Could time travel be possible? If so, how?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Could time travel be possible? If so, how?
>>696773670
The question is, how isn't it possible?
Gravitational forces from black holes have already been found to bend time-space, there's no telling what we can use that for in the future.
>>696773670
traveling to the future is possible but idk about the past
>>696773911
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation
We can probably go forward in time, but being next to a black hole wouldn't be the most comfortable thing.
And we can't really go back in time unless we manage to reverse gravity.
Sorry, no. I don't remember who said it but you can't put your foot in the same stream twice. The stream may be the same but the original water has moved away.
>>696773670
well there is theory's suggesting travelling to the future is possible,but not the past.
>>696774458
What?
>>696773670
perhaps.
But I'm only allowed to tell after the year 2487
>>696774999
TRIPS OF TRUTH
>>696773670
If time travel was real, shouldn't there have someone from the future travel to the present already?
>>696773670
The entropy in the sim is bidirectional. Even if you could reverse the direction of all of the matter in the universe, the entropy would still behave in the same way. You'd really just spin off a new future.
>>696775329
Why would anybody from the future come here? They're probably all in Rome for the orgies and gladiator games.
>>696775722
Or maybe there were no orgies or gladiators until some folks from the future went back and made Rome their playground.
>>696773670
time travel is impossible. there is no past or future, only the present. in order for time to go forward or backwards you'd need 1 a parallel universe or 2 all current matter in the universe to revert back to a previous state.
>>696775329
maybe they can't go back to an era where the time machine hasn't been invented yet
Primer was a pretty interesting movie, first time I'd seen a time travel story that seemed like it could really be posible.
>>696773670
fart power
>>696775930
and in order to travel to the future, you'd have to create an invention that can predict and create what matter would exist in said created state. it's just not possible.
>>696773670
Of course not, anyone who says otherwise is a delusional fool living in their own fantasy world.
>>696776502
quiet, shill
>>696773911
this is a stupid theory. bending time space is essentially altering its present form. you'd have to completely change the matter existing in that bend to a previous state. it would have to take an entirely different parallel universe, as i said before, with all current matter existing in that universe and that universe would have to create and sustain life in a past form and recreate the events that happened in said past form. it's just not possible.
We can't, cause we haven't went into a back hole and back.
Btw, every time think beforehand that, if, we could, the future would had said so by coming here. We would know, right?
i am a time travel
>>696775930 <me
>>696776458 <me
>>696776917 <me
prove me wrong faggots. protip: you can't.
>>696773670
Some of you faggots actually believe technology will keep advancing at the same rate we've seen over the past century until we reach the type of tech you see in scifi movies.
Technological advancement is gonna plateau real soon, and we'll never get anywhere near interstellar travel, let alone time travel.
>mfw
Am I time travel?
>>696777493
>Theory
>>696773670
It's probably not your business
>>696775930
>>696776458
>>696776917
1) How do we know there isn't one or more parrallel universes that we can travel to?
2) Would speeding up time for you but not for others count as time traveling? We can already do that.
If sexts, time travel is confirmed possible
Why does time only have to go 1 direction? What if in another universe, time goes the other way. I think I've said too much.
777
>>696777468
And what do you base that on, besides something you pulled out of your ass?
>>696777677
shit
>>696777777
>7s
>>696777777
Kek
>>696777493
What does time dilation have to do with his rambling mess of a statement. Fuck did sara palin make that post?
>>696777777
nigger what
>>696777777
sexts dont lie
>>696777777
fuck you got it
>>696777777
Holy Jesus, that was me!
Who do you think wins the power balls...?
>>696777777
waste of six, asshole
>>696777777
WITNESSED!!!
>>696774458
The pre-socratic Greek philosopher Anaximander
>>696775930
Time dilation is proven fact you idiot.
Moving forward in time at a different rate than everything is can and does happen.
>>696777777
my name a cunt
>>696777777
all hail
>>696777621
>Mfw time dilation has been proven using synchronized atomic clocks, one stationary on Earth and one accelerated on the ISS
>Mfw no longer just theory
>>696777777
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>>696777777
( Í Â° ÍŸÊ– ͡°)
>>696777777
It has to be true
SEXTS DO NOT LIE!!
>>696778007
James Cunt
>>696777777
WITNESSED
>>696777493
>General Theory of Relativity
>Theory
Key word: theory.
