can someone please explain to me why they find loli attractive?
how can you prefer little 2d girls to adult sexy 2d girls
That's like asking to explain any fetish. Shit gets me rock hard, I can't put it into words for you.
What I list off as attractive to me might be disgusting to you, it's subjective.
I take both, bruh, I don't discriminate. I just like loli more because I have a fetish for very small sized bodies, so loli fits perfectly. Midgets are disproportionate and tits are generally a turn off when when the body supporting them is as thin as I like.
Well not rape per say. People fap to different variants of loli, I happen to like the solo pictures not the violent rape ones. Either types are highly questionable if walked in on mid fap compared to "regular porn" so yes and no.
Stuff like this
Or this. Although this can barely be called loli depending on who you ask.
This is now a loli thread, perferts
lolis with pubic hair is a subfetish that gets me diamond
id gladly lick it clean
A red-headed loli, half the size of her fucker, spitting up about a pint of cum after not being able to swallow it all. Given that she was deepthroating a cock rather deeply - shown by her running mascara - that is larger than her arms it's both understandable and fucking hot. It was recent too, since you can see the cum/saliva still joining her mouth to the cock.
>Hebephilia is the strong and persistent adult sexual interest in pubescent (early adolescent) individuals, typically ages 11–14
This is what most of 4chan identifies with. Most. Not all. Not all inclusive.
Etna is 1000+ years old and still a loli. It's a body type, bro, not an age.
They're pedophiles, and loli is a legal loophole for them to fap to; since it does not feature real children, it is not "child pornography".
They're no less disgusting for it, either, and all of them should consider suicide, or at least psychotherapy...
Artist only made that one image of her as far as I can tell.
I know, it fucking sucks. Have this 3-image set to compensate. It's almost as good.
Money buys happiness, bruh. That's all I'm saying.
It's an attraction to neotenic features, and it's pretty common. The women of many ethnicity display them (Japanese, African, etc), even into adulthood, because they're commonly selected by males.
Essentially, its the distinction between cute and sexy, or the combination of the two (as the Japanese like to say, moe).
Summer is the shit, mayne. Shorts, dresses, skirts, tank tops, and with the hyper-sexual world we're becoming thanks to "progressivism" I'd say it's a good time to be alive.
for me its just drawn > real life.. hell I have trouble getting an erection to any real life shit
likes loli.. faps to loli sometimes.. would never consider touching a child or looking at them like that
there is a clear distinction between real and drawn.. and some people obviously can't see that
also.. fucking normie
There's also a clear distinction between real and photographs. To those that dislike both, it's easy to lump them together - and personally, I don't think they're wrong in doing so.
the thing is, when taking a photograph, you need a subject to be photographed, thus there is another person involved appart from the photographer
when talking about drawings, there is no need for a subject for the painter to draw, they can use their imagination, thus nobody but the painter is involved
do you get my drift?
I'm not talking about taking photographs, I'm talking about viewing them.
The only argument against this is that it might lead to demand for more, thus promoting an imoral industry.
What, then, about photographs taken by parents, or family members in general, that aren't inherently sexual in nature?
Then that point becomes totally invalid, and we can discuss what I actually meant - there's a clear distinction between real and photographs. Do you really think people are incapable of separating the two?
And compared to say, five years ago, we're deviants on the path to sin. I like to think of it more in terms of relation than factual on account of not being alive during the ancient times.
Tina Sprout. She's in Black Bullet.
it's really quite simple.. I was never allowed to explore intimacy and sexuality while I was young, so there's still something in my brain that longs for childish innocence in a sexual context
I think there my be people unable to do so, as there are clear cases of people not discerning between reality and ficiton. What can be done about the photographs that are not explicit in content is, for instance, restrict the ways in which people could get hold of them, like not posting them on fb like every idiot does nowadays, that would slow that matter.
Personally, it's like asking why you're hetero/homo. It's just something that is here. All you can do is accept it or deny it.
And I won't deny it just because society says it's "not natural". And it's not because we like lolis that we are raping childrens.
That whole path to sin bit came from Judaism, which came from Zoroastrianism. But, back when there was just Zoroastrianism, and kingdoms like Babylon were civilization itself, sex was love and life. It was no sin. This was mirrored in many civilizations, perhaps most famously ancient Greece.
To get to the point where we were when America was founded required the catholic church, its reformation, and the puritan movements that followed. It's pretty recent dogma in the big scheme of things.
There are also people who can't distinguish between these fantasies and reality in the case of loli. I don't think that's the majority in either case. I say this, because I've met a lot of these people in situations where they felt comfortable expressing themselves. I've also met prosecuted sex offenders, in situations where they were legally obligated to share. The differences between these people were like night and day.
>tfw you will never be a loli and people would love you for who you are
This is exactly why we need to reform the way we approach pedophilia. A sexual attraction shouldn't be demonized to the point where people hate themselves. Sure, it shouldn't be considered acceptable, but most pedos can be helped, and their illegal actions (if being considered) prevented. The majority just like fapping to pictures on the internet though, and fuck anyone who thinks loli is worse than rape.
