It's not beautiful. No relationships are beautiful. We're all just experiencing a painful cosmic mishap, and the human species is just counting the days before the sun goes out. None of this thing we call life is full of any beauty or wonder. We're all just trying to get by and maybe do some drugs in the process.
>>701667695 interracial relationships aren't beautiful, you're racist for thinking its something special and unique, its simply two people in a relationship, they aren't fucking dinosaurs or something.
>>701667695 nothing against it, it's not beautiful either. the only problem i have with its how its portrait it in the media, its always a black guy and a white girl. i haven't see in a while a pair of asian/white, latino/white or anything else, it's always black and white, i think the last time i saw a native american/white woman was with Dr. Quinn. srly the are really pushing an agenda of only black dudes and white girls
Interconnected world means fixed races are doomed. It doesn't matter if you like it or not, it will still happen. I don't really care, girl I am dating is mixed like a cocktail and I'm bread and butter white - whatever.
>>701667695 OP. I'm not trying to tear down your worldview here or anything but you really need to try and think past the bullshit your high school and college professors told you. The truth lies somewhere in between the two extremes, but the first step is to realize what they taught you in school was definitely an extreme.
>>701667695 there is nothing wrong with in any sense. in the human en devour one of the most common desires is to find the romantic conception of love. we all want someone else to share ourselves with and if that person happens to be another race who cares. from the point of eugenics we are fucked anyway. our immune systems rely heavily on antibiotics and inoculations, we need to have so many faulty genes floating out there right now from years of free breeding that even if we did start on the colonizing bred humans it would take hundreds of generations to remove defective genes then hundreds more to naturally expand and globalize these colonies on super humans. either accept it or commit a hate crime. idc.
People who would be considered "white" will account for only 10% of the world population by 2060. It is something to be preserved. I love being white and the beauty of my people. I want it to live on. There is nothing racist about that.
Nothing wrong with it, it's actually good for the genepool, the bigger the genetic differences in the parents, the healthier the offspring will be. I'm always happy to see a not so attractive fat white chick date a black guy. I sometimes catch myself thinking "what a dumb whore" when she's hot, not sure why... sometimes it's totally different, when I see two black people with a black child I think why didn't they both go for white partners?
But I digress look at birth rates interracial children have not gone up exponentially. People still tend to stick with their own race, or something close to it. This is not racism it's biological attraction. Stop parrotingthe bullshit your sjw professors crammed down your throat.
You can say it all you want but it won't make it true. You're failing to differentiate morals and what is empirical, you're fucking Mortals will not change facts no matter how much you wish them to. This is literally philosophical deduction entry level shit.
Your bullshit views will weeken and maybe hopefully you'll become a contributing member to society when you grow up.
The point of sexual reproduction is to achieve diversity. To have a large gene pool so that the individuals are different to each other, thus reducing the risk of the entire species dying from a single virus etc.
If making babies with people different from yourself was "unnatural" we would use sexless reproduction and just clone ourselves.
>>701669617 Until there's so much interbreeding that the gene pool becomes equally distributed and we run out of unique genetic material. Granted humans won't be around long enough for that to happen, but say we get lucky, it's a real risk.
Violent temper. Ignorant views. Apathetic towards destructive consumerism. Apathetic towards the fact that he pays taxes and it doesn't go towards his community or even clean drinking water. Listens to new country and thinks it's great. Listens to Rush Limbaugh and other pundits like it's gospel. Swears in front of his kids. Very religious, but cherry picks the rules he follows.
Oh yeah I've met these people. Unbearable. Not white people. Just this variant.
>>701669777 Interracial breeding doesn't mean you get a set blend of the two races. What genes transfer to each individual is determined by chance. Hence, I would think that (long-term) interracial breeding would result in a population with more possible genetical combinations, rather than a population where everyone has the same "half-black half-white" genes.
>>701669325 Yes, otherwise we coulden't live in the north because of the sun(lack of sun). Bur different amount of pigment does not mean different race. Its evolution, the Blacks dies when They went North and the whites would die in Africa. Its like the jamaican is fast runners because the weak slaves died in the boat to Jamaica. Evolution is beautiful
>>701667695 What kind of seems a shame to slowly remove all the different societies that have developed around the world to lose the diversity that we already have but I guess it's also an inevitability with the ease of travel
>>701668511 You know I've had the same thought,for different reasons. There are three interacial couples on my street, all are white man / black women. This seems far more prevalent to me than the other way around.
