Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]
RandomArchive logo

Celebs whose nudes did not disappoint. Needs real, legit nudes

The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

Thread replies: 303
Thread images: 68
File: 1469328064303.jpg (429 KB, 1705x2040) Image search: [Google]
1469328064303.jpg
429 KB, 1705x2040
Celebs whose nudes did not disappoint.
Needs real, legit nudes to prove it
>>
>>699870740

Wow! holy shit!

Please more
>>
Moar
>>
>>699870740
actress name?
>>
File: Angie Varona 2014.png (503 KB, 480x640) Image search: [Google]
Angie Varona 2014.png
503 KB, 480x640
>>
>>699871349
Melissa Benoist
>>
File: audrey_tautou.webm (883 KB, 1280x544) Image search: [Google]
audrey_tautou.webm
883 KB, 1280x544
Both front and back
>>
File: 1470218702499.jpg (358 KB, 1792x1571) Image search: [Google]
1470218702499.jpg
358 KB, 1792x1571
>>
File: vanessa hudgens.jpg (348 KB, 960x1280) Image search: [Google]
vanessa hudgens.jpg
348 KB, 960x1280
>>
>>699872165
this kinda looks like some erotic art or something like that
>>
bump
>>
>>699873107
Girl Keemstar?
>>
File: ad.jpg (170 KB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
ad.jpg
170 KB, 1920x1080
>>699874547
>>
File: Tyene-GOT.webm (3 MB, 720x404) Image search: [Google]
Tyene-GOT.webm
3 MB, 720x404
>>
File: ganje.jpg (120 KB, 609x1150) Image search: [Google]
ganje.jpg
120 KB, 609x1150
>>
>>699871461
I-is that really her?
>>
>>699875618
it clearly is, you can see enough of her
>>
bump
>>
File: dunst.webm (3 MB, 1768x816) Image search: [Google]
dunst.webm
3 MB, 1768x816
>>
>>
File: 1456526633435.jpg (778 KB, 1960x2400) Image search: [Google]
1456526633435.jpg
778 KB, 1960x2400
>>699877441
>>
File: sWJtGDI.webm (2 MB, 1136x640) Image search: [Google]
sWJtGDI.webm
2 MB, 1136x640
>>699875191
>>
File: Christina-Hendricks-topless.jpg (307 KB, 1280x1024) Image search: [Google]
Christina-Hendricks-topless.jpg
307 KB, 1280x1024
Did they or didn't they?
>>
File: kek overload.jpg (4 KB, 99x125) Image search: [Google]
kek overload.jpg
4 KB, 99x125
>>699878117
>>
>>699875191
>>699878117
Her tits were so good it was hard to believe they exist
>>
>>699878771
flawless Italian tittties
>>
File: ellen page tits.webm (1 MB, 1920x1032) Image search: [Google]
ellen page tits.webm
1 MB, 1920x1032
>>
File: ellen page topless.webm (3 MB, 1920x1080) Image search: [Google]
ellen page topless.webm
3 MB, 1920x1080
>>699879382
>>
>>699879382
>>699879476
perfect
>>
>>
>>699875427
What the fuck
>>
Abigail spencers videos

http://newfappening.com/abigail-spencer-video-new-fappening/
>>
File: gillian-jacobs-13.jpg (64 KB, 884x1040) Image search: [Google]
gillian-jacobs-13.jpg
64 KB, 884x1040
>>
>>699874645

What the fuck is he doing with his mouth in this pic?

