Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | Blowjobs | Archived.Moe | 4Archive.org [Home]
4chan archive logo
So how hype are we for Ghostbusters III?
The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood.
Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
You are currently reading a thread in /b/ - Random

Thread replies: 99
Thread images: 22
File: Ghostbusters_1.jpg (181 KB, 1240x826) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Ghostbusters_1.jpg
181 KB, 1240x826
So how hype are we for Ghostbusters III?
>>
It's a reboot not a sequel. Get your facts straight.
>>
Me am super pumped
>>
>>682839472
get your sexuality straight you faggot
>>
Gonna tank and it's gonna be funny as fuck when it does lmao
>>
I fucking hate you cocksucking fucks
>>
>>682839273
about 0% but whatever.
>>
File: Screenshot_18.png (5 KB, 223x94) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Screenshot_18.png
5 KB, 223x94
Damn, the hype is real
>>
>>682839681
damn patriarchy
>>
If it had any good jokes they would have put them in the trailer
the original was just four fucking funny guys (okay, 3, and Winston) who played off each other and were funny. This is just trying to prove women are every bit as good as men, by emulating their previous work instead of doing something original.
>>
>>682839681
I guarantee this is just because of angry bitter virgins.
>>
>we need to milk more franchises
>let's make ghostbuster movie
>let's make cast all female instead male
>PC culture so hip

Where and how do you get the same 500k salary job like the people who come up with this shit
>>
File: Zbusters.jpg (436 KB, 1280x720) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
Zbusters.jpg
436 KB, 1280x720
Not much.
>>
File: UnchainUpdate.jpg (245 KB, 576x178) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
UnchainUpdate.jpg
245 KB, 576x178
I blame the patriarchy.
>>
Ed Wood called. He wants his special effects back.
>>
>>682839273
triggered
>>
>>682839989
> Be Jew
> Be from family working in that industry or similar.
>>
>>682839591
can i suk yo dik?
>>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cKk6XqcmB4Q
>>
>>682839273
muh dick
>>
My prediction: if it tanks, people will blame it on the female cast. If it does well, people will still say it sucks and blame the success on the female cast.
>>
>>682840410
yah ok.. sure.
>>
Well looks like all the old fans are ghosts to this company? They just don't care.
>>
>>682839273
>>682839273
Don't give much of a shit about it. I doubt I'll ever watch it.
>>
>>682839273
0%
>>
File: 1375744647115.png (92 KB, 250x238) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1375744647115.png
92 KB, 250x238
>>682839904
>saying the same thing as toxic feminazis

Wow, you are one huge faggot eh!

How come the latest Star Wars trailer didn't get so many dislikes then? It had a female lead.
Just curious. What about this movie appeals to you the most? Is it the fact that you never saw the first one, or is it the scooby-doo ~2003 CGI? Or the shitty jokes?

Another reason people are upset, is because fans of the first 2 films have been asking for a sequel for years, and then Sony hijacked it and injected it with tryhard feminist girl powuh bullshit.


Please explain why this film deserves anything BUT the record for the most disliked trailer of all time.
>>
Almost a million dislikes on youtube. LoL
>>
As a white man I feel triggered by this movie. Where's my white male safe space?
>>
Why is the ape in it?
>>
>>682840688
Dás DÚBS!!!
>>
>>682840688
The same people who didn't like the female lead in star wars are disliking the new ghost busters. It just happens that the new ghost busters actually looks like a bad movie and is also getting unironic dislikes.
>>
>>682839273
as hyped as i was for hillary menstruating all over some important legislation back in 2008
>>
File: 614775315.jpg (129 KB, 600x839) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
614775315.jpg
129 KB, 600x839
>>682840923
>>
>>
>>682840979
Thanks for basically confirming my point.
Of course a portion of the dislikes are coming from people who actually do get butthurt over this shit, but they clearly don't make up a large part of the overall viewers, or else Star Wars would have flopped like Ghostbusters is/will.

Honestly, if they made the film well, and for the right reasons, a lot of people wouldn't give a shit. However, this film looks fucking atrocious.
>>
File: savage.jpg (31 KB, 799x179) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
savage.jpg
31 KB, 799x179
>>682839681

savage

its just getting worse
>>
>>682839273
This is now a ghostbusters reboot hate thread
>>
File: 1358473598803.jpg (81 KB, 259x383) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1358473598803.jpg
81 KB, 259x383
>>682841330
For fuck's sake I don't know why I typed like I'm from fucking reddit but yeah, kek
>>
File: 1462007658134.jpg (21 KB, 346x264) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1462007658134.jpg
21 KB, 346x264
>>682840979
Its a lazy gender swapped piece of copy pasta. Same beats as original movie do not make it creative. Library ghost, proton pack creation, omg hearse, fire house, etc.
>>
>>682840979
>>682841330
found the virgins
go get laid and then see your opinion change
>>
>>682839273
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
SELF PROMOTING
>SELF PROMOTING
>>
>>682841754
>somebody is going to see the movie because /b/ said it was shit
okay
>>
>>682839273
none
>>
I just can't wait for it to be great and shut up all you sexist naysayers.
>>
I'm going to download it and then delete it and download it and delete it over and over so they lose money.
>>
>>682841711
To be fair, I don't get laid nearly as often as I used to, if that counts.
Anyway, wtf does that have to do with mine and anon's post?