Time represents a change in matter and existence. Time is a theory and your "general theory of relativity" is a theory based on a theory. Kill yourself, you worthless piece of waste.
>>696777777
>>696777493
>>696778022
For reference:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation
>>696777777
goddamn, this is the greatest day of my life.
>>696777777
I'm soooo hiiigh
>>696777907
He said that time travel was impossible, but we've already discovered time travel into the future is plausible.
Going back in time however, we still have no clue on.
>>696777416
These make sense, I like this guy
>>696777621
> fact
That's why GPS satellites need their clocks updated regularly
>>696777478
SKELLENTON
>>696777975
You wrote theory though, how should I know more, chill newfag
>>696777642
1: So we're going to base a theory on an assumption? Sorry, logically that is a stupid decision and a waste of time.
2: explain further by speeding up time for me but not others.
ye
>>696777642
Pretty sure just riding along on the prevailing wave of time without altering its speed counts as time travel. Welcome to the future, faggot! Unfortunately we still have a lot of faggots!
>>696777777
respect
>>696777777
Posting
All your time are belong to me
>>696775930
>>696776917
But there is infinite universes
Is there not?
Yes time travel is possible . already been proven.. With the use of the flux capasitor.
>>696777986
alright you're making the claim. prove it's a fact. show me proof.
>>696773670
The Earth moves at a massive speed, around a Sun that moves at a greater speed, as part of a galaxy moving at incredible speeds.
If you could step out of the constraints of space time to re-enter it even a second later, you'd likely be in the vacuum of space. It'd be a rough ride.
>>696778237
What the fuck are you talking about. Time dialation does not let you go into the future, it just effects how time passes to the traveler.
>>696778187
Thatsa shame
>>696778355
Wrong greentext, aww
Why do I use my phone to join b(?)
>>696777621
a theory is a series of well tested hypothesis, not some day dream you had
>>696777468
It will speed up, if anything.
Philadelphia experiment?
>>696778202
wut second poster is a second behind
>>696774196
>This
If you managed to come relatively close to travelling near the speed of light you could effectively return to earth after your journey having aged very little compared to those that remained on the planet... You'd still need to remain on your spacecraft for a number of years though yourself, so it's not exactly a practical time machine
>>696778597
this is something i figured out when i was about 10 years old , it ruined a few time travel movies for me
>>696778502
show me an infinite universe.
>>696777777
I saw that shit . Time travel is possible. Check em
>>696777777
I was here when it happened, dick in hand.
>>696778267
That is not right. But the clocks do run faster and don't keep correct time when on earth. They are designed to pass time right, according to us, once in orbit.
>>696778660
My country made that word.
I do know what it means, and, you are sadly wrong
>>696778562
Atomic clocks on earth, and atomic clocks on satellites which are moving extremely fast don't stay synchronized even though they measure the same way.
I'm not going to post 1000 links when you could google time dilation
Science nerds are nerds.
When it comes to time travel, there's no way of knowing, until we actually achieve it.
There's also the paradox of if time travel is possible at some point in the future, why haven't we travelled back to our present?
>>696773670
Due to Einstein's law of relativity, moving forward in time is possible. As you travel at speeds near the speed of light, time for you is experienced slower than others. It can be seen when to put two clocks at the same time, send one around the world on a plane, and they would be different times. Moving fast enough, you will travel in time faster then time on Earth. Travelling into the past is impossible. It would require infinite energy to travel faster than light. Law of conservation of mass and energy applies so that traveling back in time, there would be two of each particle in your body, and thus increasing the mass in the universe, and removing mass in present day.
tl;dr
Travel forward in time? YES
Travel backward in time? NO
Dude, we're all time travelling right now.
It's forward, of course, but still- TIME TRAVEL!
>>696778620
Yes it does, Einstein.
If you were to travel at the speed of light, what feels like a minute for you would be much longer for the people back on Earth, so if you returned after traveling at that speed time would have passed, and you would have traveled into the future.
Relativity 101 lad.
>>696776502
Ofc it **IS** possible, just not in the way shown by all the movies etc. And possibly only in the future, but not into the past, as this would create a paradoxon.
>>696779050
Who says I didn't?