Glanced? Anon, I take a full stare at them, and fantasize about them if I like how they look. Hell, I'll introduce myself if it's in a public place as well.
I'm allowed to do it too because I wear a uniform and am not a social outcast.
explain why you find [insert your fetish here] sexy
>hurr durr because its natural
so is mine
>but i dont like it
>so its not natural
why is yours natural?
>cus i like it
hows that different than what i said?
>well im natural and ur not
this is the conversation we're having and its retarded
Bruh, have you heard moralfags talk about kids? Most of them dislike them for one reason or another. Parents pretty much only like their own children, men see them as extra weight when getting into a relationship, and women see them as leverage.
kids are the future
they should be treated with respect and spoken to intelligently
they should also be given all the protections from society that their parents feel necessary and are able to give
at the same time, this makes them a huge responsibility, and like any responsibility, no matter how important, people complain
A friend of mine introduced it to me. I had already liked hentai at the time and was curious about this fetish, and him holding the nickname of "porn man" I asked him about it and he showed me the albums on his phone.
To an extent; I'm personally not into monogamous relationships, or even relationships in general. I just want to wake up covered with lolis every morning to take care of.
I wish i knew why people just go from Facebook to twitter to instagram. Some people just abandon their accounts.
People can say that as much as they want to, but their actions show that they either don't care enough or that they're hypocrites. Fact is that the majority of people don't really care for children.
What I've learned from this tread is:
>hide your power level
>raise a child with respect, intelligence, and from a close distance
>it's OK to look once and a while
>loli is a body type
>open minded friends are rare and a god send
of course they are, hypocrisy is human nature
parents use the phrase "day as I say not as I do" for a reason
also, I'd love to see some polling data supporting your claim
Want to know why people like 2D lolicon? Because a lot of our popular porn actresses look like this.
>totally shaved and waxed pussy
and a lot of (18+) Asian porn actresses (a few western ones, but barely any) also have
It should be obvious that all of these are features of youthfulness. Mature women have large breasts, wide hips, thicker arms and legs, and a hairy pussy. If you reflect these features in 2D, and then correct for the unattractive flaws of ageing, you're going to end up with a female character who looks about 11-13 years old. Don't blame me. Blame all the females who shave their bushes so religiously. I never found it attractive in 3D, where I prefer a good, healthy bush any day of the week.
When you add in personality to this equation of youthfulness, it all seems to click, though. The classic archetype of femininity is a girl who is still pure and innocent. This archetype still hangs around because sluts who can take ten dicks in a row without even blushing tend to turn off a lot of men.
There's an inherently higher risk of contracting an STD from a slut, your children will be full of other men's DNA, which attaches itself to the slut's gene code like semen stains on a business suit (science backs this up). In a way, lolicon is a rebellion against Third Wave Feminism, which teaches all western college girls to become sluts and to race-mix with thuggish niggers and spics.
I'm not personally attracted to little kids. I think they're dumb, ugly, and I have trouble relating to them. I also sometimes have trouble reading 2D lolicon where the girl character in the story is a grade-schooler who talks like a little kid and has little kid problems. That said, if the author of the work understands that the grade-school setting is just a metaphor for purity, and is able to make the character act like an adult stuck in the body of a child, then everything just seems to work out.
There isn't going to be a poll, possibly ever, considering that no one will admit "hey, I don't like anyone else's kids" even if it were administrated under anonymity - there's no integrity. Similar to how people were lying even on dick size polls.
The actions I mentioned before are in reference to blanket rules and generalizations made for children by their guardians and lawmakers. Their individuality is cast aside for the most part, when regulations for them are brought up, and they are all considered to be this lump of flesh incapable of thought or consequential action - they are considered to be in need of assistance until whatever age is considered to be maturity, and then tasked to figure everything out on their own afterwards.
It appears to be a shota-ization photoshop of this.
My stance on this as well. I don't see why it should be illegal either. Nobody is harmed that way, and satisfying my fetish to that may even prevent people with less self-control from propagating or even engaging in abuse of real children.
If no one has said it, and my experiences show otherwise, why should I believe you when you say people don't like kids? I already talked about the nature of their burden, and I admit that leads to a lot of frustrations, but as a species we're hardwired to look past those frustrations for the sake of the next generation. That's why we're alive.
Now, in this new post, you began stating more specifically that people don't like other people's children, and not the more general statement you began with - but people also don't like other people. I'm not sure how much you can separate the two issues. I do know that our main tool for overcoming this has been religion though - which makes sense. People are pretty nice to other people's kids at churches and places like that.
I don't think loli is an adequate substitute for cp. I can't say that with confidence because I don't like to look at cp, but then again, maybe part of why I don't like cp has to do with it being inherently different than lolicon. With cp, I can't help but think that the girl in question is being taken advantage of, and doesn't really understand what's happening or why. With 2D lolicon, there is no guilt and I'm free to take the characters at face value.
