I don't know what OP means by "alt-right". It simply means conservatives who oppose and stand for more than (and are therefore rejected by) their uniparty/RINO counterpart in the GOP.
In any event NO ONE wh frequents /b/ should sympathize with, let alone be a "progressive"/liberal/SJW etc. The ones with any influence and organization hate you for one thing. Liberals really dont understand the uniqueness or importance of the constitution or why freedom-loving Americans value their free speech and guns. You don't have to be a liberal to not be a bigot. And lastly they are so easily co-opted into being the front line attack dogs for ALL NEO agendas and policies. They not only are programmed to want their own destruction and demise, they actively fight for it. Sure there are some racists and other retarded denizens of the so-called "alt-right". But by and large there has never been such a mass of people who are on the wrong side of EVERYTHING and so convinced they're smarter than everyone else than the left. The left has wrecked every country it has touched while selling it as a "liberation". Whereas globalists and imperialists have posed as both liberals and conservatives, it is the "revolutionaries" on the left, at the botyom of the pyramid who have done more to bring about genocide, oppression and starvation wherever it goes.
>>701732456 You bigoted closed minded attitude towards liberals is hypocritical. You pretend that all liberals are SJW hippies just like the SJW hippies pretend all conservatives are KKK religious fundies. You are what you hate, just on the opposite end of the spectrum.
>>701732456 The simplest political spectrum you could draw would have five groups. The emotional left, the logical left, the middle, the logical right, and the emotional right. If you think the other side consists of only one group and they're all idiots, then I'm afraid you sit in the emotional section of your respective group.
>>701733484 The problem is that people think and talk in terms of left/right TEAMS rather than specific ideologies, which vary greatly. When we oversimplify and just choose to see everyone uses a different label as "them", we fall into the pit of willful ignorance that is tribalism.
>>701733909 Bingo man. Thats exactly what I'm talking about. They are easily co-opted attack dogs for the NWO who promote every soul, economic and culture-killing agenda there is. Climategate ring any bells?
>>701733484 You're talking about classical liberals. Those are made up of non-partisan republicans, non-partisan democrats, and everyone else capable of independent thought.
Pretty sure OP means "libbbral" in the Fox News/Mainstream Media/Rush Limburger/Bill Oreilly sense, of anyone not radical far right, aka evil, aka satanism, aka faggots n niggers n jews n those damn godless scientists, aka who everything wrong with muhmurrica can neatly be blamed on.
>>701732315 not stupid just pussies. had a life of ease that nothing was more than a tantrum away from their grasp. and they are so weak and ineffectual that rather than dealing with the actual problems they invent shit that they can fight for and appear heroic even though their struggle is self created and meaningless and impossible to overcome (cause if they did well they wouldn't have anything to bitch about anymore)
The left is for the most part made up of liberal (((intellectuals))), whose weapons have been mockery allied to sentimental guilt about their prosperous and comfortable lives- and whose aim has been to liberate themselves from personally irksome moral constraints, without regard to the consequences for those less favourably placed in society, whose self-damaging behaviours the left encourages with an enormous amount selfish glee.
I don't know, Liberals build everything, absolutely everything and conservatives are afraid of all of it. But liberals fuck up a lot because they do things, conservatives do nothing and contribute nothing. So liberals can be reckless and do stupid things, but conservatives can't because they do nothing.
I would surround myself with well-intentioned doers that make mistakes long before I would surrender to despair and join the cowards of conservatism that fear everything and do nothing.
>>701739083 If Trump doesn't win, bad things WILL happen. They still might if he wins, but total cultural oblivion is guaranteed if Hillary wins.
They are viciously trying to destroy the one, *admittedly unlikely* person who stands between them and full-spectrum chaos, violence, disease and global technocracy. The people they hate, spit on, malign, and even physically attack are actually saving the world right now and they have no fuckin idea. They can thank us later I guess.
>>701740468 If the SJW "progressive" leftists get their way, you likely would be the first one targeted by the chimps when they decide they don't like whitey anymore and with the reduced penalties because of racial circumstances and slaps on the wrist they get, yeah.. You're fucked.
