Even after countless killings the US does nothing about it. why not ban high capacity magazines, are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers? Fuck you
>>695647671
Piss off
>>695647671
are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers?
>Yes, yes they are.
Next question?
>>695647957
This is the moron that own guns, this is how a gun owner thinks, unfucking believable
Over population IS a serious concern, mass shootings only help us keep a manageable population
Rip my nigga harambe
>>695647671
Weak bait, OP.
>>695648998
word
>>695647671
Ban anything you want. Psychos still exist and they'll still find a way. Next you'll be banning tools and kitchen utensils.
Faggot.
>>695647671
Why not ban bars? It would save 1000's of lives if you banned drinking anywhere but home. Or how about swimming pool? Is swimming really more important than little kids lives?
>>695647671
>>695648431
Cunt, its not the guns, its the person holding the gun. The gun doesnt kill by itself..
So what about banning vehicles? Or trucks, since people tend to drive through a crowd of other people with em..
>>695647671
How would banning them change anything? Simply banning then does not change the fact that I have 15 loaded 30 round magazines and 4, 40 round magazines. It only changes who I let see then while I shoot targets. My brother lives in California and he has a hand full of 30 round magazines from before the Bann was inacted. My point being banning them doesn't get rid of them, it just removes them from plain sight (making the libtards feel safer).
>>695649326
Your right we shouldn't even bother having laws.
Some asshole will just break them.
>>695648809
Except that the population in the u.s. is not the problem.
Our population growth, like most other industrialized nations, is negative. The real problem are the africans, the indians, and the chinese (because of recently removed population control)
>>695647671
yes, i know it's a troll. but...
killers will kill. it may make some brain dead dickheads feel good to blame an inanimate object, that makes them feel like they have done something, like they have "made a difference"
yes, my civil rights (and i do have them even though i'm not black) do mean more than butchering the constitution over a minuscule percentage of wrongdoers. i notice your picture does not include the 50 niggers that killed other niggers in Chicago yesterday with guns they owned illegally. why is that?
in 2 words, fuck you
>>695647671
Sandy hook didnt happen
>>695649714
That faggot in France mowed a shit load of people down with a truck. Funny enough you have a higher chance of getting hit by a vehicle than being shot by a gun. The faggot who was driving the truck proved that statistic to be true.
>>695649667
Let's outlaw rape, that way the amount of rape from the rapefugees will decrease... O wait it is illegal and the rapefugees are still raping.
>>695649569
Guns are intended to kill people, trucks are not, we can't just make trucks or cancer illegal
>Op jelly because their country won't allow them to own a gun
>>695647671
I wholeheartedly agree, OP. Guns need to be forcefully taken away from the populace so that noble arms smugglers may work to feed their children, and to where private militias can safely train on their soil.
>>695647671
>are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers?
Literally yes
If not guns, psychos will use knives (like what happens in China and Japan a lot) or axes (Germany) or even just a fucking box truck (France)
This is one of our problems right here. Niggers acting like out of control monkeys
Lol, yeah, high capacity magazines are the problem.
If you band high capacity magazines, all anyone has to do to shoot alot of people is carry a few extra revolvers with higher powered boolets
>>695650523
Don't forget a pressure cooker bomb like in boston.
>>695650777
trips speak the truth
This blows any gun control argument out of the water.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8hyQDQPEsrs
>>695647671
Let's not forget that islam is NOT to blame.
>>695650421
Guns are not "intended to kill people". Like anything else, different types of guns have different uses. Some are made for hunting, some are made for sidearms, some are made for self defense, and others are made for military use. However, they (almost) all can be used recreationally, at a shooting range for example.
>>695650421
Guns are intended to protect one's life and liberties.
>>695651053
Yeah, it's not Islams fault. It's ISLAMS fault.
>>695651053
Also don't forget that BlackLivesMatter isn't to blame, because that would be racist.
Even though they've killed probably close to 40 or 50 police officers in the past couple of months.
Also black on black violence and gang violence is off limits, because that's racist too. Even though it makes up for a huge percentage of the murder rate.
Name one country that has banned guns and seen significant declines in murder, crime, terrorism, or suicide.
HARD MODE:
Only racially diverse countries permitted
>>695651496
Australia.
>>695651496
France!
Wait, no...
Australia!
Wait, not them either....
Germany?
Nope.
I give up, this is too hard
>>695651676
HAHAHAHAAAA
Did you even try to look?
>>695647671
>insert statistics showing niggers are the cause of most gun violence here
>insert articles showing vast majority of shootings happen in gun free zones (aka zones where guns have already been banned) here
>insert crime reports in areas like UK where guns have been banned and people are still killing each other here
>insert picture of OP being a faggot here
Can't be bothered to read the whole thread to see if it's been pointed out or not, but states which have already banned hi-cap magazines do NOT have a lower gun related homicide rate. I'm not necessarily against banning them, I just don't see it working.
>>695651676
Not in the least.
If you're not concealed carrying, you're asking to be murdered.
Remember kids, when seconds count, police are only minutes (or hours, or days) away!
>>695652042
>I'm not against banning them
>I just don't see (banning them) working
Ok so if it doesn't work, then why ban them?
