it looks retardedly disproportionate to the rest of her
one of the names she goes by is kalyn arianna. does this hot deep throat porn as a cheerleader. haven't been able to find very many vids of her tho. she also goes by some other name or two, a good tag to search for her with is "sinnistar"
Anyone else see the similarities
the captcha is fucking annoying
does anyone have the one where the guy jerks off onto a chicks face, and she gives two thumbs up at the end? she has like bright blue eyes and short hair.
>Posting a porn thread on /b/
>/gif/ allows for webMs with sound, and /b/ doesn't
>/gif/ allows for bigger file sizes
Are you even trying anymore?
>>/gif/ is about a thousand times slower than /b/
That's because all the faggots on this sight flock to /b/ because.... well I don't exactly know WHY /b/ is the most popular board, but it is.
>Can't shitpost as freely
/gif/ is not meant for shitposting, it's about sharing and posting porn webMs, and that's it.
Anyone got the amateur webm where the guy is getting blowed by a girl without hands hard and he cums right inside her mouth and the cum just overflows out of her mouth? Forgot to save it.
public sex is so fucking hot wish my wife was more daring. only got her to suck me off in a theater once when it was pretty much empty and we were in the very top row of stadium seating .
if your original clip's structure is like this:
simply rearranging it to:
...doesn't make it "loop" any more than it already did
it's literally the same thing, but it just starts at a different moment
the word "loop" (or what's most often meant by it, a "seamless loop") loses all meaning if applied like this, since every clip is a loop in that case
ex did that to me
>girlfriend is usually home around 7
>it's past 11 and no word
>she picks up
>"where you at?"
>her breathing is labored
>says she's at her friend melissa's house
>suspicious so i lie and say melissa just called looking for her
>hear a male voice say "hang up"
nah. i was a total bitch.
>tried calling her a million times that night
>waited until she came home
>she came home after i usually leave for work
>told her i forgive her
>things were cold for a few days
>realize i'm being a bitch
>on the friday, after a week of this shit, came home for lunch
>packed all of my clothes and a few other things
>left the key on the table
>never spoke to her again
C'mon. What the fuck was she doing? I need closure!
Rearranging the structure of footage is the only way to ever make a loop in editing. Do you think natural looping exists somehow?
A video will ALWAYS have to have a start and an end point. Creating a loop is only ever a process of hiding the edit point.
In this case it's a simple matter of making the end and start frames sequential, but you can get more sophisticated and employ morphing etc...
Basically you're an imbecile who wanted to try and feel smart about something without really knowing what the fuck they were talking about.
the "edit point" isn't even hidden you fucking retard
it would be 100% as much of a loop without the edit as it is with it, whoever "edited" that did a completely effortless offset shift and if you really think that warrants saying "wow what a perfect loop", then I really don't know what to say
Don't. People may think they are comfortable but that's just because they're padded eBay car seats.
Since you're spending $500, get a used Herman Miller Aeron or there's some good new ergonomic chairs around that price as well.
Who do you trust, a "gamer" company that sells chairs by putting logos on it, or a company that's been selling chairs to executives worth millions, even billions? For the last 20 years?
Also, you get a 2 year warranty. Let's look at something comparable.
Herman Miller Sayl is $500 USD brand new. It's also covered by a 12-year warranty on all parts.
Can any anon help me find a particular porn. I saw a part of it on youtube few years ago. It showed a milf and a guy were having dinner, the milf stood up and bent towards the guy to kiss him. The guy started touching her huge ass. The milf noticed it and pulled her dress up. This continued for a while and then the milf went to the bed. This is it. I could not find it on youtube anymore. I need this video desperately . Can anons help me?
Of course it's hidden you dipshit. That's the whole point of a loop! It's literally two sequential frames! The only reason you notice it is because webm's stutter when restarting.
What, you expect the loop to be in the middle of the video? What happens when the clip ends and restarts then. Create another loop to fix it? What the fuck do you think a loop is?!
