This is what it would look like if men in ads were portrayed the same way as women.
>>676010071
That's not how it works, go back to tumblr
I don't trust any meat product under 99 cents, that burrito has to be at least 50% dog
>>676010195
The entire point is to change the way things currently work. And fuck you I grew up on /b/
>>676010071
no, that would be what gay men would make as an add
Actually the guys would be more muscular
More like literally searching male ads
>>676010358
Stop being such a faggot, OP. Fuck off back to tumblr.
>>676010358
>change the way things currently work
If it works, then why fix it? Plus I haven't seen an ad with a woman in it where they're essentially in a porn with the product crudely photoshopped in.
>>676010394
There are many instances of companies targeting ads toward a specific minority.
>>676010071
no, that's what it would look like if homosexuals were more than 2% of the population.
You're freaks and you are not normal.
>>676010071
>>676010071
maybe if that was a taco instead of a burrito I could see it happening. What would the appeal to women be of a man eating a burrito? They would want a man eating their taco.
great thread faggot
>>676010481
I see a bunch of men being portrayed as strong, in charge and being adored by women, as they should be. The only problem is that women aren't portrayed the same.
>>676011618
Because the women are adoring the strong men, as they should be
>>676010071
sure. but why is that a bad thing?
there's nothing wrong with portraying men in ways that implies they're sucking dick. it never happens though, because the whole point of marketing is to sell a product. assuming 10% of men are gay and 90% are straight, it makes more sense to portray women in such poses than men.
>>676010071
>>676011787
It isn't a bad thing. The problem is you've been taught to think its a bad thing and the image of a man even looking like he's sucking a dick makes people uncomforable
>>676012080
Well, you see, that doesn't apply here because those men are actually sucking dicks. Marketing works by majority, and guess what, a majority of people aren't homosexual men.
>>676012080
>It isn't a bad thing.
then what's your point faggot? why have you made this thread? are you OK with women being portrayed in those poses or not?
>The problem is you've been taught to think its a bad thing
i don't think it's a bad thing. i don't see a problem with companies using images like that to sell a product (i don't think it would work very well though).
>the image of a man even looking like he's sucking a dick makes people uncomforable
that's due to people generally being uncomfortable with homosexuality. we should all really just learn to ignore it though... it's not like homosexuality is ever forced on to anyone.
>>676011618
That's because men and women are attracted to different things, you fucking dolt. If men were attracted to the same things as women, we'd all like big, hairy, mongoloid women. If women were attracted to the same things as women, they'd all like fucking traps.
Humans are sexually dimorphic, deal with it.
>>676010358
glad you have been here for 1 year you faggot.
>>676012312
>Marketing works by majority
Actually, marketing works according to your target audience.
>>676012578
this.
any feminist who thinks there is no real difference between sexual attraction in men and woman is a woman who is completely unfamiliar with the real nature of sexual attraction in men, and the near-ubiquitous foot and trap fetishes in men which are almost completely absent in women.
>>676010358
>>676010071
kek this is not starbucks coffee dude, not everyone is gay (just as reminder)
>>676012744
A majority of your target audience. Let's say your target audience is Guys age 16-25. Now let's assume 5% is homosexual 5% is bi and 90% is straight. You want to make the most of your advertising and get the most. You would advertise to the straight guys.
>>676010195
>>676012372
I'm sure gay rape happens faggot
>>676013686
homosexuality is never legally forced onto anyone.
>>676012578
>>676012802
Now you're arguing against your own strawman. No one's contesting how your sexuality works. We're talking about treating women as people in ads.
>>676013072
and if your target audience is OP, then you use the image OP uploaded, because OP is a faggot.
>>676014024
they are being treated as people, you fucking SJW idiot.
men give oral sex.
women give oral sex.
people give oral sex.
if we established a rule to say that it should never be implied that women are giving oral sex in adverts, then THAT wouldn't be treating women as people.