LOL. No conservative president, whites get murdered. It all makes perfect sense. I'd say it's a slippery slope, but your almost suggesting that if you stop drinking soda you'll grow a tail and turn a vampire. Or worse, Rush Limbaugh
>>701741267 >Trump2015 Migrants can get fucked >Trump2016-Feb Migrants can get fucked, build a wall >Trump2016-Aug Well some migrants can get fucked, but fuck the middle east, we'll have a test or something to see who's bad. >Trump as President
>>701741617 >policies are changed in accordance to "systematic oppression and white privilege" to reduce penalties for crimes committed by niggers, because it "ain't dey fault, dey gud bois and dindu nuffin" >murders against whites are heavily biased in courts, giving light sentences because of past oppression and white abuses of power It honestly doesn't matter who wins, chimps gonna chimp. Just under conservative leadership the prisons will stay stocked, while under leftist leadership they will be cleared out initially, until they start ramping up the authoritarian statist policies and the same niggers who they let out are back in for even more stupid shit.
>>701732315 they think everyone deserves to be helped and will destroy everything else to do so if you had utopia and a group of people showed up and openly stated they hate you and will destroy everything you've built they would let them in to try and make them happy knowing that they would only be happy when everyone else isn't then think by showing they are willing to let them destroy it will magically make them not want to oh you are ok with us destroying your culture? well now i don't feel like it so lets all get along. that is what they believe when it comes down to the basics and that's why every fall of great civilizations have been because they had power and no one stopped them
Our economy would be crippled without immigrants, legal or not. Get a fucking clue. The immigration debate only exists to keep you racists, inbred, fat fucking rednecks occupied while he sells the country to Russia.
>>701742681 I'm not. Republican Congress will stymie anything she proposes just out of obstinance, until they can get a Democrat majority, and then I will ignore their bullshit policies like I did under Obama's and every prior administration both Republican and Democrat. I prefer an ineffective, useless government that is fighting among themselves to get anything done.
there are idiots in all sides of politics. Many of them think that by making a law will prevent crime (Guns for Liberals and drugs for conservatives) which is against all logic, making something illegal will create more crime not reduce it, because last time I checked criminals don't give a shit about laws where theres a deman there will always be a supply, regardless of legality
>>701744017 Hillary; - Capable of public speaking without pissing off the world - Actually knows about foreign policy and how to apply it -Actually has experience doing things other than poorly investing - Is still a dumb cunt, just less of one than Trump
I can't even watch these Clinton tv adverts. I change the channel immediately. I'd like to see some stats on how often this occurs. Seeing that bitch's face is like cardboard scraping against cardboard to me.
>>701739880 We heard the same shit when Obama got elected. I am personally in much better shape 8 years down the road. Salary increased about 40%. Taxes did not raise for me. Flipped two houses. Have never met a single terrorist. I am absolutely wallowing in white privelege.
>>701745992 Please explain how "Liberals" constitutes a tribe. I'm confused, isn't liberalism an ideology shared by many different people from various walks of life races ethnicities and religions? If someone said "aren't communists/nazis/conservatives/christians stupid" would you also call them out on their "tribalism"? Seriously tho, would like to know
>>701743618 Sorry, but that's a Liberal cliche. Conservatives actually give way more to charity than Liberals, in every income bracket. But in truth it's more correct to say that liberals are driven by "justice" (in broad terms) and Conservatives are driven by freedom and liberty.
The sad thing is, Liberals don't realize that interpreting issues and events through the lens of freedom and liberty subsumes justice whereas subjetive and moving concepts of "justice" based largely on identity politics and heavily policed thought and speech harms freedom and liberty and actually causes a great deal of collateral INjustice.
>>701745880 Ahmed Huber was born in 1927. He was too young to be his "friend" and spent majority of his youth in Switzerland. Also, there is no empirical evidence that Hitler praised Muhammad or respected Islam. So, go fuck yourself back to sleep, you ignorant shithead.
