do people actually think the answer is 10...

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.

Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random

Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random

Thread images: 34

File: 14138330_877892482347473_1708981845_n.png (45 KB, 206x206)
Image search:
[iqdb]
[SauceNao]
[Google]

45 KB, 206x206

do people actually think the answer is 10 or at they just trolling

>>

>trolling

>>

Should be 54

>>

>this is probably bait, but i'll explain it for anyone who suffered massive brain damage as a child

6^2 = 36

so we have 36/2(3) + 4

2(3) = 6

36/6 = 6(duh)

then 6 + 4 = 10

>>

>>701127457

No shit, when it is obviously either 5 or 3.6

>>

>>701127884

58. Add the 4 at the end.

>>

>>701128246

Why are you treating the 2(3) as a single term? It's not a true parenthetical. It's an alternate way to write 2 x 3. Thus the answer is 58.

>>

>>701128246

Kek

>>

>>701128246

This. And calculators don't follow Order Of Operations, so don't try to Google the answers.

>>

>>701127884

No, it's 58.

>>

3.6

>>

>>701127457

6^2 % 2(3) + 4

36 % 2(3) + 4

36 % 6 + 4

6 + 4

=10

>>

>>701127457

See, the problem is that you're fucking retarded and don't know how to properly format a math problem.

>>

>>701128759

This.

>>

>>701128517

It's still parenthesized, ergo the answer really is 10.

Let me make it perfectly clear for you. "for ($i = 0; $i < 10; $i++)" cannot be rewritten as "$i = 0123456789" and expect to give you the same results.

>>

>>701128759

This. A mathematician would laugh at you if you expressed it this way.

>>

>>701128976

Then how about this anon: >>701128759 who has a valid point?

It is fucking atupid to put parentheticals on that. It's a move made by jaded teachers who realise they aren't getting anywhere in life and just want kids to suffer.

>>

>>701128759

This.

36 / 2(3) is vague and can be read

(36 / 2) 3 or 36 / (2 x 3)

>>

It's 58

Multiplication and division are done in order of left to right not multiply then divide.

>>

>>701129175

It's stupid, but it's still a parenthesis and must be treat as one. A coder would laugh at you if you said the answer was 58.

>>

>Follow thee order newfag

P= parentheses

E= equation

M= multiply

D= divide

A= add

S= subtract

>>

>>701129481

>Please Eat My Dirty Ass Steve

>>

>>701129326

Exactly, which is why the answer is 10

>>

It's 154 fucking shitters

>>

>>701129481

what about exponents you nigger?

>>

>>701128246

PEMDAS you nigger

>>

>>701129712

They're classed as multiplication.

>>

>>701129374

> coder

A programmer would write the expression either as

6**2 / 2 * 3 +4 or 6**2 / (2 * 3) + 4 the question is which one of these is the same as idiot OPs expression?

And it's not parenthesized since 2(3) is 2 * 3 and not (2 *3)

>>701128759 is right

>>

>>701129481

> equation

You done goofed m80.

>>

>>701128759

>See, the problem is, I don't know how to read a mathematical problem

I fixed that for you, anon.

6^2/2(3)+4

Prof. Anon's Math Class is in session, listen closely children.

First, we do the parenthesis, there's none of those. So, we do the Exponents, 6^2, AKA 6*6 for anyone who doesn't know how exponents work. Don't forget to rewrite your problem after each solution to not lose your place!

6^2=36

36/2(3)+4

Next, we do Multiplication OR Division, from left to right, so we're doing the Division now.

36/2=18

18(3)+4

We've still got multiplication to do, so we'll take care of that!

18(3)=54

54+4=

All that's left is to do the addition, and we've got our answer.

54+4=58

Don't forget to do your homework!

>>

BODMAS

Brackets

POwers

Division

Multiplication

Addition

Subtraction

In that order

>>

have you ever noticed all of these "LOL YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO MATH" posts involve, without a doubt, the obelus instead of parentheticals or a horizontal bar?

I'm on to you, shitlords

>>

>>701129481

>taking the bait

>calling others newfag

>not pulling that butt plug out of your ass

>>

>>701127457

36/6 = 6

6+4 = 10

>>

>>701128564

exactly. i program calculators for a living and i don't even know what "order of operations" means.

>>

>>701128976

>>701129212

>>701128246

i realize you assholes are trolling, but since this place is flooded with children and the current generation is already shitty enough:

this can only be correctly read as 6 squared, divided by 2, multiplied by 3, plus 4.

you evaluate everything INSIDE the parentheses first, and then treat the result as a single term when evaluating the next level outside the parentheses, so OoO means that you perform the division by two before the multiplication. there is no other correct way to interpret the statement because math is a non-ambiguous language (otherwise, you wouldn't be able to punch in expressions and have your calculator understand them).

