It's time for another round of attacks.
>spam the OC we produced from Pepsi's Twitter to sites like:
>whatever other shitty types of accounts you might have/or are willing to quickly sign up to for this purpose
I'm currently typing up a direct message to send to Pepsi to demand that Judy Hopps wins the name competition and reward us with 'full-body Judy Hopps waifu pillows.'
Oh I'm sorry. Do you not like this idea? I do. It's bump time!!!
OP here. I want all the input you want to give to the DM to Pepsi.
>in case you haven't seen the new OC on the hastag
hahaha that's beautiful
I can say something like 'quantity over quality" is more important.
I can also mention Utilitarianism and say that making the Judy Hopps name the winner causes the most happiness.
I also have an idea that we could try to get Pepsi to tweet that they 'would fugg the bunny." Like some way to trick them into saying it. Maybe in the DM I might say that 'fugg' means 'forceful hugging' and then convince them to tweet that Pepsi would fugg the bunny.
OP here, I just replied to a nigger who's butthurt about the racism.
You and your trips and your ideas... Your not not the hero we deserve but the hero we need.
>you are going on 4chan
>and saying theres nothing wrong with being jewish
>pic related was the last thing that happened to the person who said that
We're spamming #UncleDrewAKA with this image, the meme queen, help me post it :)
>spam the link to this thread in other threads
>post useful pics, etc
>make Twitter account to post with us
Preferably, funny, clever, sexual, violent, offensive, CONTROVERSIAL.
>relating to Judy Hopps
>relating to Pepsi > Coca Cola
At this point, we're going through ideas of direct messaging Pepsi to demand that we win the name contest, demand Judy Hopps waifu full body pillows, and/or convince Pepsi to tweet that they 'would fugg the bunny'
Read through the thread for info.
your a german defending a jew!?!
>anne frank's lover detected
Dude this thread is kill
Next time post zootopia in OP
OP here. I'm writing the DM and will send and post soon. Bump the thread.
I don't know dude this meme look a lil forced to me
I'm here just because it's zootopia
Help me finish writing the intro as a mock to the Anonymous creed.
We Are Judy Hopps
As you may have noticed, we have entered your name contest on your hashtag #UncleDrewAKA.
We subscribe to the Utilitarian principle of 'the greatest amount of good for the greatest number' and we believe you might as well. As a result, we have already won your contest through our 'quantity' over 'quality' of name submissions. As Judy Hopps will win, more people will be happier than the one non-Judy person who would be the sole receiver of happiness from winning the contest.
We simply want one of three things as our reward: 1) We want an official title that Judy Hopps wins the contest. 2) We want full-body Judy Hopps waifu pillows. 3) We want Pepsi's Twitter account to say they "would fugg the bunny" (fugg = forcefully hug).
This was a raid the first day, now is a forced meme
I'm here from the beginning, i'm OP of the first thread lasted 7 hours, was in the second that got deleted....
I'm the only one posting
You posted nazi and racial stuff
Won't happen, they are not idiots
You are not the original OP. I started this whole raid, moron. It's sad you would claim that. The real original OP would continue this raid until something epic happens, which is what I'm doing.
What a loser.
>Also, this because your grammar is terrible
There was a thread " dubs decide what we post on pepsi's #uncledrewaka ", judy won
Then thread 404d and i made the thread lasted 7 hrs
I'm dis guy
And this post >>683263586 is not me
as i said i made the one lasted 7hrs
Btw i'm outta here i'm getting an headache
I just love being me. I can't think of anyone else I'd rather be.
You're a fucking Mexican that can't even speak English properly and you added me to your Twitter and you're pretending to be me, the originator of this raid.
I'm flattered, a little creeped out but flattered.
100m get never furget
Go ahead, show us how much more retarded you are.
WHY DO I WANT TO FUCK THIS RABBIT
Hutcheson was the first to use the phrase, and it was catchy, so it caught on. But using the first postulation of a theory and ignoring centuries of refinement isn't a good way to prove your point.