>3/10 made me reply
>>
File: 1455057142272.jpg (52 KB, 583x583) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1455057142272.jpg
52 KB, 583x583
It's gonna suck.

Women just aren't funny. In place of humor there will be shrieking, and that will ruin the action sequences.

It's gonna suck.
>>
>>682840688
>How come the latest Star Wars trailer didn't get so many dislikes then?
Because it is Star Wars you sheltered fuck.

>Another reason people are upset, is because fans of the first 2 films have been asking for a sequel for years, and then Sony hijacked it and injected it with tryhard feminist girl powuh bullshit.

I agree completely. I hate this stupid feminist movement we've had. It ruins so much and is often done just because "HUR DUR FEMALE LEAD." I tolerated it in Star Wars but do feel it wasn't better in any way. But SW was shit as a whole regardless. Too many plot holes, too many little details missed, strategy gone herp, etc. Can't wait to see how successful the next dump will be.
>>
>>682841711
Fucked over a handful
Think this movie looks like feminazi trash.
>>
>>682839273
yesterday it was on zero
today it raised to -1.
>>
>>682840075
Kristen Wiig and the blonde dyke are probably bigger feminazis than the fat one. At least she's married.
>>
>>682841833
You have to admit, /b/ posts these so timely and curiously void of info. This is text book advertising and I agree with anon. These appear way to often and are literally copy/pasted. How do you think 4chan stays in business?
>>
>>682839273
I recognise the fat pig-nose one but none of the others.
>>
>>682839273

Let's face the truth: Original Ghostbusters was a shitty movie saved by a superb cast.
It is nearly impossible to do a not horrible sequel or reboot or whatever.
>>
File: 1425834550687.png (168 KB, 400x300) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1425834550687.png
168 KB, 400x300
>>682842177
>Women just aren't funny
what's it like to always be wrong AND ugly?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfG30wN714Y
>>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing
>>
>>682841932
Women think it looks like shit too.

I've went to 4 movies with this trailer in the previews. Not once did anyone laugh, and at the end there's always a girl saying to her boyfriend "omg that looks terrible."
>>
>>682842569
You're right. Her obesity was hilarious.
>>
>>682842508
This
>>
Okay, a joke's a joke.

Now put away the three cunts and their coon pictures and show us who's actually starring in the remake.
>>
File: image.jpg (22 KB, 347x373) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
image.jpg
22 KB, 347x373
>>682842569
What's it like surfing the Internet for anything sexist so you can try your hardest to justify the 1st world oppression women face in America?
>>
I know you fags will disagree with me, but I actually think the four leads are funny. I like wiig and the fat one, and the dyke and chimp are pretty good on SNL (tho the big black lady only really plays loud black woman, but whatever, still funny to me).
It's really too fucking bad that this movie looks like hot garbage. I thought it sounded like a shit idea when i heard about it but wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt since the cast seemed ok, but holy shit what a bad fucking trailer.

It's basically a movie no one wanted made the way no one asked only to suit some weird agenda and that's faggoty as fuck, and I'm a huge progressive gaylord who is voting for dem.