>>696773670
It is possible by means of traveling through wormholes which are bridges between space-time but the energy required to make a wormhole stable to pass through are beyond what we can currently manage
>>696773670
drugs and meditation
>>696777677
fuck FUCK
>>696777777
O.C. for you anon
>>696778806
>show me an infinite universe
No u twat, I'm trying to say there is more than one universe. Billions and trillions which are all contained in the multiverse
>>696777468
"everything that can be invented has been invented." - Charles H. Duell, circa 1899
>>696778899
just cause your country made that word does'nt mean you know it.
>>696779084
>>696778980
doesn't want to post a link. just spews a bunch of bullshit.
We're talking about time travel not two clocks moving at different speeds. again, you are stupid.
time travel is not possible.
>>696779249
Well, prove it.
>>696778770
What about the negative speed of light?like you go so slow, that everything is moving at what seems the speed of light around you so everyone goes like 25 years into the future while it's only been like 3 years for you
>>696779084
No you need to stop saying this and learn something. That is not what it means you dumb fuck. First when you go fast ti.e slowest down. That is a proven fact!
>>696779422
Ok, Google it
>>696777416
You are just thinking on a pararell universe where all the matter is just in the same place as it was in our unevers or it will be.
Think about you going slower than all the matter in the universe, this will be a "travelin to the future" but in the same univers as you are.
Sorry is my english is bad
There are places in space where you can kick yourself in the back of the head.
>>696779496
>Atomic clocks
>Synchronized
>Physically incapable of operating at different rates unless time dilation is occurring
You sir, are the idiot here.
Oh, here's your link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation
>>696779496
It demonstrates that time isn't a constant.
>>696775722
>shit like this
What if Hitler did what he did because one of us went back and told him what he would inevitably do? I mean yeah everybody would have starved if he didn't but what If the cold hard atrocity side was us indirectly expediting the outcome?
>>696777777
All you sumerfags don't appriciate this at all. Get the fuck out niggers.
>>696779185
That is more of a stretch then spegitification. That is akin to taking a nap and waking up at a late date. It is not time travel you dumb fuck stop saying that!
>>696776162
i also enjoyed that movie faggot
>>696779595
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hypothesis
>>696779838
No, you're just an autistic fuckwit.
>>696778980
Let's get one thing clear. Time travel means to go into the future say the year 3000. Not your fucking clock or calendar changing to the year 3000. But everything in the known universe moving 1000 years into the future. Meaning all events happening between now and the year 3000 come to pass. Which also means ALL matter has currently accelerated ~1000 years into the future. NOT your fucking anime calendar with a mans lipstick stain. And not your fucking clock.
>>696778672
It's definitely gonna slow down in the near future.
With Moore's law more or else dying off,computing power is gonna plateau until alternatives are found or quantum computers actually starts to become viable. Whenever that happen's thing should skyrocket again.
Since you cannot prove your own existence, time travel is equal to or less than possible than the chance of you and or even more abstractly- I being real. Before you can even discuss time travel go ahead and define time that is satisfactory to everyone - good luck! Regards, Adam 2143
>>696779571
>negative speed of light
>literally 0 miles per hour
>>696779838
sexts really havent been anything to get excited about for nearly a decade now. happen far too often
Jesus .....all u need is 80mph and a fucking flux capacitor. Science faggot
>>696779975
Go back to your cage nigger.
>>696779378
If you want to make that claim but can't show me another universe different from ours, then you are just spewing bullshit theories. I'm taking facts. Fuck scientific theories. They are just that, theories.
>>696779571
Negative speed of light? You mean stopping? Time would pass very very fast and you would die.
>>696779571
That's called equilibrium or max entropy, physfag that has been lurking, just watching you autists be autists.
>>696779855
You're not understanding, and I'm trying to put this as simply as I can.
Here's how you explain it to kids.
>If you go really really fast, what feels like a moment to you may be a full hour for others
>If you continue to do this, then stop, and go back to the others, more time will have progressed for those going at the slower speed relative to you
Relativity 101.
>>696779719
Agree time dilation is a proven fact.
>>696779665
Just because i go slower doesn't mean i've time traveled. That means i'm still currently existing in the present state just not CHANGING at the same rate as everything around me.