Also 30 rounds in not """""high-capacity""""" for most semi-automatic rifles, it's standard capacity
>>695647671
>Guns are legal
<.01% of the population is killed each year
>Guns are illegal
The government has nothing to stop it from oppressing, enslaving, and killing innocent Americans.
>.01% of the population is killed each year
we're americans, why would we ever want to stop killing each other. Take away the guns, and we'll still keep killing each other
>>695647671
We'll ban guns as soon as France bans trucks.
>>695651205
Same exact argument goes for knives, many uses, but all can be used to kill. No one seams to be outlawing knives, or axes, or pressure cookers, or fucking box trucks. Yet they all can be used to harm people
>>695652575
Just because I'm not vehemently against something, doesn't mean I'm in favor of it. It wouldn't bother me significantly because it doesn't affect me. I carry a 5 round 357 and have a 12 gauge by my bed. Plus, I could sell my 100 30 round magpul mags for some serious cash if they were banned.
>>695647671
Why don't we ban the Sandy hoax and the MKUltra killers
>>695647671
Why don't you ban trucks Euro Cuck.
Dumbasses...
>>695651676
Australia is literally the example used by statisticians to show how banning guns does not cause a reduction in murder you fucking shitbrained faggot.
here you go faggots
my faggot state just banned assault rifles today. Fuck I hate Mass
>>695653006
although I to would not enjoy seeing a gun ban, you have to admit that in the case of firearms, its not as simple as those other items. But I do agree with you.
>>695653074
It wouldn't effect me either, I would simply carry on shooting targets with my "high capacity" magazines on my property where trespassers will be shot for tresspassing.
Make gun ownership taxable like property or vehicles. Own whatever you want. The higher the caliber or capacity, the more you pay, and you pay insurance EACH year like a tax. Anyone caught without insurance or possessing an illegal firearm regardless is a crime has committed gets an automatic jail sentence of 10 years. Anyone committing any crime with the use of a firearm, life. Anyone murdered with the use of a firearm, automatic death penalty.
>>695647671
when guns will be banned people will kill using poisons/cars/bombs/autism
>>695653330
Assault rifles or "assault weapons?" Because those are two totally different things.
>>695653006
My point exactly. Almost anything can kill easily if it is used to kill. Murderers will always exist, and banning things won't stop themm
>>695653330
That sucks bro. Can't you go out of state and buy an AR private sale then come back into the state?
>>695653579
don't forget to tax free speech, it's also a constitutional right.
>>695647671
>are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers?
Yes. Yes they are. On the upside, if Democrats would stop shooting people we could cut gun crimes by 90%. I say we ban Democrats.
>>695650539
>Antonio Santiago
>white
>>695653330
Oh god I lived there for a year and a half. Fucking disgusting state. Get the fuck out of there anon. Move down south.
>>695647671
0/10 trollling
my guns aren't going to be pointed at any preschoolers, you need to worry about the guns in the hands of crazy fucks.
Keep it real holmez.
>>695653528
But, also, are we to assume that they're referring to hi-cap as anything above 10? If that's the case, I can see a whole lot of people getting really pissed.
>>695653848
>Democrats
We all know which Democrats those are. I say we ban black people.
>>695653330
rip, another state has fallen to the cuck
https://discord.gg/VRrGY
Nice join dude!
>>695649569
A car has purposes other than shooting living creatures or targets.
When a gun can carry millions of people to their jobs, or nessecary materials across countries get back to me with that lack of a point.
>>695647671
Why should the many be punished for the crimes of the few?
The number of killings from homicides stays close to 10,00 every year. As a matter of fact given the rate or population growth, it has been dramatically shrinking.
Citizens owning guns capable of stopping a government sponsored fascist take over or foreign invasion is an important element to the equation. You want a government made of citizens that can always reclaim their power.
>>695653813
You're an idiot. We ragulate and tax everything else, drugs, liquor, cigarettes, automobiles, and they all have the capacity to "kill" but we don't regulate what kills the most effectively and that's weapons. I'm not calling for a ban. I'm saying tax the fuck out it and make those that want it pay for it.
>>695653680
Yeah - but guns just make it that much more convenient. Wanna kill someone? Bang, 1/5th of a second and gone.
I'm with Jim fuckin' Jeffries on this one give everyone a musket. The good thing about muskets is you get time to calm the fuck down.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0rR9IaXH1M0
>>695653579
I like where your going with the sentencing but your idea incriminates alot of people who have good intentions. The libtards would never go for the death penalty idea although it is a good one. We couldn't afford to imprison that many people. Most of the imprisoned people would be the good heated people who refuse to pay tax and insurance.
>>695654281
10,000*
Any gun restrictions will not stop a damn thing
>>695654073
why ban them? we just need to hold out a little longer until the race war starts, and us armed fuckers will outlast the cuckfags, dune coons and the nignogs
>>695653941
fuqit, this is now a boom thread
A-10 up your ass holmez
>>695647671
>are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers
Yeah the right to bear arms is more important than a few kids or an old fuck praying
>>695654532
talk brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrt to me
>>695653579
The problem with that (aside from the fact that it's stupid) is that you're relying on the government adequately punishing people who break that law. But the government already fails to sufficiently punish those who actually use guns to commit crimes. You're supposed to get 20 like, 20 in prison for illegally carrying a gun without a permit, but most people (even felons and repeat offenders) usually get less than 3 years. Maybe that's why so many people abuse firearm laws, the punishments are weak.
