How can you atheists believe the Big Bang "theory" made all this happen? There is no way our earth is 4.5 billion years old, and we evolved from monkeys. Evolution, or should I say "Evilution" is a lie made up by liberal school teachers trying to poison children.
>>682381981
right? Much more believable than the stroy where some imaginary frined who lives in the sky made everything with his magic even though he came from absolutely nowhere.
>>682381981
Shut the fuck up you faggot.
Real talk tho, doesn't the law of conservation of mass and energy, one of the key laws of science, dispute the Big Bang Theory with the sudden creation of mass and energy out of nothing?
>>682383743
wtf man
>>682381981
Fuck off, bit
>>682383965
What?
>>682383743
In what universe is a singularity nothing?
>>682381981
Does the bible ever contradict itself?
>>682381981
NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN
>>682381981
listen OP, i used to love the movie gremlins. its still ok but not the best movie I've ever seen. anyway. i met this girl who also loves the movie gremlins. she said that it reminds her of her childhood. and for some reason the mogwai really turn her on. i ask how thats possible. the mogwai have absolutely no sexual features. no rounded ass, no raised breasts, no genetalia of any type. could it possibly be the fact that they transform into those slimy green gremlins? what is it? she refused tell me. i spent many nights afterwards watching gremlins and hoping maybe to get turned on a little bit. one night i got half a chub but I've since realized that was most likely just the air conditioner. eventually i couldnt take the mystery anymore. i MUST know what turns her on about the movie gremlins, if for no other reason than i want to be able to fuck a mogwai in the comfort of my own home. why should she be able to get so turned on by gremlins but I'm not even allowed to experience it? i corner her. she backs up. scared. my slow approach has her shaking and asking, "logan, whats gotten into u?" i tell her this is the end of the line. she must tell me why gremlins makes her pussy drip. here and now is the time or she will die by my average sized cock. I can tell that she's finally about to tell me, she's finally about to break. she takes a deep breath and dramatic music begins to play from the lunch room loud speakers across from mrs. shabotski's 5th grade class ( this was the song: http://youtu.be/dPiEVyd3-4k [Open] ) above the dulcid tones she tells me the thing i swore never to repeat. but i will tell it to you hear bros. i will tell it to you from my death bed. i will tell you the sexiest thing I've ever heard. that girl lets the real life gizmo live in her pussy. shit gets wild after midnight
>>682381981
>>682381981
YOU SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH!!!
>>682384780
thats a nice image. Can I borrow it?
>>682381981
>>682384344
I mean that part of the theory is heavily disputed, and honestly it's either: everything was packed into a single small point with a high density and just decided to explode or there was nothing at all. While I don't believe in both, I think that there being nothing is more likely than having mass be packed so densely and expanding for random quantum fluctuations.
>>682384971
>>682385349
>>682381981
Homo says what..?
>>682385449
>>682385267
We don't know what happened at the beginning, you shithead.
>>682385705
>>682381981
>>682385973
>>682385843
What the fuck, then. Why do people trust science so much, when they are just as clueless to the origin of te universe as anybody else. Religion seems like a safe way to go, in that case.
>>682386127
>>682381981
>>682386474
>>682381981
Says the moron who doesn't back up their statements with facts.
>>682386266
Because science continues to make an effort to explain things correctly and fits a conclusion to the physical evidence. Religion does things in exactly the opposite order.
>>682381981
>>682386266
We are uncertain, these kinds of theories make more sense than the theory of a higher power being up there to some. Everything could be wrong. We might even be in the matrix. The Big Bang theory is not about a big explosion but about extremely fast expansion of the observable universe.
