>>701121617 I doesn't matter fam. She is not going to be able to function clearly in the next 8 years. I doubt she even has a healthy 4 years in her. Fuck it. Even if she wins, she will deteriorate to shit quickly.
>>701122466 Hillary's IQ is probably in the 105-110 range in case you couldn't tell. Barely above average. Trump is the mental equivalent of a sixth grader. The fact that he has a legitimate chance of beating her is pretty hilarious and embarrassing for her
>>701122770 well, maybe it's slightly higher, going out of my way to not paint a very impressive picture of her because if you accidentally acknowledge that hillary might be an above average human being in some respects will get the conspiracy nuts all riled up.
maybe she's around 120, who really knows. she's by no means a genius though
She failed the DC bar exam, was a lackluster Senator (a job she got as a gift from Bill Clinton), and was criminally incompetent as Secretary of State. Her only honest achievement in life seems to have been getting a child rapist she knew to be guilty acquitted, and then laughing about it.
>>701121363 Hillary can barely stand, and Trump's a 70 year-old fat fuck with the mind of a toddler.
This is what happens when you keep nominating old farts for the seat of presidency. We need someone who isn't a Baby Boomer, and we should do the same for the Congressional elections (which actually matter more).
>>701123303 >Because they just hand out MBAs and fortunes to anyone who asks, you know.
He only has a bachelors in economics. His level of education is equal to mine, and I'm still progressing lmao.
His dad legitimately did just hand out a fortune to him, whether you believe it was a million dollars or far more than that. The "great businessman" thing is a total myth, as he would have made many times more money just investing it all into the S&P stock market index.
>She failed the DC bar exam
Yes, and then passed the bar later in some other state (Arkansas or Illinois iirc). Which makes her more educated than Trump already. Not sure how this is supposed to speak to her intelligence, because having a >120 IQ doesn't guarantee that one will pass an exam that requires hours upon hours of studying and memorization.
>Her only honest achievement in life seems to have been getting a child rapist she knew to be guilty acquitted, and then laughing about it.
Yep, she's an evil witch, and probably a worse human being than Trump (it's hilarious how people don't understand lawyers are SUPPOSED to defend everyone, even rapists, to the best of their ability though).
>was a lackluster Senator (a job she got as a gift from Bill Clinton)
>>701124194 she has a ton of money and spent a lot of it in pretend online friending, buying the media, buying everyone else, making deals with people not to tell the truth, killing those that won't make a deal, and hiring lots of shills to come on sites like 4chan and spread falsehoods and pretend to like her
the sad thing is there are some (though very few) on 4chan who are actually would vote for her willfully and who actually aren't getting paid
those sad mind controlled fuckers need to give up their 4chan card
>>701124675 Holy fuck, are you literally that fucking dumb?
Hillary would stand no chance in any nation here in Europe you dumb Amerifag.
We've already had it with the likes of Merkel. No offense to women, but they make exceedingly poor leaders. Legislators, no problem. Just not designed for leadership.
Brexit much? Think the britfags wanting away and no more immigration and bs isn't exactly the same thing Trump has been preaching for years?
You have no clue what you speak of. We would fucking LOVE to have TRUMP anywhere here in Europe and he is mostly considered a bit of a hero for at least being an outsider and spending his own money. What we hate is institutional politics and Wall Street control, no matter what flavor.
You are a complete fucking dumbass confirmed for literally saying that Hillary would beat Trump at all in any other Western Nation. She would have been imprisoned long ago throughout most European nations and that is just a fact.
You Amerifags look stupid as fuck to the rest of us and complete hypocrits about your laws and rights when you let someone like that go free, let alone elect her as your leader.
Good luck getting any respect ever again in the rest of the world after you put her up as your leader.
>>701125212 not him but . . . m00t posted in several threads years ago the makeup of 4chan according to the advertisers he was wooing and you could not be more wrong everyone knows 4chan is full of mostly conservatives but nobody realized how much
according to what m00t posted it is overwhelmingly (87.3%) white conservative suburban heterosexual males 18-40
not sure what 4chan you've been on redditor but 4chan has always been way conservative
fyi, i've been one of the few liberals here and despite being well over 40 now, i am a berniefag through and through and will likely be throwing my vote to trump just cuz voting for anybody but trump does not hurt hillary and send a message to her and the dnc not giving up my voice to her and the establishment and won't be silenced
youre fucking mentally inept or 16 years old. On an image board and actually think you know something about the US? Shut your fucking mouth when you talk about us. Its not a mentality you unaware faglord. These are the IDEOLOGIES of the USA. We NEED strong borders and population accountability, we NEEd jobs via >>>infrastructure building or companies STAYING here. So fuck off, dumb mother fucker and learn something.