>>701748499 Again, if you racist-cracker-ass retards actually read what you're shitposting, you will learn that Hitler only sided with the Mufti of Jerusalem because they shared some of the same values, i.e. hatred for the Jews. Enemy of my enemy is my friend? History is clear on the fact that the Middle East was next on his list. So, go fuck yourself back to sleep, you ignorant shithead.
>>701748728 In business regulation is seen as a cost, usually called compliance costs, which is the money spent on lawyers to get through all the red tape and make sure operations are squeaky clean. Big businesses dont pay tax, because they base themselves in Ireland or avoid it through good accounting.
Compliance costs don't scale linearly with business size and in fact get much smaller relative to revenues as a business gets larger, because of this compliance costs help large established firms maintain market share as their unit costs will be below the unit costs of smaller upstart firms trying to compete. The taxes levied on businesses also don't scale with revenue as large companies can hire good accountants or move headquarters to Ireland/Switzerland etc if possible. Big business likes regulation (for the most part) while small businesses hate it. Most regulations have no impact on consumers. This is why for example the European Union has hundreds of thousands of pages of regulations on the growing and processing of cabbages.
TL;DR Regulation and taxes are a gain for large established firms and hurt their would be competitors who are still in growth stages.
>>701747557 Actually the Bush admin was controlled by Neocons who were originally Trotskyites but went undercover into the GOP when Black Power operators started getting control of the Democrat party. Sounds made up, but it's not.
Trump's not Hitler by a long shot. He's not evil, I disagree with him, think his political aspirations are misguided, and he caters (or at least dog whistles) to people that say 'nigger' a lot.
Its politically effective to call him a racist plain and simple, and he does a pretty great job of getting baited into that corner. He says some off color things, and the democrat political machine takes advantage of it and pushes the argument in the opposite direction.
If Hillary says something off color you can guarantee the conservative political machine will hop on it i.e. all those senate hearings.
>>701732315 Stupid enough to pretentiously lord over minorities and those they believe to be intellectually inferior to them by virtue of their background while simultaneously advocating for childlike laws that do nothing but hinder the groups they claim to care for.
>>701749772 Have it your way bro. But you're the one who projected "jew" onto that list of Liberals I rattled off. Not me. It didn't even cross my mind. But the list still holds. You sound young though. You still have time to wake up.
>>701750240 Yup! I will have a nice wife and a big house and a fulfilling career because i have a 4.0 GPA and am going to a great college someday....sucks to be you bro, being 45 and still living in your mom's basement scratching your butt!! lol
>>701749132 What? They didnt. The inheritors/resythesizers of Malthusianism and Communism are the "Progressives" and Liberals. I guess I only said "they" in reference to Liberals, so you couldnt piece together my thought. My bad.
I met a guy once. He was pretty much everything you were describing. He never wanted for much as his parents were loaded. He sure wasn't humble. He was also pretty bratty. The thing is, he was also a pretty big conservative.
My point is that there are idiots on both sides of the aisle. You can poke holes in the other sides arguments all day, and you wouldn't be completely wrong, but you also wouldn't be completely right. Why? Because we are talking about idealism at its finest. What liberals and conservatives fight over is two sides of the same coin. You can call it "common sense" or you can call it "hopes and dreams." Both sides use this type of rhetoric for the other.
However, generalizing either side as an idealistic whole is moronic. We aren't hive minds, and we all don't share the same opinion. And this goes mainly towards your "self-created struggles." Just because you don't find a certain area to be a problem doesn't mean someone else feels the same. Similarly, just because you find something to be a problem doesn't make it one.
>>701750753 Erm, ok. I'm 31 (which is getting up there, I admit), have a nice wife, a masters degree, a pimp house, $ and a bunch of talent to boot. Plus I know what I'm talking about and did when I was young too. But as I say, there's still time for you,
>>701752193 don't be sad kiddo >dubs check >more inc https://youtu.be/-RO0L6WLGWM https://youtu.be/qmsyql30Kak >full video of these niggers demands https://youtu.be/fg0rTlq0u7A https://youtu.be/tq_MZEECq68
>>701752595 How is having a 4.0 GOA and being in the top 5% of my class in a world class school system in a major metropolitan area in the world's richest country an "accomplishment in the future"?