>>676013781
but if the guy is strong he can fuck the little, no?
>>676014024
Everyone is objectified, get over it or go take this to your college safe space where all your women's studies friends will agree with you.
>>676014024
Haha what? Sexualizing someone now means they aren't people? This is definitely bait
>>676014578
yeah, people aren't supposed to be sexual. people are supposed to be completely sexless, and reproduce by asexual means. didn't you know this?
i learned this in my woman's studies class.
>>676010071
im ok with that
>>676014188
The reality of the situation is regardless of who the company making the ad is targeting, the ad is going to be seen by everyone. When nearly every ad uses the same universal tactic of portraying women in terms of mens' sexuality it becomes really annoying.
Notice the key difference is not simply that sexual ads exist, its the frequency. It's that the primary way women are portrayed are these types of ads. It's simple, cheap, and universally effective among men. Among women, it's universally annoying and that's why we annoy you by stating our opinions so often.
>>676014870
Ah, yes! How cisgendered of me. I sincerely apologize, and will be contacting gookmoot to edit my post to include a trigger warning.
>>676014578
>>676014870
That's also a strawman, sexuality exists and it is good.
>>676010071
So? We live in the future. Why would you care about gay stuff?
>>676015419
C U R R E N T Y E A R
>>676011618
>>676015154
>It's simple, cheap, and universally effective among men
You cracked the code. That's why companies that have men as the target audience use it so frequently.
>>676015348
Then why did you say "We're talking about treating women as people in ads." if you were not asserting that the sexualizing of women in advertisements did not imply a dehumanizing aspect?
Either explain yourself and I'll apologize for being wrong or you've quite literally just cornered yourself in not only an absurdly idiotic premise, but also a defensively pathetic strawman accusation matched with a blatant lie.
>>676011618
Have you not seen the cuckmercials on tv?
As a trans girl I find media "women are sex objects" shit really upsetting but then I realize I don't have to buy or watch anything they sell so fuck it.
>>676015154
>When nearly every ad uses the same universal tactic of portraying women in terms of mens' sexuality it becomes really annoying.
there are also adverts that target women's sexuality. but as we already established, women are not sexually aroused by watching men giving blowjobs. that's why you don't see adverts like the one you originally posted.
however, just because you think an advert is "annoying", doesn't mean that advert shouldn't exist. nor does it mean that the company shouldn't be allowed to use that tactic of appealing to men's sexuality. nor does it mean we should introduce a rule of having adverts which feature men licking burritos for the sake of gender balance.
so really, is that what your whole point is? "i don't like these adverts because they're annoying." whoopdee fucking doo. there are adverts that annoy me too. get over it, faggot.
>It's simple, cheap, and universally effective among men.
yes, it's effective among men.
the whole point of advertising is to get people to buy the product.
well done faggot! you know have an enhanced understanding of market economics. now you can get out of your safe space and take the economics class at university instead.
>>676014024
Everyone is literally a sex object you dipshit. We live to fuck and we fuck to make lives.
>>676015348
If you're ok with sexually then why do you want to repress it so much?
>>676015883
>As a trans girl
You do realize you wanted to become a woman because of the hyper-feminine image of them you were fed as a child, right?
You don't buy the products, but you bought the image. Hell, you became it. Congrats.
>>676015734
See my post here. I'm commenting on the effect of advertising in general.
>>676015154
>>676010071
Gay porn in ads? I've actually never seen that, I rarely see lesbo porn in ads but then again, they allowed themselves to be portrayed in such a manner. So get fucked sjw pussy.
>>676015883
Why do you think that because women get advertised as overtly sexual beings that it means men think that's all they are? If anything, it's a blatant call to how men love women and wish they were even more sexually active.
The advertisers are creating and then selling a utopian image, because that's what you do when you sell someone something. How is the portrayal of something in a way that makes men enjoy you even more spun into a negative thing? I literally don't even get this subject.
>>676016299
that's a little much on the armchair psychologist front, and im even with you.
