You have 10 seconds to justify why guns shouldn't be banned.
Banning guns won't stop a psycho from getting one.
banning guns dont solve shit. South america have some heavy gun controls and shit but still they have some of the highest rate of crimes at gunpoint. Robbers , dicks and killers will find a way to get a ilegal gun somewhere no matter what.
>Implying the criminally insane who are apparently determined enough to find guns despite out theoretical gun regulations will be deterred by your simply owning a gun and not just murder your shit in your sleep.
If you have a fire extinguisher in the house to help put out a fire, why wouldn't you have a gun in the house to protect from a murderer or thief. Police recommend a gun for self protection because the reality is they can't instantly be at your house. Banning guns would be a detriment to the economy as sport shooting, hunting, and the nra would disappear. The places in the USA with the most gun control have the highest rates of violent crime. Law abiding citizens are the only ones hurt by gun control. You're a faggot who thinks gun control working in Australia or insert random euroshit here means that it would work in the USA. Only problem is we have gangs, nigger culture, poor people and cartels here that would allow criminals to get their hands on guns illegally
Because I live in rural Wyoming and you bleeding heart tree huggers decided it would be a great idea to "reintroduce" packs of hungry wolves in my back yard instead of your own.
bitch got my dick all like wow nigga shit can't wait til we take over Crimea gonna get me some of them fine ass slavic hoes
Because bad guys don't obey the laws.
Because stupid people kill themselves with guns weeding out the bad genetics in the gene pool.
Because niggers are everywhere these days.
Because there is a war against white people and white people need to defend themselves (regardless of what is claimed as a right).
Because guns are fucking awesome and fun to use.
Because they are more humane during hunting.
Because guns can be classified as an art.
Because laws don't protect people.
There is more but I'm tired of typing out your research paper.
Because I learned something from prohibition and the drug war.
Because there are too many fucking people in this country as it is, and they're living to god damn long. If we outlaw guns, red meat, and manually operated automobiles, and make education, vaccinations, and military service compulsory, the population would spiral wildly out of control.
How about you ask this question:
What are you going to do about the multi-racial problems occurring in Europe and the US right now? What are you going to do about the anti-white movements?
How are you going to do it?
It'll go pretty well considering the military supports the constitution. Police too. The only people that would support the ban and enforce it would have to be federal agents. And local law enforcement and national guard would be like "lol no"
They're counting on us breaking ranks and siding with them, as domestic insurgents, against the constitutional elected government of the United States. Every time, they hang their hopes on that.
But you guys understand that we are talking about banning guns by the law...not about random liberals coming into your house and taking them away..
..wow, yeah you're right
It's unconstitutional. And no just because it says "amendment" doesn't mean you can just change it. The bill of rights doesn't work the same way as the rest. The bill of rights is the govt acknowledging that we have those inherent human rights and that the govt will not infringe on them and in fact recognizes them above all other rights. The 2A protects the rest as the govt knows it can not win against the populace. Nor should it try. You wouldn't be able to just "pass a law" just because you want to. And the first time a homeowner with no criminal history is killed by the jackboots you bet your sweet ass something to the tune of 75% of the military and 100% of local law enforcement are going to lock this shit down and probably publicly hang whoever was responsible for treason.
If you plan to uphold the oath you took to uphold the Constitution against all enemies foreign AND domestic, you'd absolutely support the citizenry. If you'd be a jack booted enforcer of unconstitutional shitbaggery, then take off my fucking uniform you blue falcon cuck.
all the better to kill yourself with OP
>uphold the Constitution against all enemies foreign AND domestic
>A gaggle of hayseeds with delusions of grandeur takes up arms and tries to launch a violent coup against the legitimate government and military.
I like how you were able to be somewhat familiar with our purpose, yet not familiar enough to recognize yourself in it.
You have 10 seconds to justify why they should be banned. Protip: unless your plan also disarms all of the criminals and the governments, and makes it utterly impossible to manufacture more, go back to your mommy's basement and shut the fuck up until you get a clue about the real world, and the ways it differs from hypothetical worlds.
Plan involves holding all legal guns in armories, where all owners may be members of their respective well-regulated militias, with periodic maintenance performed by the armory as well as training and mental health evals. Penalty for being caught with a firearm outside an armory is death. Penalty for knowing about someone possessing a firearm outside of an armory and not turning them in is death.
Everything sort of that, quit yer fuckin bitchin.
what's fucked up is Hillary is gonna get in. Appoint some purple haired woman with a dick to scotus. Ban "assault weapons(Kek)" and then move on to the next thing. Most likely classifying bolt action deer rifles as "sniper rifles"(already happening in California). Then to handguns. Once all that's done she might send in the boots for confiscation. But that would be risky. Either way once the 2A is gone it'll be states rights next. Then freedom of speech and religion(Christians only affected of course). We already don't have freedom of the press. Maybe no freedom of assembly unless you're BLM. Either way she seeks to neuter the populace. And create an America where she truly has absolute power. With the scotus pick it's a definite possibility. And in that situation we may very well not get to vote next time.
sounds brilliant, when do we start?
start off lovingly then as you get into it begin to hate fuck
Not to burst your little red dawn fantasy here, but I shouldn't need to point out that the instant you acted on your traitorous concept, you'd be apprehended individually in minor police actions and improsoned, before any sort of a movement could grow legs. And if by some miracle you actually had enough people in enough areas going all at once to stand a chance of actually being a threat to anyone that couldn't be talked down, you'd all be basically vaporized from fucking space kek.
You think the US military would play nice when faced with a credible domestic threat? You'd be dead before you heard the bomb falling.
Murder isn't a feeling or emotion. Mass shootings aren't feelings or emotions. They are actions. Legislation based on actions.
Stop being so purposefully obtuse, you fucking cunt.