God damn what a cunt.
>>
File: 1452987606978.jpg (1 MB, 1936x2592) Image search: [Google]
1452987606978.jpg
1 MB, 1936x2592
>>699870740
Avril Lavigne. Waited a decade for them, they turned out great.
>>
>>699881240
Is there any proof that it's her though?
>>
>>699881240
Sure
>>
>>699881440
sure?
>>
>>699881467
sure!
>>
>>699881377
some folks found proof shortly after her pics leaked, matched clothes/jewellery/location to other pics of her and stuff
>>
>>699881467
Absolutely!
>>
>>699881240
You don't think those are meh?
>>
>>699870740
Is there more of this?
>>
>>699881377
from the icloud leak, right from her cellphone pics
>>
>>699875427
Betty White?
>>
>>699881637
how could they be meh?
>>
>>699881240
They were bigger than I thought they'd be. No complaints.
>>
>>699881090
Leafy fanboy
>>
>>699881377
did you miss the Fappening?
>>
>>699882107
No but I've seen a lot of doubt about the Avril Lavigne ones
>>
>>699882280
what doubt?
>>
>>699875427
Russian right?
>>
>>699875427
would bang
>>
>>699882280
From people who did miss the Fappening...
>>
File: 1457982359846.webm (2 MB, 534x892) Image search: [Google]
1457982359846.webm
2 MB, 534x892
>>
>>699870740
> Needs real, legit nudes to prove it
> Not the real girl

This picture you posted was in a looks a like thread. Faggot.
>>
>>699883016
what the hell are you talking about
>>
>>699883103
It's not Melissa Benoist. She looks like her, but it's not her.
>>
>>699883016
it's not a lookalike, they're leaked pics of the actress
>>
>>699881240
>>699880654
best fappening pics
>>
File: Melissa-Benoist-Naked-05.jpg (31 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
Melissa-Benoist-Naked-05.jpg
31 KB, 640x480
>>699883103
He's mistaken.
>>
>>699883346
Nope. You can see them on website making fake picture. It's not her. Like you, I wish it was true, but's it's not.
>>
File: Melissa-Benoist-Naked-041.jpg (35 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]
Melissa-Benoist-Naked-041.jpg
35 KB, 640x480
>>699883444
>>
>>699883457
>>699883457
>You can see them on website making fake picture
what
>>
>>699879382
>>699879476
>>699879968
Too bad she's a rug munching dyke SJW cunt.
>>
>>699883196
It looks like her because it is her. See >>699882107
>>
>>699882280
yeah these cant be confirmed, was hereon fappening
>>
>>699883512
oh fuck off
>>
>>699883533
how so?
>>
>>699883581
date on pic and chain around neck
>>
File: Melissa-Benoist-Naked-06.jpg (123 KB, 791x524) Image search: [Google]
Melissa-Benoist-Naked-06.jpg
123 KB, 791x524
>>699883196
It's clearly her. 100%.
>>
>>699883646
Explain?
>>
>>699883533
can*
>>
File: IMG_0564.jpg (2 MB, 2448x3264) Image search: [Google]
IMG_0564.jpg
2 MB, 2448x3264
Hope Solo
>>
>>699882280
There was a load of proof found around the leak time.
>>
>>699883492
>>699883459
>>699883457
>>699883444
>>699883375
>>699883346
>>699883196
>>699883103
>>699883016

Well, I got tricked by a thread proving it wasn't her. My bad Anon. I'm the faggot.
>>
>>699882906
wut?
>>
>>699883847
Well it's not her. It's some tumblr chick.
>>
>>699874645
>Hes
>>
>>699883196
The chin and mouth are a little different
>>
File: neckbears.gif (2 MB, 640x360) Image search: [Google]
neckbears.gif
2 MB, 640x360
>>699883512
>>
>>699883906
Ah ah ah. Fuck you :(
>>
>>699883646
didn't stuff like that verify it was authentic?
>>
>>699883847
Now i'm just confused. Is it Supergirl's actress in the porn pics or not?
>>
>>699884007
>>699883906
Well, same beauty spot on tits. You can see her naked on a movie
>>
>>699884097
Yes, I was wrong, I will show you why I was wrong
>>
File: 1321128994693.jpg (217 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
1321128994693.jpg
217 KB, 1024x768
>>699884113
uh huh
>>
>>699884097
It is not.
>>
>>699883817
>Hope

I call her Dread Solo after I saw genitalia.
>>
>>699884035
well the boob pic meta date was diffrent from the other leaks and theres a pic of avril with a chain but its a diffrent one
>>
File: victoria_justice10.jpg (89 KB, 703x528) Image search: [Google]
victoria_justice10.jpg
89 KB, 703x528
>>
>>699884255
different?
>>
>>699884325
thats right
>>
>>699883847
what did the thread say?
>>
File: shit.jpg (147 KB, 1128x594) Image search: [Google]
shit.jpg
147 KB, 1128x594
>>699884113
The right one is Low Quality, but if you find a good quality picture of her naked in a movie, you will see that's she is really her.