The arguments against it are all weak appeals to emotion. Human beings are one species in the sense that we make viable offspring with each other. Certain proteins involved in the immune system called MHC's (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_histocompatibility_complex) provide a stronger immunity when the component of the father's DNA and the component of the mother's DNA in a child encode a different MHC.
You're currently seeing the effects of small populations who strive for "purity" in places like Saudi Arabia, where pretty much everybody has die of beetus and a bunch of hereditary diseases because of inbreeding.
The superficial differences are just a way for retards to distinguish their in-group from out-groups and give the illusion of belonging to one ethnicity, while we're genetically all human.
Weak sauce genetic traits like the lack of alcohol dehydrogenase and lactose intolerance (lactase deficiency) in asians or sickle cell anemia in africans can be fixed if they breed with superior white genes.
>>701674350 While there is no good justification for the retention of 'purity' many arguments against interbreeding stipulate similarity between populations.
There are significant statistical differences between various populations, interbreeding reduces those. So interbreeding between a high iq and low iq race create a person in between. This is good for the low iq participant and bad for the high iq participant.
Additionally, significant interbreeding actually reduces biodiversity, which will reduce the survivability of the entire species in the event of disaster or plague.
all in all, interbreeding is bad in excess, but limited interbreeding is actually good for various populations.
>using (((wikipedia))) as a source on political topics.
>>701667695 Several studies have showed that biracial kids tend to suffer more psychological problems, pointing to a correlation. Be it genetical or enviromental factor (biracial kids get a lot more shit than others from the rest of the kids), this is a fact. Having a biracial kid is deliberately putting extra shit on his/her plate. Other medical journals have described how biracial genomes tend to present infrequent combinations of genes, with several interactions; which can be good or bad, but statistically, also tend to screw the kid. Though this hypothesis sound racist, note how the human evolved initially in clan-based structure where first cousin coupling were usual, thus most of the human subgroup kept gene sets that were good working with very similar gene sets.
You can have your whatever-fever you wish, but having kids outside your race generally implies increased chances of screwing them.
>>701667878 Your pseudoscience and plesse understand i used the word pseudo, is based out of non factual arguments. If you can prove it go ahead show your work. But when you come upon genetic diversity which you will and it shatters your world you'll inderstabd why mixed ethnicity children are the future of humankind.
>>701667695 Its not beautiful, that is arguably the one thing wrong with it. My issue is that most blacks and jews have very ugly features and need to evolve thier own beauty before they can copulate or even cohabitate with our beautiful people. Unfortunately too many americans can't think straight and the water is already getting too muddy. Asian mixes can make for beauty but not always, gotta be selective.
you either fuck your cousin or there is disease and sicklyness abundant in your family. I am so mixed i can hardly count, my bones heal in werks as opposed to months i havent had a cold or gone to the doctor in 5 years and im 6' flat.
White people have this obsession with genetic purity that borders on the chinese mentality of the fragile and frail arent the working class therefore superior except only looking at colour...but then die at 50. Your bodies are genrtically weak. Do your grandkids a favour mix them
note how the human evolved initially in clan-based structure where first cousin coupling were usual, thus most of the human subgroup kept gene sets that were good working with very similar gene sets.
However, (and this is very important), there were also couplings to memebers outside of the the 'clan', which introduced novel genetics into the group. Gene flow is very important to keeping a population robust because otherwise, inbreeding results in smaller genetic diversity for the population and thus exposes it to greater chances of extinction (ie: a greater resistance to a certain disease or poison would be absent and the population's chances of remaining extant would lessen). For examples of inbreeding resulting in worse vitality, look no further than hasidic jews, who only intermarry with other hasidic jews and who suffer from much higher rates of genetic disorders because the inbreeding had become so severe.
In a hundred years or so I feel like the white race will be gone forever and we're all going to be a shade of fucking grey. I'm proud of my pale skin, light hair and blue eyes and will only breed and marry with the same.
