go ahead /b/ answer it
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
go ahead /b/
answer it
2,3,1
>>699892728
2-3-1
2, 1, 3
>>699892827
>>699892850
/thread
>>699892728
2-2-2
fuck the police
3 goes first, no yield sign.
I can't see the difference between the yield signs on 2 and 1 but 2 should go second because they are not changing lanes, and then 3 goes because they are having to turn
This is how it is in my state
> implying /b/ is old enough to drive
312
>>699892728
They are all on the wrong side of the road wtf??????
>>699892827
>>699892850
>>699892866
No yield sign for 3 you morons
>>699892975
*321
321 car number 3 doesn't have a yield sign, car number 2 is already on the road, so number 1 has to yield into traffic
>>699892952
You can't be serious?
>>699893031
3 yields for right
>>699892866
1 has a yield sign, you stupid fuck...2 has right of way...then 3, then 1
>>699892728
2 3 and 1 all go at the same time and crash because fuck them and this nigger thread
3-2-1
3, 2, 1 you fucking morons
They go similtaeneously and the strong survive
>>699893031
thats not a yield sign for 2 you moron
>>699892952
2 doesnt have a yield sign. Yield signs are inverted.
>>699892728
231
>>699892728
It looks like 2,3,1 to me, but it also looks like 2 has a sign of a pikachu.
>>699892952
3 is crossing 2's path...2 has right of way. your state is fucking retarded
>>699893125
No it doesn't. The other two have posted yield signs and 3 doesn't, they do not have to yield.
>>699892728
2 is first, if 3 is not a faggot he should let 1 go before he does
>>699893091
no, stupid. 2-3-1
>>699893091
Are you retarded?
Car 2 is the only vehicle that is not deviating from its course, it is going straight ahead and the sign in front of him is an intersection sign.
>>699892728
What is 2s sign supposed to be? Looks like a hand puppet of a dog
>>699893031
Which is why he goes second you insufferable moron. Cars going straight always have the right away over a car that's turning. So car one goes first. Then car 3. Then car 2.
Literally fucking kill yourself because you obviously don't know how to drive.
its whoever the fuck gets to the stop first is it not?
321
to those who keep fucking saying 231 are retarded
>>699893272
2 does not have a yield sign. look at it again.
correct order is 2-3-1
321
>>699892952
Yeah, because when you're going straight ahead you stop for people who want to cut you off.
You are a fucking retard who's mum should of drowned you as a kid.
What is the sign on the bottom right below 2? Looks like a yield sign but not quite.
>>699892728
what's the sign of car 2? it looks like a sign for the Ministry of Funny Walks.
1-3-2
>>699893435
1 has a yield sign you fucktard...3 crosses 2's path...3 yields right of way to 2
correct order is 2-3-1
>>699893583
>>699893593
1 3 2 faggots
>>699893091
learn to right of way dumbass
also 2 isn't a yield sign.
>>699893688
yes, you're a faggot :)
>>699892728
2 goes first, as he's not crossing anyones line + has priority.
3 has to ceede priority to his right
213
1 comes first in the alphabet geniuses, then 2, then 3. That's the order. Get a brain, morans.
>>699892728
is this eaurop though? cus then the order is left one go 1st
>>699892827
>>699892850
this and these
WHere is the pokestop tho
>>699892728
In Canada it is 2,3,1
As a T-Junction the yield sign for 1 would simply be a stop sign.
2 is going straight on the main road and has the right of way over 1 and 3.
3 is making a turn from the main road and has right of way over 1.
1 is making a turn onto the main road and must wait until all other cars have passed.
You should post a 4 way stop question. Everyone gets those wrong because they post some antiquated shit about cardinal directions or direction based off the person who has the right of way.
>>699893815
\thread
>>699893836
Europe? Don't you see cars on the right lane?
>>699893655
Wanna know how I know that you're fucking retarded beyond any any possible doubt? That's exactly my methodology for supporting my position. So you're literally fighting with me while absolutely and totally agreeing with me. You goddamn autist.
3-2-1 morons
>>699894004
you can't read. :)
231
>>699892728
2, 3, 1. Right of way is governed by whether you need to cross someone elses lanes except when someone is waiting at a junction to a carriageway.