The actual doctrine of Utilitarianism only specifies that "the right action is the one that maximizes utility" it's a subtle difference, but it creates different results. It's one of the first things they teach you if you go to a worthwhile college.
Mixing in lies makes you incorrect.
In universities they teach you how "killing one to save a thousand" is an example of Utilitarianism.
>in the same way a contest being won by 3 people (gold medal, silver medal, bronze medal) gives more happiness than just 1 person with a gold medal
Anti-natalism is also Utilitarian, albeit "negative Utilitarianism." This means arguing that humans should stop procreating because they will suffer more than they will be happy in aggregate total of happinesss vs suffering.
You don't even understand what the fuck you're talking about. You're dumb.
You do realize both of your examples fall under the utilitarian maxim "the right action is the one that maximizes utility" right?
I don't think you understand what "subtle" means.
even worse than the other shitty video you posted
You think this is original, you little shit?
What are you, 12?
Also 'worthy of using this site', get fucking over yourself. /b/ has always been a complete shithole, you think you're in some exclusive club?
Jesus Christ people.
You sound like a Kazon.
Biting that b8 hard aren't ya retard.
I'm the the guy you're arguing with, but read literally the first sentence of the article LOL. He's right.
Also, pic related.
I posted this >>683270927
Notice the part about hedonism, obviously that's the view I subscribe to, he's opposing a different view of it. There's no right or wrong version of Utilitarianism. He's just dumb enough to think the opposite of what he believes is wrong.
Infinitechan, normies are too faggoty to go there as long as 4chan exists.
What are you trying to prove? That "the greatest good for the greatest amount of people" is the Utilitarian principle? Because it isn't.
"Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the best moral action is the one that maximizes utility."
"utilitarianism is generally held to be the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good"
Neither says "the greatest good for the grestest amount" They both say it's about "maximizing utility" which was what he said it was about. He's right.
>What are you trying to prove? That "the greatest good for the greatest amount of people" is the Utilitarian principle? Because it isn't.
You're incorrect saying it's incorrect.
How is this so hard to understand?
greater happiness > less happiness = Utilitarianism
>what do you not understand about this sentence
I see you're again ignoring the two general descriptions of utilitarianism.
Also, if you can't see how "greater happiness > less happiness" is different from "the greatest good for the greatest amount" you really should go back to school.
Just admit you're incorrect.
>are you suggesting Standford is wrong?
Also, ""utilitarianism is generally held to be the view that the morally right action is the action that produces the most good" is from the same article. Are you suggesting that is is wrong?
It's a philosophy, dumbass, there is not right or wrong, it's all beliefs. The particular hedonistic view of Utilitarianism I'm referring to is the one that came first.
What's morally right is that which causes pleasure. In your stupid view, it's probably a religious belief or some stupid secular belief that can actually take away pleasure while being "morally right." But pleasure is much simpler, everyone values it equally. Everyone wants pleasure, their desires.
LOL when both of you skip the general descriptions of the utilitarian principle that both agree with that other guy to cherry pick quotes that support you.
Neither of you have said why we should ignore those general descriptions and instead go with the more specific ones you picked.
It is incorrect to call it "THE utilitarian principle" it is not.
THE utilitarian principle is "the morally right action is the one that produces the most utility"
Posted in the picture is A utilitarian principle - a more specific version of the general principle listed above.
Can you guys really not see the difference between the two?
Constant OC being produced here.
And explain your definition of "the morally right action"
>this is a cultural definition which varies between cultures
The thing that is united by all of them is the fact that all people want to experience pleasure/happiness/their desires over the opposite, which is misery.
Which is why, this isn't incorrect. >>683262424
If I said something like "I subscribe to the democratic principle of government transparency" it doesn't mean I'm saying it's the only principle of democracy.
I hate pseudointellectual contrarians who do nothing more than argue semantics.
Please remove the dick our of your ass.