>>701676480 >>oh gowd my sciatica >>my hypochodria >>my wallet >>you want how much for a perscription?
Yeah seems right. Adding to this look at the make uo of hesidic jews. A majority of them all look alike Fucked up teeth Rotund Short Poor eyesight Excessive body hair Skin conditions Poor bone structure Respiratory problemss Digestive issues Cranial structure
literally the charicature of the jew guy guy is a hesidic jew stereotype of an inbred monster.
>>701676789 Right but why are you proud... All of your traits you just mentioned are genetic mutations. Sorry to say but white people came last. Not even as an insult just as a fact all of the things your proud of ehere caused through inbreeding and are the result of weak genetic diversity. Again these are just facts the mutations just so happened to work out aesthetically so you look good but your blue eyes are more sensitive to light and less adept at seeing at night, your skin is less likely to protect you from the sun and elements. Your body is more fragile and likely to get sick if youre tall chances are your bones are weaker and will be less likely to hold you up or even give out in your old age. Your bodies are not meant to last.
> So interbreeding between a high iq and low iq race create a person in between.
Even assuming that IQ is entirely genetic, no. It doesn't work like that. Assuming it is genetic, a high IQ and a low IQ person's offspring could be anywhere along the spectrum depending on how the genes interact. It is entirely possible for the high IQ genes to be completely dominant and thus most of the offspring would possess high IQ, or the opposite if the reverse is true. If shared dominance is occuring, then yes, some offspring would posses middling IQ, but there would still be very high IQ offspring and very low IQ offspring and plenty in between depending on how many genes are responsible for IQ.
>Additionally, significant interbreeding actually reduces biodiversity, which will reduce the survivability of the entire species in the event of disaster or plague.
No, nigger. That's not how that works. What you said makes no sense to anyone who has studied evolution for even a month. Read a book, not wikipedia, goddamn.
>>701667695 The Jews are trying to eradicate the whites by subconsciously putting interracial relations in all the media, with enough mix breeding our race will be no more, there are even quotes by Jews saying that's their plan
>>701667695 >>701678069 The Jews are trying to eradicate the blackes by subconsciously putting interracial relations in all the media, with enough mix breeding our race will be no more, there are even quotes by Jews saying that's their plan
You do realize that saying that those features came about solely due to inbreeding is incredibly fucking retarded, right? Those features came about because they were more advantageous to those people's survival in their environment. Also, weak genetic diversity requires a stop in gene flow which never occurred.
>blue eyes are more sensitive to light >and less adept at seeing at night
Also this makes no sense. How can a greater sensitivity to light make one less adept at seeing in the dark when seeing in the dark is all about being sensitive to the little light that is present.
>>701667695 I married an Asian woman. I did so not because of any fetish but because she was the only girlfriend I ever had out of several that actually cared about having a family. Every fucking white girl I dated was "maybe when I'm 35" or something similar when it came to having kids.
>>701667695 I have no problem with interracial relationships, per se. The idea of two people being free to associate with and love whomever they choose is a basic freedom I support.
However, the social and cultural portrayal of interracial relationships today is that they are inherently superior or that intraracial relationships are somehow inferior. This is what I take issue with: the bullshit political agenda attached to it.
One isn't better or worse than the other. They're both equal, they're just different. Those who would seek to uphold one above the other automatically lower themselves and the beliefs they support. They are bigots and racists.
Let me be very clear: if you think interracial relationships are superior, you're a bigoted racist.
There seems to be a concerted effort to constantly drone about the "superiority" of blacks and minorities. You see it constantly on /b/: BBC threads, "you mad, white boi?" threads, blacked.com threads. I get the shits of it. It's racist, it's bigoted, and quite frankly, it seeds hatred and makes little of itself.
So if I don't support interracial relationships, it's because they're not genuine, they have a political agenda attached. And in practice I believe that a good portion of people who find themselves in an interracial relationship are only doing it because they've been subconsciously programmed their entire lives that it's the right thing to do. That it's the only way to be "un-racist". And that's racism, plain and simple. I refuse to be told that I'm a racist for not kowtowing to a different group of racists with a political agenda. Fuck you.