>Been driving 9 years.
>Only killed 608 people.
>>699894002
They might be in Europe and all three cars are making the same mistake of driving on the wrong side of the road.
>>699893792
no. yield sign > right goes first.
>>699892728
I'm gonna go with 2, 3, then 1.
2 because it is going straight and seems to be past the yeild sign already.
3 because it is turning left, is right of 1 and does not have a yeild sign.
Lastly 1 because it has a yeild sign.
2 3 1
>>699893916
In a four-way the car who gets there first goes first.
Assuming all four get there at the exact same time, then the car going straight goes first.
If two cars are going straight and are crossing one another's path, then the car on the right (based off the in-car perspective of the two straight moving cars) goes first.
After all straight cars go, then right turning cars go.
Then left turning cars.
>>699894002
>>699894141
only great britain drives on the left lane you uneducated non-europeans.
>>699894139
Also, I'm a Britbong, and among other things, we invented driving and even with your wonky lane selection in the US... the same rules apply.
>>699893655
>1 has a yield sign you fucktard
That isn't a yield sign and it isn't at the intersection. Yields are only ever placed on a merge into a larger road which isn't what is happening here.
If that is a yield sign next to 2, then 3 would go first. But I can't tell what it is, and I don't think an intersection exists like that.
Y all niggaZ posting on a troll thread
anyone who believes it is anything other than 2-3-1 is a fucking moron and should not be allowed to drive on any road
>>699892728
2 doesn't have a yeild sign. The sign shows that he has priority but that there is an oncoming intersection.
>>699892728
Whichever car im driving
>>699894384
In what fucking 3rd world shithole is that a sign?
>>699894373
you're either blind or stupid...which is it?
>>699894090
Apparently no you can't. The post which I responded too seems to be under the impression that car 3 goes first because there was no yield sign. I called him an idiot and said that's exactly the reason why it goes second. Then here you come in all your autistic glory crying about how I'm wrong because car there goes second.... After I literally just got done yelling at some fagot that exact thing.
Just face it you're developmentally retarded. Everyone here would be better off if you died.
>>699894377
It depends on the signs and those signs appear to be from some foreign fuckhole that the rest of us don't know about.
Since when have we used upside down yeld signs u morons. Its a warning of a hazard further up. Ffs kids
>>699892728
321 bruh. they got yield signs
>>699894475
LOL! i didn't mean to upset you.
correct order is 2-3-1. be less dumb. :)
>>699894311
Close. Right turning cars can move at the same time as straight moving cars as long as their paths don't cross.
>>699893455
Which stop? I don't see any stop signs.
>>699894373
It is a T intersection tho, which yeild is implied in the "leg" of the T. Either way it LOOKS like cars 1 and 2 have yeild signs.
>>699894232
It's not a yield sign, so it doesn't matter.
2 3 1
>>699892728
Okay faggots listen up.
Those two signs show that 2 and 3 are on a main road.
2 goes first because he is on the main road and driving straight
3 goes next because he is on the main road and turning into a minor street
1 has the lowest priority, being on a minor street, and has to wait for both of these fuckers, even if he was going straight
All in all,
Lrn2Drive Faggits.
>>699894470
Yield signs are triangles with a vertex on the bottom. The sign near 2 has an edge on the bottom. It is a generic warning sign like winding road or rockslide area, not a yield sign.
Don't feel bad, it was put there to confuse you.
>>699894458
idk but it is a sign in germany
>>699892728
I'm a driving instructor, and this is just basic imho.
1 got a yield sign, obviously, 2 got the sign, that 1 got a yield sign.
So its 2 - 3 - 1.
End of story, dont let any trolls get to your head boys.
>>699894458
France
>>699894886
Its actually a warning sign, that he's on the main road and 1 has a yield sign.
>>699894886
you still can't read. :)
i never said 2 has yield sign. i've been saying all along, correct order is 2-3-1. were you born stupid, or do you have to work at it?
>>699894752
You're right. It is a picture so the laws of physics don't apply.
Car 1 drives off into space
Car 2 submerges because it has its submergion lions
Car 3 keeps driving on the road because car 3 is a pussy
Anon misspells because anon don't give a fuck
>>699894698
Take a closer look, 2 doesn't have a yield sign. If you are confused, look up a picture of a yield sign and see how the sign at 2 looks different.