>>

>>701129374

And why would I listen to a codemonkey? Math is just applied philosophy. Being a philosopher, I think I would know how it actually works

>>

>>701129878

this you faggots

>>701129481

PEMDAS doesn't mean you do what's around the parentheses first; it means that you do what's INSIDE the parentheses first.

knowing this removes all ambiguity from an otherwise ambiguiously-written problem.

>>

>>701129374

The parenthesis are only around the 3. They effectively vanish, replaced with a multiplication sign. Then left to right. Answer is 58.

>>

>>701128564

>This, dont bother fact checking me!

>>

>>701130084

>applied philosophy

Zozzle

>>

>>701128246

you do 36/2 first you dumb retard.

2(3) != (2(3))

>>

Can /b/ solve this?

Gv = ∫_{0}^{Δv} dv = -v0*

There will be an award.

>>

>>701129878

No, worthless faggot, you don't understand. Any child knows the god damn order of operations. The issue is that only useless cocksuckers would ever format it the way op did. No one does math like that. It's written to be super convoluted intentionally, and op is just a stupid cunt and lacks extremely basic communication skills.

>>

ITT people who never took pre-calc or higher think the answer is 10

look at them

look at them and laugh

>>

>using ur own brain instead of using ur phone

>>

>>701130005

>i program calculators for a living

>>

>ITT faggots taking "parentheses" too literally

>PEMDAS means RESOLVE the parentheses FIRST

other anons are right-- 2(3) is considered a single term.

>>

>>701128475

>>701128572

Oh shit lol, yea thanks

>>

>>701127457

the answer is ten

i have a phd in math

>>

>>701130397

Delta v?

>>

>>701130078

Clearly you didn't pay attention in class.

You're even spouting the thing you're getting wrong.

BODMAS

PEDMAS whatever the fuck you want to call it.

The very first letter tells you to resolve the parenthesis first.

>>

>>701130397

That's not a problem. That's just an autistic declaration of a variable.

>>

>>701130585

Yea, the parentheses just indicate multiplication. If it was (2(3)) then it would be different. But people are fucking retarded so it's no use.

>>

>>701130437

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the way op formatted it, if you look at it, it's formatted quite nicely. It's all left to right, you don't have to go to the middle of the problem and pick out the part you have to do. You're just a fucking retard.

It's fucking BASIC math

>>

>>701130726

and several damage brain u nigger

>>

>>701130397

Solve for what?

>>

>>701130726

u should get a refund, mate. or, at least see if they'll let you exchange it for something else.

>>

0.3

>>

>>701130821

Yeah, I was just fixing to post that point too. Even if its two terms, multiplication is the very next step so you're still handling that entire phrase first.

>>

The question is written incorrectly.

Order of operations is irrelevant, the obelus makes it ambiguous as to which numbers are in the divisor.

There are three equally correct answers, depending on how you interpret the obelus: 54, 10, and 3.6

This is why an obelus is incorrect notation for proper equations.

>>

>>701127457

And that ladies and gentlemen, ist the reason no European student uses the god damn divis after grade 4 anymore...

>>

>>701130798

again, for the sake of the childrens...

the parens resolve to a value of 3. if it was 6^2/2(3-2) + 4 then the answer would be 22. just because the 2 is next to the (3) doesn't mean you perform that Multiplication before the division to the left.

and again, I know you're just being a troll, but kids are dumb enough already

>>

>>701130798

>The very first letter tells you to resolve the parenthesis first.

Yes, and there is nothing inside the parenthesis to SOLVE you dense shit.

(3) is not a problem, it's the same as saying *3 or multiplied by 3, and as we know you do not do multiplication first unless it is inside a parenthesis, which it is not.

(2(3)) would be in parenthesis, which states the 2 MUST be multiplied by the 3

2(3) is just saying multiply whatever is to the left of the 3, which in the case of the problem is 18, NOT 2. because you START with exponents THEN move left to right doing division OR multiplication

Did you fail 5th grade math? This is not complex at all.

>>

>>701131134

it's not ambiguous; you can't write an expression ambiguously, just incorrectly.

>>

>>701130397

I'm feeling 8. Yuhp. The answer is definitely b8

>>

Are y'all really this retarded?

It's 3,6

>>

Solve the equations for x

6^2/2(x)+4=58

6^2/2(x)+4-4=58-4

36/2(x)=54

18(x)/18=54/18

x=3

Now solve for the resultant being 10

6^2/2(x)+4=10

6^2/2(x)+4-4=10-4

36/2(x)=6

18(x)/18=6/18

x=.33333

therefore by proof the answer is 58

>>

>>701130000

Quads confirm it's 10. End of discussion.

