ITT: Political compass test results
politicalcompass(dot)org
>>686362805
my fucking man
>>686363090
>>686362954
Damn straight, if you aren't purple you need to get the fuck out
>>686362805
>>686363090
>>686363181
Gandhi liberal and proud.
roast me, fags
Not a faggot
>>686363376
/pol/ plz go.
rate/roast me
>>686364469
no you. and /pol/ is great
>>686362805
>>686363090
>>686364654
Businesses and lords cant be evil, mkay?
>>686363290
Gandhi was racist and Gay
Almost perfect neutral. With a dash of right wingedness. About what I expected.
Come at me
>>686364867
What a completely fucking retarded comment.
Businesses have to obey the law so they can't violate anyone's rights. The worst they can do is do a shitty job serving customers and go out of business.
When government is shit it stays in business. And they exist to violate your rights
>>686364685
kill youself
>>686365401
impressive
>>686365957
Wew
Come fucking at me
>>686365965
>>686365957
/thread.
green quadrants cant understand an-cap philosophy, the poor fucks have been indoctrinated "business bad, government good".
>>686365957
>Businesses have to obey the law
Top fucking kek. Tell that to the people in india that Nestle is denying water to, saying either buy it or go fuck themselves. Say that to the fucking CEO that thinks water shouldn't be a basic commodity
>>686362805
And now most of /b/ will hate me even if they have no idea who I am.
>>686366495
Nope. Businesses are bad, and so is the government because they let them influence so much.
>>686366718
bahahahaha.
nice job explaining why corporatism is bad, next?
Imma liberal
>>686366896
Bro, see >>686366520
Now shut the fuck up and take a seat
>>686366933
Barely you fucking faggot
cry more
You cannot be on the libertarian right. That would assume that the conservatism held some libertarian ideals.
In fact this whole chart is unnecessary once you see the paradoxes. You have what is called a deductive paradox: you have deduction, which works because big things can't fit inside small things, and deductive paradox, where the big thing is equivocated into the small thing: Intolerance against intolerance, Freedom to enslave, or forcing someone to be free.
Libertarians believe in personal freedom above all else. To insure this is maintained, they believe in a magical marketplace where the market punishes wrongdoers simply by having people act in their own interest. This selfish marketplace insures people will treat each other with respect, because to not do so would hurt yourself.
This is a narrative that in no way fits the world. It is a magical wish, not a narrative that is useful to believe.
But more importantly, Libertarianism is a narrative that in no way fits conservatism, whose practitioners believe in the structure and respect of hierarchy.
Libertarianism is just delusional liberalism, and authoritarianism is just broken conservatism.
This whole chart is a piece of nonsense. This website's only purpose is to steal information from your computer.
>>686366520
I mean, by that logic, food should be free as it is a necessity. So should be a shelter. Why stop at a shelter? We deserve a life partner, why don't we get one provided by the state?
let's yell at each other over how wrong we are rather than engage in meaningful conversation
>>686366896
>>686367056
By American Standards he's a Marxist. Then again anything that's slightly left is seen as such
>>686367182
There is a difference between giving people tap water as a government and telling them to pay for it and outright selling overpriced bottles of water to people in fucking need of a clean water supply while profiting off it, are you really this fucking stupid?
>>686367182
Nice slippery slope you got there.
>>686366520
There is literally nothing wrong with paying for water.
It's a scarce good; having to pay for it will make people ration it better.
>>686366718
>businesses are bad
How are they bad? Voluntary exchange is bad? Production is bad?
They're only bad in so far as they engage in corporatism. If all they're doing is exchanging goods they can't violate anyone and can only really increase utility.
>>686365401
>>686364654
>>686362954
>>686362805
kill yourself fucking liberals
>>686367172
this guy doesnt understand how political compass works.. left-right on political compass has nothing to do with conservatism-liberalism, its, socialism-capitalism.
one can be socially permissive and capitalistic (libertarian right).. you might wanna read up on ths site.