>>699892728
3,1,2 u fags
>>699894458
Like, all of Europe?
>>699893792
There is no stop signs for 2 or 3. Look at the pic again, only 1 has a yield sign. 2 and 3 are on a through traffic street.
2, 3, 1
>>699892827
Why are we still posting after this?
>>699895035
My bad, I just woke up and was thinking 1 as in the order they move.
>>699894698
2's sign just signals that he's on a main road, and 1 has to yield.
Yield signs are upside down.
3, 2+1. 2 and 1 can go simultaneously. If can't do it safely, then 3 2 1.
Laws aside,
Let's consider this from a rational perspective for most efficient outcome.
Assuming the cars are self-driving and all have access to the info of the directions the cars in sight are going in. Then the safest and fastest way for all cars would be:
2 & 1 going simultaneously since their courses don't overlap,
3 follows right after.
This will be the best possible solution in the near future where every car is self-driving.
>>699892827
Anyone who says otherwise needs to have their driving license revoked.
>>699893568
We have some of those on side streets here. T-intersection where the straightaways have stop signs but the one who'll have to turn doesn't.
>>699892728
2, 3, 1
>>699895437
you should not be behind the wheel :)
>>699894947
>im a driving instructor
got any proof boss?
>>699895040
2 is past that confusing sign already so it doesn't really matter, tho 2 has some pictograph on it while 1 looks to be just a triangle with no pictographs.
>Also, just noticed the positions of the triangles. 2 is "right side up"(big side on bottom, pointy thing on top) and pointy side down on 1. Not sure but I think 2 is a warning and 1 is a yeild.
I'm still going with 2, 3, then 1.
>>699892827
This is correct
>>699892728
2,3,1
>>699895437
>2 & 1 going simultaneously since their courses don't overlap,
i hope you're not driving without glasses.
>>699895429
2 is first.
See 90% of posts above
>>699892728
Cars 2 and 3 are on the priority (or right-of-way) road so they go first
car 2 goes straight so it goes before car 3
car 1 goes last, because he's not on the priority road
so it's 2-3-1
>>699895437
how the fuck don't 2 and 1 intersect you nigger?? are you literally blind?
>>699892728
Whoever is most American goes first because freedom.
>>699895437
>Courses dont everlap
Yes they do, they all do. That is why it is a question about right of way.
Talking about self driving cars the order would be 2, then 3 begins its turn before 2 is fully cleared of the intersection then 1 moves before 3 is clear.
Talking about general safety, it should be 2,1,3 because if there was a collision between 3 and 1 because 3 went early or the driver in that lane was not paying attention the collision would not be driver side.
>>699895701
Proof being, that i know basic signs and dont have to think to "solve" this "riddle"?
>>699892728
Me first; Good luck everybody else
2 1 3
you don't yield to people turning across your lane of traffic, all you new drivers out there.
>>699894384
>>699895078
What shitty retarded signs.
>Here's a sign that tells you you should drive as if this sign doesn't exist.
>Here's a sign that should have been a yield sign but we put the triangle on the wrong way so we painted it to be different and pretended it's different.
>>699895437
Nah nigga
It is 1 2 3
Learn2count
And if they were self-driving the biggest car goes first, survival of the biggest
>>699895855
what kind of driving instructor calls a test question a riddle?
>>699895887
you should not be behind the wheel :)
>>699895737
"confusing sign"?
see
>>699894384
>>699892728
2-3-1
2 has right of way as they are not breaking any flowing lanes of traffic. 3 is breaking 1 lane of traffic by leaving a continuous lane. 1 is leaving a non-continuous lane and breaking 2 lanes as so must give way to all.
>>699895737
>past that confusing sign already
Exactly, it isn't at the intersection so it doesn't affect traffic through the intersection directly.
In Canada those signs are generic warnings about the terrain but some people here are saying that specific sign is an indicator that the adjoining road in the junction has a yield. We don't have those because T-Junctions are always at least a 1 way stop for the adjoining road or assumed to be a yield.
