can jet fuel melt steel beams?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
can jet fuel melt steel beams?
>>687317275
Dank fuel can melt fresh memes though
1
>>687317275
No but it can weaken them. Try harder conspiracyfag
Yes
>>687317275
it can heat it up until it becomes too soft to support such a big structure
>>687317618
That's what they want you to believe.
>>687317275
A plane never hit WTC 7 but it still fell in 7 seconds without jet fuel.
So the real question is, can office supplies burning melt steal beams?
>>687317987
But there was only 2 WTCs, north and south.
You're expecting me to believe there was 7, if not more?
Fucking commies
>>687318186
Troll harder.
>>687318186
Troll harder faggot
>>687318695
>>687318743
Woah. First hive mind, almost.
yes
>>687318695
>>687318743
Where were these other trade centers and why were they not covered on the news? Don't need no tinfoil hat for this one you liberals.
Also, why does everyone disregard the fact that no airplane wreckage was found at both the pentagon and the one that crashed in the field.
>>687317275
no but met juel can felt beam steels.
>>687317536
Um no the industrial steal beams used couldn't be weaken from small amount of jet fuel that ignited for such a small time.
>>687317536
The firemen at the scene said there was molten steel.
No, because the highest possible jet fuel burning temperature is lower, than the minimum required for steel beems to melt + like 90% of the fuel exploded when the planes hit the buildings
>>687319824
As I expected, only two towers.
May I also add world trade centre 7 didn't blow itself up.
>>687317275
No, but thermite can.
Oy vey! It was Saudi Arabia!
>>687317275
But what about the mind control agents used for chemtrails? Who knows how hot those burn?
>>687317536
Jew detected.
The jet fuel burning ignited building materials such as gypsum, these materials burn hot enough to weaken steel
I know its a joke and what not but I can never get over the fact how fucking stupid some people are when they say that it wasn't all planned like I just cant I just......... god it hurts my head to even think about the whole wtc conspiracy like its not even a conspiracy its right there in the footage and the eye witness accounts you don't need an engineer or a fucken rocket scientist to tell you that it was all planned.
>>687320292
Not only what firemen said, its on video, whole world saw molten steel pouring off the buildings..
https://www.you tube.com/watch?v=sw4UDcmOqp4
>>687317829
no thats actual physics
just like your flacid penis gets soft when you realize that you cant bang that hot chick you have been friends with for years now.
In 1992 they created this monolith to reflect the two towers collapse. they called it the millenium hotel with one N for the One world tower.
>>687317536
>>687317618
Yes, because, you know, every building that catches fire just collapses, that is very common..
Oh wait..
>>687322740
another angle
>>687319259
who said that? like, where you there? I wasnt, but I can imagine that the speed and force brutaly smashed every part of that plane into the structure. I cant imagine why people would think that there would be debris outside the building, like the plane would bounce of the building. just like the twin towers, the extreme force pictorally "sucked" the whole plane into the building.
>>687321057
>>687320405
noone ever claimed anything else. between those towers, there was wtc 7, hard to see in this illustration.
>>687317536
>>687317618
>>687318186
>>687322711
In every thread there is one jew on duty who will do this.. First I thought it's pathetic, but now I think it's hilarious..
Take off your tin foil hat and learn something about metal plastic fracture and deformation
>>687323357
are you fucking retarded no matter how fucking fast something is going the speed of the impact isn't going to just make the hundreds of pounds of steel just disappear you fucking idiot do you even know how big a 747 is and did you see the size and angle it hit the building go suck your fucken corrupt govts dick you blind faggot
>>687317275
RIP 4chan
>>687319954
>small amount
>over 23.000 gallons in a single plane
>mfw
>>687323422
what the fuck, are that jew letters?
>>687321638
try harder
>>687324018
google it.
you wont be disappointed.
>>687317987
7 seconds? Sure, if you dont count the internal collapse that caused the penthouse to fall well before the facade...
>>687323957
so in that case the heat at the impact site was equivalent to the heat on the sun
>>687323531
>WTC 7
>Only 2 WTCs
>where the other 5
>>687317275
Jet fuel hides the reaction of thermite and thermate
>>687324133
try harder?
>>687322992
>disregarding the fact that it was hit by a fucking plane and then catched on fire
u wot m8
>>687319259
because its not true. 5 seconds on the interwebs proves your claim utterly false.