Come at me /b/ros
>>686367940
bahahaha
not a liberal, im an anarcho-capitalist, and liberals hate me as much as conservatives do.
Fite me /b/
>>686366415
Then the bartender spends life in prison and goes out of business due to no one wanting to partake in his services. Once other bartenders see this, it never happens again.
Regulations are fucking stupid.
>>686367056
>cry more
Nah, I'm not one of those pussy liberals. I am actually able to debate with people.
>>686367885
Explouting people for profut for a good cobsidered vital to life is evil. Water isnt that scarce either.
>>686367916
Christ I'm pretty damn left liberal but holy shit
>>686366450
Hey look, a faggot is calling upon his fellow faggots.
>>686367776
No, if your logic is 'things' should be free then you need to do better than that.
>>686367573
'overpriced'
Meaningless phrase tbh.
The price will equal the amount of resources used to produce and transport the water.
>>686367916
>>686362805
lol i don't know dick about economics
>>686367885
Except it's not a scarce good. Well, it is, because many businesses are poisoning it by dumping their shit into our water supplies, or even creeks and streams just so they can get rid of it cheaper.
And I never said that paying for water is wrong, it's taking the water source of a small portion of the population, shutting tap water off, then proceeding to extort the same portion of the population to buy your water for more money than it costed in the first place, therefore driving them into poverty
>>686367573
I'm just pointing out everything has a price. And that government not providing food is the same as government not providing water.
Also, I couldnt care less about Inda, look at how they treat their water.
>>686368224
I am not even the most Left that I've seen. I've seen a solid -10,-10
>>686368163
Good luck trying to get a lefty to wrap their brain around that one.
>>686366450
Bernie Bros unite!!!
>>686368139
>>686367916
idk if i can even get this on purpose
>>686364485
you're about in the right spot
>>686368199
How is it evil because it's done for a profit?
Everyone benefits. The profit is the reward for helping someone.
Just look at how societies who stopped rewarding people with profit did. Not very well.
>>686367952
Or you don't understand it.
How can you have authoritarian capitalism or libertarian socialism? By your definition (which is wrong) it still doesn't work for anything.
>>686367573
If a country is in peril because one company won't give them water for free, that's the fucking country's fault.
Nestle doesn't have to give shit away just because they're doing business in a shithole.
>>686368296
i am both confused and horny
>>686368475
LOL.
The people they took the water supply from are pretty much sick, dehydrated and everything because they can't fucking pay for it, you moron
I'm surprised, I thought there would be a lot more conservatives here.
>>686368261
>be me
> own water source
>sell water as a good
>use money to buy up more water because why not
>increase price of water
>Buy all remaining water
>Charge everyone a fortune for water because no regulations
>just the market at work
>people die because they cant afford my shit
>damn it feels good to be a nigger
>>686366495
that's red, faggot.
>>686368163
Regulations are an integral part of maintaining the health of an economy. The Fair Labor Standards Act, automotive regulation, and building codes all saved lives by forcing businesses to act more responsibly.
>>686367180
Communist master race reporting in
>>686368583
And we are back to my original point, businesses are bad for governments when governments let businesses influence them this much. Jesus fucking christ, it's like talking to a bunch of apes in this bitch
Only come on this website to laugh at the 15 year old sexually frustrated white kids.
>>686368488
you are also suggesting there is a perfect system to map the complexity of ideology, which cannot exist.
political compass has its issues too, the questions are biased to push the taker into the green quadrant.
>>686368339
Well the CEO was right.
our case is only about property rights being given to a business instead of the local people.
If the local people used the river first they should own it and a business shouldn't be able to come along and just do whatever. No one's saying that's a good thing.
>>686368680
Point out even one time in history that anything like this has happened.
>>686368412
I'm liberal.
Fuck Sanders. His policies are untenable. Stop ruining the evidence-based policy making of progressives by buying into his populist wet dream.