Hillary is burning though money like a forest fire Trumps not spent much money at all, a super pac spent money for some ads but hillary is 100 mil in ads between here and and super pac. Trumps only spent a few million
>>701121363 I hope so, because the other option is absolute shit. Seriously, how the fuck did we end up with trump as a candidate? Did we all forget he was a reality tv show clown? This country is done. Eventually you retards will elect a fuhrer type president and set america back a hundred years. If not Trump, some other idiot will arise saying more outrageous claims and talk about "the good old days" and "make america great again"...you will all fall for it again. This is a serious problem, when any moron can become president.
>>701125909 Same here and I'm with you. I won't shame you with my IQ but I am pro Trump and well above genius level. I'm not a true Republican but fyi, statistically, Republicans have always been significantly more intelligent than Democrats, despite the nonsense some of the ill-informed peddle around here. Of course, anyone who has been on the planet long enough to actually figure out how things work knows this already.
I'm a little bit racist, but I don't believe anyone isn't and anyone who claims not to be is a liar and not in touch with reality. My vote has nothing to do with race though. It has to do with corporate America buying the presidency again and frankly, me being able to live with myself and not screwing over my grandkids.
Trump's failure will be so YUGE, the very foundation the the Republican Party will crumble with the weight of his failure.
Trump is so horrible, the GOP now thinking they might be decimated in both houses as well.
If that happens, and the Dems flood the SCOTUS with as many Liberal judges as possible, it will fundamentally change the face of the US.
Watch all those fuckers trying to erode Roe V. Wade get a swift kick in the ass. Finally, reproductive rights will become the sole purview of women only.
>>701118213 Shes short and needs a step to get into a vehicle? Is that your best evidence she's not healthy? JFK used a back brace throughout his Presidency. FDR was almost NEVER shown in his wheelchair
BTW, the reason she needs a step is the floor of the vehicle is quite high due to the energy absorbing armor in the bottom of the vehicle. Its just under 10 inches thick. I know someone who helped make it. The glass is laminated plastic and fused silica. Its tested with .50 cal rounds
>>701126577 What we need is exactly a fuhrer type president to take back the country from the apes and special interests. You are just here throwing up all this bland rhetoric with no real argument to back it up.
America needs an iron fist to deal with the problems its facing or its' going to quickly become a third world shithole
>>701125530 >Hillary would stand no chance in any nation here in Europe you dumb Amerifag.
Lmao, I AM from Europe you fucking cretin
>We've already had it with the likes of Merkel. No offense to women, but they make exceedingly poor leaders.
Right, yet you voted in Merkel. How is this supposed to help your argument? Are you trying to suggest that this was a one time thing and now the Germans have decided en masse that it'll never happen again? Don't be fucking delusional, idiot.
>Brexit much? Think the britfags wanting away and no more immigration and bs isn't exactly the same thing Trump has been preaching for years?
They won by such a slim margin that I would argue that if you took Brexit and added a buffoon with the vocabulary of a middle schooler to the forefront of it, they would clearly have lost. Which is basically what Trump represents in the US. Nigel Farage is at least an intelligent human being.
>You have no clue what you speak of. We would fucking LOVE to have TRUMP anywhere here in Europe
Again, hate to say it, but I'm from Europe so I won't fall for this idiocy. Here in the Netherlands the public sentiment is very obvious, we're more liberal than the US, we HATE guns and think second amendment people are idiots, we value intelligence more highly and have less patience for crazy antics in what's supposed to be a serious system.
>She would have been imprisoned long ago throughout most European nations and that is just a fact.
Perhaps, but if she hadn't been and was running for president, she'd beat Trump easily. Trump wouldn't have had a chance of beating the other GOP candidates here.
It's hilarious how your entire argument relies on me being from the US and not knowing what's what inside Europe right now. Joke's on you, fucking retard. Get fucking annihilated.
>>701126618 Amazing how so many posters in this thread are putting Hawking to shame with their super genius IQs. I mean the rate is less than 1 in 36,000 who'd have thought so many would be posting on this particular thread
>>701127361 ikr amerifags prolly think they are "voting" yet they watched that bernie guy get denied a chance without a fair shake some system they got sailed away years ago fags took over what was once a strong murrica now laughing stock
>>701127479 Sorry friend. I am telling the truth, though I doubt you would believe it. Hawking is a bright guy, no question, but he is not the only one and frankly he is not even close to some of us. In his field he is a giant though and despite recent gaffes, I still hold to that.
>>701124321 >Loren mvesting n the s&p That's actually a lie. The market has fluctuated so much he would have lost the majority of it. Comparing current numbers and numbers 30 years ago without looking at what happened inbetween is pure propaganda.