Also, way to bow out without giving me a field for your non-existant MA degree. My older brother is a doctoral candidate at UCLA and i can tell you are not very educated, people who have obtained that level of education have better things to do than hang out with Channers! (StaxExchange anyone?)
i remember somewhere in the bible where a true prophet allowed his daughters to be raped in order to save angels. another true prophet gets drunk and fucks his own daughters. yeah, you believe in that all you want.
"Among eastern religions, Hitler described religious leaders such as "Confucius, Buddha, and Mohammed" as providers of "spiritual sustenance". In this context, Hitler's connection to Mohammad Amin al-Husseini, who served the Mufti of Jerusalem until 1937 — which included asylum in 1941, the honorary rank of an SS Major-General, and a "respected racial genealogy" — has been interpreted by some as more of a sign of respect than political expedience."
>>701753556 Politifact has rated him correct 98% of the time, more than any other prominant political commentator
Also, Patriot Supply is a great sponsor for his show, their "Survival Food Bank" will really help in the event of total societal collapse (which Glenn predicts within 10 years and of course will happen because he predicted the Great Recession, Obama, Trump, Russian Invasion of Ukraine ect...)
>>701753982 And that, 4chan, is an example of what we call "Confirmation Bias"
Confirmation Bias can make an otherwise rational human being believe that a Neo-Pagan Occultist who spent an entire chapter in his Auto-Biography lambasting Christianity (And whose Neitschean underpinnings further reinforce this) is actually a "Christian" just to protect his fragile Ego from the realization that Hitler identified far more with Islam than the faith native to his country, which he felt "weakened" the natural German will to power and crippled them during WW1
>>701755080 If you two are done kicking each others dicks, I'd like sauce on that gif.
And >>701755351 you're full of shit. You labored for like 10 minutes on that pile of shit of a sentence. It really is one of the most terrible sentences I've ever read and you should feel bad about that.
>>701751797 Not really, Reducing regulations on a business that is using them to stifle competition will force them to stifle competition by providing better services or reducing prices, We saw that in Ireland when during the 90's regulations on things like airlines were pretty much abolished and prices fell to maybe 15% of what they were, more for short busy flights (like those between the UK and Ireland)
Taxes are another story, countries like the US need to curb tax havens and tax evasion which Obama has done in the last 2 years to an extent (banks are required to ask people in Europe if they are American citizens due to the huge amount of tax that was evaded by Americans working in the EU and Switzerland) but the only alternative would be to reduce Corporate taxes in the US which it cannot afford to do. The USA cannot go an force a NATO nation to change its tax laws or any nation really.
Its a bit of a catch 22, overall though reduction in regulation in most industries would be a huge gain for consumers and small businesses. Some industries, like Pharmaceuticals, lend themselves to mega-companies because one drug is enough to turn any startup into a billion dollar drug company and there is effectively no way to stifle competition any more in that industry considering the current patent system. There are others too, these are the companies where regulation is welcome, regulation is not needed at its current levels for things like opening an online retailer or an Airline, regulation on things like food processing in Europe is much too high too which I imagine is true in the US too (FDA, EPA etc). Not to mind things like agri-chemical production. The most valuable thing venture capital firms give to technology startups is their expertise on navigating regulations.
>>701756426 Thank you kind anon. I shall further thank you in the same writing style as this eight pound water head mongoloid retard >>701754897
Ahem. The sauce you have provided me warms the deepest burrows of my icy heart. I had but given up on the kindness of my brethren but you have reinstated my faith in all of humankind by liberally providing the delicious sauce that has slaked my thirst for knowledge. With said knowledge, I can now query the internet and attain a nude daguerreotype of this delectable flapper and flog my genitalia until it is most bruised and swollen.
>>701757194 Why do you persist in unnecessarily capitalizing words? It seems to me that you are suffering from some sort of developmental disability such as Brain Pudding or Bungle Fever. Your vastly roomy cranium is stretching the boundaries of its capability and the strain is starting to show. Your punctuation suffers! Your grammar meanders! Your exclamations have become excremental, surely death is at your door!
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.