>>686367940
I don't consider myself liberal
For reference dudes
>>686368748
who forces the government to act responsibly?
these agencies are full of unelected people that have no experience in the real world and just make up shit for the sake of exercising power without consequence.
>>686368680
>Implying niggers are that competent
>>686368878
India. Right now. Check out Nestle ;)
>>686368878
Youve never heard of a monopoly or trust?
>>686368680
That really won't happen
Why I sell you my water so you can sell it back to me at a higher price?
Also diseconomies of scale, competition
>>686369037
>who forces the government to act responsibly?
The people who elect officials
>these agencies are full of unelected people that have no experience in the real world and just make up shit for the sake of exercising power without consequence.
Except for the regulations I pointed out.
>>686369162
Fuck me lol, it's happening right now. Jesus
>>686368878
that happens then governments don't exist or give no fuck at all. there have to be regulations.
>>686369026
this is 60% shit
>>686369117
Not much real world evidence of monopolies without government
>>686369048
Nobody would want to sell their river to Nestle. It seems to me it's being done by government.
And Nestle don't own all the water in the world either
I'm a far right
>>686369117
The only true monopolies I've heard of have been through government, not from the market.
>>686369388
>Not much real world evidence of monopolies without government
Even I, as a liberal, will admit that monopolies rarely emerge organically. They are a function of cronyism.
>>686368811
No. You are suggesting there is a perfect system in which all sides can be viewed, just like there is one point in space where you can see everything that is going on, but that is a bias of your Platonic world view - that there are ideal forms somewhere in a metaphysical place that make the world work.
Well, there isn't. Dichotomy cannot divide the world, nor can stepping outside the world by creating a metaphysics see the world.
The world is; You make a story about it - The Narrative. The Narrative filters and adds to make a consistent story of your intent.
But the story isn't the world.
What we are talking about here is the collective action of humans, and the social and physical Narratives we make up to corroborate and coordinate our actions. (cont)
>>686369388
And your point is? It's not like Nestle is actively doing ANYTHING about it or even thinks it's socially unacceptable or morally wrong
>>686369026
total bs. who made this waste?
huh.
>>686369240
>implying elected officials actually give a fuck when its not time for re-election.
ITT: A bunch of guys argue their stances to no audience. Meanwhile, we're all still working until we die.
r8 or h8 me /b/
>>686367916
My man
>>686369533
so much this.
>>686369420
"Far" Fight, you are more Left than Hillary on this scale.
>>686369715
>implying businesses give a fuck about safety when profit isn't involved.
>>686369534
did you read what i typed? i said there isnt one.
tl;dr
I was expecting something on the right, I defintley don't consider myself a liberal and I'm voting for Trump.
>>686369868
profit is motive in its own.
you fuck up, word gets out, you lose profit, and you lose your business... thats how the world works.
>>686362805
Non-left bigot reporting in
>>686368909
fucking shill
>>686369868
The vast majority of businessmen do care.
Even if they don't competition forces them to care.
Just sayin
I'm quite surprised. Was kind of expecting a /pol/ thread
>>686369857
That's bullshit. According to that scale, I'm as stupid as Bernie.
I most certainly am not. I want most regulation to be eliminated, because it serves to entrench the positions of large corporations and snuff out small business.
#sensibleregulation
#sensibleliberalism
>>686370076
>Voting on the wrong fucking person according to your results
>>686370076
that's because you don't know what liberal means.
Fucking fascists
>>686369692
scroll down a little further you fucking idiot
>>686369803
what's the first one?
>>686369534
Over the years we have come up with many Narratives of this collective action.
But the majority of narratives are not told to inform: they are told to manipulate.
The narratives of Socialism, and Capitalism, and Libertarianism, And Buddhism, and Confucianism are all just Narratives.
And they all are hobbled by the Narrative Process that created them.
But the one thing that they all have in common is that they are just stories. Whether those stories are consistent with the other stories of the world is important, but most important is whether those Narrative reflect the world.