2,3,1 is correct in north america, I was just pointing out that 2 doesn't have a yield, that warning sign is there to see if the person taking the test is confused about road signs.
>>699895919
Americano detectero.
Its just a simple sign, telling 2 that 1 has to yield. Thats all.
>>699896008
OPs post is not as detailed as it could be, either way I don't see how that photo aids anyone in determining what is on the signs in OPs post.
I'm not sure if you are just fucking with me or not. Are we in disagreement about the order i stated of 2-3-1?
>>699895962
Are you disagreeing with me?
>>699896270
Which would already be implied by the fact that 2 has no yield or stop sign.
It is a redundancy.
>>699896338
We're not disagreeing on the order. The sign on the left is Driver 2's sign. Just saying its a basic sign, thats all.
>>699896270
>Its just a simple sign, telling 2 that 1 has to yield. Thats all.
>>Here's a sign that tells you you should drive as if this sign doesn't exist.
>>699893815
>1 comes first in the alphabet
Top kek
>>699896368
No, you got the order right. I just want to know why you would call a test question a riddle, that some fucked up shit and I want to know what other idiosyncrasies you have that might infuriate your co-workers.
>>699895923
I'm (you)ing myself
>biggest car goes first
This is how the roads should work. All you tiny car driving motherfuckers can wait while I burn a galon taking off.
>>699894698
the leg of the T doesn't always cede right-of-way. in Brussels (and maybe the rest of Belgium), the T has the RoW because they assume that it will help alleviate a buildup entering the through street. what's more fucked up, is that it only applies to 2-lane through streets.
>>699896368
you are not a driving instructor
>>699892728
2, 3, 1
>>699896370
2 doesnt know if 1 got a yield sign or not, so if he didnt have that particular sign, he would actually be required to slow down at the intersection, cuz 1 would have the favor of driving first, since its a normal intersection and 1 is to the right of 2. (all without considering 3)
>>699896671
Except motorcycles, they should be able to weave through traffic as needed to get through quicker because bikes are awesome.
>>699896537
Aw, icic. Yeah, I didn't really look at the photo that well.
>>699893904
2 doesn't have a yield sign, idiots.
It's a fucking side road warning sign. Notice how the triangle is not upside-down like a yield sign.
The proper order IS 2, 3, 1. 2 goes first, because it's a straight line with NO traffic guidelines, there's no yield, no stop, no nothing.
3 goes second, because 1 has to yield to all traffic and 2 can go straight freely. 3 is turning, and must stop and indicate to turn.
1 goes last, because it's yielding.
>>699896661
Does it make a difference?
>>699896907
exactly.
>>699896777
>he would actually be required to slow down at the intersection
Not here. I think this is a regional problem. The leg of the T is always a yield or a stop which means 2 doesn't need to worry about the signing 1 has.
Because 2 has no yield or stop and is traveling in a straight line, they have the right of way and don't need to be told that 1 doesn't have the right of way.
>>699895919
It's just a warning sign. By that logic, you might as well throw out signs that warn about sharp turns, S-turns, tunnels etc. None are needed if the driver pays attention to the road and the surroundings, after all.
>>699896550
Its a simple sign so that 2 knows 1 has to yield, otherwise he'd be required to slow down, cuz its a normal intersection when 1 doesnt have the yield sign.
Y'all so confused by 2's sign?
>>699896270
Which makes it redundant because both 2 and 1 should already know that as a basic rule of T-Intersections.
>>699896780
Well, as long as they stay out of the big dicks, I mean trucks, way. Yes. Also, they make cool sounds. Just speed around of what ever is in your way and try to not get hurt or it is your fault.
>>699896780
It wouldn't be as cool if you gave them permission, though.
>>699897012
But drivers don't. People can be stupid sometimes, which is why there are so many signs.
>>699896947
Yes, I want to hear work stories about how you bring license applicants to your auto-conveyance and tell them about the proper placement of their hands on the direction disk.
Do you have a booming speech of condemnation when they fail a riddle?
>>699897006
Is it?
There's no special rules around here considering "T-Intersectoin", if 1 didnt have that yield sign it would be a normal intersection around here.
Thats an interesting fact.
Also,
>>699897040
should read it.
>>699897183
We wont right it down on paper, it will be an unwritten rule which sounds way better.