>>687317275
>>687317536
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCdRA09pztM
>>687324491
but nothing was found
Empire state building was hit by a B-25 bomber and burned for days...never fell....Only 3 high rises have ever fell due to fire, guess which 3....And building 7 wasn't really on fire
A controlled implosion is very distinguishable and obvious
>>687324732
dude even the engineers that designed the towers said that they were built to take multiple hits and from different angles and not go down.
>>687324693
dont be a fuck stick.
You lie. Google "pentagon plane debris" and see just how wrong you are.
Some pics here. More from both sites if you are actually interested in looking.
http://skepticproject.com/articles/911/pentagon/
>>687317275
Is Facebook Spying On You?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=biGHT89VsYo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AK1nkwL4J3Q
http://www.news4jax.com/news/investigations/i-team-investigation-is-facebook-spying-on-you
http://www.infowars.com/facebook-spies-on-you-for-the-government/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFmRKOnHUfc&feature=youtu.be&list=UUvsye7V9psc-APX6wV1twLg&t=79
>>687317275
http://q13fox.com/2016/05/30/is-facebook-spying-on-you-through-their-microphone-feature/
http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/02/09/385001258/samsungs-privacy-policy-warns-customers-their-smart-tvs-are-listening
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/02/05/your-samsung-smarttv-is-spying-on-you-basically.html
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/10/six-ways-tech-spying-how-turn-off
https://www.samsung.com/uk/info/privacy-SmartTV.html
Oh my god I just realised that jet fuel doesn't need to melt steel beams to cause a hundred thousand tonne building to collapse on itself.
>>687325331
nope no plane debris were found and to further prove your stupidity have you seen how the plane hit how the fuck does a plane even get that low in one of the country's most highly secured buildings?
>>687324732
>wasnt really on fire
>burned for 8hrs
>>687325001
building 7 wasn't even hit. the only time a building falls like that is from a controlled implosion.
>find another video with a building falling like that wasn't a controlled demolition
you cant
>>687325981
see >>687324631
>>687325981
That argument has been lame for years, but WTC-7 can't be explained away. That's the gap in every deniers armor.
>>687326166
it was hit by a collapsing skyscraper from across the street.
Show me another video of a building getting hit by debris from 110 story building.
>>687317275
Yes. 9/11 is proof.
Jewing in this thread is strong.. Stronger then in race war bait thread earlier today..
>>687326117
let me add to that, the jets that were scrambled to intercept the planes took quite some time to get into the air.. that seems very odd last time I recall those things are supposed to be prepped for war and sent into the sky at the blink of an eye.
>>687322384
Underrated post.. Christopher Bollyn figured it all out.. Wanna know the truth, listen to this man talk..
>>687317275
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?p=Is+Facebook+Spying+On+You%3F&ei=UTF-8&hspart=mozilla&hsimp=yhs-002
I like how all those buildings fell into nice, neat little demo piles. They all fell straight down like there was no chaotic destruction. Demolition crews spend weeks prepping to make buildings fall like those three did. But people will believe what they want, I guess.
>>687326995
They were all on exercises posted well away from the response areas. They were alerted, but none were close enough to get there on time. Ironically.
how to make c1
>>687326117
LOL. So....the pictures of debris are...fake?
9/11 was nothing more than a more recent Operation Northwoods ...Google it and prove me wrong
Pro tip: You cant
>>687327255
yea similar exercises happened minutes maybe even seconds before other terrorist attacks around the world like in Spain google it dude it just proves how almost every country was finding a way to get into the war its sad really how we mean so little to the government that we would fight and die for if need be.
>>687327666
satan tripz
>>687327175
>>687325391
>>687325714
government bot
>>687327499
kek. you are just highlighting his point.
>>687327666
Satan knows. Operation Northwoods was the 9/11 plan.
>>687317275
Hey retard jet fuel doesn't need to melt steel is just that constant extreme heat like fire will make it weak it doesn't have the same strength after fire.
>>687328048
this
>>687327499
nice bro what about all the other hundreds of pieces of scrap metal? what you mean to tell me that all that was left was thin sheet of metal haha kek bruv get real
>>687327255
except they didnt- 40 other buildings were damaged by the collapse...the top basically exploded when it dropped initially and sent debris ejecting outward...
another failed meme
https://www.metabunk.org/debunked-wtc-towers-fell-in-their-own-footprints.t1226/
>>687328174
>this again
>>687324631
>>687317618
It hit the top
The bottom of its structure wasn't damaged, it was blown up via controlled demolition.