>>695654359
Dan pls go
>>695654359
>The good thing about muskets is you get time to calm the fuck down.
i hope you have a musket when the nigger that just busted your front door down has a glock. fuck your stupidity and lack of will to protect yourself and your loved ones
>>695654359
But if you're really crazy, you would much rather kill more than one person in that 1/5 of a second with a pressure cooker bomb. Those two idiot mudslimes figured out how to fashion a pressure cooker bomb. It can't be to terribly hard to make one.
>>695654359
If there were any validity to your claim, you would be able to do more than theory craft, and provide statistics.
Repeat after me:
GUN BANS DO NOT REDUCE CRIME.
GUN BANS DO NOT REDUCE MURDER.
GUN BANS DO NOT REDUCE TERRORISM
GUN BANS DO NOT REDUCE SUICIDE.
GUN BANS DO NOT FORCE PEOPLE TO GET ALONG.
>>695647671
IT'S NOT WURF IT!
>>695654736
Hell, the government is pretty darn good at breaking laws themselves
>>695654726
I believe I dropped something
>>695654359
Well, if something is outlawed, it's outlaws that will use it. Crime will still be nearly the same, but the black market will thrive
>>695647671
>innocent church goers
lol they were black how could they be innocent?
>>695654390
Make no mistake. We PAY for Liberty. This whole notion of inaliable rights is bullshit. I understand your point but it's always been the middle class that gets fucked. The rich opt out because of wealth and the poor are too marginalized to ever be blamed because they think everyone is out yo get them anyway. In reality it's always been the middle class that's the bulk of people that are not only punished for wanting justice, but have to shell out the dough to do so.
>>695654390
you're all missing the whole point. the government wants anyone that would oppose them disarmed. notice how these laws and penalties wouldn't effect people that don't obey the law to begin with, and they are by definition, the ones doing the killing. what the fuck, are people this stupid that they can't see this? if i don't obey a law that says don't murder, why would i obey a law that says i can't have a gun?
>>695653579
Hey buddy
Here's a better idea
Go fuck yourself, your opinion doesn't mean shit
>>695654736
plus there's the fact that there are too many people in prisons already
>>695654262
Cannons have wheels. Can ride to work. Fuck you.
>>695655282
I'm not your buddy fag. Get your head out of your ass. Your relatives are wondering where you've been.
>>695647671
we need high capacity magazine to PROTECT ourselves from people who can also get high capacity magazines.
>>695647671
This may be one of the stupidest things I've seen all day, good job.
>>695651781
Canada.. Boom loser ass murdering fagoot monkeys
>>695647671
People kill people, not guns.
If not a gun, a bomb, chemical, etc..
At least with guns we know and can resolve the issue in short order
>>695647671
when terrorism first started the whole world didnt try to ban bombs because either way terrorists are going to find a way to kill people. This whole surge of everyone trying to take our guns away is completely unrelated to a real threat and is definitely the government successfully disarming every state one by one
If guntards can't accept high capacity mags have no place outside a battlefield then there's point trying to argue with them
>>695655328
I agree. We should get rid of the prisoners that are in for minor drug related offenses (like selling pot?), execute the people guilty of double homicides and such, and then we'd have room for real violent offenders.
>>695655440
Once you have a motorized vehicle that is also a cannon get back to me.
Oh wait, that's a tank. Which is pretty illegal for the average person to own.
>>695650421
the point is people are going to find a way no matter what idiot. i would rather have a gun to defend myself and IN FACT the ar 15 is designed to mare not to kill get your facts straight
>>695647671
You're the type of person who relies on other people. What will taking guns away from people solve? People will still get killed.
"A gun is intended to kill, a vehicle is not". Lmao. Have you been to a destruction derby, a vehicle is fully capable of killing. As a matter of fact people die all the time in vehicle related incidents, LOL. more so than mass shootings!
>>695649587
not to mention now everyone is going to have 50 10 round mags taped to each other. low capacity mags literally dont solve anything at all the people who make these laws dont know a single thing about guns
>>695656131
Actually no they're not, you just have to register them as destructive devices and pay a tax.
Making them road-worthy is a different story, but it can be and is done.
>>695656131
Shouldn't be. It can carry people to work. Very useful.
>>695656021
What point does it become high capacity? Why does that matter? Reloading takes only a few seconds and previous events have shown that shooters using smaller mags (In accordance with the AWB) did nothing to reduce their ability to kill.
>>695656131
https://www.quora.com/Can-you-legally-drive-a-tank-on-the-roads-of-the-US
>>695652042
Simply banning them doesn't get rid of them it just prohibits the sale of new ones. It means California still has a few million (rough estimate) 30 round magazines floating around behind closed doors. But the libtards are happy because they feel like they had a victory
>>695647671
>WWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
>SOMEONE ELSE IS DOING WHAT THEY WANT IN THEIR COUNTRY AND I CANT CONTROL IT
Here's my standard capacity 20 round FAL mags
And that's only one of my guns
>>695656021
If retards can't accept that banning shit will accomplish literally nothing, then there's no point in arguing with them.
