So... uh, there was a horse thread here a minute ago, but it 404'd as soon as I clicked on it.
Can we get moar?
MODS MODS MODS
>>674783612
Nope
>>674783612
Id say yes, but the mods are probably going to delete it again
>>674783745
NEWfag NEWfag NEWfag
No, beastiality is disgusting.
>>674784128
lurk moar fagget
what? I missed the hoarse thread?
>>674784195
Normie
>>674784201
>implying that this isn't an old fag who's come full circle and acts like a flaming newfag just to troll mid-fags
>>674784195
There is far more disgusting shit on this website, dont be a fucking pussy you faggot
>>674784195
fuck off
>>674783612
that shoop is so fake it hurts
>>674784060
Why would they delete it? It doesn't go against the rules. The images are legal, and /b/ pretty much has no other rules.
>>674783612
If you look closely below the horse cock, you'll see it's a fotoshop. but you problably how that already.
>>674784539
Beastiality is actually not legal everywhere, so it actually is againat the rules
>>674784539
I got banned for posting a gif of a horse cumming in some sluts mouth.
>>674784791
so is loli
More pics of that chick?
>>674784791
females on internet are also not legeal everywhere and yet sometimes they post here
>>674784791
texas
>>674784836
>>674784836
i am pretty sure it was fake
>>674784604
>>674784511
No shit sherlock, but it was the only one I grabbed from the main page.
>>674784791
The internet is not legal in North Korea, let's shut this site down
>>674784791
Bestiality images are legal, the act itself isn't.
>>674784918
Good argument, say that to the admins
>>674783612
moar
>>674784975
I'm pretty sure it fucking wasn't
>>674785026
this
>>674785026
lets shut down the internet
>>674785161
Was the female fat and ugly?
>>674785017
What is it about this stuff that turns you on anyways?
>>674784791
that's not how the rule works, they have to violate something like the 18 U.S.C. ยง 2252(B)(b) act, which loli nor beastiality violates
I don't want to get banned for badmouthing the mods because they're doing whats in the best interest of the site, but beastiality is no more legal than gore
So... anyone going to post pics?
>>674785502
> is no more illegal than gore
FTFY
>>674785423
Big penis, big load when it cums, its just better then normal penis
>>674785701
Also nasty sluts being fucking nasty
>>674783612
Nobody has moar
That's why these die
>>674784854
Kek I love how some people will argue that loli isn't actually cp. I remember i saw a person on Facebook asked what loli was and some dude was telling them that it's grown women that look really young.
>no dude you stroke it to children
I wish I screen capped it.
Someone. Post. Pictures.
>>674785701
btw. ever heared of Mr. hands? the guy that got tourn up inside from a horse cock? I bet this was the best-final fuck in his life
>>674785984
Then can we at least get what was in the first thread?
>>674786168
Brutal
>>674786168
Jeah, rip mr hands.
Shouldve been more carefull
>>674785986
>that loli isn't actually cp
it's not in the sense that children aren't being violated for it's production. people jerk off to futari, doesn't mean they're into trannies. people who dress and grind as furries doesn't mean they're into beastiality
some people don't understand that there are so many subgenre of porn you can't lump things together because they are slightly similar
>>674786168
the popular video leaked on the internet is a recording of the final horse fuck before he died
the last words on the video are "did he cum?"
luv that this is what my city's known for
>>674786589
Kek
>>674786518
"people who dress and grind as furries" so fags then.
>>674786589
I heard he was an engineer for Boeing.
Leaving this website here
En luxuretv com
>>674786518
>it's not in the sense that children aren't being violated for it's production.
That might be actually false. The loli stuff might be produced by the same criminals and same abused children as CP. Posession of such stuff is then as illegal as posession of CP.
I'm pretty sure it's one of those matters which only depends on the will of the judge. And trust me, no judge won't let a "child abuser" free.
>>674786804
kind of weird calling yourself a fag
>>674787006
>might
>maybe
>could
nice argument
>>674786589
No, it is not. It's an urban legend.
>>674783612
It got saged, fagbus
>>674784346
>implying he isn't an older faggot who's gone deeper within the cycle and is trolling you
>implying you aren't even an older massive faggot who crossed the point of no- return