+ She is in the list of "victims" of fappening
>>
>>699884255
>was diffrent from the other leaks
How so?
>>
>>699884325
no, there was a pic of an identical one, right from the same day and all
>>
>>699884515
doesn't explain the facial differences
especially when moles are easily shooped
>>
>>699884203
> Implying Emma was on the fappening
> Implying Melissa wasn't on it
> Implying you can't cleary see it's photoshoped with the face
>>
>>699884618
the point is matching moles is pointless
>>
File: dfsdf.png (244 KB, 1207x1791) Image search: [Google]
dfsdf.png
244 KB, 1207x1791
>>699884609
>>
>>699883533
It was confirmed like right after the leak, I remember it.
>>
>>699884686
but a bunch of those had only fakes released
>>
File: 1407428980417.jpg (92 KB, 500x375) Image search: [Google]
1407428980417.jpg
92 KB, 500x375
>>699884609
Weird, sometimes people have different expressions then normal while having sex. Go outside some more faggot.
>>
>>699884203
Emma's tits aren't that big
>>
>>699884739
Newfag
>>
>>699884947
He's right. Alison Brie, Selena Gomez etc
>>
>>699881377
No, but they want to believe
>>
>>699885134
how new are you?
>>
How can you leak Farrah?
>>
File: image.jpg (144 KB, 408x408) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
144 KB, 408x408
>>
>>699881377
Someone did prove it.
>clothes and necklace match other pics of her
>moles match hers
>location matched to other pics
>EXIF showed same phone and date as her other leaks
>Nips and shape match some slips she had later
Also she did not deny they were hers, like other celebs did.
>>
>>699883646
Not the 2 completely different chain shit again.
You believers are retarded
>>
File: aubrey plaza fappening 01.jpg (99 KB, 950x960) Image search: [Google]
aubrey plaza fappening 01.jpg
99 KB, 950x960
>>
File: aubrey plaza fappening 02.jpg (108 KB, 897x960) Image search: [Google]
aubrey plaza fappening 02.jpg
108 KB, 897x960
>>
File: aubrey plaza fappening 03.jpg (259 KB, 1280x960) Image search: [Google]
aubrey plaza fappening 03.jpg
259 KB, 1280x960
>>
>>699873419
thought the same thing, pretty cool actually
>>
>>699875191
i'm pretty sure this was cgi, correct me if i'm wrong
>>
>>699884686
at least four or five of the celeb nudes turned out to be random tumblr nudes
>>
>>699885203
> believes faceless pic with no valid evidence
> calls others new
>>
>>699885456
kidding?
>>
>>699885508
there is though
>>
>>699885508
A lot of the icloud leaks had the celeb hiding their face, didn't mean they were all fake
>>
>>699885559
The exif that nobody can actually verify and is easily modified?
The fine ringlets chain compared to a broad flatlink chain?

There isn't anon.
>>
>>699885511
nope, they did the same thing with cersei from the show. There was an entire seen of her walking naked through the street and it was all cgi, but you really couldn't tell by watching it, it was that good.
>>
>>699885697
scene*
>>
>>699885456
you're thinking of the walk of shame I assume
>>
>>699885675
why would it be modified?
>>
File: chelsea.jpg (615 KB, 1250x938) Image search: [Google]
chelsea.jpg
615 KB, 1250x938
>>
>>699885763
yup
>>
>>699885829
that's a different scene/character
>>
>>699885675
post some evidence of that
>>
>>699885846
lol no shit it's a different character, that means nothing
>>
File: 1309140_original.jpg (409 KB, 1910x1070) Image search: [Google]
1309140_original.jpg
409 KB, 1910x1070
>>699877441
>>699877804
>>
>>699885295
and done
>>
File: 1460264048280.gif (2 MB, 310x290) Image search: [Google]
1460264048280.gif
2 MB, 310x290
>>699870740
>>
>>699885915
Well that's the scene with CG
>>
>>699885697
I hope this is a joke. The Cersei scene had some of the most blatant shitty cgi of all time. It would've looked more realistic if she was walking while holding a cardboard cutout of a naked woman's body in front of her.
>>
>>699885456
pls be joking/trolling
>>
>>699885301
The pic is likely real. If you don't want it posted, find some evidence it's fake.