Faggot.
>>695650068
THIS IS SOOO TRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU
>>695656476
If it saves life and adds seconds for people to run, it matters. There's no fucking argument for them
>>695656476
precisely I mean look at that asshat Cho. His guns were .22lr, 10 round clips.
>>695655978
Are you fucked? Bombs are certainly illegal
>>695654987
ditto
>>695656131
actually it's not
I can own a tank any time, the gun simply needs to be registered
Here's most of my guns
Missing a few I've picked up recently
I agree, only government officials should have weapons.
>>695656562
ah, my nigga. and .30 cal man. my hat's off. i'm 7.62 x 51 as well
>>695656562
>tfw you'll never be Rhodesian
>tfw you'll never be a man among men
Just kill me now fam
>>695647671
I don't understand how people like you are so damn clueless. Most criminally used weapons are not bought at your local gun store but are black marketed. Why give up my magazine capacity in order to give criminals the advantage of having twice as many bullets as I do? You do realize hundreds of people are saved each day by gun owners in the US.
>>695656021
High capacity mags?, Really?, Most mass shootings and crimes are committed with standard pistols, not assault rifles or pistols with extended mags.
>>695647671
FOOOD FOR MOTHER FUCKING THOUGHT!!!
Every tragic event where people have died in a mass scale is BECAUSE none of those poor american citizens were armed at the time. It is a proven statistic that the amount of people that die during a shooting is greatly increased when police are the ones to end the situation rather than if an armed citizen removed the threat from the situation. The real fucking problem is that not enough citizens carry guns on the daily. get fucking real you guys are blind
>>695656987
where'd you get the flag
I need one
>>695649555
amazing point duis are second degree murder now if under the influence in cali
>>695656753
It adds maybe 3 seconds. No matter how fast someone runs they will not outrun a bullet.
There's no argument against restricting magazine size and you still didn't answer my question about what classifies as "high capacity".
>>695656756
Exactly. Or the guys at Columbine who were using guns that were made to be compliant with the AWB. Shit, one of them was using a double barreled shotgun.
>>695656865
Forgot pic
>>695657132
That's not my picture, sorry
That either came from Google or >>>/k/
>>695656832
didn't you play fallout too much? what do you do with that arsenal invade canada?
It's surprising how much /b/ has changed
Just last year I would come here to post guns and troll /b/ and now most of them you are pro gun
I'm proud
>>695656832
Sick FAL
Also gun control is bulls hit
Ex: OKC bomber, Nice France, Turkish Airport, Paris Attacks. I can go on
>are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers?
I think you answered your own question, faggot.
>>695649326
Ban psychos
Most of the US is basically composed of assholes who hate everyone not in their immediate circle.
Hence the insane gun laws.
>>695647671
why do u blame the gun and not the person who did it? guns don't kill people. People kill people.
one irresponsible gun owner does not represent the other 100 million other law abiding gun owners, including myself.
read the 2nd amendment again. right to bare arms shall not be infringed.
pic related : high capacity mag
>>695647671
Look. If we're scared shitless about mass shootings, ban magazine-fed semiautomatic rifles. It won't work, but folks will feel better about themselves. A bunch of people killed by an illegal gun makes it much better than a bunch of people killed by an illegal one.
If you want to ban something to try to solve the bigger problem- ban handguns. They kill many times more people annually than rifles.I don't think that would help, but it would be less retarded than banning high capacity magazines and jerking ourselves off about what a great job we did.
The magazine ban expired because even the most die-hard libtards couldn't find any stats to support their ban.
No other country has the same gun problems as america
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_school_shootings_in_the_United_States
>>695657395
>foreigner who thinks he understands american history and culture
>>695657156
>one of them was using a double barreled shotgun.
that just gives them excuse to BAN EVERYTHING!!!
hell, i'm wearing a SAA on my hip at this moment, but that wouldn't be allowed, you know it
I don't think you anti gun fucks understand why the 2nd amendment exists, it isn't to protect us from other citizens, it's to protect us from our own government.
>>695655152
> Implying illegal guns would never get taken out of circulation
> implying black market isn't just shit stolen by people using firearms
> implying americans aren't the ones flooding the world with the guns anyway
Yeah it's not gonna start out perfect. Of course crims won't hand in guns, shit takes time and effort
>>695650722
seriously tho its well documented even in video that a new york reload is 100 percent more deadly and faster than a high capacity mag
>>695657573
tbh, its really because of the nigga population. statistics support this.
>>695647671
If we ban anything related to guns, think of what will happen.
What the fuck has happened to every thing addictive, fun, or dangerous, that we outlawed?
That's right, it turned into a black market, injecting nigger gangs and random fucks with cold hard cash for selling what people want.
So if you really give a shit about peace and order, you'll know that the cleanest and most optimal solution is not to create another fucking black market.
>>695657320
>invade canada?
EXCELLENT IDEA
Oh man! If only there was a law against killing other people!
>>695657472
>read the 2nd amendment again. right to bare arms shall not be infringed.
That's not the 2nd amendment, dumbass.