No matter what tumblr thinks, the majority of the country are not SJW feminazis and just think this kind of shit is fucking annoying. They don't swing hard one way or the other, they just want to see a funny ghostbusters movie and this is going to tank horribly.
>>
>>682842181
Dunno, never saw the new star wars because I like torrenting films. But I am aware of Star Wars' fucking huge, sprawling fanbase. Surely that would make the latest film MORE susceptible to people bashing it for the female lead?
As I say, I haven't seen it yet, but I know it was very well-received from pretty much everyone I asked. Not one person complained about the main character. This is proof that people don't give a fuck about women in films as long as the film itself is at least half good. The new ghostbusters looks fucking shocking.
>>
>>682842569
So what is the funny part of the video you linked?
>>
>>682839273
No. Not at all. I might watch it when it is pirateable just so I can properly mock it. Otherwise I don't want to give any money to this """"""""""""""film.""""""""""""""""
>>
I'm gonna go see it and everytime Fat ass McCarthy makes a shitty joke that draws silence from theatre, I'm going to laugh as loud as I can until I get thrown out.
>>
>>682839273
>So how hype are we for Ghostbusters III?
Not at all. The fuck do we need another Ghostbusters movie for? I saw the original two in the theater as a kid. Not once did I think "man, I wish they'd make more Ghostbusters." I didn't even want the sequel.
>>
I loved the first 2 and used to watch the cartoon.
Not bothered at all by the full female cast. That fat chick is pretty funny in her movies so this might be ok to watch.
>>
>>682843459
There's actually a reason to see this now. Thanks anon
>>
>>682843741
Watch the trailer and tell me if one ounce of joy was had in your pathetic faggot body.
>>
>>682843867
Laughed more at this comment than I probably would at the movie.
>>
>>682839273
Nope. It shouldn't exist because it doesn't need a reboot, the series was perfect as it was. Boycott this shit, but if you really must have more GB then go play the game or watch the fanflick 'return of the ghostbusters' , it's actually pretty good.
>>
>>682841347
This is why we need feminism!
All these down votes just because they are women!
#smashthepatriarchy
>>
>>682842420
I can say with quite a high degree of certainty that if that were some kind of ulterior motive for this thread, it would fail so fucking badly. Let me explain:

/b/ is mostly made-up of computer savvy people who spend alot of time on the internet. If someone makes a thread to point out how badly something is bombing, the only thing that would happen is:

>10x more dislikes
>no extra ticket sales
>worse publicity

So yeah, even if that is the case (which it's not), it definitely won't do any good.
Just for that post, I'm gonna download it and watch it so I can honestly give it a negative review.
>>
>>682842569
Is this comedy?
>>
File: 45365463545324.jpg (811 KB, 1000x1333) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
45365463545324.jpg
811 KB, 1000x1333
>>682842569
Is this c..Comedy?
>>
File: +1.jpg (23 KB, 400x400) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
+1.jpg
23 KB, 400x400
>>682839273
further proof that women are inferior to men. they can't even come up with their own characters.
>>
>>682842420

Not one anon is going to pay to see this film they'll wait for it to come out on dvd and rip it like every other sane person should
>>
>>682843459
genius
>>
If you haven't disliked the trailer yet go do it. I want that thing at 1mil dislikes. Just for keks.
>>
>>682845772
too much effort
>>
>>682846138
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3ugHP-yZXw
>>
File: 1462315737490.jpg (442 KB, 717x880) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1462315737490.jpg
442 KB, 717x880
>>682841711
>>
just watched the full length trailer for the first time. Just wow.. I did not mind female leads as long as the movie actually doesn't seem to suck a huge donkey dick. Star wars was okay despite people complaining about the black guy and the female being in the lead but truth to be told I would have enjoyed the movie as much as them replaced. However after seeing this trailer I can't but think of how badly they fucked this one up.. just.. no please. Surely there are remakable movies with a full female cast instead of a male one than fucking ghostbusters.. what if they made a movie about feminist history and all the actors portraying females were male? kek
>>
>>682840688
I fucking hated that Star Wars Mary Sue bullshit. I mean really. A homeless orphan master mechanic 12 year old girl who becomes a Jedi Master just overnight? Fuck that.
>>
File: WiseCrab.jpg (365 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
WiseCrab.jpg
365 KB, 1024x768
>>682839861
This Anon knows the truth.
>>
Ugly, niggy, chubby, pretty. Cant coast off the success of the real ghostbusters with those odds
>>
>>682839861
>trying to prove women are as good as men
>not trying to prove women could be better
this proves women have no ambition and therefore are not equal to men
>>
>>682839861
>emulating their previous work instead of doing something original.
This is the premise of every reboot ever
>>
File: 1462158272081.jpg (38 KB, 413x395) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
1462158272081.jpg
38 KB, 413x395
>>682840197
>>
>>682842569
>1:07
>"Even when I was young, fit and slim..."

Best laugh I had all day Anon. Thanks.
>>
>>682846819
THIS
>>
>>682839273
>>
>>682846819
>"you just don't like that she's a strong female"
>>
File: ludnig.jpg (91 KB, 680x383) Image search: [iqdb] [SauceNao] [Google]
ludnig.jpg
91 KB, 680x383
>>682840432
that song is lit af fam
>>
>>682839273
Look, first of all women cannot be ghost busters it 's illegal
>>
Left to right
Dan Aykroyd
Ernie Hudson
Bill Murray
Harold Ramis
>>
>>682846819

that's pretty much how oppression works, fam.
>>
>>682842569
i don't get it
Thread replies: 99
Thread images: 22
Thread DB ID: 35267



Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [sexy] | 4Archive.org | [Home]

Navigation: /b/ - Random [Archive] | Search | [sexy] | 4Archive.org | [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.