Not just poking holes in the evidence it's real. Find something to debunk it.
If you can.
>>
>>699884255
elaborate
>>
>>699885912
This is the "matching" chain.
The chain in the tit pic could not reflect like that, only a flat link chain can
>>
File: 1441642236565.webm (1 MB, 1280x720) Image search: [Google]
1441642236565.webm
1 MB, 1280x720
>>
>>699885456
CGI in what way?
>>
>>699874547
> news
>>
>>699886333
>that quality
>>
>>699878603
real?
>>
File: 7chv4ge0n5jl4lh7.jpg (216 KB, 1071x1500) Image search: [Google]
7chv4ge0n5jl4lh7.jpg
216 KB, 1071x1500
>>699886333
>>
>>699886432
That's the proof pic, I didn't take it
>>
>>699874645
What a fucking cuck. I'm sure it cum from some bull
>>
File: 1469633558315.jpg (270 KB, 1536x1960) Image search: [Google]
1469633558315.jpg
270 KB, 1536x1960
>>
>>699886333
told you fags, its not avrils boobs
>>
File: elizabeth olsen.webm (2 MB, 818x720) Image search: [Google]
elizabeth olsen.webm
2 MB, 818x720
>>699886708
>>
>>699886573
even rests between her tits in the same place as >>699881240
>>
>>699886801
when did you tell us?
>>
>>699886180
That's not how it works anon.

That's like saying you have to actually.prove that Bigfoot doesn't exist, don't just point out why the evidence doesn't really make sesne
>>
>>699886821
Glorious
>>
>>699886882
earlier fool
>>
>>699887028
No one said they weren't hers earlier
>>
>>699886960
That they leaked from her icloud along with a dozen other pics from the same day indicates it's at least likely to be real.

So like I said, find something to actually debunk it, if you can. The Selena Gomez fake leak was debunked easily, if this is fake it should be easy too.
>>
>>699885456
Where did you get this info from?
>>
>>699884254
fucking kek
>>
>>699887028
>>699887080
No one fucking cares anymore
>>
File: Avril_Lavigne16.jpg (144 KB, 1200x1628) Image search: [Google]
Avril_Lavigne16.jpg
144 KB, 1200x1628
>>699886801
So why do they look 100% like her tits? You seem weirdly sure they're not hers.
>>
File: Avril-proof.jpg (751 KB, 4583x2834) Image search: [Google]
Avril-proof.jpg
751 KB, 4583x2834
>>
>>699887379
I do.
>>
File: 1470515408316.jpg (2 MB, 2521x1401) Image search: [Google]
1470515408316.jpg
2 MB, 2521x1401
>>
>>699887406
rekt
>>
>>699885478
>>699884739
>>699884686
which celebs are you talking about?
>>
>>699885295
All of this
>>
>>699881637
>>699881788
I think they're pretty great.
>>
File: Winona-Ryder-Naked-02.jpg (139 KB, 480x640) Image search: [Google]
Winona-Ryder-Naked-02.jpg
139 KB, 480x640
better late than never
>>
>>699887229
You have no idea how many times the fappening was removed and re-upload ed with additions that day.
It wasn't even all released in one go.
It also didn't start here, it was at anonib

So many fakes were added, you can't say it came from her I cloud just because you downloaded them in the same folder.

Here's a more recent Avril leak.
Same evidence to support both being real
>>
>>699887428
We'll no one likes you. You fucking shit cuck. So go cry into your mom's pussy and fuck off.
>>
>>699886573
btfo
>>
>>699887636
>this butthurt
>>
>>699887636
Hers all dropped in two imgur albums, in two halves

About 16 pics.
>>
>>699883196
Found Melissa's PR agent, everybody!
>>
File: 1466186677993.jpg (84 KB, 924x1359) Image search: [Google]
1466186677993.jpg
84 KB, 924x1359
>>699887599
They're perfect. She's perfect.
>>
>>699887452
>Unverifiable exif
>Completely different chains
>A mole