That the "social and cultural portrayal of interracial relationships today is that they are inherently super" is a fantasy you concocted. So is the "droning about the "superiority" of blacks and minorities. You've concocted an ex post facto rationalization of your irrational racist purity response to interracial relationships and minorities in such a way that you can soothe your racist conscience. But you're fooling yourself by appealing to naked falsehoods.
>>701682898 You must be new here. I take it you don't spend any fair amount of time on /b/. Or /gif/ for that matter. Likewise you probably don't spend any amount of time on social media. Either that, or you're willfully blind. There is a media effort to portray interracial relationships in a positive light. Additionally, they are over-represented.
Furthermore, it's clear you didn't read my entire post. It's right there in the beginning. I don't have any issue with interracial relationships. I have an issue with the politics that surround them. Who you love should be apolitical.
If you can't accept that, if you still think I need to embrace the politics in order to accept interracial relationships, if you think the two can't be separated, then you're the bigoted racist.
>>701683555 >You must be new here. I take it you don't spend any fair amount of time on /b/.
I spend enough time on /b/ to know the majority's opinions on niggers. It's complete and total nonsense to believe /b/ is somehow pro-minority. You're utterly foolish if you genuinely believe that. Staggeringly, aggressively ignorant.
> it's clear you didn't read my entire post. It's right there in the beginning I don't have any issue with interracial relationships.
Yes, and then you dismiss them as inauthentic because they're generated by political bias rather than love. But your opininon is based on a false rationalization. You're lying to yourself. That was the point of my post.
>There is a media effort to portray interracial relationships in a positive light.
That's not what you said in your post. You said there was a deliberate effort to portray them as superior, but there isn't. The fact that you yourself confuse the two perfectly illustrates the rationalization you're employing.
Nothing wrong with race mixing. The thing is, smart people shouldn't breed with stupid inbred retards. And sadly, a lot of niggers are just that. Some niggers however, are of normal intelligence and just good members of society. It's fine to breed with them.
You shouldn't breed with white trailer trash cousin-marrying retards either. The percentage of these morons is just higher among niggers.
tl;dr Just shoot everybody with an IQ under 100. Coincidentally, well over 50% of them will be niggers.
>>701667695 To me the only bad aspect of it is the fact that with race mixing we'll end up all looking the same. In the end everyone will look like an arab with light brown skin, dark hair and dark eyes. I find that sad, because to me light skin, blonde hair and blue eyes is just beautiful. Anything with white skin, actually. So it's an aesthetical thing to me.
>>701667878 Yes, they are quite distinct, but since they can breed with whites they are by very definition the same species. That's the one characteristic that determines if two sets of DNA are two distinct species.
>>701684191 >I spend enough time on /b/ to know the majority's opinions on niggers
Then you'll also be fully aware of the constant presence of pro-black and pro-minority threads that are clearly intended to illicit a negative emotional response.
>Yes, and then you dismiss them as inauthentic because they're generated by political bias rather than love
I never said that all interracial relationships fall into this category. I did say that there are a portion of those relationships which are encouraged due to political bias.
>You said there was a deliberate effort to portray them as superior See point number one, then go to the catalogue and find your nearest "you mad, white boi?" thread. I guarantee there's at least one.
The politicization of interracial relationships isn't imagined. Your ardent defense and insistence that such politicization doesn't exist suggests that you're either willfully ignorant or complicit. To go even further, if I could sufficiently prove it to you, I think I would then find you in support of it.
>>701668359 It obviously does. Different races have evolved differently because of the geographical locations they (and the arising necessities) they were in. If we mix together this biological diversity will be gone. That's just a fact, not even judging whether it's good or bad, it just is.
>>701685141 > then go to the catalogue and find your nearest "you mad, white boi?" thread.
That's the second time you've appealed to that example. But nigger threads and white master race threads outnumber whiteboi "I like black cock" fetish threads by thousands. If you don't acknowledge that, you're a liar.
The very fact that the thread we're in exists and hasn't died yet is evidence that people still mistrust interracial relationships. The idea that there is some unconscious endemic cultural affinity for interracial relationships is beyond stupid. Most still marry within their own race. Sure, jungle fever might be a thing, but it's not an expression of our culture's overly positive posture toward interracial relationships.