>>699897216
Captain redundant, to the rescue!
>>699897233
...that they're fuckwits who can't drive?
>>699897022
Because even without that sign, he already knows 1 has to give way. It's an inherent rule of T-Intersections. The sign is completely redundant and diverting the drivers attention by telling him what everyone there already knows.
>>699897372
nonono, its got to be like "ye have verily failed the riddle of yield. You have but one last try before your soul is mine."
>>699897492
refer to
>>699897286
and
>>699897006
>>699892728
2-3-1
>>699897534
So, you finally got me by the balls and came to the conclusion, that my native language isnt english?
Thats so gay
>>699897324
I know you are but what am I?
>>699892728
CERU my nigga
>>699897286
There is one other exception here. In rural areas there is sometimes a T or 4way that has a flashing yellow light hung in the middle. That is an all way yield that means you can simply keep going without stopping if no one else is near and you treat it as a normal intersection if you arrive at the same time as someone else.
In practice there are very few yield signs here and they are almost always used on a curved turn lane that merges into traffic without a merging lane.
>>699897492
the yield sign is there to let driver 1 know that he doesn't have to worry about a bullshit rolling stop ticket if there's no traffic on the through street. it's a great idea, but in practice, most drivers have their heads so far up their asses that they need the big red octagons or we'd all die (either in a crash or by starving because insurance premiums would be even more absurd)
>>699897718
what is the integral of sec^2(x)
>>699897718
It's only gay if I rub your balls on my balls.
>>699897905
Nah, that's as straight as a rainbow.
>>699892952
You are a fucking moron who should not drive...
2 has the right of way, and is not crossing a driving lane..3 has no yield, 1 has a yeild so must wait for other traffic. 1 with a yeild sign would never go first even in your state. Learn to fucking drive.
>>699892728
all at the same time
blame the jews
>>699897825
America, please stop with acronyms and teach your youth correctly.
t. The rest of the world
>>699897835
We just learn that every intersection without any signs is to be treated as a normal intersection and you generally have to slow down.
>>699897819
Robin. Quick, to the reduntmobile, watch the warning signs for me.
>>699897905
>>699897987
+ it is only gay if the dick heads touch.
>>699892728
2
3
1
Duh.
>>699898097
Copy that batcunt. Away!
>>699897873
>>699897905
>>699897987
Lets meet at an intersection and kiss each other's dicks, since we learned so much today
>>699892728
I live in fucking Houston. All three of these cars will go at the same time and then fuck about in the intersection
>>699892952
>This is how it is in my state
Would this be an independent state in southern asia?
Because that is not how traffic laws work in any US state.
>>699898194
Why not, I've earned a treat. Who goes first though?
>>699898194
Nothing gay about that. Just a couple of dudes being dudes, bonding a little, and having a good time.
>>699898037
>not investing in CERU
>not being involved in the last place to have true capitalism
go vote for bernie yurocuck
>>699892728
3 1 2. 3 no traffic controls. 1 and 2 have a yield so vehicle on right has right of way
>>699893272
You stay dumb even after people told you that you were dumb...you must be really dumb
>>699896993
This is a hidden roadway sign... since there is no thoroughfare, it is not relevant.
>>699898321
how to work as diriving instrucotr
>>699892728
You faggots obviously haven't driven in Manitoba.
We don't use yields, we'd probably not know what to do with them in the first place, so for the sake of conversation, assume it is a stop sign.
So car 1 will probably stop at the sign
>it's not a guarantee
Car 2 will probably treat the intersection as as if he has a stop sign and wait for car 1
Car 3 will take the corner at too high of a speed and clip car one when he cuts the corner trying to use too much of the road.
>>699892728
in Cali it is 2.3.1 always default to the "least resistance"
2 is headed straight no turns so he continues on, 3 has the right of way as he has no signs and simply waits on 2 who is speeding by - 1 proceeds when it is clear.
>>699897995
2 has a yield so the do not have the right of way
>>699898321
Maybe we should play some strip poker to figure it out.
First one naked gets to take it!!!!
