Never go in against an Anon when ego is on the line!'
Oh yeah baby
This post like
>>701952683
Me two...
The answer is 8.5 you fucking dolts!
>>701952783
what a mong, this is a math problem nothing to do with asia
>>701949273
pemdas
9-(3 / (1/3)) + 1
9 - 9 + 1
9 - 10
=
-1
>>701952631
wouldn't want to be on any planes you designed then muppet.
answer is 9
4.5 faggots
>>701952872
Asians invented math. Need math to make rice. Asians invented rice. Long grain is best grain. It's the only grain. One grain. One. Hence the answer is 1.
Bait levels are equal to the answer, 9001!
>>701952901
87 replies to finally get it.
>>701953009
>-9 + 1 = -10
-10 = the level of bait
>>701953009
>9 - 9 + 1 = -1
>9 + 1 - 9 = 1
American Education, ladies and gentlemen.
3
/
i refuse to believe this thread
>>701953074
>>701953107
>>701952901
Pemdas rule
addition (A) comes before substraction (S)
therefore
9 - 9 + 1
= 9 - (9 + 1)
= 9 - 10
= -1
this >>701952901 guy is just right
3+3+3+3+3+3=π∆×π=5
>>701953407
>9 - 9 + 1
>= 9 - (9 + 1)
You can't possibly be this stupid.
Fokin christ it isnt hard, first you devide 3 with 1/3 and you get 9, then you subtract the gotten 9 from the 9 in the start of the equasion and you are left with = 1. The answer is 1.
>>701953407
The three digits in that equation are Positive Nine, Negative Nine and Positive One.
There is no addition and subtraction, only cumulation.
The cumulated total of positive nine, positive one and negative nine is positive one.
>>701953407
addition and substraction are the same thing you dimwit
9-9+1= 9+(-9+1)
>>701953562
Fucking integers.
>>701953562
>>701953538
>>701953557
pemdas rule FFS
A comes before S as in pemdAS
My god we learn that at 8yo
>>701952901
You do it from left to right fuckwad
9-3/(1/3)+1
9-9+1
0+1
1
>>701949273
= 9 + (-3) x (1 / (1/3)) + 1
= 9 + (-3) x 3 + 1
= 9 + (-9) + 1
= 0 + 1
= 1
everyone who answers anything besides 1, kill yourself
>>701953793
left to right:
P->E->M->D->A ->S
ADDITION COMES FIRST YOU DICK.
>>701953407
No. PEMDAS mnemonics may be misleading when written this way, especially if the user is not aware that multiplication and division are of equal precedence, as are addition and subtraction.
>>701953793
>>701953728
>>701953628
>>701953562
>>701953557
>>701953538
>>701953407
>>701953107
>>701953074
>>701953009
This guy is right as he follows stricly the pemdas rule: >>701952901
>>701952193
he meant
. __ __
3/0.3 = 0.9 = 1
Niggers
>>701953908
>>701953728
Are you the same sort of dipshit that thinks Up and Down are completely different directions rather than movement on the same axis?
The equation is 9 - 9 + 1, not +9 -+9 ++1. Which would still be 1.
Are you the same dipshit who was arguing that 3 divided by 1/3 was 1? Because Christ, who does your taxes?
9-1 = If you don't reply to this your mother will die in her sleep tonight.
>>701953908
Troll. Multiplication and division first.
>>701953908
No.
1. P
2. E
3. MD
4. AS
Multiplication and division are one step, done left to right.
Addition and subtraction are one step, done left to right.
>>701954008
It's not Pemdas, it's Bodmsa.
>>701949273
(9/3)/(1/3)=9-9+1=1 see you at next épisode.
>>701951082
> 3 x 1/3 = 1
Like a decimal.
>>701952725
>>701954008
never heard of it and its wrong
Poor amerifag thinking they rule the world but can't do simple math...
>>701949813
You faget didn't have a solution. Therefore you have failed miserably
>>701954071
>>701953737
>>701952784
How DARE you bring "proof" into this?