It's "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
>>695656832
What the fuck is that rifle second from the bottom? Looks like an improvised weapon or a beating stick. Nice collection btw
Here in Canada, you can only own long guns. It is VERY rare that somebody is driving around with a 308 under their seat and shoots people with it. Any restricted weapons (assault rifles, hand guns, and any weapon whose sole purpose is to stealthily have the ability to kill people as soon as your loose screw falls out) are very strictly monitored by police. You are issued a transport permit, which only allows you to carry it to a specific range. It must be locked, not readily available, and ammunition stored separately. This is, in my opinion, an effective way to make sure I don't get shot over some road rage. Pretty sure I'll be long gone when I see him unlocking his glock and slowly loading his ammunition into the mags. Also, if you're caught breaking these rules, you lose all your guns FOREVER. Owning guns should be a privilege for honest and responsible people, not an incentive for opening a bank account
>>695656987
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QVCzYLxBK74
>>695657638
>it's to protect us from our own government
this man understands, would that the rest of you dumbfucks did
>>695657832
pipe shotgun
>>695649555
ha this
>>695657472
Yet the libtards are quick to say one terrorist doesn't represent all mudslimes
>>695657841
yeah except your niggers in Ontario don't give a fuck and roll with guns anyway
>>695657814
wow.. no fucking shit dude....
>>695657581
>idiot american clueless that he's responding to a more clever american
And to add to that, I feel perfectly safe knowing that someone isnt going to pump 7 rounds in me when I'm least expecting it. I walk around totally unarmed and never feel unsafe in my country. Can you pleb say that for the US? Didn't think so
>>695657581
america has history? 200 years are not history, is just a hiccups
>>695658127
Don't live in one of 10 cities and you don't have that problem
>>695647671
these are the cases that the media glorifies. MOST THE GUN VIOLENCE IN THE US IS BLACK ON BLACK CRIME.
>>695657758
LOOOOL
>>695657814
I think this guy was just born yesterday
>>695657925
Would you dumbfucks understand for one second that 1 singular F-16 on an aircraft carrier is enough to destroy every local militia. This isn't the 1800s, fucking tech advanced beyond consumer availability
>>695657594
They could have been using a Brown Bess musket and bayonet and they still would have killed people. Want to know why?
Because they were in GUN FREE ZONE. A place where law abiding citizens, in their efforts to obey the law, are left to be defenseless because idiotic lawmakers think a sign will deter criminals. Want to end mass shootings? Don't ban guns or restrict magazine sizes, abolish the concept of a gun free zone and let people defend themselves.
>>695657925
Person you responded to here, not to be rude, but I have no fucking clue what you were trying to say at the end there.
>>695657341
Now we're making progress!
Obama has ordered more deaths than all those mentally ill combined.
>>695658084
Smuggled in from the US.
Just throwing this out there, but if you cut off everyones hands they cannot use a weapon.
>>695658060
English please.
One terrorist does not represent all... let me guess... Muslims? This is..... True........?
>>695647671
Banning high capacity magazines is the answer to the problem? High capacity magazines have nothing to do with it. I'm not going to waste my time typing up a big reply as to what I think the answer is. I just wanted to call you out on your faggotry for such a idiotic statement
>>695658224
>is enough to destroy every local militia.
Are you going to start taking out skyscrapers just to take out the militia?
Are you really going to destroy your own factories, supermarkets, and infrastructure just to stop THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED YOU from fighting you?
Are you really going to kill your own people to save them?
Because that's dystopian as fuck you disingenuous cocksucker
>>695658127
Yes I can
>>695658224
>>695658291
Smuggled in from the entire world
>>695658233
dude, you are preaching to the choir. you may have misunderstood my post
>>695658224
>being this stupid
>>695657985
Haha nice. I remember seeing a homemade pipe shotgun using a staple gun and a metal pipe. They welded a piece of drill bit to the plunger, then welded the staple gun to a handle, the the barrel pivoted up to reload.
>>695656806
There are numerous countries that have enforced gun bans in the last century.
Only one of them, japan, has seen correlation with decreases in crime and murder.
No other country has seen significant reductions.
I'd provide links, but I'm on a mobile device and it's easier for you to just google "Do gun bans reduce crime?"
>>695658092
apparently that idiot thinks you cannot paraphrase.
ITT: A bunch of autists think that they can stop law breakers from breaking the law by writing more laws instead of enforcing the ones they have.
>>695658224
Hows that war on terror going, against a bunch of guys with 30 year old soviet rifles.
>>695658374
>Can't ever beat a single plane
>Expects people to side with you to do what Palestinian terrorists do till the end of time to survive against 1 plane
>>695658224
youll see drones outfitted with rpg's before an f16 intimidates any of the 50 states.
>>695658448
Sorry. I think I did misunderstand.