>>696780100
This
Oh oh, I meant "theory", still this "argument" was lost on your part
>>696780152
Not if you slowed your heart rate and all metabolic processes
ITT: Retards arguing with other retards about a topic they know shit all about
>>696777777
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDDDDDDSSSSSSSSS
>>696777777
>>696779995
>Not understanding relativity
>Not understanding time is relative and that not all matter has to progress in time for time to shift
TIME is a representation of matter going through CHANGE. In order for TIME to CHANGE all MATTER would have to CHANGE.
>>696778155
Why does everyone here have a hard time understanding the word "theory?"
Were you home schooled with books from the Flat Earth Society?
"Theory" in a scientific context means working model. It doesn't mean "guess." A lot of theories have been disproven, but that doesn't mean they can't still be used - you can still predict the positions of the planets (sans Mercury) using Copernicus' methods. People still build bridges and structures using classical mechanics.
There's no point in saying that something is "just a theory." What else would it be? And before you say "law," laws aren't "proven theories," they're just specific statements from a theory.
tl;dr learn 2 science, bitch
>>696780303
Then you should stop explaining it to them. It is not time travel. Time is moving slower for the fast moving body. Saying it is time travel is fucking stupid.
>>696780355
Yeah i was grong on that, i was thinking in going faster that the universe
>>696780497
Well since time is passing very fast you would have to stop it.
>>696780036
Just walk bakcwards
science teacher told me this once:
if we could travel at light speed, and orbit the earth for 10 years, when you come back down 100 years will have passed on earth.
>>696780586
That's why it's time travel.
It's allowing someone to shift time far into the future for what is only a moment for them.
Thus time travel into the future.
Did you complete grade school? You seem to lack basic reasoning and understanding.
>>696780014
A quantum computer already exists. Think it's called D-Wave or something. The plateau/slowdown just isn't going to happen.
As soon as we have decent AI (which will happen pretty soon) there'll be no stopping advancements.
>>696780497
ahh, someone slightly enlightened, exactly, lack of movement or action would mean it would be an "instance" in time, thus there would be nothing happening.
>>696779574
Time doesn't "slow down." Time feels normal for you, and everyone else. But, you observing someone observing time passing is completely different for them. Ex. You are on a spacecraft orbiting LEO (Low Earth Orbit), traveling very quickly compared to the ground of Earth. You travel for one year. On the ground, it has been longer on Earth for the people there than a year.
What I am describing in time dilation. Before telling me stop teaching things, make sure what I teach is false before calling me out.
>>696780563
You don't know what you're talking about. Explain without google how "time is relative". You are a couch potato using scientific studies to sound smart when in all reality you're a moron.
>>696780121
Nice comeback, faggot.
>>696780093
What is this, fucking /r/science or /b/?
>>696777777
checked, time travel is possible
>>696778620
If you could drive at 100mph, but cover 200 miles in that hour, wouldn't you call that a form of travelling?
>>696781109
>/b/ - random
>>696780586
Well one of us understand reletivity and time dilation and thet person is not you. I do agree that it is symantics, but why the fuck would you ever put it that way? It is just fucking stupid. It paints an unclear picture.
>>696780844
Kek
The only reason TIME exists is because we can see a CHANGE in the things around us. A passing in current events. Time was CREATED. It never existed.
>>696780874
I know quantum computing "exists", but it's far from being practical and insanely unreliable in it's current state.
I'm sure AI isn't far off, but artificial consciousness is the shit we gotta watch out for.
Yes time travel is possible . already been proven.. With the use of the flux capasitor. And the scientific theory that your all faggots
>>696778875
No they don't, they get updated to correct the difference you idiot.
Look it up, it's common knowledge for fucks sake
>>696781344
Causality
>>696781000
AGH the fucking summer
The definition of time travel:
the action of traveling through time into the past or the future.
You can't go to the past. Those events have already come to pass and for you to relive them you'd have to CHANGE all matter around you as i said before. Which isn't possible. Or you'd have to enter a parallel universe which doesn't exist.
>>696780855
If you could travel at light speed, time for you would stop. Eternity would pass you by while you experienced no time at all.
Of course, you'd also have infinite mass, which is why matter can't move at the speed of light.
>>696773670
If its possible, id bet the research would start with this. If its true.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/physicists-prove-time-travel-possible-by-sending-particles-light-into-past-1453839
>>696781000
Are you Reddits' offical mascot?
>>696780918
Time is relative to the observer and factors such as acceleration and gravity.