Narratives come from the world. Without the narrative intent, the world is indistinguishable from the narrative of randomness.
The intent of this Political Compass is impossible to divine.
The only narrative that has an intent that is reflected by the world is the narrative where this website is just trying to pull you in for your information.
The rest is nonsense.
P.S. as an appeal to authority fallacy, no Poly Sci scholar would find anything interesting in these charts. A psychologist might though...
(0, 0) legalise it
>>686370189
You haven't been keep up with /b/ lately.
You should have been expecting green square newfag cringe
>>686370124
>>686370171
Except the real world doesn't work that way. Businessmen didn't stop hiring children, build safer buildings, and add seatbelts to cars because of consumer outrage. They did so because of steep fines associated with violating state and federal regulations.
Neoclassical economics is chock full of utopian assumptions about how competition affects the quality of services and goods.
>>686370348
Anarcho-fascism is fine tbh
>>686370417
Just did the first one
POLITICAL PHILOSOPHY--determine your philosophy
>>686367916
My original
>>686370796
>Anarcho-fascism
>>686366691
Nope you are a perfectly nice guy.
And not a retard
So I guess according to that website I'm close to Gandhi's views... O-o
>>686370348
Fucking An-Caps.
>>686370171
>>686370124
This is not gownthe world works, there is no profit in shit like safety, paying your workers a fair wage or other measures to minimize human suffering. Five niggers breaking their backs to earn their daily bread will mine a LOT more coal than 2 modern workers with safety gear, precautions and fair working conditions
>>686370725
or maybe information is more avaiable nowadays so people can vote better with their money.
if you have an aware populous, they can punish businesses on their own by not giving them their money.
the world is alot different than it used to be... of course we gotta use old outdated examples to bolster our opinion tho, huh?
>>686370174
Closest one to our lord and savior Trump I've seen in this entire thread
>>686367916
Awesome
>>686371231
ahh, but there is... see how long you last without said measure and people know about it via lawsuits from injuries.
you dont have to bash businesses with laws for them to get the picture.
>>686371249
Yeah, all that information has really stopped unregulated business in China from hiring children to build all of our iPods and Macs. Thank god consumers give a fuck about how their products are made, otherwise governments would be morally compelled to regulate the actions of businesses.
>>686371249
Except nobody is aware. Everybody is looking at news which is owned by corporations, getting their info from fb, which is owned by a corporation, and get their food and commodities from a corporation, and the one thing these corporation have in common is their insatiable greed. Open your eyes for a moment and climb out of the matrix pls
>>686371249
People aren't aware, you fucking cuck. That's why we need government regulation.
>>686369317
Great!
>>686371194
I used to be very Gandhi like, then I slid further to the left, and more Libertarian.
>>686362805
>mfw gulag
>>686371778
Thank you! Jesus fucking christ, these people are retarded, amirite?
>>686371649
i climbed out of the matrix long ago.. the media is one long tangled mess of money interests, and if its not, its an extension of the government, and no one is going to bite the hand that feeds them... the established media is not the only source of information nowadays, we have the internet.
>>686371542
Whoa whoa lawsuits over injuries? That requires safety laws and therefore government regulation
>>686371874
Enjoy your icey demise, anon. I hear Serbia is not nice this time of year... or ever.
>>686371949
Hahahahahaha do you really think corporations aren't up in this bitch either?
>climbed out of the matrix long ago
Have fun being stuck there for eternity
Your Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.36
nvermind its the laws illegal so doesntmater
Do I win?
Same as a lot of others apparently
>>686371778
people arent aware because the government has created a nanny state situation, no one is curious, and everyone is asleep, just like the government likes it.. makes it easier for them to erode your freedoms.
>>686371968
>>686369420
So... you are "that" kind of guy.
>>686370132
Same here
>>686372071
did you not read what i wrote?