>>699892827
easy peasy
231
>>699898413
OMG fuckin kek!
this was my entire experience of Winnipeg
>>699898364
Nigga do you not see that the sign near #2 is different than one next to #1? So its 2 first because its his road and he just driving straight, then 3 because he is turning but has no yield sign then 1.
>>699898433
also i should clarify for some illiterate faggots above, the sign that 2 is passing by is not a yield sign, perhaps a "T" intersection sign which in this context doesn't mean anything.
>>699894475
Except you said car 1 goes first, you fucking autist.
>>699898433
Wrong, yield signs Trump right of way
3 2 1
>>699893013
GTF out of here ya none american cunt
>>699894343
>invented driving
Thats a good one britfaggot
>>699898321
Longest dick I suppose, since he wont accept any rules pushed down by the supremacy of.. idk who. Reptilians.
After 15 Captcha with billboards I get 1 with cookies, how strange is that
>>699898616
This is the only correct answer.
>>699898609
so... you don't know what a yield sign looks like, huh?
In Canada it would be 3,1,2
3 would take the turn and cut off 2 causing them to come to a stop. 1 would take the turn right after 3, seeing the opening they made. 4 or 5 other cars would rush through right behind 1 and likely block the intersection for a few minutes. 2 can go when the traffic clears but the car in spot 1 that didn't get to pull into the intersection will likely honk.
>>699898609
exactly yield means in any context 1 will always be the last to go. Period. He has no more road left so he has to wait until it is clear no matter if there is a sign or not.
>>699898545
have you trie driving in alberta? i just arrived here from ontario to live here for a few years. the driving here is FUCKED
I don't know what that sign is next to 2, but it ain't a goddamn yield sign, or a stop sign for that matter. In fact, that's no sign I've ever seen. A yield sign points down, whatever that sign is it's not a yield. Looks like a caution sign, which does not denote right of way. So in lieu of that having no significance in my mind, 2 has the right of way and proceeds through the intersection, 3 is already in the roadway yielding the right of way to oncoming traffic, and is then granted the right of way, when 2 has passed, then turns left, 1 then turns left onto the roadway. Turning left onto a roadway from a side street yields to everyone on the roadway, just like u-turns do. Where the fuck did you plebians learn to drive?
>>699897585
Who ever crosses the least lines gets right of way. 2 crosses none and goes first. 3 crosses one and goes second. 1 crosses 2 and goes last. Basic fucking shit. How fucking hard is that to get? Every kid here learns this kind of shit before they're even allowed behind the wheel, and they don't need a god damn sign to tell them that. There is no deviation to this rule, this is the normal procedure, this is how it fucking works. I know you Eurofag and Americlaps can't operate independently of some dictating cunt micromanaging every little fucking tidbit of your lives but Christ all fucking mighty if you don't find new ways to surprise me every fucking day.
>>699898609
You are correct, yield signs would trump right of way. But there is only 1 yield sign in the picture.
ayy
>>699892728
1,2,3 simultaneously
>>699892728
i don´t like cars.
they´re dangerous, they make noise and smell bad.
>>699893031
fucking inbred
The car's are on the wrong side of the fucking road you wankers
>>699898813
nope, but honestly, everywhere i've driven in canada would have been stupid fucking hard even without traffic since nobody up there fixes roads. literally stopped my rental car in a pothole (like, all 4 wheels were in the same pothole).
>>699898652
Do we have to bring our own rulers? Cause we can't let the dick heads touch, that would be gay.
>>699898506
the sign on 2 is not a yield, it is a notice saying there is a hidden driveway on the right. (zoom in) There is almost never a circumstance where the right of way crosses two opposing driving lanes.
>>699898892
Phew, pull your dick back in, it's just a freaking sign you fag.
You'd be dead already if there wasn't any sign on bleach that you shouldnt drink it, so be grateful kiddo
>>699892728
2 then 3 because you give way to right england here
>>699892850
Correct.
>>699899090
Maybe they are gay. Like op.
>>699898892
This is flawed reasoning although your answer is right. I'm assuming by lines you mean lanes, but this would be expecting people to have situational awareness beyond looking at the signs that already clearly indicate the order of way.
>>699899090
Heads wont touch, since one is going to be so much bigger than the other's, at least 2 of 4 are going to touch someone's shaft. Is that still gay?