>>

36/ 2(3) + 4

Okay now lets do the parenthesis (3) = 3

Okay, done.

Now lets go left to right to see what we do first in division or multiplication.

36/2 x 3 + 4

18 x 3 + 4

54 + 4

58

Game over bitches

>>

You resolve what is INSIDE the parentheses, and 3 doesn't need to be resolved further.

6^2/2*(3)+4

6^2/2*3+4

36/2*3+4

18*3+4

54+4

58

>>

>>701130491

It clearly says 6² not 6^2. It's a small number not some weird hat between the numbers. Go fuck yourself...

>>

>>701131405

>,

eurofag detected

>>

Its PEMDAS but really it can be read as PE/MD/AS

>>

>>701131379

You're creating a distinction without a difference. It's incorrect because it's ambiguous.

>>

>2(3) = 6 (P)

>6 ^ 2 = 9 (E)

>NO (M) because 2(3) is a single term that was resolved during the (P) step

>9 / 6 = 1.5 (D)

>1.5 + 4 = 5.5 (A)

>no (S) obviously

cunts

>>

>>701127457

420

>>

>>701131509

>being that retarded

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_mark#/media/File:DecimalSeparator.svg

>>

>>

>>701131413

while i admire your gusto, it's wasted effort. these fuckers can't even read...

besides, isn't proof just a lie promulgated by the cis white patriarchy?

>>

>>701131614

nigga what

>>

>>701131509

Yes I think it's well established that we have a lot of Europeans on 4skin.

>>

>>701130834

Wowee, you sure are one dumb nigger. It's formatted like absolute shit. "Going from left to right and looking nice" is not what separates a well formatted mathematical expression from an ill formatted one. That's what a useless broad who majored in art history would think counts as nice formatting. A well formatted mathematical expression would be written unambiguously and clearly. It would use parentheses to separate terms properly. It would not start these types of arguments.

And it sure as hell would not use the god damn "divided by" symbol that first graders use.

This whole thread is full of retards for even discussing what the answer should be, but anyone claiming it's a good question in the first place is a whole new level of fucktard.

>>

>>701127457

58

36/2 x 3 +4

18 x 3 + 4

54 + 4

58

>>

>>701131567

Well the parentheses do come before exponents so more like P/E/MD/AS but yeah you seem to get it. Multiplication and division are effectively the same operation, and same for addition and subtraction.

>>

ITT: people who forget that when the order of operations is the same (e.g., multiplication and division), we must evaluate the expression from left to right and so no expression can ever be ambiguous (only misinterpreted)

>>

ITT: people argue about whether to multiply or divide first

>>

>>701131590

no. and incorrect expression would be either mechanically incorrect (3 +/ 7) or syntactically incorrect (3 + 7 when you meant 3 - 7). any valid expression is unambiguous because the language used to communicate mathematical expressions is unambiguous. because the rules don't allow for more than one correct interpretation of a valid expression, the language is unambiguous.

>>

>>701127457

Shitty way to write a 6. I read it as Lo.

And it's 42.

>>

>>701131948

qft

>>

>>701131948

This.

>>

>>701131688

sorry. but honestly, you shouldn't be upset. none of the other places that use a comma even count as real countries. just go w/ european; it's the best you're gonna get.

>>

>>

Dafook 12 yo anons"

6^2/2(3)+4 = 36/2*3+4

= 18*3+4

= 54+4

= 58

>>

>>701132139

Shit no wonder, I kept squaring Lo and got Hi

>>

>>701127457

P E M D A S

E

M

D

A

S

>>

>>701131614

ive worked as an 8th grade math teachers aide for too long and i want to kill myself but that is the answer.

>>

>>701132266

wouldn't Lo^2 be LoLo?

>>

1. Take care of the distribution to put the problem into simplest terms.

6^2/6+4

2. Apply the order of operations

36/6+4

6+4

10

>>

>>701131476

you dumb nigger

>>

>>701131614

2(3) is M, not P

>>701132369

thank god you're only an aide... though, i don't imagine they're going to stop you from becoming an actual math teacher on some minor technicality like not knowing how math works.

>>

>>701127457

c/a*b≠c/ab

c/ab=c/a(b)

c/a*b≠c/a(b)

>>

>>701131858

Why would you need parenthesis when you can just SOLVE IT FROM LEFT TO RIGHT.

Let me just add all this extra shit to this problem that doesn't need to be there because I'm retarded and can't read a 3rd-grade level mathematical problem.

Do you write 3*2 as (3*2)?

Are you so dense you have to write ((1+2)+3) for it to make sense ?

NO, you fucking don't, get over yourself with your convoluted bullshit.