>>686371949
government hold no control these days
blackflag.anarchism
>>686371968
LUL REKT
Say what you will...
>>686371231
>>686370725
You can't debunk common sense logic of competition by calling it utopian.
If a place is less safe people will be less willing to work there and businesses will need to pay a lot more to attract workers.
Therefore it's in a company's interest to improve safety and conditions to the extent that the improvements cost less than their value to the worker.
As far as I'm where this is all borne out by history, and safety was improving long before government stepped in
>>686364485
Master race
>>686372134
People aren't aware because consumers are naturally inclined towards choosing the easiest option, which is to not give a fuck about the morality of businesses and take their cool gadgets.
>>686372345
As far as I'm aware
>>686372206
Yeah I did, I just feel like "We have the internet" is an invalid thing to say because
>use google
>get ads and search results based on interests and internet habits
>still influenced
But sure, I don't understand what YOU wrote.
Fuck, I'm tired of people like you
>>686372345
if theres more supply then demand of labor they wont change a thing
no competition
>>686372134
que bono
>>686372473
ya.. i figured you wouldnt get it, go back to sleep.
or get an adblocker, dumbass.
...
look what its reduced to
its ego hahaha socialist government my lawdy
>>686362805
I expected to be in the purple, honestly.
So close to center
>>686367206
just checking in to let you fucks know that if you're in the purple, you're a fucking retard
free market capitalist shits
>>686372835
>>686372345
>Therefore it's in a company's interest to improve safety and conditions to the extent that the improvements cost less than their value to the worker.
No, it's in their interest to find the cheapest way to continue operating. That could mean covering up accidents, paying off complainants, etc. That doesn't necessarily mean improving safety.
>>686372778
>Implying adblocker prevents google/fb/any site that uses cookies from doing that shit to you
>>686372345
No, it's the company's interest to keep things cheap. Everything has an opportunity cost. Money spent on making buildings safer in order to prevent a small minority of workers from leaving could more profitably be spent on expanding business operations.
Hence, why building collapses in places like India and Nepal are far more common than in America. The average cuck has neither the inclination nor experience to understand what constitutes a safely designed building. They want to go to work, even if that entails some risk.
>>686372530
What the fuck
There is literally always going to be competition for your labour. So long as you're worth ten cents an hour someone. will pay you nine cent an hour. Someone else might pay you nine and half. Always competition.
EVEN IF THERE WASN'T they would still have to pay you enough to make you work instead of being unemployed. So they would do safety improvements to reduce the burden of wages.
>>686372778
Lmao, you're really clueless
>>686372345
Safety improved when the population heard about the terrible working conditions presented by deregulated employers, who had long since run any competition out of town. The meat factories of Chicago, child coal miners and textile workers, tge list goes on. Could the public themselves 'vote with their money?' No, because their was literally no other competition and doing so is denying yourself of basic goods like food and clotges to name a few.
So they raised enough of a shitstorm with their GOVERNMENT, the only force in the land with the power to stomp out bad business, to enact worker safety and anti- child labor laws, with steep fines or worse for not obeying them. Busines does not give two shits about safety and decency, or rather those who do get out-competed by those who dont.
>>686363376
Don't worry, I'm right there with ya
>>686362805
is that gud?
How did I do?
>>686373141
wait you mean they are going to invest in a multi billion dollar processing plant because they can save 1c an hour on my labour?!?! ooodaloli
fucking. retard.
>>686372345
That sounds great in theory, but businesses don't actually operate in the manner you're describing. If they did, rich companies exporting manufacturing to places like India and Nepal would have safer, more hospitable factories.
They don't.
>>686373074
>>686373088
Yeah there might be things governments / unions/external organisations can do to help solve knowledge problems like this.
But top down commands are almost always an unnecessary step too far, and government regulators vulnerable to corruption. Companies are best left to handle it themselves
>>686362805
does this mean im gay
Super close to the middle
Any libertarians here?
>>686373728
smoke herb
So, what does this mean? What am i? Social democrat?
