Personalities of /b/:
Post your results.
Also, take the poll once you're done.
I was INFP
E-INTJ I tested so many times and always was on the tipping point of I and E. I get claustrophobic around other people if I am crowded. Not that I am drained of energy as most would say on the tests, just the urge to get the heck out of there to breath. I get along with people fine but am rather blunt, probably why some people like me, I don't sugar coat it. And many dont' see me as an ass because I dont try to be, I just be straight forward and honest so I get the respect. (and that is why I am the manager now)
Well, maybe not a teacher in the traditional sense, but we definitely make great leaders.
T- Turbulent: You lack self-esteem and confidence in who you are. You might know yourself, but you don't act in it.
A-Assertive: Basically the opposite. You have high confidence and self-esteem.
This test is stupid and outdated, you should see the one advertisers use on you.
Visionary reporting in fam
i'm so fuckin brilliant that all i do is sit on /b/ and create new "reply to this post or you're mom will die in her sleep tonioght" meme's all night
The personality of The Wicked Eye would be too much for you mortals to handle!
>mfw i don't want INTJ
>mfw i'm ENTP and happy
>T- Turbulent: You lack self-esteem and confidence in who you are. You might know yourself, but you don't act in it.
>A-Assertive: Basically the opposite. You have high confidence and self-esteem.
What if it shows both letters?
You're welcome. It's sorta the red headed step child of personality, little known and talked about. It has been getting renewed interest over the past several years because it's a really common trait.
Honestly, I took the Myers-Briggs personality test several times, and each time I got the INTJ. When I was reading the description and it said we made up 2% of the population.The fact that there are so many people claiming to be INTJs, simply means there are a lot of people who wish they were INTJs simply because of the very brief and simple description the picture OP used.
Love this site, used it alot two years ago for a psych class. Anyway I've been ENTP every time I test. Until tonight. For the first time ever I got a different result (i've tried bullshitting it before never works). I've been in a relationship with this girl and I think she is part of why I'm now an ENFP. Maybe someone can shed some light on how relationships effect personality?
>Yeah I'm not really understanding why people are wanting INTJ so bad.
>All starting with (I) mean introverted
>Most of the time having good social skills is a plus
>Meaning having an (I) is a net negitive
Are you saying they're telling the truth, or that each one of them is a wanna-be. Cause if they were telling the truth, there would be a lot of Mark Zuckerburgs, Friedrich Nietzsches, Karl Marxs, Ayn Rands, and a whole lot more geniuses. Especially for a page dedicated to boobs.
Take a look at the people with our personality type. We are also one of the rarest personality types. I think that points to us generally being smarter and more inquisitive than most people.
I know, I was the same way. I always thought of myself as some edgy, cold-hearted person, but she showed I was the exact opposite, and that it was just repressed through bad life experiences. Never looked back since.
you are more assertive, where as i am a -T so i am a more turbulent of a personality, i plan less and kinda go with the flow more when it comes to decision making and ability.
If any are a "master race" they would be.
Typically those are the ones that end up being
Hitler was likely ENTJ
you see for me it depends on the mood i am in, if im having a shit day im not gonna deal with other peoples incompetence and let them slow me down whereas if im having a good day ill let people make their mistakes and learn from them.
Every time. Got Debater once when drunk.. But well who isn't
Amazing. INTP proving their inability to pick up on social cues and project their insecurities at every turn. If you'll take the time to reread my post, you'll see that at no point did I imply that any phenotype is superior or inferior to any other, quite the contrary. I was pointing out how delusional and pretentious such a statement is. However, if you want me to go into common INTP personality flaws, I will glady:
-INTP fags have no personality; they're basically computer programs barely capable of socializing with actual people. This goes hand in hand with the fact that they are disproportionately autistic and prone to aspie behavior.
I can list more if you like
We started out as long-distance best friends, turned into deep and romantic lovers, then went back to best friends.
It hurt when we broke up. Only reason we broke up is that we couldn't wait 2 more years to see each other. She was still in high school, and I was still in college. We still have strong feelings of love for each other though, just a different sort of love now.
>Not really saying any are bad per se
It's just that if you define a master race, as running shit then it would have to be one with an (E) since it would require at least some leadership ability.
I've taken it a few times and have always gotten the Architect.
Doesn't really seem like a good fit aside from the traits that make me hate everyone and want to be alone, all the shit about being smart doesn't fit me.
Funnily the only time I've got something different was when I was a little dude weed and took the test... of course I got the most Liberal ass shit ever, INFP.
1. I meant that I was an INTJ. You "Only INTJ are worse than you chumps". So yeah, you did imply that there was inferiority between the phenotypes.
3. Who really is the one who can't pick up social cues? I said "I was referring to the INTJ type." but you kept on talking about the INTP type.
When did I say anything negative about you?
is that why I'm so autistic
should I get checked out
Just found out that I'm INTP lol. It says, literally, that I have "inventiveness and creativity" also a "unique perspective and vigorous intellect."
I feel like shit every day, This test is wrooong.