No one is going to put parenthesis in a problem that is THAT fucking simple unless there would be something that would break the order of operations, for example: 6^2/(2*3)+4

>>

>>701132600

it's already in it's simplest terms. rewrite it as:

(6)^(2)/(2)(3)+(4)

>>

>>701132139

i thought it would be gamma of golden ratio, and he's retardet and writing upside down

>>

>>701132409

So LoLo + 10 = loli = /b/.

>>

>>701132205

You really must be some retarded nigger. Germany, France and Russia, places where almost all fuckin modern math evolved and the biggest fuckin problems where solved are using the decimal comma. The US plus the worst African shitholes plus fucking China and Abo Kingdom are using a decimal point. Just kill yourself.

>>

>>701130341

nigga that rubix cube is half solved wtf

>>

>>701130344

>>701128517

>>701130078

You're joking, right?

>>

>>701133026

I love this game

>>

anyone who does this:

6^2/2*3+4

= 36/2*3+4

=18*3+4

is WRONG bc it doesn't preserve the cummatitive property of multiplication

if you can agree than 2*3 = 3*2

than do you divide 6^2 by 2 or 3 ?

really you're supposed to divide by 2*3 which is 6

therefore:

6^2/2*3+4 = 36/6 +4 = 6+4

>>

>>701133510

Classic. Better then this troll discussion.

>>

answer is my last two digits

>>

>>701131948

THIS

this is the real issue. people think that a / is the same as a vinculum division bar. it's not. the vinculum implies additional parentheses, but the simple division bar does not, so we proceed from left to right.

>>

>>701127457

the whole discussion is pointless. Maths will and does give the exact answer as 10. First paranthesis, then exponentials, then multiplicative or dividing terms, with addition and substraction last.

Anyone answering 58 simply didn't listen in 2nd grade and didn't bother to educate themselves beyond anything a calculator can output better and quicker than they are able to.

>>

>>701133898

Calculator also said 58.

>>

seriously, you're all fucking idiots that haven't graduated high school yet, yet alone taken any calculus-level math.

>(x)(y) is the same thing as x * y and x × y

>x÷y is the same thing as x/y and (x)/(y)

>x÷y+z is the same thing as x/y+z but is NOT the same as x/(y+z)

>x÷(y+z) is the same thing as x/(y+z)

>x/y(z) is the same thing as x/y*z, which is the same thing as x/yz

knowing these things removes any possible ambiguity from this problem. like many anons in this thread have already said: this problem is not ambiguous; it is only being incorrectly interpreted, which makes you (the interpreter) WRONG.

the answer is 58

>>

>>701127457

With that formatting it seems like it is 58, but the 6^2 should be put as a numerator to 2(3), making a fraction like so.

Solve the 6^2 and 2(3) independently to get 36 over 6.

Now you have 6+4

6+4=10

Pic related

>>

>>701133612

You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

The commutative property has nothing to do with anything you just said, except that 2*3 = 3*2. Which is completely irrelevant to the rest of the problem, because we are not multiplying 2 by 3, we are multiplying 18 by 3.

>P/E/MD/AS/

>Parenthesis

>Exponents

>Multiplication OR Division FROM LEFT TO RIGHT.

>Addition OR subtraction from LEFT TO RIGHT.

Is it that fucking hard to understand?

>>

>>701134438

And this is why the USA is shit tier in math..

>>

>>701134441

No, a vinculum division bar (---) is not the same as a regular division bar (/). See >>701133691

>>

File: shaun-king-tweet-2-confederate-flag.jpg (28 KB, 600x481)
Image search:
[iqdb]
[SauceNao]
[Google]

28 KB, 600x481

>>

>>701134527

>Is it that fucking hard to understand?

For /b/tards? Yes.

>>

>>701127457

the 2 in brackets is bait.

>>

>>701133898

wrong

>>701134441

wrong

>>701134606

europoor

see >>701134438 any and every answer you will ever need regarding this problem

>>

>>701134438

according to your reasoning shouldn't it be 10?

>>

>>701134798

the 2 in brackets is the 2nd multiplication after the exponent... the question is bait...

>>

>>701134621

There's no way they're different, or we'd use ÷ and not bother with / to divide.

>>

>>701134441

kek

>>

>>701134967

101

>>

>>701134967

102

>>

BEDMAS

Brackets

Exponents

Division/Multiplication in any order

Addition/Subtraction in any order

That's what I was taught.

As long as you make sure multiplication always commutes and division doesn't there's never any ambiguity.