>inb4 a fag
>>686373728
yes
>>686373798
shitty word for saying your a library economist
Come at me fags
>>686373891
just got a 2 gram couple hours ago
>>686373937
a faggot who can't post pics
>>686373671
No they're not. If they were, then the terrible conditions in the developing world would have already resolved itself.
I agree government regulators are vulnerable to corruption, but that's problem which is easily solvable by internal watchdogs. Germany and Nordic states seem to have somewhat sensible regulation that does not create unfair competition. The cannot be said about America, where money plays a more important role in political insitutions.
So, what does this mean? What am i? A social democrat?
>inb4 a fag
>>686364485
same shit as me
>>686373671
If anything, Unions should prove your point. Companies fuck up and then workers go on strike.
>>686373417
I don't think it's that simple tbh
>>686373652
There's nothing in the theory that says all factories will end up being safe.
Some people probably prefer to work in a dangerous environment and make a higher wage.
I feel like I should be more towards libertarian
Oh well
>>686373990
Got me there, here's the pic.
>>686374202
Right wing niggers
>>686374376
muh nigga
>>686374249
>>686373671
Im getting cancer from arguing against this, what is so difficult to understand in the lack of profit in being a safe and decent employer?
>>686374249
>Some people probably prefer to work in a dangerous environment and make a higher wage.
Businesses oftentimes do not compensate their employees for working in unsafe conditions. Once again, look no further than the unregulated developing world. Workers toil in terrible conditions only to find themselves comparatively underpaid compared to factory workers in the developed world.
>>686373966
not really that shitty but ill take it
my opinions are the best opinions.
Also most of those questions I did not answer too strongly in one way or the other, because most of the questions are jew-double-talk, where most of the questions are both right and wrong for specific reasons, and they expect you to make a definitive assertion, when doing so is usually incorrect.
>>686374587
>compared to factory workers in the developed world.
Everything sucks in those shitholes... what a crappy argument
>>686374551
If X is dangerous people will be less willing to do it. It will cost more to convince someone to do it.
All you're proving is your autism.
Read >>686372345 again.
>>686374587
That has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Wages are always lower in developing countries because there is less demand for these workers' labour owing to less capital, skills and infrastructure.
Exactly where I thought I would be. Wish the answers allowed a little more flexibility to them though.
>>686375091
No shit. My point is some of that crappiness is due to the government's inability or unwillingness to regulate private activities.
>>686374913
That's what I thought too. White test is better >>686364654. It also makes the mistake of assuming people with conservative values are authoritarian and people with degenerate values are libertarian.
>>686375091
Once again, 5 niggers in a deregulated country mining coal, picking cotton or whatever can and always will produce more cotton than 5 workers in a regulated country who have fair working hours, safety protections and all. Without regulation the rat willing to do evil will outcompete the good rats.
I'd say this is fairly accurate.
I'd consider myself a moderate Liberal Democrat.
Clinton 2016
>>686375467
They can't raise wages except by raising productivity. Regulations would improve safety but lower wages and cause unemployment.
The only efficient way to improve safety is through competition
Left leaning hype
>>686375227
>That has nothing to do with the argument at hand. Wages are always lower in developing countries because there is less demand for these workers' labour owing to less capital, skills and infrastructure.
Is there any evidence of a company that makes unsafe factories paying their workers more than a company that makes safe factories?
>>686375091
the places where it sucks the hardest usually pulling the massive profit
>>686375467
>its shit big brother doesnt encroach and disrespect my privacy
AHAHAHAHHA
fucking retarded cunt woooow
and they dont! how autistic are you? its one big sham and a lie
>>686375786
Kill yourself, faggot.
lotta cucks in the b
>>686376116
Pls
>>686375606
Some niggers will choose to work in the unsafe place some in the safe place. The safe place won't have to pay niggers as much.
hella
>>686375227
If X is dangerous but the choice is to do X or syarve yourself and/or your family, you best believe people will dot hat job anyway for aages far below a fair one
>>686375778
>Efficient
It's a lot more efficient to whip 5 niggers into picking your cotton for you than hiring a few different niggers, paying them a fair and livable wage and doing your part to make sure they dont duffer more tuan needed.