>>701127693 We have at least 7 states in this election that aren't pre decided on who their electoral college votes go to. Don't you think 7/50 is pretty good for a democracy? I can't tell because I went to American schools :(
Yeah. I said "Europe is a country", not "any other western country". Europe kinda consists of countries you absolute autist, and Trump wouldn't win in any country west of Hungary.
We simply don't like rednecks over here, would NEVER vote for someone who is pro-life in 2016, hate guns, hate blatantly stupid people, would never want to pull out of NATO, etc.
Here in the Netherlands we have a candidate who's basically Trump without the lack of intelligence, google Geert Wilders. He's probably not even going to make it into the cabinet, because people who vote for any other party want absolutely nothing to do with him.
This is basically a more Europe-friendly, more informed Trump, and he's still being painted as some crazy caricature over here.
Also, couldn't help but notice you failed to respond to any of my arguments? Isn't that weird.
>>701128175 Nope. lrn2read "He" didn't say anything like that. moot did though and he said it was widely known from all the advertising studies that were cited. I remember that too and somewhere probably have at least one of those threads saved. This should honestly be no surprise to anyone that 4chan is in fact highly conservative. Liberals rarely come here, except during any Hillary campaign as we all know, and they are paid to come here as on many website forums and post disinformation. Liberals last about 3 seconds here before they are offended and run off puking or crying.
FYI liberals also don't hunt much, don't cage fight, don't go to the gun range, don't WWE, don't tip, don't _____, etc.
Maybe go out in the world once in awhile and actually see what is around you without those rose-colored glasses on.
Everybody knows anyone around here pumping the Hillary bagpipe is a shill. The only way one doesn't know this is if they are a newfag.
>>701128863 >They won by such a slim margin that I would argue that if you took Brexit and added a buffoon with the vocabulary of a middle schooler to the forefront of it, they would clearly have lost.
Already responded to it, moron. This is arguably the most nationalistic country in western Europe too. Farage would take a fat shit on Trump and yet he could only BARELY win (which I'm actually happy about, in case you were confusing me for some ultra leftist)
>>701127466 >We are more liberal than the US Has sharia-controlled zones. >We hate guns Read: I am an entitled millenial that has lived under a dome all my life. I hate my parents, they got me a mercedes instead of BMW, hurr durr. >think second amendment people are idiots Second amendment means freedom of private ownership of potentially dangerous items. How can you say you are more liberal than the US and then say you're against freedom in the next sentence? >we value intelligence And you prove it by being dumb, ignorant and aggressive. >Get fucking annihilated.
Wow, we got a badass over here.
On an unrelated note, have you finished preparing for school?
>>701128598 wall street has always feared trump and he has repeatedly said he will dismantle their stranglehold on america anybody who has had their house in foreclosure or has a loved one oppressed by jewbank knows this
also, he is literally only spending his own money who else has ever done that? he is beholden to no one
>>701129375 He says a lot of things that are realistic shit. Hurrrrrdurrrr gonna build a wall and make Mexico pay for it. lol Mexico will tell us to go fuck ourselves. And this wall is going to be magical so you cannot tunnel under it nor climb over it.
lol He is a used car salesmen. The fact he got this far shows the republican party is infected with republitards.
>>701128381 Lol. That has nothing to do with his argument. Whether Hillary, her Establishment/DNC/Wall Street bought 1, 10 or all 50 states is the point as you shouldn't be able to buy any of them. You shouldn't be able to just destroy thousands of votes in Brooklyn for Bernie. You shouldn't have a head of the DNC who backed Hillary and was her appointed shill and who wrecked what we all know was a far stronger backing for Bernie (all you had to do was go to his rally and compare it to the Hillary rallies). You shouldn't be able to constantly commit felonies like Hillary and never even get tried in a court of law for them.
She is a career politician. Period. She is all that is wrong with America.
How does someone with I high IQ admit to accepting a position that is so basically flawed on a philosophical level? If you can accept that skin color is an arbitrary condition, in no way related to one's intelligence or ability, the same way that eye color or hair color is not, then how do you sustain that level of thought? If it's just that you know that a racist position would be utterly decimated in a serious argument and don't care, why not?
Should not an intelligent man or woman dismiss ideas that don't stand up to basic logic? I agree that everyone is racist on some level, and that being racist is a natural condition, but your mind should be able to act as a mediator between the basic impulses of distrust or anger or spite that might trigger when you interact with a person of a race you are uncomfortable with - to say, "I know I feel this way, but it is not fair to assume this person is the caricature that I have constructed of this race."