I can't even look at the pictures unless the girl is in the high school range, maybe 16 y.o. or so, and pretty well on her way to being developed - in other words, legal to get married in most countries in the world. The more time I spend around actual little kids (younger relatives and their friends), the less I can see them as anything other than asexual, overgrown infants that need to be completely protected from all influences of lewdness and degeneracy.
There are many types of CP, and you're stereotyping its consumers as people who only appreciate PTHC. I'd say the majority just want nudes. That's why bath videos are so popular on youtube. For those people, loli can be a good substitution, but it mostly has to do with exposure. People who like loli are usually people who grew up watching cartoons, found rule 34, and found loli. Most consumers of CP didn't have those experiences in their early life to guide their sexual fantasies and pornographic consumption.
I don't expect you to believe me, nor am I intending to change your mind on the subject. I am simply explaining what my perspective is of the issue and why I see it as such. Furthermore the requirements of our species has shifted since the past - with the establishment of civilizations came the release of many of the fundamental problems we have had. Neither of us can say why people are alive or why they do what they do, as everyone has a different reason, so the point is overall moot.
My original post also contained the same idea, so I don't know why you believe it's new. In regards to religion however, it has been a crutch since the beginning of life for people to lean on in order to guide them with morality and action. I would like to believe that religious people are typically only kind to others in general because they have to be, but that isn't always the case obviously.
>But what's your point?
I'm just curious about how many pedophiles feel both physically and mentally attracted to children, and how many just prefer the type of body.
You're right though, I'd imagine not many people would be attracted to a 14 year olds personality.
Sexual preference is what gender you're sexually attracted to. It has nothing to do with age.
And both sexual preference and fetishes aren't a choice, and both refer to exclusively sexual attraction.
I am sexually and romantically attracted to prepubescent girls. I don't really know what term one could use for this, given that pedophilia is typically seen as pure physical attraction. I was just informing you that some of us do like the personalities, as well as the bodies of children.
As a religious person, I can tell you that I just want others to be happy. I believe in serving others as a spiritual practice - not because of some reward or punishment I've convinced myself of, but because it brings me closer to humanity and to myself. That's what my spirituality is all about, and there are many religions that see it the same way.
Now, I know your original post also talked about not liking other people's children, but your last one only talked about it, which made the point I was making irrelevant. I was just trying to be fair.
And, when it comes to the state of humanity itself, I don't think either of us can even make educated guesses about what is or what is not a moot point - because you're right, there has been a lot of change recently.
Nah. Unless you're flagged while downloading it and the LEA in your country is seriously in need of funding/publicity, don't worry about it.
>pedophilia is typically seen as pure physical attraction
Yeah, but it's
as a description of an individual who has a sexual interest in children. You may love children, but because you are also sexually attracted to them, you're a pedophile.
Liking them for their personalities too doesn't make you any less of a pedophile.
Hebephilia is just another age range. I am a pedophile in that I like girls between 4 and 11, I was just speculating at if there was an inherent difference between romantic and physical attraction and purely physical.
The religions may see it that way, but the practitioners may not. It's cool that you behave the way you do simply because you care for humanity, but others do because they don't want to suffer a god's wrath or disapproval. Without getting too much into theology or history, I'll just say that peoples' actions do not always stem from noble intentions.
Then there are people who hold no regard for religion. But that's another topic entirely.
I've switched a lot. I was born a Christian, became a Buddhist, then moved towards Hinduism out of respect for the yogic traditions (serving others is one of the paths to Brahman). Though, I also respect Judaism for its interpretations / transformations, which are well documented in the Talmid.
If you put a gun to my head though, I'd probably still say I'm a Christain. I agree with the dalai lama when he said that we best serve ourselves and the world by practicing the religion of the community/family we're a part of.
Sounds good, I just roll with life. I have this sort of balance between fate dealing us a hand and that's our life but it's not set in stone because we kept a few cards up our sleeves, get what I'm saying?
I like a certain type of girl. Preferred body type being small in all categories. Preferred personality being kind of like that of a little sister. Annoying in a cute way and very loving and attached. It just so happens that most with these qualities fall within the age range I previously outlined. Bottom line is, I would still like a fourteen year old if she was cute and endearing.
Ah, in that case, it's still the person. For me it's a physical attraction. I can't stand the idea of actually involving myself romantically with children, so maybe that's why the number doesn't matter.
I ask because I see people giving age ranges a lot to explain their attraction. I have found myself uninterested in girls as well, until I hear their age. For example if I see a somewhat, but overall not so, attractive girl I wouldn't think much of her. But if I find out that her age fits in the range I find attractive, I begin lusting after her. I was wondering if this is common.
I know what you mean, my hand was pretty average and so I cheat and steal when the needs arise but I will share my profit with others kinda like Robin Hood.
>this is no longer a semi loli thread
That's not it though, since I find their bodies superior to older women in general. Age typically doesn't matter to me, unless it's in the previously mentioned example.
Friendly loli kik group.
Discuss & post loli.