>>

>>

>>701134967

101

>>

>>701128564

>calculators don't follow Order Of Operations

>>

>>701129374

check this nigger out... he thinks he's a "coder"

lele faggot

it's 58 so suck my meaty cock

>>

>>701134967

red = 20

blue = 5

double yellow = 2

single yellow = 1

20 + 20 + 20 = 60

20 + 5 + 5 = 30

5 - 2 = 3

1 + 20 x 5 = 101

>>

wow this turned to a meme

>>

>>701135699

obviously an American....

>>

>>701135243

>>701135404

>As long as you make sure multiplication always commutes and division doesn't there's never any ambiguity.

What does that have to do with the equation?

NOTHING that's what.

3*2 is the same as 2*3

36/2 is not the same as 2/36

That is all the commutative property says. That still holds true even in this problem.

>Division/Multiplication in any order

>Addition/Subtraction in any order

>Let me just solve this problem in any order I feel like because that's totally how math works

And they say American education is bad.

>>

>>701131858

You stupid fucking nigger, this problem is formatted as if the 3 was a substitute for X. You're right that any regular day to day math user wouldn't write it this way, but this is meant for a basic algebra student who needs to learn to pay attention and read the whole question

>>

>>701128246

This is right. Numbers on the outside of brackets (britfag) multiply the numbers on the inside. 2(3) is just a different way of writing 2x3.

6^2=36.

2x3=6

36/6=6

6+4=10

Is it really hard??

>>

ITT:

>what is order of operations

>>

>>701127457

take ur Fagbook math off of 4chan you dumb nigger.

>>

>>701136378

That isn't how order of operations works, britbong.

See the last bit of >>701136241

>>

>>701129374

what are you talking about

>>

>>701134967

correction its actually 81

>red = 20

>blue = 5

>double yellow = 2

>single yellow = 1

and the last blue flower has only 4 petals which makes it = 4

>20 + 20 + 20 = 60

>20 + 5 + 5 = 30

>5 - 2 = 3

>1 + 20 x 4 = 81

>>

>>701136378

American here, that's how i was taught.

>>

>>701137274

You probably went to school in the 80's

Before "common core"..

>>

>>701134897

no

>>701127457 (OP)

image related: please pass basic algebra before attempting to function on the internet. listen to this post >>701134438

i even color-coded it for you faggots

>>

Order of operations is as follows:

Parentheses

Exponents

Multiplication

Division

Addition

Subtraction

Parentheses

2(3) is now 6

6^2 / 6 + 4

Exponents

6^2 is now 36

36 / 6 + 4

Multiplication

There is none

Division

36 / 6 is now 6

6 + 4

Addition

6 + 4 is now 10

>>

>>701137105

oh shit nigger

>>

>>701134438

no it's one word, also this is all semi-invalid and forbidden to use in math, you shouldn't even do anything like a(a*b+c)+n you should use a*(... or die in normal people math, nothing doing with it >>701132703

>>

>>701137693

>Parentheses

>2(3) is now 6

The 2 is not in the parenthesis anon, why are you solving that as if it is?

>>

>>701136378

What you did would make sense if the problem was 6^2/(2*3)+4

>>

>>701129374

Code is executed from left to right when there are no priorities. That's like the first thing you learn. Parentheses around a single operator do nothing.

>>

easy

6^2/2*3 + 4

6^1*3 + 4

6^3 + 4

216 + 4

220

>>

>>701137854

Order of operations is as follows:

Parentheses

Exponents

Multiplication

Division

Addition

Subtraction

Parentheses

There is none

Exponents

6^2 is now 36

36 / 2(3) + 4

Multiplication

2(3) is now 6

36 / 6 + 4

Division

36 / 6 is now 6

6 + 4

Addition

6 + 4 is now 10

same answer

>>

>>701137540

>(6)^(2)/(2)(3)+(4)

f

>>

>>701134438

oops, that last part i wrote was wrong. x/yz isn't the same as any of those

>>

I fucking love how americans only remember PEMDAS and forget that multiplication and division have the same priority. As do addition and substraction.

>>

>>701137540

kkkkk

>>

>>

>>701138520

Why would multiplication have higher priority than division?

>>

>>701127457

Make the answer "I can not answer this question due to religious beliefs"

>>

>>701134967

From a moderate autistic view and under the assumption that this puzzle is supposed to work like normal arithmetics, there is no answer. You have a system of 4 linear equations with 6 different variables (Yes, "two yellow flowers" would be a different symbol then "yellow flower" with a 2 in front). Therefore it's underdetermined therefore there's no answer.

>>

>>701134967

i'm going to say 100 + sqrt(2)

since all other additive terms are splitted when there are more then one, the 2 yellows would be a weird exception, so i'm interpreting the double yellow as yellow*yellow

>>

>>701138798

>>701139032

They are totally the same priority, just makes it easy it you do it letter by letter.