Say if you were to orbit a black hole and someone was observing from farther away. If it took you an hour to orbit the black hole under an incredibly strong gravitational influence, it could take years from the observer's position under little to no gravity.
Time is relative because gravity warps spacetime.
>>696780497
>Futurama
>Walt Disney
>>696777777
ZOOMED WORDS
>>696779995
You are retarded, and don't even understand what you're replying to.
>>696778980
that's not time travel. that's two clocks representing two different times due to different forces acting upon them. Either one got sped up or slowed down. Neither reverted to their future or past states of matter.
Time travel definition:
the action of traveling through time into the past or the future.
Your bullshit clocks remained in their current state.
>>696781000
Go back to /r/spacedicks nigger.
>>696780874
Quantum computing only gives you an advantage for certain types of problems. It won't make Windows run faster.
The next step for general purpose computing is massive parallelism and a shift to optical processing. Don't expect optical processors for a long time, though.
If I made a really big stick that was 1 light years long, then did gif related, wouldn't the ends break light speed?
Checkmate atheists.
>>696781600
>The fucking autism
Not going to comments on your doubles?
Let me guess, you're probably trembling with excitement? Tipping your fedora? Getting hard maybe?
Fucking loser.
>>696781689
I'm getting pretty close to infinite mass.
>>696781689
Yeah that science teacher is an idiot. Nice mention of the Lorentz transformation . Not seen much. I have wondered though, if at the speed of light, can you pick a time to slowdown too? Is there a way to control where you come out. I contend there is.
>>696778502
>infinite universes
>universe
>uni
You see where this is going?
>>696780572
You can say that as many times as you like, it doesn't make it true
>>696781689
How does light travel at the speed of light without infinite mass then
>>696782132
I could have infinite unicycles.
What's your point?
>>696781946
The stick, at all locations, won't move at the same time.
>>696781959
Hi and welcome to 4chan, normie.
>>696782051
lol
>>696782220
It does have infinite mass, that's why it's so bright everywhere.
>>696781934
I know. I'm saying that there's no upper limit to what can be achieved, and it doesn't make sense that progress would slow down.
Just look at what we have now. Much of it science fiction 20 years ago.
>>696781946
well faggot, you have to take into consideration the size of the room you are in
do you fucking know how long one light year is?
>>696781804
>>696781907
you're still on theories? you're dumb. I don't give a shit what science says because it's all hypothetical bullshit and "educated" guesses at best. you don't understand what i'm saying therefore you should get off the IFLS website and think about what time is and if time travel were really possible. Then you'd understand that it's not. I've said what I have to say. It's your job to properly educate yourself. Good luck. You will need it.
>>696782220
Photons are massless. Energy = mass x speed of light squared. What's zero times anything?
>>696782334
It's solid metal though, no flex.
Checkmate.
>>696781344
Yeah, just like things didn't have sizes relative to each other until we measured them.
Fucking retard
>>696781946
Nope, cuz motion only transfers at the speed of sound in that specific material. So stick would break, but not the laws of physics. How bou't not checkmate, m8
>>696782432
365 days?
>>696782068
now things are getting interesting, you'd have to plan ahead to stop yourself somehow, also that is taking into account what consciousness is and whether it would exist once you'd get to your physical destruction but then again, us physicist like to contemplate this type of stuff.
>>696782282
Not that anon, but you really can't have infinite of anything. Mass is limited, at least in this universe
>>696779391
And he was basically correct.
>>696782407
Why is most of the universe dRk and empty then
>>696774196
I'm in the process of future traveling this very moment. I've actually been doing it my entire life.
>>696782435
Thanks for the copypasta mate
>>696782199
Time definition:
the indefinite continued progress of existence and events in the past, present, and future regarded as a whole
>PROGRESS OF EXISTENCE
>PROGRESS OF EXISTENCE
AKA CHANGE
AKA TIME IS A REPRESENTATION OF CHANGE.
>>696780152
And good luck "stopping", whatever that means.
>>696782557
actually ... I have a weird feeling sometimes that this true. I can't explain it, just a weird gut feeling.
>>696782697
I had infinite sex with ur mum last night.
>Mass is limited
Ya, cuz yur mum's fat ass is hogging it all
>>696773670
I'm a subscriber to string theory, which supports a time traveling to a previous time period a possibility, but not in the way you think.