That's far from rekt anon
>>
>>699887785
It is easily verifiable though.
>>
File: kfc porn.png (596 KB, 1153x537) Image search: [Google]
kfc porn.png
596 KB, 1153x537
>>699882906
love this movie love this girl
>>
>>699871461
Was that sextape someone had up real or a fake it was taken down so..
>>
>>699870740
any info on the leaker or the guy who took the photo ?
>>
>>699887785
The chains aren't different.
>>
>>699887945
their porn photographer
>>
>>699887829
Do it then
>>
>>699883512
Unlike most SJWs, she seems to actually do it for non-self-absorbed reasons. Or maybe she gets a self esteem boost from coming across as a non-self-absorbed SJW, in which case she really is a cunt. But I don't think so.
>>
>>699887952
See this you idiot
>>699886333
They are completely different
>>
>>699870740
y did the fuckin superwoman have to do porn pics, how disappointing and how fucking accurately this fact describes the female species. even fucking super woman has n00ds all over the internet.
>>
File: exif.png (171 KB, 1140x394) Image search: [Google]
exif.png
171 KB, 1140x394
>>699888007
Ok.
>>
>>699888078
See this >>699886573
>>
>>699883847
Oh shit. Did her PR people get to you? If her PR agent is not threatening you for these posts, please reply saying you are not under threat.
>>
>>699887406
How is 2 completely different necklaces proof? Is it because they are both gold and she likes gold or something?
>>
>>699887636
give ya 20$ for new leaks bre
>>
>>699888354
see >>699886573
>>
>>699884901
why dont these bitches give away there nude and sex tapes...that will only increase there fan base.. remember peris hilton .. how she got popular so mucch
>>
>>699887229
He can't debunk it. That's why all he does is feebly poke holes in the evidence for it.
>>
>>699887406
I think ya'll need to realise a lot of people have freckle/moles. it's not madness to suggest a lot of women have one in a very similar area and wear a gold necklace.

It's not proof or disproof
>>
>>699888312
I'm going to conveniently ignore that.
>>
>>699888290
Wow, you extracted exif from an image saved from 4chan?
Even though 4chan removes exif.
Now that's talent
>>
>>699888523
While also having tits that 100% match the celeb's, and also having the pic taken at the same time the celeb has the same chain on, and also matching the same time all the other leaked pics of her were taken?
>>
>>699888312
But I'd you go with that picture, you can't use the date as evidence.
That's not the picture that allegedly matches the time and location, so it's irrelevant
>>
>>699888551
No, I extracted EXIF from the original photo from the leak, still widely available.
>>
>>699888726
It's from the same day as >>699886333
The shitty quality of that pic is what's making the chain look different. On the higher quality pic I posted you can clearly see it's a fine linked chain, not flat link.
>>
>>699888551
you're failing, anon
>>
>>699888496
The evidence is bullshit, that's the point.

You want it to be real, so you refuse to accept it can't be
>>
>>699873107
Fake
Oddly she has a very good real set
>>
>>699889089
that's real dumbass
>>
>>699889075
I don't know what it is you're hoping I'll say to this
>>
>>699888726
That pic is from November 24th 2012
>>
File: image.gif (3 MB, 300x252) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
3 MB, 300x252
>>699883906
Fuck off summer fag
Try harder
>>
>>699889075
it's pretty strong really >>699885295
>>
>>699886801
how do you know
>>
>>699875427
Is that really Lindsay Lohan or just shopped?
>>
>>699889564
So now it's not from the same day as the other pic?
>>
>>699889867
You're right, it's now even closer to the nude pic's date.
>>
File: 1468274762021.jpg (29 KB, 600x427) Image search: [Google]
1468274762021.jpg
29 KB, 600x427
I choose to believe
>>
>>699889605
If the same evidence was used as proof for some random girl, everyone would laugh at it.