9/11 was an inside job!
One werd: Thermite
>>687327993
yes, highlighting the fact that a lot of debris were found at the pentagon- Hard to plant an engine LOL
Funny the Pentagon has hundreds of cameras around it, intense security obviously... and not ONE shows a plane hit the building
bush banged a 9/11
The plane that crashed into the field did not yield one body or any plane parts...xplane that one
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzF1KySHmUA
>>687319500
/kek how did this go missed. Checked
Here's the Northwoods document, declassified.
http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/news/20010430/northwoods.pdf
>>687329197
Like I said, if that isn't a 9/11 scenario nothing is
>>687319500
  ▲
â–² â–²
>>687328674
>lot of debris
the invisible kind?
>pic of engine at crash sight?
>>687329126
for the third time >>687324631
>>687327499
all I see is a thumfail
  ▲
â–² â–²
No but it can weaken it enough for Zionism to collapse wtc7
>>687317275
the real question is, why the fuck the the whole building go down?
>>687329086
Pacific Southwest Airlines Flight 1771
Look it up, all that was left of that plane was paper and tiny metal bits .
That's not the only case of an airplane disintegrating Look more into a subject before you advocate for it
>>687329905
Thermite
>>687317275
melt? to liquid? no.
the structure was run through by a massive jet.. wich it now has to support the weight of as well. the fire wouldnt melt anything but the fire would be hot enough to weaken the steal significantly to the point of failure.
>>687329197
Anyone who thinks 9/11 isn't something our government wouldn't conceive of or would never do, just read this fucking operation. Everything about 9/11 is in that operation.
It didn't fall and its old as fuck
>>687330046
fuck my ass
>>687324631
>>687330256
People don't want to believe it...Theyre cattle
>>687329739
Damn
>>687329086
I dare you to google "Shanksville plane debris"
>>687330352
my source: metallurgy
your source: rednecks
>>687317275
no but it can seriously damage them YOU FUCKING CRETIN!!!!!!!111!!!11!!11111!
>>687319954
what about a fucking plane flying directly into them?
>>687330320
so this proves that bombs cant bring down a building?
>>687329453
come kids...are you new to the interweb??
quit trolling and take the 3 seconds to google
"pentagon plane debris"
"shanksville plane debris"
...and then lie again.
>>687325283
sometimes engineers dont know what the fuck they are talking about till its tested.
>>687330944
the planes were remote controlled
>>687330654
>rednecks
eye witness firemen
>metallurgy
paid shills
>>687329197
My favorite part of the plan. I always thought truthers were full of shit about the whole "exchanging planes" theory, until I saw it described in the Northwoods document.
>>687330875
Bomber as in plane not bombs as in boom boom
>>687331086
>shills
confirmed for tinfoil user
steel fails if it gets hot. deal with it.
>>687331037
Was it really true that no one was on the planes. I heard some shit like that from somewhere else
>>687331212
Bingo
>>687323847
just a site for pedos you sick fucks
>>687317275
>>687331368
who knows?
>>687317275
Why is your "f" so thin
>>687324327
fun fact thermite was used to cut beams after the towers collapsed ;eaving residue every where and getting tards like you all excited
>>687331368
see
>>687331212
which is taken from
>>687329197
>>687319500
witnessed
>>687331323
cool story bro, 1945 bomber jet compared to 2001 boeing passenger jet.
To all the conspiracist, what reason would america have to blow up it's own buildings?
>>687328589
which was used after the towers collapsed to clear material.
>>687331775
what a great way to hide the evidence...use it to cut up the debris as well
>>687331368
people make stuff up.
>>687331883
see
>>687329197
Same reason, same result, different country.
>>687330944
>"pentagon plane debris"
>"shanksville plane debris"
>Two different plane crashes
your point?
>>687331346
you are the one calling a 9/11 fireman a liar
>feel good?
>>687317275
Jet fuel can't melt steel beams
Flames that are fuelled with jet fuel can weaken steel beams and let the building collapse because of it's weight.
>>687330959
then why the fuck are they engineers?