>>676016396
All hail the king of b8
>>676016299
>You do realize you wanted to become a woman because of the hyper-feminine image of them you were fed as a child, right?
maybe... but screw it, I am already transitioned.
Besides going on 4chan I don't use or see any media so I don't get bombarded by ads like normie sheeple.
>>676010676
>men
>minority
Pick one
Go back to tumblr normie
>>676015883
You're right, if it were an isolated thing no one would or should give a damn. But it isn't and we all feel the same way. It's not going to change unless we speak our minds
>>676016619
>sheeple
Kys and do the world a solid.
>>676016439
Well dude, if you ran on estrogen like me and girls do you would know sex and sex drive takes on a whole new meaning. It takes an act of god to get horny as a girl.
>>676016697
they were discussing gay men.
gay men are a minority...
>>676010301
Actually, it's 60% silicon.
Taco Bell has been lobbying Congress for years to allow them to lower the meat content to just 20%. Apparently, they haven't managed to toss enough money at Congress to make it worthwhile.
>>676011193
Funny thing is, except for hulk, that was the position they were already in, just flipped around
>>676016619
I'd fuck you if you called me daddy
>>676016845
Tell that to my gf, she's always wanting.
>>676016832
What? Sheeple are bad for the world. All you jerks do is consume and sit around.
>>676016845
Or maybe you can't get horny because you're a monstrosity
>>676016697
Right, because all men are gay...
>>676016619
It's awesome that you were able transition and live how you want to though. I'll give you that.
>>676011193
Look at any Spider-Man, deadpool, or nightwing merchandise cover. There are plenty of guy asses on covers, get over it.
>>676017065
Nope, its all about hormones. Men don't get that women don't really give a shit about getting off all the time.
>>676017152
Yeah thanks it was hard af but now life is magical.
>>676017025
kek, that's just what you think
>>676016978
sorry already married
>>676014024
just out of curiosity, what do you think the point of an ad is?
>>676017469
I'll anally rape your husband and make him call me daddy
>>676017740
actually I have a wife lol
>>676017983
I'll skullfuck her eye sockets with my 42 inch monster cock
>>676017469
You realize sex drive differs from person to person? So there can be women who are horny a lot and men who aren't and vice versa.
>>676017983
>i have a wife
oh so you're only barely passable as a bulldyke?
>>676018390
No, I am fully transitioned as in post operative. Heck I am more feminine than my wife and she usually tops me with one of our double enders.
>>676018210
In my experience with women and being one getting horny takes an act of god and is very fragile and sporadic.
>>676015983
The difference is the ads that annoy you aren't the same ads that annoy most men. I wouldn't even mention it if it were just me, but it isn't.
The entire point of bringing it up is to as a collective say "We don't like your ads. Come up with something new or, at least more tactful or we will use our purchasing power elsewhere."
>>676016619
>I am already transitioned
living the lie
>>676018749
>I'm not actually a woman but in my experience of pretending to be one
>>676018907
The thing is, only women get but hurt over ads cause they're coddled their whole lives. I wouldn't give a shit if they showed a guy sucking Greek yogurt off a cock for an ad because I'm not a fucking baby. Grow up you waste of human flesh.
>>676019274
Said the guy getting bent out of shape over a simple conversation. I rest my case, faggot.
>>676010071
oh, now i am gay for big beefy burritos
>>676019776
I wasn't even the original guy fuckin retard. It pisses me off how childish today's women are. If something makes you uncomfortable just move the fuck on.
>>676011193
To be fair, a lot of women seem to prefer the ab shot over the ass shot on male characters, which is why they are all, you know... Pulled back showing off their bulging muscles. Which girls are supposed to love.
>>676020223
Except for the fact that comic characters have up until recently always been targeted toward boys/men. I think it's safe to say that sexuality wasn't the deciding factor when drawing male characters...unless the gays have been tricking you this whole time. lol