>>701667695 What the fuck. In all honesty, I get the idea of white women wanting black man (a tiny minority, of course, but they exist). They're usually tall and muscular. Some of them have really masculine faces (not the wide nosed nignog faces, you kno what I mean). They excel at sports and they have this animal flair to them. I see how that can be sexually appealing to some women. BUT WHO IN THE FUCK would be attracted to a nigress? Seriously, they all look like fucking Bill Cosby, but even darker. I'm disgusted by black women to the point that I actually physically and openly visible cringe when I see one unexpectedly in public. There's nothing feminine about them, everything is big and clunky, their hair is frizzy and all that. I just don't see it.
>>701685752 >But nigger threads and white master race threads outnumber whiteboi "I like black cock" fetish threads by thousands. If you don't acknowledge that, you're a liar. I think that 4-Chan should change the /n/ "transportation" to "nigger" threads
>>701685752 >The idea that there is some unconscious endemic cultural affinity for interracial relationships is beyond stupid.
No, of course not. There is a concerted effort to change the culture. I never said it was the accepted norm. I said there is a concerted cultural and political effort to portray interracial relationships in a positive light and to obliquely suggest that they are superior. It's a subversive counterculture.
>>701667878 >interspecies I want idiots who dont know biology to die, IF YOU HAVE A INTERSPECIES OFSPRING IT WONT BE ABLE TO REPRODUCE YOU FUCK NUGGET, THE FUCKING DEFINITION OF A SPECIES IS A GROUP OF INDIWIDUALS ABLE TO PRODUCE FERTILE OFSPRINGS
>>701685752 Go live in detroit.gett shot robbed raped by some niggers, and reincarnate as a racist. most of /b/ are not racist, becouse we only hate 99% of them. Being a racist these days is not a 'bad' thing. Becouse most of the minority's here are fucking our country. west europe u.s... look at what was one's the beautifull city of love. Paris.that became a city full of violant raping beating stealing niggers. #rip paris. rip the white race.
>>701667932 There's no way to draw the line as to distinguish one race from another. We're 99.999% when you compare any two "races". Even when you contrast the differences of two people of the same "race"; they'll show the same variance as comparing with someone on the other side of the earth.
I sympathize. I lived in Calgary and every single homeless person was a drunk-ass native. I'm not saying you should marry gang member niggers or drunk ass indians. But if you find a good one, marry away.
>>701686722 I refuse to believe that you're too stupid to understand what I'm saying based solely upon the language you use in your replies. Therefore I can only assume you're deliberately misinterpreting me in order to find footing for your opposing view.
Here's a charitable reading of what you say. You don't actually mean merely that interracial relationships are portrayed in a positive light. You mean that they're portrayed as superior. But merely portraying them in a positive light is not an oblique suggestion that they are superior. That's the nature of your confusion: you see a positively-portrayed interracial relationship on TV, and you move to the conclusion that some secret counterculture in the wings is trying to convince us interracial relationships are better. But that doesn't follow. Your jump from one to the other is a reactionary racist (probably involuntary) purity response to something utterly innocuous.
>>701688169 Actually, it's more like "I'm fine with gay people, but if you believe how the media portrays them, you'd be led to believe that 1/3 to 1/2 half of people are gay. You'd be led to believe that ALL gay people ALL the time ALWAYS embody a better sense of morality, they make better parents, they have happier relationships, etc."
One could get the notion that it's a shame they're not also gay, since being gay seems pretty great.
It's simply not true. At the end of the day they're human. And human beings are generally shit. Some are good, some are bad. Gay or not has little to do with it.
How can you convince someone who is of moral relativism that they are wrong? If you are curious, investigate these things on your own. If these things will never mean anything to you and you know that, do not bother. Race mixing = race destroying. If all race mix, separate races lose existence, the product, a mixed society of shit, has a new human condition. A new identity. One that is unattached to values of the past or history or old culture. They become destined to have their culture imposed upon them by the elites that run their society. Destined to forever believe in the degenerate cultural values that are given TO them by their Hazidic overlords. Destined to be a mob of stupid, collectivist, sexually immoral wage slaves. A mere shadow of their proud and honorable unique identities, with no respect for nationhood or self determination, most likely smug in their mixing, and desiring to force all remaining races to mix. Except Jews, who will rule over them as master and slave. That's what's wrong with race mixing as far as I'm concerned. The respectable multiculturalist, will want to preserve their own culture, to keep the world multicultural, and not monocultural.