It's flimsy as fuck
>>
>>699886359
>trap thread
>>
>>699890117
>has no actual debunking of it
unsurprising
>>
>>699890112
Facial girl is some /soc/ girl, pic predates the fappening.
>>
>>699887636
"So many fakes were added"

Wrong, a few were but they were in existing sets that were being sold. The source of the photos are known. The burden is to disprove not prove ya fucking morons
>>
>>699889867
So one day closer to 26th and also showing she was wearing the chain multiple days in a row on holiday. I don't think this helps your case.
>>
File: 1471361254001.jpg (44 KB, 548x442) Image search: [Google]
1471361254001.jpg
44 KB, 548x442
>>699883512
Yeah, it is... on the day of the rope we'll have to either put her up against the wall, or force her into an ISIS style camp.

oh well.
>>
>>699885203
how funny would that question be irl
>>
>>699885954
wat did she throw?
>>
>>699890347
This. All the "added fakes" were old fakes or lookalikes that were on the web well before the fappening. If the pic didn't exist on the web before the icloud leak, you can assume it's legitimately from the celeb's icloud.

There's some that aren't, like Kate Upton's, because it wasn't her icloud that got hacked, it was her boyfriend's, and he had some other women nude on it too in addition to her. But Avril's, JLaw's, etc, were all theirs.
>>
>>699890209
I’ve heard that but never seen any evidence
>>
>>699890347
No, the burden is to prove.
You can't say Santa is real unless someone can prove he isnt

Maybe courts should adopt that logic too?
Accused of a crime, guilty unless.you can prove you didnt do it

The fact that you have to take that stand just shows how poor the evidence is
>>
>>699890737
More like accused of a crime after being found standing over the body holding the murder weapon and announcing "I'm glad I killed the bastard".
>>
>>699887883
That was one of the best scenes in any movie ever.
>>
>>699890465
Except it's not the same chain multiple days in a row.
>>
>>699890719
It was some guy posting pics of his gf on /soc/, well before the fappening. You can look it up easily.
>>
>>699886359
source???
>>
>>699890943
Yes it is you fucking idiot. You've already had it explained to you.
>>
>>699887617
Her face looks spooky
>>
>>699890943
see >>699888891


You are mistaking bad quality causing artificing for "differences".
>>
>>699890827
Really?
If the tit pic was of a murder, courts wouldn't convict based on the evidence.
They would call it circumstantial at best
>>
>>699881069
She looks like that dumb bitch from rooster teeth
>>
>>699887785
sauce for the pic was found ages ago, was some random college girl's nudes, named Roxy or Rochelle or Rachael or something along those lines. There were some other angles of the tits including showing some of the face.
>>
>>699891156
I think you're taking this a little literally
>>
>>699891026
>>699891136
Triggered much?
This chain >>699889867
Is not the same as that fine chain.
Just the thickness of it should.should . make that obvious.

The thinner the straw, the tighter you grasp it I guess
>>
>>699891396
>has it explained to him several times
>still can't grasp it and clings to the same shoddy point.
>>
>>699891396
How does that explain >>699886573
>>
File: 1466101568844.jpg (438 KB, 1500x2000) Image search: [Google]
1466101568844.jpg
438 KB, 1500x2000
>>699891303
BS
>>
>>699890973
If true, the girl is a good lookalike of JL and the rooms in the pictures look pretty similar to. As I recall the “fake” pictures were posted a week before the fappening. Isn’t it possible that they were just released before it all started?
>>
>>699875427
I'm angry now, but i don't exactly know what made me angry about this
>>
>>699891618
I know a girl in Sydney that's has a chain like that.
It must be a photo of her tits then.

A chain that almost every girl on earth has was never worth anything as far as proving shit, whether you believe the pics real or not
>>
>>699892208
Ok you're retarded.
>>
>>699890737
in america you ARE guilty until proven "innocent"
>>
>>699892208
First it's "the chains aren't the same!", then it was "the dates are faked!", now its "it doesn't matter if they're the same and the dates match!".
>>
>>699892340
>>699892249
it's a troll

ignore
>>
>>699892340
It's ok anon.
You can believe it if you want to.
As long as you have faith, that's all that matters
>>
>>699871491
is she the one playing that spiderman thingy?
>>
>>699892208
Ok, I got nothing.
>>
>>699891303
if this is true then lol at the belivers
>>
File: image.jpg (1 MB, 2335x3456) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
1 MB, 2335x3456
>>
I'm glad I spend most of my time on celeb threads overnight. Never seen so much bs arguing in a thread before.
>>
File: iknowright.gif (227 KB, 500x281) Image search: [Google]
iknowright.gif
227 KB, 500x281
>>699888551
>mfw these wannabe skids dont have a clue about obfuscation
>>
>>699892967
>>699891303
I just looked it up assuming it was BS but....damn. It's not.