I know that I'm wasting my breath here, and even anyone who shares my opinions would probably not respond or troll or whatever, but if you seriously think that having a high IQ justifies being racist or excuses some racist tendency, then you're willfully being dumb.
This >>701128704 is correct. Murrica, home of the sheeple and spineless has-beens who used to invent and kickass around the world. Now run by gays, genderwutthefucks, women, and the weak, with everyone with half a spine walking on pins and needles.
You weak. Your future children are begging you not to bring them into this world as our slaves.
>>701129375 He has said a lot of things that aren't true first of all and he is wall street incarnate. He even bragged to being part of the fucking system that buys politicians! He is as insider as it gets.
>>701129985 >How does someone with I high IQ admit to accepting a position that is so basically flawed on a philosophical level?
You admit the existence of IQ, which means difference among people. And you use that to deny any and all possible differences between groups of people. lol
How are we able to tell each race apart if the do not exist? >If you can accept that skin color is an arbitrary condition, in no way related to one's intelligence or ability, the same way that eye color or hair color is not, then how do you sustain that level of thought?
Skin color is a possible indicator, like a dick is a pretty good indicator that someone is a male. If someone has a dick he likes women, and because that statement is correct in more than 98% of all cases, it is arbitrarily correct.
There are exceptions, but they are just that. Exceptions.
Admitting that there are objectively differences between groups of people based on genetics is not being racist. Racist is discriminating against said people solely based on that fact.
African blacks have NEVER developed past the tribal phase of society. There aren't even any traces of civilization on the whole sub-saharan africa.
Why is that? There wasnt any exploitation of those parts in 500 bc, and in those times asia and europe had sprawling, advanced civilisations.
Black people are still people, and should be treated as such. But on a racial level, they are nowhere near other races.
>>701130747 nah, just reality chum vote trump if you want to send a message to the establishment, wall street and the dnc that you will not be silenced if you don't and she gets in, you will embolden her and her masters to do it next time that simple
The US media HARDLY "leans far left".. (They don't really support Democrats, either, if you look at the data.)
They are corporate, first and foremost. They want to sell clicks and spots. That's what the right-wingers can't wrap their brain around. The MSM is far more bowing to corporate interests than "controlled by the democrats" or liberals, FFS.
>2008 >retarded liberals refuse to vote for McCain because they think he's too old and unhealthy >2016 >retarded liberals want an old, unhealthy man as their president, but he sells out so they'll pick the old, unhealthy woman who he sold out to instead
"Hey, look at me, I wear a rope bracelet and Oakleys like they do in the SEALs. I'm tough, and I'm going to pretend I'm in the Navy... I'm also going to make Hillary look bad because I wastch Fox 'news'"
>>701132132 Obama was actually better than McCain and there was literally no reason at all to believe he wouldn't be a good president before he was elected.
As for 2016, some retarded millenials still want an old, unintelligent man to be the president, but most of them prefer the creepy old lady who might randomly die (not necessarily a bad thing, considering nearly everyone not called Trump would be an upgrade)
>>701132958 read what I'm saying my thick friend, I said there was no reason to THINK he wouldn't be a good president BEFORE he was elected. He ended up being pretty mediocre but certainly not a disaster. Maybe slightly worse than McCain would've been, but no signs pointed at that beforehand
Yeah, he loaned his own money to the campaign at a ridiculous rate, so he can now collect the money supporters gave him and pay himself back very generously. Why do you think Huckabee and Cruz and those assholes that have no chance of winning keep running? Politics are a great scheme for making the rich richer.
>>701134903 >Race relations in this nation are worse now than they have been in 50 years, fuck him for that alone.
You do understand that not everything that happens in a country has been ordered by the president, right? If you want to make this argument you're going to have to link something Obama did (or didn't do) to a deterioration of race relations. If you don't understand that's necessary then this is probably not a discussion worth having.
>>701121363 I'm not American so I don't really care for the elections tbh, but just look at pictures of the before and after of Obama in office. Being in office is stressful and has made Obama look old. If Hilary can't handle stress now along with other medical issues then how the hell is she going to make it the 4 terms? If she gets in office we'll be looking at the before and after pictures of her, except the after will be her corpse. From what I see, neither candidate will hold it together. Trump will get a reality check, Hilary just won't be able to make it, medically. If I were American, I'd vote a third party candidate.
>>701135852 Bernie's crowds were even larger. The local news gave Hillary 3 minutes of coverage on the "hundreds" of people who showed up to her rally, then at the end said, "her opponent Senator Sanders also held a really today in Seattle."
It had over 20,000 people. Anyone saying that the media is attacking Hillary in any way is either a shill, or intellectually lives under a rock.
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.