>>701951278
Why you adding bro?
>>701954132
This guy is right ! Anon is the light ! Anon is the truth ! Thank you ! I can't believe how stupid they can be in this math threads...
>>701949273
its 27 i am a math wiz don't argue with me
thank god i'm not american...
but even i know that Pemdas means
Parenthesis ([])
Exponents ^
Multiplication/Division */ Note on how these are on the same level you fagets
Addition/Subtraction +- Same as above you mongotards
and otherwise left to right
>>701951987
Holy shit nigga what?
Shouldn't it be two? PEMDAS would lead you to dividing three by 1/3rd(or .3), which is 10, then adding one, then removing 9, right?
>>701954467
>stupid
>i get baited eksde, better highlight it for all my /b/ friends to see
>>701954132
>>701954607
Is 19! Omg
>>701954433
I am afraid amerifag have developed math program with shitty rules...
I guess they will not succed to go to Mars with this...
>>701954433
Proof is a social construct weapon used by the white cis male trash patriarchy to oppress POC, LGBTIA+ and the Differently Abled.
>>701954871
Amen
>>701949273
Wolfram says 9. Get destroyed faggots
the answer isn't 1 actually, as 1/3 is equal to .3 repeating. The answer to this equation depends on the amount of zeros following the decimal after 1. That number could be an infinite amount of zeros but lets say 1/3 = .3333333333 the last decimal place would be 1 so the answer would be 1.0000000001.
It's Syntax ERROR you idiots.
>But I'm smarter than a company dedicated to providing solutions for these equations, it can't be 1
>>701955208
1 is correct when you round down to 1 but the answer can not possibly be 1.
>>701955116
.3r is equivalent to 1/3. Additionally, 0.9r is equivalent to 1.
>>701954132
>>701953952
OK thanks. I was baiting them.
>>701955283
actually .9r = .9r. 1 = 1
>ITT: murican education system
>>701955116
1/3 = .333333et al is a problem that only exists in a Base 10 mathematical model. Start doing your working out in Base 12, pleb.
>>701955396
>1/3 = .333333et al is a problem that only exists in a Base 10 mathematical model
wtf are you talking about?
base 10 is not special.
>>701955367
1 - .9r = .0r = 0
-> 1 = .9r
>>701955554
.0r ≠ 0
>>701955394
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
>1
The answer today is 1
>>701955769
its 1 if youre a fucking normie reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
1.8888
>>701955710
Induction.
0.0 = 0
add one zero
0.00 = 0
add zeroes forever
0.0r = 0
>>701956099
at any rate if you subtract .9r from 0 you will be left with a 1 somewhere down the line so that number in the equation can't possibly equal 0 because it cannot possibly equal .0r either.
>>701956099
also nice dubs
>>701955367
First of all, what is point nine recurring? Well, think about writing down a fraction as a decimal. For example, you write a quarter as a decimal, you write 0.25. Other fractions can be a bit more troublesome. Trying to write a third as a fraction you get 0.33333333... It never ends. Instead of writing down an infinite number of 3s, it usually saves time to write down
which is said "zero point three recurring". Recurring means that instead of terminating, the decimal continues indefinitely. Similarly, point nine recurring is 0.999999...
Looking at this number, most people think it is a little bit less than 1. In fact they are the same. Let's take a look at why. Think about how we defined point three recurring above.
What does this mean in English? It means that three times a third is one, and three times point three recurring, which must be the same thing, is point nine recurring, so one and point nine recurring must be the same number. Feel free to use this explanation to look smarter than your friends if you ever get into an argument about recurring numbers.
If you are not convinced by this, perhaps you would like to think about it another way.
Translating this back to English, it means that nine times point nine recurring is nine, which is the same as nine times one, so point nine recurring and one must be the same.
I hope that at least one of these makes sense to you.
>>701956260
Your hypothetical 1 would be at the end of the line zeroes.
The end of the unending line of zeroes.