>>

>>701140343

To elaborate, in American school we are taught to spell out PEMDAS as P/E/MD/AS

>>

>>701139346

This. You would also have to do different assumptions for multiple flowers and different petal count. These are two seperate expressions and can't mean the same thing, i.e. coefficient. As in two flowers means 2*x, 4 petals means (4/5)*x can't work.

>>

>>701140343

But you get different results asshat.

>>

>>701136241

multiplication doesn't always commute

like quaternions

>>

/b/ is so much smarter during European early afternoon hours

>>

>>701140343

Why did you multiply 2 and 3 then, when the problem says that you should divide 6 squared by 2?

>>

>>701140260

While I vote for no answer I still like your idea.

>>

>>701141478

also voting for no answer now, just saw that the last blue flower is missing a petal ..., no valid solution, unless you're willing to see it as a 4 instead of a 5

>>

>>701136241

i²=j²=k²=ijk=-1

ij=k

ji=-k

jk=i

kj=-1

ki=j

ik=-j

>>

>>701141453

return to middle school pls

>>

>>701141947

Maybe I will when you give me a proper answer

>>

>>701135610

> fags born in 21st century won't get this, just like you :^)

>>

>>701142099

bridge troll on the patrol

>>

>>701127457

6^2=12 while 2(3) is 6, 12/6 is 2 + 4 =6

>>

>>701143264

this sets a new level for sad

>>

>there are retards ITT that think multiplying stuff attached to parentheses is P priority in PEMDAS when it is actually MD priority

>>

>>701127457

What the fuck I got six

>>

>>701143264

6^2 is 36 you tit

>>

>>701143433

How foolish they must feel

>>

>>701143480

>>701143423

another one achieves the same level

>>

always do boarders first so

either 3+4

so 36÷2+7 = 25

>>

>>701143264

fucking retard

>>

order of operations as taught in elementary school:

1. square

2. multiply

3. divide

4. add

??????

>10

we don't really need a thread about this do we?

>>

>>701143433

its bomdas

boarders first

of multiple division addiction substraction

fucking retards on /b/ that forget bodmas is always the way

>>

>People think 2(3) = (2 • 3) when actually 2(3) = 2 • 3

>mrw

>>

>>701143751

Must have been hard being the slow kid in elementary school

>>

>>701127457

Are you sure it's 6? not 10 or 20?

>>

>>701130397

there is no answer, there is no problem.

>>

consider the following

>>

>>

>>

>>701141849

No, go fuck a lama

>>

>>701129374

Coders are coders not mathmeticians. How code handles this is irrevlevant

>>

>>701127457

The people that are getting 10 are using the PEMDAS method of course. However here is the problem. They are taking the method way literally, you're supose to solve the problem Left to right ~>.

I think we agree we all get to the part of the problem

36/2(3)+4 or 36/2*3+4

Now we get to the part of MD (multiply, divide) of PEMDAS.

What you are suppose to do here is divide (D)

so 36/2 is 16

"WHAT, BUT THE "M" COMES FIRST. YOU'RE FUCKING STUPI-"

Yeah, but its either Multiply or Divide.

You're suppose to be working the problem from left to right ~>

Do you guys not remember your 7th Grade teacher saying "Either or" during math?

>>

>>701144284

Roll, it's weird.

>>

>>701146299

No 81, look at the flowers

>>

>>701127457

This is why America is NOT #1!!!

Either you're stupid or you're an asshole.

Maybe both.

>>

http://wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%5E2%2F2%283%29%2B4

58 it is

>>

>6² / 2 (3) + 4 = 0

>36 / 2 * 3 + 4 = 0

>18 * 3 + 4 = 0

>54 + 4 = 0

>58 = 0

This equation is untrue.

>>

>>701127457

2(3)=6

6²=36

36/6=6

6+4=10

The first number is really 6? It looks like a 10

>>

>>701147959

2 is not in parentheses so 2(3) does not have priority

>>

>>701148396

what are these parentheses for?!

It's look like an invitation to multiply.

>>

>>701129481

exponent not equation you retard

>>

>>701127457

Pemdas

>>

>>701148652

Yes, it is. But only 3 has priority, the multiplication does not. Is a trick to make you do a mistake and evaluate 2×3 instead of 36/2. You will see if when you replace (3) with (3×1).

>>

>>701148652

Lets take this equation for an example:

>2(3x + 4)

First you open the parenthesis:

>2 * 3x + 2 * 4

Which brings us to the final step:

>6x + 8

The parenthesis on the original equation has no effect.

>>

Everyone shut up am an engineer

the problem can be written as

(3(6^2))/2+4

>>

>>701127457

This thread is full of retards it's 58 because (3) returns just 3.