>>701688552 It doesn't matter what they want. Australopithecus, for example, have been gone for millenia, and nobody gvies a shit, we are 10 times better off without societal parasites just human enough to fuck things up, but not quite human enough to integrate or develop society or accept advanced culture.
Most people don't have the education or context to think about it, but without niggers, society could advance in ways that would take millions of years to get some of the defective genes to catch up or wait for them to die out.
>>701677227 Every single thing that makes a human a human is the result of a genetic mutation, you tucking idiot. Mutations are the driving force behind evolution. If white people came last, that basically means they are the latest updated version of humanoid - pretty cool, actually.
If life really is meaningless (which it fucking obviously isnt) then none of you faggots would have any qualms with pulling out a pistol right now and putting a bullet in yours or literally anyone elses head
Sigh. I'll give you that gays have been caricatured too much (particularly in the 90s), but that's going away now that they've become more accepted into the wider culture. Early portrayals of interracial relationships might be guilty of that too (think of how flawlessly Sidney Poitier is portrayed in Guess Who's Coming to Dinner). But those kinds of unlikely positive caricatures are a way to get the wider suspicious culture to chill out a little in order to earn money, not to express a thesis about superiority.
The only people who want racemixing outside of some fetishist degeneracy are people who don't have family trees, or who don't understand the value of genetic heritage out of immaturity or whatever reason.
Most people don't seem to think past their singular moment of the present, let alone think about their contribution to society or even the family.
>>701689515 No, dude, evolution is specialization and adaptation. You don't get something better by mixing what's good with garbage. Evolution is refinement of what works, not introduction of faulty mechanics with the hope that it improves. It generally does not.
Evolution works best through death. Mass extinction, genocide, and apocoluptic events all seem to accelerate evolutionary development. Overpopulation and race mixing do the opposite. It's like watering down something new, good and tested that's going int he right direction with something old and stupid that's just around because it didn't get a chance to die off yet.
Pick one, you disingenuous, double-thinking fag. We can't all be equal. It's impossible. We are, objectively, each granted a unique set of DNA from our parents. it's all direct linage inheritance. There's no confusion or mistake. WE are ALL different, and nobody is equal.
A direct result of one's genetic heritage there are groups that are substantially more similar to each other than other members of the species in other geographical places, and we call these "races" or "breeds".
Nobody is equal. That's some shady legal bullshit from an uneducated past where people had not the tools we do now to understand the material reality of what we are.
The biggest mistake we made as a race was letting the mud skins into our countries and now in a couple of hundred years the aryan race will have become a thing of the past and we are to blame for that. We dungoofed guys.
>>701689327 That is stupid and wrong, all races are equally old and have continued to develop for equally long. The white race stopped developing traits that help in Africa and started developing traits (like white skin) that help in Europe. But while the white race was getting worse at living in Africa and better at living in Europe the African races continued getting better and better at surviving in Africa.
Evolution is not perfect, however, it only rewards the genes that procreate, meaning it has no long term plans. Which is why we should consider what genes to cut today.
Giving black women a dose of white sperm might or might not help with the world's problems. The best solution to race inequality problems would probably be to have all black men be cucked for a generation so fewer children grow up fatherless. While it would mean a number of men would have to have two wives it would be far superior to all the black women missing husbands. Half a husband is better than none.
>>701690654 They're worse than any other race, flat out, dude. Don't be under any illusions. And I hate to say it due to confirmational bias, but, the Asians have whites beats. They have held a stable society for longer than any other modern civilizations, and have an incredibly long and prolific history of creative invention and discovery that rivals Caucasoids easily.
But yeah, dude, niggers are too feral. It's like talking about the difference between a dingo and a housedog.
>>701690910 Well, there's also the several massive revolutions, the Second Sino-Japanese War, the millions dead by Chairman Mao, North Korea, North Vietnam, Indonesia (Horrendously evil government), and the ungodly level of exploitation and poverty that goes on there.