░██████╗░███████╗████████╗░░░██████╗░███████╗███████╗░░░░░██╗██╗░░░░░░░░░██
██╔════╝░██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝░░██╔═══██╗██╔════╝██╔════╝░░░░██╔╝██║░░░░░░░░██
██║░░███╗█████╗░░░░░██║░░░░░██║░░░██║█████╗░░█████╗░░░░░██╔╝░██████╗░░░██
██║░░░██║██╔══╝░░░░░██║░░░░░██║░░░██║██╔══╝░░██╔══╝░░░░██╔╝░░██╔══██╗░██
╚██████╔╝███████╗░░░██║░░░░░╚██████╔╝██║░░░░░██║░░░░░░██╔╝░░░██████╔╝██
░╚═════╝░╚══════╝░░░╚═╝░░░░░░╚═════╝░╚═╝░░░░░╚═╝
███████╗░█████╗░░██████╗░░██████╗░░██████╗░████████
██╔════╝██╔══██╗██╔════╝░██╔════╝░██╔═══██╗╚══██
█████╗░░███████║██║░░███╗██║░░███╗██║░░░██║░░░██
██╔══╝░░██╔══██║██║░░░██║██║░░░██║██║░░░██║░░░██
>>682387202
I also find this to be true but you're neglecting the fact that what we perceive as reality may differ.
>>682381981
lol go back to fucking your sister inbred southfag
>>682383743
there was no creation, the universe has always been and was compressed before the big bang.
go read the wikipedia article on big bang.
>>682387202
Still, science is met with deafening walls in a lot of the occasions that deal with things like this. And if science can't explain it, it's sweeped under the rug and ignored, then they chastise the church for their claims and explanations when they can't even offer a claim to begin with.
>>682385267
>I think that there being nothing is more likely
Some people honestly believe there was nothing that suddenly blew up into the entire universe? It's honestly ridiculous when you sit down and think about it rationally.
>>682387906
I don't know man. I just see a higher being as more probable than everything happening on accident. And I'm a really logical thinker, versed in and a strong supporter of science, but the more I see how everything in science fits together, the more I think that it can't just be a coincidence.
>>682381981
>Evilution
kek good one mom
>>682385603
What?
L M A O WAIT WOOPS ! XDDDDDD
I don't know if I believe in God, but I think he must hate me, because he allowed you to create a dog that constantly rapes me!
>>682384969
take it it's all yours my friend
░██████╗░███████╗████████╗░░░██████╗░███████╗███████╗░░░░░██╗██╗░░░░░░░░░██
██╔════╝░██╔════╝╚══██╔══╝░░██╔═══██╗██╔════╝██╔════╝░░░░██╔╝██║░░░░░░░░██
██║░░███╗█████╗░░░░░██║░░░░░██║░░░██║█████╗░░█████╗░░░░░██╔╝░██████╗░░░██
██║░░░██║██╔══╝░░░░░██║░░░░░██║░░░██║██╔══╝░░██╔══╝░░░░██╔╝░░██╔══██╗░██
╚██████╔╝███████╗░░░██║░░░░░╚██████╔╝██║░░░░░██║░░░░░░██╔╝░░░██████╔╝██
░╚═════╝░╚══════╝░░░╚═╝░░░░░░╚═════╝░╚═╝░░░░░╚═╝
███████╗░█████╗░░██████╗░░██████╗░░██████╗░████████
██╔════╝██╔══██╗██╔════╝░██╔════╝░██╔═══██╗╚══██
█████╗░░███████║██║░░███╗██║░░███╗██║░░░██║░░░██
██╔══╝░░██╔══██║██║░░░██║██║░░░██║██║░░░██║░░░██
>>682384427
http://infidels.org/library/modern/jim_meritt/bible-contradictions.html
>>682381981
JFC the troll is strong with this one.
>>682382575
Dude it comes from a book literally written from the imaginary friend. That's all the proof I need! I mean... It wasn't written by him.... But several other people all spread around the middle east all recounting hearsay hundreds of years apart... And not in English mind you, but despite all that and the 100% chance NO ONE lied or stretched the truth how can you deny it. Check mate
>>682389129
That's scientifically and mathematically impossible, everything has a beginning. The universe can't just have always been, it had to have started at some point.
FUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY ASSFUCK MY ASS FUCK MY
>>682385603
I'm sorry I didn't hear you. You said a homo says...?
>>682389405
Read on dumbass, it's a theory that I don't believe, it's just the more probable out of the 2z
>>682381981
EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT EVOLVE FAGGOT
>>682389405
Especially since the universe is made of matter.
NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER NIGGER
>>682386266
>trust science
You do not understand what science is. You do not "trust" science. Science is simply a means to observe the world and learn from the observations. I do however trust the evidence, but not necessarily the analysis. Evidence is leaves nothing to opinion. Simple data, that is all we want from creationists.
>>682390277
>>682382575
>>682384149
>>682384427
>>682386659
>>682388585
>>682389556
>2016
>You euphoric scraggly cringepots still fall for this b8
>>682389461
It is.
>>682389461
I don't feel the same way, why do you have doubts? Please clarify.
>>682390547
Damn what a strong argument, you changed my mind. Give yourself a pat on the back then fuck off.
>>682388234
>what we perceive as reality may differ.
This is why anecdotes and eye witness accounts are bullshit. Science uses measurements and repeated experimentation. In fact if the data differs from each set up the experiment can not be used as evidence.
>>682390809
>then fuck off.
Good one
>>682389941
>The universe can't just have always been, it had to have started at some point.
Why? How do you know this with such certainty?
>>682390533
>understands the definition of bait
>reads the bible
>believes it before any other religious literature
>Baited...
>>682390809
>>682391086
samefag.
>>682390731
Literally everything. From our solar system position allowing optimal habitability of our planet to human origin. Prokaryotic cells becoming more complex and turning into eukaryotic cells, something that has only ever happened once in the universe'a estimated 4 billion years. It just seems that along the way, one of these optimal conditions shouldn't have been met according to probability, but somehow they all fell into place? It seems more likely that there was an omniscient hand guiding the way.
>>682389153
>And if science can't explain it, it's sweeped under the rug and ignored
No actually it is further investigated and experimented on until it can be explained. Religion however does just what you are saying and if the bible can't explain it then they ignore it or twist the "infallible word of god" to mean something new.
>>682391159
Suck my cock faggot
>>682390809
Out of the trillions upon trillions of possible outcomes, you being here, jacking off to /b/ is a completely random and accidental event. If the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs missed, you would not be here. You're not special, gods aren't real, and there is no greater meaning behind any of this.
>>682391584
>>682391159
if you want individuality, go to /pol/ faggets
>>682390101
>it's a theory that I don't believe, it's just the more probable out of the 2z
if it's the more probable one then why wouldn't you believe it?
>>682381981
Interestingly enough, geologists and astronomers disagreed on the age of the earth until radiation's discovery in the 20th century.
Prior to this time, geologists had a figure very close to the generally accepted one today, but the best theories of astronomy put the earth orders of magnitudes younger than geologists' estimates. The discovery of radioactive materials in the earth's crust reconciles the two figures by providing a lasting source of energy to maintain the planet's internal temperature.
I'm something of a scholar in the fields of biology/evolution as well as planetary formation, so please feel free to ask if you're confused. I'm very informed.
You're probably trolling, but many here might believe it given the perversion of /pol/ spreading across the boards.
>>682389461
>just be a coincidence.
It's not it's the natural order that has formed because it was the easier way, no deity necessary.
>>682391128
Here: http://m.phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html
This supports your idea, but like it says I'm the article, just to fathom the idea that the universe technically never started, scientists had to consider and make up a new gravity particle. When push comes to shove, scientists just make up a new theory to explain a current one, it's an endless loop.
But nothing else in the world is known to have no start, why would the universe be any different.
>>682390533
meh still more fun than posting about how someone is falling for some troll
>>682381981
I actually laughed this time. I lost it when he said "evilution".
>>682392328
what is OP's determined halflife
because half of /b/ is tired of his shit.
I find it really helpful that this tard uses the same image randomcunt.jpg for every religious debate thread so I know to scroll passed without reading a word.
>>682391565
No it's not. As I mentioned earlier, science does answer questions but only with more questions. They literally use theories to justify other theories. That's no better than what religious people do.
>>682392465
>nothing else in the world is known to have no start, why would the universe be any different.