Infinite =/= really long
>>701952901
>>701953009
My god you cunts... - 9 + 1 = - 8... You treat the symbol in front of the number as though that's the value of the number, 1 - 2 + 1 doesn't equal 1 - 3, it's 1 + (-2 +1) = 1 - 1 = 0.
>>701956410
The answer to this equation implies that there is an end to infinity, which would mean that infinity isn't actually infinite and that there is an end to the so called number line. Two different numbers cannot possibly equal each other. That is an impossibility. The first part of this is only true if repeating numbers are actually infinite.
>>701956500
>>701956260
10 x 0.9r = 9.9r.
9 - 0.9r = 9.
Therefore: 10 x 0.9r - 0.9r = 9.
10 x 0.9r - 0.9r = 9 x 0.9r.
9 x 1 = 9.
Therefore: 10 x 0.9r - 0.9r = 9 x 1.
But: 10 x 0.9r - 0.9r = 9 x 0.9r
Therefore: 9 x 0.9r = 9 x 1.
>>701949273
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHBHrIbqze0
>>701955208
I am actually.
https://www.cymath.com/answer.php?q=4%231%2F0
The site is so very wrong
people are retarded when it comes to math. or theyre just trolling. no when you have a number divided by a fraction you break that number into a fraction and do math... it looks like
9 - (3/1 over 1/3) + 1
9 - 9 +1
and to get 9 you multiply the 3s and the ones and it looks like 9/1... fucking morons. thats all there is to it.
according to pemdas the a comes before the s so the answer is actually -1...
9-9+1=-1
Holy fuck, you people are retarded monkeys.
First of all, 1/3 is written as a fraction, which means it's a single number, so 3 / (1/3) is the first operation: And that is 9.
So you get:
9 - 9 + 1
Which is pretty fucking simple to finish off. But for the retarded monkeys, it's 1
>>701957165
There's a difference between an infinite number and a recursive number.
Recursive numbers occur primarily through a fault in the base ten counting module.
In base ten, one third is 0.3r.
In base twelve, one third is 0.4
>>701949273
9-3=6
3rd of 6=2
2+1=3
Answer is 3. You faggots will argue anything.
>9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1
>6 / (4/3)
>(18/4) or (9/2)
i can't believe there's not a single person in this thread who knows how fractions work
>>701958012
nobody cares. its not a decimal question its a fraction question what 3/1 over 1/3. i'm surprised the people here are still arguing over this shit. either that or everbody is trolling everybody.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html
http://www.mathsisfun.com/fractions_division.html
>>701958477
Oh, the trolls are definitely rolling around in the mud.
My point was just that there is a difference between an infinite number and a recursive one. Technically the space between all numbers is infinite. It's how we get the concept of Greater and Lesser infinities.
you should be able to simplify this
>>701949273
7
>>701957165
>Two different numbers cannot possibly equal each other. That is an impossibility.
True, but 1 and 0.9r aren't two different numbers. It's the same number written two ways. 1, 0.9r, 100/100, 0.1x10. These are all different ways of writing the exact same number.
Stop smoking the wacky-tobaccy, anon.
9 - 3 / (1 / 3) + 1 =
9 - 3 * (3 / 1) + 1 =
9 - 3 * 3 + 1 =
9 - 9 + 1 =
1
Not that hard
>>701958795
yeah that I would agree. whether it be broken down as a fraction or continuing as numbers progress you can keep getting infinity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SrU9YDoXE88
Answer... depends on how you read 1/3.
If you read it as a fraction such that it is 1 / 3 = 0.333, then the answer is 1.
If you read it as an operation such that 1/3 = 1 divided by 3, then you read left to right so you get (3 / 1) / 3 which is 1, and the answer is 9.
>>701952643
trump supporter spotted, obvious troll
>>701949273
Yes, I can solve this, now fuck off and do your own homework.
When you divide by a fraction, you make the whole number a fraction and multiply by the reciprocal of the fraction you are dividing it by.