>muh police state
commie fags btfo
Makes up 0.2% of 0.6% of all death. Statistically insignificant. The only reason to ban guns because of this would be "omg that's so scary I'm afraid for my safety" yet you're probably the same guy saying it's ok to increase our refugee intake 550% because "it's statistically impossible for you to be involved in a terrorist attack these guys are totes cool man"
Your the traitor you pussy sellout nu-male cuck bitch
Exactly. None of you dillweeds have shit to say to a JDAM coming down on your position any more than a towelhead does.
Doesn't fit within your 1940s era warfare scenario, so must be impossibru. Get rekt faggots.
>not reading the fucking rebuttal to your retarded mindset
>it's current year
>lol I win goys
because I have a small dick and a very weak body so I need a gun to make me feel big and strong.
Fuck me daddy
Because the law is not a physical entity
The law says you can't own machine guns or magazines with 10+ rounds, certain handguns her in CA
And all I'm going to say is that that stuff is surprisingly easy to come by if you know a few names
what part of "SHALL NOT" and "BE INFRINGED" do you not understand
To keep this out of the bill of rights.
It won't stop those who who have a goal in their mind you see.
Banning guns does not reduce Crime. Look at Chicago.
If you have a gun, no one can make you do what you do not want to.
You can protect yourself and loved ones.
The first thing the Fire Nation did when they conquered the other nations was disable their ability to fight back, IE they took all their benders and stuck them in concentration camps.
It is interesting that politicians bought and paid for by Saudi Arabia and the UAE want to outlaw guns and encourage mass immigration from the middle east.
Because the benefits vastly outweigh the problems. Defensive uses dwarf homicides and even dwarf all gun death in America. You have 30000 avg gun deaths per year. 17000 are homicides. All data available confirms a verifiable total of between 100k-200k defensive uses per year with unprovable estimates saying it's potentially between 1-2M uses per year. And of those defensive uses 99.9% result in no shots fired. Even if all 30k gun deaths were murders there would be no cause for banning except your pwecious widdle pwogwessive feefees.
firearm related deaths per capita
Guns per capita
You were saying?
I really don't get this defense. It's way harder to acquire guns illegally than it is legally. You will be giving criminals less avenues to obtain illegal firearms, which will literally result directly in fewer deaths.
The part about the well-regulated militia. You know, the first part, they put right up front, on account of it being the purpose of the second part. Not sure why that keeps going missing from your quoting of the amendment.
Those aren't two totally separate ideas that have nothing to do with each other in that one sentence.
You want the equipment of the well-regulated militia, to use as your personal toys, and without doing your part in the well-regulated militia to deserve them, or be responsible owners and operators of them.
No one ever explained rights and responsibilities to you, so you want the rights without the responsibilities. Congrats, you're no better than niggers and feminists, who see everything as a gimme.
And every time you idiots open your mouth you make the rest of us look bad. Fuck you.
Damn sure makes em wetter than a 5'5" faggot with a handlebar mustache constantly going on about real men and their murder machines(that they can't have because of that felony pot charge they got in college)
Wait what? Harder to get a gun illegally??? You know nothing if this is what you think. I can go literally 12 blocks from my house right now and buy a gun off some black dude for less than 100 dollars.
Because at the end of the day no one wants to ban guns. What gun control advocated really want is to take away guns from citizens by force (using guns) and give all the guns to the police (which they say are evil) and the government.
Because the government can be trusted and the people cant.
And remember if criminals (with guns) attempt to harm you in any way, call the guys with the guns to come solve your problems while you fall on the floor and curl up in a fetal position.
No it isn't. Go back to your gated community.
Wtf is up with capcha lately?
its not just "banning" them from purchase, its production, however there are already hundreds of millions of weapons in circulation.. you act like the banning of weapons has no effect, however all over the world including places that have guns that are legal have certain guns and other weapon that are banned and it is RARE to see them in the hands of anyone.. wake the fuck up faggot.
it's ultimately pointless. I can knife you or run you over just as easy.
So I guess when you shoot someone instead of punching them or hitting them with something or stabbing its safe to assume survival rate is exactly the same... which is slim to none.. just as with gun related suicide, which is usually what faggots do with guns anyway.
Funny story. The Supreme Court of the United States has held that
1) they are in fact two separate clauses
2) every fighting age male US citizen is part of the militia
3) the term "the people" refers to each individual US citizen.
Please take your bullshit elsewhere
The whole proletariat must be armed at once with muskets, rifles, cannon and ammunition, and the revival of the old-style citizens’ militia, directed against the workers, must be opposed. Where the formation of this militia cannot be prevented, the workers must try to organize themselves independently as a proletarian guard, with elected leaders and with their own elected general staff; they must try to place themselves not under the orders of the state authority but of the revolutionary local councils set up by the workers. Where the workers are employed by the state, they must arm and organize themselves into special corps with elected leaders, or as a part of the proletarian guard. Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary.
Because as long as murricans have gunz in every white trash & nigger household, it keeps the filthy losers pacified into thinking they have ultimate control over others lives. Maintaining this false sense of superiority and power is essential in keeping them complacent and from actually siezing any real power.
It's the same principle behind why a lot of other things shouldn't be banned, the right to private property. If the gov't didn't acknowledge our rights to own our own stuff, on our own property, to utilize in the manner we wish so long as it doesn't cause an issue to national security or the safety of other citizens, then we would be living under a dictatorship.
> it's like banning toasters or cars because they can be used to kill people.
That's just what the workers want you to think ;)
Armyfag here, yeah....how many gun toting rednecks are veterans? too many to count.
if I go to war against any group of Americans its going to be against the fags burning down neighborhoods and shooting cops.
Take notice how most of the countries with the higher rates of homicides are countries where guns are typically heavily restricted.