Aren't you the same anon that was talking about the conservation of energy and matter? technically nothing ever has a start or finish. Everything is just changing form and always has been, yes even before the big bang.
>mfw this sort of thread still get this many replies
>>682389941
>everything has a beginning
In terms of how we experience reality on a human perspective? Of course. In terms of how everything ever functions? Likely no. That's a pretty big claim, bub.
Even if nothing existed before the big bang, we know that it was about 11 billion years ago. Well, among others, Einstein was a believer in the idea that the universe will continually grow and shrink, and that the big bang is simply the result of too much mass in one place, suddenly exploding outwards. Until the process repeats.
>>682391143
I never implied anything about my own religion or lack of.
No matter the beliefs though, you're still a dipshit.
>>682393093
Yes I am. And actually you are right about that, I hadn't given that much thought. Still, It seems incomprehensible for something not to have a beginning.
>>682381981
Is that picture from a movie or some shit? Sauce on the pic pls.
>>682381981
>>682391360
>something that has only ever happened once in the universe'a estimated 4 billion years
How do you know this is the only planet or time lfe has evolved to it's current state?
with how large the universe is and how long the universe has been stable what are the actual chances that life would not evolve? If you think the conditions are too specific to have just happened somewhere at sometime in the universe then you do not understand the scale that the universe is. You are only think from the perspective of you (optimally) 100 year life on one planet. over billions of years and trillions of galaxies these conditions had to happen by chance at some point.
>>682383743
Yeah but even scientific laws can be proven wrong. The difference between a hypothesis, theory, and law is how much scrutiny it has gone under. The recent discovery of gravity waves might help solve that conundrum.
Buuuuuuut I'm in the side of who fucking cares. Knowing the truth of the creation of the universe isn't something I can make money off of or fap to so I personally don't care.
>>682393008
>As I mentioned earlier, science does answer questions but only with more questions. They literally use theories to justify other theories.
I'm not sure what you are refering to. which post? Did you cite examples of this? All scientific theories are based off of real data.
>>682393746
Well, I feel that if some sort of life had evolved to or past our point, we would have found it or it found us by now. In some way we would know, I'd think. But you're right about the universe being big and all, perhaps another place where all conditions were met is just too far away.
>>682394018
Actually an article that I posted above has an example of this with the new gravity particle.
>>682393412
>I hadn't given that much thought. Still, It seems incomprehensible for something not to have a beginning.
Yeah everything is incomprehensible until you think about it. Don't be a sheeple and just repeat stuff you've heard think for yourself.
>>682381981
You didn't actually lower the plausibility of the theory of evolution.
Why is it impossible for the world to be 4.5 billion years old, or for humans to have evolved from "monkeys".
>I think that it's ridiculous for the world to be really old, or for humans to be evolved from monkeys.
>therefore, bearded space wizard and seven days of just fucking around.
Alright fags, I'm done for the night. Fuck it, I developed my thoughts a little, I'm just tired of fucking typing and I've got homework to do, so thanks for the debate.
>>682394115
You're mistaken. Our universe is teeming with civilizations, most of them probably less developed than ours, and most of them probably dead. There could be literal trillions of planets out there almost exactly like earth, down to their technologies, and we'd have no way to know in the short time we've been here.
>>682394294
and that post would be number....
>>682394435
I'm not a sheeple or whatever at all, in fact you could do with some original thought yourself. I've spent quite a bit of time thinking about this without consulting much of anything except some articles. I still don't agree with you, but you gave me something to ponder so whatever
>>682394720
God damn man look for it next time. It's this one...
>>682392465
>>682394115
>Well, I feel
yeah that's terrible evidence for anything...
and you rebutted yourself in that post so I will just say that yes you are absolutely on to what I was suggesting in that the conditions for evolved life are so rare that they would (statistically) occur so far apart that it may be impossible for us to ever reach alien life during this universes life cycle.
"Big" is such a weak word to describe the size and age of the universe but all english words seem to fail in that regard so why not use big.