If by chance you manage to generate enough energy and this into (Unspecified) power over X period of time to manipulate space-time. If you move your psychical body across this sea, you can only travel to the past/future of a different universe that is adjacent to the one you left among the infinite amount of universes present. You wouldn't be traveling into your own universe's timeline but a completely different one that you likely will have absolutely no investment in.
If any of this were true, you could do a double hop method in theory to travel into a different universe past, then travel back into the one you left but at an earlier time period.
But how would you even target a particular adjacent universe, its not like Universes' have serial codes or phone numbers you can dial, and how would you generate this energy in a different universe to make multiple trips cross the sea? For all we know the energy required would be compressing large stars by using a big star eating machine.
IMO i think time travel is possible, but as a one way trip into a place with no historical relevance to you or anyone. If by chance a person from the future is here, he is from a time and place likely much different from the history he knows. Making it a gigantic waste of time, resources, and kills hopes and dreams.
>>696782611
Kek'd and check'd
>>696782734
This is either bait, or you're just retarded.
>>696773670
Didn't Einstein have a theory that it was possible? But only possible going forward?
>>696782812
>Quantum.
There's no upper or lower limits
>>696782524
doesn't matter. pressure waves, if you will, don't travel instantaneously. when you start to exert a force at the center to rotate the rod, the center may start to rotate, but the ends won't until that force, or information, reaches them.
>>696781929
The clock didn't get sped up, do you even know how atomic clocks work?
We can measure atomic decay accurately. If you had uranium on a satellite for 10 years, when brought back to earth and measured, the rate if decay will be less than it should be for the amount of time passed in earth, so from the perspective of people on earth, that uranium is in a past state of matter relative to them because time is not constant.
>>696782652
>us physicists
You are in uni at best but any way.
It could be argued that once I reach the speed of light, only for a moment (very literal), I exist at all times....
Timelines as a tangible thing. Time as malleable. Strong minds and willpower. Drugs, tea, and rest.
>>696782282
Oh I get it, you're that guy
>>696783074
when you approach light speed, theoretically time slows for you but stays the same for everything else. essentially you move forward in time.
>>696782772
Yes, and with dilation, existence on Earth has progressed longer than it has for you.
What you're saying only makes sense if time is the same everywhere, which it's not
>>696782610
yes this. nice m8
>>696782784
Yeah I would agree but it has to be possible right? If I can go then I have to stop. I am going to have to think about that. If I move towards the center of the universe at the rate of expansion what is my speed?
>>696773670
IM SPEAKING OUT OF MY ASS HERE BUT
i was told that since time slows down as you travel closer to the speed of light (and stops when you're at it) that you could travel backwards in time if you could travel faster than the speed of light
>>696782962
Explain how he was wrong
>inb4 the iPhone
That's not an invention, faggot. Phones existed and the technology evolved.
>>696783190
You are fucking stupid this doesn't support time travel. It represents a single object moving at a slower rate than other things. That uranium is still in the present because scientists who borught it back from the satellite exist presently. Did scientists send that uranium into the past? Did scientists send that uranium into the future? No? Didn't think so. Have a seat buddy.
>>696783196
I'll give you that anon, am in uni for phd. and I hope you are actually right. Most physicists are "spiritual" i would say i'm religions, but i hate to admit that the only thing I can be sure of is that information cannot be destroyed and somehow when we die our consciousness will go out into space. Maybe the same thing.
>>696781946
>>696782334
>>696782432
>>696782610
Humor him. If it were unbreakable and he had the space and strength to wield such a stick.
>>696782610
Stick break make two stick, stick win every time
>>696780855
Good luck maintaining an orbit around the earth while cruising around at the speed of light.
>>696774383
The trick with time travel isn't to make yourself go backwards, it's to make everything else go forwards.
>>696773670
Just wait. You travel forward in time.
>>696775930
This is correct but pseudo intellectuals and redditfags worldwide will for the forseeable future continue to say time travel is a possibility.
Forward, sure, if we ever get shit that fast.
Backward? You're retarded.
>>696782875
>to string theory
>theory
Like it is sigular and there is a unidied string theory. Pro tip there is not.
>>696777468
It's not going to plateau, were at the beginning of an exponential spike that is going to Change the world so much that we can't even imagine our very near future.