>>701691155 I'm talking about human hisotry, and there's no other modern civilzation that can trace its lineage farther back with written records than the Asians, and that's a fact.
Their history goes into such distant past with clear record keeping that early Western scholars simply could not believe it. While Greece and Persia were in infancy, China had already developed a culture and stable society for millennia.
Part of being the best, is aggression and the will to power, so don't let unrest mar your judgement. Just look at Ireland, ffs, a bunch of white Christians killing each other for decades, and that's fairly recently, too. Unrest and upheaval are just integral parts of societal evolution, since old organizations that don't work anymore take on a life of their own and must be uprooted, often at great cost.
>>701691389 that's really sad. I can only imagine you must still be young to act that way. Most mature individuals tend to embrace the realities of what they are, and your ancestors are direct precursors to your existence.
And you don't really know, dude, they may have very well had a great interest in ethics and law, but were farmers and fishermen because they didn't live in a society of litigation. They lived in a society of base survival.
>>701691885 I thought it was tragically hilarious that they rounded up and kicked out the whites in some places, only for the places collapsed and dilapidated within 2 years, and them literally begging for more white people to come invest.
Niggers lack coherent "Independent Agent" Theory. They see the world from their own eyes and have a lot of trouble seeing through other people's eyes or thinking too far ahead, which makes them entirely incompetent at executive functions, and why "regional warlord" is more common in Africa, than "President" or "King".
>>701691969 Civilization in general always leads to overpopulation and strife. It's the nature of life. We're still in the middle of evolving a society and the people that can work in it.
Even the earliest North American cities met the same apocalyptic fate. Inevitably, eventually the cities grow from prosperity and abundance to overpopulation and scarcity, and when the system is strained too far, it breaks and has to reshuffle itself.
The alternative would be scrapping modern society, so I don't think that's happening for centuries or another couple of millennia, unless the bombs drop or something weird.
>>701667695 Let me tell you why it's wrong, fucko. We, white people, got the fuck out of Africa 100,000s of years ago. We not only built the modern world you live in we shaped the very Earth itself to OUR needs. Niggers on the other hand built a mud hut out of straw and hyena shit yesterday in Africa. We whites ARE the superior race, fucking niggers is below 99% of us.
my girlfriends mom is ridiculously against it. we were watching TV in her kitchen and there was a cheerios commercial or some shit with an intteractial couple and she just looks at us disgustedly and asks "how are you two watching this shit?" like we fucking casted and created the commercial.
shes always bitching about there not being enough white people on TV. a commercial with that big titted spanish chick from modern family came on and shes like "this is fucking bullshit, why are all these fucking spanish people taking over everything." I don't care if shes racist but its just annoying to hear over and over. its like who really gives a shit. but its her fucking house so what am I supposed to say.
Don't hate my family. Home staying at my parents' house right now in fact. I love my immediate family, actually. I had a great childhood and early adulthood because of them. I just don't see the value in revering strangers in my family tree because we share genes.
>>701692929 I don't really give a shit when someone I don't know kills themselves or blows themselves up, either, but I don't think "Gee isn't that nice" either.
It's like anything else. Some people lack the discernment and personal perception and senses to see and appreciate the problem of breeding with niggers. Sometimes, the people are just catastrophically immature and do it to spite their family.
I can't really blame the shitskins and subhumans from wanting to breed with superior whites, but for a white to date a nigger, there's something wrong with them. Either flat out defective in some way, or hasn't matured enough to see what's going on and still living in the childlike fantasy of "equality"
>>701693276 what? the black warlords that started the slave trade had vast empires and regions of land and incredible wealth. and like all worthless niggers they choose bling (plates in mouths) over industry. can't expect a nigger to not be a nigger even in 2016.
>>701674870 Most half-black celebrities latch on to both when needed. Just look at Drake. He reps the black half in his lyrics and rapper image, yet he started his career on one of the whitest TV shows of all time Degrassi.
Take a look at all the old rappers too. They're all doing dad flicks and cop shows. Cashing in their white cred while at the same time building their careers off of the same ol' "Fuck da police" rhetoric.