I think I'm the olny one here atm
I like looking around 4chan there's alot of stuff to see and learn about everything regardless if it's true or not. It's a fun experience
I would definitely assume that 4chan is more prone to introverts
INFP and I got a -A/-T at the end. Whatever that means
ISTJ-A. I think most neck beards are INTJ because those are the answers that match the most closely with what they "want" to be, not what they actually are. The answers are predisposed to their imagined character type, not reality.
thats very enfp of you. but i am too, i totally get it.
i come here to see how people think about different things. also i like to make posts about my ideas and see how people take it.
INTP, I take the test a lot. Try to answer accurately. I actually have autism. So it makes sense.
This thing from year to year can't decide whether I'm INFP or ISFP. I think I was INFP growing up as a kid then some shit happened and now I'm ever so slightly more ISFP.
81% Turbulent, fuck me in the anus.
You guys do realize that the meyers brigg's test is based on pseudo-science, right? Have fun with your quiz, but realize that it's as valid as a "which harry potter character are you?" quiz you find on FB.
I remember taking this a year or 2 ago. I was INFP. seemed pretty reasonable. supposedly we get into periods where we don't want to interact with people for a long time, and then suddenly we'll snap back and want to be with people, well the people we like.
In summary, it appears that the MBTI does not conform to many of the basic standards expected of psychological tests. Many very specific predictions about the MBTI have not been confirmed or have been proved wrong. There is no obvious evidence that there are 16 unique categories in which all people can be placed. There is no evidence that scores generated by the MBTI reflect the stable and unchanging personality traits that are claimed to be measured. Finally, there is no evidence that the MBTI measures anything of value.
INTPs couldn't make these connections if they thought they knew it all – they are highly receptive to alternate theories, so long as they're supported by logic and facts. In more subjective matters like social norms and traditions, INTPs are usually fairly liberal, with a "none of my business" sort of attitude – peoples' ideas are what matter.
^sounds like me
Shit I was the only ESTJ...
Also ESTJ reporting in, looks like I'm the only one in this thread.
No actually I'm >>700758966
And I've read the book.
Jung is a fraud, just like Freud
MBTI personality profiles are derivatives of Jun's nonsense and have NO backing in modern psychology.
Good job falling for the scam, like the rest of the idiots in this thread
It's fine. I stress about going to sleep. I feel like I'm going to wake up as another person so I don't want the day to end.
>Turbulent individuals are self-conscious and sensitive to stress.
>They are likely to experience a wide range of emotions and to be
>success-driven, perfectionistic and eager to improve.
The difference, you cretinous imbecile, is that everyone in magic/astrology threads knows it's a fantasy, whereas the vast majority posting in MTBI personality type threads think this is actually a valid metric of personality.
I agree the MBTI is a scam and you are right the profiles are derivatives of Jungs work, but the original theories are still valid today, theres a reason why you need 3+ years of schooling to practice jungian psychology.
This is like saying that Freud has been redeemed because modern research shows that subconscious processes in the brain turned out to be dominant factors in human cognition after all. Of course, it doesn't redeem him because he was wrong about everything else than this most general supposition, including the details of said processes and how they relate to consciousness.
Are you retarded? Every single criticism in the list is backed by citations. Why shouldn't I use the convenient aggregate of summaries of all of these points that the page provides?
That's like me correcting you when you say the earth is flat and then saying should provide self constructed arguments for that, instead of me pointing to a collection of scientific facts where each point is backed by citations.
Every criticism point in the massive list I linked to is backed by citations. Are you saying I should duplicate a huge amount of work published by a bunch of psychologists? You fucking tool
I don't think you understand. The personality theory from Jung was a smaller part to larger tapestry of his overall psychology. The MBTI was created to further refine the ideas of type Jung put forth.
Because they read on the news or heard from their teacher that wikipedia is unreliable because anyone can edit it.
Of course, it _is_ unreliable; that's why you follow the fucking citations. It's use isn't in establishing reliability; it's use is in being an index to information from reliable sources. Of course, that's lost on the tards posting here
I don't dismiss wikipedia as a valid source of information, I dismiss the person linking a wikipedia article as a person with a valid opinion because they're obviously unable to construct their own with their own research from multiple sources and then draw their own educated conclusion.
nobody cares that it doesn't mean anything, they just like to use it like a horoscope because kids today are literally brain dead faggots.
brain dead faggots that like things like horoscopes and funky new styles. They're so fucking usless that the only thing they're good for is exploiting them with their shitty app trends and harvest all their personal data so you can pretty much predict their entire life.
It says that the dimensions are invalid, for the reasons listed. That is, S-N, T-F, etc. are as a collection not valid qualifiers of personality. Thus, any personality profile composed of these is invalid.
In summary, it appears that the MBTI does not conform to many of the basic standards expected of psychological tests. Many very specific predictions about the MBTI have not been confirmed or have been proved wrong. There is no obvious evidence that there are 16 unique categories in which all people can be placed. There is no evidence that scores generated by the MBTI reflect the stable and unchanging personality traits that are claimed to be measured. Finally, there is no evidence that the MBTI measures anything of value..
Don't forget about the part where they found that it's an invalid factorization of personality as they found six factors rather than just four when a proper statistical analysis was done.
MBTI is the sheerest garbage