>>696782875
What are the strings in string theory
>>696783607
I think that's more of an issue of... The faster I go, time slows down. When I reach speed of light, time stops. THEREFORE, if i go faster than the speed of light, it goes backwards. Seems like an issue of interpolating data. You cannot go faster than the speed of light.
>>696783618
You need to stop before you start typing in caps Timmy.
>>696783568
everything that currently exists is in the present state. nothing is in the past or future state. to say otherwise makes you look like an idiot. change happens in different rates in different areas of the universe. this doesn't support time travel. this means that the current matter in its current state and location may decay or change at a different rate but it didn't travel back or forward in time.
>>696783485
Ah yes. I think its called Time Dilation?
>>696783617
But the components that make a fucking iPhone were invented after 1899. Besides, an iPhone is almost hardly a phone at all.
There's even new materials, new elements. You're thick as shit.
>>696781109
Not enough banning to be /r/science.
>>696783617
Are you retarded.
What part of your iphone existed or was known to exist in 1899.
Also: information theory
>>696778053
Very nice boobies, would like to fondle and suckle.
>>696778597
fucking exactly
/thread
>>696783953
> I can sleep for 1 day and 1000 years have passed for everyone else
> claims this isn't a form of time travel.
Dumb cunt
>>696783485
You don't have to get anywhere near the speed of light, he'll two very accurate watches at top and bottom of a small mountain wI'll show it. Time dilation has been proven.
>>696781457
Ah yes, that's my work! I authored the Theory That My All Faggots.
>>696784265
I think GPS is a good example
>>696784205
> I can sleep for 1 day and 1000 years have passed for everyone else
where is your proof to support this. Show me proof, maybe an article, that this has happened. Show me proof of your claim. You can't, because it's a theory.
dumb cunt durrrr
So what I got from this thread is that time travel isn't actually possible.
Even if we sent a man in space, speeding around at the speed of light, the time for everyone else would pass as normally, while he zips around in space for a vast amount of time.
If that's the case then it just seems like a really overpriced and over complicated alternative to cryonics...
>>696781519
I'm going to guess that poster has abandoned the thread.
>>696783744
Wait up.
Hypothetical question:
If I stopped moving through time, and stayed in 2016 while everyone else would keep going, and I come back 100 years later, where would I be?
>>696784451
A theory is not a hypothesis.
Also, read about GPS and how the timing has to be adjusted.
>>696784033
My cock is thick as shit
>>696773670
Only to the future.
If you find a way to divide through zero, maybe also to the past.
I failed to realize how an atomic clock which slows the change of matter inside it means going back to the year 1923 or any other future/past date that is not the present date. atomic clocks are irrelevant.
>>696783617
I'm guessing you've got noting more to add to your retarded ramblings.
>>696776055
This. You can't go back in time before the time machine was invented. It would just take itself apart as you go back until it doesn't exist, and there you would be.
>>696784716
Excellent contribution, faggot.
>>696784689
>Also, read about GPS and how the timing has to be adjusted.
Also, tell me how that means we can travel back to the 1940's when hitler was ruling germany.
oh, you can't.
>>696784681
Where would you be as in physical location?
>>696784989
Did I say that, you fucking retard? You're grasping at straws.
I was referring to this point
> I can sleep for 1 day and 1000 years have passed for everyone else
>>696784989
True. These relativistic differences only produce a "traveling into the future" effect. It does not account for anything dealing with traveling into the past.
ITT: i proved all your bullshit theories about atomic clocks and uranium on a satellite to be ignorat. none of these theories support a possible change in all current existing matter to revert to a previous state. Such as us going back to 1940's when hitler ruled germany.
IRL: Time travel is not possible. You have yet to prove me wrong.
Time Travel is possible and has all ready happened and will continue to happen
>Before big bang all matter in universe was uniform in energy and mass
>Matter collects via gravity
>so much that the shit explodes creating everything
>Hydrogen turns to helium, then from there all other mater
>life forms
>we make this thread
>we die
>heat death, all matter reaches a uniform level of heat and mass
>big crunch happens again
>since there would be no outside forces acting on the explosion everything reforms in the exact same way
>life forms the same
>we remake this thread
>we die
>heat death back to the top and repeat forever
>>696785154
No, as in what time period would I be in. I would still be in 2016, right? Will anyone be there with me?