Alicia Keys is only relevant BECAUSE she's half white. If she was full black, midnight black, she would never have gotten a record deal. But because she has the nice caramel skin tone with the white features, she ends up coming off as exotic instead of hood. She wishes she was hood, but has no idea how thankful she should be for being born half white, instead of looking like a hairless ape with a fat ass.
Even the brothas don't want to fuck full black women anymore.
Not rejecting it; ignoring because it has no value to me. I sounded maybe a little aggressive on the Swiss German alcoholics thing. I don't mean to deride them, but I also don't really care. I accept that there are facts about how I got here, and that those involve my ancestors, but I tend to be much more future-looking than past-looking in connection with my own life...which actually is a little odd because I'm generally fascinated by history. Just not my own, it would seem.
Truly the biggest red herring when talking about race.
"How are you going to judge two dogs as different just because the color of their fur!"
>ignoring the jaw >ignoring the skull >ignoring the eyes >ignoring the muscle ratios >ignoring the hair >ignoring the blood >ignoring the temperament >ignoring the impulsiveness >ignoring pretty much everything else but the skin/fur
"but.. but.... yeah, it's just fur!"
Yeah, it is skin, and it's ugly in black, but that's not why people hate niggers.
>>701668359 Reverting back to a earlier primitive step in evolution is not progress, it is like crossing with a chimp and celebrating the resulting diversity.
It is not bad to have less genetic variance because they had more genetic selection and specialization
Allot of the dumb and weak died of , this did not happen to africa there are almost twice as much africans. They had no selection to adapt to the unforgiving winters and harsh climates in eurasia hence they never evolved, they stayed dumb weak and have a little bit more genetic variance because less of them got selected off.
How ever african negroes do not have more genetic drift, Caucasians actually have more genetic drift and are less the same then africans are.
Just take Asians and Europeans , you cant find genetic differences that large any were like that in negroes,
Even the bush men and younger african races are more similar compared to each other then Asians and Europeans whom only separated 38,000 years ago.
Now being a young race is not a bad thing as the older are less developed and not genetically specialized you see this back in todays accomplishments.
>>701669627 Wow good arguement there sally. You just got some extra cedit towards your womyn power class whoch will go towards your degree which will go towards you gettinga job at mcdonalds where you will ultimately get pregnant with a child from the black fry cook and he will get fired for selling drugs through the drive through and leave you before the niglet pops out
>>701669233 Bullshit niggers always say this crap , whites are albino. If you know what albinos are you wouldnt say that. Further more , africans and caucausians had a common ancestor caucausians did not develop from blacks.
People were mere monkeys that recently lost their fur and did not adapted a dark pigment, they had not even left the jungle for the savannas.
It follows that whites should be left alone, since they are already genetically diverse enough, but Jews should be forced to interbreed with blacks to strengthen their gene pool with strong genes and eliminate their many recessive diseased genes.
>>701695104 not really despite what other people would tell you. as long as you don't think your skin makes you inherently better than someone else, having pride in your race/nationality is alright, I think
>>701695375 or we could just not regulate intermarriage, because why would you? Many ethnic groups that did exist no longer do, including many of the historic ones that "pro-whites" identify modern white people with.
200 years ago people would be appalled at the cultural and ethnic mixing that produced modern white people. Your opinion will be about as significant
Because black pussi is the fucking best. My black wife is literally my sex slave lmao Niggers don't want their women, they want the superior whites. That's why the mix to try to make their blood line more white. They're ashamed.
>>701695783 they would've advanced certainly but it likely wouldn't be "as advanced" as it is today. I don't think utter genocide (and the later slave labor and war needed to get america as it is today) is really worth those "advancements" by maybe that's just my bleeding heart talking. with a mutual agreement among Europeans and natives along w peaceful cultural exchanges things could've ended up similar to how they are today. that's assuming the Natives stopped killing each other to make peace w the whites
>>701696146 I get this probably isn't even your wife and is purely a fetish thing but I hope this kink of hers isn't a first reflection of her self esteem... Had an Uncle Tom-like gf in HS that had terrible elf esteem issues cuz she equated herself with the ignorant black people. also wanted to be called a nigger in bed but I wasn't down with it really
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.