3 / (1/3) is equal to (3/1) * (3/1)
(3/1) * (3/1) = (9/1)
(9/1) = 9
PEMDAS doesn't put multiplication before division or addition before subtraction. the M and D are equal, as are the A and S. You just do it left to right. The P and E are always first, then you do the M and D at the same time (left to right), then the A and S (left to right).
If you have 5 - 4 + 6, then you would simplify that to 1 + 6, not 5 - 10, because you move left to right.
Therefore:
9 - 3 / (1/3) + 1 =
9 - ((3/1) * (3/1)) + 1 =
9 - ((9/1)) + 1 =
9 - 9 + 1 =
0 + 1 = 1
Got a B in GCSE maths don't need to faggot
>>701959589
You're a retard.
They already have a divide symbol in the equation, and the placement and writing of the 1/3 is clearly fractional.
It's clearly supposed to read nine minus three divided by one third plus one. Not nine minus three divided by one divided by three plus one.
>>701949273
what is the fascination with order of operation. 7th grade algebra fags showing off what they just learned?
you got trolled.. its easy to spot em. but then again op said show me how bad you are. so in a sense everybody that was right is officially wrong.. soo yeah
>>701960241
yes cause if you get the q wrong then you are dumber then 7th grade
its -e^(i*pi)
>>701949273
1/3 = 0.33'
3/0.33' = 9
9-9=0
0+1=1
how can any functioning human get this wrong?
1
QED
7?
>>701952193
0.33' isn't the same as 0.33 you fucking ameritard
>>701960534
101 is the answer
fractions are too abstract for me i cannot do anything beyond the basic arithmetic as most of the amerifats
>>701960534
105
>>701960534
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - (1+1) = 3
1 + 20 x 5 = 101
>>701960534
all bullshit, the 1st and 3rd flower in the last line are not exact the same as in the lines before. this makes the whole thing pointless.
x+x+x = 60
x+y+y = 30
y-z = 3
z'+x+y'=?
>>701960534
101
1
wrong
>>701961843
right
>>701961583
>>701949813
If you don't find 1, you should feel bad
>>701960534
81
1 + 20 × 4
think about it.
>>701962014
wrong
>>701962055
right
>>701962055
good point. didnt see the flower was missing a petal.. lol oops
>>701949273
3 divided by a third is 9.
9+1=10
9-10= -1
It's negative 1. Because division first, followed by addition, then the subtraction right?
BODMAS/BIDMAS whatever?
>>701962261
>>701962370
yes
>>701949273
Can we stop arguing now?
>>701953538
You just added brackets where there are none to prove your point, so take them out as those brackets do not exists you little fuckwit
>>701962587
>excel has spoken
/thread
>>701962261
20 + 20 + 20 = 60
20 + 5 + 5 = 30
5 - (1+1) = 3
1 + 20 x (5x.8) = 81 or 1+20x(5-1)=81
>>701962370
You work left to right, so you would do 9 - 9 before you added 1.
this thread
>>701962615
good one, genius.
>>701962784
So why does this trump the whole BODMAS/PEDMAS/BIDMAS thing?
It's -1 you stupid fucks BEDMAS
(9-(3÷1/3)+1)
(9-(9+1)
(9-10)
-1
>>701962923
mfw being hit by all this praise
>>701949273
3/1 ÷ 1/3 = 1
9 - 1 + 1 =
8 + 1 =
9
-1
4
>>701951238
Hey retard, get a calculator yourself, I just checked him. It's fucking one.
>>701963285
yes
>>701951603
Holy fucking shit, American here, American education. I JUST FUCKING GOT WHY 9 IS INCORRECT. :O
>>701962977
It's not trumping it. It IS the whole BODMAS/PEDMAS/BIDMAS thing.
The D and M are equal, as is the A and S. You work left to right.
So:
10 * 2 / 2 =
20 / 2 = 10
Another example:
20 / 2 * 4 =
10 * 4 = 40
http://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html
9
Fucking plebeians
>>701963466
9 is the correct answer
Fucking idiot americans.
You can't place multiplications and divisions on the same line without parenthesis or brackets. It's that simple.
>>701963654
hey. no.