>>699892695
You were right, they're not her tits. I was jerking to fakes this whole time.
>>
File: image.jpg (145 KB, 680x1024) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
145 KB, 680x1024
>>
>>699893299
>Suck on this Bieber!
>>
File: drew.jpg (81 KB, 557x950) Image search: [Google]
drew.jpg
81 KB, 557x950
>>
>>699893730
that's a fake penis
>>
File: 1468519165089.jpg (95 KB, 655x579) Image search: [Google]
1468519165089.jpg
95 KB, 655x579
>>699893907
You're a fake penis
>>
>>699870740
I was pretty stoked that I got to cross Ellen Page off the list the other night with Netflix's new original, Tellula. Within the first five minues of the beginning of the movie, too.

I didn't know I was going to be gifted such beautiful rewards; I was very pleasantly surprised. Another box on the list ticked off.
>>
>>699894349
didn't see her in Into The Forest last month?
>>
>>699892208

like you know a girl! haha, shiieet
>>
>>699894334
Not true. My penis is a legit and confirmed cunt
>>
>>699887883
What movie is this
>>
>>699870740

too old, too hairy
>>
>>699894971
I second, though. You're a fake penis
>>
roll
>>
>>699895637
fag
>>
>>699886821
So... Does that count as having seen both?
>>
>>699896632
both what?
>>
>>699896926
They're twins. You do the math.
>>
File: EKJfZNd.jpg (747 KB, 2400x3600) Image search: [Google]
EKJfZNd.jpg
747 KB, 2400x3600
>>699897042
That is neither Olsen twin, it's their younger sister Elizabeth, in the middle here
>>
File: Charisma Carpente.jpg (97 KB, 1000x754) Image search: [Google]
Charisma Carpente.jpg
97 KB, 1000x754
>>
>>699897138
>younger sister
>that much taller
I'm so sorry.
>>
>>699897275
and much better looking, with bigger tits and more talent
>>
>>699897328
the older girls created a fashion empire
and are now billionaires.
you picked the wrong one.
>>
File: Dunst.webm (3 MB, 1392x800) Image search: [Google]
Dunst.webm
3 MB, 1392x800
>>699877006
>>
>>699897328
they're all sexy as fuck. i'd love to see a three way with them all high out of their mind on crack
>>
>>699872165
Selective coloring is stupid and looks bad nearly 100% of the time
>>
File: side.webm (2 MB, 1174x720) Image search: [Google]
side.webm
2 MB, 1174x720
>>699897537
To gawk at nude pictures on the internet?
No I think I picked the right one.
>>
>>699897537
You seem to be implying triple BJ isn't the best possible outcome.
>>
>>699884283
Her nipples are brown. Even Selena Gomez has pink nips.
>>
>>699897998
so?
>>
>>699877441
I dont like sand though
>>
File: image.gif (314 KB, 248x200) Image search: [Google]
image.gif
314 KB, 248x200
>>699883817
>>
>>699890112
dubs say its real
>>
>>699885134
only smart person here
>>
File: 1471315157960.jpg (23 KB, 358x238) Image search: [Google]
1471315157960.jpg
23 KB, 358x238
>>699875427
Why
>>
>>699893874
I like drew but don't think that's a good pic of her.
>>
>>699898052
I'm just saying is all. In case anyone thought they were perfect.
>>
>>699897722
god damn what perfect tits
>>
>>699898161
comfirmed fake
>>
>>699898429
They are
>>
>>699897042
Retard
>>
>>699897722
What is the scarlet witch doing with thanos?
>>
File: 1470906922643.jpg (266 KB, 1468x858) Image search: [Google]
1470906922643.jpg
266 KB, 1468x858
Thread replies: 303
Thread images: 68


Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]
Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [Home]


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site. This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived. If you need information for a Poster - contact them.