graphics look awesome, but wait for it to be the undead child of Hardline and Battlefront, be riddled with fucking silly meele weapons, idiotic pickups (like the guy in full plate armour from the trailer) and fucking riddled with $$ to be spent on content and micro shit like your mace, shovel, or whatever.
Game gonna be pretty shit, the hype train will derail like it did for Hardline and Battlefront.
Christ. I haven't played an FPS in ages (I've had a string of potato computers since 2011), but I hate how much FPSs have turned to shit. They used to have some semblance of plot and require more brains than a chimp to play. Now it's all fucking casuals.
>I can play as a black women in battle
>I can play in a propaganda game meant to rewrite history and blackwash/femwash everything and get PC points from Anita
10/10 like Skyrim with guns
The real question is what's wrong with you? That game was a crapfest sub-par generic shooter with little to no merit. It looks amazing graphic wise, but other than that it's pretty bland and got old quick. You even played Unreal?
answering on a less forced agressive note : indeed, plot can be good for classics. We've seen Beyond Good and Evil, the MGS series, The old Deus Exs, and other games that made it into our mind because of their plot (and gameplay).
Then what is saddening about video games as whole right now is how "content" seems to be the only drive for buying a game. For example, some people wan't buy Devil Dagger's because it lacks content when its gameplay is more than enough to justify its price. On the other hand, Destiny, despite having hours of grinding content, can't match the gameplay of other classic arenas, and yet seems to be more justified as a 50$ game in the eyes of people.
That's how we are forced to see countless instances of BF and COD games, with more and more grinding, and no memorable gameplay whatsoever but the old recycled formula.
And don't get me started on the new UT and the new Doom...
I know I'll get shit on (and it will be justified), but the last good groundbreaking FPSes I've played were Titanfall and Overwatch. That is how sad it gets nowadays.
No hard feelings brother, we are just having fun. Shithead.
Never been a big battlefield guy but it looks good. About as quality as is expected from DICE. Though I won't be suprised if they fuck it up like Hardline and Star Wars. Also, everyone who's hyped about the "new" shovel is a fuckin moron. There's been a trench shovel before, I think in BC2 or BF1942.
AYOOO HOL UP
SO U BE SYIN WE WUZ WAR HEROES ANNNDDD SHIEEET
Hopefully it will have Battlefront graphics or better, and with a good game behind it
Having a black person on the cover of a game that's set in the most devastating war ever, costing more than 20 million (predominantly white) lives, is just tasteless. Just as tasteless as having white people on the cover of a game about thieves.
all very true. haven't played titanfall or overwatch. wanted to get titanfall but was actually w/o internet when it came out lol. personally i liked the crysis games, wbu? they certainly weren't perfect, but i thought the gameplay and plot were innovative enough to be interesting. not to mention dose gfx lol
The biggest thing that's going to hold it back is the fan base divide. The fans of other BF games that have had 20th century settings will love the return to the time period and the shift in game play towards that style. And fans of the new BF games will all modern stuff will hate it for that same reason. I've seen both sides of it and I can already see that's what will happen. Meaning they are going to have to get rid of some realism for the sake of maintaining the casual fandom that brings in profit. They'll have to add mechanics that ease the play for players who aren't good with 20th century war tactics or weapon mechanics. It'll feel less like a true BF game in this way, which further divides the fan base.
I hate to speak on a serious note, but blacks from colonies were put on the front lines before white people on this war. Even though that might have been half a million, it wasn't their war.
It's going to have to do a lot to catch up to Arma mods
How is this going to be marketed? I mean I can imagine some random guy in Gamestop watching some popular FPS games and first he sees some futuristic war game and then the next game has a cover with a nigger on it who is holding a gun and a club. Which one would he choose? I can imagine the dialogue with his friend:
>Hey Mickey, look it's a game with a nigger on cover!
>A fucking nigger, never thought I would live to see this day!
kek. I thought that you are joking or something. XD
But there is that kind of game on EA Origin.
No, man. XD Please NO. After these year fiascos: DooM, BattleBorn, OverWatch, another shitty overpriced game. Please NO.
Actually, Crysis 1 is still one of my favorites, just because of how much of a sandbox it can be. I would advise you to play Titanfall, but way for Titanfall 2, he first game is dead now.
I really don't see why everyone is jerking their dick so hard about it. I mean, WW1 and WW2 aren't very different. The technology, the parties involved, the locations of battle, are all pretty much the same. And we've had at least 2 good WW2 BF games. So why does everyone care so much about WW1? I mean, woo trenches and woo mustard gas but what is substantially different? Other than the technology being even worse than in WW2
>WW1 and WW2 aren't very different. The technology, the parties involved, the locations of battle, are all pretty much the same.
>instead of offering a counter argument or an answer to the question, I'll just shitpost
>I have no counter argument, so your post isn't worth one
Sounds about right
>I SAYZ, HOL UP
*looks at long fingernail
*Thinks of fried chicken
>WE SOLDIERS 'N SHITZ?
*Steals a bike and rides away.
shit tier numbering system strikes again.
>Thanks Resident Evil
>Fuck you Konami
>This game will suck balls
I wonder what idea will Dice and EA pull out of their asses for this game? WW1 was nothing but pure trench warfare and them making a game out of the least interesting war in terms if warfare, i gotta say it's gonna be boring
When will they show the real side of ww1
serious question, what game is that?
or is that a real pic?
1st time ever, cant tell
>title says ARMA but is that bait?
graphics that good surely can't exist
Let's see...after they released Bf4 it sucked for a year because of bugs and imbalance. There was actually a time after some patch when I couldn't play for 5 days because they fucked it up. So no, I learned my lesson, not going to buy their shit again.