>>682395194
You're analysis of my simple grammatical choices doesn't help your case either. I wasn't even making a claim in that post, I literally just wanted to give my opinion in that one, that's why I prefaced it with "I feel"
>>682394874
Good man, and I love getting original thoughts and could definitely use more. I didn't mean to put you down at all just speaking my mind /b/ro.
>>682395166
ah yes I see. They aren't making up a new theory and using the old theory to explain it, they have collected new data and have made a new theory to explain the data. That shit is in the article bud.
>>682395738
I respect that, I was just trying to do the same sorry for lashing out.
>>682395610
Yeah but you said in your other post
>>682389461
>I just see a higher being as more probable than everything happening on accident. And I'm a really logical thinker, versed in and a strong supporter of science, but the more I see how everything in science fits together, the more I think that it can't just be a coincidence.
The "evidence" you gave was
>>682391360
>From our solar system position allowing optimal habitability of our planet to human origin. Prokaryotic cells becoming more complex and turning into eukaryotic cells, something that has only ever happened once in the universe'a estimated 4 billion years. It just seems that along the way, one of these optimal conditions shouldn't have been met according to probability, but somehow they all fell into place
This is all based on your feelings man... Your whole ideology expressed here is simply based off the fact that you feel it would be really hard for this to happen without a deity.
Just a trigger thread for fucking newfags. Kys OP
>>682396524
No worries. I think sometimes that if people weren't told they would end up in pure agony for all of eternity for getting this "wrong" then it would be a lot easier to have rational conversations about it, but I digress. I do understand and respect the weight of that though.
>>682396804
What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo.
>>682396695
Not really, on that second paragraph, the things I referenced,( not evidence, don't quote evidence, i never said they were formal evidence) were all facts, things that point to coincidence but more likely, higher intervention.
>>682397137
Yeah man just don't go anywhere near Baptists. Pretty much everyone is else is chill though. They all agree that if you haven't found God, it's because he hasn't willed you to, and he's all forgiving so you're mistake of not finding Him in time can be forgiven if you truly come to regret it.
>>682381981
The BBT breaks several scientific laws.
Any real scientist or astrophysicist knows it didn't happen that way.
Stay mad kiddies, maybe you should go to school or do some independent research before you think you know what you are talking about, or blindly believe something someone says, instead of being NEETs fapping to anime and cursing God because you are too lazy to get off your fat asses and better yourselves and your lives.
>>682397494
>things that point to coincidence but more likely, higher intervention.
naw man that's my point right there. True evidence doesn't "point" to anything it just is and that is the end of it. Scientists don't collect data and then say "well there probably is some more data that would say this." They just go off of what they have collected. You literally say in that second paragraph "it just seems that..." this is literally you just injecting your opinion, that is wholly unscientific.
>>682397925
>if you truly come to regret it
well if what I hear about hell is right then I'm sure I will.
>>682398064
>BBT breaks several scientific laws.
[citation needed]
>>682397925
Thanks man. good talking to you /b/ro im going to taco bell now though peace and love.
>>682398428
Actually, evidence does point to something. That's literally what it is, it points toward a heavy possibility. It's not how you say ,"it just is". Take for example a criminal investigation. Evidence will be stacked upon a person, that doesn't mean he did anything, there will always be anomalies, that's why evidence just POINTS to him, doesn't immediately mean it's him as you seem to believe. I'm not injecting my opinion, I'm trying to say that evidence is stacked on my claim, but I'm trying to give you the liberty that I might be incorrect. However, you seem to be keen at destroying that courtesy by pointing out simple mistakes in my wording and claiming that these error disassemble my claims completely. You are the one who seems wholly unscientific.
>>682399485
Peace man, I'll pray for your asshole
>>682398874
The cosmological principle i.e. uniform distribution of matter, we have clusters of stars in various places.
"We're lost... the foundations of the Big Bang models would crumble away. We'd be left with no explanation for the big bang, galaxy formation, or distribution of galaxies in the Universe." (Wertheim. M. God of the Question Vacuum. New Scientist 156 (2102) August 21, 1999 pp 23-26)
It also violates the law of conservation of perpetual motion, we have galaxies, planets, and moons, that spin in the opposite direction of others, if the original "dot" which was gathered at some infinitesimal point, was spinning, (which they say it was) everything would be spinning in the same direction. But it doesn't happen.