>>687331942
so you think the thousands of workers in the building didnt notice professional demolition teams drilling through walls and into the steel support beams of the buildings?
>>687324327
you dont need thermite to take down a building of that size. a fire covering several floors of the building would burn hot enough to make steal holding that building and now the weight of a plane as well to fail
Building 7 had no jet fuel and it fell in free fall...numerous news agencies were there as they were told it was being "pulled" as in demolished
>>687332382
the work could of been done at night and disguised as a remodeling...think outside the box
>>687331881
And what's the big difference between them that makes his argument so silly huh?
You sound like a plane expert, so fill us in on why that's so ridiculous to compare
>>687332170
doing an image search based on those labels will yield irrefutable proof that plane debris was found at both locations despite claims to the contrary.
what molten metal>??
strange first time I seen this one
>>687332931
kek
if said argument that the building collapsed due to its weight above the burning floors wouldn't thee be an initial gradual descent before the whole thing just went into free fall and collapsed in 10 seconds?
>>687332859
this
>>687332241
because they went to school to become one..
all buildings are engineered, yet many fail.. an engineer can predict it will still be standing after an impact of a certain magnitude.. but he didint factor in a raging fire on several floors heating up the steel in the already damaged structure.
>>687332769
>>687332170
>>687330944
The missing plane debris theory is a distraction, there was plenty of plane debris found at all 9/11 sites. Planes were used, just not by who we were all told.
>>687332436
"free fall" is a false claim. The penthouse clearly falls several seconds before the facade indicating internal collapse already begun well before the "free fall" facade.
>>687332760
the size? dumbass
If the upper part collapsed due to the fire the lower part would of toppled off to one side not straight in, in free fall
>>687332769
funny your photo only shows a scrap of small metal.
did the wings enter the building?
>>687333179
controlled implosion..classic example
>>687333168
ok dude even if in the most controlled environment an object of that magnitude should not fall that quickly, seriously how do you explain the speed t which those buildings collapsed?
The Pentagon has one of the most sophisticated surveillance systems available with hundreds of cameras, not one captured an airplane hit the Pentagon
>>687333615
>>687319500
Checked
>>687332605
well as some one that worked nights in trade tower 2 for three years before 9/11 i can promise you there was no such remodel or construction. no construction at all for 3 years out side of window replacement
heating steel beyond 600F causes it to undergo metallurgic changes. permanently weakening the steel. the hotter you go the faster the steel weakens.
>>687333156
>>687333901
looks like a missile to me, too small to be a plane
>>687317275
>>687333901
Was the pilot luke skywalker?
>that was a plane
>>687333845
gravity
the weight of upper floors coming down on the floor below it compiling and each one buckles instantly as its slammed with 10s of floors worth of weight.
>>687332859
Great post.. You can clearly see on that picture how fire from jet fuel "weakened" steel beams, witch caused building to collapse..
/irony off
>>687334220
it only has to weaken 1 floor to cause a chain collapse. your image is irrelevant.
>>687332760
just to give you an idea, faggot.
>>687334189
so many fucking retards post this
the pit is an oven with 5 closed sides not a open air burn
>>687334240
got a pic of the plane right here
>>687333383
And how much bigger is it dumbass?
There's no way that the plane is that much bigger that you can easily distinguish one for killing only 14 people and the other killed almost 3000 in just one plane crash.
>>687334025
lmao.. look at this jew dummy.. no matter how much evidence you show, they will just keep repeating same horseshit over and over, like retarded parrots..
>>687334576
yea b 25 is WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYY smaller and slower than a 747 with less fuel and way less weight
>>687334466
>a hollow tube
>>687320292
at the collapsed debris sure. but the time it took for the buildings to fall the beams could not melt that quickly. all it takes is a weakening of the structure and then the subsequent pancaking of floors on top of each other starting at the top to bring it down. simple physics.
>>687332241
maybe it's the shitty American engineering its known for?
>>687334874
but the bomber had bombs on board
they do much more damage than jet fuel
>>687334934
how ?>
Out of dozens of high rise fires over the years only 3 buildings have ever fallen....guess which 3....how ironic
>>687334774
see
>>687334466
for a size comparison moron, do you have any idea how big a 747 is?