>>695649667
Lol, 2 true
>>695653006
In civilized countries, carrying a knife is illegal - if you have a knife on you on the street, you are planning to stab someone even if in self defense. guns whole purpose is to shoot bullets at hypersound velocities, if you find any day-to day use like cutting a tomato or chopping down trees or playing a sport like baseball with a fucking precision murder weapon, let me know. So far this fear of government take over is controlling your stupid heads. You do realize your handguns won't protect you vs army which will shoot to kill on sight anyone with a weapon. They will expect everyone to have guns so will use precaution and just tank the shit out of your house if they realize you are going to protect yourself. guns don't kill people, 4 year olds, mass murderers and incompetent gun owners kill people. I'm sure if they had a knife they would have managed to murder others with the same speed and same quantities. Guy with a hatchet chops people on the train. Let me know how many died ? 0 , yes some are in critical condition, but if he had a rifle, you know, look at your country's news and estimate how many families would have lost their loved ones in a matter of minutes. after the incident no one said - get yourself a hatchet to protect yourself from other hatchet wielding crazies. but in united shits of murritards you are actually stupid enough to believe that you will have a chance to protect yourself against a shooter. no wonder you have a broke , reality show star as a nominee for your president. you are a nation of rednecks and always were. make america great again, said only the old people who lived in the 50s and had a good Fallout level of life, with racial discrimination and other bullshit that everyone was ignoring on purpose just to keep discriminating. Shoot yourselves, inbreds.
Why not simply ban black people?
>>695658354
>One terrorist does not represent all...
On the contrary one terrorist does represent all terrorists. It's you liberal fucks that belive one terrorist doesn't represent all mudslimes.
>>695658224
Honestly if the people are simply refusing to do something, not actively trying to harm the government, that might be more effort it than
It's worth since you probably. Just destroy all the land and have a bunch of dead people now.
>>695647671
I believe in the eternal spirit of Adolf Hitler. And he tells me to keep my guns so I may defend the fatherland against all invaders.
Why not ban celebrities from getting to have opinions on politics?
I have a question
>>Right to bare arms in order to ensure a proper militia
>>This right is granted by the government
>>A militia fights for the government
>>The state is trying to take my guns away
>>The state has no right to take my guns away because the state says I have a right to them incase I need to defend the state
Am I missing something?
>>695658224
this is the same type of person that brags about how a bunch of vietcong "farmers" fought the US army and marines to a standstill and eventually won the war in the tet offensive. way to be consistant asshole
>>695658726
Best suggestion in the thread. But the libs would never go for it because they would be all out of black cock to suck
>>695658382
Well I hope for your sake you don't become a statistic like the rest of your shirt country. The fact that Donald trump is even being considered is a testament to how fucked all of you are
>>695658511
>Only one of them, japan, has seen correlation with decreases in crime and murder.
that's because it's a homogeneous society. they also have tenticle porn. want that?
>>695658704
when someone is right, is right
>>695654532
>>695658606
>said plane will run out of fuel
>said plane will run out of ammunition
>said plane will need ground crew and support to keep flying
>said plane will need to be maintenanced
Go be stupid somewhere else
>>695647671
anyone who believes guns are the problem are literally blind and literally LITERALLY retarded.
GUNS PREVENT VIOLENCE
and every mass shooting is proof of that.
Have you seen a shooting in a police station? what about an nra meeting? does violence occur in front of your neighbors house who is known to be loaded with guns? when was the last MASS SHOOTING in compton? never. no
instead shootings happen: at schools, at church, at concerts, everywhere where it is already banned
everywhere with the least resistance
open your fucking pathetic eyes people
>>695658793
yes the right to bear arms to also to protect yourself, your family, your property, and your well being.
>>695658673
no prob
>>695647671
>>695647671
im an american born and raised and i really hate this country for more reasons than just this
>>695658511
It worked in Japan because they all just kill themselves instead.
>>695659115
but if those attacking you didnt have guns, then you wouldnt need guns to defend yourself...
>>695659115
From other people with guns... how does that make sense
Gun laws have been proved to be very effective in many country...but usa fags don't seem to understand?how do you guys feel when you send your child at school and they teach them mass shooting drill?u.s.a look like the middle east right now...Guns are not a problem? Prove it please..
>>695659112
i cant even begin to tell you how ignorant you are peasant
>>695658792
I think we should ban armed security for anyone who wants to ban guns.
>>695658224
fdsa
Fuck it, lets go full police state. Regular random inspections of homes for weapons, confiscations of contraband.
While we're at it we need a curfew as well. Anybody outside in the dark is obviously plotting to rob somebody.
>>695659115
Where in the second amendment does it mention family?
>>695659262
If someone is thinking of killing a family, the do not give a fuck about gun laws retard.
>>695658224
asdf
>>695647671
Hey you forgot this faggot!! Regulating guns isn't going to do shit to anyone that wants to get one so what's the fucking difference? They made drugs illegal and now no one does illegal drugs.
>>695658793
>This right is granted by the government
this right is not granted by the government. go back and read the constitiution and look up the definition of inalienable rights. the constitution does not grant the government power, it limits the governments power. that's why the left hates it like they do.
>>695659188
Move to mexico then.
They have super tight gun laws down there so that means there is no gun crime!
>>695658793
>>>This right is granted by the government
Rights are not granted by the government. They were preexisting rights all men have.
The Constitution sets limits on government, not on the people.
>>695659115
And honestly, I know you're going to say that bad guys will have guns anyways. Well here in Canada eh, we just jump.out a window and call the police, then they go to jail for 15 years. Sounds better than getting into a gun fight I may and probably will lose (since I'm. Not that experienced in shooting peope)
>>695651995
>insert crime reports of Australia where gun control laws have pretty much completely eradicated gun homicide, especially in comparison to US
>>695648431
Fuck off
>>695658748
Not really. Anything can be a terrorist. My son is a terrorist. My penis is a terrorist to my wifes pussy. Not all terrorists represent all "terrorists".