Proof: https://ideone.com/xqkj9V

>>

10

PEMDAS

>>

>>701127457

The answer is 6

>>

>>701127457

>saving the thumbnail

it's still 10 though

>>

Here is the answer you stupid clowns

6x2 = 12, x 2 x 3 = 72 + 4 = 76

Case closed

>>

>>701149140

6²/2x(1x3)+4

36/2x3+4 (left to right? but i really want to 2x3 before but ok let's try)

18x3+4

54+4

58

Humpf ok...

>>

>>701149301

yes but 2X3... :'(

>>

>>701149419

how the fuck it could be 6?!

'tard!

>>

>>701149720

wut???

>>

So KEK

The amount of autards that think they are smart and trying to argue against mathematical proofs is fucking funny. Internet math heros. LULZ

>>

>>701128246

either bait or retarded

>>

>>701129146

Anyone's life is way more interesting than a nerd mathematician so who fucking cares about that

>>

No one who is a mathematician would write OPs question the way they did. However with the current way it is written the answer is 58.

Here is our question:

6^2/2(3)+4

First step is to return the value in the brackets, this is where OP is trying to trick you. However the value is simply returned if there is no operation in the brackets. So the question becomes:

6^2/2x3+4

Next we calculate our exponents

36/2x3+4

If we were retarded we would screw up at this step. Both multiplication and division share the same hierarchy in the order of operations, however this question is left-associative so we must divide first and we get:

18x3+4

Next we multiply:

54+4

Then add four for our total of:

58

Next time stack exponents to really fuck with people OP.

>>

>>701134438

>(x)/(y)

Are you fucking stupid? This notation is useless and no one uses it.

Mathematician here.

>>

isack newtun here: the answer is 1

>>

>>701151556

This.

While some anons are correct in saying that mathfags are massive nerds, it doesn't change the fact that the way this problem is written results in an answer of 58.

Source: math classes up to String Theory before I realized that only gooks take that level of math

>>

Just use pemdas or bedmas correctly and not like a nigger and you will get 58. Tard fucks.

>>

>>701152227

of asians are so smart then why can't they drive for shit?

>>

>>701152404

Too busy thinking about the equations that figure out warp drive.

>>

>>701152567

how ironic

>>

>>701127457

It's 22

>>

God 4Chan is so fucking dumb, literally only one way to read this problem.

PEMDAS puts no precedence on MD or AS it's just left to right

The answer is 58, if you say otherwise then you didn't go to college and you can't prove otherwise.

>>

2(3) should be treated as one number. everytime this thread comes up i think

Its just another way to write 6. Nothing else.

>>

are you fucking mental?

>>

>>701152953

this

>>

>>701152937

wolfram alpha treats 2(3) as 2*3. Its not the same. Its not elementary math. Well actually it is, but probably not in the US

>>

>>701152953

6^2/2(3) +4 is the same as 6^2/(2(3)) +4

PEMDAS isn't taught any other way

>>

>>701128517

>not a true parenthetical

its been specified, thats why theyre there, because whoever the fucking wrote the fucking thing wanted it to be done before the fucking division, they are parenthesis, thats all, theyre there you cant just not follow the rules cause you dont like it

>>

>>701145725

You cant separate 2(3) like that. Its not 6^2/2. 2(3) is a number that cant be separated unless you divide everything by 3.

>>

>>701153605

2(3) 2*3 2 × 3 are all the same dumbass

>>

>>701152227

Strings theory, with some wormholes interdimensional portals, it's fuckin cool, but hey maths... :(

>>

For anyone in this thread that has autism.

>>

>>701153678

(You)

>>

>>701153926

dosent matter, you cant separate 2(3) in that equasion at all unless you divide everything by 3.

which will also eventually give you 10.

>>

>>701154116

If they are all the same thing then you can separate you dumb nigger

See >>701154067

>>

>>701154231

well you cant separate them in that equasion because its written like 2(3). Its not elementary math so im not surprised most people dont know this.

You cant just take the two out of it, and divide it by 36. If something should be divided by 36 its the entirety of 2(3) aka 6. Because you cant split up a number that is next to a parenthesis liek that

>>

>>701154538

YES YOU CAN. It's literally just another way to write the expressions that I linked in the picture. It's just that most people prefer writing 2(3) to remove the "×" so it's not confused with a variable. All of those expressions mean the same thing and are treated the exact same way.

>>

>>701154538

2(3) is functionally identical to 2*3 you silly fucking oaf

>>

>>701127457

i think pic should answer

>>

>>701154741

¨no you cant. you ALWAYS have to deal with the parenthesis first. ALWAYS. there are NO exeptions.

>>

>>701127457

>701127457

PEMDAS You pleb, It's is 10

>>

>>701154965

Yeah you have to solve what is inside the parenthesis you downie.