You cant run the entire fucking world on cold LOGIC, this lack of emotional intwlligence is troubling.
.
This AnCap delusion is surreal.
>>686375778
This is not true. It's a myth widely touted by libertarians to justify their hatred of regulatory mechanisms.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/does-government-regulation-really-kill-jobs-economists-say-overall-effect-minimal/2011/10/19/gIQALRF5IN_story.html
Requiring companies to construct safer buildings in the developing world would not drive companies back into the developed world because the former is still much cheaper than the ladder. Additionally, wage depression could be offset with a relatively low minimum wage.
>>686375245
>national socialism
>economic right
ahahahhAHAHAHHAHAHA
dear god
>>686376398
*suffer more than needed
>>686369026
>progressivism is right wing
Are you a literal retard?
>>686375815
Idk probably. There are lots of variables to be accounted for.
The unsafe sweatshops definitely pay a lot more than the countryside and surrounding businesses, but they might also want workers who are skilled.
>>686372950
What does this make me /b/?
>>686376771
>>686376134
Someone who's stolen my political views
I consider myself a National Socialist if that helps you
>>686369026
>>686376470
Anything that increases the cost of a worker reduces demand for that worker. That's not a myth, it's a law of economics.
If the cost doesn't rise much then wages won't fall much. But if the change doesn't cost much and improves conditions companies would do it anyway.
>>686376581
>Idk probably. There are lots of variables to be accounted for.
I feel you on this one, politically opposite /b/rother. Used to do a bit of econ research before I joined teh Army. Wew lad, that's some tough stuff. Poor variable control accounts for 30% of economic illiteracy in America. The other 70% comes from journalists reading a study whose conclusions are lukewarm at best and screaming "OMG LOOK AT THESE FACTS SUPPORTED BY SCIENCE!"
>The unsafe sweatshops definitely pay a lot more than the countryside and surrounding businesses, but they might also want workers who are skilled.
Too lazy to google. Link?
>>686377057
The data shows regulation exerts minimal pressure on employment.
>>686376134
>submits to authority on principle
>calls others cucks while bent over the barrel himself
>>686377305
I imagine it depends how much regulation.
there are more leftists in this thread than I thought there would be.
>>686377043
>I consider myself a National Socialist
how havent you been rounded up hunted and dead
>>686377043
Woag nice, I'd say Paternal Autocraft, Natsoc is a bit much
>>686377651
welcome to the new /b/
>>686377468
Precisely. Which is why I am not a fan of American regulation. It's fucking stupid. 90% of it is retarded.
Please understand, I am not a raging gender studies cuck. I want simple, effective regulation. None of this bullshit on lightbulbs and vaping devices.
huh, kinda interesting.
I don't even know how someone can be authoritarian and be an adult at the same time.
>>686377741
Because the type of people who'd even consider such a thing are immobilized by their obesity
I guess I'm Gandhi, I don't get this shit though. Shouldn't some of the social issues like sex and religion not have party lines? I mean yea they're associated with certain parties but technically they shouldn't factor into anything.
>>686378122
Sex and religion shouldn't, yes. But they do.
Politics is intrinsically retarded, learn to accept it.
>>686378122
Really they confuse liberal values with libertarianism way too much.
The new left is authoritarian but it doesn't show up in this test
>>686362805
Libertarian reporting for duty
>>686378431
>not sucking the politician's cock or letting the corporate executive plow your wife is being underaged
>>686378629
impressive; very nice
>>686378644
your butthurt is also impressive
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcUZrDX5P7A
Where my indecisive niggers at
>>686379483
Pretty close.
I'm Gandhi apparently