Al qaeda and isis may have the same objective, but they don't represent eachother....
>>695659317
the states or federal government dont have the right to tell you that you are not capable of defending yourself against someone who is armed.
>>695647671
We only care about ourselves.
Welcome to America.
>>695655796
canada doesnt even count as a country gtfo
>>695659339
Nice, France... Proven...
>>695659586
>gun control laws have pretty much completely eradicated gun homicide
>gun homicide,
Why do you have to cherry pick just "Gun" homicides out of that?
What about all the other crime rates. Did they go up or down?
>>695647671
This is OP posting this thread every single fucking hour of every single fucking day. Fuck off back to Fucklandia please.
>>695659115
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zE0K22zH8
>>695658793
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zE0K22zH8
>>695659262
there are hundreds of millions of guns in existence. you can't just wish them away. if we can't find 10 million illegal mexicans then we damn sure can't round up hundreds of millions of illegal guns. or doesn't your logic hold to this level?
>>695659586
>gun homicide
It's cute how liberals don't care about people being murdered. They only care that they're not getting shot.
Ban gun free zones.
>>695647671
Gun huggers have little penises
>>695655796
Yeah you guys just got BTFO by the RCMP.
Whats that you own a 11+ round mag for a ruger 10/22? Better hand it over before you get sent to jail!
>>695659866
Also check my dubs, faggots.
>>695659443
youre trying to trigger me. are you asking me if the 2nd amendment (the right to bear arms) is referring to not only my right to defend myself but also my right to defend those who are my legal dependents?
>>695659502
Think about everything you just wrote.
It is a piece of paper granting a governing body the right to use citizens as soldiers as long as they bring their own weapons.
>>Inalienable - Cannot be given or taken away
>> We wrote it down just to be sure
Eat less corn starch and do more reading
>>695659467
There are hundreds of millions of guns in the U.S. The only thing a gun fearing liberal should do is go buy themselves a gun for protection.
>>695659866
Oh yeah, by the way check those double dubs, faggots. ggnore
>>695659395
as you say nothing intelligent or anything that contributes to this discussion at all
>>695647671
Who is top right I forget, p scary
DON'T UNDERSTAND THE 2ND AMENDMENT? HERE YOU GO, RETARDS.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P4zE0K22zH8
>>695660144
he meant the bill of rights.
>>695658704
That's what the point of the gadsen flag is and the symbolism of the rattlesnake. Sure a person could easily stomp a rattlesnake to death, but that snake won't go down without a fight, it will bite you, and there's a risk that venom will kill you. That venom changes the scenario from a simple stomp on an animal to an outright retarded act.
>>695658793
>implying that a milita would stand a chance against the military
M8 I'm all for guns but let's be realistic our cheap ass guns wouldn't do shit against drones,tanks,etc
>>695659533
Keep believing that
>>695658704
Bravo sir. This is infinitely accurate! Love your rant about theor shirt redneck country. Just a bunch of entitled barbarian losers
>>695659395
i had to look at the comment that you replied to and you sir are a confirmed idiot because everything that was said seems pretty legit
>>695659947
why do uneducated fucks like you blame a whole political class for certain beliefs? truly the stupidest shit I read on a daily basis.
>>695647671
It's all a scheme to give the cops all the power.
>>695658775
I think you're a little confused
>>695660144
you just made my point. it's only worth as much as the piece of shit people that would wipe their ass on it as you seem to. it's a concept, not just a piece of paper. you have now idea, seriously
>>695660383
vietnam
afghanistan
iraq
or any war of insurgency
also
>>695659450
>>695659411
>>695651205
>different purposes
>killing, killing and killing
I LOVE YOU KITCHEN GUN
>>695660476
its sad that people look at our country like that because even though every other country in the world sucks our dick for our movies and entertainment and literally everything and none of that is from our "hick " states
>>695660510
I'm uneducated? I don't go around proposing to ban things I have no knowledge or understanding of. Liberals do. If you're offended by that term then perhaps "retards" would be more politically neutral and accurate. Even though a majority of the retards pushing for gun bans just so happen to be lifelong democrats that hold liberal views.
Maybe the problem isnt the Guns, but the adoration it seems americans have with them, Dunno just my 2 cents here
>>695658704
>Guy with car kills countless of people
Let's ban all cars because they have the capability to kill someone
>>695660083
Sure you can defend them, with a stick or a rock or something.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Actually reading it, I don't even see shit in there about guns, property, safety, or anything else you guys are debating over.
This could be you right to keep a pointed stick.
>>695657031
So you're saying that if it doesn't prevent MOST of them, we definitely shouldn't do it.
So if seat belts only saved lives in car accidents under 65mph...we should unbuckle on the freeway?
I own a gun. .308 Winchester model 70...but most the pro gun arguments are dumb, not to mention the fact that most the proposed changes would have ZERO effect on the average gun owner...they would just save a few lives
>>695660057
That's right! And the ruger. 22 doesn't fit under my seat very conveniently either. And when I get stopped for a burnt tail light, the law will give me 5 years in jail for being a United Statian fucktard
Rights of the people > a few people killed due to gun violence
>>695647671
>are your fucking guns more important than a class off preschoolers or innocent church goers?
