Still on a poke-kick, so I'll be posting box content mostly.
You are in no place to be calling me a retard when you can't even construct basic sentences, you god damn babbling dumbass.
for the next thread can you specify no herm just to totally fuck his argument
everyone here is retarded
its a text conversation just read it again....
He's a brain damaged troll it won't stop him just ignore him and let him waste the rest of his lonely pointless evining.
He probably lives with his mom and gets welfare checks.
I didn't say anything regarding humans or pubic hair
thats probably true but it'll be satisfying
No most of us have jobs and things to do during the day, you don't.
If you can justify spending longer than an hour on 4chan a day you have a problem. Like fuck me I have to go an a couple minutes because I have shit to do tomorrow.
In the real world
That thing you faild at.
Makeing fun of disabled people isnt fun, no sport in it.
>you are this, this, this, and this
Sticks and stones may break my bones, but dat boi is always with me.
Ok mr disabled hand fetishist
Get your government check yet?
I'am clearly far sicker in the head than you...thats good
>XDDDD I GOT HIM THIS TIME
This is acceptable to bigots, right?
You're a fag forcing yourself on a straight thread.
He never knocked her up?
Boy you sure are mad
Widdal disabled babby is upset.
I would say tomorrow will be better but you don't have a job or classes to go to, must suck sitting in your house all day, no social life no education no job.
What kind of a man are you?
He's broken we can let him stew now.
He's a disabled welfare queen hand fetishist troll. Let him post herm it's probably the only joy he has in his life.
I feel like there is a significant amount of context i am missing here
They are peesed at my contributions
A troll being a troll and retards falling for the troll but now the troll has been beaten into submission so he's quite posting herm without typing. Just normal s/fur.
your contributions are like prolonged wet fart at a dinner
I would say "why would we make shit posting threads?" But fluffy abuse threads exists so I can't use that as an argument.
But yes it's just fetish porn.
I'm thinking it's done. I tried to have an actual discussion with them but they didn't do anything besides insult me and call me gay, so now I'm just ignoring the memers.
It is bonerrific
And that's complete bull shit.
Most people are attracted to underage girls.
It's modern society that has made it a bad thing and created a random number to differentiate between what is ok and what is not ok.
Was going to say something about you using cub to mark your latent urges to diddle children, but you just attempted to justify your own attraction to little girls. Care to shoot your other foot as well?
I'd say there is more of a subjective idea throughout western cultures concerning what age is acceptable for someone to be allowed to be sexually active.
12: Old enough to reproduce.
16: Legally acceptable in many states.
18: Legally acceptable in all states.
So, if the age is 16 or even 18, what is the difference if they are start one day early? Why not two days? How far back will it actually make a difference?
I'm not arguing for any age. It's an open based questions.
Because, you fucking rocketscientists, these laws try and protect people that don't know better from faggots like you.
With 18, if you're dumb enough to let some fucking neckbeard take your fucking virginity, well, tough titty, you're old enough to know better dumbass.
14 years old? that's stilla little fucking babychild that likes bunny hairclips, you fucktard
Alright... So, would you say that someone is gay if they fapped to gay art? I mean, it's just drawn.
You are a completely different person at 18 than you were at 16. Anyway, I have no objections if they are BOTH underage and in love (I don't support it, but I don't think it deserves legal action), but you have to be fucked up to think that it's okay for a 40 year old man to have sex with a little girl.
So, you admit that under 18 is too young because the law stipulates legal ramifications if said law is broken. No actual facts. Just intents. Because at some point, some realized at age 18 "Magic happens that day", and before that day, it's impossible for them to know better.
Like I said. I don't argue for any age in particular, it's a subjective age. Very much not rocket science, but very much a social view that has become acceptable.
I was having sex when I was 15.
Most kids I knew start having sex between 13-16.
none of us were traumatized by it. we want to be doing it.
You 30yr old virgin neckbeards need to lighten up.
In my opinion, if a person is old enough to get horny that means they are old enough to get sex.
THAT DOES NOT MEAN THAT THEY SHOULD THOUGH YOU FUCKING MORON
And stop ruining this thread with your goddamn fucking childporn. For fucks sake dude what the HELL is wrong with you?
Literally the ONLY fucking thing 4chan doesn't like to see and here you go, arguing about how it's totally legit to like it.
/b/ disagrees with you. Can't you see how messed up you are in your fucking head?
I never tried to make a point about an extreme age gap. A 40 year old with a minor? Why not 30? Still just as illegal. Anything 18+ with an under 18 is illegal (with some exceptions of 16 years of age depending on the state).
And a person can change drastically from age 16 to 18... or just as easily change very little. Everyone is going to be different in that regard.
I'm not even trying to argue against lowering the age or removing any laws to protect youth from sexual predators. My argument is that the age of consent, in terms of what makes a person a pedo for an attraction to certain ages, to some extent can be subjective given a certain cultures approach to the subject.
s/fur = female solo, female/female, female/male, or multiple female and/or male with sexual focus on the female.
g/fur = male sole or multiple males
h/fur = herms in any varations with male or female
Imagine a thread focused on bondage and you try to post pic of someone with a blind fold on. Does it meet the criteria for bondage? No. You missed the point of the content.
Not sure if you're arguing for my point that age can be subjective, or against my point for it. It's almost like you're arguing that age doesn't really matter for some individuals, so that makes me wrong for saying age can be subjective.
Clearly one of us is confused.
I'm actually a third party debating a concept. I didn't post any images. Also, I didn't say it was legit, good, actually acceptable, or anything of the like. I argued the concept of it being subjective given the view of a western culture.
I was very clear that I did not argue for or against the current status of legality or social standards of age.
Just because I didn't demonize the other guy for liking it or plague him with 1000 curses doesn't mean that I endorse him or demand everyone start fucking children because it's actually okay. Calm the fuck down.