>>699899060
Are you autistic? Canada doesn't have any rules. It is total chaos up there. Why do you think america wants to build a wall?
You really need to get off the fucking road.
>>699899310
At that point, it's a judgement call depending on how much you enjoy it. Ah, who are we kidding, you're so gay.
>>699899353
Around Mexico stupid
How about if a car is moving and you're not and you want to get on the road, wait until the car passes you before going. Dumbasses.
>>699899508
No, wait, you're the gay one, remember?
Fucking billboards
>>699899310
Nah, it is only gay if the dick heads touch.
It is 2016, how do you not know this?
Seriously, get with the times man and fuck your male friends in the ass some time, they will appreciate it.
>>699899182
Funny how it seems to predominately be American teens that are drinking bleach to commit suicide, as a recreational drug, and to try and pass drug tests. Funny that even when there's a god damn sign on the bottle you cunts still do it, proving once again that even when something is absolutely idiot proof, America will always come along with a better idiot.
2 3 1
>>699899565
Um, have you been living under a rock? It is canada. Canada has a huge crime problem and it is making america ungreat again. Hillary 2069!!!
>>699900021
At least we agree that Americans are idiots, matey-o!
>>699898892
>has lines on their roads
>pussies
>>699892728
Maybe this is just a country thing but that warning sign in the car 2 lane should be yellow shouldn't it?
1 has a yield sign, so he goes last.
3 is cutting accross traffic, so he waits for that pane to clear.
2 proceeds with caution because apparently there's a bunch of dumbasses who think anyone but him has the right of way.
>>699900203
Everyone agrees with that. Except America, but nothing really surprising there.
>>699900309
>drives on roads
>pussies
ftfy
>>699900021
Who the fuck is drinking bleach you dozey twat? Citation fucking needed. And Americans have all those guns for suicide
>>699899258
Han, we aren't gay. OP is gay because he likes to drydock with his faggot ass friends. We just like it when there is a nice hard cock in our asses. Nothing gay about that.
>>699900563
You never try the bleach challenge?
It is making america great again...by cleaning up the gene pool.
2, 3, 1.
This thread is so fucking stupid. Literally everyone is fucing retarded. Its 2 3 1
2 has no yield sign and is going straight always has the right of way.
3 is on the same street but turning so it waits .
1 is not on the same street and is turning onto it. 1 is obviously last.
I'd be scared to be on the road with you fuck tards
>>699900146
youre just as bad as click bait.
>>699900842
>>699899265
>>699900309
Yes I did mean lanes, but lines works just a well I guess. But it's not really overly flawed. You can see the T-Intersection coming, as a driver, you should already know the basic set up and rules for using them. It's a universal rule for engaging T-Intersections, we don't differ between state, they don't change at all. There is only one exception and that is if 1 was coming from a 1 way/lane road and it would be marked with a sign for 2 and 3 to indicate as such, (in which case, 3 would not be able to turn and 1 will still give way to both). Unless it's marked with that sign, you know it's the basic version and don't require any additional information. It's all already there in your basic driver training.
>>699900309
Like I said, I meant lanes but it still works without lines, so if your out in some rural area, you know what to do.
>>699901345
>>699901332
kek, you know it.
>>699892728
who ever arrives first get to go first idots
2, 3, 1
mfw I failed the driving test 4 times already and still waiting for my 5th attempt, but there are niggas in there who got it wrong and are on the road
The correct answer is you should notify public saftey because of negros took the stops signs
you fucking morons, car 2 doesnt have a yield sign, open ur eyes. thats a point side up triangle. clearly not a yield sign. 2 would go first, even if they were turning, in the pic, first bc hes going straight. then car 3, bc again, no yield sign, and finally car 1, once safe to do so. anyone saying any different needs to go back to drivers ed
>>699892728
3,1,2
>>699898545
Funnily enough, Steinbach is about 3 times worse than Winnipeg.
I have almost been killed many times by people who clearly shouldn't be driving.
>>699902225
car 3 doesnt have the right away to turn across traffic when car 2 is going straight
>>699902225
wrong
2 3 1
But fwiw that yield sign does not belong there.
>>699902150
correct. That point side up triangle sign is in fact a sign indicating that the lane car 2 is in can go straight or turn. It is a dual arrow.