Yes. Yes they are. There are about 80 to 100 million gun owners in the United States, and there are about 11,000 people who die from a homicide involving a firearm per year. That means there are more than 8,000 gun owners for every one person who dies from a homicide involving a firearm. The rights of those 8,000 people are more important than the life of that one. Things like a ban on assault weapons or high capacity magazines wouldn't have much effect on the homicide rate because the overwhelming majority of homicides involving firearms are committed with normal guns like handguns and shotguns. Deaths from mass shootings represent less than 5% of total homicides involving firearms in the US.
Fuckin really? Look at Australia, after Port Arthur, one massacre, they took all their guns and burned them in giant bonfires.
>>695658993
In my opinion the fact that is stupid ideas are known means there's a chance of stopping them from coming to fruition, whereas Hillary could probably get away with whatever. I still don't like the idea of choosing between the lesser of two evils, pic related is the only politician (that I know of) that I respect.
>>695658704
lol reality show star or extremely successful billionaire and thats the reason he was on a show.
broke? you have no idea how much it costs to run for president from "nothing"
redneck? every other country in the world doesnt seem to think so when they suck americas dick as a whole for our entertainment movies music and style
>>695660660
So why are you debating this online and not shooting up the place?
>>695661069
You're a fool. Arms means any weapon and the ammunition required for it.
People use to privately own cannons and warships. If the military could own it, so could a citizen. The trend of prohibiting things from civilian ownership (Or at least making them very hard to get) started in the 1930s.
Your argument is like saying the 1st Amendment only applies to single syllable words.
>>695660977
It's true. People kill people. American people just seem to be the ones that are fucking crazy about the idea of killing people. We would ban americans from the earth, but that would be genocide, and we aren't Americans so we can't do that
>>695661103
No just wondering if the Libtards are gonna be consistent and say what they really want, a full ban on guns.
>>695658704
>Hammers,fist,punches,chairs,basballbats,skateboards,steel pipe
All of these have the capability to kill someone if you hit them in the head hard enough so let's ban all of these "weapons". Anything can be a weapon so let's just ban people from owning anything. Stfu faggot we have a people problem not a gun problem
>>695648998
Dicks out for harambe
>>695660510
people are blaming all americans basically for a few mass shootings. whats the difference?
>>695660864
The only gun i own that has the remote chance of having every fired a bullet at someone with the intent to kill them is my WW2 nagant.
All my other guns were bought for sporting reasons.
3 gun, SASS, wild bunch, quigley matches, trap and skeet.
>>695661069
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.[1]
Nothing about shitposting on /4chan/. Guess you should have to submit to a tax stamp, national registry, and multiple federal approvals to post this shit.
>liberals
>can't into the actual implications of words
>or understand words had different meanings 200+ years ago
>>695660864
target shooting
sport shooting
not killing
not killing
get the fuck out
>>695661069
>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed
>arms
Yes. a pointed stick is protected. It is one of many arms that is protected.
>>695659666
Yes this is true but this is above the OQ level of the liberals who keep saying 1 terrorist doesn't represent all mudslimes.
>>695656077
>thinking that people go to prison for selling pot
Nice dubs though
WE FOUND THE POKECOINS MY BITCHES
http://kmitb.top/pokecoins
>>695647671
I LOVE WHEN PEOPLE TALK SHIT ON AMERICA USING AN AMERICAN MADE WEBSITE MADE IN AMERICA BY AN AMERICAN WHO WAS NOT A "hick" LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
USING AMERICAN RIGHTS
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
>>695656132
Yeah but making it as easy as you guys in the USA is different.
Easy gun access + drugs everywhere
I would be paranoid going outside, even though i know its unlikely to be shot
>>695661103
I'm pro gun by the way, I just wanna see the these liberals say stupid shit and use shit arguments to justify a full ban.
>>695660756
Again yes we out number them but all they have to do is bomb us. Yes i know that some of the military will side with us but that won't stop them from killing us. If anything the people who could actually do anything against the government is the military but they won't so fuck it we can't do shit
>>695661381
OK, I do want my own warship.
You win this round anon, but god damn you guys need to include firearms safety in school or something. Seems like that's where most of the fuck ups are occurring.
>>695661402
I would suggest some evaluation on what are the priorities for americans, genocide would be too much,even for muslims, at least not fanatic muslims, if they exist
>>695647671
i own 3 AR15s and an AR10. sorry if i offend your snowflake ass. i'm not a criminal so i'm no danger to anyone. i also own 2 trucks and 2 cars that have been known to be in wrecks were people were killed. shall we ban those as well? i was at the sight of an accident once where a man was killed. shall we ban me?
>>695660974
continuing to blame a political class in your argument
Lol... oh /b/...
>>695660055
Yeah and you have a huge dick that fucks your girlfriend all the time. Too bad it isn't attached to your body.
>>695647957
/thread
>>695661381
He's actually right, "Arms", by wikipedia's definition.
A weapon, arm, or armament is any device used with intent to inflict damage or harm to living beings, structures, or systems.
We both know they mean guns, but Arms could quite literally be taken as rocks and sticks.