Without the edit in the right place the video would jump from one mismatched frame to another and it wouldn't loop at all. What the fuck are you even talking about?
You can start throwing pseudo-jargon like "offset shift" around if you like, but that might only work to convince morons that you know what the fuck you are talking about?
This is the most textbook example of inventing something to condescend over to seem knowledgeable, without knowing shit about the subject I've seen on here.
Possibly an old fag. Videos didn't always work on b
yo check this horizontally perfect loop I made out of jolie's portrait, I think I did a pretty good job "hiding the edit" too
that picture is directly analogous to the edit done to the video, the only difference is it uses two scenes so I could do that with a picture of two portraits side by side but the idea is the same
You think these two frames (which are the first and last in the video) are two seperate camera angles.?
No it isn't at all. Especially as you can't use a single image as an analogy to a multi frame edit.
>No it isn't at all. Especially as you can't use a single image as an analogy to a multi frame edit.
cut a bit from the end, paste at the beginning (or the other way around, doesn't matter)
that is LITERALLY all that has been done to the clip
so basically you're saying every clip in existence is a loop if you can't see the playbar thing that indicates the current position in the video
>cut a bit from the end, paste at the beginning (or the other way around, doesn't matter)
that is LITERALLY all that has been done to the clip
That is LITERALLY all a loop is!
>so basically you're saying every clip in existence is a loop if you can't see the playbar thing that indicates the current position in the video
Every clip in existence that's ending frame and beginning frame are sequential yes.
There are plenty of videos that stop and start on non sequential frames, and that's why they don't loop. How are you not getting this?
if you repeat a clip, you're essentially going around a circle, it will loop, changing where you start on the circle changes nothing about the workings of the loop
the unedited clip would loop just as much as the "edited" one if you repeat the clip, the only difference is where it started and once the loop is going it no longer even matters
No if you repeat a clip it will repeat, and nothing more, most likely you will get what looks like a messy jump cut because the end and start frame wont match.
Clips do not automatically loop.
This clip has been edited to loop, so naturally you can now move the start and end point anywhere along the timeline and it'll still work.
This isn't some naturally occurring wonder, it's a product of it's fucking editing.
>There are plenty of videos that stop and start on non sequential frames, and that's why they don't loop.
but you don't know where it starts the next iteration if you can't see the playbar, how would you know if the starting and ending frames are not sequential when you don't know where they are, that was the point (the clip in question is indistinguishable in its unedited form and edited form if you can't see the playbar to determine where the "file" starts)
also according to you they do loop, because you just need to start the clip from some chosen position and then that starting frame will be the next frame after the next iteration's final frame, "perfect loop"
>most likely you will get what looks like a messy jump cut because the end and start frame wont match.
and all that's done to the clip in question is that messy jump cut is somewhere in the middle of the clip
>This clip has been edited to loop, so naturally you can now move the start and end point anywhere along the timeline and it'll still work.
assuming both are on repeat, you can do this to the unedited one as well and it will work just the same
>assuming both are on repeat, you can do this to the unedited one as well and it will work just the same
What? No. The "unedited" one is the original video, and I highly doubt in fact I'm positive that doesn't loop.
edited (cut from end, paste to beginning):
now let's put them both on repeat and let's start them at the points where I've put the apostrophe:
exactly the same result will be produced if you're not paying attention to the playbar
if we start them both from the beginning they will also be exactly the same with the only difference being the other one will be a little ahead of the other
You're misrepresenting the editing process for the sake of your argument.
This clip has been deliberately edited to loop, it may not be a complicated edit, but the argument that because it's simple somehow makes it bad is ridiculous and just an excuse to feel superior.
I only skipped the part where the edit drops entire sections of the whole video, I thought that would be really fucking obvious
the two scenes used one after the other unedited would be what I meant, that's where the editor does the pseudo-loop thing by cut and pasting
it doesn't change my point in any way
>the argument that because it's simple somehow makes it bad
that was never the argument, it's not inherently bad but what is ridiculous is people calling it a perfect loop as if it's somehow amazing