No srsly, wearing that thing in public basically screams:"Beat me!".
Wilson was a massive racist and segregated the army for the first time since the Civil War
the French had quite a few black troops from the Lybian and Foreign Legions, but they saw combat mostly in the African theaters
same for the British and Germans
the European theater was mostly white troops w/ the exception of some battles in the Ottoman Empire that had some Indian troops
my guess is that the marketing department realized that niggers are the only demographic stupid enough to pre-order in exchange for a gay ass doll
This game is going to be shit for all kinds or reasons, if not only for its historic inaccuracy
>Inb4 Harlem hell fighters
Yes I know, pseudo intellectual. But if you really were well informed you would know that the US joined one year before the end of the war in 1917, and were only actively involved in mop-up battles. 0.3% of the casualties was american in the whole war. Moreover, the only time the harlem guys got their medals and action was in september 1918, UNDER FRENCH COMMAND. They were used as meat shields and the survivors (around 10 of the ENTIRE regiment) got medals.
I have nothing against black skin colour. However, it is moronic when taking the previous facts into account and look within the context of the game, to take a black protagonist.
Google takes just a couple of seconds.
>muh wikipedia is not a source
Wikipedia is sourced moron! And even if you search through Google Scholar. You'll get the same results.
I really want a game which focusses on a race war
>Getting told over and over again that the eradication of your race is a good thing
>the eradication of your race is a good thing
>eradication of your race
Computer science has pretty much been a place for free thinkers since the beginning. Cry some more tho.
i'm the dude that asked, and even I can tell that pic is fucking shopped
graphics that good do not exist in 2016
the harlem hell fighters did serve in the first world war but what they should have done have all the combatants from both sides it would be nice to see different perspectives what do you think
In the trailer they showed an African/Mid East setting. If those fucking DICE cucks are gonna put a black dude on the cover at least make him look like the blacks that actually fought not dress him up like a primarily WHITE soldier.
>squad, red orchestra, arma, verdun, insurgency
GAS THE KIKES
RACE WAR NOW REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
just dont buy it and if you have a friend who says hes going to, fuck him up.
no i'm not even joking. spill his drink on him and slug him in his tiny little balls. If you ever find out he bought it anyway, make him pay.
we -will- take back gaming.
I know that the US was involved in WWI -thanks to the Zimmermann telegram and the bogus Lusitania incident-, but I don't know much about their specific involvement (over here that war is still seen as a very Eurocentric affair), so, were there black battalions as in WWII? Were black soldiers frequently used by the US Army in World War I?
The only thing I can remember being related to a black WWI soldier is the opening scene of Disney's "The Princess and the Frog" where it is implied that Tiana's dad died while on service.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!! GET OUT GET OUT!!!!!
My argument is , that I'm sick of the stupid attempts and cheap tactics used by EA, Bethesda, Blizzard and other "big shit" company. To try to force the gamers to buy their overpriced and stereotypical games. This game is nothing new. Same shit, Different War.
And what is going to happened to the previous games of the series? The servers will be closed like they did to Battlefield 2 ?
how is it politically correct? they did serve now if you told me it about a black trans salami kin android sexual fighting robo central powers with dildo lasers then i would agree
You cucks' wifes are begging us to come though !
Nah, just another console game with no mod support no SDK no dedicated servers no bots but with progressioncrap and always online garbage and lots of stupid achievements and microtransactions and in a couple of months it will be dead like all recent triple a games.
No real beef with it, I find it to be a quality title, especially (ironically enough) the multiplayer part. But like the new UT; the new BFs before this one, and the new CODs, these are just revamps. It is good, but not the best it could be, like a real new groundbreaking Doom. But hey, I might be too picky here.
Yeah but he is going about it like a fucking hipster.
>uhh trip A games are so lame
>not like this 8 bit side scroller that deals with comolex issues and themes and uhhh
AAA games are fine, they have problems, but of course they do
Indeed, we shouldn't be too scornful, AAA games are still a good vector of super quality in the industry. Though when I see games like Escape from Tarkov, I'm forced to share the opinion that Indie's can now do better with still the spirit of freedom and fun in mind.
Not every game can be groundbreaking. It is a huge gamble that usually doesnt pay off. Thats why you have your money bringers, and you little games man. Exactly like hollywood. It is around to make money, not to please you
very true, though movies tend to have more variety to them, like Mad Max and The Raid 2, 2 groundbreaking action movies that are completely different, but still can be considered the ultimate of the genre. We don't have these equivalents right now in video games though, and it is quite sad.
why is there a black guy on the cover? Did blacks even fight in ww 1?
Well it can be picked up by big studios and end up good (I remember the STALKER series, even though it wasn't that indie in the first place). Let's hope it doesn't die that way though.
This is what will happen
The studio will release it on beta. It goes over well but has very noticable bugs, they will then use this to drive up their brand name, and before it is completed it will be sold and released and it will be the same, but people will hate it because some aaa developer put it out.
>American main character
WW1: 28th July 1914 – 11th November 1918
America joins the war: 6th April 1917
Fought for about a year. Wew lad.
>Black main character
From literally the only black unit.
What fucking mental gymnastics.
I would play Arma so much more if they spent more time fixing the online play. The ping spikes I get are fucking horrible, and I'm lucky to find a server below 150ms. I love Insurgency, really looking forward to Sandstorm too.
I'm going to pick up squad and verdun soon when I can afford to.
swedes are traitors of the white race
Look up Harlem hellbreakers or whatever the fuck
Some bad ass mother fuckers right there
>Shout nigger at literally every instance of anything that has the littlest to do with black people
I don't think I've legitimately laughed like this on /b/ in years