>>687335173
but it started from the bottom though...
says every retard ITT
>>687334827
i could say the same shit to you. doesnt mean shit. understand how metal structures fail or gtfo. its not about jet fuel. its not about melting. its about the failure of steel when its hot and under load.
>>687333644
except for the lack of visible and audible squibs inside and out.
Show me one controlled demolition implosion using explosives that is silent.
>post stale normie memes
wow, sure is SUMMER in here
>>687335281
except you can hear it and see the tiny explosions on various floors
>>687335259
once that top part collapsed on itself and slammed down .. it might have failed further down. completely possible.
>>687335363
>resorting to stale insults because you don't like the thread topic
gtfo newfag
>>687335197
How many were stuck by a jumbo jet going 500 mph immediately before the fire?
>>687335094
prove to me the b25 had bombs... as it was flying from New Bedford, Massachusetts, to LaGuardia Airport because no report ive seen ever mentioned the plane (which only had 3 crew members at the time) and was simple traveling within the states had bombs
>>687334466
That's an F-86 saber fighter not a B-25 bomber you twit...
>>687335510
this is a chain collapse.. the weight coming down causes the floors to buckle one at a time.
>>687331368
Yes, it is really true.
>>687335259
no one said that faggot
it was placed at different parts of the building
>>687335543
plane can't even fly that fast at that altitude
>>687335389
>>687335525
i'm not saying it isn't impossible but merely stating what a lot of retards tend to spew out when the evidence is literally staring them in the face
>>687333615
there are a lot more pics- why havent you looked for yourself instead of guessing for 15yrs??
http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtml
>>687335266
but there is only one truth.. and at the end it will get out on the surface..
>>687334466
Yes so its like what only ten times bigger?
Yet it still kills 200 times more people and collapsed a much bigger building.
>>687335510
those tiny explosions are just windows blowing out lol they dont share any similarities with actual explosions
>>687335733
alot of you conspiracy nuts say EXACTLY that, faggot. and how would you know anything about where these supposed explosives were placed? because you saw a simple blow out from certain windows along the side of the building? tryharder, faggot
>>687335865
yea 10 times bigger is a fuck ton more mass
>>687335865
fuck you're retard as fuck dude.. look at the mass moron
Same ending different story...perfect cover up
>>687334937
>>a hollow tube
fully loaded wings with liquid fuel, 3 ton engines...traveling at 500mph...some hollow tube.
>>687336120
>same ending
>US president was shot
>building falls
just stop
>>687335585
theyre all about the same size fag, calm down
>>687335642
ok all points considered how do you explain the perfectly cut steel beams cut at a an angle most commonly seen in building demolition and the molten steel that burnt for weeks in the basement
>>687317275
allow me to retort
>>687336288
hardly
>>687335865
also, if you check the date the empire state building was hit, it was a saturday - perhaps more people could have died but just weren't there
>>687335197
how many of those other fires involving ramming fully loaded jet planes into the buildings at 500mph first?
...or in the case of WTC7- had a 110 story building fall on it first?
>>687336290
they were cut after the collapse during rescue efforts you tard
>>687335866
then why were there smoke clouds coming out of them aswell and mind you these explosions were several stories below the impact site
>>687336563
Oh I thought they used thermite?
>>687336563
no they were not
>>687335510
No. The collapse of WTC7 sounded NOTHING like a controlled demo. Nothing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaBQ3AkRetI
>>687336365
better faggot?
>>687336685
both the larger beams cut with thermite
>>687336042
Well yes its more mass, but is it enough mass is the question. A bomber kills only 14 people and makes a 18 foot hole , but but a plane causes a building to be completely destroyed? Idk if the difference is really that significant
>>687336903
you mad brah?
>>687336563
no you tard there are beams that were standing several feet above the ground that were cut you dumb cunt
>>687336970
yes seeing as the b25 hit the building before it was open for business at half the speed while
>>687336708
why would mosad need so many detonators in the world trade center 2 weeks before they fell?>>687336708
>>687337233
>>687336649
because the fucking building was on fire and had been burning for hours...when shit collapses it pushes air out first...where do you think the smoke would go?