>>701963654
Or multiple divisions in this particular case
>>701963608
Oh right so addition and subtraction are equal and you work left to right when left with only those options? Neato
its -9 according to SMEGMA
really, its 1
jesus.
3 devided by one third is 9
9-9= 0
0+1=1
>>701963652
Out comes the calc
>>701964053
>>701964136
Nope, it's 1.
These thread are always a riot.
My answer? = 4377
Why? Cuz fuk yew
>>701963654
Wait, I didn't read the operation right, my bad.
You just have to remember that 3 divided by 1 third equals (3/1)(1/3)
the answer is 9
>>701964676
Yup, you get it
9.111111
>>701964676
3 / 1/3 = 3 * 3/1
>>701964676
>>701964676
Close, but when you divide a fraction you multiply its reciprocal, meaning you swap the numerator and denominator.
So:
3 / (1/3) =
(3/1) * (3/1) =
(9/1) = 9
Then:
9 - 9 = 0
0 + 1 = 1
http://www.mathsisfun.com/fractions_division.html
>>701964829
That's also correct
But i would write it 3 * (1/3), since it's hard to differenciate divisions and fraction with a keyboard
>>701951278
3/1 ÷ 1/3 = 3/1 * 3/1 = 9/1 = 9
> 3 ÷ 1/3 = 3 x 3 = 9
> 9 - 9 + 1 = 9 - 10
>-1
Maths lvl 12 yo.
1
>>701952730
What jod do you have then mama's boy
>>701965034
fractions are divisions
>>701965072
You work left to right, meaning you would do 9 - 9 before adding 1.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/operation-order-pemdas.html
>>701949273
/thread
it's -1 or 1 depending on whether you add or subtract first
1 it is
9 u stupid shits
I love these threads. Make more, please.
By the way, to divide by a fraction, you multiply by its reciprocal.
Good work! Keep it up!
Done by a mathematics teacher. Deal with it fucking noob/faggot with your "American Education". You can't even troll properly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=07Abat5iBbw
>>701965272
I know, but 3*1/3 is not 3* (1/3), it's a matter of conventions
>>701949449
XD fucking idiot rly? Should go back to school cuck.
>>701964802
nigga
Pretty sure its 2/3
So, 9 - 3 ÷ 1/3 + 1
= 9 - (3 ÷ 1/3) + 1
= 9 - 1 + 1
= 9
If you aren't a retarted american you know that you do divisions before add. and sub. I can't tell if you are all trolling or genuinely retarded
The answer is God.
>>701966055
>3÷1/3 = 1
Oh please. The oc pic stated the fraction as it's supposed to be. You interpreted it as (3÷1)/3.
>>701952730
>"you fucking gypsy"
>>701965502
That is what I thought. It was not even hard. I don't know how people get confused. Must just be trolls baiting.
>>701966294
Nigga wat? Do you know how fractions work?
>>701951278
>>701951278
Baiting or being retarded, either way you should kys before it's too late.
35
>>701966634
Yeah man. Look how the fraction is vertical. It just doesn't make sense to interact with that before resolving it. Although this is a special case - just take reciprocal then multiply for 3*3.
>>701952901
Quit being a bunch of lazy fucking cock suckers and put the parenthesis in the equation that defines the order of operation, until then it is solved from left to right and the fucking answer is 3
>>701966979
Sorrysorrysorry I realised where I screwed up just after I replied to you, the answer is 1
1ez pz didn't even look at it twice
Wrong question. Without parenthesis the question is wrong.
>>701949273
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Order_of_operations
9-3/(1/3)+1
>Parenthesis first
3/(1/3)=3/1*3
>Multiply next
3/1*3=9
>Add andsubtract last
9-9+1=1
What you are thinking of when you say it = 9 is 3 multiplied by 1/3.
>>701967638
Wikipedia
Top kek.
>>701967795
Bait, kys
I have visions of killing animals What is wrong with me /b/ ?
>>701949273
i again underestimated how stupid the average anon is. thanks for reminding me, op