>>696785212
then i guess your shitty theory doesn't support time travel!
you still have yet to give me an article or show me proof of an object or person that has slept for 1 day and 1000 years passed for everyone else.
Protip: Futurama is just a cartoon
>>696785339
What's this all about now?
>>696782220
It really doesn't have any other options.
Thread dying because nobody can prove time travel is possible, but I prove it's impossible and ignorant.
>>696783844
>Like it is sigular and there is a unidied string theory.
wat....
You mean a singular and unified string theory? I know there isn't, I use it as an umbrella term because IDGAF since it will likely always just be a theory. I don't believe we will ever develop the instruments or even have the real capacity to understand how to make it into real science text.
But I like to believe that there is some merits to that direction of scientific exploration.
>>696782435
retard alert
>>696773670
Looking at pictures and videos is literally looking at a past point in time that was captured. I'm sure there exists a way to interact with the past or even go back completely. You know that people have definitely made serious attempts to do so. The only truth is that if they were successful, they would never tell anyone.
>>696785806
insults because you have nothing intelligent to say.
>>696785558
It's a fucking FACT. Read about GPS, that proves it, you dipshit.
If you were travelling fast enough, that's what would happen.
Time dilation, mofo.
Also, you're a stupid cunt; too stupid to realise that you're arguing with several people.
>>696773670
The law of conservation of mass and energy dictates that matter cannot "vanish" from a point on the space-time continuum and "reappear" at a different location.
Having said that, time seems to speed up or slow down depending on velocity, but time travel is fucking nonsense.
>>696784418
I think mountains are a better fucking example it is why I used them. It show on this world something he can do and see real results. He will probably have trouble launching a satellite, and I don't have time to explain obital mechanics. So mountains are a good fucking example.
>>696782524
Yeah, metal doesn't flex. That's why we've never been able to shape it into anything useful, like rods 1-lightyear in length.
>>696773670
No.
If it was, there would already be people here from the future.
>>696786010
>This. Fucking this. This guy gets it.
If you argue otherwise, you are an imbred cousin fucker.
>>696782611
No.
>>696785212
I'm still waiting on the article about a person who traveled 1000 years in 1 day. Let's see it.
Pro tip: it doesn't exist because it's a theory.
>>696786006
>*cries* it's a fact! it's a fact! it proves time travel!
>has no proof. just assumptions.
>>696785457
This is the only answer
>>696786190
Sure. I've just never heard of too many examples using mountains. I personally just heard GPS used as a more common example is all. But I see what you're saying
English wheelchair guy challenged physisists to prove time travel was blocked by the laws of physics as we currently understand them. They could not, so time travel remains a theoretical possibility as does achieving an erection while listening to Hillary.
>>696786529
It was a fucking example to prove a point. You've got to be baiting at this point. If you'd bothered to read up on time dilation, you would see that it's possible if we could travel fast enough, and there's plenty of real-life examples of it working on a smaller scale.
this
>>696779050
was my point of timetravel.
>>696786529
You're fucking stupid, the "sleep for 1 day, 1000 years pass" is hypothetical
>>696786719
I didn't say it proves time travel, you dipshit. Read about time dilation. Assuming you can read above the ability of a five year old.
>>696777777
>>696786912
I would hate fuck the shit out of that old hag.
>>696783588
If you're moving toward the center of he universe, you're still moving. And if you could straddle the exact center of the universe without moving, you'd still be moving away from objects at the far edges of the universe, and even your atoms would be moving relative to one another as the space between them increases due to the expansion of the universe.
>>696784451
Thread asked if it's possible, not if it's been done.
>>696787004
>>696787091
>>696787233
no real evidence just assumptions and examples written on napkins.
you are stupid as fuck.
>>696787004
show me a real life example of it working on a smaller scale. also, your sleep for 1 day, 1000 years pass theory is a stupid theory because it does not prove time travel.
L
>>696785457
>>696785457
>>696785457
>>696785457
>>696785457
>>696785457
>>696785457
>>696787004
it represents change of a single object or person, not a change in time as a whole.
time travel: going forward or backwards to a different point in time.
>>696788007
I'm so done. There's no point discussing it with someone so dense. Read about time dilation, you'll find everything you need to know there.
Also, go fuck yourself.