>>699900563
Citations fucking given. One for each individual use.
http://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/artie-lange-on-his-suicide-attempt-and-life-after-howard-stern-20131010
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1880/chloroformhabit.htm
http://www.odditycentral.com/news/crazy-drinking-habits-teens-drink-bleach-to-pass-drug-tests.html
>>699898813
Manitoba driver hater here, at least Alberta maintains their roads. I always risk totalling my car on any road.
>>699892728
2 goes first because he's turning right with no yield or stop sign, 3 goes second because he's on the opposite side of the road and is turning left, 1 goes last because of yield sign
>>699901332
Forgot to mention, I love click bait. It is so nice to start a video, mostly on youtube, expecting boobs or a set topic and not get it. It really turns me on, I guess you could call it my fetish.
>>699892728
2-3-1
I'm a Learner driver so idk for sure
2 because he's heading on the main lane, he has the right of way
3 because right hand rule for 1
1 has to wait for everyone because hes coming back from the side road, not the main one
Right?
>>699903151
Correct. See, even a learn can get it right.
>>699892952
2 doesn't have a yield sign, ding dong.
>>699902601
That is some weak proof, anon.
Try getting some creditable sources and come back then.
See picture for optimal efficiency
>>699892728
2-3-1
>>699894343
>invented driving
Never heard of Carl Benz and Gottfried Daimler?
>>699892728
#1 has to stops before engaging this new road or intersection, so he's last in terms of flow traffic priority over other vehicles already on that road
#3 is crossing #2 path so #2 has the priority whether he turn or continue ahead on that road
#2, #3, then #1
always safety 1st and courtesy 2nd
>>699903503
kek
>>699903503
kek
>>699903503
Traffic circles. We are using these all over the place now. They are much safer and faster for T-junctions and 4 ways that use signing. I wouldn't trust these to replace traffic light intersections though.
>>699903503
We call that a Round-About here, very handy things.
>>699892728
depends on country you live in .. in britain, all are wrong
if nigger- 132
if women- 213
if taxi driver- all except 231
if me- 231
None because they're on the wrong side of the side
>>699904286
roudabout kek
it's a carrefour giratoire
Check my dubs
>>699892728
I don't have a drivers license but by sheer logic it should be 2 3 1. Safety first niggers.
Anyone saying otherwise is a fucking asian female.
3, 2, 1 since 2 and 1 have yield signs and 2 and 3 are on the main road.
>>699905995
Gee, it's almost as if you idiots think every sign is a yield sign. Try again.
>>699905983
>doesn't have drivers license
>>699905687
That's a fucking mouth full, but then I guess you french cunts are used to having your mouths full so to speak.
>>699892728
2 - Traffic advisory, no yield, heading straight
3 - No yield, but must give right of way to 2
1 - Must grant right of way to 2, must yield for 3
>>699906788
He's right. The law in my state gives the right away to left turns over right turns. And turns from main streets over onto main streets.
The yield sign for driver 1 is more of a reminder not to be a dickhead
>>699907168
And yet he knows how it works. I don't have a degree in automotive engineering and yet I can give a decently detailed explanation the workings of a combustion engine. Road intersections aren't fucking rocket science.
>>699892827
this
>>699907581
Except he's not right you dunce. That's not a give way sign. This is why your country is fucking retarded, instead of one set of universal and logical road rule that make sense everywhere, you need a new handbook every time you cross a county/state line to detail the largely irrelevant nuances that really only exist for the sake of being different.
>>699894323
>only great britain drives on the left lane you uneducated non-europeans.
Sure. That’s why driving from Belfast to Dublin is SUCH a hassle: you have to move to other side of the road. RIGHT?
>>699902643
pahaha so i heard. glad i drove through the US to get here then
Gun it and Run it
fucking idiots, whoever got to the stop first, leaves first
>>699908960
Agreed, Murica can make some decent roads.
2-3-1
>>699910312
>implying its not possible to arrive same time.
>>699892728
3 1 2. Why is this hard exactly?
>>699910312
>Implying 2 and 3 have give way signs.
>>699911846
>Why is this hard exactly?
>Gets it wrong.
Kek.