Get back to your manual labor

>>

>>701154965

2 isn't in the parenthesis you dumb ass. Yeah if it was (2*3) or (2(3)) then yes you would multiply first but it isn't written like that

>>

>>701127457

This formula isn't formatted as well as it could be, so two answers can be gotten

>>

>>701154992

>It's is 10

>It is is 10

Yeah this literally explains anyone who says 10 in one post. top laff

>>

6^2 = 36

2(3) = 6

36÷6 =6+4 = 10

Answer is 10

>>

>>701127457

PEMDAS

Parenthesis 2•3=6

Exponents 6•6 36

Multiply/Divide 36/6=6

Add/subtract 6+4=10

Op is a retard who can't pass the ninth grade and we should laugh at him

>>

>>701155124

haha actually im an engineer. And i solve problems and write equations like this everyday. As i said in this spesific equasion the 2 is part of whatever is inside the parenthesis and you cant split it up. that means 2(3) must be 6 before you cant start solving the rest of the equasion. I will not explain somehing thats in every math book ever made.

>>

>>701155474

this guy is right

>>

>>701130084

Haha theres cum on those condoms

>spider webs

>>

>>701155379

wutwutwutwutwutwut,read yourself

>>

>>701155565

Every single computational algebra system says 58, PEMDAS says 58, fundamental algebra skills say 58.

Who do we trust here?

>>

>>701155898

36/6=6+4???

Are you sure?

>>

>>701155565

>I solve equations like this every day

why the fuck are you doing 7th grade math every day?

>>

>>701130078

...but you just said parenthesis first

>>

>>701156012

Me!

I have a big sausage! And that's all!

>>

>https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=6%5E2%2F2(3)%2B4

>>

>>701156012

>PEMDAS says 58

Does it?

>>701155474

>>701155379

>>701154992

>>

>>701129588

Oh fuck off anon

Now im gonna remember that shit instead of the rules

>>

>>701156012

trust whoever you want. I gave you the correct answer and its 6. If you want confirmation on that i suggest you pick up a math book.

Or you can just continue here arguing with retards

>>

>>701156231

Parenthesis = (3) = 3

Exponents = 6^2 = 36

Mult/Div = 36 / 2 = 18

Mult/Div = 18 * 3 = 54

Add/Sub = 54 + 4 = 58

58 WOW!

>>701156314

>It's 6

Have fun lying about being an engineer on the internet kek

>>

>>701129481

It'd still be 10.

36÷2x3+4

Do multiplication first which gives us

36÷ 6+4

Which is 6+4 equalling 10. So regardless of whether this whole "true parenthesis" bullshit is legit or not, you get 10 either way.

>>

>>701156045

What he meant was

36/6=6 (Plug into equation) 6+4=10

I really hope your not actually stupid enough to think he meant anything else

>>

>>701156569

Parenthesis is 2(3).

Not only what is inside the parenthesis. But whatever is next to it is counted to be a part of it.

>>

>>701156582

>He think PEMDAS literally means do multiplication first

Holy fuck you're all subhuman retards

>>

>>701156761

>But whatever is next to it is counted to be a part of it

lol

>>

>>701156569

6^2 / 2(3)+4

3*1=3

>this is where your retard happens

6^2 / 23 + 4

>Empty spaces in math are filled with multiplication and usually covered in parenthesis to prevent this level of autism

6^2 / 2(3) >so it's seperated

>follow PEMDAS

10

You'd be right if it was

6^2 / 2• 1(3) + 4

>But it's not and you just look retarded

>>

>>701154116

Do you do anything involving math for living, or getting some sort of degree involving math

>>

>>701156761

Are you actually retarded, or just fucking with us?

Rewrite it as 2 x 3 instead of 2(3) and tell me if your head explodes or not

>>

>>701127457

10

do brackets, then powers then division

then addition

DO IT IN THE ORDER WITH THE MOST POWERFUL MATHS FIRST

FOR FUCKS SAKE

>>

>>701157563

>outside number is multiplied by the parenthesis and is considered part

>>

>>701129885

This

It is always this.

Maybe if you niggers use common core you'll get 58

But if you use common core, guess we'll laugh at you.

Anyone that uses maths for a living

>>

>>701155565

I hope to god your lying because you are so wrong

>>

>>701130344

You don't actually think this do you?

>>

>>701157680

operations in brackets. the 2 on the outside is multiplication brosky.

6*6=36

36/2= 18

18*3=54

54+4=58

>>

>>701127457

Dear internet:

There is something call Wolfram Alpha, it's better at this than you could ever hope to be.

The answer is 58. Any other reply is wrong.

Thread images: 34

Thread DB ID: 75267

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.

This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.

If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.