>>687336875
that one was actually cut by the fire fighters tho so yea
>>687337391
>>687337105
yes because cherry pickers dont exsist... god i wish i took pictures when i was there. i could see the guys cutting the beams from my office building
>>687336111
Lol so salty you can't even grammar. I didn't think summerfags are this easy
>perfectly cut steel beams cut at a an angle most commonly seen in building demolition
the ends of beams ends arent changed by either type of destruction.. its near the point they are welded together at that fails in collapse.
there was tons of debris creating an oven-like environment that held in heat.
i didnt see any images of molten steel but if the debris burned uncontrolled for that long i wouldn't be surprised.
>>687336875
they break at the edge of the weld you fucktard
>>687324631
steel melts from thermite bombs kiddo
>>687336875
i love how you faggots see pics like this with no firsthand experience or actual facts of the situation regarding timing and disassembly of the wreckage and ASSUME it must have been cut before the building fell. where's your evidence?
>>687337526
>>687337392
then why was there molten fucking steel burning for weeks in the basement after the fucking collapse I don't think that the flames we're that hot if they were then we'd have people walking by and losing a piece of their skin everytime the walked by
>>687337624
how long have you been here? thats an intentional error moron.
As an engineer, adding heat energy to steel will alter its physical properties. Jet fuel cant melt steel but it will heat it up so it weakens it. Since the beams are in compression it will cause buckling and then ultimately the building will collapse.
>>687337883
>>687333984
Read that Einstein
>hmmmm
actual beam melted by jet fuel your argument is invalid
>>687337894
>>687337544
yes the fire men cut a lot of the beams but there were lot of beams several feet off the ground that were cut in the exact same manner now I could be mistaken but maybe they levitated up there and cut them down piece by piece
>>687317275
Can my jizz impregnate your girlfriend ?
>>687337894
you can stand directly next to a forge and not loose a piece of your skin
people on the street several floors above the basement were fine.
>>687317275
I have a webm of jet fuel melting steel beams, but I'm not going to look for it. Just youtube it.
>>687338334
no they used the fucking ladders on their trucks
do you think ladders dont exsist?
>>687338301
funny there is no blackening on that from fire
that was bent due to the fall..FAIL
>>687338572
inb4 jewtube
>>687338301
melted is a bad word. people think molten steel when you say melted.. it was softened to the point of failure.
I'm BAFFLED how everyone is saying that 747 this and jumbo jet that.
What the fuck up, it wasn't 747's that crashed into the towers, it were 777's which are MUCH less bulky in comparison, has 2 engines less and carries less jet fuel.
>>687337883
>>687338248
dude the installed new security 'routers' 8 on every floor right at structural points
the weekly bomb sniffing dogs were not allowed in the buildings for the 2 weeks prior to the WTC demolition
>>687338543
ok a bit of sarcasm on my part sorry I forgot we're not on 4chan you cuck care to explain why there was pools of steel for weeks after tho?
>>687331444
wow checked
>>687317275
No, but it can most definitely make the structure heat up enough to colapse under it's own weight
>>687338629
no blackening? maybe because most of the soot was cleaned off so i could be inspected look at the bottom right of the picture to see some they couldn't get off
>>687338959
>wow
kys
>>687338842
Boeing 767
The hijackers flew the plane into the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City at 8:46 a.m. United Airlines Flight 175: a Boeing 767 aircraft, departed Logan Airport at 8:14 a.m. en route to Los Angeles with a crew of nine and 51 passengers, not including five hijackers.
Google, faggot
>>687338620
wow I know that engine ladders are long as fuck but damn they extended them that high and that far without needing support from the ground haha kek
Thermounclear bomb
One bright side to the story
It happened in NY land of shitheads and asswipes
>>687317275
>can jet fuel melt steel beams
no but there is an important part people keep missing.... fires get.... wait for it.... hotter when you add fuel.
think about what was burning in there. phones, computers, etc. all plastic. how many wooden desks? stacks of paper? printer ink? toner? cleaning supplies? Styrofoam ceiling? rubber? carpet and clothing, pencils and microwaves, drywall and plaster, insulation......
i could go on for 50 posts about all the stuff that caught on fire. that adds up to one MASSIVE fucking inferno.
>and still, never before has a fire brought down a steel core building
>and then there's that tower built by nips that took hits from 12 tomahawk missiles and is still around today
>>687338317
clearly the jetfuel had long since burned up.
but a debris fire the size of that building burning in a pit for a week would melt metal.
>>687339082
Well the 767 is even smaller ya bellend so thanks for making my point mate!