>>682399791
Just his asshole? What if his asshole goes to heave but the rest goes to hell? That will be real awkward for St. Peter.
>>682399648
>there will always be anomalies
Not with scientific evidence no, in fact there can't be. If the experiment can not be repeated with the same results it is invalid.
>I might be incorrect. However, you seem to be keen at destroying that courtesy by pointing out simple mistakes
If you are making mistakes then yes you are incorrect
what am I wrong about and / or being unscientific about?
>>682381981
Not a day goes by when one of these threads doesn't get posted. OP is literally the most dedicated troll in the history of 4chan. Everyone bow before your new king.
We were genetically modified in a lab, splice with monkeys and alien dna.
>>682401812
Maybe you should have actually read is post.
>>682381981
ego waffles
>>682400985
>we have clusters of stars in various places
Can't gravity explain this? Wouldn't that force pull matter into increasingly larger clusters until it creates one clump of matter that would continue to compress into a singularity and then idk bang?
>August 21, 1999
That quotes so good the first time I heard it I fell off my dinosaur.
>the law of conservation of perpetual motion
god I hope you mean the law of conservation of momentum
>we have galaxies, planets, and moons, that spin in the opposite direction of others, if the original "dot" which was gathered at some infinitesimal point, was spinning, (which they say it was) everything would be spinning in the same direction
On a universal scale there is not a single direction of rotation, within the system however you may find free particles with different rotations.
>>682402039
You know he doesn't even stick around in these threads, right? I participate all the time and he always leaves. I have know idea what his motivations are.
>>682381981
Anonymous HOW IS IT POSSIBLE HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP / HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP / HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP (Mon) HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP : HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP : HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW IS IT POSSIBLE No. HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP ▶
>> HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW IS IT POSSIBLE >> HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW IS IT POSSIBLE >> HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP HOW CAN YOU BE SUCH A FAGGOT OP POSSIBLE I HOW IS IT POSSIBLE say HOW IS IT POSSIBLE "Evilution" HOW IS IT POSSIBLE is HOW IS IT POSSIBLE a HOW IS IT POSSIBLE lie HOW IS IT POSSIBLE made HOW IS IT POSSIBLE up HOW IS IT POSSIBLE by HOW IS IT POSSIBLE liberal HOW IS IT POSSIBLE school HOW IS IT POSSIBLE teachers HOW IS IT POSSIBLE trying HOW IS IT POSSIBLE to HOW IS IT POSSIBLE poison HOW IS IT POSSIBLE children.
HOW IS IT POSSIBLE
>>682401812
Yes there is, many things have been corrected over time because of mistakes that were made from evidence that falsely pointed to something. Take chemistry for example, there are multiple transition metals that may behave like others and presumably carry the same electrons, this evidence would point that these elements should be categorized together, but at closer inspection, one can see differences that will cause it to be known as a different category or transition metal.
>>682403686
Nope.
In that case, the BBT is even more outdated, so you should just trash it too.
Yes.
On a universal scale there are only two directions of rotation, clockwise and counter clockwise. Made me kek though so thanks for the giggles.
>>682402747
I did and responded. ShitI even quoted him.
>>682401812
You are being unscientific in that you keep pointing out the most ridiculous flaws in my statement, not my logic or knowledge, just in wording and such, and consider it to be an indicator in the validity of my point. Your main argument seems to be that I'm wrong just because I keep being unscientific and you repeat that like a child in every rebuttal.
>>682404071
>mistakes that were made from evidence that falsely pointed to something
Yeah that's why you just take the evidence as what it is and don't point it anywhere.
>>682404088
>On a universal scale there are only two directions of rotation, clockwise and counter clockwise
Nope.
>>682404442
What exactly is your point?
>>682405828
The only thing need to defeat an assertion is an equal opposite assertion, yes.
And really, yes, there are only two directions of rotation, I'm sorry you haven't learned that yet.